SWP Comments 2008/C 17, July 2008, 5 Pages

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

SWP Comments 2008/C 17, July 2008, 5 Pages Introduction Stiftung Wissenschaft und Politik German Institute for International and Security Affairs The Race to the White House 2008: Historic in Many Ways SWP Comments Andrew Cohen The first of the three acts of this long, feverish and historic presidential campaign of 2008 is over. The primary season, which stretched from the dead of winter to the end of spring, has finally produced nominees for the two major parties. Now, in the second act, the Republicans and the Democrats are mapping strategy, testing ideas and prepar- ing to gather at their national conventions in late summer. In the third act, they will face each other in the general election this autumn. If the primaries were prologue, it will be an extraordinary contest between two unorthodox candidates unlike any before. They will spend a record amount of money, recruit new voters, and, prospectively, redraw the electoral map of the United States. Few presidential elections have changed as dacy; surely he could not unseat Clinton, quickly and decisively as this one. Nothing the party’s star. is as it first appeared to be, which is why it If you had said that Mike Huckabee, a would be foolish to predict the campaign’s little-known, long-serving governor of denouement on November 4. Conventional Arkansas, would emerge as the runner-up wisdom has been wrong from the start. It to McCain, or that the seemingly invincible was widely assumed in the summer of 2007, Giuliani would melt before the winter’s for example, that the Democrats would snows, that, too, would have been laughable. choose Senator Hillary Clinton of New York In each case, the improbable happened. and the Republicans would choose Rudolf Then again, this campaign is already the Giuliani, the former mayor of New York longest, most expensive, most competitive City. While both were in the race then, and most democratic in American political neither Senator Barack Obama of Illinois history. It is perfect political storm of super- nor Senator John McCain of Arizona seemed latives to describe the first truly open race a real possibility. McCain had dismissed for the White House—that is, one without most of his staff and was languishing in the a sitting president or vice-president run- polls; surely he was too old (then 71) and ning—since the election of 1952. independent to become his party’s nomi- When it began two years ago, who knew nee. Obama had been in the Senate only that the campaign would produce the two years when he announced his candi- oldest man to be nominated for president Andrew Cohen is professor at the Norman Paterson School of International Affairs at Carleton University in Ottawa. SWP Comments 17 In 2007–2008, he was a Visiting Fellow in the Americas Division of the SWP July 2008 1 by a major party? Or, that it would produce President. Obama disagrees with all of the first black man to be nominated for them. While McCain once opposed the Bush president by a major party, after he narrow- tax cuts ($1.35 trillion in 2001 and $320 ly defeated the most formidable woman billion in 2003), for example, he now wants ever to seek the presidency? In trying to to make them permanent. He has also define what has taken place in the last year proposed four new ones. Obama opposes all or so, let us examine some of the cam- of them, which he says are regressive and paign’s elements: policy, diversity, identity, favour the rich. He also opposed McCain’s electability, history, dynasty, inevitability, healthcare plan, which isn’t as comprehen- money, democracy, and strategy. sive as his. He will attack McCain for revers- ing himself on immigration, the treatment and torture of detainees in Guantanamo Bay Policy and offshore oil drilling. Among the leading Democrats, there were Obama isn’t trumpeting any grand surprisingly few real differences. On im- themes such as Kennedy’s New Frontier or migration, education and health care, Lyndon Johnson’s Great Society. He has Clinton and Obama were alike. The promi- plans and programs, but his appeal is less nence of universal health care, which was policy than personality. However, he will the leading domestic issue early on, sug- offer health care, tax cuts for the middle gests that the United States might be ready class and tax increases for those making to embrace it decades after Europe and more than $250,000 a year. He favours Canada. By the end of the campaign, though, more liberal immigration, controls on the deteriorating economy had displaced greenhouse gases, and has doubts about health care as the top domestic issue. the North American Free Trade Agreement. Clinton proposed rebates to diminish the McCain will attack him for his own in- impact of soaring gasoline prices; Obama consistency, such as reversing his support rejected the idea. On Iraq, Obama argued for campaign public financing. that he had opposed the war that Clinton supported. Among the leading Republicans, there Diversity were more differences, which was unusual No race has had the complexion—and the for a party which likes to choose its nomi- complexity—of this one. This year, for the nee early. In a primary season which Repub- first time, a woman, a black and a Hispanic lican strategist Ralph Reed called “the most American ran for the Democrats, all of unpredictable roller-coaster ride” since the them highly credible. As the field thinned, 1960s, some of the candidates urged a John Edwards was the lone white male in tougher line on immigration as they tried the race. For the Republicans, there was an to appeal to the party’s conservative base. Italian and a Mormon. Like the Democrats, though, the Republi- What does this