DOCSLIB.ORG

OTC Derivatives Statistics at End-June 2015

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
OTC Derivatives Statistics at End-June 2015 Statistical release OTC derivatives statistics at end-June 2015 Monetary and Economic Department November 2015 Tools to access and download the OTC derivatives statistics: BIS website – tables in PDF of the BIS’s most current data BIS Statistics Explorer – a browsing tool for pre-defined views of the BIS’s most current data Data behind the charts in this release can be downloaded from the BIS website (www.bis.org/statistics/otc_hy1511_charts.zip). Questions about the OTC derivatives statistics may be addressed to [email protected]. This release is available on the BIS website (www.bis.org/publ/otc_hy.htm). © Bank for International Settlements 2015. All rights reserved. Brief excerpts may be reproduced or translated provided the source is stated. OTC derivatives statistics at end-June 2015 Contents 1. Highlights ........................................................................................................................................................................... 2 2. Recent developments in OTC derivatives markets ............................................................................................ 2 Interest rate derivatives ......................................................................................................................................................... 3 Foreign exchange derivatives .............................................................................................................................................. 4 Credit default swaps ............................................................................................................................................................... 4 Equity-linked and commodity derivatives ...................................................................................................................... 5 3. Charts ................................................................................................................................................................................... 7 Annexes .............................................................................................................................................................................................. 11 A Explanatory notes ................................................................................................................................................ 11 B Glossary of terms ................................................................................................................................................. 12 Data are subject to change. Revised data will be released concurrently with the forthcoming BIS Quarterly Review on 6 December 2015. The OTC derivatives statistics at end-December 2015 will be released no later than 13 May 2016. The term “country” as used in this release also covers territorial entities that are not states as understood by international law and practice but for which data are separately and independently maintained. New publication tables In September 2015, the BIS comprehensively revised the tables it publishes on derivatives statistics. The new tables consolidate in one set derivatives statistics that were previously presented in several different BIS publications. Table numbers in this release refer to the tables available on the BIS website. Data in the new tables are also available in a new interactive tool, the BIS Statistics Explorer, where the OTC derivatives statistics can be downloaded in CSV format as well as plotted in charts. An example of a chart showing the notional amount outstanding of all OTC derivatives contacts is shown here. OTC derivatives statistics at end-June 2015 1 1. Highlights Highlights from the latest BIS semiannual survey of over-the-counter (OTC) derivatives markets: Activity in global OTC derivatives markets fell in the first half of 2015. The notional amount of outstanding contracts declined from $629 trillion at end-December 2014 to $553 trillion at end- June 2015. Even after adjustment for the effect of exchange rate movements on positions denominated in currencies other than the US dollar, notional amounts were still down by about 10%. Trade compression to eliminate redundant contracts was the major driver of the decline. The gross market value of outstanding derivatives contracts – which provides a more meaningful measure of amounts at risk than notional amounts – declined even more sharply in the first half of 2015. Market values decreased from $20.9 trillion to $15.5 trillion between end- December 2014 and end-June 2015. The fall is likely to have been driven by the reduction in notional amounts outstanding as well as increases in long-term interest rates, which took yields back closer to those on outstanding swaps. Central clearing, a key element in global regulators’ agenda for reforming OTC derivatives markets to reduce systemic risks, made further inroads. In credit default swap markets, the share of outstanding contracts cleared through central counterparties rose from 29% to 31% in the first half of 2015. In interest rate derivatives markets too, central clearing is becoming increasingly important. 