DOCSLIB.ORG

Alternatives Screening Technical Report

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Alternatives Screening Technical Report Interstate 10/Interstate 17 Corridor Master Plan (FY 2014) Alternatives Screening Technical Report September 12, 2017 © 2017, All rights reserved Disclaimer Locations of improvements in this report are conceptual in nature and subject to additional study, review and approval by the Arizona Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration and appropriate municipal jurisdiction. Final project alignments and rights-of-way will be determined following completion of appropriate planning, environmental and design studies. While every effort has been made to ensure the accuracy of this information, the Maricopa Association of Governments makes no warranty, expressed or implied, as to its accuracy and expressly disclaims liability for the accuracy thereof. This page is intentionally left blank. Interstate 10/Interstate 17 Corridor Master Plan (FY 2014) Alternatives Screening Technical Report Maricopa Association of Governments 302 North 1st Avenue, #300 Phoenix, Arizona 85003 MAG Contract #585 Prepared by HDR 3200 East Camelback Road, #350 Phoenix, Arizona 85018 September 12, 2017 © 2017, All rights reserved This report was funded in part through grant(s) from the Federal Highway Administration and/or Federal Transit Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation. The contents of this report reflect the views and opinions of the author(s), who is responsible for the facts and accuracy of the data presented herein. The contents do not necessarily state or reflect the official views or policies of the U.S. Department of Transportation, the Arizona Department of Transportation or any other state or federal agency. This report does not constitute a standard, specification or regulation. Disclaimer Locations of improvements in this report are conceptual in nature and subject to additional study, review and approval by the Arizona Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration and appropriate municipal jurisdiction. Final project alignments and rights-of-way will be determined following completion of appropriate planning, environmental and design studies. While every effort has been made to ensure the accuracy of this information, the Maricopa Association of Governments makes no warranty, expressed or implied, as to its accuracy and expressly disclaims liability for the accuracy thereof. This page is intentionally left blank. Contents 1 Executive Summary ......................................................................................................................................................................... 1-1 6 Recommended Alternative ........................................................................................................................................................... 6-1 1.1 Study Overview .................................................................................................................................................................... 1-1 6.1 Purpose and Need Overview .......................................................................................................................................... 6-1 1.2 Summary of Meetings ....................................................................................................................................................... 1-3 6.2 Features of the Recommended Alternative, by Segment ................................................................................... 6-1 1.3 Alternatives Development ............................................................................................................................................... 1-3 6.3 Operational Characteristics of the Recommended Alternative ...................................................................... 6-39 1.4 Alternatives Screening ...................................................................................................................................................... 1-3 6.4 Design Exceptions Associated with the Recommended Alternative ............................................................ 6-39 1.5 Agency and Public Feedback on the Recommended Alternative .................................................................... 1-5 6.5 Concept Plans Associated with the Recommended Alternative ..................................................................... 6-39 1.6 Recommended Alternative .............................................................................................................................................. 1-6 7 Technology Considerations ......................................................................................................................................................... 7-1 1.7 Implementation Strategy, Cost Opinions, and Planning and Environmental Linkages ......................... 1-11 7.1 Background and Document Purpose .......................................................................................................................... 7-1 2 Introduction and Background ..................................................................................................................................................... 2-1 7.2 Freeway Operations and Assets in the Spine Corridor ......................................................................................... 7-1 2.1 Study Overview .................................................................................................................................................................... 2-1 7.3 Arterial Operations and Assets in the Spine Corridor........................................................................................... 7-3 2.2 No-Build Alternative Assumptions ............................................................................................................................... 