say? Diversity matters cans thought other criteria (electability, in America. The country is not the mono- character) more important in choosing lith or melting pot; consider the rise of their nominee than policy. Hispanic America (44 million, 15 percent If there were few real differences within of the population) as a political force, par- the parties in the primary season, there ticularly in the Southwest. That the Demo- will be real differences between them in the crats have chosen a black man as their general election. Obama will label a McCain nominee and that Americans may make presidency “the third term of George W. him president shows the country’s capacity Bush,” and on the economy, Iraq and health to reinvent itself. In 2008, ethnic politics care, he can argue that the Senator’s posi- may be decisive. Obama hopes to mobilize tions are indeed close to those of the the highest turnout ever among Black SWP Comments 17 July 2008 2 America (40 million, 13 percent of the organization, not because she is a woman. population). Obama hopes his stand on And was Barack Obama a victim of racism? immigration—allowing illegal immigrants Both remain imponderable. to stay—will also attract support among Hispanic Americans, whom the Republi- cans are courting aggressively in places like Electability Florida. The Democrats are launching In the absence of serious issues among recruitment and registration drives in both Democrats, the ballot question in the communities. The challenge in wooing primaries turned on electability. Who had Hispanic voters, who are concentrated the best chance of winning in the fall? in Arizona, New Mexico, Florida, and Colo- Clinton argued that she had a longer record rado, is that they account for only ten per- of public service, had greater appeal to cent of the nation’s voters. Their commu- middle class whites, and had more experi- nity is disproportionately young and one ence in government. Obama said that he quarter of them cannot vote because they could appeal to independent voters, who are not citizens. Still, McCain and Obama might have voted for the Republicans, as will be vying intensely for them. well as younger voters, who had never voted at all. Beyond electability, the issue of experi- Identity ence defined the first act of the campaign. With diversity has come a return to identity Clinton said her seven years in the Senate politics. Despite the efforts of Clinton and and eight years in the White House as First Obama to broaden their appeal, in the end Lady had taught her how to lead, even if both were relying heavily on their core con- she was never clear about her responsibili- stituencies. Women (as well as older men, ties in the White House. (The one issue she Catholics, less-educated whites and His- called her own—healthcare—was the biggest panics) went for her. Blacks (as well as policy failure of her husband’s two-term young people and more-educated whites) presidency.) She declared Obama’s three went for him. The question is whether years in the Senate (after eight years in those voters who supported Clinton in the state politics in Illinois) inadequate prepa- big industrial states such as Pennsylvania ration for the presidency. Obama argued and Ohio will support Obama or switch to that his background (of mixed race), char- McCain, as some disenchanted supporters acter (cool and conciliatory) and his years threatened after Clinton was defeated. For living abroad were the basis of his appeal. Clinton, establishing an identity apart from Historically speaking, however, neither that of her husband was one of the great Clinton nor Obama had anywhere near challenges of her campaign. When she the experience that John F. Kennedy and asked him to play a major role—which he Richard Nixon had in 1960. did as fervent partisan on her behalf, dimin- ishing his stature as a former president—she made it more difficult for her to escape his Dynasty shadow.
Recommended publications
  • ("DSCC") Files This Complaint Seeking an Immediate Investigation by the 7
    COMPLAINT BEFORE THE FEDERAL ELECTION CBHMISSIOAl INTRODUCTXON - 1 The Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee ("DSCC") 7-_. J _j. c files this complaint seeking an immediate investigation by the 7 c; a > Federal Election Commission into the illegal spending A* practices of the National Republican Senatorial Campaign Committee (WRSCIt). As the public record shows, and an investigation will confirm, the NRSC and a series of ostensibly nonprofit, nonpartisan groups have undertaken a significant and sustained effort to funnel "soft money101 into federal elections in violation of the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971, as amended or "the Act"), 2 U.S.C. 5s 431 et seq., and the Federal Election Commission (peFECt)Regulations, 11 C.F.R. 85 100.1 & sea. 'The term "aoft money" as ueed in this Complaint means funds,that would not be lawful for use in connection with any federal election (e.g., corporate or labor organization treasury funds, contributions in excess of the relevant contribution limit for federal elections). THE FACTS IN TBIS CABE On November 24, 1992, the state of Georgia held a unique runoff election for the office of United States Senator. Georgia law provided for a runoff if no candidate in the regularly scheduled November 3 general election received in excess of 50 percent of the vote. The 1992 runoff in Georg a was a hotly contested race between the Democratic incumbent Wyche Fowler, and his Republican opponent, Paul Coverdell. The Republicans presented this election as a %ust-win81 election. Exhibit 1. The Republicans were so intent on victory that Senator Dole announced he was willing to give up his seat on the Senate Agriculture Committee for Coverdell, if necessary.
