DOCSLIB.ORG

Attachment-E DUMPING OPERATIONS

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Attachment-E DUMPING OPERATIONS Attachment-E DUMPING OPERATIONS DUMPING AT SEA PERMIT APPLICATION Fenit Harbour, Tralee, Co. Kerry Attachment E Dumping Operations CONTENTS E.1 DUMPING SITE SELECTION REPORT E.2 GENERAL INFORMATION E.2 (I) Characteristics of the dumping site(s) E.2 (II) Location of the dumping site E.3 DETAILS OF THE DUMPING OPERATION E.3 (I) Date of commencement and duration of the dumping operations E.3 (II) Name and address of operator contracted to carry out the dumping at sea (if known) E.3 (III) Location and method of dumping E.3 (IV) Total quantities (in tonnes (wet weight) and cubic meters) to be dumped per day/ week/month. Attachment E.1(I) Dump site Selection Report (MWP 2015) Attachment E.2(I) Marine Benthic Study Fenit Harbour Dredging and Disposal Operations (Aquafact 2018) Page 1 of 6 Attachment E Dumping Operations E.1 DUMPING SITE SELECTION The proposed dump site for the future dredging campaign is the same as that used by Fenit Harbour and Marina for disposal of dredged materials arising from the maintenance dredging campaign undertaken in 2016 and in previous campaigns back to 1996. The use of the dumpsite within Tralee Bay had evolved historically overtime and was influenced by local fisheries knowledge, navigation and guidance from the management team in Fenit Harbour. Historically Dumping At Sea Permits were issued by the Department of Marine and those permits did not have the benefit of a detailed site selection process. The preparation of the DAS permit application in 2014 included a comprehensive site selection process to ensure the suitability of the dumpsite. The dump site selection process was driven by constraints analysis and an iterative process where potential locations were examined and either discounted or investigated further. Prior to its final selection a number of assessments at the dumpsite were undertaken including: . Baseline bathymetry undertaken by Hydrographic Surveys Ltd to establish the bed profile. Current speed and direction assessment undertaken by Hydrographic Surveys Ltd. Underwater Archaeological Impact Assessment completed by Lar Dunne Archaeology . Baseline Characterisation Report completed by Aquafact . Sediment Transport Model completed by Aquafact . Sediment sampling from the proposed dredge material within the harbour and analysis of same by RPS Laboratories . Natura Impact Statement (NIS) addressing both the dredge location and the proposed dumpsite location. A copy of the site selection report completed in 2014/2015 is included in Attachment E.1(I). Given the short timeframe since the last dumping activities, the site characteristics of the existing dumpsite would not be expected to have changed significantly in the intervening period so historical studies undertaken relating to the dumpsite and its selection are deemed to be relevant. Notwithstanding this, prior to the selection of the existing dumpsite as the proposed site for disposal of sediments arising from future maintenance dredging campaign, a number of further surveys have been undertaken. These include: Benthic survey of the dump site completed by Aquafact Site Characterisation Report and sediment sampling completed by Aquafact Updated Archaeological Report completed by Lar Dunne Archaeology Updated Marine Mammal Risk Assessment by IWDG The reports were completed by the same consultant specialists who completed studies as part of the Dumpsite Selection Report of 2014/2015. AQUAFACT International Services Ltd carried out a benthic survey of the dump site in 2018. The survey identifies variations in the community type and dominating species between the sampling stations. These local variations are common in the natural environment. This would suggest that the past dumping activities had no long term impact on the general environment within the dump site. A copy of this report is included in Attachment E.2(I). Page 2 of 6 Attachment E Dumping Operations Nothing of archaeological interest was found during the underwater archaeological assessment of the dumpsite in 2015. The report of the Marine Mammal Observer indicates that the dumping of dredged material did not have a significant impact on marine mammals in the area. E.2 GENERAL INFORMATION E.2 (I) Characteristics of the dumping site(s) Distance from nearest shore The dumpsite is located approximately 3km west of the coast at Carrahane Lower townland and approximately 1.5km north-northwest of Fenit Island in the outer part of Tralee Bay. It