2. Recent developments in OTC derivatives markets The overall size of the over-the-counter derivatives market continued to contract in the first half of 2015. The notional amount of outstanding OTC derivatives contracts, which determines contractual payments and is one indicator of positions, fell by 12% between end-December 2014 and end-June 2015, from $629 trillion to $553 trillion (Graph 1, left-hand panel, in section 3 of this release and Table D5 on the BIS website). Over this period, exchange rate movements exaggerated the contraction of positions denominated in currencies other than the US dollar.1 Yet, even after adjustment for this effect, notional amounts at end-June 2015 were still about 10% lower than at end-December 2014. The gross market value of outstanding derivatives contracts – that is, the cost of replacing all outstanding contracts at market prices prevailing on the reporting date – sharply decreased in the first half of 2015 (Graph 1, centre panel).2 The decline is likely to have been caused by a combination of falling notional amounts and narrowing gaps between interest rates on the reporting date and rates at contract inception. Following a one-off increase in the second half of 2014, the latest semiannual decline brought gross market values back onto the downward trajectory they had been on since end-2011. Market values decreased from $20.9 trillion at end-December 2014 to $15.5 trillion at end-June 2015, their lowest level since 2007 (Graph 1, centre panel). 1 Positions are reported in US dollars, and thus changes between periods include the impact of exchange rate movements on positions denominated in currencies other than the US dollar. For example, the depreciation of the euro against the US dollar between end-December 2014 and end-June 2015 resulted in a decline in the reported US dollar value of positions denominated in euros. 2 The gross market value is calculated as the sum of the absolute value of gross positive market values and gross negative market values. The gross positive market value is the gain to derivatives dealers – and the gross negative market value the loss – if the dealers were to sell their outstanding contracts at market prices prevailing on the reporting date. 2 OTC derivatives statistics at end-June 2015 Market participants can reduce their exposure to counterparty credit risk through netting agreements and collateral. Gross credit exposures account for that by adjusting gross market values for legally enforceable bilateral netting agreements (although they do not take account of collateral). Gross credit exposures equalled $2.9 trillion at end-June 2015, down from $3.4 trillion at end-December 2014 (Graph 1, right-hand panel). This measure of counterparty credit risk represented 18.5% of gross market values at end-June 2015, which was slightly above the average since 2008 (16.0%). Interest rate derivatives The interest rate segment accounts for the majority of OTC derivatives activity. At end-June 2015, the notional amount of outstanding interest rate derivatives contracts totalled $435 trillion, which represented 79% of the global OTC derivatives market (Table D5). At $320 trillion, swaps account for by far the largest share of this market segment. Notional amounts fell sharply in the first half of 2015, driven by a contraction in euro- denominated interest rate contracts (Graph 3, left-hand panel). The notional value of euro contracts declined from $167 trillion to $126 trillion between end-December 2014 and end-June 2015 (or, equivalently, from €138 trillion to €113 trillion). Trade compression to eliminate redundant contracts was the major driver of the decline. The overall volume of compressions continued to grow in the first half of 2015, mainly affecting interest rate swaps cleared through central counterparties (CCPs).3 The notional value of interest rate contracts in other currencies also declined in the first half of 2015. US dollar contracts decreased from $173 trillion to $160 trillion between end-December 2014 and end-June 2015. Yen, sterling and Swiss franc contracts also decreased, after adjustment for the impact of exchange rate movements on the reported US dollar positions of interest rate derivatives denominated in those currencies. The gross market value of interest rate derivatives decreased from $15.6 trillion at end- December 2014 to $11.1 trillion at end-June
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Forward Contracts and Futures a Forward Is an Agreement Between Two Parties to Buy Or Sell an Asset at a Pre-Determined Future Time for a Certain Price
    Forward contracts and futures A forward is an agreement between two parties to buy or sell an asset at a pre-determined future time for a certain price. Goal To hedge against the price fluctuation of commodity. • Intension of purchase decided earlier, actual transaction done later. • The forward contract needs to specify the delivery price, amount, quality, delivery date, means of delivery, etc. Potential default of either party: writer or holder. Terminal payoff from forward contract payoff payoff K − ST ST − K K ST ST K long position short position K = delivery price, ST = asset price at maturity Zero-sum game between the writer (short position) and owner (long position). Since it costs nothing to enter into a forward contract, the terminal payoff is the investor’s total gain or loss from the contract. Forward price for a forward contract is defined as the delivery price which make the value of the contract at initiation be zero. Question Does it relate to the expected value of the commodity on the delivery date? Forward price = spot price + cost of fund + storage cost cost of carry Example • Spot price of one ton of wood is $10,000 • 6-month interest income from $10,000 is $400 • storage cost of one ton of wood is $300 6-month forward price of one ton of wood = $10,000 + 400 + $300 = $10,700. Explanation Suppose the forward price deviates too much from $10,700, the construction firm would prefer to buy the wood now and store that for 6 months (though the cost of storage may be higher).