    [Show full text]
  • The Christian Coalition in the Life Cycle of the Religious Right
    UNLV Retrospective Theses & Dissertations 1-1-1997 Defying the odds: The Christian Coalition in the life cycle of the Religious Right Kathleen S Espin University of Nevada, Las Vegas Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalscholarship.unlv.edu/rtds Repository Citation Espin, Kathleen S, "Defying the odds: The Christian Coalition in the life cycle of the Religious Right" (1997). UNLV Retrospective Theses & Dissertations. 3321. http://dx.doi.org/10.25669/CQHQ-ABU5 This Thesis is protected by copyright and/or related rights. It has been brought to you by Digital Scholarship@UNLV with permission from the rights-holder(s). You are free to use this Thesis in any way that is permitted by the copyright and related rights legislation that applies to your use. For other uses you need to obtain permission from the rights-holder(s) directly, unless additional rights are indicated by a Creative Commons license in the record and/ or on the work itself. This Thesis has been accepted for inclusion in UNLV Retrospective Theses & Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Digital Scholarship@UNLV. For more information, please contact [email protected]. INFORMATION TO USERS This manuscript has been reproduced from the microfilm master. UMI films the text direct^ from the original or copy submitted. Thus, some thesis and dissertation copies are in typewriter fiic^ udnle others may be fix>m any type o f computer printer. The qnalityr of this reproduction is dependent npon the quality of the copy submitted. Broken or indistinct print, colored or poor quality illustrations and photographs, print bleedthrough, substandard margins, and improper alignment can adversety afikct reproduction.
    [Show full text]
  • Understanding Evangelical Support For, and Opposition to Donald Trump in the 2016 Presidential Election
    Portland State University PDXScholar Dissertations and Theses Dissertations and Theses 9-1-2020 Understanding Evangelical Support for, and Opposition to Donald Trump in the 2016 Presidential Election Joseph Thomas Zichterman Portland State University Follow this and additional works at: https://pdxscholar.library.pdx.edu/open_access_etds Part of the Political Science Commons Let us know how access to this document benefits ou.y Recommended Citation Zichterman, Joseph Thomas, "Understanding Evangelical Support for, and Opposition to Donald Trump in the 2016 Presidential Election" (2020). Dissertations and Theses. Paper 5570. https://doi.org/10.15760/etd.7444 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access. It has been accepted for inclusion in Dissertations and Theses by an authorized administrator of PDXScholar. Please contact us if we can make this document more accessible: [email protected]. Understanding Evangelical Support for, and Opposition to Donald Trump in the 2016 Presidential Election by Joseph Thomas Zichterman A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts in Political Science Thesis Committee: Richard Clucas, Chair Jack Miller Kim Williams Portland State University 2020 Abstract This thesis addressed the conundrum that 81 percent of evangelicals supported Donald Trump in the 2016 presidential election, despite the fact that his character and comportment commonly did not exemplify the values and ideals that they professed. This was particularly perplexing to many outside (and within) evangelical circles, because as leaders of America’s “Moral Majority” for almost four decades, prior to Trump’s campaign, evangelicals had insisted that only candidates who set a high standard for personal integrity and civic decency, were qualified to serve as president.
