DOCSLIB.ORG

The Role of Probiotics, Prebiotics and Synbiotics in Animal Nutrition Paulina Markowiak* and Katarzyna Śliżewska*

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Role of Probiotics, Prebiotics and Synbiotics in Animal Nutrition Paulina Markowiak* and Katarzyna Śliżewska* Markowiak and Śliżewska Gut Pathog (2018) 10:21 https://doi.org/10.1186/s13099-018-0250-0 Gut Pathogens REVIEW Open Access The role of probiotics, prebiotics and synbiotics in animal nutrition Paulina Markowiak* and Katarzyna Śliżewska* Abstract Along with the intensive development of methods of livestock breeding, breeders’ expectations are growing concern- ing feed additives that would guarantee such results as accelerating growth rate, protection of health from patho- genic infections and improvement of other production parameters such as: absorption of feed and quality of meat, milk, eggs. The main reason for their application would be a strive to achieve some benefcial efects comparable to those of antibiotic-based growth stimulators, banned on 01 January 2006. High hopes are being associated with the use of probiotics, prebiotics and synbiotics. Used mainly for maintenance of the equilibrium of the intestinal micro- biota of livestock, they turn out to be an efective method in fght against pathogens posing a threat for both animals and consumers. This paper discusses defnitions of probiotics, prebiotics and synbiotics. Criteria that have to be met by those kinds of formulas are also presented. The paper ofers a list of the most commonly used probiotics and prebi- otics and some examples of their combinations in synbiotic formulas used in animal feeding. Examples of available study results on the efect of probiotics, prebiotics and synbiotics on animal health are also summarised. Keywords: Animal health, Prebiotics, Probiotic bacteria, Synbiotics Background quality and safety of meat, while taking animal welfare It is estimated that by 2050 the number of people in the and respect for the natural environment into account. world will reach 9 billion. Constant growth of the human Both animal feed and feed supplements have to meet population is inseparably associated with a growing some strict criteria, without a simultaneous rise of ani- demand for food of plant and animal origin. For that rea- mal breeding costs. In the past, antibiotics and other son, scientists are looking for solutions allowing intensi- medicinal products had been broadly used, mainly in fcation of food production, with simultaneous reduction order to modify the alimentary microbiota and to boost of production costs, and in compliance with high stand- productivity and animal growth. Long-term use of those ards of quality and safety (for both people and the envi- substances has led to development of drug-resistant ronment). Types of used feed additives afect animal microorganisms, posing a threat to consumers’ health health and increased production of high quality meat, and exerting a negative efect on the environment [1, 2]. eggs, milk and fsh. Animal production is inseparable As a result, on 1 January 2006 the use of antibiotic-based from nutrition and health of the consumer, and animal growth stimulators was banned in the European Union. intestinal pathogens, such as Campylobacter, Salmonella, Terefore, alternative natural substances ensuring simi- Listeria and Yersinia, are a direct source of food contami- lar efects have been sought. Te Regulation (EC) No. nation and a cause of zoonoses. Terefore, new methods 1831/2003 of the European Parliament and of the Council of animal breeding are introduced, aimed at increased of 22 September 2003 on additives used in animal nutri- tion, mentions probiotics and prebiotics among other substances, whereas in the Regulation (EC) No. 767/2009 *Correspondence: [email protected]; on the placing on the market and use of feed, this aspect [email protected] was not changed. High hopes are also evoked in relation Department of Biotechnology and Food Sciences, Institute to the synergistic combination of both these components, of Fermentation Technology and Microbiology, Lodz University of Technology, ul. Wólczańska 171/173, 90‑924 Lodz, Poland namely the so-called synbiotics. © The Author(s) 2018. This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creat​iveco​mmons​.org/licen​ses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creat​iveco​mmons​.org/ publi​cdoma​in/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. Markowiak and Śliżewska Gut Pathog (2018) 10:21 Page 2 of 20 Probiotics poultry. Tat type of formulas may contain one or more Te term “probiotic” comes from two Greek words (“pro” selected strains of microorganisms, and depending on and “bios”) and it means “for life”. Te frst concept of the species and age of host animals they may be admin- probiotics was probably suggested in 1907 by Mechnikov istered as a powder, suspension, capsules, pellet, gel or [3], who noted that bacteria may have a benefcial infu- paste. Tey are used periodically or constantly, directly ence on the natural intestinal microfora. Te term of per os or as an additive to feed and premixes. Probiotic “probiotic” was probably invented by Ferdinand Vergin, cultures used as feed additives must meet some specifc who in his paper of 1954 entitled “Anti- und Probiotika” criteria. compared a harmful efect of antibiotics and other anti- microbial agents on the intestinal microbiota with a ben- Selection criteria and requirements for probiotic strains efcial efect (“probiotica”) of selected bacteria [4]. With Assessment of the safety of probiotic strains is necessary time, the defnition of probiotic was largely modifed for the optimization of their use. However, it is not an (Table 1). easy task [20]. Te mode of action of probiotics as micro- Te current defnition formulated in 2002 by FAO and bial additives to feed is not fully understood. By adhering WHO working group experts states that probiotics are to the alimentary tract probiotic organisms may survive “live strains of strictly selected microorganisms which, difcult conditions, and ofer a benefcial efect on the when administered in adequate amounts, confer a health stability and protection of the intestinal ecosystem. Tey beneft on the host” [15]. Te defnition was in 2013 also infuence the course of digestive and metabolic pro- maintained by the International Scientifc Association for cesses and the immunological response. Consequently, Probiotics and Prebiotics (ISAPP). Te term “probiotic’ is properties of probiotics lead to improved health of ani- reserved for formulas or products that meet some strictly mals, increased productivity [21], and improved immu- defned criteria. Te most important of these criteria nity of the host [22]. include: an appropriate count of viable cells, a benefcial Te immunomodulatory mechanism action of probiot- efect on a host’s health (which may also involve stimu- ics involved in animal health and diseases is particularly lation of growth), and a benefcial efect on the function important and is based on innate or adaptive immune of the alimentary tract. Efcacy of probiotic preparations system. Te gastro-intestinal lumen contains essential depends on numerous factors. For that reason proper nutrients and benefcial microorganisms, but also patho- selection of bacterial strains and application of a cor- gen microorganisms, toxins, and some foreign antigens rect dose are highly important. Due to their benefcial [23, 24]. Epithelial cells in the GIT mucosa create a selec- efect on health and stimulation of growth, probiotics are tively permeable barrier between the lumen environment broadly used in animal feeds, particularly for pigs and and the internal body tissues [25]. Tis barrier is the frst Table 1 Defnitions of probiotics Year Defnitions 1965 A substance secreted by one microorganism which stimulates the growth of another [5] 1971 Tissue extracts which stimulate microbial growth [6] 1974 Organisms and substances that contribute to intestinal microbial balance [7] 1989 Live microbial feed supplement which benefcially afects the host animal by improving microbial balance [8] 1992 Viable mono- or mixed culture of live microorganisms which, applied to animals or man, have a benefcial efect on the host by improving the properties of the indigenous microfora [9] 1996 A live microbial culture or cultured dairy product that benefcially infuences the health and nutrition of the host [10] 1996 Living microorganisms which, upon ingestion in certain numbers, exert health benefts beyond inherent basic nutrition [11] 1998 Living microorganisms that on ingestion in certain numbers exert health benefts beyond inherent basic nutrition [12] 1999 A microbial dietary adjuvant that benefcially afects the host physiology by modulating mucosal and systemic immunity, as well as improving nutritional and microbial balance in the intestinal tract [13] 2001 A preparation of or a product containing viable, defned microorganisms in sufcient numbers, which alter the microfora (by implantation or colonization) in a compartment of the host and by that exert benefcial health efect in this host [14] 2002 Live strains of strictly selected microorganisms which, when administered in adequate amounts, confer a health beneft on the host [15] 2004 Preparation of viable microorganisms that is consumed by humans or other animals with the aim of inducing benefcial efects by qualitatively or quantitatively infuencing
