Conserved Bacterial Genomes from Two Geographically Distinct Peritidal Stromatolite Formations Shed Light on Potential Functiona
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/818625; this version posted March 14, 2020. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license. 1 Conserved bacterial genomes from two geographically distinct peritidal 2 stromatolite formations shed light on potential functional guilds 3 4 Running Title: Functional bacterial guilds in stromatolites 5 6 Samantha C. Waterwortha, Eric W. Isemongerb, Evan R. Reesa, Rosemary A. 7 Dorringtonb and Jason C. Kwana# 8 a Division of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Wisconsin, 777 Highland Ave., 9 Madison, Wisconsin 53705, USA 10 b Department of Biochemistry and Microbiology, Rhodes University, Grahamstown, 11 South Africa 12 #Corresponding author. Email: [email protected]; Phone: 608-262-3829 13 14 ORIGINALITY-SIGNIFICANCE 15 Peritidal stromatolites are unique among stromatolite formations as they grow at the 16 dynamic interface of calcium carbonate-rich groundwater and coastal marine waters. 17 The peritidal space forms a relatively unstable environment and the factors that 18 influence the growth of these peritidal structures is not well understood. To our 19 knowledge, this is the first comparative study that assesses species conservation within 20 the microbial communities of two geographically distinct peritidal stromatolite 21 formations. We assessed the potential functional roles of these communities using 22 genomic bins clustered from metagenomic sequencing data. We identified several 23 conserved bacterial species across the two sites and hypothesize that their genetic 1 bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/818625; this version posted March 14, 2020. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license. 24 functional potential may be important in the formation of pertidal stromatolites. We 25 contrasted these findings against a well-studied site in Shark Bay, Australia and show 26 that, unlike these hypersaline formations, archaea do not play a major role in peritidal 27 stromatolite formation. Furthermore, bacterial nitrogen and phosphate metabolisms of 28 conserved species may be driving factors behind lithification in peritidal stromatolites. 29 30 SUMMARY 31 Stromatolites are complex microbial mats that form lithified layers and ancient forms are 32 the oldest evidence of life on earth, dating back over 3.4 billion years. Modern 33 stromatolites are relatively rare but may provide clues about the function and evolution 34 of their ancient counterparts. In this study, we focus on peritidal stromatolites occurring 35 at Cape Recife and Schoenmakerskop on the southeastern South African coastline. 36 Using assembled shotgun metagenomic data we obtained 183 genomic bins, of which 37 the most dominant taxa were from the Cyanobacteriia class (Cyanobacteria phylum), 38 with lower but notable abundances of bacteria classified as Alphaproteobacteria, 39 Gammaproteobacteria and Bacteroidia. We identified functional gene sets in bacterial 40 species conserved across two geographically distinct stromatolite formations, which 41 may promote carbonate precipitation through the reduction of nitrogenous compounds 42 and possible production of calcium ions. We propose that an abundance of extracellular 43 alkaline phosphatases may lead to the formation of phosphatic deposits within these 44 stromatolites. We conclude that the cumulative effect of several conserved bacterial 45 species drives accretion in these two stromatolite formations. 46 2 bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/818625; this version posted March 14, 2020. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license. 47 INTRODUCTION 48 Stromatolites are organo-sedimentary structures that date back more than 3.4 billion 49 years, forming the oldest fossils of living organisms on Earth (Dupraz et al., 2009). A 50 more recent discovery of stromatolite-like structures in Greenland suggests that the 51 structures may date as far back as 3.7 - 3.8 billion years (Nutman et al., 2016), 52 however, their biogenic origin remains under debate (Witze, 2016). The emergence of 53 Cyanobacteria in stromatolites approximately 2.3 billion years ago initiated the Great 54 Oxygenation Event that fundamentally altered the Earth’s redox potential and resulted in 55 an explosion of oxygen-based and multicellular biological diversity (Soo et al., 2017). 