LINKING INNATE and ADAPTIVE IMMUNE RESPONSES By

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

LINKING INNATE and ADAPTIVE IMMUNE RESPONSES By HUMAN β DEFENSIN 3: LINKING INNATE AND ADAPTIVE IMMUNE RESPONSES By: NICHOLAS FUNDERBURG Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Advisors: Michael Lederman, MD. Scott Sieg, PhD. Department of Molecular Biology and Microbiology CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY January 2008 CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF GRADUATE STUDIES We hereby approve the dissertation of ______________Nicholas Funderburg_____________________ candidate for the Ph.D. degree *. (signed)_________David McDonald______________________ (chair of the committee) ______________Michael Lederman__________________ ____ _Scott Sieg________________________ ________Aaron Weinberg___________________ Thomas McCormick___ __________ ________________________________________________ (date) _____7-17-07__________________ *We also certify that written approval has been obtained for any proprietary material contained therein. 2 Table of Contents Table of Contents 3 List of Tables 7 List of Figures 8 Acknowledgements 11 Abstract 12 Chapter 1: Introduction 14 Innate Immunity 17 Antimicrobial Activity of Beta Defensins 19 Human Defensins: Structure and Expression 21 Linking Innate and Adaptive Immune Responses 23 HBDs in HIV Infection 25 Summary of Thesis Work 26 Chapter 2: Human β defensin-3 activates professional antigen-presenting cells via Toll-like Receptors 1 and 2 31 Summary 32 Introduction 33 3 Results 35 HBD-3 induces co-stimulatory molecule expression on APC 35 HBD-3 activation of monocytes occurs through the signaling molecules MyD88 and IRAK-1 36 HBD-3 requires expression of TLR1 and 2 for cellular activation 37 Discussion 40 Materials and Methods 43 Reagents 43 Primary cells and culture conditions 44 HEK293 cell transfectants 44 Flow Cytometry 44 Western Blots 45 TLR Ligand Screening 45 Murine macrophage studies 45 CHO Cell experiments 46 Statistical Methods 46 Acknowledgments 47 Chapter 3: Induction of Surface Molecules and Inflammatory Cytokines by HBD-3 and Pam3CSK4 are regulated differentially by the MAP Kinase Pathways. 57 Summary 58 4 Introduction 59 Results 61 HBD3 induces homing molecule expression on monocytes 61 HBD-3 induces inflammatory cytokine production by monocytes 61 Exposure to different TLR 1/2 ligands generates unique responses from monocytes 62 Differential effects of MAP kinase inhibitors on the induction of CD80 by hBD-3 or Pam3CSK4 63 Discussion 65 Materials and Methods 69 Reagents 69 Cell Preparation and Culture 69 Flow Cyotmetry 70 Quantification of Inflammatory Cytokines 70 Chapter 4: Discussion and Future Directions 86 Discussion 87 Future Directions 90 Hypothesis: HBD-3 will increase the ability of antigen presenting cells to induce T cell responsiveness to antigen. 90 Hypothesis: HBD-3 will enhance the in vivo T cell responsiveness to antigen by activating antigen presenting cells. 92 5 Hypothesis: HBD-3 can interact with TLRs 1 and 2 because it forms dimers and has a high cationic charge. 93 Hypothesis: The Leucine Rich Repeats (LRRS) found in TLR1, but not TLR6, are important for interaction with hBD-3. 95 Hypothesis: Antigen presenting cells from HIV infected patients will have decreased responsiveness to hBD-3 stimulation and lowered levels of hBD-3 production at mucosal sites. 97 Conclusions 100 Appendix: Toll like receptor ligands induce human T cell activation and death, a model for HIV pathogenesis 114 Bibliography 139 6 List of Tables Table 4.1. Summary of HIV+ Donors. 108 7 List of Figures Figure 1.1 Toll-like receptors can signal in MyD88-dependent and independent pathways. 29 Fig. 2.1. Overnight culture with hBD-3 results in increased expression of CD80, CD86, and CD40 on mDCs and monocytes, but not on pDCs. 48 Fig. 2.2. MyD88I inhibits induction of CD80 expression by hBD-3. 50 Fig. 2.3. HBD-3 induces phosphorylation of IRAK-1 in purified monocytes. 