    [Show full text]
  • ASJ-68-04.Pdf (324.3Kb)
    American Studies Journal 68 S. Baudry, G. Marche, C. Planchou (Eds.) © Universitätsverlag Göttingen 2019 “The Moral Equivalent of Rosa Parks?” The New Christian Right’s Framing Strategy in the Latest Chapter of the Culture Wars Marie Gayte University of Toulon, Toulon, France Abstract In evaluating recent developments in the New Christian Right (NCR), this paper uses the social movement theory approach of framing. Social movement organiza- tions try to gain advantages with authorities and the public by framing their demands in ways intended to persuade people that their cause is valid. The most effective way of doing this is to align their specific issues rhetorically with larger cultural themes and values, which makes the frame accessible to larger audiences. After debating as to whether a conservative religious crusade can be considered a social movement, this paper examines the NCR as a collective movement whose influence on society and capacity to mobilize are heightened by resorting to the ‘discriminated minority’ framing strategy. I argue that viewing the NCR as a social movement allows us to deepen our understanding of both religious conservatism and of the culture wars. Keywords: Conservatism, Framing, LGBT Rights, Moral Majority, New Christian Right, Ralph Reed, Randall Terry, Religious Conservatives 1 When observing from overseas the rhetoric used by religious conservatives in the United States today, one gets the impression that they now constitute a minority group that is being targeted and discriminated against, not unlike African Americans until the 1960s.[1] This alleged persecution, in addition to bringing up echoes of the Civil Rights Movement, also points toward a violation of a right that Americans hold dear and that is enshrined in the First Amendment to the Constitution: the free ex- ercise of religion.
    [Show full text]
  • Target San Diego
    Target San Diego The Right Wing Assault on Urban Democracy and Smart Government Lee Cokorinos Target San Diego The Right Wing Assault on Urban Democracy and Smart Government A Report for the Center on Policy Initiatives Lee Cokorinos November 2005 Table of Contents Acknowledgments . ii Foreword . iii Executive Summary . v Introduction: The National Significance of the Battle for San Diego . 1 1. The National Context: Key Organizations Leading the Right’s Assault on the States and Cities . 5 A. The American Legislative Exchange Council . 7 B. The State Policy Network . 13 C. The Claremont Institute for the Study of Statesmanship and Political Philosophy . 17 D. The Pacific Research Institute . 21 E. Americans for Tax Reform and the Project for California’s Future . 25 F. The Reason Foundation . 33 2. The Performance Institute and the Assault on San Diego . 39 3. The Battle for America’s Cities: A National Engagement . 49 Endnotes . 57 I ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Acknowledgments This report was made possible through the generous support of the New World Foundation. Special thanks go to Colin Greer and Ann Bastian of New World for their leadership in fostering the movement for progressive renewal. Thanks also to Donald Cohen of the Center on Policy Initiatives for contributing keen insights and the benefit of his ground level experience at engaging the right at every step of the research and writing, to Murtaza Baxamusa of CPI for sharing his expertise, and to veteran political researcher Jerry Sloan for his valuable advice. Jerry’s decades of research on the California and the national right have educated a generation of activists.
    [Show full text]
  • Christian Coalition: the Evolving Unity of the Fundamentalist Right
    Journal of Political Science Volume 23 Number 1 Article 6 November 1995 Christian Coalition: The Evolving Unity of the Fundamentalist Right Oran P. Smith Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.coastal.edu/jops Part of the Political Science Commons Recommended Citation Smith, Oran P. (1995) "Christian Coalition: The Evolving Unity of the Fundamentalist Right," Journal of Political Science: Vol. 23 : No. 1 , Article 6. Available at: https://digitalcommons.coastal.edu/jops/vol23/iss1/6 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Politics at CCU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Journal of Political Science by an authorized editor of CCU Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. CHRISTIAN COALITION: THE EVOLVING UNITY OF THE FUNDAMENTALIST RIGHT Oran P. Smith, Universityof South Carolina The earliest studies into the voting behavior of religious people classified religious voters very simply: Protestant, Catholic, Jew. This simplistic understanding has given way in the last 35 years to much more intense scrutiny of the differences within Protestantism, Catholicism, and even Jewry at the ballot box. The most recent analysis has broken down Protestantism further, sifting out the differences between Main Line Protestants, Evangelical Protestants, and Fundamental ists in political behavior. This article will attempt to take this progression in the literature one step further. Instead of subdividing Protestantism into parts and analyzing the distinctions, we will attempt to blend what we have learned from the voting behavior literature with theories of interest groups and social movements to subdivide a part of Protestantism, the Fundamentalis t Right.
