The Machine and Its Discontents: a Fredy Perlman Anthology

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Machine and Its Discontents: a Fredy Perlman Anthology the machine and its discontents A Fredy Perlman Anthology the MACHINE And its discontents A Fredy Perlman Anthology edited and introduced by darren poynton THEORY AND PRACTICE ACTIVE DISTRIBUTION 2018 Theory and Practice and Active Distribution www.theoryandpractice.org.uk www.activedistribution.org Paperback ISBN: 978-0-9956609-7-7 Hardback ISBN: 978-0-9956609-8-4 With thanks to Lorraine Perlman Photo montages by Fredy Perlman: Page 10: A Modern Ziggurat. Page 78: The Old Regime. Page 140: Untitled. Page 192: Leader, Cadre, Liberated Masses. Page 228: Untitled Contents Introduction 7 Part One: Worker-Student Uprisings Anything Can Happen 12 Worker-Student Action Committees [Excerpt 2! "irth o# a Revo&utionary Movement in (ugos&avia )) Part Two: Critique of Political Economy *e Reproduction o# Dai&y ii#e -. Essay on Commodity Fetishism 1.2 Part Tree: Critique of Leaders 0en Theses on the Pro&i#eration o# Egocrats 122 *e Sei3ure o# State Po4er [Excerpts 12- Part Four: Critique of #ationalism *e Continuing Appea& o# 5ationa&ism 162 Part Fi$e: Critique of ‘Progress& Progress and Nuc&ear Po4er 2!. "i7&iography 2!- Index 22) Introduction – The only -ist name I respond to is “cellist.” Of the generation that came of age through the turbulent events of 1968, Fredy Perlman is certainly an individual that shines brightly. Perlman’s journey into radical politics began in Los Angeles in the summer of 1953 when, at the age of 19, he began working at the Daily Bruin – the student newspaper of the University of California. At the time Senator McCarthy’s anti-communist ‘Red Scare’ was in full swing and its repression was focussing on the circles in which Perlman moved. The paper’s pro civil liberties outlook, that ridiculed the para- noia of the era and gave a voice to those persecuted by the state, caused it to be out of favour with the authorities. The establishment press mounted a smear campaign against the Daily Bruin, claiming that under its influence the university had become a “little red school- house”. In December 1954 new regulations were imposed on the newspaper. All five editors and the majority of their co-workers promptly resigned. Perlman and other former staf tried to set up an alternative paper, though in the end economic pressures led to the closure of the project afer only a few issues. None of the Daily Bruin editors had been working on behalf of any radical party or ideology, in fact they had divergent political views but all were committed to serious journalism and were not easily intimidated by the authorities. The experience led Perlman to hold a permanent suspicion against institutional authority and those who upheld it. In 1963 Fredy Perlman and his wife Lorraine lef America and headed to Europe. Perlman applied for a student visa in the country of his birth, Czechoslovakia (which he had fled as a young child with his parents in 1938 ahead of the Nazi invasion), but his application was rejected. He studied at Belgrade University until 1966 where he received a PhD for a dissertation focussing on Kosovo which was entitled, Conditions for the Development of a Backward Region. In May ‘68 afer lecturing in Turin, Italy, Perlman caught a train to Paris arriving just before the railways were shut down by a strike-wave that was sweeping the country. The experiences of the following weeks would have a deep efect on his subsequent views and would remain a benchmark whenever he considered the potentials of social move- ments in the future. Perlman participated in a student-worker action committee at the Sorbonne, which had been occupied by its students. They held discussions and attempted to form links and communicate with the auto workers who worked and lived in the suburbs of Paris. Oficial union bureaucrats were not open to the possibility of ‘their’ strike being taken away from them, and as the more radical perspect- ives coming from the committees could not be co-opted into the usual demands around pay and conditions they tried to isolate the striking factory workers from the ideas that the activists were disseminating. Factory gates were kept locked and union oficials attempted to mediate all communication with the workers on the inside. On one occasion, Perlman and a group of activists were arrested for tres- passing afer they had climbed the gates of a suburban factory. In court, Perlman declared that he was an American professor and that the action was part of his research on French labour unions. Though no doubt skeptical, the judge dropped the charges. It was during these intense event filled weeks that Perlman came across ideas and histories that would influence him over the following decade: the polit- ical critiques of the Situationist International, anarchism and the history of the Spanish Revolution, and the council communists. Returning to the US, he began the publishing project Black & Red. Initially operating out of Kalamazoo, Michigan, it’s first publications were in the form of a periodical which ran for six and a half issues. In 