7 a RESOLUTION Accepting and Adopting the Skagit County Solid
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
• • RESOLUTION NO. b~ 7 A RESOLUTION accepting and adopting the Skagit County Solid Waste Management Plan 1981 Update. WHEREAS, R.C.W. 70.94 requires that each county within the state, in cooperation with the various cities located within such county, prepare a coordinated, comprehensive solid waste management plan; and WHEREAS, a Citizens Solid Waste Advisory Committee was formed to assist in the preparation of such a plan; and WHEREAS, a 1981 Solid Waste Management Plan has been developed and the approval of this Plan is in the best interests of the City of Anacortes; now, therefore, IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANACORTES, WASHINGTON, that that certain document entitled "Skagit County Solid Waste Management Plan 1981 Update", a copy of which is attached hereto and by this reference made a part hereof, be and it is in all respects ratified and approved. DATED this 3rd day of August, 1981. CITY OF ANACORTES, (CORPORATE SEAL) • • S K A G I T C 0 U N T Y S 0 L I D W A S T E M A N A G E M E N T P L A N 1 9 8 1 U P D A T E SKAGIT COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS Howard Miller, Chairman Bud Norris Jerry L. Mansfield SKAGIT COUNTY DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS W. Eugene Sampley, P.E. PROJECT DIRECTOR Alan S. Dutcher, P.E. -- ..,, .,. •' PROPOSED TABLE OF CONTENTS • SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT PLAN 1981 • • I. Introduction II. Planning Area Characteristics A. General B. Social and Employment Characteristics C. Population III. Existing Solid Waste Management Conditions and Practices A. Storage B. Collection c. Transportation D. Disposal E. Recycling F. Financing G. Existing Solid Waste Management IV. Solid Waste Quantities and Types A. Household B. Commercial and Institutional e c. Industrial o. Wastewater Treatment E. Agricultural F. Hazardous Wastes G. Solid Waste Trends v. Summary of Solid Waste Problems and Needs A. Storage B. Collection c. Transportation D. Compactor Boxes E. Landfills F. Sludge Disposal G. Resource Recovery H. Administrative and Technical Needs 1. Legislative Needs J. Financial Needs K. Future Constraints L. Long-Range Needs - 20 Years .., ,. Page 2 • VI. Solid Waste Management Alternatives • A. Storage System Alternatives B. Collection Alternatives C. Transportation Alternatives D. Disposal Alternatives: 1. Septic Tank Sludge 2. Municipal Waste E. Financing VII. Recommended Solid Waste Management System A. Selection Criteria B. Recommended Collection and Transportation C. Recomnended Disposal D. Recommended Management E. Recommended Financing VIII. Implementation Plan A. Administrative Task B. Physical Requirements C. Construction and Capita 1 Acquisition. D. Environmental Impacts E. 20 Year Implementation Schedule F. Stat~ Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) G. Interlocal Cooperation Agreement .. • • .e CITIZENS' SOLID WASTE ADVISORY COMMITTEE 1. Burlington: Mrs. Clyde Duffield 755-9446 2. Anacortes: Mr. Al Henke, 293-3760 Retired Shell Co. staff 3. Mt. Vernon:. Mr. Jack Kruger 424-0532 4. Sedro Woolley: Mr. Harvey Nichols 856-0360 5. Skagit County: Mr. Tim Seese, 336-5977 Recycler 6. Skagit County: Mr. Jack Holt, 424-3515 Recycler 7. Skagit County: Mr. Mark Backlund, 293-4283 or 336-3193 Bid conversion 8. Skagit County: Ms. Helen Vandeman, 755-9521 Skagit Farmer's Energy Resource 9. Collection: Mr. Lyle Robbins, 422-5212 Rural Sanitation 10. Farming: Mr. Lyle Ovenell, 466-3138 Chem Track Response Team 11. Forest Products: Mr. Sanvig, 293-2101 Publisher's Products 12. Heavy Indus try: Mr. Dick Flickenger, 293-3111 Shell Oil Company 13. Washington State Parks Ralph Mast 675-2417 Park Manager 5175 N. State Highway 20 Oak Harbor, WA 98277 • 12/80 TECHNICAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE l. Anacortes; Mr. Mike Foster 293-5171 2. Burlington: Mr. Jack Chrysler 755-0531 3. Mt .. Vernon: Mr. Don Semrau, PrE. 336-6585 4. Sedro Woolley: Mr. Tom Oakes 855-1661 5. Skagit County: Mr. Gene Sampley, P.E. 336-9400 6. Industrial Engineer: Mr. Glen Hallman, 336-5705 Northwest Air Pollution 7. Utility Engineer: Mr. Cory Knutsen, 453-6845 Puget Power Bellevue 8. Industrial Engineer: Dick Flickenger, 293-3111 Shell Oil Company (e . • • CHAPTER I INTRODUCTION ..... ·. -- .. • CHAPTER I • IIHRODUCTION The Washington State Legislature, under RCW section 70.95, requires that "each county within the State, fn cooperation with the various cities located within such county, shall prepare a coordinated, comprehensive solid waste management plan." With this direction, the Skagit County Planning Department under the direction of the former Planning Department Director Lou St. John and with the technical assistance from the previous Skagit County Engineer Lloyd Johnson, PE, developed the original Skagit Regional Solid Waste Management Plan. This plan was developed for the Skagit Regional Planning Council members: Anacortes Port of Anacortes Burlington Port of Skagit County La Conner Public Utility District #1 Mt. Vernon Skagit