51 Fig. 2.4. HBD-3 does not stimulate HEK293 cell lines expressing single Toll-like Receptors. 52 Fig. 2.5. HBD-3 activates cells via TLR1 and TLR2. 53 Fig. 2.6. Human β defensin-3 does not activate mouse Bone Marrow-derived Macrophages. 55 Fig. 2.7. Disruption of the structure of shBD-3 results in loss of activity. 56 Figure 3.1. HBD-2 does not induce Inflammatory Cytokine Expression from Human Peripheral Blood Mononuclear cells. 72 8 Figure 3.2. Overnight exposure to hBD-3 results in increased surface expression of CCR7, CD62L and HLA-DR on monocytes. 73 Figure 3.3. Inflammatory cytokine production is increased from purified monocytes exposed to hBD-3. 75 Figure 3.4. IL-10 production and CD86 expression are differentially affected by exposure to the TLR 1/ 2 ligands hBD-3 and Pam3CSK4 78 Figure 3.5. Inhibition of p38, JNK, and ERK, prevents induction of CD80 by hBD-3 but enhances Pam3CSK4 induced expression of this molecule. 80 Figure 3.6. Inhibition of p38, JNK, and ERK signaling decreases inflammatory cytokine production from monocytes stimulated with hBD-3. 83 Figure 4.1. Human β Defesnsin-3 links the innate and adaptive immune responses at mucosal sites. 102 Figure 4.2. Activation of moncytes by hBD-3 results in increased T cell proliferation during allogeneic challenge. 103 Figure 4.3. Rhesus Macaque monocytes respond to hBD-3 stimulation by increasing 9 surface co-stimulatory molecules and producing inflammatory cytokines. 104 Figure 4.4. Linearization of the hBD-3 peptide results in decreased ability of this molecule to induce CD80 and CD86 expression on monocytes. 106 Figure 4.5. Comparisons of the amino acid sequences and structures of hBD-2 and hBD-3. 107 Figure 4.6. Monocytes and Dendritic Cells from HIV+ donors may have lower levels of TLR1 expression than cells from HIV- donors. 109 Figure 4.7. Induction of CD80 following hBD-3 exposure appears to be diminished on monocytes from HIV+ monocytes. 111 Figure 4.8. Induction of CD80 by LPS and Pam3CSK4 correlates directly with Viral Load. 113 10 Acknowledgements I would first like to thank Michael Lederman and Scott Sieg, for their support and guidance. Their advice and keen mentorship has been invaluable over the past few years. I’d also like to thank everyone in the Lederman/Sieg lab, especially Kathy Medvik, Doug Bazdar, Janelle Salkowitz-Bokal, and Jiang Wei for helping to train me when I first joined the lab. Angel Luciano, thanks for teaming up with me on the T cell project. I would also like to thank Mary Robertson, Jeanine Agler, and Teresa Szary, for being swell dames and always making sure I arrived where I was supposed to, on time, and with the proper account numbers; ‘ppreciate-ya. I would like to thank my Thesis Committee, Dave McDonald, Tom McCormick, and Aaron Weinberg for their advice and direction. I would also like to thank Zhimin Feng for reagents, Cliff Harding, Don Anthony, and everyone else who attended lab meetings for offering constructive criticism and advice. I would also like to thank everyone in the Department of Molecular and Microbiology for all of the questions, guidance, and support over the course of my training. Thanks to the Cell and Molecular Biology Training Grant and Jo Ann Wise for financial support. A hearty thank you to all the blood donors; without you my research wouldn’t have been possible. I’d like to thank Pete Lalli and Julie Jadlowsky, you’ve both been with me from the start; thanks for everything. Thank you to all of the friends I’ve made here at Case and in Cleveland. John McDowell, for giving me my first real lab experience and helping me realize I wanted to go to PhD school instead of Med school, thank you. And thanks for the continued friendship and counsel. Thanks to my family. 