1969 the project moved to Detroit and took part in the establishment of a printing co-op that would print further Black & Red titles as well as numerous other pamphlets and books for other community and radical 8 Introduction groups. As a part of Black & Red, Perlman was responsible for co-trans- lating and making available to an English speaking audience many important texts of the lef-libertarian movement including Guy Debord’s The Society of the Spectacle, Voline’s The Unknown Revolution, Jacques Camatte’s The Wandering of Humanity, I.I. Rubin’s Essays on Marx’s Theory of Value, and Jean Barrot & Francois Martin’s The Eclipse and Re-emergence of the Communist Movement. As time went on the fading hopes from ‘68 that ‘anything can happen’, coupled with a rising concern with plight of the environment, led to Perlman to drif away from his earlier positions and to become more concerned with questioning the Western notions of ‘civilisation’ and ‘progress’. It is these later writings for which he is probably best known, his book Against His-story, Against Leviathan! remains highly influential in anarchist-primitivist circles. How well his writings from this later period sit with those from his earlier life will be lef for the reader to decide. However, as Ken Knabb, English language translator of the texts of the Situationist International, has perceptively noted – perhaps Perlman pre-emptively provided a self-critique in an earlier book he had written about his former teacher C. Wright Mills, The Inco- herence of the Intellectual: Yet even though Mills rejects the passivity with which men accept their own fragmentation, he no longer strug- gles against it. The coherent self-determined man becomes an exotic creature who lived in a distant past and in extremely diferent material circumstances . The main drif is no longer the program of the right which can be opposed by the program of the lef; it is now an exter- nal spectacle which follows its course like a disease . The rif between theory and practice, thought and action, widens; political ideals can no longer be trans- lated into practical projects. On July 26th 1985 Perlman underwent heart surgery for a condition he had developed in his childhood. His was unable to recover from the operation and passed away in hospital at the age of 50. Up to the time of his death he had continued working on projects for Black & Red. 9 Part One: Worker-Student Uprisings Anything Can Happen This text was published in issue one of Black & Red. It illustrates Perlman’s hopes and aspirations of the time. 8"e $ealists9 +emand the Impossi7&e:; *is s&ogan9 de%e&oped in 'ay 7y re%olutionaries in France9 <ies in the #ace o# common sense9 especial&y the 8common sense; of American corporate-mi&itary propaganda. What happened in 'ay also <ies in the #ace of ofcial American 8common sense=; In #act9 in terms o# American 8common sense9; much o# 4hat happens in the 4or&d e%ery day is impossi7&e= It can?t happen= I# it does happen9 then the ofcial 8common sense; is nonsense@ it is a set of myths and #antasies= "ut hoe can common sense 7e nonsense? *at?s impossi7&e= 0o demonstrate that anything is possi7&e9 this essay 4i&& p&ace some of the myths alongside some of the e%ents= *e essay 4i&& then try to Bnd out 4hy some of the myths are possi7&e9 in other 4ords9 it 4i&& exp&ore the 8scientiBc 7asis; of the myths= *e essay9 i# success#u&9 4i&& thus shoe that anything is possi7&e@ it?s e%en possi7&e #or a popu&ation to take myths #or common sense9 and it?s possi7&e #or mythmakers to con%ince themse&%es o# the reality of their myths in the #ace o# reality itse&#= American “Common Sense” C It?s impossi7&e #or peop&e to run their o4n &i%esD that?s 4hy they don?t have the poeer to do so. 1eop&e are poeer&ess 7ecause they have neither the a7i&ity nor the desire to control and decide about the social and material conditions in 4hich they &i%e= C 1eop&e on&y 4ant po4er and pri%i&eges over each other= It 4ou&d 7e impossi7&e9 #or examp&e9 #or uni%ersity students to Bght against the institution 4hich assures them a pri%i&eged position= *ose students 4ho study do so to get high grades9 7ecause 4ith the high grades they can get high-paying Eobs9 4hich means the abi&ity to manage and manipu&ate other peop&e9 and the a7i&ity to 7uy more consumer goods than other peop&e= I# &earning 4ere not re4arded 4ith high grades9 high pay, po4er over others and &ots o# goods9 no one 4ou&d &earnD there?d 7e no moti%ation #or &earning= C It 4ou&d 7e Eust as impossi7&e #or 4orkers to 4ant to run their #actories9 to 4ant to decide about their production= A&& that 4orkers are interested in is 4ages@ they Eust 4ant more 4ages than others have9 so as to 7uy 7igger houses9 more cars and &onger trips= C E%en i# students9 4orkers9 #armers 4anted something diFerent9 they’re ob%ious&y satisBed 4ith 4hat they’re doing9 other4ise they 4ou&dn?t 7e doing it= C In any case9 those 4ho aren?t satisBed can #ree&y express their dissatis#action 7y 7uying and 7y %oting@ they don?t have to 7uy the things they don?t &ike9 and they don?t have to %ote #or the candidates they don?t &ike= It?s impossi7&e #or them to change their situation any other 4ay.
