DOCSLIB.ORG

Advisory Committee on Bankruptcy Rules

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Advisory Committee on Bankruptcy Rules ADVISORY COMMITTEE ON BANKRUPTCY RULES April 2-3, 2020 THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY BLANK ADVISORY COMMITTEE ON BANKRUPTCY RULES April 3-4, 2020 Discussion Agenda 1. Greetings and introductions (Judge Dow). Tab 1 Committee Roster Subcommittee Liaisons Chart Tracking Proposed Rules Amendments Pending Legislation Chart 2. Approval of minutes of the September 26, 2019 meeting in Washington, DC (Judge Dow). Tab 2 Draft minutes 3. Oral reports on meeting of other committees: A. Standing Committee – January 28, 2020 (Judge Dow, Professors Gibson and Bartell). Tab 3A1 Draft minutes of the Standing Committee meeting Tab 3A2 March 2020 Report of the Standing Committee to the Judicial Conference B. Advisory Committee on Appellate Rules – April 4, 2020 (Judge Donald). C. Advisory Committee on Civil Rules – April 1, 2020 (Judge Goldgar). D. Bankruptcy Committee – December 10-11, 2019 (Judge Bernstein, Judge Isicoff). 4. Report of the Privacy, Public Access and Appeals Subcommittee (Judge Ambro). A. Report on possible amendments to conform Bankruptcy Rule 8003 to proposed changes to Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure 3 (Professor Gibson). Tab 4A March 3, 2020 memo by Professor Gibson 5. Report of the Business Subcommittee (Judge Bernstein). A. Recommended amendments to Rule 5005 concerning notices sent to the United States trustee (Professor Bartell). Tab 5A March 6, 2020 memo by Professor Bartell Advisory Committee on Bankruptcy Rules | April 2-3, 2020 Page 3 of 360 B. Recommendation to publish a new subdivision (i) to Rule 7004 addressing Suggestions 19-BK-D and 19-BK-J (Professor Bartell). Tab 5B March 6, 2020 memo by Professor Bartell C. Recommendation to republish for comment SBRA Rules 1007, 1020, 2009, 2012, 2015, 3010, 3011, 3014, 3016, 3017.1, 3017.2 (new), 3018 and 3019 (Professor Gibson). Tab 5C March 2, 2020 memo by Professor Gibson D. Consideration of comments on published Rules 3007 and 7007.1 (Professor Gibson). Tab 5D March 2, 2020 memo on Rules 3007 and 7007.1 by Professor Gibson E. Consideration of comments on published Rule 9036 (Professor Gibson). Tab 5E March 3, 2020 memo on Rule 9036 by Professor Gibson 6. Report of the Consumer Subcommittee (Judge Goldgar). A. Consideration of comments on Rule 2005 (Professor Bartell). Tab 6A March 6, 2020 memo by Professor Bartell B. Consideration of suggestions 18-BK-G and 18-BK-H for amendments to Rule 3002.1 (Professor Gibson). Tab 6B March 3, 2020 memo by Professor Gibson C. Recommendation to publish amendment to Rule 3002(c)(6) in consideration of suggestion 19-BK-F. Tab 6C March 9, 2020 memo by Professor Bartell 7. Report of the Forms Subcommittee (Judge Hoffman). A. Recommendation to publish for comment SBRA Forms 101, 122B, 201, 309E1, 309E2, 309F1, 309F2, 314, 315, 425A (Professor Gibson). Tab 7A March 2, 2020 memo by Professor Gibson Tab 7A1 Official Form 122B 2 Advisory Committee on Bankruptcy Rules | April 2-3, 2020 Page 4 of 360 Tab 7A2 Official Form 122B Committee Note B. Consideration of conforming amendments to official form 417A (notice of appeal and statement of election) (Professor Gibson). Tab 7B March 3, 2020 memo by Professor Gibson C. Discharge orders for subchapter v cases. (Professor Gibson). Tab 7C March 2, 2020 memo by Professor Gibson Tab 7C1 Form 3180RV1 Tab 7C2 Form 3180RV2 Tab 7C3 Form 3180RV3 8. Report of the Restyling Subcommittee (Judge Krieger; Professor Bartell). Tab 8A March 6, 2020 memo by Professor Bartell Restyled Rules 1001-2020 Tab 8A1 1000 Series Rules Tab 8A2 2000 Series Rules 9. Future meetings: The fall meeting will be held September 22, 2020 in Washington, D.C. 10. New Business. 