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Bifidobacterium Bifidum Strains for Application In
    (19) TZZ _ _T (11) EP 2 481 299 B1 (12) EUROPEAN PATENT SPECIFICATION (45) Date of publication and mention (51) Int Cl.: of the grant of the patent: A23L 33/135 (2016.01) A61K 35/745 (2015.01) 07.12.2016 Bulletin 2016/49 (21) Application number: 11000744.0 (22) Date of filing: 31.01.2011 (54) BIFIDOBACTERIUM BIFIDUM STRAINS FOR APPLICATION IN GASTROINTESTINAL DISEASES BIFIDOBACTERIUM-BIFIDUM-STÄMME ZUR ANWENDUNG BEI MAGEN-DARM-ERKRANKUNGEN SOUCHES DE BIFIDOBACTERIUM BIFIDUM POUR APPLICATION DANS LES MALADIES GASTRO-INTESTINALES (84) Designated Contracting States: • GUGLIELMETTI ET AL.: "Study of the adhesion AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB of Bifidobacterium bifidum MIMBb75 to human GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO intestinal cell lines", CURR MICROBIOLOGY, vol. PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR 59, 2009, pages 167-172, XP002634994, • PREISING ET AL: "Selection of Bifidobacteria (43) Date of publication of application: based on adhesion and anti-inflammatory 01.08.2012 Bulletin 2012/31 capacity in vitro for amelioration of Murine colitis", APPLIED AND (73) Proprietor: Dr. Fischer Gesundheitsprodukte ENVIRONMENTALMICROBIOLOGY, vol. 76, no. GmbH 9, May 2010 (2010-05), pages 3048-3051, 82166 Gräfelfing (DE) XP002634995, • LI-QUN ET AL.: "Influence of cell surface (72) Inventors: properties on adhesion ability of bifidobacteria", • Guglielmetti, Simone, Dr. WORLD J. MICROBIOL. BIOTECHNOL., vol. 26, 20122 Milano (IT) 2010, pages 1999-2007, XP002634996, • Mora, Diego, Dr. • DUFFY L C ET AL: "Effectiveness of 20122 Milano (IT) Bifidobacterium bifidum in mediating the clinical course of murine rotavirus diarrhea", PEDIATRIC (74) Representative: Wichmann, Hendrik RESEARCH, WILLIAMS AND WILKINS, Wuesthoff & Wuesthoff BALTIMORE, MD, US, [Online] vol.
    [Show full text]
  • Growth of Bifidobacteria in Mammalian Milk
    Czech J. Anim. Sci., 58, 2013 (3): 99–105 Original Paper Growth of bifidobacteria in mammalian milk Š. Ročková1, V. Rada1, J. Havlík1, R. Švejstil1, E. Vlková1, V. Bunešová1, K. Janda2, I. Profousová3,4 1Department of Microbiology, Nutrition and Dietetics, Faculty of Agrobiology, Food and Natural Resources, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Prague, Czech Republic 2Department of General Husbandry and Ethology of Animals, Faculty of Agrobiology, Food and Natural Resources, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Prague, Czech Republic 3Department of Parasitology, University of Veterinary and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Brno, Czech Republic 4Institute of Vertebrate Biology, Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, Brno, Czech Republic ABSTRACT: Microbial colonization of the mammalian intestine begins at birth, when from a sterile state a newborn infant is exposed to an external environment rich in various bacterial species. An important group of intestinal bacteria comprises bifidobacteria. Bifidobacteria represent major intestinal microbiota during the breast-feeding period. Animal milk contains all crucial nutrients for babies’ intestinal microflora. The aim of our work was to test the influence of different mammalian milk on the growth of bifidobacteria. The growth of seven strains of bifidobacteria in human milk, the colostrum of swine, cow’s milk, sheep’s milk, and rabbit’s milk was tested. Good growth accompanied by the production of lactic acid was observed not only in human milk, but also in the other kinds of milk in all three strains of Bifidobacterium bifidum of different origin. Human milk selectively supported the production of lactic acid of human bifidobacterial isolates, especially the Bifidobacterium bifidum species.