Recommended publications
  • Against His-Story, Against Leviathan
    Against His-story, Against Leviathan Fredy Perlman 1983 1 Contents 1 4 2 13 3 23 4 35 5 44 6 51 7 55 8 59 9 66 10 72 11 79 12 85 13 89 14 97 15 108 16 115 17 124 18 133 19 140 20 153 21 162 2 22 171 23 179 24 190 3 1 And we are here as on a darkling plain Swept with confused alarms of struggle and flight Where ignorant armies clash by night. (M. Arnold) Here one can neither stand nor lie nor sit There is not even silence in the mountains But dry sterile thunder without rain… (T.S. Eliot) The darkling plain is here. This is the waste land: England, America, Russia, China, Israel, France… And we are here as victims, or as spectators, or as perpetrators of tortures, massacres, poisonings, manipulations, despoliations. Hic Rhodus! This is the place to jump, the place to dance! This is the wilderness! Was thereeverany other? This is savagery! Do you call it freedom? This is barbarism! The struggle for survival isright here. Haven’t we always known it? Isn’t this a public secret? Hasn’t it always been the big public secret? It remains a secret. It is publicly known but not avowed. Publicly the wilderness is elsewhere, bar- barism is abroad, savagery is on the face of the other. The dry sterile thunder without rain, the con- fused alarms of struggle and flight, are projected outward, into the great unknown, across the seas and over the mountains. We’re on the side with the angels.
    [Show full text]
  • Practical Anarchism: the Makhnovist Movement in the Ukraine, 1917Â
    Phi Alpha Theta Pacific Northwest Conference, 8–10 April 2021 Zion G. Flores, Eastern Washington University, undergraduate student, “Practical Anarchism: The Makhnovist Movement in the Ukraine, 1917–1921” Abstract: Anarchism was one of the most prominent revolutionary left-wing movements in 19th and 20th century Europe, even contending as a philosophy with Marxism in many socialist circles. However, anarchism is generally believed today to be unrealistic and impractical as a political ideology. When looking at the modern historical record though, this does not always seem to be the case. I plan to explore whether the Makhnovist movement in the Ukraine from 1917-1921 provides an exception to the idea that anarchist movements are never viable. This movement, guided in large part by anarcho-communist Nestor Makhno, was one of the first to take modern anarchism from theory into practice. Although its existence was brief and its ability to fully realize anarchist ideals was limited by the circumstances of the time, the question must be asked: does the Makhnovist movement serve as an example of practical anarchism? Practical Anarchism The Makhnovist Movement in the Ukraine, 1917-1921 Zion G. Flores Eastern Washington University [email protected] Undergraduate 1 On March 2, 1917, Nestor Makhno took his first steps outside the Butyrki Prison of Moscow in over eight years. As Russia was being delivered from the chains of Tsardom, so too was Makhno delivered from his imprisonment as a part of the emancipation of prisoners during the February Revolution.1 His body emerged weak and weary from the debilitating conditions of his imprisonment.2 His commitment to anarchism, his rebellious spirit, and his fervor to emancipate toiling people from “slavery under the yoke of State and Capital” however had only grown stronger despite the seemingly hopeless prospects.