11. Adjourn. Proposed Consent Agenda The Chair and Reporters have proposed the following items for study and consideration prior to the Advisory Committee=s meeting. Absent any objection, all recommendations will be approved by acclamation at the meeting. Any of these matters may be moved to the Discussion Agenda if a member or liaison feels that discussion or debate is required prior to Committee action. Requests to move an item to the Discussion Agenda must be brought to attention of the Chair by noon, Eastern Time, on Thursday, March 26, 2020. 1. Consumer Subcommittee. A. Recommendation of no action concerning suggestions 19-BK-I and 19-BK-K for rule amendments to address DSO certification for deceased debtors Consent Tab 1A March 6, 2020 memo by Professor Bartell 3 Advisory Committee on Bankruptcy Rules | April 2-3, 2020 Page 5 of 360 THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY BLANK Page 6 of 360 TAB 1 Page 7 of 360 THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY BLANK Page 8 of 360 ADVISORY COMMITTEE ON BANKRUPTCY RULES Chair Reporter Honorable Dennis Dow Professor S. Elizabeth Gibson United States Bankruptcy Court University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Charles Evans Whittaker U.S. Courthouse 5073 Van Hecke-Wettach Hall, C.B. #3380 400 East Ninth Street, Room 6562 Chapel Hill, NC 27599-3380 Kansas City, MO 64106 Associate Reporter Professor Laura B. Bartell Wayne State University Law School 471 W. Palmer Detroit, MI 48202 Members Honorable Thomas L. Ambro Honorable Stuart M. Bernstein United States Court of Appeals United States Bankruptcy Court J. Caleb Boggs Federal Building Alexander Hamilton Custom House 844 North King Street, Unit 32 One Bowling Green, Room 729 Wilmington, DE 19801-3519 New York, NY 10004-1408 Honorable Bernice B. Donald Honorable A. Benjamin Goldgar United States Court of Appeals United States Bankruptcy Court Clifford Davis and Odell Horton Building Everett McKinley Dirksen U.S. Courthouse 167 North Main Street, Room 1132 219 South Dearborn Street, Room 638 Memphis, TN 38103 Chicago, IL 60604 Jeffery J. Hartley, Esq. Honorable Melvin S. Hoffman Helmsing Leach United States Bankruptcy Court Post Office Box 2767 John W. McCormack Post Office Mobile, AL 36652 and Courthouse 5 Post Office Square, Room 1150 Boston, MA 02109-3945 Effective: October 1, 2019 to September 30, 2020 Page 1 Revised: February 27, 2020 Page 9 of 360 ADVISORY COMMITTEE ON BANKRUPTCY RULES Members (continued) Honorable David A. Hubbert Honorable Marcia S. Krieger Acting Assistant Attorney General, Tax United States District Court Division (ex officio) Alfred A. Arraj U.S. Courthouse United States Department of Justice 901 19th Street, Room A941 950 Pennsylvania Ave. N.W., Room 4141 Denver, CO 80294 Washington, DC 20530 Thomas M. Mayer, Esq. Debra L. Miller, Esq. Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP Chapter 13 Bankruptcy Trustee 1177 Avenue of the Americas P. O. Box 11550 New York, NY 10036 South Bend, IN 46634 Honorable J. Paul Oetken Jeremy L. Retherford, Esq. United States District Court Balch & Bingham LLP Thurgood Marshall U.S. Courthouse 1901 Sixth Avenue North, Suite 1500 40 Centre Street, Room 2101 Birmingham, AL 35203-4642 New York, NY 10007-1501 Professor David A. Skeel Honorable George H. Wu University of Pennsylvania Law School United States District Court 3501 Sansom Street 350 West 1st Street STE 4311, Room 9151 Philadelphia, PA 19104 Los Angeles, CA 90012-4565 Liaisons Ramona D. Elliott, Esq. Honorable Laurel M. Isicoff (U.S. Trustees) (Committee on the Administration of the Deputy Director/General Counsel Bankruptcy System) Executive Office for U.S. Trustees United States Bankruptcy Court 20 Massachusetts Ave., N.W., Suite 8100 C. Clyde Atkins United States Courthouse Washington, DC 20530 301 North Miami Avenue, Room 817 Miami, FL 33128 Honorable William J. Kayatta, Jr. (Standing) United States Court of Appeals Edward T. Gignoux Federal Courthouse 156 Federal Street, Suite 6740 Portland, ME 04101-4152 Effective: October 1, 2019 to September 30, 2020 Page 2 Revised: February 27, 2020 Page 10 of 360 ADVISORY COMMITTEE ON BANKRUPTCY RULES Clerk of Court Representative Kenneth S. Gardner Clerk United States Bankruptcy Court 721 19th Street, Room 116 Denver, CO 80202-2508 Secretary, Standing Committee and Rules Committee Chief Counsel Rebecca A. Womeldorf Administrative Office of the U.S. Courts One Columbus Circle, N.E., Room 7-300 Washington, DC 20544 Effective: October 1, 2019 to September 30, 2020 Page 3 Revised: February 27, 2020 Page 11 of 360 THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY BLANK Page 12 of 360 Advisory Committee on Bankruptcy Rules Members Position District/Circuit Start Date End Date Dennis Dow Member: 2014 ---- Chair B Missouri (Western) Chair: 2018 2021 Thomas L. Ambro C Third Circuit 2016 2022 Stuart M. Bernstein B New York (Southern) 2014 2020 Bernice B. Donald C Sixth Circuit 2019 2022 A. Benjamin Goldgar B Illinois (Northern) 2014 2020 Jeffery J. Hartley ESQ Alabama 2014 2020 Melvin S. Hoffman B Massachusetts 2016 2022 David A. Hubbert* DOJ Washington, DC ---- Open Marcia S. Krieger D Colorado 2017 2020 Thomas M. Mayer ESQ New York 2014 2020 Debra Miller ESQ Indiana 2017 2020 J. Paul Oetken D New York (Southern) 2019 2022 Jeremy L. Retherford ESQ Alabama 2018 2021 David A. Skeel ACAD Pennsylvania 2016 2022 George H. Wu D California (Central) 2018 2021 S. Elizabeth Gibson Reporter ACAD North Carolina 2008 Open Laura B. Bartell Associate Reporter ACAD Michigan 2017 2022 Principal Staff: Rebecca Womeldorf 202-502-1820 S. Scott Myers 202-502-1820 __________ * Ex-officio - Deputy Assistant Attorney General, Tax Division Page 13 of 360 THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY BLANK Page 14 of 360 RULES COMMITTEE LIAISON MEMBERS Liaisons for the Advisory Committee on Hon. Frank M. Hull Appellate Rules (Standing) Hon. Bernice B. Donald (Bankruptcy) Liaison for the Advisory Committee on Hon. William J. Kayatta, Jr. Bankruptcy Rules (Standing) Liaisons for the Advisory Committee on Peter D. Keisler, Esq. Civil Rules (Standing) Hon. A. Benjamin Goldgar (Bankruptcy) Liaison for the Advisory Committee on Hon. Jesse M. Furman Criminal Rules (Standing) Liaisons for the Advisory Committee on Hon. James C. Dever III Evidence Rules (Criminal) Hon. Carolyn B. Kuhl (Standing) Hon. Sara Lioi (Civil) Effective: October 1, 2019 to September 30, 2020 Page 1 Revised: February 27, 2020 Page 15 of 360 THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY BLANK Page 16 of 360 ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES COURTS Staff Rebecca A.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • List of Judges 1985–2017 Notre Dame Law School
