Tourism Competitiveness and Sustainability Indicators in the Context of Surf Tourism: the Case of Cape Town
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
sustainability Article Tourism Competitiveness and Sustainability Indicators in the Context of Surf Tourism: The Case of Cape Town Roberto Martín-González 1 , Kamilla Swart 2,3,* and Ana-María Luque-Gil 1 1 Faculty of Tourism, University of Málaga, Campus de Teatinos s/n, 29071 Málaga, Spain; [email protected] (R.M.-G.); [email protected] (A.-M.L.-G.) 2 Division of Engineering Management and Decision Sciences, College of Science and Engineering, Hamad Bin Khalifa University, Education City, Qatar Foundation, Doha 24404, Qatar 3 School of Tourism and Hospitality, University of Johannesburg, Johannesburg 2092, South Africa * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +974-4454-0942 Abstract: Sport tourism has experienced considerable growth in the last decades, either from the sport events perspective or considering an active sport tourism approach. Therefore, some emergent market niches like surf tourism have been developed in numerous coastal destinations to attract sustainability-sensitive tourists due to the ongoing environmental challenges and the socio-economic crisis. Cape Town is positioned in a prominent place in terms of competitiveness, with a considerable variety of beaches and surf spots facing multiple issues. The aim of this study is to try to identify the most competitive beaches and subdistricts in terms of sustainability and to suggest criteria for surf-tourism-related indicators to obtain an overview about this space, using weighting indicators, and applying geography and political economy lenses. The results reveal that Strand, Table View, and Surfers’ Corner are the most competitive beaches. Additionally, beaches located in some Citation: Martín-González, R.; Swart, underprivileged areas such as Mitchells Plain and Khayelitsha are potentially interesting from a socio- K.; Luque-Gil, A.-M. Tourism economic development point of view, although they show a lack of accommodation infrastructures. Competitiveness and Sustainability These results seem to indicate that those areas should be closely monitored, and destination managers Indicators in the Context of Surf should focus their attention and finance there to obtain a more sustainable surf tourism development. Tourism: The Case of Cape Town. Sustainability 2021, 13, 7238. Keywords: sport tourism; surf tourism; tourism competitiveness indicators; sustainable tourism https://doi.org/10.3390/su13137238 Academic Editors: Patrick Bouchet and Claude Sobry 1. Introduction The growth of sport tourism from the end of the last millennium is well known [1,2] Received: 18 May 2021 although its sustainability has also been put into question for this reason [3]. The re- Accepted: 23 June 2021 Published: 28 June 2021 cent COVID-19 crisis has exacerbated the issues related to tourism activities worldwide, highlighting the weaknesses of tourism markets such as sport event tourism [4] or the Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral meetings, incentives, conventions, and exhibitions sector [5]. At the same time, it has with regard to jurisdictional claims in enhanced the importance of sports and outdoor activities for maintaining physical and published maps and institutional affil- mental health [6,7], and a desire for increasing participation in such activities when the iations. pandemic is announced as concluded has been reported [8]. Amongst those outdoor activities, surfing [9] and surf tourism have experienced a continuous growth [10], with countries historically reluctant to its practice, such as China, getting involved in it [11]. In this context, many coastal destinations have developed surf tourism as a way to develop their socio-economic potential [12–14], with others being interested by the possibility of Copyright: © 2021 by the authors. attracting sustainability-sensitive tourists, as surfers seem to develop pro-environmental Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article behaviors [15,16]. This is the case of Cape Town in South Africa [17,18]. Nevertheless, the distributed under the terms and sustainability of surf tourism is controversial [19,20]. Consequently, some tools have been conditions of the Creative Commons proposed from the academy [21–23], although they have only been applied in Thailand Attribution (CC BY) license (https:// and focus on sustainable planning [24], while in Cape Town, socio-economic indicators creativecommons.org/licenses/by/ were implemented in the context of the health crisis created by the spread of COVID-19, 4.0/). but with a lack of environmental indicators [25]. Sustainability 2021, 13, 7238. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13137238 https://www.mdpi.com/journal/sustainability Sustainability 2021, 13, 7238 2 of 22 Sustainability 2021, 13, x FOR PEER REVIEW 2 of 23 The main objective of this article is to try to identify the most competitive beaches implemented in the context of the health crisis created by the spread of COVID-19, but andwith subdistricts a lack of environmental in terms of indicators sustainability, [25]. as well as to suggest criteria for surf-tourism- relatedThe indicators main objective to assess of this tourism article is potential, to try to identify based onthe sustainablemost competitive tourism beaches destination competitiveness,and subdistricts in usingterms weightingof sustainability, indicators as well and as to applying suggest criteria geography for surf-tourism- and political econ- omyrelated to Capeindicators Town to beaches.assess tourism It also potentia seeksl, to based extend on thesustainable limited socio-economictourism destination indicators implementedcompetitiveness, in using the previousweighting study,indicators adding and applying environmental geography indicators and political and econ- readjusting theomy weights. to Cape Town beaches. It also seeks to extend the limited socio-economic indicators implementedThe obtained in the previous results seem study, to adding indicate environmental that there areindicators three mainand readjusting areas with the three dif- ferentweights. characteristics in terms of sustainability. First, the Western area seems to have an economicThe obtained competitive results advantage, seem to indicate since that most there of theare surfthree companiesmain areas with and three accommodation dif- unitsferent are characteristics concentrated in terms in that ofpart sustainability. of Cape Town. First, the Second, Western the area Southern seems to coast have has an reached economic competitive advantage, since most of the surf companies and accommodation the highest score in terms of environmental sustainability. This area houses a variety of units are concentrated in that part of Cape Town. Second, the Southern coast has reached surfing spots and includes Seal Island and most Shark Spotters posts, which indicates that the highest score in terms of environmental sustainability. This area houses a variety of theresurfing is spots a wide and range includes of wildlife. Seal Island Third, and most the area Shark that Spotters includes posts, Mitchells which indicates Plain and that Khayelit- shathere obtained is a wide the range greatest of wildlife. score Third, for the the social area indicator,that includes as Mitchells they experienced Plain and aKhaye- lower impact oflitsha the obtained COVID-19 thefirst greatest wave. score Additionally, for the social the indicator, high number as they experienced of social infrastructures a lower im- seems topact have of the importance COVID-19 in first that wave result. Additionally, as well. On the the high other number hand, of it social has also infrastructures revealed the weak- nessesseems to of have each importance area, showing in that that result unprivileged as well. On the areas other need hand, more it has tourismalso revealed infrastructures the (e.g.,weaknesses accommodation of each area, units) showingto gain that anunprivileged advantage areas in surf need tourism more tourism development. infrastruc- The study startstures (e.g., with accommodation the theoretical units) framework to gain adoptedan advantage (political in surf economy, tourism development. tourism system The theory, andstudy tourism starts with competitiveness), the theoretical framework and then continues adopted (political with a literature economy, review tourism of system sport tourism andtheory, surf and tourism. tourism Section competitiven2 concludesess), and with then acontinues review aboutwith a literature the linkages review between of sport tourism tourism and surf tourism. Section 2 concludes with a review about the linkages between potential, competitiveness, and sustainability indicators. Then, the material and methods tourism potential, competitiveness, and sustainability indicators. Then, the material and are outlined in Section3, starting with the study area. It continues with the methodology methods are outlined in Section 3, starting with the study area. It continues with the meth- andodology sources, and sources, and concludes and concludes with thewith surf the tourismsurf tourism sustainable sustainable indicators. indicators.Thereafter, There- the resultsafter, the are results presented are presented in Section in4 Section, differentiating 4, differentiating between between beaches beaches and subdistricts. and subdis- Finally, thetricts. article Finally, ends the with article a shortends with discussion a short discussion and conclusion and conclusion of the results. of the results. 2.2. TheoreticalTheoretical Framework Framework and and Literature Literature Review Review Broadly,