County Sedro Woo 11 ey In the month of July 1973, cities of Anacortes, Burlington, Mt. Vernon, Anacortes and the towns of Concrete, La Conner, Lyman, Hamilton anci the county of Skagit approved the Skagit Regional Solid Waste Management Plan as a part of the 1973 plan update and Department of Ecology grant application of works .e to be implemented. The Solid Waste Management Plan was divided into six (6) phases •. Phase I was the continued operation of "the existing and ongoing solid waste disposal process." Phase II goals were to: "(1) upgrade the disposal operation activities, and (2) to ,reduce the number of solid waste disposal sites which are operating as dumps." The following open dumps were closed and reclaimed: (See map , page Clear Lake Lake Cavanaugh Conway Rockport Marblemount Day Creek Pinelli Each ~f these open dumps were replaced by coin operated drop boxes, except at Day Creek. Subse quently in 1979, the Rockport compactor box was discontinued due to lack of use. Phase III required Alger landfill to be converted to a transfer station. However, a compactor box station was established there. Upon completion of Phase Ill, sanitary landfills were to be established . at:. (a) Inman {c) Upriver (Sauk) {b) Gibralter {d) Sedro Woolley 1 Inman and Gibralter were• established as sanitary landfills and the upriver landfill was sited at Sauk . along Highway 20. The Sedro Woolley landfill was never established since the refuse was easily trucked to the Inman landfill site. Phase IV placed emphasis on the reduction of the number of disposal sites and on volume reduction through "such devices as harrmer mill, compactor, incinerator, baler and etc." Inman pit was to continue as the main disposal site while Gibralter pit was to be filled by 1978 or 1979. Phase V was "oriented around one sanitary landfill operated at a multi-county level and the reduction of landfill sites within those counties. Only Whatcom County is mentioned as a participating county. Phase VI was an ultimate goal of developing recycling capabilities. · In the 1981 update of the Solid.Waste Management Plan, the intent is to review the existing solid waste management conditions and practices and inventory the solid waste quantities and types. With this basic accounting and with a surrmary of the solid waste problems, various management alternatives can be developed for the improvement of the system. Final recorrrnendations for a solid waste management system will be based on the county's eight (8) years of growth as a solid waste manager, the social and legislative changes that have taken place, and most importantly, the technical improvements that have been made during these eight (8) years. 2 • CHAPTER II PHYSICAL CHARACTERISTICS OF SKAGIT COUNTY General Social. Employment. Population. 3 _, CHAPTER II • .. PHYSICAL CHARACTERISTICS OF SKAGIT COUNTY GENERAL Skagit County is located on the northeastern side of Puget Sound within the following described area: Commencing at midchannel of Rosario Strait where the dividing line between Townships_-36 and 37 intersects the same; thence East on said Township line to the summit of the Cascade Mountains; thence South along the summit of said mountain range to the eighth standard parallel; thence West along the parallel to the center of the channel or deepest channel of the nearest arm of Puget Sound and extending along said channel to the East entrance of Deception Pass; thence through said pass to the center of the channel of Rosario Strait; thence Northerly along said channel to place of beginning. ·Geologically, Skagit County lies within the topographic provinces known as the Puget Sound Trough and the Cascade Mountains. Most of the.lowland area is within the Puget Sound Trough, and consists of an extensive delta flood plain, alluvial flats, glacial outwash plain, and a few lateral or frontal. moraines. The elevation of the lowlands ranges from sea level to about 400 feet, except for a number of monadnocks rising higher. The mountains consist of ancient folded sediments, generally metamorphosed, with igneous intrusions. The summit elevation attained is six thousand to eight thousand feet, with peaks extending above these levels. E'xtreme ruggedness is characteristic of the higher ridges due to glaciation. Above elevation five thousand feet alpine glaciers abound. A detailed soil survey was conducted by the U.S. Department of Agriculture, and the findings published in 1960. The soils of the county may be divided into two (2) primary groups, the alluvial soils and the upland soils. Most of the alluvial soils are quite fertile and produce good crops, whereas the upland soils are considerably less productive. Alluvial soils occur in the Skagit River Valley and Delta, and are quite variable. Many of these soils are poorly drained due to lack of relief or impervious underlying strata. Artificial drainage is generally required to maintain productivity. Upland soils tend to be shallow. Some series are underlain by cemented hardpans, and others by porous gravelly materials._ None of these are well suited to agriculture, but fo'rests generally thrive on these soils.