    Notre Dame Law School NDLScholarship Annual Moot Court Showcase Argument Conferences, Events and Lectures 2017 List of Judges 1985–2017 Notre Dame Law School Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarship.law.nd.edu/ndls_moot_court Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation Notre Dame Law School, "List of Judges 1985–2017" (2017). Annual Moot Court Showcase Argument. 1. http://scholarship.law.nd.edu/ndls_moot_court/1 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Conferences, Events and Lectures at NDLScholarship. It has been accepted for inclusion in Annual Moot Court Showcase Argument by an authorized administrator of NDLScholarship. For more information, please contact [email protected]. List of Judges that Have Served the Moot Court Showcase Argument 2009 to present held in McCarten Court Room, Eck Hall of Law Updated: March 2017 Name Yr. Served ND Grad Court Judge Alice Batchelder 3/3/2017 U.S. Court of Appeals for the 6th Circuit Chief Justice Matthew Durrant 3/3/2017 Utah Supreme Court NDLS 1992 Judge John Blakey 3/3/2017 BA-UND 1988 U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois Chief Justice Matthew G. Durrant 2/25/2106 Utah Supreme Court Judge Alice Batchelder 2/25/2016 U.S. Court of Appeals for the 6th Circuit Chief Magistrate Judge Maureen Kelly 2/25/2016 BA-UND 1983 U.S. District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania Judge Joel F. Dubina 2/26/2015 U.S. Court of Appeals for the 11th Circuit Chief Judge Frederico A. Moreno 2/26/2015 United States District Court - Miami, FL Judge Patricia O'Brien Cotter 2/26/2015 NDLS 1977 Montana Supreme Court Judge Margaret A.
    [Show full text]
  • Trump Judges: Even More Extreme Than Reagan and Bush Judges
    Trump Judges: Even More Extreme Than Reagan and Bush Judges September 3, 2020 Executive Summary In June, President Donald Trump pledged to release a new short list of potential Supreme Court nominees by September 1, 2020, for his consideration should he be reelected in November. While Trump has not yet released such a list, it likely would include several people he has already picked for powerful lifetime seats on the federal courts of appeals. Trump appointees' records raise alarms about the extremism they would bring to the highest court in the United States – and the people he would put on the appellate bench if he is reelected to a second term. According to People For the American Way’s ongoing research, these judges (including those likely to be on Trump’s short list), have written or joined more than 100 opinions or dissents as of August 31 that are so far to the right that in nearly one out of every four cases we have reviewed, other Republican-appointed judges, including those on Trump’s previous Supreme Court short lists, have disagreed with them.1 Considering that every Republican president since Ronald Reagan has made a considerable effort to pick very conservative judges, the likelihood that Trump could elevate even more of his extreme judicial picks raises serious concerns. On issues including reproductive rights, voting rights, police violence, gun safety, consumer rights against corporations, and the environment, Trump judges have consistently sided with right-wing special interests over the American people – even measured against other Republican-appointed judges. Many of these cases concern majority rulings issued or joined by Trump judges.