11 Human β Defensin 3: Linking Innate and Adaptive Immune Responses Abstract by NICHOLAS T. FUNDERBURG Human β defensins (hBDs) are cationic antimicrobial peptides that can be produced in response to microbial challenge at mucosal sites. Acting as effector molecules of the innate immune system, hBDs can bind to and lyse microorganisms. Defensins have also been shown to bridge the innate and adaptive immune systems through the chemoattraction of immune cells. Here, we provide evidence that hBD-3 also activates antigen presenting cells. Following overnight exposure, hBD-3 can induce expression of the co-stimulatory molecules CD80, CD86, and CD40 on monocytes and myeloid dendritic cells. Activation of monocytes by hBD-3 is mediated by interaction with TLRs 1 and 2, resulting in signaling that requires MyD88 and results in IRAK-1 phosphorylation. Cell lines (HEK and CHO) that have been engineered to express Toll- like Receptors (TLRs) 1 and 2 could be activated by hBD-3, but cells that express other individual TLRs, or TLRs 1 and 6, could not. Antibodies to TLR 1 and TLR 2 were also able to inhibit the hBD-3 mediated induction of CD80 on monocytes. HBD-3 can also induce expression of inflammatory cytokines (IL-8, IL-6, and IL-1β) from purified monocytes. Exposure to hBD-3 induces the expression of the homing receptors CCR7, CD62L, and a key antigen-presenting molecule - HLA-DR on the 12 surfaces of monocytes. Comparisons of the TLR1, 2 binding elements hBD-3 and Pam3CSK4, demonstrate that cell stimulation by these molecules results in differential outcomes. Exposure to Pam3CSK4 results in heightened production of IL-10 and decreased surface expression of CD86. HBD-3 does not stimulate IL-10 production and induces heightened levels of CD86 on monocytes. Also, induction of co-stimulatory molecule expression (CD80) on monocytes by hBD-3 and Pam3CSK4 is regulated differentially by the MAP kinase pathways. This work demonstrates for the first time, that a human antimicrobial peptide has the potential to stimulate cells in a TLR dependent manner; and that stimulation of TLRs 1 and 2 by unique ligands results in qualitative differences in protein expression. By activating antigen presenting cells through TLRs 1 and 2, HBD-3 may be playing a key role in bridging the innate and adaptive immune systems at mucosal sites.
Recommended publications
  • Bacterial Interactions with Cells of the Intestinal Mucosa: Toll- 1182 Like Receptors and Nod2
    Recent advances in basic science BACTERIAL INTERACTIONS WITH CELLS OF THE INTESTINAL MUCOSA: TOLL- 1182 LIKE RECEPTORS AND NOD2 ECario Gut: first published as on 11 July 2005. Downloaded from Gut 2005;54:1182–1193. doi: 10.1136/gut.2004.062794 SUMMARY Toll-like receptors (TLR) and NOD2 are emerging as key mediators of innate host defence in the intestinal mucosa, crucially involved in maintaining mucosal as well as commensal homeostasis. Recent observations suggest new (patho-) physiological mechanisms of how functional versus dysfunctional TLRx/NOD2 pathways may oppose or favour inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). In Published online first 19 April 2005 health, TLRx signalling protects the intestinal epithelial barrier and confers commensal tolerance whereas NOD2 signalling exerts antimicrobial activity and prevents pathogenic invasion. In disease, aberrant TLRx and/or NOD2 signalling may stimulate diverse inflammatory responses leading to acute and chronic intestinal inflammation with many different clinical phenotypes. c INTRODUCTION The intestinal mucosa must rapidly recognise detrimental pathogenic threats to the lumen to initiate controlled immune responses but maintain hyporesponsiveness to omnipresent harmless commensals. Charles Janeway Jr first suggested that so-called pattern recognition receptors (PRRs) may play an essential role in allowing innate immune cells to discriminate between ‘‘self’’ http://gut.bmj.com/ and microbial ‘‘non-self’’ based on the recognition of broadly conserved molecular patterns.1 Toll- like receptors (TLRs) which comprise a class of transmembrane PRRs play a key role in microbial recognition, induction of antimicrobial genes, and the control of adaptive immune responses. NODs (NOD1 and NOD2) are a structurally distinct family of intracellular PRRs which presumably in the context of microbial invasion subserve similar functions (fig 1).