    [Show full text]
  • SOCIAL ANARCHISM OR LIFESTYLE ANARCHISM Murray 'Bookchin
    SOCIAL ANARCHISM OR LIFESTYLE ANARCHISM AN UNB.RIDGEABLE CHASM Murray 'Bookchin AK PRESS © Copyright: 1995 Murray Bookchin Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Bookchin,Murray, 1921- Social anarchism or lifestyle anarchism : the unbridgeable chasm / byMurray Bookchin. p. cm. Includes bibliographical references. ISBN 1-873176-83-X (pbk.) 1. Anarchism. 2. Social problems. 3. Individualism. 4. Personalism. HX833.B635 1995 320.5'7-dc20 95-41903 CIP British Library Cataloguing in Publication Data A catalogue record for this title is available fromthe British Library . First published in 1995 by AK Press AK Press 22 Lutton Place P.O. Box 40682 Edinburgh, Scotland San Francisco, CA EH8 9PE 94140-0682 The publication of this volume was in part made possible by the generosity of Stefan Andreas Store, Chris Atton, Andy Hibbs, Stephen JohnAd ams, and the Friends of AK Press. Typeset and design donated by Freddie Baer. CONTENTS A Short Note to the Reader .......................................................... 1 Social Anarchism or Lifestyle Anarchism ................................. 4 The Left That Was: A Personal Reflection................................... ............................... 66 A NOTE TO THE READER This short work was written to deal with the fact that anarchism stands at a turning point in its long and turbulent history. At a time when popular distrust of the state has reached extraordinary proportions in many countries; when thedivision of society among a handful of opulently wealthy individuals and corporations contrasts sharply with the growing impover­ ishment of millions of people on a scale unprecedentedsince the Great Depression decade; when the intensity of exploitation has forced people in growing numbers to accept a work week of a length typical of the last century - anarchists have formed neither a coherent program nor a revolutionary organizationto provide a direction for the mass discontent that contemporary society is creating.
    [Show full text]
  • New Political Science Anarchism Revived
    This article was downloaded by: [Memorial University of Newfoundland] On: 01 August 2014, At: 13:39 Publisher: Routledge Informa Ltd Registered in England and Wales Registered Number: 1072954 Registered office: Mortimer House, 37-41 Mortimer Street, London W1T 3JH, UK New Political Science Publication details, including instructions for authors and subscription information: http://www.tandfonline.com/loi/cnps20 Anarchism Revived Leonard Williams a a Manchester College Published online: 22 Aug 2007. To cite this article: Leonard Williams (2007) Anarchism Revived, New Political Science, 29:3, 297-312, DOI: 10.1080/07393140701510160 To link to this article: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/07393140701510160 PLEASE SCROLL DOWN FOR ARTICLE Taylor & Francis makes every effort to ensure the accuracy of all the information (the “Content”) contained in the publications on our platform. However, Taylor & Francis, our agents, and our licensors make no representations or warranties whatsoever as to the accuracy, completeness, or suitability for any purpose of the Content. Any opinions and views expressed in this publication are the opinions and views of the authors, and are not the views of or endorsed by Taylor & Francis. The accuracy of the Content should not be relied upon and should be independently verified with primary sources of information. Taylor and Francis shall not be liable for any losses, actions, claims, proceedings, demands, costs, expenses, damages, and other liabilities whatsoever or howsoever caused arising directly or indirectly in connection with, in relation to or arising out of the use of the Content. This article may be used for research, teaching, and private study purposes. Any substantial or systematic reproduction, redistribution, reselling, loan, sub-licensing, systematic supply, or distribution in any form to anyone is expressly forbidden.