    [Show full text]
  • Bifidobacterium Bifidum: a Key Member of the Early Human Gut
    microorganisms Review Bifidobacterium bifidum: A Key Member of the Early Human Gut Microbiota Francesca Turroni 1,2,*, Sabrina Duranti 1, Christian Milani 1, Gabriele Andrea Lugli 1, Douwe van Sinderen 3,4 and Marco Ventura 1,2 1 Laboratory of Probiogenomics, Department of Chemistry, Life Sciences and Environmental Sustainability, University of Parma, 43124 Parma, Italy; [email protected] (S.D.); [email protected] (C.M.); [email protected] (G.A.L.); [email protected] (M.V.) 2 Microbiome Research Hub, University of Parma, 43124 Parma, Italy 3 School of Microbiology, University College Cork, T12 YT20 Cork, Ireland; [email protected] 4 APC Microbiome Institute, University College Cork, T12 YT20 Cork, Ireland * Correspondence: [email protected] Received: 2 October 2019; Accepted: 7 November 2019; Published: 9 November 2019 Abstract: Bifidobacteria typically represent the most abundant bacteria of the human gut microbiota in healthy breast-fed infants. Members of the Bifidobacterium bifidum species constitute one of the dominant taxa amongst these bifidobacterial communities and have been shown to display notable physiological and genetic features encompassing adhesion to epithelia as well as metabolism of host-derived glycans. In the current review, we discuss current knowledge concerning particular biological characteristics of the B. bifidum species that support its specific adaptation to the human gut and their implications in terms of supporting host health. Keywords: Bifidobacterium bifidum; bifidobacteria; probiotics; genomics; microbiota 1. General Features of the Genus Bifidobacterium The genus Bifidobacterium belongs to the Actinobacteria phylum and this genus together with nine other genera constitute the Bifidobacteriaceae family [1].
    [Show full text]
  • Probiotic G.I. 60'S
    Product Information Sheet – August 2015 Probiotic G.I. Introduced 2010 What Is It? derived from corn dextrose fermentation and palm oil. Pure Encapsulations® probiotic products contain a unique form of Probiotic G.I. is a shelf-stable probiotic blend designed to support gut rice starch produced through a natural enzymatic process. This associated lymphoid tissue composition and function, gastrointestinal proprietary starch has been extensively tested and is added to cell health and immune response in the G.I. tract. Each capsule provides protect the viability of the probiotic organisms. 10 billion CFU of the beneficial bacteria Lactobacillus acidophilus, Lactobacillus salivarius, Lactobacillus casei, Bifidobacterium bifidum, Recommendations Bifidobacterium lactis and Streptococcus thermophilus.* Pure Encapsulations recommends 1–2 capsules daily, in divided Uses For Probiotic G.I. doses, with or between meals. Healthy Immune Response in the G.I. Tract: Probiotics are key players Are There Any Potential Side Effects Or in gastrointestinal health, promoting intestinal integrity and comfort. Precautions? Supplement use promotes colonization of the G.I. tract by competing for nutrients and attachment sites, and producing compounds which Probiotics may result in mild flatulence, which should subside limit the ability of certain microbes to adhere. Research indicates that with continued use. They may be contraindicated for use with the strains included in Probiotic G.I. provide particular support for a immunocompromised individuals. If pregnant or lactating, consult healthy immune response within the G.I. tract. Beneficial microflora your physician before taking this product. are crucial for proper gut associated lymphoid tissue (GALT) function Are There Any Potential Drug Interactions? and development.