    [Show full text]
  • White Evangelicals and the 2016 Presidential Election Margaret
    ABSTRACT The Elephant in the Room: White Evangelicals and the 2016 Presidential Election Margaret Thonnard Director: Elizabeth Corey, PhD In 2016, eighty-one percent of white evangelical voters voted for Donald Trump—the demographics’ highest showing of support for any presidential candidate in over two decades. Using both existing and original research, this thesis attempts to create awareness for the historical context behind white evangelical support for Donald Trump. Topics covered include the relationships between high-profile evangelicals and presidents such as Nixon and Reagan, as well as the role of televangelists in the 2016 election. After considering the development of partisanship within the evangelical community, the thesis concludes by assessing the practical options available to evangelical voters in upcoming elections. APPROVED BY DIRECTOR OF HONORS THESIS: __________________________________ Dr. Elizabeth Corey, Honors Program APPROVED BY THE HONORS PROGRAM: ______________________________________________ Dr. Elizabeth Corey, Director DATE: ________________ The Elephant in the Room: White Evangelicals and the 2016 Presidential Election A Thesis Submitted to the Faculty of Baylor University In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Honors Program By Margaret Thonnard Waco, Texas May 2020 TABLE OF CONTENTS Preface................................................................................................................................ iii Introduction ........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • CHAPTER 16 INTEREST GROUPS Chapter Goals and Learning
    CHAPTER 16 INTEREST GROUPS Chapter Goals and Learning Objectives One of the most influential men in Washington during the late 1990s and through much of the first term of George W. Bush was a Washington, D.C. lobbyist named Jack Abramoff. As a former President of the College National Republican Committee, Abramoff used his long-standing college political alliances to advance his career, eventually joining a prominent law firm’s Washington, D.C. office as a lobbyist after the Republican take over of the U.S. House in the mid-1990s. He developed friendships with such Republican luminaries as Ralph Reed and House Majority Leader Tom DeLay. Abramoff’s influence grew with the Republican controlled Congress and the new administration of President George W. Bush, even serving on the 2001 Bush Administration’s Transition Team. However, in January of 2006, Abramoff pled guilty to several felony criminal counts in a Washington, D.C., federal court on fraud and corruption of public officials charges. In March of 2006, he was sentenced to over five years in prison and ordered to pay restitution of more than $21 million. Abramoff’s case was exceptional. Most lobbyists in Washington go about their business of representing clients in the halls of Congress and before federal agencies without committing fraud or bribery. Yet the Abramoff scandal caused an intense focus on the business of lobbying and the role of special interest groups in American politics and government. Special interest groups spend incredible amounts of money in an attempt to sway the votes of members of Congress and decision-makers in the executive branch.
    [Show full text]
  • Homophobic Preacher, Lou Sheldon, to Speak at Waukesha Rally
    VOLUME SEVEN, NO. 3—February 3, 1994—February 16, 1994—Issue 147 FREE Give the People Light and they will find their own way. The Wisconsin Light February 12 Statewide Network Homophobic Preacher, Lou Sheldon, Meeting Planned At Waukesha Rally By Baldwin To Speak [Madison]- State Representative Tammy Baldwin (D-Madison) is putting out a call to Lesbian, Gay and Bisexual Is Founder and Leader of Traditional Values Coalition organizations and individuals to join forces in a state-wide network. [Milwaukee]- "What the Los Angeles "The objective of the organization is to Times considers 'Gay bashers' and get Lesbians, Gay men and Bisexuals `homophobics' are in actuality concerned from all over Wisconsin in communication individuals who feel that homosexuality is with one another. We must develop a not written or prescribed in the genetic powerful statewide organization that will code..." be prepared to fight the assaults on our "Festivals are just the first step in community and our rights," Baldwin their strategy. The festival was to said. neutralize and defuse people's keenly The network is in the early development held emotional feelings and make stages and has had two organizational homosexuality just another choice; like meetings so far. "At this point, we are choosing chocolate or strawberry ice trying to build a comprehensive list of cream." LesBiGay organizations and resources. "We would have no argument if they We are also brainstorming ideas as to had stayed in the closet." how the network should operate," All of the above are from Lou Sheldon Baldwin noted. being quoted in a report prepared by the The premise of the organization is to National Gay and Lesbian Task Force have a united organization that will: 1) (NGLTF).