    [Show full text]
  • The Career Connection
    INSIDE THIS ISSUE ● MAY 16, 2016 Career Planning Events Calendar…………………………………………………….2 Akron Bar Association Events Calendar......………...……………………................2 News Flash……………………………………………...……………………................2 The University of Akron School of Law Job Announcements………………………………….………………………..............7 Career Planning & Placement Office Attorney Positions………………………………….………………………...……7 General Office Hours: Jobs Received from Various Legal Recruiting Firms……………………....…14 Judicial Clerkships…..………………………….………………………….……..16 Monday: 8:00 a.m. – 5:00 p.m. Tuesday: 8:00 a.m. – 6:30 p.m. Other Positions….……………………………………..…………………….……31 Wednesday: 8:00 a.m. – 5:00 p.m. Articles and Items of Interest………………………..………………………………..35 Thursday: 8:00 a.m. – 6:30 p.m. Friday: 8:00 a.m. – 5:00 p.m. Useful Links….……..…………………………………...……………………..............35 If you would like to schedule an appointment, please call 330-972-5321 or e-mail [email protected] Office Staff: Alisa N. Benedict O’Brien, Esq. Director Career Planning & Placement MAJOR ANNOUNCEMENTS Debbie Casey Student Services Counselor The Career Planning Office is now located in the Law Library on the second floor in room 264. Come see us! Angela S. Smith Coordinator, Office Administration On The Web: www.uakron.edu/law/career www.twitter.com/AkronLawCareers Our Summer Hours are Monday – Friday, 8:00 AM – 4:30 PM Career Planning Events Calendar: Stay Tuned for our Fall 2016 Programs! You may access all previous career planning workshops at http://www.uakron.edu/law/career/students/videos.dot Akron Bar Association Events Calendar: Note: most events require an RSVP to the Bar Association. A full calendar of Akron Bar events is located at: http://www.akronbar.org/calendar.aspx. Upcoming Section and Committee Meetings: The CPPO encourages Akron Law students to attend Akron Bar events and CLE.
    [Show full text]
  • Measures Highlight Campaign Plan
    On the ballot Why should you care whether the U.S. Senate confirms a Measures highlight campaign plan Supreme Court nominee now? There are two very important ini- osition 227 of 1998 and would pro- sembly and Senate, Congress and It may seem like little more than tiatives on the November ballot, the vide services for ALL students in the Presidential campaigns. The CTA noise out of Washington, D.C. , but Children’s Education and Health state of California that would put Board approved a Campaign Plan at the current battle to get the U.S. Sen- Care Protection Act (CEHCP), which them on the path to becoming bilin- their May 17 meeting. Information ate to do its job by considering a new is the extension of the Prop 30 tax on gual. on the Campaign Plan will be shared high court nominee has important im- high wage earners, and the Education CTA members will be asked to at State Council, Service Center plications for every student, every ed- for a Global Economy (EdGE), work in support of these initiatives as Councils and in local rep meetings. ucator, every school, and every union which would repeal and amend prop- well as targeted races in the State As- member in our nation. In the years ahead, the U.S. Su- preme Court may rule on issues in- cluding the rights of teachers to due Field work surprises process and a fair hearing when charges are leveled. It could rule on CSO staff Ed Sibby got a welcome surprise when covering an the rights of schools to be fully fund- Alliance To Reclaim Our Schools walk-in event in Lake Elsinore ed in order to provide a high quality in early May.
    [Show full text]
  • Hon. Diana Murphy United States Circuit Judge Minneapolis, Minnesota United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
    THE PANEL No: 18-1299 In re: Terry Lee Hinds, Petitioner *** Hon. Diana Murphy United States Circuit Judge Minneapolis, Minnesota United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit Bachelor's University of Minnesota, B.A., 1954 Law University of Minnesota Law School, J.D., 1974 Diana E. Murphy is a federal judge on senior status with the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit. She was nominated by President Bill Clinton in 1994 to the Eighth Circuit. Murphy was first nominated to the federal bench in 1979 by Jimmy Carter to serve with the United States District Court for the District of Minnesota. Early life and education Born in Faribault, Minnesota, Murphy earned her B.A. from the University of Minnesota in 1954 and her J.D. from the University of Minnesota Law School in 1974. [1] Professional career • 1994-present: United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit • 2016-present: Senior judge • 1994-2016: Judge • 1999-2004: Chair, U.S. Sentencing Commission • 1979-1994: Judge, United States District Court for the District of Minnesota • 1978-1980: Judge, Fourth Judicial District of Minnesota • 1976-1978: Judge, Hennepin County municipal court • 1974-1976: Private practice, Minneapolis, Minn. Hon. Roger L. Wollman United States Circuit Judge Sioux Falls, South Dakota United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit Bachelor's Tabor College, B.A., 1957 Graduate Harvard Law School, L.L.M., 1964 Law University of South Dakota School of Law, J.D., 1962 Roger Leland Wollman is a federal judge on the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit.