lies between 1.5km to 2.5km south and southeast of Illaunnabarnagh and Mucklaghmore Islands Average, minimum and maximum depth of water (referenced to OD Malin); Depths within the dumpsite range between 16.4 and 19.6m and outside the dumpsite they ranged from 13.7 to 19.1m. Sediment characteristics The sediment type in the disposal site consists of fine/medium sand, coarse/medium sand and gravelly coarse sand and sandy gravel. Areas of hard ground occur in the western half. Very fine sand dominate just over 1km south of the dumpsite. Fine/very fine sand dominate to the east of the dumpsite and a gravelly coarse/very coarse sand dominate to the north. All sediments were classified as sand, gravelly sand or sandy gravel by Folk (1954). Silt-clay fractions were low throughout (<10%). Further details are provided in the Marine Benthic Study of the dumpsite undertaken by Aquafact. (See Attachment E.2 (I)). Nature of seabed habitats The faunal assemblage of the dumpsite and surrounding areas can be classified by Fossitt (2000) as SS1 Infralittoral gravels and sands. Variations in the community type and dominating species between the stations was evident. These local variations are common in the natural environment. All species observed are typically of the gravelly/sandy habitat in the area. Some of the main dominants of the assemblage include the bivalve Spisula subtruncata and the polychaetes Magelona johnstoni, Nephtys sp. and Syllis pontxioi. Further details are provided in the Marine Benthic Study of the dumpsite undertaken by Aquafact. (See Attachment E.2 (I)). Current/flow/tidal regime; etc. Tidal currents are generally low at the dump site. The current largest velocities occur at mid ebb and mid flood with magnitudes ranging from 0.2 to 0.3 m/s. Past Disposal at the dumpsite The dumpsite was previously used as the disposal site for the dredging campaign at Fenit Harbour undertaken in 2016. The volume of material dumped was 130,000 tonnes. Page 3 of 6 Attachment E Dumping Operations E.2 (II) Location of the dumping site Co-ordinates from the corners of the dump site areas are set out in Table 1 below. A chart outlining its position is shown in Figure 1 below and in Drawing No. 18598-5005A Table 1 Co-ordinates of Dumping at sea location WGS84 datum ITM Latitude Longitude Easting Northing (dd mm.mmm) (dd mm.mmm) (TL) 52 19.43938 9 54.34701 470091 620862 (TR) 52 19.453516 9 53.467316 471091 620862 (BR) 52 18.9145 9 53.444 471091 619862 (BL) 52 18.90036 9 54.32385 470091 619862 Figure 1 Location of spoil disposal site Page 4 of 6 Attachment E Dumping Operations E.3 DETAILS OF THE DUMPING OPERATION E.3 (I) Date of commencement and duration of the dumping operations The commencement date is unknown at this juncture as it is subject to the grant of the foreshore licence and dumping at sea permits. Operations will commence as rapidly as possible after the required licence and permit have been issued and a contractor appointed. Table 1 sets out an anticipated dumping schedule. It is envisaged that in Year 1 dumping will take place over a 4-6 week period, and annually thereafter over a 3-4 week period. Dumping activities are envisaged to take place typically between February- May annually. E.3 (II) Name and address of operator contracted to carry out the dumping at sea (if known) Currently unknown. Contractor not yet appointed. E.3 (III) Location and method of dumping Location as described and shown in Section E.2 (II). Method of dumping will be undertaken by releasing the dredged material by opening the hatches in the bottom of the dredging vessel. The area over which the dredger deposit each load is recorded with co-ordinates and the volume deposited is noted. Deposition is undertaken at optimum times of the tide, within good weather windows. There will also be monitoring of the plume at the deposition site as part of normal good practice. Once the dredger is finished the disposal process it then returns back to port and recommences the dredging operation The hydrodynamic modelling assessment undertaken for the 2016 permit, shows that less than 20% of the material will deposit and stay within the dumpsite location and the remainder will re-disperse within the wider and outer bay area. Given that material is not contaminated and occurs within the bay, then the fact that the majority re-disperses within the dumpsite area and the wider bay should have no negative effects, as in effect the dredging and deposition process is mimicking what occurs naturally in the system. Any temporary deposition of material will not have a detrimental effect on faunal communities within the habitat. Page 5 of 6 Attachment E Dumping Operations E.3 (IV) Total quantities (in tonnes (wet weight) and cubic meters) to be dumped per day/ week/month. Table 1 Approximate estimates of material be dumped on an weekly basis Total Volume to be Dumped Estimated Estimated Volume per Week Dumping duration Year (Tonnes) m3 (tonnes) m3 1 250,000 156,250 4-6 weeks 40,000 – 65,000 25,000 – 40,500 2 100,000 62,500 3-4 weeks 25,000 – 33,500 15,500 – 21,000 3 150,000 93,750