    [Show full text]
  • The Bifidogenic Effect Revisited—Ecology and Health Perspectives
    microorganisms Review The Bifidogenic Effect Revisited—Ecology and Health Perspectives of Bifidobacterial Colonization in Early Life Himanshu Kumar 1, Maria Carmen Collado 2,3 , Harm Wopereis 1 , Seppo Salminen 3 , Jan Knol 1,4 and Guus Roeselers 1,* 1 Danone Nutricia Research, 3584 CT Utrecht, The Netherlands; [email protected] (H.K.); [email protected] (H.W.); [email protected] (J.K.) 2 Department of Biotechnology, Institute of Agrochemistry and Food Technology-Spanish National Research Council (IATA-CSIC), Paterna, 46980 Valencia, Spain; [email protected] 3 Functional Foods Forum, Faculty of Medicine, University of Turku, 20500 Turku, Finland; seppo.salminen@utu.fi 4 Laboratory for Microbiology, Wageningen University, 6708 PB Wageningen, The Netherlands * Correspondence: [email protected] Received: 22 October 2020; Accepted: 23 November 2020; Published: 25 November 2020 Abstract: Extensive microbial colonization of the infant gastrointestinal tract starts after parturition. There are several parallel mechanisms by which early life microbiome acquisition may proceed, including early exposure to maternal vaginal and fecal microbiota, transmission of skin associated microbes, and ingestion of microorganisms present in breast milk. The crucial role of vertical transmission from the maternal microbial reservoir during vaginal delivery is supported by the shared microbial strains observed among mothers and their babies and the distinctly different gut microbiome composition of caesarean-section born infants. The healthy infant colon is often dominated by members of the keystone genus Bifidobacterium that have evolved complex genetic pathways to metabolize different glycans present in human milk. In exchange for these host-derived nutrients, bifidobacteria’s saccharolytic activity results in an anaerobic and acidic gut environment that is protective against enteropathogenic infection.
    [Show full text]
  • The Infant Gut Microbiome As a Microbial Organ Influencing Host
    Turroni et al. Italian Journal of Pediatrics (2020) 46:16 https://doi.org/10.1186/s13052-020-0781-0 REVIEW Open Access The infant gut microbiome as a microbial organ influencing host well-being Francesca Turroni1,2, Christian Milani1, Sabrina Duranti1, Gabriele Andrea Lugli1, Sergio Bernasconi2, Abelardo Margolles3,4, Francesco Di Pierro5, Douwe van Sinderen6 and Marco Ventura1,2* Abstract Initial establishment of the human gut microbiota is generally believed to occur immediately following birth, involving key gut commensals such as bifidobacteria that are acquired from the mother. The subsequent development of this early gut microbiota is driven and modulated by specific dietary compounds present in human milk that support selective colonization. This represents a very intriguing example of host-microbe co- evolution, where both partners are believed to benefit. In recent years, various publications have focused on dissecting microbial infant gut communities and their interaction with their human host, being a determining factor in host physiology and metabolic activities. Such studies have highlighted a reduction of microbial diversity and/or an aberrant microbiota composition, sometimes referred to as dysbiosis, which may manifest itself during the early stage of life, i.e., in infants, or later stages of life. There are growing experimental data that may explain how the early human gut microbiota affects risk factors related to adult health conditions. This concept has fueled the development of various nutritional strategies, many of which are based on probiotics and/or prebiotics, to shape the infant microbiota. In this review, we will present the current state of the art regarding the infant gut microbiota and the role of key commensal microorganisms like bifidobacteria in the establishment of the first microbial communities in the human gut.
    [Show full text]
  • Technological Aspects Related to the Use of Bifidobacteria in Dairy Products Denis Roy
    Technological aspects related to the use of bifidobacteria in dairy products Denis Roy To cite this version: Denis Roy. Technological aspects related to the use of bifidobacteria in dairy products. Le Lait, INRA Editions, 2005, 85 (1-2), pp.39-56. hal-00895593 HAL Id: hal-00895593 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00895593 Submitted on 1 Jan 2005 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. Lait 85 (2005) 39–56 © INRA, EDP Sciences, 2005 39 DOI: 10.1051/lait:2004026 Review Technological aspects related to the use of bifidobacteria in dairy products Denis ROY* Institute of Nutraceuticals and Functional Foods and Centre STELA, Laval University, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada Abstract – Dairy-related bifidobacteria are already used in a wide variety of probiotic dairy products including milk, cheese, frozen yoghurt-like product and ice cream. The survival of bifidobacteria in fermented dairy products depends on varied factors such as the strain of bacteria used, fermentation conditions, storage temperature, and preservation methods. Growth of bifidobacteria in milk is often slow or limited compared with lactic acid bacteria used in fermented dairy products, and this appears partially due to low proteolytic activities.