    [Show full text]
  • Half-Yearly Financial Report at 30 June 2019
    Half-Yearly Financial Report at 30 June 2019 Contents Composition of the Corporate Bodies 3 The first half of 2019 in brief Economic figures and performance indicators 4 Equity figures and performance indicators 5 Accounting statements Balance Sheet 7 Income Statement 9 Statement of comprehensive income 10 Statements of Changes in Shareholders' Equity 11 Statement of Cash Flows 13 Report on Operations Macroeconomic situation 16 Economic results 18 Financial aggregates 22 Business 31 Operating structure 37 Significant events after the end of the half and business outlook 39 Other information 39 Notes to the Financial Statements Part A – Accounting policies 41 Part B – Information on the balance sheet 78 Part C – Information on the income statement 121 Part D – Comprehensive Income 140 Part E – Information on risks and relative hedging policies 143 Part F – Information on capital 155 Part H – Transactions with related parties 166 Part L – Segment reporting 173 Certification of the condensed Half-Yearly Financial Statements pursuant to Article 81-ter of 175 CONSOB Regulation 11971 of 14 May 1999, as amended Composition of the Corporate Bodies Board of Directors Chairperson Massimiliano Cesare Chief Executive Officer Bernardo Mattarella Director Pasquale Ambrogio Director Leonarda Sansone Director Gabriella Forte Board of Statutory Auditors Chairperson Paolo Palombelli Regular Auditor Carlo Ferocino Regular Auditor Marcella Galvani Alternate Auditor Roberto Micolitti Alternate Auditor Sofia Paternostro * * * Auditing Firm PricewaterhouseCoopers
    [Show full text]
  • D13 02 Pricing a Forward Contract V02 (With Notes)
    Derivatives Pricing a Forward / Futures Contract Professor André Farber Solvay Brussels School of Economics and Management Université Libre de Bruxelles Valuing forward contracts: Key ideas • Two different ways to own a unit of the underlying asset at maturity: – 1.Buy spot (SPOT PRICE: S0) and borrow => Interest and inventory costs – 2. Buy forward (AT FORWARD PRICE F0) • VALUATION PRINCIPLE: NO ARBITRAGE • In perfect markets, no free lunch: the 2 methods should cost the same. You can think of a derivative as a mixture of its constituent underliers, much as a cake is a mixture of eggs, flour and milk in carefully specified proportions. The derivative’s model provide a recipe for the mixture, one whose ingredients’ quantity vary with time. Emanuel Derman, Market and models, Risk July 2001 Derivatives 01 Introduction |2 Discount factors and interest rates • Review: Present value of Ct • PV(Ct) = Ct × Discount factor • With annual compounding: • Discount factor = 1 / (1+r)t • With continuous compounding: • Discount factor = 1 / ert = e-rt Derivatives 01 Introduction |3 Forward contract valuation : No income on underlying asset • Example: Gold (provides no income + no storage cost) • Current spot price S0 = $1,340/oz • Interest rate (with continuous compounding) r = 3% • Time until delivery (maturity of forward contract) T = 1 • Forward price F0 ? t = 0 t = 1 Strategy 1: buy forward 0 ST –F0 Strategy 2: buy spot and borrow Should be Buy spot -1,340 + ST equal Borrow +1,340 -1,381 0 ST -1,381 Derivatives 01 Introduction |4 Forward price and value of forward contract rT • Forward price: F0 = S0e • Remember: the forward price is the delivery price which sets the value of a forward contract equal to zero.