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Response to Oxygen Deficiency (Depletion): Bivalve Assemblages As an Indicator of Ecosystem Instability in the Northern Adriatic Sea
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE Response to oxygen deficiency (depletion): Bivalve assemblages as an indicator of ecosystem instability in the northern Adriatic Sea Vedrana NERLOVIĆ1, Alper DOĞAN2 & Mirjana HRS-BRENKO1 1Ruđer Bošković Institute, Centre for Marine Research, Giordano Paliaga 5, HR-52210 Rovinj, Croatia e-mail: [email protected] 2 Department of Hydrobiology, Faculty of Fisheries, Ege University, 35100 Bornova, Izmir, Turkey e-mail: [email protected] Abstract: Benthic communities represent a powerful tool for the detection of natural and anthropogenic disturbances, as well as for the assessment of marine ecosystem stability. This paper shows that Bivalve assemblages could serve as excellent indicators of disturbance and ecosystem instability. The goal of this study was to compare two sets of data in order to determine the differences between two different periods belonging to Bivalve assemblage in the muddy detritic bottom of the northern Adriatic Sea in the post-anoxic period during December 1989, 1990, 1991 and quite a while later, during 2003, 2004 and 2005. Abundances of some indicator species such as Corbula gibba, Modiolarca subpicta, and Timoclea ovata were detected during the post-anoxic period. Recruitment in the quality of Bivalve assemblages was proved by the ecologic and biotic indexes during 2003, 2004 and 2005, during a period of relatively stable ecological conditions. Fluctuation in Bivalve diversity due to the ecological quality of the marine ecosystem in the eastern part of the northern Adriatic Sea is also discussed. Key words: hypoxia; Bivalve assemblages; indicator species; soft bottoms; northern Adriatic Sea Introduction Recent reviews and summaries have provided good introductions on how hypoxia and anoxia came to be such a large and serious problem in the aquatic ecosystem (Gray et al.
    [Show full text]
  • High Level Environmental Screening Study for Offshore Wind Farm Developments – Marine Habitats and Species Project
    High Level Environmental Screening Study for Offshore Wind Farm Developments – Marine Habitats and Species Project AEA Technology, Environment Contract: W/35/00632/00/00 For: The Department of Trade and Industry New & Renewable Energy Programme Report issued 30 August 2002 (Version with minor corrections 16 September 2002) Keith Hiscock, Harvey Tyler-Walters and Hugh Jones Reference: Hiscock, K., Tyler-Walters, H. & Jones, H. 2002. High Level Environmental Screening Study for Offshore Wind Farm Developments – Marine Habitats and Species Project. Report from the Marine Biological Association to The Department of Trade and Industry New & Renewable Energy Programme. (AEA Technology, Environment Contract: W/35/00632/00/00.) Correspondence: Dr. K. Hiscock, The Laboratory, Citadel Hill, Plymouth, PL1 2PB. [email protected] High level environmental screening study for offshore wind farm developments – marine habitats and species ii High level environmental screening study for offshore wind farm developments – marine habitats and species Title: High Level Environmental Screening Study for Offshore Wind Farm Developments – Marine Habitats and Species Project. Contract Report: W/35/00632/00/00. Client: Department of Trade and Industry (New & Renewable Energy Programme) Contract management: AEA Technology, Environment. Date of contract issue: 22/07/2002 Level of report issue: Final Confidentiality: Distribution at discretion of DTI before Consultation report published then no restriction. Distribution: Two copies and electronic file to DTI (Mr S. Payne, Offshore Renewables Planning). One copy to MBA library. Prepared by: Dr. K. Hiscock, Dr. H. Tyler-Walters & Hugh Jones Authorization: Project Director: Dr. Keith Hiscock Date: Signature: MBA Director: Prof. S. Hawkins Date: Signature: This report can be referred to as follows: Hiscock, K., Tyler-Walters, H.