2-1 7.4 Coordinated Traffic Incident Management ............................................................................................................... 7-3 2.3 Local Transportation Plans and Initiatives ................................................................................................................. 2-3 7.5 Other Technology and Operations Initiatives in the MAG Region .................................................................. 7-4 2.4 Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century .................................................................................................... 2-5 7.6 Key Needs and Gaps to be Addressed in the Spine Corridor ........................................................................... 7-4 2.5 Project Management and Team Organization ........................................................................................................ 2-5 7.7 Operational and Technology Approaches for Spine Corridor ........................................................................... 7-5 2.6 Summary of Meetings ....................................................................................................................................................... 2-6 7.8 Implementation Recommendations and Cost Opinions ..................................................................................... 7-7 3 Initial Corridor Concepts ............................................................................................................................................................... 3-1 8 Implementation Strategy, Cost Opinions, and Planning and Environmental Linkages ........................................ 8-1 3.1 Introduction ........................................................................................................................................................................... 3-1 8.1 Implementation Strategy – Funded Projects ............................................................................................................ 8-1 3.2 Alternatives Development Workshop ......................................................................................................................... 3-1 8.2 Implementation Strategy – Unfunded Projects ....................................................................................................... 8-2 4 Screening Process ............................................................................................................................................................................ 4-1 8.3 Project Cost Opinions ........................................................................................................................................................ 8-2 4.1 Overview ................................................................................................................................................................................. 4-1 8.4 Planning and Environmental Linkages Questionnaire and Checklist ............................................................. 8-5 4.2 Level 1 Screening ................................................................................................................................................................ 4-2 4.3 Level 2 Screening .............................................................................................................................................................. 4-17 4.4 Level 3 Screening .............................................................................................................................................................. 4-59 4.5 Level 4 Screening .............................................................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Wells Fargo Commercial Mortgage Trust 2021-C60 As Issuing Entity Wells Fargo Commercial Mortgage Securities, Inc
    SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION FORM FWP Filing under Securities Act Rules 163/433 of free writing prospectuses Filing Date: 2021-07-08 SEC Accession No. 0001539497-21-000991 (HTML Version on secdatabase.com) SUBJECT COMPANY WELLS FARGO COMMERCIAL MORTGAGE TRUST Mailing Address Business Address 301 SOUTH COLLEGE 301 SOUTH COLLEGE 2021-C60 STREET STREET CHARLOTTE NC 28228-0166 CHARLOTTE NC 28228-0166 CIK:1867467| State of Incorp.:NC | Fiscal Year End: 1231 7043832556 Type: FWP | Act: 34 | File No.: 333-226486-21 | Film No.: 211080743 SIC: 6189 Asset-backed securities FILED BY WELLS FARGO COMMERCIAL MORTGAGE SECURITIES Mailing Address Business Address 301 SOUTH COLLEGE 301 SOUTH COLLEGE INC STREET STREET CHARLOTTE NC 28228-0166 CHARLOTTE NC 28228-0166 CIK:850779| IRS No.: 561643598 | State of Incorp.:NC | Fiscal Year End: 1231 7043832556 Type: FWP SIC: 6189 Asset-backed securities Copyright © 2021 www.secdatabase.com. All Rights Reserved. Please Consider the Environment Before Printing This Document FREE WRITING PROSPECTUS FILED PURSUANT TO RULE 433 REGISTRATION FILE NO.: 333-226486-21 Free Writing Prospectus Structural and Collateral Term Sheet $748,633,043 (Approximate Initial Pool Balance) Wells Fargo Commercial Mortgage Trust 2021-C60 as Issuing Entity Wells Fargo Commercial Mortgage Securities, Inc. as Depositor LMF Commercial, LLC Wells Fargo Bank, National Association Column Financial, Inc. UBS AG BSPRT CMBS Finance, LLC Ladder Capital Finance LLC as Sponsors and Mortgage Loan Sellers Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates Series 2021-C60 July 8, 2021 WELLS FARGO SECURITIES CREDIT SUISSE UBS SECURITIES LLC Co-Lead Manager and Co-Lead Manager and Co-Lead Manager and Joint Bookrunner Joint Bookrunner Joint Bookrunner Academy Securities Drexel Hamilton Siebert Williams Shank Co-Manager Co-Manager Co-Manager Copyright © 2021 www.secdatabase.com.