    [Show full text]
  • The Current Status of D.R. Horton, Pending Appellate Litigation, and Predictions of Supreme Court Review
    Hofstra Labor & Employment Law Journal Volume 34 | Issue 1 Article 5 9-1-2016 The urC rent Status of D.R. Horton, Pending Appellate Litigation, and Predictions of Supreme Court Review Irene A. Zoupaniotis Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarlycommons.law.hofstra.edu/hlelj Part of the Labor and Employment Law Commons Recommended Citation Zoupaniotis, Irene A. (2016) "The urC rent Status of D.R. Horton, Pending Appellate Litigation, and Predictions of Supreme Court Review," Hofstra Labor & Employment Law Journal: Vol. 34 : Iss. 1 , Article 5. Available at: http://scholarlycommons.law.hofstra.edu/hlelj/vol34/iss1/5 This document is brought to you for free and open access by Scholarly Commons at Hofstra Law. It has been accepted for inclusion in Hofstra Labor & Employment Law Journal by an authorized administrator of Scholarly Commons at Hofstra Law. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Zoupaniotis: The Current Status of D.R. Horton, Pending Appellate Litigation, THE CURRENT STATUS OF D.R. HORTON, PENDING APPELLATE LITIGATION, AND PREDICTIONS OF SUPREME COURT REVIEW Irene A. Zoupaniotis* I. INTRODUCTION Enforcement of arbitration agreements and class-action waivers has been consistently upheld by the Supreme Court's construction and interpretation of the Federal Arbitration Act ("FAA"). Indeed, the Court has generally found that resolution of claims as a class is a procedural, not substantive, right and that as such, class action waivers are enforceable under the FAA. Unlike the cases that have been decided by the Supreme Court to date, the National Labor Relations Act ("NLRA") protects employees' right to act in concert for the protection of their interests.
    [Show full text]
  • Bench Briefs in This Issue……
    ASSOCIATION OF THE BAR OF THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT VOL.1, ISSUE 4 NOVEMBER 2003 Bench Briefs In this issue…… New Eighth Circuit Judge Steven Colloton will be sitting with the Court for the first time November 20 and 21, 2003, in St. Louis. The Senate confirmed Bench Briefs Colloton’s nomination in early September, and Judge Colloton took his oath privately Colloton Official around the end of the month. New Nominee McMillian Ceremony Judge Colloton will maintain his chambers in Des Moines, where a public Judges Speak investiture ceremony is scheduled for December 5, 2003. Judge Colloton is reported R. Arnold on Web to be the youngest current U.S. Court of Appeals judge. F. Gibson Tribute For biographical information on Judge Colloton, visit www.usdoj.gov/usao/ias/smcolloton.htm. Time/Place/Manner * * * * * * Fee Increase Panels ‘On the Road’ Fillable Forms President George W. Bush on September 29, 2003, nominated Raymond W. Rules Approved Gruender, who currently is U.S. Attorney for the Eastern District of Missouri, to one Multidistrict Case of the two open seats on the Eighth Circuit. The Senate Judiciary Committee has not yet set a hearing on the nomination. Association News Gruender, a 1987 graduate of the Washington University School of Law, was Omaha Luncheon an assistant United States Attorney in the Eastern District of Missouri from 1990 until Web Link 1994 and a partner at the St. Louis firm of Thompson Coburn from 1994 until his Program Suggestions? appointment as U.S. Attorney in 2000. Nominations? For additional biographical information on Gruender, visit www.usdoj.gov/olp/gruenderresume.htm.