    [Show full text]
  • Ring Test Bulletin – RTB#52
    www.nmbaqcs.org Ring Test Bulletin – RTB#52 Tim Worsfold David Hall Søren Pears (Images) APEM Ltd. March 2017 E-mail: [email protected] RING TEST DETAILS Ring Test #52 Type/Contents – Targeted - Bivalvia Circulated – 12/11/16 Results deadline – 16/12/16 Number of Subscribing Laboratories – 24 Number of Participating Laboratories – 21 Number of Results Received – 21* *multiple data entries per laboratory permitted Summary of differences Total differences for 21 Specimen Genus Species Size returns Genus Species RT5201 Thyasira flexuosa 2-3mm 0 1 RT5202 Abra alba 10mm 0 1 RT5203 Cochlodesma praetenue 3-5mm 5 5 RT5204 Thyasira equalis 2-4mm 3 9 RT5205 Abra nitida 4-6mm 0 1 RT5206 Fabulina fabula 3-5mm 1 1 RT5207 Cerastoderma edule 1mm 6 13 RT5208 Tellimya ferruginosa 3-4mm 0 0 RT5209 Nucula nucleus 8-9mm 0 3 RT5210 Nucula nitidosa 2-3mm 1 3 RT5211 Asbjornsenia pygmaea 2-3mm 1 1 RT5212 Abra prismatica 3-5mm 1 1 RT5213 Chamelea striatula 3-4mm 7 9 RT5214 Montacuta substriata 1-2mm 5 5 RT5215 Spisula subtruncata 1mm 4 6 RT5216 Adontorhina similis 1-2mm 4 4 RT5217 Goodallia triangularis 1-2mm 0 0 RT5218 Scrobicularia plana 1mm 20 20 RT5219 Cerastoderma edule 2-3mm 9 13 RT5220 Arctica islandica 1mm 4 4 RT5221 Kurtiella bidentata 2-3mm 2 2 RT5222 Venerupis corrugata 2-3mm 9 9 RT5223 Barnea parva 10-20mm 0 0 RT5224 Abra alba 4-5mm 1 2 RT5225 Nucula nucleus 2mm 0 11 Total differences 83 124 Average 4.0 5.9 differences /lab. NMBAQC RT#52 bulletin Differences 10 15 20 25 0 5 Arranged in order of increasing number of differences (by specific followed by generic errors).
    [Show full text]
  • Attachments Table of Contents
    ATTACHMENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS FORESHORE LICENCE APPLICATION Fenit Harbour, Tralee, Co. Kerry ATTACHMENT CONTENTS Attachment A Figure 1 proximity to sensitive shellfish areas Attachment B B.1 Sediment Chemistry Results Attachment B.1(I) Dumping at Sea Material Analysis Reporting Form Attachment B.1(II) Copies of the laboratory reports Attachment B.1(III) Comparison to Irish Action Level B.2 Characteristics /Composition of the Substance or Material for Disposal Attachment B.2 Sediment Characterisation Report (AQUAFACT, 2018) Attachment C Assessment of Alternatives Attachment D D.1 Purpose Of The Operation D.2 Loading Areas D.3 Details Of The Loading Operations Attachment E E.1 DUMPING SITE SELECTION E.2 GENERAL INFORMATION E.3 DETAILS OF THE DUMPING OPERATION Attachment E.1(I) Attachment E.2(I) Marine Benthic Study Fenit Harbour Dredging and Disposal Operations (Aquafact 2018) Attachment F F.1 Assessment of Impact on the Environment Appendix 1 Assessment of Risk to Marine Mammals from Proposed Dredging and Dumping at Sea Activity, Fenit Harbour, Co. Kerry. Appendix 2 Underwater Archaeological Impact Assessment Report Fenit Harbour and Tralee Bay, Co. Kerry. Appendix 3: Nature Impact Statement Attachment G G.1 Monitoring Programme Attachment-A FIGURE 1 SHELLFISH WATERS FORESHORE LICENCE APPLICATION Fenit Harbour, Tralee, Co. Kerry Legend Foreshore Licence Area Shellfish Area 5091m Proposed Dump Site 4 89m Fenit Harbour Map Reproduced From Ordnance Survey Ireland By Permission Of The Government. Licence Number EN 0015719. 0 1.5 3 km Ü Project Title: Fenit Harbour Client: Kerry County Council Drawing Title: Foreshore Licence and Shellfish Areas Drawn: JK Checked: CF Date: 15-10-2019 Scale (A4): 1:85,000 Attachment-B MATERIAL ANALYSIS DUMPING AT SEA PERMIT APPLICATION Fenit Harbour, Tralee, Co.