    [Show full text]
  • Alta/Nsps Land Title Survey N
    Wood, Patel & Associates, Inc. Civil Engineering Water Resources Land Survey LOOP 101 NOTES Construction Management 602.335.8500 1) ALL TITLE INFORMATION IS BASED ON A SPECIAL REPORT PREPARED AND ISSUED BY FIRST www.woodpatel.com 5+6' AMERICAN TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY, REPORT NO. NCS-1001603-PHX1, DATED FEBRUARY 10, 2020, RECEIVED ON FEBRUARY 14, 2020. UNION HILLS DRIVE 2) THE HORIZONTAL DATUM FOR THIS SURVEY IS BASED ON THE NATIONAL GEODETIC SURVEY N (NGS) WEBSITE "WWW.NGS.NOAA.GOV", ON FEBRUARY 18, 2020. SECTION 36, PROJECTION: ARIZONA CENTRAL ZONE, NAD 83, (EPOCH 2010) T.4N., R.4E. DATUM: GRS-80 PIMA ROAD UNITS: INTERNATIONAL FEET SCHEDULE "B" ITEMS HAYDEN ROAD GEOID MODEL: GEOID 18 PIMA ACC CONTROL POINT: 1HH2 1. Taxes for the full year of 2020. PID: AJ3694 (The first half is due October 1, 2020 and is delinquent November 1, 2020. The second half is due PRINCESS DRIVE LATITUDE: 33°41'03.5909"N March 1, 2021 and is delinquent May 1, 2021.) LONGITUDE: 111°56'34.1296"W ELLIPSOID HEIGHT: 489.71 (METERS) 2. Restrictions, dedications, conditions, reservations, easements and other matters shown on the plat DESCRIPTION: STAINLESS STEEL ROD IN SLEEVE of State Plat No. 16 - Core South, as recorded in Plat Book 324, Page(s) 50, but deleting any covenant, condition or restriction indicating a preference, limitation or discrimination based on MODIFIED TO GROUND AT (GRID) N: 963266.200, E: 702643.084, USING A SCALE FACTOR OF race, color, religion, sex, handicap, familial status or national origin to the extent such covenants, 1.0001706727.
    [Show full text]
  • Christopher L.White
    TABLE OF CONTENTS Page No. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ............................................................................................................................. i 1.0 INTRODUCTION .............................................................................................................................. 1 1.1 Project Authorization ...................................................................................................... 1 1.2 User Reliance ................................................................................................................... 1 1.3 Environmental Professional's Statement ...................................................................... 1 1.4 Purpose ............................................................................................................................ 1 1.5 Scope of Services ............................................................................................................ 2 2.0 PROPERTY AND AREA INFORMATION ......................................................................................... 2 2.1 Current Property Use and Occupancy ........................................................................... 2 2.2 Property Improvements and Features .......................................................................... 2 2.3 Utilities ............................................................................................................................. 3 2.4 Current Adjoining Property Use and Description .........................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Raintree Corporate Center Building I
    INVESTMENT OPPORTUNITY RAINTREE CORPORATE CENTER BUILDING I 8980 East Raintree Drive Scottsdale, AZ A premier multi-tenant office investment situated within the in the Scottsdale Airpark, the second largest employment center in Arizona INVESTMENT CONTACTS CAPITAL MARKETS ERIC WICHTERMAN Executive Managing Director +1 602 224 4471 [email protected] MIKE COOVER Managing Director +1 602 224 4473 [email protected] 2 / 8980 East Raintree TABLE OF CONTENTS 01 OFFERING SUMMARY 04 02 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 8 03 PROPERTY OVERVIEW 18 04 AREA OVERVIEW 26 05 MARKET INFORMATION 42 06 FINANCIAL ANALYSIS 50 / 3 01 OFFERING SUMMARY 4 / 8980 East Raintree / 5 THE OFFERING PROPERTY OVERVIEW Raintree Corporate Center Single-story freestanding office building in north Scottsdale. Building I Prominently situated along 90th Street, just north of Raintree Drive. 8980 East Raintree Drive in Scottsdale Arizona 85260 Parking is provided at a ratio of ±4 spaces per 1,000 square feet. NET RENTABLE AREA YEAR BUILT Attractive modern curb appeal. ±7,561 1999 Constructed in 1999 using decorative masonry block with steel accents. SQUARE FEET Ideally designed to accommodate small sized tenants that dominate the PARKING RATIO OCCUPANCY market. WITHIN COMPLEX 100% ±4:1,000 JOMAX ROAD DEER VALLEY HAPPY VALLEY ROAD HAPPY VALLEY ROAD PHOENIX DEER VALLEY MUNICIPAL AIRPORT PINNACLE PEAK ROAD PINNACLE PEAK ROAD PEORIA DEER VALLEY ROAD DESERT RIDGE M AY UNION HILLS DRIVE O B OULEVARD BELL ROAD 32ND STREET 32ND 40TH STREET CAVE CREEK ROAD CAVE SCOTTSDALE AIRPORT GREENWAY
    [Show full text]
  • Ordinance G-6214