    [Show full text]
  • Eurodollar Futures, and Forwards
    5 Eurodollar Futures, and Forwards In this chapter we will learn about • Eurodollar Deposits • Eurodollar Futures Contracts, • Hedging strategies using ED Futures, • Forward Rate Agreements, • Pricing FRAs. • Hedging FRAs using ED Futures, • Constructing the Libor Zero Curve from ED deposit rates and ED Fu- tures. 5.1 EURODOLLAR DEPOSITS As discussed in chapter 2, Eurodollar (ED) deposits are dollar deposits main- tained outside the USA. They are exempt from Federal Reserve regulations that apply to domestic deposit markets. The interest rate that applies to ED deposits in interbank transactions is the LIBOR rate. The LIBOR spot market has maturities from a few days to 10 years but liquidity is the greatest 69 70 CHAPTER 5: EURODOLLAR FUTURES AND FORWARDS Table 5.1 LIBOR spot rates Dates 7day 1mth. 3mth 6mth 9mth 1yr LIBOR 1.000 1.100 1.160 1.165 1.205 1.337 within one year. Table 5.1 shows LIBOR spot rates over a year as of January 14th 2004. In the ED deposit market, deposits are traded between banks for ranges of maturities. If one million dollars is borrowed for 45 days at a LIBOR rate of 5.25%, the interest is 45 Interest = 1m × 0.0525 = $6562.50 360 The rate quoted assumes settlement will occur two days after the trade. Banks are willing to lend money to firms at the Libor rate provided their credit is comparable to these strong banks. If their credit is weaker, then the lending bank may quote a rate as a spread over the Libor rate. 5.2 THE TED SPREAD Banks that offer LIBOR deposits have the potential to default.
    [Show full text]
  • LIBOR Fallback and Quantitative Finance
    risks Article LIBOR Fallback and Quantitative Finance Marc Pierre Henrard 1,2 1 muRisQ Advisory, 8B-1210 Brussels, Belgium; [email protected] 2 University College London, London WC1E 6BT, UK Received: 19 April 2019; Accepted: 5 August 2019; Published: 15 August 2019 Abstract: With the expected discontinuation of the LIBOR publication, a robust fallback for related financial instruments is paramount. In recent months, several consultations have taken place on the subject. The results of the first ISDA consultation have been published in November 2018 and a new one just finished at the time of writing. This note describes issues associated to the proposed approaches and potential alternative approaches in the framework and the context of quantitative finance. It evidences a clear lack of details and lack of measurability of the proposed approaches which would not be achievable in practice. It also describes the potential of asymmetrical information between market participants coming from the adjustment spread computation. In the opinion of this author, a fundamental revision of the fallback’s foundations is required. Keywords: LIBOR fallback; derivative pricing; multi-curve framework; collateral; pay-off measurability; value transfer; ISDA consultations 1. Introduction Since their creation in 1986, LIBOR benchmarks1 have grown in importance to the point of being called in finance newspapers the most important number in the world. This was the case up to July 2017, when Bailey(2017), the CEO of the U.K. Financial Conduct Authority (FCA), indicated in a speech that there is an increased expectation that some LIBOR benchmarks will be discontinued in a not too distant future.
    [Show full text]
  • Liquidity Effects in Options Markets: Premium Or Discount?
    Liquidity Effects in Options Markets: Premium or Discount? PRACHI DEUSKAR1 2 ANURAG GUPTA MARTI G. SUBRAHMANYAM3 March 2007 ABSTRACT This paper examines the effects of liquidity on interest rate option prices. Using daily bid and ask prices of euro (€) interest rate caps and floors, we find that illiquid options trade at higher prices relative to liquid options, controlling for other effects, implying a liquidity discount. This effect is opposite to that found in all studies on other assets such as equities and bonds, but is consistent with the structure of this over-the-counter market and the nature of the demand and supply forces. We also identify a systematic factor that drives changes in the liquidity across option maturities and strike rates. This common liquidity factor is associated with lagged changes in investor perceptions of uncertainty in the equity and fixed income markets. JEL Classification: G10, G12, G13, G15 Keywords: Liquidity, interest rate options, euro interest rate markets, Euribor market, volatility smiles. 1 Department of Finance, College of Business, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 304C David Kinley Hall, 1407 West Gregory Drive, Urbana, IL 61801. Ph: (217) 244-0604, Fax: (217) 244-9867, E-mail: [email protected]. 2 Department of Banking and Finance, Weatherhead School of Management, Case Western Reserve University, 10900 Euclid Avenue, Cleveland, Ohio 44106-7235. Ph: (216) 368-2938, Fax: (216) 368-6249, E-mail: [email protected]. 3 Department of Finance, Leonard N. Stern School of Business, New York University, 44 West Fourth Street #9-15, New York, NY 10012-1126. Ph: (212) 998-0348, Fax: (212) 995-4233, E- mail: [email protected].