    [Show full text]
  • Against Leviathan! by Fredy Perlman
    Ozimandias — Review: Against His-story! Against Leviathan! by Fredy Perlman RB 1991 Contents Rock of Stages ................................ 3 Stage Fright .................................. 5 Fredy vs. Fred ................................ 5 2 Review: Against His-story! Against Leviathan! by Fredy Perlman, Black & Red, Detroit 1983. Against His-story! is an attempt to take opposition to Progress to its logical con- clusion. So is this belated review. Perlman summarises the whole history of Civilisation from the viewpoint of its victims: we, the “zeks”, free people who were enslaved then taught to identify with the enslaving monster: Leviathan. Rock of Stages Civilisation, the antithesis of community, is only 5,000 years old. Communities existed in the New World for thousands of years without either “giving rise to” or becoming part of, the Civilisations of the Aztecs and Incas, which shrank. Civilisa- tions did not arise inevitably because of the development of the productive forces. People have always tried to fight Civilization. So why did it arise, how did it spread and dominate the world, and why didn’t communities stop it? The minority which created Civilisation did so initially, not in a place where the productive forces were rich, but where they were poor, and where Nature was harsh: Mesopotamia. The Sumerians had to build waterworks, so expertise and eventually kings developed. When the waterworks of Lagash overflowed into those of Ur, the king of Ur, or Lugal, persuaded his people to attack Lagash, and basically ended up enslaving its inhabitants and forcing them to rebuild both sets of waterworks, by now a full-time activity. Communities try to resist Civilisation in various ways.
    [Show full text]
  • Technology Is Capital: Fifth Estate's Critique of the Megamachine
    4 Steve Millett Technology is capital: Fifth Estate’s critique of the megamachine Introduction ‘How do we begin to discuss something as immense as technology?’, writes T. Fulano at the beginning of his essay ‘Against the megamachine’ (1981a: 4). Indeed, the degree to which the technological apparatus penetrates all elements of contemporary society does make such an undertaking a daunting one. Nevertheless, it is an undertaking that the US journal and collective Fifth Estate has attempted. In so doing, it has developed arguably the most sophisticated and challenging anarchist approach to technology currently available.1 Starting from the late 1970s, the Fifth Estate (hereafter FE) began to put forward the argument that the technologies of capitalism cannot be separated from the socioeconomic system itself. Inspired and influenced by a number of writers, including Karl Marx, Jacques Ellul and Jacques Camatte, it began to conceptualise modern technology as constituting a system of domination itself, one which interlinks and interacts with the economic processes of capitalism to create a new social form, a ‘megamachine’ which integrates not only capitalism and technology, but also State, bureaucracy and military. For the FE, technology and capital, although not identical, are more similar than different, and cannot be separated into an ‘evil’ capitalism and an essentially neutral technology. Any critique of capitalism and the State must recognise the importance of contem- porary technology and the crucial role it plays in the development of new forms of domination, oppression and exploitation. Concepts of ‘capital’ and ‘mega- machine’ are also explored later in this chapter. The Fifth Estate The FE began in Detroit in 1965, started by seventeen-year-old high-school student Harvey Ovshinsky.
    [Show full text]
  • Against Leviathan! by Fredy Perlman
    Library.Anarhija.Net Ozimandias — Review: Against His-story! Against Leviathan! by Fredy Perlman RB RB Ozimandias — Review: Against His-story! Against Leviathan! by Fredy Perlman 1991 Retrieved on Febuary 1, 2010 from libcom.org from Wildcat (UK) lib.anarhija.net 1991 Contents Rock of Stages ........................ 3 Stage Fright .......................... 6 Fredy vs. Fred ........................ 7 2 Review: Against His-story! Against Leviathan! by Fredy Perlman, Black & Red, Detroit 1983. Against His-story! is an attempt to take opposition to Progress to its logical conclusion. So is this belated review. Perlman summarises the whole history of Civilisation from the viewpoint of its victims: we, the “zeks”, free people who were enslaved then taught to identify with the enslaving monster: Leviathan. Rock of Stages Civilisation, the antithesis of community, is only 5,000 years old. Communities existed in the New World for thousands of years with- out either “giving rise to” or becoming part of, the Civilisations of the Aztecs and Incas, which shrank. Civilisations did not arise in- evitably because of the development of the productive forces. Peo- ple have always tried to fight Civilization. So why did it arise, how did it spread and dominate the world, and why didn’t communities stop it? The minority which created Civilisation did so initially, notina place where the productive forces were rich, but where they were poor, and where Nature was harsh: Mesopotamia. The Sumerians had to build waterworks, so expertise and eventually kings devel- oped. When the waterworks of Lagash overflowed into those of Ur, the king of Ur, or Lugal, persuaded his people to attack Lagash, and basically ended up enslaving its inhabitants and forcing them to rebuild both sets of waterworks, by now a full-time activity.