    Offical Records of Maricopa County Recorder HELEN PURCELL 2016074946710/12/2016 03:37 ELECTRONIC RECORDING 6214G-5-1-1- ORDINANCE G-6214 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING DISTRICT MAP ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 601 OF THE CITY OF PHOENIX ORDINANCE BY CHANGING THE ZONING DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION FOR THE PARCEL DESCRIBED HEREIN (CASE Z-24-16-2) FROM C-0/G-0 HGTIWVR (COMMERCIAL OFFICE/GENERAL OFFCE OPTION, HEIGHT WAIVER) TO PUD (PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT) WITH ALL UNDERLYING USES. BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PHOENIX, as follows: SECTION 1. The zoning of an approximately 4.73 acre property located at the northwest corner of 16th Street and Wahalla Lane on a portion of Section 28, Township 4 North, Range 3 East, as described more specifically in Attachment "A," is hereby changed from "C-0/G-0 HGTIWVR" (Commercial Office/General Office option, Height Waiver) to "PUD" (Planned Unit Development). SECTION 2. The Planning and Development Director is instructed to modify the Zoning Map of the City of Phoenix to reflect this use district classification change as shown in Attachment "B." SECTION 3. Due to the site's specific physical conditions and the use district applied for by the applicant, this rezoning is subject to the following stipulations, violation of which shall be treated in the same manner as a violation of the City of Phoenix Zoning Ordinance: 1. An updated Development Narrative for the Luna Azul PUD reflecting the changes approved through this request shall be submitted to the Planning and Development Department within 30 days of City Council approval of this request.
    [Show full text]
  • US-60/Grand Avenue Corridor Optimization, Access Management, and System Study (COMPASS)
    US-60/Grand Avenue COMPASS Loop 303 to Interstate 10 TM 4 – Principles and Practices of Access Management US-60/Grand Avenue Corridor Optimization, Access Management, and System Study (COMPASS) Loop 303 to Interstate 10 Technical Memorandum 4 Principles and Practices of Access Management Prepared for: Prepared by: Wilson & Company, Inc. In Association With: Burgess & Niple, Inc. Partners for Strategic Action, Inc. Philip B. Demosthenes, LLC September 2014 9/30/2014 US-60/Grand Avenue COMPASS Loop 303 to Interstate 10 TM 4 – Principles and Practices of Access Management Table of Contents List of Abbreviations 1.0 Introduction ............................................................................................................................................................................................. 1 1.1. Purpose of this Paper ................................................................................................................................................................ 1 1.2. Study Area ..................................................................................................................................................................................... 2 1.3. Historical Perspective ................................................................................................................................................................ 4 1.4. Objectives of this Paper ...........................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Integrated Transportation Intends to Create a Range of Mobility Options That Are Safe and Efficient for All Types of Users
    Integrated Transportation intends to create a range of mobility options that are safe and efficient for all types of users. This theme provides policy guidance for the development, enhancement, beautification, and expansion of all current transportation options and explores yet‐to‐be‐identified emerging technologies. Peoria’s system includes the on‐street network, transit services, pedestrian and bicycle facilities (active transportation), and mobility‐as‐a‐service (MaaS). The goal of Integrated Transportation section is to provide a balanced approach for a variety of modes of travel that further broadens the system away from single‐occupant, self‐driven cars. Peoria aims to provide mobility solutions to schools, businesses, and services at the pedestrian, cyclist, mass transit, and automobile level. In order to address comfort levels for these users and the importance of regional connections, different implementations will be utilized in specific areas of Peoria. Pedestrian‐focused areas, like P83 at 83rd Avenue and Bell Road, and Old Town, at 83rd Avenue and Peoria Avenue will provide enhanced streetscape, placemaking, shading, and expansive sidewalk and cyclist facilities. Automobile‐ focused corridors, like Bell Road, Lake Pleasant Parkway, and Happy Valley Road will provide Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS) for efficient travel times, fixed and circulator bus options, and key connections to regional roadways and destinations. 4‐1 PURPOSE To holistically create a seamless network of mobility choices, through acknowledgement and dedication to continuing to foster and grow the on‐street roadways, off‐street shared use paths, transit options, and plan for advancing technologies. Transportation should be considered for all modes of travel and universally accessibility.