    [Show full text]
  • Supplementary Tales
    Metabarcoding reveals different zooplankton communities in northern and southern areas of the North Sea Jan Niklas Macher, Berry B. van der Hoorn, Katja T. C. A. Peijnenburg, Lodewijk van Walraven, Willem Renema Supplementary tables 1-5 Table S1: Sampling stations and recorded abiotic variables recorded during the NICO 10 expedition from the Dutch Coast to the Shetland Islands Sampling site name Coordinates (°N, °E) Mean remperature (°C) Mean salinity (PSU) Depth (m) S74 59.416510, 0.499900 8.2 35.1 134 S37 58.1855556, 0.5016667 8.7 35.1 89 S93 57.36046, 0.57784 7.8 34.8 84 S22 56.5866667, 0.6905556 8.3 34.9 220 S109 56.06489, 1.59652 8.7 35 79 S130 55.62157, 2.38651 7.8 34.8 73 S156 54.88581, 3.69192 8.3 34.6 41 S176 54.41489, 4.04154 9.6 34.6 43 S203 53.76851, 4.76715 11.8 34.5 34 Table S2: Species list and read number per sampling site Class Order Family Genus Species S22 S37 S74 S93 S109 S130 S156 S176 S203 Copepoda Calanoida Acartiidae Acartia Acartia clausi 0 0 0 72 0 170 15 630 3995 Copepoda Calanoida Acartiidae Acartia Acartia tonsa 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 23 Hydrozoa Trachymedusae Rhopalonematidae Aglantha Aglantha digitale 0 0 0 0 1870 117 420 629 0 Actinopterygii Trachiniformes Ammodytidae Ammodytes Ammodytes marinus 0 0 0 0 0 263 0 35 0 Copepoda Harpacticoida Miraciidae Amphiascopsis Amphiascopsis cinctus 344 0 0 992 2477 2500 9574 8947 0 Ophiuroidea Amphilepidida Amphiuridae Amphiura Amphiura filiformis 0 0 0 0 219 0 0 1470 63233 Copepoda Calanoida Pontellidae Anomalocera Anomalocera patersoni 0 0 586 0 0 0 0 0 0 Bivalvia Venerida
    [Show full text]
  • Tralee Bay Wetlands Ecotourism Policy Contents 1. Mission
    1 Tralee Bay Wetlands Ecotourism Policy Contents 1. Mission Statement 2 2. Implementation 2 3. Interpretation and education 6 4. Contributing to conservation 7 5. Benefiting local communities 9 6. Visitor satisfaction 11 7. Responsible marketing and communication 13 8. Cultural respect and awareness 14 1 2 Ecotourism can be defined as responsible travel that offers visitors an opportunity to experience and learn about the natural environment, history, and culture of a region. Our aim at Tralee Bay Wetlands is to introduce visitors to the beautiful cultural and natural heritage of the Tralee Bay area and to raise awareness of environmental and conservation issues in general. The key point is the issue of “responsible” travel, and we are committed to actively promoting the conservation of our environment, through our own environmental practices, through our interactions within our community, and through our education and interpretation activities. Our commitment to the principles of ecotourism can be categorised under the following headings. 1. Environmentally Sustainable Practices Appropriate minimal impact codes identified and adopted All walking routes throughout the grounds of the centre are protected by gravel/asphalt paths and visitors are not encouraged to walk across the more vulnerable areas of the facility (particularly the wetland). A timber walkway has been constructed to allow visitors and particularly educational groups access to the wetland itself, while still protecting the fragile terrain. In order to minimise disturbance to the wildlife, the tour boats are propelled by electric engines which are virtually silent, as well as emission-free. Bird hides have been built at either end of the wetland to allow visitors to observe the bird life without impacting on it.