    [Show full text]
  • A Primitivist Primer
    John Moore A Primitivist Primer The Anarchist Library Contents Author’s note ............................. 3 What is anarcho-primitivism? ................... 3 How does anarcho-primitivism differ from anarchism, or other radical ideologies?........................... 4 Where, according to anarcho-primitivism, does power origi- nate? .................................. 5 How does anarcho-primitivism view technology?........ 5 What about population?....................... 7 How might an anarcho-primitivist future be brought about?. 7 How can I find out more about anarcho-primitivism?..... 8 2 Author’s note This is not a definitive statement, merely a personal account, and seeks in general terms to explain what is meant by anarcho-primitivism. It does not wish to limit or exclude, but provide a general introduction to the topic. Apologies for inaccuracies, misinterpretations, or (inevitable) overgeneralizations. What is anarcho-primitivism? Anarcho-primitivism (a.k.a. radical primitivism, anti-authoritarian primitivism, the anti-civilization movement, or just, primitivism) is a shorthand term for a radical current that critiques the totality of civilization from an anarchist per- spective, and seeks to initiate a comprehensive transformation of human life. Strictly speaking, there is no such thing as anarcho-primitivism or anarcho- primitivists. Fredy Perlman, a major voice in this current, once said, “The only -ist name I respond to is ‘cellist’.” Individuals associated with this current do not wish to be adherents of an ideology, merely people who seek to become free indi- viduals in free communities in harmony with one another and with the biosphere, and may therefore refuse to be limited by the term ‘anarcho-primitivist’ or any other ideological tagging. At best, then, anarcho-primitivism is a convenient label used to characterise diverse individuals with a common project: the abo- lition of all power relations — e.g., structures of control, coercion, domination, and exploitation — and the creation of a form of community that excludes all such relations.
    [Show full text]
  • John P. Clark Papers 9 Boxes, 3.25 Linear Feet Special Collections
    John P. Clark Papers 9 boxes, 3.25 linear feet Special Collections & Archives J. Edgar & Louise S. Monroe Library Loyola University New Orleans Collection 57 John P. Clark Papers Reference Code Collection 57 Name and Location of Repository Special Collections and Archives, J. Edgar & Louise S. Monroe Library, Loyola University New Orleans Title John P. Clark Papers Date 1964 – 2008, bulk 1970 – 2000 Extent 9 boxes, 3.25 linear feet Name of Creator Clark, John P. Administrative/Biographical History John P. Clark was born on August 21, 1945 in New Orleans, Louisiana. He attended Tulane University as an undergraduate and graduate student, receiving Bachelor’s in Philosophy and Political Science in 1967, a Master’s in Philosophy in 1971, and a Doctorate in Philosophy in 1974. He has served as a lecturer, assistant professor, associate professor, and professor of philosophy at Loyola University New Orleans since 1970, and has additionally served as a lecturer at Tulane University, St. Mary’s Dominican College, and Goddard College between the years of 1968 and 1993. Clark has received the Dux Academicus Award, Pax Christi New Orleans Bread and Roses Award, Anthony Waters Distinguished Teaching Award, and City College Faculty Award for Excellence in Scholarship. He is active in the Green Movement and other political and philosophical movements whose goals involve grassroots democracy, world peace, social justice, and ecological sustainability. He has authored and edited numerous books, including “Max Stirner’s Egoism”, “The Philosophical Anarchism of William Godwin”, “The Anarchist Moment: Reflections on Culture, Nature and Power”, “Renewing the Earth: The Promise of Social Ecology”, and “The Impossible Community: Realizing Communitarian Anarchism”.