    [Show full text]
  • Frequently Asked Questions on the Basel III Standardised Approach for Measuring Counterparty Credit Risk Exposures, March 2018
    This standard has been integrated into the consolidated Basel Framework: https://www.bis.org/basel_framework/ Basel Committee on Banking Supervision Frequently asked questions on the Basel III standardised approach for measuring counterparty credit risk exposures March 2018 (update of FAQs published in August 2015) This publication is available on the BIS website (www.bis.org). © Bank for International Settlements 2018. All rights reserved. Brief excerpts may be reproduced or translated provided the source is stated. ISBN 978-92-9259-149-6 (online) Contents The standardised approach for measuring counterparty credit risk exposures: Frequently asked questions ............................................................................................................................................................................ 1 Introduction ......................................................................................................................................................................................... 1 1. General formula ............................................................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Capping of margined EAD at otherwise unmargined EAD ................................................................... 1 1.2 Collateral taken outside of netting sets ........................................................................................................ 1 2. PFE add-on .......................................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • MAFS601A – Exotic Swaps • Forward Rate Agreements and Interest Rate
    MAFS601A – Exotic swaps • Forward rate agreements and interest rate swaps • Asset swaps • Total return swaps • Swaptions • Credit default swaps • Differential swaps • Constant maturity swaps 1 Forward rate agreement (FRA) The FRA is an agreement between two counterparties to exchange floating and fixed interest payments on the future settlement date T2. • The floating rate will be the LIBOR rate L[T1, T2] as observed on the future reset date T1. Recall that the implied forward rate over the future period [T1, T2] has been fixed by the current market prices of discount bonds ma- turing at T1 and T2. The fixed rate is expected to be equal to the implied forward rate over the same period as observed today. 2 Determination of the forward price of LIBOR L[T1, T2] = LIBOR rate observed at future time T1 for the accrual period [T1, T2] K = fixed rate N = notional of the FRA Cash flow of the fixed rate receiver 3 Cash flow of the fixed rate receiver collect N+NK(T22 -T) fromT- maturitybond floating rate 2 LT,T[12 ]is reset at T1 reset date settlement date tTT12 collect N atT1 from T1-maturity bond; collect invest in bank N+NLT(,)12 T account earning (-)TT21 LTT[12 , ]rate of interest 4 Valuation principle Apparently, the cash flow at T2 is uncertain since LIBOR L[T1, T2] is set (or known) at T1. Can we construct portfolio of discount bonds that replicate the cash flow? • For convenience of presenting the argument, we add N to both floating and fixed rate payments.
    [Show full text]
  • Taxation of Financial Derivatives
    TAXATION OF FINANCIAL DERIVATIVES By Shefali Goradia* NISHITH DESAI ASSOCIATES** International Research Center A/201 Milton Apts., Juhu, Santacruz (West), Mumbai 400 049 India Chambers 93-B Mittal Court, Nariman Point, Mumbai 400 021 Tel: +91 22 282 0609 / 204 0068 Fax: +91 22 287 5792 Email: [email protected] Website: www.nishithdesai.com Nishith Desai Associates© 2 * Shefali Goradia is a member at Nishith Desai Associates, International Legal and Tax Counsellors. She is a Chartered Accountant, (Gold Medallist) 1991 along with B.Com. University of Bombay, Sydenham College of Commerce and Economics 1988. Her practice areas include International Taxation, Globalization, International Finance, Structuring of Inbound/Outbound Investments, Structuring of Offshore Funds, Taxation of EPC Contracts, Taxation of E-Commerce, Taxation of Insurance and Tax Planning for Entertainers. Some papers presented by her include "Non-Resident Indians" at the World NRI Forum Conference, 1996; "Structuring Offshore Funds for Investment in Indo-Asian Region," International Bar Association, 1997; "Foreign Investment into India — in comparison to China," OFC Asia Pacific Journal, December 1996, Campden Publications, London; "Setting Up Software Operations in India," The Indus Entrepreneurs (TiE) Conference, Santa Clara, April, 1998; "International Taxation of Software," International Tax Planning Conference, BMA, India, December, 1998. Taxation of e-commerce in India, Global Information Infrastructure Commission conference organized by CII & IL&FS, 1999, "Permanent Establishments and Business Profits", WIRC of Institute of Chartered Accountants of India, 1999. ** Nishith Desai Associates is an international legal and tax consultancy firm. It focuses on advanced legal practice, especially in the areas of globalization, international finance and tax laws, corporate laws and high technology & infrastructure law.