    [Show full text]
  • Endogenous Production of Antimicrobial Peptides in Innate Immunity and Human Disease Richard L
    Endogenous Production of Antimicrobial Peptides in Innate Immunity and Human Disease Richard L. Gallo, MD, PhD, and Victor Nizet, MD Address The definition of an AMP has been loosely applied to Departments of Medicine and Pediatrics, Division of Dermatology, Uni- any peptide with the capacity to inhibit the growth of versity of California San Diego, and VA San Diego Healthcare System, microbes. AMPs might exhibit potent killing or inhibi- San Diego, CA, USA. E-mail: [email protected] tion of a broad range of microorganisms, including gram- positive and -negative bacteria as well as fungi and certain Current Allergy and Asthma Reports 2003, 3:402–409 Current Science Inc. ISSN 1529-7322 viruses. More than 800 such AMPs have been described, Copyright © 2003 by Current Science Inc. and an updated list can be found at the website: http:// www.bbcm.units.it/~tossi/pag1.htm. Some of these AMPs Antimicrobial peptides are diverse and evolutionarily ancient have now been demonstrated to protect diverse organ- molecules produced by all living organisms. Peptides belong- isms, including plants, insects, and mammals, against ing to the cathelicidin and defensin gene families exhibit an infection. AMP sequence analysis has shown that the pep- immune strategy as they defend against infection by inhibiting tide immune system is evolutionarily ancient, and the microbial survival, and modify hosts through triggering tis- conservation of AMP gene families throughout the ani- sue-specific defense and repair events. A variety of processes mal kingdom further supports their biologic significance. have evolved in microbes to evade the action of antimicrobial Antimicrobial peptides function within the conceptual peptides, including the ability to degrade or inactivate antimi- framework of the innate immune system.
    [Show full text]
  • Immuno-Stimulatory Peptides As a Potential Adjunct Therapy Against Intra-Macrophagic Pathogens
    molecules Review Immuno-Stimulatory Peptides as a Potential Adjunct Therapy against Intra-Macrophagic Pathogens Tânia Silva 1,2 and Maria Salomé Gomes 1,2,3,* ID 1 i3S—Instituto de Investigação e Inovação em Saúde, Universidade do Porto, Porto 4200-135, Portugal; [email protected] 2 IBMC—Instituto de Biologia Molecular e Celular, Universidade do Porto, Porto 4200-135, Portugal 3 ICBAS—Instituto de Ciências Biomédicas Abel Salazar, Universidade do Porto, Porto 4050-313, Portugal * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +35-122-607-4950 Received: 14 July 2017; Accepted: 3 August 2017; Published: 4 August 2017 Abstract: The treatment of infectious diseases is increasingly prone to failure due to the rapid spread of antibiotic-resistant pathogens. Antimicrobial peptides (AMPs) are natural components of the innate immune system of most living organisms. Their capacity to kill microbes through multiple mechanisms makes the development of bacterial resistance less likely. Additionally, AMPs have important immunomodulatory effects, which critically contribute to their role in host defense. In this paper, we review the most recent evidence for the importance of AMPs in host defense against intracellular pathogens, particularly intra-macrophagic pathogens, such as mycobacteria. Cathelicidins and defensins are reviewed in more detail, due to the abundance of studies on these molecules. The cell-intrinsic as well as the systemic immune-related effects of the different AMPs are discussed. In the face of the strong potential emerging from the reviewed studies, the prospects for future use of AMPs as part of the therapeutic armamentarium against infectious diseases are presented. Keywords: antimicrobial peptide; host-defense peptide; infection; Mycobacterium; defensin; cathelicidin; macrophage 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Structure, Function, and Evolution of Gga-Avbd11, the Archetype of the Structural Avian-Double- Β-Defensin Family