    [Show full text]
  • Revised Feb. 1, 2021*** Agenda Transportation, Infrastructure And
    ***Revised Feb. 1, 2021*** Item Revised: Item 12 Meeting Location: Agenda Phoenix Council Chambers 200 W. Jefferson St. Transportation, Infrastructure and Phoenix, AZ 85003 Innovation Subcommittee Wednesday, February 3, 2021 10:00 AM phoenix.gov OPTIONS TO ACCESS THIS MEETING - Watch the meeting live streamed on phoenix.gov or Phoenix Channel 11 on Cox Cable. - Call-in to listen to the meeting. Dial 602-666-0783 and Enter Meeting ID 126 207 1767# (for English) or 126 458 4228# (for Spanish). Press # again when prompted for attendee ID. - Register and speak during a meeting: - Register online by visiting the City Council Meetings page on phoenix.gov at least 1 hour prior to the start of this meeting. Then, click on this link at the time of the meeting and join the Webex to speak. https://phoenixcitycouncil.webex.com/phoenixcitycouncil/onstage/ g.php?MTID=e89977a4ef8c4d9d36d71cc53a65fa0ff - Register via telephone at 602-262-6001 at least 1 hour prior to the start of this meeting, noting the item number. Then, use the Call-in phone number and Meeting ID listed above at the time of the meeting to call-in and speak. City of Phoenix Printed on 1/27/2021 1 of 94 2 of 94 Transportation, Infrastructure and Agenda February 3, 2021 Innovation Subcommittee CALL TO ORDER 000 CALL TO THE PUBLIC MINUTES OF MEETINGS 1 Minutes of the Transportation, Infrastructure and Innovation Page 11 Subcommittee Meeting This item transmits the minutes of the Transportation, Infrastructure and Innovation Subcommittee Meeting on Jan. 6, 2021, for review, correction or approval by the Transportation, Infrastructure and Innovation Subcommittee.
    [Show full text]
  • Copyright ©Alexander S Lee 2019
    Combined Model Approach to the Problem of Ranking Item Type text; Electronic Dissertation Authors Lee, Alexander S. Publisher The University of Arizona. Rights Copyright © is held by the author. Digital access to this material is made possible by the University Libraries, University of Arizona. Further transmission, reproduction, presentation (such as public display or performance) of protected items is prohibited except with permission of the author. Download date 28/09/2021 08:08:32 Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/10150/631941 COMBINED MODEL APPROACH TO THE PROBLEM OF RANKING by Alexander S. Lee __________________________ Copyright ©Alexander S Lee 2019 A Dissertation Submitted to the Faculty of the DEPARTMENT OF SYSTEMS AND INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements For the Degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY In the Graduate College THE UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA 2019 2 3 STATEMENT BY AUTHOR This dissertation has been submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for an advanced degree at the University of Arizona and is deposited in the University Library to be made available to borrowers under rules of the Library. Brief quotations from this dissertation are allowable without special permission, provided that an accurate acknowledgement of the source is made. Requests for permission for extended quotation from or reproduction of this manuscript in whole or in part may be granted by the copyright holder. SIGNED: Alexander S. Lee 4 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Over the years since my first year at the University of Arizona, I met many mentors, colleagues, and friends. I am extremely thankful for the experiences that I gained for both my professional and personal growth.