    [Show full text]
  • Interest Rate Hedging Compliance, Audit and Risk
    B O N N E V I L L E P O W E R A D M I N I S T R A T I O N BPA Policy 231-5 Interest Rate Hedging Compliance, Audit and Risk Table of Contents 1.1 Purpose & Background ............................................................................................................ 2 1.2 Policy Owner ............................................................................................................................. 2 1.3 Applicability ............................................................................................................................... 2 1.4 Terms & Definitions .................................................................................................................. 2 1.5 Policy ......................................................................................................................................... 5 1.6 Policy Exceptions ....................................................................................................................... 5 1.7 Responsibilities ......................................................................................................................... 5 1.8 Standards & Procedures ........................................................................................................... 7 1.9 Performance & Monitoring ..................................................................................................... 12 1.10 Authorities & References ...................................................................................................... 13 1.11
    [Show full text]
  • Information About Forward Rate Agreement –
    Information about Forward rate agreement – FRA This fact sheet provides general information about forward rate agreements traded through Danske Bank. AN OTC TRANSACTION WITH DANSKE BANK AS COUNTERPARTY. WHAT IS A FORWARD RATE A forward rate agreement (FRA) is an agreement between two parties that AGREEMENT (FRA) determines a future rate of interest with a single interest rate payment date. The FRA contract constitutes a tool in management of short-term interest rate risk. The contract base is generally 3-month XIBOR (STIBOR). The contract is often traded with standardized expiration days, i.e. IMM days. This means that liquidity is concentrated to a limited number of contracts. FRAs can be traded as a future admitted to trading on a regulated market or over-the-counter (OTC) with Danske Bank as the counterparty. Instruments admitted to trading on a regulated market are standardised. Strike rates, expiry dates and amounts are fixed by the regulated market, and specific procedures are in place for settlement of losses and gains at the end of each trading day. OTC transactions can be tailored to specific needs but may also be traded on standardised terms and conditions. This is the case when OTC transactions are derived from futures admitted to trading on a regulated market. Such transactions are settled exclusively on expiry. The buyer of an FRA hedges against rising interest rates at a future date (i.e. counterparty paying a fixed rate), while the seller hedges against falling interest rates (i.e. counterparty receiving a fixed rate). An FRA is settled by calculating the difference at the beginning of the interest period – based on the difference between the agreed interest rate and the current market rate for the period.
    [Show full text]
  • Forward Rate Agreements
    Product Briefing – Forward Rate Agreements A forward contract is economically equivalent to a futures contract in that it will involve the fixing of a price at the point of execution for delivery at some future date. An entity trading an over the counter forward will not be faced with the constraints of contract standardization that are a feature of exchange – traded contracts. Forwards allow the user greater flexibility in specifying deal parameters such as transaction size and maturity dates. Although something of a generalization the majority of forward contracts will be cash settled. So a cash settled bond forward would fix the price of the bond for future delivery but the final settlement would not require the exchange of the asset for cash. Instead the seller of the contract will pay a cash sum equal to the current market value of the bond and the buyer will pay the fixed price originally agreed upon. A forward deal is a contractual commitment which cannot be terminated unless both parties to the deal agree mutually to end the transaction. Forward Rate Agreements A forward rate agreement (FRA) is an over the counter (OTC) transaction that fixes a single interest rate for a single period, at an agreed date in the future. The start of the period the rate will be fixed for, and its length, is negotiated between the contract buyer and seller. So a FRA transaction that locks in the 3 month rate in 3 months’ time is referred to as a 3/6 or 3s6s transaction. The first number indicates the effective date of the transaction, the final number the maturity and the difference between the two indicates the tenor of the interest rate that is being fixed.
    [Show full text]