    Structure, function, and evolution of Gga-AvBD11, the archetype of the structural avian-double- β-defensin family Nicolas Guyota, Hervé Meudalb, Sascha Trappc, Sophie Iochmannd, Anne Silvestrec, Guillaume Joussetb, Valérie Labase,f, Pascale Reverdiaud, Karine Lothb,g, Virginie Hervéd, Vincent Aucagneb, Agnès F. Delmasb, Sophie Rehault-Godberta,1, and Céline Landonb,1 aBiologie des Oiseaux et Aviculture, Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique, Université de Tours, 37380 Nouzilly, France; bCentre de Biophysique Moléculaire, CNRS, 45071 Orléans, France; cInfectiologie et Santé Publique, Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique, Université de Tours, 37380 Nouzilly, France; dCentre d’Etude des Pathologies Respiratoires, INSERM, Université de Tours, 37032 Tours, France; ePhysiologie de la Reproduction et des Comportements, Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique, CNRS, Institut Français du Cheval et de l’Equitation, Université de Tours 37380 Nouzilly, France; fPôle d’Analyse et d’Imagerie des Biomolécules, Chirurgie et Imagerie pour la Recherche et l’Enseignement, Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique, Centre Hospitalier Régional Universitaire, Université de Tours, 37380 Nouzilly, France; and gUnité de Formation et de Recherche Sciences et Techniques, Université d’Orléans, 45100 Orléans, France Edited by Akiko Iwasaki, Yale University, New Haven, CT, and approved November 26, 2019 (received for review July 26, 2019) Outofthe14avianβ-defensins identified in the Gallus gallus genome, The sequence of Gga-AvBD11 contains 2 predicted β-defensin only 3 are present in the chicken egg, including the egg-specific avian motifs (Fig. 1) (7) and represents the sole double-sized defensin β-defensin 11 (Gga-AvBD11). Given its specific localization and its (9.3 kDa) among all 14 AvBDs reported in the chicken species.
    [Show full text]
  • Antimicrobial Human Β-Defensins in the Colon and Their Role in Infectious and Non-Infectious Diseases
    Pathogens 2013, 2, 177-192; doi:10.3390/pathogens2010177 OPEN ACCESS pathogens ISSN 2076-0817 www.mdpi.com/journal/pathogens Review Antimicrobial Human β-Defensins in the Colon and Their Role in Infectious and Non-Infectious Diseases Eduardo R. Cobo and Kris Chadee * Department of Microbiology, Immunology and Infectious Diseases, Gastrointestinal Research Group, Snyder Institute for Chronic Diseases, Faculty of Medicine, University of Calgary, 3330 Hospital Drive NW, Calgary, Alberta T2N 4N1, Canada; E-Mail: [email protected] * Author to who correspondence should be addressed; E-Mail: [email protected]; Tel: +1-403-210-3975; Fax: +1-403-270-2772. Received: 11 January 2013; in revised form: 1 March 2013 / Accepted: 10 March 2013 / Published: 19 March 2013 Abstract: β-defensins are small cationic antimicrobial peptides secreted by diverse cell types including colonic epithelial cells. Human β-defensins form an essential component of the intestinal lumen in innate immunity. The defensive mechanisms of β-defensins include binding to negatively charged microbial membranes that cause cell death and chemoattraction of immune cells. The antimicrobial activity of β-defensin is well reported in vitro against several enteric pathogens and in non-infectious processes such as inflammatory bowel diseases, which alters β-defensin production. However, the role of β-defensin in vivo in its interaction with other immune components in host defense against bacteria, viruses and parasites with more complex membranes is still not well known. This review focuses on the latest findings regarding the role of β-defensin in relevant human infectious and non-infectious diseases of the colonic mucosa.
