Florida Law Review Volume 69 Article 2 Issue 2 Volume 69, Issue 2 (2017) March 2017 Governance of Steel and Kryptonite Politics in Contemporary Public Education Reform James Liebman Elizabeth Cruikshank Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.law.ufl.edu/flr Part of the Education Law Commons Recommended Citation James Liebman and Elizabeth Cruikshank, Governance of Steel and Kryptonite Politics in Contemporary Public Education Reform, 69 Fla. L. Rev. 365 (2017). Available at: https://scholarship.law.ufl.edu/flr/vol69/iss2/2 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by UF Law Scholarship Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Florida Law Review by an authorized editor of UF Law Scholarship Repository. For more information, please contact
[email protected]. Liebman and Cruikshank: Governance of Steel and Kryptonite Politics in Contemporary Publi GOVERNANCE OF STEEL AND KRYPTONITE POLITICS IN CONTEMPORARY PUBLIC EDUCATION REFORM James S. Liebman*, Elizabeth Cruikshank**, Christina Ma*** Abstract Entrenched bureaucracies and special-interest politics hamper public education in the United States. In response, school districts and states have recently adopted or promoted reforms designed to release schools from bureaucratic control and empower them to meet strengthened outcome standards. Despite promising results, the reforms have been widely criticized, including by the educationally disadvantaged families they most appear to help. To explain this paradox, this Article first considers the governance alternatives to bureaucracy that the education reforms adopt. It concludes that the reforms do not adopt the most commonly cited alternatives to bureaucracy—marketization, managerialism, or professionalism/craft— and that none of those models effectively frees public education of special-interest politics.