    [Show full text]
  • A Prayer Guide for the Potential Nominees for Supreme Court Keith
    A Prayer Guide for the potential nominees for Supreme Court Praying for all those in authority is a command by the Lord as instruct- ed in 1 Timothy 2:1-2. As new leaders are appointed, we are compelled by Scripture to pray for them. This is the goal of Pray for America’s Leaders. The Supreme Court will make decisions on many critical issues as in past years such as Roe v. Wade and the Obergefell same-sex Keith Blackwell Charles Canady marriage decision. The Keith Blackwell is a Charles Canady is a appointment to the Supreme Court by justice of the Supreme Court justice of the Supreme Trump is paramount to of Georgia. He has served in Court of Florida. He has the preservation of the this position since 2012. He served in this role since U.S. Constitution and our religious freedoms. previously served on the 2008, and served as Please join us in praying Georgia Court of Appeals. Before serving on the the court's Chief Justice from 2010 to 2012. for each nominee who is bench, Justice Blackwell was a Deputy Special Prior to his appointment, Justice Canady being considered. Attorney General of the State of Georgia, an served as a judge of the Florida Second PRAY that all nominees Assistant District Attorney in Cobb County, and District Court of Appeal and as a member of will have humility, know a commercial litigator in private practice. Justice the United States House of Representatives their inadequacies, and seek the will of God Blackwell is a graduate of the University of for four terms.
    [Show full text]
  • Congressional Record United States Th of America PROCEEDINGS and DEBATES of the 109 CONGRESS, SECOND SESSION
    E PL UR UM IB N U U S Congressional Record United States th of America PROCEEDINGS AND DEBATES OF THE 109 CONGRESS, SECOND SESSION Vol. 152 WASHINGTON, FRIDAY, MAY 26, 2006 No. 68 House of Representatives The House was not in session today. Its next meeting will be held on Tuesday, June 6, 2006, at 2 p.m. Senate FRIDAY, MAY 26, 2006 The Senate met at 8:45 a.m. and was EXECUTIVE SESSION This vote will go forward, unlike the called to order by the President pro votes for two far more qualified people tempore (Mr. STEVENS). nominated by President Clinton who NOMINATION OF BRETT M. were pocket-filibustered by the Repub- PRAYER KAVANAUGH TO BE UNITED lican leadership of the Senate, along The Chaplain, Dr. Barry C. Black, of- STATES CIRCUIT JUDGE FOR with 59 other judges nominated by fered the following prayer: THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA President Clinton who were pocket-fili- May we pray. CIRCUIT bustered by the Republican leadership. Eternal, sovereign Lord, supply our The PRESIDENT pro tempore. Under What I worry about with this nomi- needs for today. the previous order, the Senate will pro- nation of Mr. Kavanaugh, whose ABA Give strength to the weak as they ceed to executive session and resume shoulder heavy responsibilities. Give the consideration of Calendar No. 632, rating has been downgraded—it is al- rest to the weary, that their tired which the clerk will report. most unprecedented to see that hap- hands will find new vigor. Give comfort The legislative clerk read the nomi- pen—is that he is a man who in all his to the sorrowful and compensate them nation of Brett M.