    [Show full text]
  • Comparative Genomic and Phylogenomic Analyses of The
    Lugli et al. BMC Genomics (2017) 18:568 DOI 10.1186/s12864-017-3955-4 RESEARCHARTICLE Open Access Comparative genomic and phylogenomic analyses of the Bifidobacteriaceae family Gabriele Andrea Lugli1, Christian Milani1, Francesca Turroni1, Sabrina Duranti1, Leonardo Mancabelli1, Marta Mangifesta2, Chiara Ferrario1, Monica Modesto3, Paola Mattarelli3, Killer Jiří4,5, Douwe van Sinderen6 and Marco Ventura1* Abstract Background: Members of the Bifidobacteriaceae family represent both dominant microbial groups that colonize the gut of various animals, especially during the suckling stage of their life, while they also occur as pathogenic bacteria of the urogenital tract. The pan-genome of the genus Bifidobacterium has been explored in detail in recent years, though genomics of the Bifidobacteriaceae family has not yet received much attention. Here, a comparative genomic analyses of 67 Bifidobacteriaceae (sub) species including all currently recognized genera of this family, i.e., Aeriscardovia, Alloscardovia, Bifidobacterium, Bombiscardovia, Gardnerella, Neoscardovia, Parascardovia, Pseudoscardovia and Scardovia, was performed. Furthermore, in order to include a representative of each of the 67 (currently recognized) (sub) species belonging to the Bifidobacteriaceae family, we sequenced the genomes of an additional 11 species from this family, accomplishing the most extensive comparative genomic analysis performed within this family so far. Results: Phylogenomics-based analyses revealed the deduced evolutionary pathway followed by each member
    [Show full text]
  • Analysis of Potential Host-Colonization Factors in Bifidobacterium Bifidum S17
    Analysis of potential host-colonization factors in Bifidobacterium bifidum S17 Dissertation zur Erlangung des Doktorgrades Dr. rer. nat. der Fakultät für Naturwissenschaften der Universität Ulm vorgelegt von Christina Westermann aus Ulm 2015 Amtierender Dekan: Prof. Dr. Joachim Ankerhold Erstgutachter: PD Dr. Christian Riedel Zweitgutachter: Prof. Dr. Bernhard Eikmanns Tag der mündlichen Prüfung: 15.10.2015 Die vorliegende Arbeit wurde im Institut für Mikrobiologie und Biotechnologie an der Universität Ulm angefertigt. Die Arbeit wurde durch ein Stipendium nach dem Landesgraduiertenförderungsgesetz Baden-Württemberg finanziert. TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. Introduction ....................................................................................................................... 8 1.1. General features of the genus Bifidobacterium ................................................................. 8 1.2. Bifidobacteria as a part of the human microbiota ............................................................. 9 1.3. Bifidobacteria as probiotics .............................................................................................. 10 1.3.1. Definition of probiotics ........................................................................................ 10 1.3.2. Probiotic bifidobacteria and their health-promoting effect on human host ....... 11 1.4. Potential adhesive structures of the human gut.............................................................. 12 1.4.1. Mucus ..................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Probiotics for Specific Treatment of Pain in Irritable Bowel Syndrome: a Review
    Review articles Probiotics for Specific Treatment of Pain in Irritable Bowel Syndrome: A Review María Ortiz Lucas, Lic,1 Aurelio Tobías,2 Pablo Saz Peiró, MD,3 Juan José Sebastián, MD.4 1 BSc and Credential in Biochemistry, Professor in the Abstract Faculty of Health Sciences at the Universidad San Jorge in Zaragoza, Spain Abdominal pain is one of the least well tolerated symptoms in patients with irritable bowel syndrome (IBS). [email protected] Studies conducted in recent years suggest that dysbiosis in these patients may be responsible, at least in part, 2 Investigator at IDAEA (Instituto de Diagnóstico for these symptoms. This literature review indicates that probiotics may be an effective therapy for the relief Ambiental y Estudios del Agua -Institute of Environmental Assessment and Water Research, of pain in patients with IBS and recognizes that the effects of probiotics are specific to the strain used. In this CSIC. Barcelona, Spain article we review the effect that each strain or mixture of probiotics has for relieving abdominal pain according [email protected] to published clinical trials and we also discuss possible mechanisms of action. New perspectives are proposed 3 Professor in the Faculty of Medicine at the Universidad de Zaragoza in Zaragoza, Spain for research to elucidate the mechanisms of probiotic action for relief of abdominal pain in these patients. [email protected] 4 Professor in the Faculty of Medicine and Chief of Gastroenterology at the Hospital Royo Villanova in Keywords Zaragoza, Spain Probiotics, irritable bowel syndrome, abdominal pain, mechanism of action. [email protected] ......................................... Received: 04-10-13 Accepted: 08-15-14 IRRITABLE BOWEL SYNDROME AND MICROBIOTA various subtypes of IBS.