    [Show full text]
  • T.C. Ordu Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü Orta
    T.C. ORDU ÜNİVERSİTESİ FEN BİLİMLERİ ENSTİTÜSÜ ORTA KARADENİZ’DEKİ MOLLUSCA FAUNASI VE KATALOGLANMASI MUSTAFA BİÇER Bu tez, Balıkçılık Teknolojisi Mühendisliği Anabilim Dalında Yüksek Lisans derecesi için hazırlanmıştır. ORDU 2014 TEZ BİLDİRİMİ Tez yazım kurallarına uygun olarak hazırlanan bu tezin yazılmasında bilimsel ahlak kurallarına uyulduğunu, başkalarının eserlerinden yararlanılması durumunda bilimsel normlara uygun olarak atıfta bulunulduğunu, tezin içerdiği yenilik ve sonuçların başka bir yerden alınmadığını, kullanılan verilerde herhangi bir tahrifat yapılmadığını, tezin herhangi bir kısmının bu üniversite veya başka bir üniversitedeki başka bir tez çalışması olarak sunulmadığını beyan ederim. İmza Mustafa BİÇER Not: Bu tezde kullanılan özgün ve başka kaynaktan yapılan bildirişlerin, çizelge, şekil ve fotoğrafların kaynak gösterilmeden kullanımı, 5846 sayılı Fikir ve Sanat Eserleri Kanunundaki hükümlere tabidir. I ÖZET ORTA KARADENİZ’ DEKİ MOLLUSCA FAUNASI VE KATALOGLANMASI Mustafa BİÇER Ordu Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü Balıkçılık Teknolojisi Mühendisliği Anabilim Dalı, 2014 Yüksek Lisans Tezi, 60s Danışman: Yrd. Doç. Dr. Mehmet AYDIN Bu çalışma ile Orta Karadeniz’de birçok sayıda familya ve cins ile temsil edilen mollusca sınıfına ait türlerin Ordu İlindeki dağılımının belirlenmesi ve araştırılması amaçlanmıştır. Mollusca türlerini tespit etmek amacıyla gerçekleştirilen bu çalışmada, derinlikleri 0-25 m arasında değişen 14 istasyondan örneklemeler yapılmıştır. Araştırma mediolittoral bölgeden elle, dalarak ve el direcleri
    [Show full text]
  • Fenit Port & Marina
    Fenit Port & Marina For centuries the Old Port of Fenit was Barrow Harbour. The port was key in medieval times to monastic settlements in Ardfert. Blennerville Quay became the primary area port built in the middle of the 17th century until silting compromised its viability. Tralee Ship Canal, a town port was completed in 1846, superseding Blennerville, but before long silting and the increasing size of incoming ships doomed its viability. A deep-water port was established in Fenit in the late 1880’s. The modern-day Fenit Viaduct & Harbour was upgraded in the early 1950’s. The old wooden structure was replaced when it was discovered that during construction some wooden piles hadn’t been treated with creosote. The non-creosoted piles were damaged by sea worms and were rotting leaving the pier in a dangerous condition.2 The old wooden structure was replaced and opened in 1955. Fenit remains an important international port to this day, and the modern structure includes a deep sea pier of approximately 175 meters. Data Sources: Source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fenit Keenan Desmond, ‘Post-Famine Ireland: Social Structure: Ireland as it Really Was’ (2006) 2 The Kerry Sentinal, August 19, 1893. Dangerous Condition of the Fenit Pier. From the records of Bridie Brassil, local historian & folklorist. Fenit Pier Fenit Pier is about 500 The late 19th century Today the pier connects the metres from the village. It wooden structure was mainland and Great Samphire Rock was constructed between replaced in the 1950’s around which the port and marina 1882-18891 a wooden by the current 800 are constructed.