    [Show full text]
  • James Mcbride Available Online At
    The GCAS Review Journal Vol. I, Issue 1/2021 © James McBride Available online at https://www.gcasreview.com/publications Authoritarianism and Religion: Trump and White American Evangelicals in Cultural Perspective James McBride New York University [email protected] Abstract: 81% of white American Evangelicals voted for Trump, despite the fact that he embodied moral values they deem repugnant, a twice-divorced, foul-mouthed adulterer, compulsive liar, and unabashed materialist. White Evangelicals offer two reasons for their support: Trump’s alleged conversion to born-again Christianity and status as a “baby Christian”; and his “chosen-ness” as a messianic figure, akin to King David, supposedly anointed by God despite his immoral behavior. Neither of these answers is satisfying. This paper addresses the contradiction between “family values” voters and Trump by drawing on existing literature concerning the relationship of authoritarianism to religion, arguing that white American Evangelicals support Trump because they resonate with his authoritarian values. Over a period of some 70 years since the original publication of Adorno et al.’s The Authoritarian Personality (TAP), social scientific research has identified key characteristics of authoritarianism. TAP was refined in the 1980s-1990s by Robert Altemeyer who developed a survey instrument on Right-Wing Authoritarianism (RWA) based on the key factors of conventionalism, authoritarian aggression, and authoritarian submission. An examination of Trump’s speeches and tweets confirms his use of authoritarian discourse and his endorsement of authoritarian values, most specifically his narcissistic performance as an alleged “strongman” who “alone” can fix democracy. Although there is no inherent relationship between authoritarianism and religion, researchers have identified links between authoritarian values and the practice of “conventional, unquestioned and unreflected religion” commonly found among Evangelicals.
    [Show full text]
  • 'To Quarterback Behind the Scenes, Third-Party Efforts': the Tobacco Industry and the Tea Party
    Research paper Tob Control: first published as 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2012-050815 on 8 February 2013. Downloaded from ‘To quarterback behind the scenes, third-party efforts’: the tobacco industry and the Tea Party Amanda Fallin, Rachel Grana, Stanton A Glantz ▸ Additional material is ABSTRACT Tea Party tax protests in April 2009,10 the town hall published online only. To view Background The Tea Party, which gained prominence protests about the proposed healthcare reform in please visit the journal online in the USA in 2009, advocates limited government and August 20091 and the Taxpayers’ March on (http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/ 11 tobaccocontrol-2012-050815). low taxes. Tea Party organisations, particularly Washington the following September 2009. They Americans for Prosperity and FreedomWorks, oppose continued to facilitate and support many of the Department of Medicine, University of California smoke-free laws and tobacco taxes. local chapters and leaders that arose from the early 5 San Francisco, Center for Methods We used the Legacy Tobacco Documents events in 2009. AFP and FreedomWorks continued Tobacco Control Research and Library, the Wayback Machine, Google, LexisNexis, the to facilitate local Tea Party activities by Education, San Francisco, Center for Media and Democracy and the Center for co-sponsoring rallies,11213creating talking points California, USA Responsive Politics (opensecrets.org) to examine the and organisational tips for supporters,14 15 supply- 16 Correspondence to tobacco companies’ connections to the Tea Party. ing literature for local Tea Party groups and pro- Stanton A Glantz, Department Results Starting in the 1980s, tobacco companies viding training sessions.1317FreedomWorks was a of Medicine, University of worked to create the appearance of broad opposition to founding partner of the 2010 Contract from California San Francisco, tobacco control policies by attempting to create a America (recalling the Republican Party’s 1994 Center for Tobacco Control ’ 18 Research and Education, Room grassroots smokers rights movement.
    [Show full text]
  • The Future of the Evangelical-Republican Coalition
    Excerpt • Temple University Press Introduction Paul A. Djupe Ryan L. Claassen hat is a crackup? Dictionaries offer a range of meanings. Oxford Living Dictionaries reports “crack up” as a phrasal verb meaning to “suffer W an emotional breakdown under pressure” or to “burst into laughter.”1 Merriam-Webster adds “to damage.”2 It is safe to say that the state of the re- lationship between the Republican Party and white evangelicals is no laugh- ing matter and that our meaning tracks best with “strain.”3 As 2016 ticked along, we wondered whether the Republican Party was on a path that would strain, damage, or destroy the coalition with evangelicals. The election re- sults, however, saw evangelicals double-down on Republican loyalty. When we began to write this book, we were confronted with a rather unexpected fact pattern. The unusual events of 2016 shined new light on the political priorities of evangelicals and what they expect from the Republican Party. Whether there was a crackup or not, 2016 was a gift to those who study reli- gion and politics. The unprecedented candidates and events of the presidential election let us see seams that had not been exposed for decades. Put differently, when evangelicals do things that are consistent with Republican priorities and Re- publicans do things that are consistent with evangelical priorities, it is al- most impossible to study what causes what. The 2016 election was different. It presented evangelical elites advocating against Republicans, Republican infighting, a Republican nominee far from evangelical orthodoxy, and can- didates other than the eventual winner with far better conservative Chris- tian bona fides.
    [Show full text]