    [Show full text]
  • Fiscal Year 2019/20 Arterial Life Cycle Program
    Item 15 cm Cornell REPORT Meeting Date: November 12, 2019 Charter Provision: Provide for orderly government and administration of the affairs of the city General Plan Goal: Adopt Budgets ACTION FY 2019/20 Arterial Life Cycle Program (ALCP) Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) Budget Adjustments. Adopt Resolution No. 11582 authorizing various FY 2019/20 CIP Budget Adjustments related to the ALCP. BACKGROUND The ALCP is managed by the Maricopa Association of Governments (MAG) as part of the Proposition 400-funded Regional Transportation Plan. The ALCP runs through FY 2025/26, when the current half- cent transportation sales tax in Maricopa County expires. The ALCP requires that each roadway improvement project include a 30% local match. On November 6, 2018, Scottsdale voters approved Question 1, which was a 0.1% temporary (10-year) transportation privilege (sales) and use tax (0.1% Transportation Tax) increase. With this approval, the city can now match all remaining ALCP funds available to Scottsdale. During the first half of 2019, staff worked with MAG to reprogram the timing and funding amounts (based on more current cost estimates) for individual projects as part of the annual ALCP Update. The FY 2019/20 ALCP Update was formally approved by MAG's Regional Council on June 26, 2019. The FY 2019/20 budget was adopted June 11, 2019, by Ordinance No. 4400. Section 2 of Ordinance No. 4400 allows expenditures to be made from budget contingencies and reserves upon recommendation of the City Manager and approval of the City Council. Additionally, Article 6, Section 11 of the Scottsdale City Charter allows the transfer of any unencumbered appropriation balance or portion thereof between general classifications of expenditures within an office, department, or agency or from one office, department, or agency to another with the approval of City Council.
    [Show full text]
  • Perlstein Abandonment 9-AB-2016
    /tern 9 CnYMUNGIl REPORT Meeting Date: June 11, 2019 General Plan Element: Land Use General Plan Goal: Coordinate Planning to Balance Infrastructure ACTION Perlstein Abandonment 9-AB-2016 Request to consider the following: 1. Adopt Resolution No. 10621 to abandon 25-foot Roadway Easement along the northern boundary of a property located at 8845 E. Sierra Pinta Drive (Parcel Number 217-12-019), with Single-family Residential, Environmentally Sensitive Lands (Rl-35 ESL) zoning. Key Items for Consideration • Access to the property is not impacted or changed by the proposed abandonment • The proposed abandonment conforms with the Transportation Master Plan- which does not require any further right-of-way dedications along E. Sierra Pinta Dr. • Six of twelve lots along E. Sierra Pinta Dr. have abandoned the same Roadway Easement • All Utility Companies were notified of the request, and a Public Utility Easement will be reserved • Public input and questions were received, but with no issue on the proposed abandonment area • Planning Commission heard this case on October 19, 2016 and recommended approval with a 7- 0 vote OWNER Edward Perlstein 480-205-8429 -E.-Siena-Pinta-Drive ■ SliliE APPLICANT CONTACT ^Ekehin^Dnve=£ Edward Perlstein <3 480-205-8429 General Location Map^^ LOCATION 8845 E Sierra Pinta Drive Action Taken City Council Report | Perlstein Abandonment BACKGROUND & EXISTING CONDITIONS Scottsdale General Plan 2001 and Character Area Plan The General Plan Land Use Element currently designates the property as Rural Neighborhoods as a part of the Future Character Area Plan. These categories include relatively low-density and larger lot development, including horse privilege neighborhoods and areas with sensitive and unique natural environments.
    [Show full text]
  • Evaluation of Scottsdale 101 Photo Enforcement Demonstration Program
    Evaluation of the City of Scottsdale Loop 101 Photo Enforcement Demonstration Program Draft Summary Report Prepared by: Simon Washington, Ph.D. Kangwon Shin Ida Van Shalkwyk Arizona State University Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering Tempe, AZ January 11th, 2007 Prepared for: The Arizona Department of Transportation 206 South 17th Avenue Phoenix, Arizona 85007 in cooperation with U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration Page 1 of 92 Draft Summary Report January 11, 2007 Arizona State University Table of Contents Executive Summary................................................................................................................8 Introduction ..........................................................................................................................14 1.1 Background and Objectives........................................................................................14 1.2 Description of the Demonstration Program................................................................ 15 Chapter 2 Literature Review.................................................................................................17 2.1 Studies for Speed Enforcement Cameras on Freeways..............................................17 2.2 Studies for Speed Enforcement Cameras on non-Freeways.......................................18 2.3 Summary of Findings ................................................................................................. 20 Chapter 3 Effects of the SEP on Speeding Behavior and
    [Show full text]