    [Show full text]
  • The Role of Bifidobacterium Breve As Food Supplement for The
    nutrients Review Therapeutic Microbiology: The Role of Bifidobacterium breve as Food Supplement for the Prevention/Treatment of Paediatric Diseases Nicole Bozzi Cionci, Loredana Baffoni, Francesca Gaggìa and Diana Di Gioia * Department of Agricultural and Food Sciences (DISTAL), Alma Mater Studiorum—Università di Bologna, Viale Fanin 42, 40127 Bologna, Italy; [email protected] (N.B.C.); [email protected] (L.B.); [email protected] (F.G.) * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +39-051-209-6269 Received: 15 October 2018; Accepted: 8 November 2018; Published: 10 November 2018 Abstract: The human intestinal microbiota, establishing a symbiotic relationship with the host, plays a significant role for human health. It is also well known that a disease status is frequently characterized by a dysbiotic condition of the gut microbiota. A probiotic treatment can represent an alternative therapy for enteric disorders and human pathologies not apparently linked to the gastrointestinal tract. Among bifidobacteria, strains of the species Bifidobacterium breve are widely used in paediatrics. B. breve is the dominant species in the gut of breast-fed infants and it has also been isolated from human milk. It has antimicrobial activity against human pathogens, it does not possess transmissible antibiotic resistance traits, it is not cytotoxic and it has immuno-stimulating abilities. This review describes the applications of B. breve strains mainly for the prevention/treatment of paediatric pathologies. The target pathologies range from widespread gut diseases, including diarrhoea and infant colics, to celiac disease, obesity, allergic and neurological disorders. Moreover, B. breve strains are used for the prevention of side infections in preterm newborns and during antibiotic treatments or chemotherapy.
    [Show full text]
  • Microbiota Supplementation with Bifidobacterium and Lactobacillus Modifies The
    bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/698092; this version posted October 4, 2019. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission. Microbiota supplementation with Bifidobacterium and Lactobacillus modifies the preterm infant gut microbiota and metabolome Cristina Alcon-Giner1#, Matthew J. Dalby1#, Shabhonam Caim1, Jennifer Ketskemety1, Alex Shaw2, Kathleen Sim2, Melissa Lawson1, Raymond Kiu1, Charlotte Leclaire1, Lisa Chalklen1, Magdalena Kujawska1, Suparna Mitra1,3, Fahmina Fardus-Reid4, Gustav Belteki5, Katherine McColl6, Jonathan R. Swann4, J. Simon Kroll2, Paul Clarke6,7, Lindsay J. Hall1*. 1 Quadram Institute Bioscience, Norwich Research Park, Norwich, UK 2 Department of Medicine, Section of Pediatrics, Imperial College London, London, UK 3 Leeds Institute of Medical Research, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK 4 Department of Surgery and Cancer, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, UK 5 Neonatal Intensive Care Unit, The Rosie Hospital, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK 6 Neonatal Intensive Care Unit, Norfolk and Norwich University Hospital, Norwich, UK 7 Norwich Medical School, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK #Joint first author * Corresponding author 1 bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/698092; this version posted October 4, 2019. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission. Abstract Supplementation with members of the early-life microbiota or ‘probiotics’ is becoming increasingly popular to attempt to beneficially manipulate the preterm gut microbiota. We performed a large longitudinal study comprising two preterm groups; 101 orally supplemented with Bifidobacterium and Lactobacillus (Bif/Lacto) and 133 non-supplemented (Control) matched by age, sex, birth-mode, and diet.
    [Show full text]