    [Show full text]
  • Kerry Scheme Details 2019.Xlsx
    Organisation Name Scheme Code Scheme Name Supply Type Source Type Population Served Volume Supplied Scheme Start Date Scheme End Date Kerry County Council 1300PUB1032 An Baile Mór PWS 012D PWS Mixture 825 543 01/01/2009 00:00 Kerry County Council 1300PUB1027 An Clochán PWS 028D PWS GR 170 152 01/01/2009 00:00 Kerry County Council 1300PUB1034 An Daingean PWS 030D PWS Mixture 1723 1861 01/01/2009 00:00 Kerry County Council 1300PUB1037 An Fheothanach PWS PWS GR 210 137 01/01/2009 00:00 Kerry County Council 1300PUB1111 An Ghráig/Cloichear PWS 043D PWS Mixture 86 106 01/01/2009 00:00 21/05/2019 00:00 Kerry County Council 1300PUB1042 An Mhín Aird No. 1 PWS (060D) PWS Mixture 396 456 01/01/2009 00:00 Kerry County Council 1300PUB1116 An Mhín Aird No. 3 PWSS (090D) PWS Mixture 576 458 01/01/2009 00:00 Kerry County Council 1300PUB1044 An Mhuiríoch/ Baile Breach PWS 063D PWS Mixture 527 455 01/01/2009 00:00 Kerry County Council 1300PUB1029 Annascaul PWS 002D PWS GR 453 154 01/01/2009 00:00 Kerry County Council 1300PUB1002 Ardfert PWS GR 2394 1286 01/01/2009 00:00 Kerry County Council 1300PUB1022 Aughacasla PWS 005D PWS Mixture 342 268 01/01/2009 00:00 Kerry County Council 1300PUB1031 Baile An Fheirtéaraigh PWS 011D PWS GR 465 353 01/01/2009 00:00 Kerry County Council 1300PUB1030 Baile Na Bhfionnúrach PWS 006D PWS Mixture 58 26 01/01/2009 00:00 20/12/2019 00:00 Kerry County Council 1300PUB3002 Ballintermon 003D PWS GR 240 148 01/01/2014 00:00 Kerry County Council 1300PUB1001 Ballyheigue PWS Mixture 2466 2842 01/01/2009 00:00 Kerry County Council
    [Show full text]
  • Tralee Bay and Magharees Peninsula, West to Cloghane SAC (Site Code 2070) Conservation Objectives Supporting Document -Coastal Habitats
    Tralee Bay and Magharees Peninsula, West to Cloghane SAC (site code 2070) Conservation objectives supporting document -coastal habitats NPWS Version 1 October 2013 Table of Contents Page No. 1 Introduction 3 2 Conservation objectives 6 3 Perennial vegetation of stony banks 7 3.1 Overall objective 7 3.2 Area 7 3.2.1 Habitat extent 7 3.3 Range 8 3.3.1 Habitat distribution 8 3.4 Structure and Functions 8 3.4.1 Functionality and sediment supply 8 3.4.2 Vegetation structure: zonation 9 3.4.3 Vegetation composition: typical species & sub-communities 9 3.4.4 Vegetation composition: negative indicator species 10 4 Saltmarsh habitats 10 4.1 Overall objectives 11 4.2 Area 11 4.2.1 Habitat extent 11 4.3 Range 12 4.3.1 Habitat distribution 12 4.4 Structure and Functions 13 4.4.1 Physical structure: sediment supply 13 4.4.2 Physical structure: creeks and pans 13 4.4.3 Physical structure: flooding regime 14 4.4.4 Vegetation structure: zonation 14 4.4.5 Vegetation structure: vegetation height 14 4.4.6 Vegetation structure: vegetation cover 14 4.4.7 Vegetation composition: typical species & sub-communities 15 4.4.8 Vegetation composition: negative indicator species 16 5 Sand dune habitats 16 5.1 Overall objectives 18 5.2 Area 19 5.2.1 Habitat extent 19 5.3 Range 20 5.3.1 Habitat distribution 20 5.4 Structure and Functions 20 5.4.1 Physical structure: functionality and sediment supply 20 5.4.2 Physical structure: hydrological & flooding regime 22 5.4.3 Vegetation structure: zonation 22 1 5.4.4 Vegetation structure: bare ground 23 5.4.5 Vegetation composition:
    [Show full text]
  • TREATISE ONLINE Number 48