    [Show full text]
  • Changing Anarchism.Pdf
    Changing anarchism Changing anarchism Anarchist theory and practice in a global age edited by Jonathan Purkis and James Bowen Manchester University Press Manchester and New York distributed exclusively in the USA by Palgrave Copyright © Manchester University Press 2004 While copyright in the volume as a whole is vested in Manchester University Press, copyright in individual chapters belongs to their respective authors. This electronic version has been made freely available under a Creative Commons (CC-BY-NC- ND) licence, which permits non-commercial use, distribution and reproduction provided the author(s) and Manchester University Press are fully cited and no modifications or adaptations are made. Details of the licence can be viewed at https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ Published by Manchester University Press Oxford Road, Manchester M13 9NR, UK and Room 400, 175 Fifth Avenue, New York, NY 10010, USA www.manchesteruniversitypress.co.uk British Library Cataloguing-in-Publication Data A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data applied for ISBN 0 7190 6694 8 hardback First published 2004 13 12 11 10 09 08 07 06 05 04 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 Typeset in Sabon with Gill Sans display by Servis Filmsetting Ltd, Manchester Printed in Great Britain by CPI, Bath Dedicated to the memory of John Moore, who died suddenly while this book was in production. His lively, innovative and pioneering contributions to anarchist theory and practice will be greatly missed.
    [Show full text]
  • Black Rose 2 Spring 1975
    V oltairine DeCleyre: An Introduction to American Left-Wing Anarchism Marian Leighton BLACK ROSE 2 The history of American radicalism requires much further Spring 1975 in-depth exploration. This is particularly true of the American anarchist tradition. Ask an anarchist of today who he-she 1 Voltairine DeCleyre: An IntroduetloD to Amerieaa claims as radical intellectual forebears and, depending upon if Left-WiIlg Aaarchism he-she is of the left-wing or right-wing, they will reply by Marian Leighton Bakunin-Emma Goldman-Kropotkin or Benjamin Tucker-Jos­ iah Warren-Lysander Spooner, respectively. 8 The Making of an Anarebist by Voltairine DeCleyre \ ~ Interestingly, that 16 "Only in the Dual Realm" I this reply would lead one to believe i right-wing anarchism is more indigenous a part of the American poem by George Therese Dickenson i' 18 Terrorism or Revolution radical experience than left·wing anarchism which, based on the by Raoul Vaneigem work of Bakunin, Goldman, Kropotkin, Berkman would seem more rooted in the nineteenth century European urban insurrec­ 41 Autopsy of an Occupation: Post Mortem Critique of the LIP by John Hess tionary tradition. Is this in any way a fair distinction? Is it at that the left-wing anarchist tradition intellectually 55 Time Payments: Regular or Revolving all significant ··the heart lesson seems to rely so heavily upon an imported radicalism that -double image largely grew out of a European background? Ifthis is true, does a novel of short stories by Marie Nares it matter in any way? Of course, it also remains to be seen just how much more "American" the right-wing or laissez-faire 64 Interview with Esther and Sam Dolgoff by Doug Richardson anarchist tradition is.
    [Show full text]
  • “For a World Without Oppressors:” U.S. Anarchism from the Palmer
    “For a World Without Oppressors:” U.S. Anarchism from the Palmer Raids to the Sixties by Andrew Cornell A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Department of Social and Cultural Analysis Program in American Studies New York University January, 2011 _______________________ Andrew Ross © Andrew Cornell All Rights Reserved, 2011 “I am undertaking something which may turn out to be a resume of the English speaking anarchist movement in America and I am appalled at the little I know about it after my twenty years of association with anarchists both here and abroad.” -W.S. Van Valkenburgh, Letter to Agnes Inglis, 1932 “The difficulty in finding perspective is related to the general American lack of a historical consciousness…Many young white activists still act as though they have nothing to learn from their sisters and brothers who struggled before them.” -George Lakey, Strategy for a Living Revolution, 1971 “From the start, anarchism was an open political philosophy, always transforming itself in theory and practice…Yet when people are introduced to anarchism today, that openness, combined with a cultural propensity to forget the past, can make it seem a recent invention—without an elastic tradition, filled with debates, lessons, and experiments to build on.” -Cindy Milstein, Anarchism and Its Aspirations, 2010 “Librarians have an ‘academic’ sense, and can’t bare to throw anything away! Even things they don’t approve of. They acquire a historic sense. At the time a hand-bill may be very ‘bad’! But the following day it becomes ‘historic.’” -Agnes Inglis, Letter to Highlander Folk School, 1944 “To keep on repeating the same attempts without an intelligent appraisal of all the numerous failures in the past is not to uphold the right to experiment, but to insist upon one’s right to escape the hard facts of social struggle into the world of wishful belief.
    [Show full text]