    [Show full text]
  • Expression and Function of Host Defense Peptides at Inflammation
    International Journal of Molecular Sciences Review Expression and Function of Host Defense Peptides at Inflammation Sites Suhanya V. Prasad, Krzysztof Fiedoruk , Tamara Daniluk, Ewelina Piktel and Robert Bucki * Department of Medical Microbiology and Nanobiomedical Engineering, Medical University of Bialystok, Mickiewicza 2c, Bialystok 15-222, Poland; [email protected] (S.V.P.); krzysztof.fi[email protected] (K.F.); [email protected] (T.D.); [email protected] (E.P.) * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +48-85-7485483 Received: 12 November 2019; Accepted: 19 December 2019; Published: 22 December 2019 Abstract: There is a growing interest in the complex role of host defense peptides (HDPs) in the pathophysiology of several immune-mediated inflammatory diseases. The physicochemical properties and selective interaction of HDPs with various receptors define their immunomodulatory effects. However, it is quite challenging to understand their function because some HDPs play opposing pro-inflammatory and anti-inflammatory roles, depending on their expression level within the site of inflammation. While it is known that HDPs maintain constitutive host protection against invading microorganisms, the inducible nature of HDPs in various cells and tissues is an important aspect of the molecular events of inflammation. This review outlines the biological functions and emerging roles of HDPs in different inflammatory conditions. We further discuss the current data on the clinical relevance of impaired HDPs expression in inflammation and selected diseases. Keywords: host defense peptides; human antimicrobial peptides; defensins; cathelicidins; inflammation; anti-inflammatory; pro-inflammatory 1. Introduction The human body is in a constant state of conflict with the unseen microbial world that threatens to disrupt the host cell function and colonize the body surfaces.
    [Show full text]
  • Human B-Defensin 3 Has Immunosuppressive Activity in Vitro and in Vivo
    Eur. J. Immunol. 2010. 40: 1073–1078 DOI 10.1002/eji.200940041 Immunomodulation 1073 SHORT COMMUNICATION Human b-defensin 3 has immunosuppressive activity in vitro and in vivo Fiona Semple1, Sheila Webb1, Hsin-Ni Li2, Hetal B. Patel3, Mauro Perretti3, Ian J. Jackson1, Mohini Gray2, Donald J. Davidson2 and Julia R. Dorin1 1 MRC Human Genetics Unit, Institute of Genetics and Molecular Medicine, Edinburgh EH4 2XU, Scotland, UK 2 Centre for Inflammation Research, QMRI University of Edinburgh UK 3 William Harvey Research Institute, Barts and The London School of Medicine, Queen Mary University of London UK b-defensins are antimicrobial peptides with an essential role in the innate immune response. In addition b-defensins can also chemoattract cells involved in adaptive immunity. Until now, based on evidence from dendritic cell stimulation, human b defen- sin-3 (hBD3) was considered pro-inflammatory. We present evidence here that hBD3 lacks pro-inflammatory activity in human and mouse primary M/. In addition, in the presence of LPS, hBD3 and the murine orthologue Defb14 (but not hBD2), effectively inhibit TNF-a and IL-6 accumulation implying an anti-inflammatory function. hBD3 also inhibits CD40/ IFN-c stimulation of M/ and in vivo, hBD3 significantly reduces the LPS-induced TNF-a level in serum. Recent work has revealed that hBD3 binds melanocortin receptors but we provide evidence that these are not involved in hBD3 immunomodulatory activity. This implies a dual role for hBD3 in antimicrobial activity and resolution of inflammation. Key words: Anti-inflammatory . cAMP . Defensin . TNF-a Supporting Information available online Introduction insensitive, antimicrobial activity [5].