    [Show full text]
  • Fire Alarms Or Smoke Detectors: the Role of Interest Groups in Confirmation of United States Courts of Appeals Judges
    FIRE ALARMS OR SMOKE DETECTORS: THE ROLE OF INTEREST GROUPS IN CONFIRMATION OF UNITED STATES COURTS OF APPEALS JUDGES By DONALD E. CAMPBELL A DISSERTATION PRESENTED TO THE GRADUATE SCHOOL OF THE UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA 2016 © 2016 Donald E. Campbell To Ken and JJ ACKNOWLEDGMENTS It took Leo Tolstoy six years to write War and Peace. It has taken me twice that long to complete this dissertation, and I am certain I required much more support throughout the process than Tolstoy. I begin my acknowledgements with Dr. Marcus Hendershot. In short, this dissertation would not have been possible without Marc’s guidance, advice, and prodding. Every aspect of this dissertation has Marc’s imprint on it in some way. I cannot imagine the amount of time that he spent providing comments and suggestions. I will forever be in his debt and gratitude. I also want to thank the other members of my dissertation committee. Dr. Lawrence Dodd, the chair, has been a steadying force in my graduate school life since (literally) the first day I stepped in the door of Anderson Hall. His advice and encouragement will never be forgotten. The other members of my committee–Dr. Beth Rosenson, Dr. David Hedge, and Professor Danaya Wright (University of Florida School of Law)–have been more than understanding as the months dragged into years of getting the dissertation finalized. No one could ask for a better or more understanding dissertation committee. There are also several individuals outside of the University of Florida that I owe acknowledgements.
    [Show full text]
  • Advisory Committee on Appellate Rules
    ADVISORY COMMITTEE ON APPELLATE RULES Denver, CO April 5-6, 2016 UTABLE OF CONTENTS MEETING AGENDA ......................................................................................................................... 7 TAB 1 Table of Agenda Items (April 2016) ........................................................................ 19 TAB 2 Opening Business A. ACTION ITEM: Approval of Minutes Draft Minutes of the Fall 2015 Meeting of the Advisory Committee on Appellate Rules ....................................................................................... 27 B. Information Item: Draft Minutes of the January 2016 Meeting of the Committee on Rules of Practice and Procedure ....................................... 43 TAB 3 ACTION ITEM: For Publication - Item No. 12-AP-D (Civil Rule 62: Bonds and Other Security) A. Reporter’s Memorandum (March 13, 2016) ............................................. 61 B. Additional Materials: Draft Report of the Civil-Appellate Subcommittee (February 25, 2016)...................................................................................... 69 TAB 4 Discussion Item: Item No. 12-AP-F (Civil Rule 23: Class Action Settlement Objectors) A. Reporter’s Memorandum (March 13, 2016) ............................................. 83 B. Additional Materials: Draft Report of the Civil Rule 23 Subcommittee (February 26, 2016)...................................................................................... 89 Memorandum to Judge John D. Bates, Chair of the Advisory Committee on Civil Rules, from Derek Webb,
    [Show full text]
  • The Trump List: Donald Trump’S List of Potential Supreme Court Nominees and What That Means for America
    May 20, 2016 The Trump List: Donald Trump’s List of Potential Supreme Court Nominees and What that Means for America By refusing to even consider the nomination of Chief Judge Merrick Garland—who has received bipartisan praise throughout his long career, and who has more judicial experience than any previous Supreme Court nominee—the Senate Republicans are holding the current vacancy for Donald Trump—a man Republicans have called a ―race-baiting, xenophobic, religious bigot,‖ a ―con artist,‖ ―phony,‖ ―know-nothing candidate,‖ and an ―utterly amoral,‖ ―uninformed,‖ ―nut job.‖ One Republican Senator said that Trump has ―no understanding of the fact that, in the American system, we have a constitutional system of checks and balances.‖ So what kind of justice would President Trump appoint? And what would that mean for the nation‘s most pressing issues? These are important questions not just for the current vacancy, but for an aging Court that could easily have another two or three vacancies in the next president‘s first term. Trump provided some long-promised answers this week when he released the names of 11 potential Supreme Court nominees. Trump said that he would ―use this list as a guide to nominate our next United States Supreme Court justices‖ and that the list is ―representative of the kind of constitutional principles [he] value[s]‖1—though he previously said he would ―guarantee‖ a nomination from the list.2 He later added that the campaign will ―add[ ] some additional‖ names.3 Though Trump did not explain how he arrived at the names, he previously said he sought advice from two conservative groups—The Heritage Foundation and the Federalist Society.4 The list includes six federal court of appeals judges, and five state supreme court justices.
    [Show full text]