56 Ancient stromatolites could provide insight into how microorganisms shaped early 57 eukaryotic evolution. Unfortunately ancient microbial mats are not sufficiently preserved 58 for identification of these microbes and individual bacteria cannot be classified more 59 specifically than phylum Cyanobacteria due to morphological conservatism (Awramik, 60 1992; Dupraz et al., 2009). The study of extant stromatolite analogs may therefore help 61 to elucidate the biological mechanisms that led to the formation and evolution of their 62 ancient ancestors. Modern stromatolites are formed through a complex combination of 63 both biotic and abiotic processes. The core process revolves around the carbon cycle 64 where bacteria transform inorganic carbon into bioavailable organic carbon for 65 respiration. Bacterial respiration in turn results in the release of inorganic carbon, which, 66 under alkaline conditions, will bind cations and precipitate primarily as calcium 67 carbonate (Dupraz et al., 2009). This carbonate precipitate, along with sediment grains, 68 can then become trapped within bacterial biofilms forming the characteristic lithified 69 layers. 3 bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/818625; this version posted March 14, 2020. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license. 70 71 Alteration of the pH and subsequently, the solubility index (SI), may promote 72 mineralization or dissolution of carbonate minerals through microbial cycling of redox 73 sensitive compounds such as phosphate, nitrogen, sulfur and other nutrients within the 74 biofilm. This in turn regulates the rate of carbonate accretion and stromatolite growth. 75 Particularly, photosynthesis and sulfate reduction have been demonstrated to increase 76 alkalinity thereby promoting carbonate accretion, resulting in the gradual formation of 77 lithified mineral layers (Dupraz et al., 2009). In some stromatolite formations such as 78 those of Shark Bay, Australia, there is abundant genetic potential for both dissimilatory 79 oxidation of sulfur (which may promote dissolution under oxic conditions and 80 precipitation under anoxic conditions) and dissimilatory reduction of sulfate (which 81 promotes precipitation) (Gallagher et al., 2012; Casaburi et al., 2016; Wong et al., 82 2018). 83 84 The biogenicity of stromatolites has been studied extensively in the hypersaline and 85 marine formations of Shark Bay, Australia and Exuma Cay, Bahamas, respectively 86 (Khodadad and Foster, 2012; Babilonia et al., 2018). The presence of Archaea has 87 been noted in several microbial mat and stromatolite systems (Casaburi et al., 2016; 88 Balci et al., 2018; Medina-Chávez et al., 2019), particularly in the stromatolites of Shark 89 Bay, where they are hypothesized to potentially fulfill the role of nitrifiers and 90 hydrogenotrophic methanogens (Wong et al., 2017). Although Cyanobacteria, 91 Proteobacteria and Bacteroidetes appear to be abundant in both marine and 92 hypersaline systems, Cyanobacteria are proposed to be particularly vital to these 4 bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/818625; this version posted March 14, 2020. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license. 93 formations through the combined effect of biofilm formation, carbon fixation, nitrogen 94 fixation and endolithic (boring) activity (Macintyre et al., 2000; Khodadad and Foster, 95 2012; Casaburi et al., 2016; Babilonia et al., 2018). 96 97 Peritidal tufa stromatolite systems are found along the southeastern coastline of South 98 Africa (SA). They are geographically isolated, occurring at coastal dune seeps 99 separated by stretches of coastline (Smith et al., 2018). In these systems, stromatolite 100 formations extend from freshwater to intertidal zones and are dominated by 101 Cyanobacteria, Bacteroidetes and Proteobacteria (Perissinotto et al., 2014). The 102 stromatolites are impacted by fluctuating environmental pressures caused by periodic 103 inundation by seawater, which affects the nutrient concentrations, temperature and 104 chemistry of the system (Rishworth et al., 2016). These formations are characterized by 105 their proximity to the ocean, where stromatolites in the upper formations receive 106 freshwater from the inflow seeps, middle formation stromatolites withstand a mix of 107 freshwater