    [Show full text]
  • Downregulation of Defensin Genes in SARS-Cov-2 Infection
    medRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.09.21.20195537; this version posted September 23, 2020. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission. Downregulation of Defensin genes in SARS-CoV-2 infection Mohammed M Idris*, Sarena Banu, Archana B Siva, Ramakrishnan Nagaraj* CSIR-Centre for Cellular and Molecular Biology, Hyderabad 500007, India *Corresponding Authors: Mohammed M Idris Email: [email protected] Ramakrishnan Nagaraj Email: [email protected] NOTE: This preprint reports new research that has not been certified by peer review and should not be used to guide clinical practice. medRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.09.21.20195537; this version posted September 23, 2020. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission. Abstract: Defensins, crucial components of the innate immune system, play a vital role against infection as part of frontline immunity. Association of SARS-CoV-2 infection with defensins has not been investigated till date. In this study, we have investigated the expression of defensin genes in the buccal cavity during COVID-19 infection. Nasopharyngeal/Oropharyngeal swab samples collected for screening SARS-CoV-2 infection were analyzed for the expression of major defensin genes by the quantitative real-time reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction, qRT-PCR.
    [Show full text]
  • Β-Defensin Expression in the Canine Nasal Cavity by Michelle Satomi
    β-defensin expression in the canine nasal cavity by Michelle Satomi Aono A thesis submitted to the Graduate Faculty of Auburn University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of Masters of Science Auburn, Alabama May 6th, 2013 Keywords: defensin, innate immunity, canine nasal cavity Copyright 2013 by Michelle S. Aono Approved by Edward E. Morrison, Professor and Head of Anatomy, Physiology and Pharmacology Robert Kemppainen, Associate Professor of Anatomy, Physiology and Pharmacology John C. Dennis, Research Fellow IV of Anatomy, Physiology and Pharmacology Abstract Defensins are a family of endogenous antibiotics that are important in mucosal innate immunity, but little is currently known about defensin expression in the nasal cavity. Herein expression of canine β-defensin (cBD)1, cBD103, cBD108 and cBD123 RNA in the respiratory epithelium (RE), cBD1 and 108 RNA in the olfactory epithelium (OE), and cBD1, cBD108, cBD119 and cBD123 RNA in the olfactory bulb (OB) is reported. cBD1 and 103 were also expressed in the canine nares and tongue. cBD102, cBD120, and cBD122 RNA expression was undetectable in the tissues examined. cBD103 transcript abundance in canine nares showed a 90 fold range of inter-individual variation. Murine β-defensin 14 expression mirrors that of cBD103 in the dog, with high expression in the nares and tongue, but has little to no expression in the RE, OE or OB. High expression of cBD103 in the nares may provide indirect protection to the OE by eliminating pathogens in the rostral portion of the nasal cavity, whereas cBD1 and 108 may provide direct protection to the RE and OE.
    [Show full text]
  • Aggressive Mature Natural Killer Cell Neoplasms
    isord D ers od & lo T r B f a n o s l f a u n s r Journal of i o u n o Lima, J Blood Disorders Transf 2013, 5:1 J ISSN: 2155-9864 Blood Disorders & Transfusion DOI: 10.4172/2155-9864.1000182 Review Article OpenOpen Access Access Aggressive Mature Natural Killer Cell Neoplasms: from Disease Biology to Disease Manifestations Margarida Lima* Department of Hematology, Laboratory of Cytometry, Hospital de Santo António, Centro Hospitalar do Porto, Multidisciplinary Unit for Biomedical Investigation, Portugal Abstract Nature killer (NK)/T cell lymphoma, nasal type, and aggressive NK-cell leukemia are rare tumors with higher prevalence in Asia, Central and South America, which are etiologically related to the Epstein Barr virus (EBV). Proteins encoded by EBV genes and non-coding viral RNAs expressed on the infected cells are involved in immune deregulation and cell transformation and lymphomagenesis occur as a consequence of multiple oncogenic events. Complex chromosomal abnormalities are frequent and loss of chromosomes 6q, 11q, 13q, and 17p are recurrent aberrations. In accordance, many genes are differentially expressed, often due to gene deletion, mutation or methylation. These include, among others, tumor suppressor genes and oncogenes, as wells as genes involved in cell signal transducer pathways, cell survival and apoptosis, cell cycle, cell motility and cell adhesion, as well as in cell communication through cytokine networks. Consequently many biochemical pathways are affected in NK-cell neoplasms, which could contribute to cancer development and progression, as well as to disease manifestations. This review focuses on the molecular and biochemical mechanisms by which EBV induces NK-cell lymphomagenesis, disrupting genes and molecules involved in crucial biological processes.