    TREATISE ONLINE Number 48 Part N, Revised, Volume 1, Chapter 31: Illustrated Glossary of the Bivalvia Joseph G. Carter, Peter J. Harries, Nikolaus Malchus, André F. Sartori, Laurie C. Anderson, Rüdiger Bieler, Arthur E. Bogan, Eugene V. Coan, John C. W. Cope, Simon M. Cragg, José R. García-March, Jørgen Hylleberg, Patricia Kelley, Karl Kleemann, Jiří Kříž, Christopher McRoberts, Paula M. Mikkelsen, John Pojeta, Jr., Peter W. Skelton, Ilya Tëmkin, Thomas Yancey, and Alexandra Zieritz 2012 Lawrence, Kansas, USA ISSN 2153-4012 (online) paleo.ku.edu/treatiseonline PART N, REVISED, VOLUME 1, CHAPTER 31: ILLUSTRATED GLOSSARY OF THE BIVALVIA JOSEPH G. CARTER,1 PETER J. HARRIES,2 NIKOLAUS MALCHUS,3 ANDRÉ F. SARTORI,4 LAURIE C. ANDERSON,5 RÜDIGER BIELER,6 ARTHUR E. BOGAN,7 EUGENE V. COAN,8 JOHN C. W. COPE,9 SIMON M. CRAgg,10 JOSÉ R. GARCÍA-MARCH,11 JØRGEN HYLLEBERG,12 PATRICIA KELLEY,13 KARL KLEEMAnn,14 JIřÍ KřÍž,15 CHRISTOPHER MCROBERTS,16 PAULA M. MIKKELSEN,17 JOHN POJETA, JR.,18 PETER W. SKELTON,19 ILYA TËMKIN,20 THOMAS YAncEY,21 and ALEXANDRA ZIERITZ22 [1University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, USA, [email protected]; 2University of South Florida, Tampa, USA, [email protected], [email protected]; 3Institut Català de Paleontologia (ICP), Catalunya, Spain, [email protected], [email protected]; 4Field Museum of Natural History, Chicago, USA, [email protected]; 5South Dakota School of Mines and Technology, Rapid City, [email protected]; 6Field Museum of Natural History, Chicago, USA, [email protected]; 7North
    [Show full text]
  • Fenit - a Fossil Walk Fenit, Co
    Fenit - A Fossil Walk Fenit, Co. Kerry Fenit within (the island) and Fenit without (the peninsular village area) are underlain by Waulsortian Limestones.1 This generally pale-grey limestone was formed during the Carboniferous Period approximately 350 million years ago. 2 Today millions of years later the rocks provide us with insights into the many creatures that lived in Ireland all those years ago. 1 Spatial Resources – Bedrock Geology 100K. Geological Survey Ireland. Source: https://dcenr.maps.arcgis.com/apps/MapSeries/index.html?appid=a30af518e87a4c0ab2fbde2aaac3c228 2Geology of Ireland. Geological Survey Ireland. Source: https://www.gsi.ie/en-ie/geoscience- topics/geology/Pages/Geology-of-Ireland.aspx Fossils can be described as impressions or traces of remains of ancient organisms (animals or plants) from a past geologic age.1 Fossils are rocks with the impressions of former organisms. Fossils are not the ancient organisms themselves.2 On a coastal walk in Ireland most of the fossils evident in rocks are of marine animals without a vertebral column (invertebrates), such as sea- lilies, corals, and bivalves.3 In the Fenit area Crinoid Columnals and Ammonite are numerous. 1 Fossil Definition. Source: https://www.britannica.com/science/fossil 2 Fossil Definition. Source: https://www.nationalgeographic.org/encyclopedia/fossil/ 3 The Strange Creatures that Lived in Ireland Millions of Years Ago. RTE – Brainstorm, 2019. Source: https://www.rte.ie/brainstorm/2019/1113/1090543-the-strange- creatures-that-lived-in-ireland-millions-of-years-ago/ Given the beautiful surrounds of Fenit it is not surprising that we might forget to look under our feet! On the Wild Atlantic Way, Fenit village and its surroundings look out on the iconic Little Samphire Lighthouse, the breathtaking beauty of Tralee Bay, Barrow Harbour, Fenit Island, the Maharees, Slieve Mish Mountains, Brandon Range, and Kerry Head.
    [Show full text]