    [Show full text]
  • Department of Physics, Chemistry and Biology Bachelor Thesis, 16 Hp | Biology Programme: Physics, Chemistry and Biology Spring Term 2019 | LITH-IFM-X-EX--19/3696--SE
    Linköping University | Department of Physics, Chemistry and Biology Bachelor thesis, 16 hp | Biology programme: Physics, Chemistry and Biology Spring term 2019 | LITH-IFM-x-EX--19/3696--SE A Versatile Group of Molecules, Can Defensins Make an Impact in Medicine? Filip Fors Examinator, Matthias Laska, IFM Biologi, Linköpings universitet Tutor, Jordi Altimiras, IFM Biologi, Linköpings universitet Avdelning, institution Datum Division, Department Date 6/6-19 Department of Physics, Chemistry and Biology Linköping University Språk Rapporttypi ISBN Language Report category Svenska/Swedish Licentiatavhandling ISRN: LITH-IFM-x-EX--19/3696--SE Engelska/English Examensarbete _________________________________________________________________ C-uppsats D-uppsats Serietitel och serienummer ISSN ________________ Övrig rapport Title of series, numbering ______________________________ _____________ URL för elektronisk version Titel Title A Versatile Group of Molecules, Can Defensins Make an Impact in Medicine? Författare Author Filip Fors Sammanfattning Abstract Antimicrobial peptides are an ancient form of innate defense and is present in all ways of life. In humans they are present as cathelicidins and defensins. Both are important for the immune system and they exhibit activity against viruses, bacteria and fungi. Defensins exhibit less cytotoxicity and are better characterized and are thus more easily developed as therapeutic tools. Defensins are apt at doing a multitude of things, from inhibiting Herpes simplex virus replication and preventing anthrax’ lethality to helping with wound closure and acting as biomarkers for a variety of ailments. Defensins have consistently shown good results in a laboratory setting but have less than exemplary in vivo results. Defensins’ multifunctionality as well as the complex environment in living organisms makes characterizing why defensins are not performing as well in vivo difficult.
    [Show full text]
  • Monocyte Activation and Membrane Disruption Mediated By
    MONOCYTE ACTIVATION AND MEMBRANE DISRUPTION MEDIATED BY HUMAN β-DEFENSIN-3 by ANTHONY BRUNO LIOI Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements For the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Dissertation Adviser: Dr. Scott Sieg Department of Molecular Biology and Microbiology Molecular Virology Program CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY January, 2014 CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF GRADUATE STUDIES We hereby approve the dissertation of _______________________Anthony Bruno Lioi___________________________ candidate for the ______________Doctor of Philosophy_____________ degree *. (signed) ____________________David McDonald_________________________ (chair of the committee) _______________________Scott Sieg_____________________________ _______________________Michael Lederman______________________ _______________________George Dubyak_________________________ _______________________Aaron Weinberg________________________ _______________________Alan Levine___________________________ (date) _____11/20/2013_________ *We also certify that written approval has been obtained for any proprietary material contained therein. TABLE OF CONTENTS Table of Contents ................................................................................................................ i List of Tables ..................................................................................................................... v List of Figures ................................................................................................................... vi List of
    [Show full text]