DOCSLIB.ORG

Stephens Amicus Brief

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

No. 18-107 IN THE Supreme Court of the United States ___________ R.G. & G.R. HARRIS FUNERAL HOMES, INC., Petitioner, v. EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION and AIMEE STEPHENS, Respondents. ___________ On Writ of Certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit ___________ AMICI CURIAE BRIEF OF SCHOLARS WHO STUDY THE TRANSGENDER POPULATION IN SUPPORT OF RESPONDENT AIMEE STEPHENS ___________ ADAM P. ROMERO DAVID R. CARPENTER * THE WILLIAMS INSTITUTE ANDREW B. TALAI UCLA SCHOOL OF LAW MOHINDRA RUPRAM 395 Charles E. Young Dr. E. SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP Los Angeles, CA 90095 555 West Fifth Street, (310) 267-4382 Suite 4000 Los Angeles, CA 90013 JAIMIE K. MCFARLIN (213) 896-6000 ETHAN PLAIL [email protected] SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP 1051 K Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20005 (202) 736-8000 Counsel for Amici Curiae July 3, 2019 * Counsel of Record TABLE OF CONTENTS Page TABLE OF AUTHORITIES ................................. iii INTEREST OF AMICI CURIAE .......................... 1 INTRODUCTION AND SUMMARY OF THE ARGUMENT ...................................................... 2 BACKGROUND .................................................... 4 A. A Guide To The Terminology ................... 5 B. The Demographics And Diversity Of The Transgender Population ........................... 8 C. Discrimination In The Workplace ............ 10 ARGUMENT ......................................................... 14 I. DISCRIMINATION BECAUSE OF TRANSGENDER STATUS, IDENTITY, OR EXPRESSION IS A FORM OF DISCRIMI- NATION BECAUSE OF SEX UNDER TI- TLE VII .......................................................... 14 II. THE DISCRIMINATION AT ISSUE HERE IS A COMPARABLE EVIL TO OTHER FORMS OF SEX DISCRIMINATION PROHIBITED BY TITLE VII ....................... 18 A. Employment Discrimination Has Nega- tive Effects On Transgender Employees And Harms Employers As A Whole ......... 19 B. The Effects Of Workplace Discrimination Compound And Are Compounded By The Discrimination Transgender People Face In Other Areas Of Life .............................. 25 (i) ii TABLE OF CONTENTS—continued Page III. PUBLIC OPINION CONFIRMS THAT TI- TLE VII SHOULD BE UNDERSTOOD TO PROHIBIT DISCRIMINATION AGAINST TRANSGENDER PEOPLE ........................... 31 CONCLUSION ..................................................... 34 APPENDIX: List of Amici Curiae ....................... 1a iii TABLE OF AUTHORITIES CASES Page Adkins v. City of New York, 143 F. Supp. 3d 134 (S.D.N.Y. 2015) .................................... 21, 29 Baskin v. Bogan, 766 F.3d 648 (7th Cir. 2014) ........................................................... 1 Bd. of Educ. v. U.S. Dep’t of Educ., 208 F. Supp. 3d 850 (S.D. Ohio 2016) ................... 26 Campaign for S. Equality v. Bryant, 64 F. Supp. 3d 906 (S.D. Miss. 2014), aff’d, 791 F.3d 625 (5th Cir. 2015) ............................. 1 DeBoer v. Snyder, 973 F. Supp. 2d 757 (E.D. Mich. 2014), rev’d, 772 F.3d 388 (6th Cir. 2014), rev’d sub nom. Obergefell v. Hodg- es, 135 S. Ct. 2584 (2015) ........................... 1 Doe v. McConn, 489 F. Supp. 76 (S.D. Tex. 1980) ........................................................... 29 Glenn v. Brumby, 663 F.3d 1312 (11th Cir. 2011) ........................................................... 18 Meritor Savings Bank, FSB v. Vinson, 477 U.S. 57 (1986) ............................................. 16 Obergefell v. Hodges, 135 S. Ct. 2584 (2015) .......................................................... 1 Oncale v. Sundowner Offshore Servs., Inc., 523 U.S. 75 (1998) ...................................... 4, 31 People v. Archibald, 296 N.Y.S.2d 834 (Sup. Ct. App. Term 1968), aff’d, 260 N.E.2d 871 (N.Y. 1970) ........................................... 29 Phillips v. Martin Marietta Corp., 400 U.S. 542 (1971) ................................................... 8, 16 Price Waterhouse v. Hopkins, 490 U.S. 228 (1989), superseded by statute on other grounds, Civil Rights Act of 1991, Pub. L. No. 102-166, 105 Stat. 1072, as recognized in Landgraf v. USI Film Prods., 511 U.S. 244 (1994) ....................................... 3, 16, 19, 31 iv TABLE OF AUTHORITIES—continued Page Schroer v. Billington, 577 F. Supp. 2d 293 (D.D.C. 2008) .............................................. 33 Whitaker ex rel. Whitaker v. Kenosha Uni- fied Sch. Dist. No. 1, 858 F.3d 1034 (7th Cir. 2017), cert. dismissed, 138 S. Ct. 1260 (2018) ................................................. 26 STATUTES 29 U.S.C. § 206(d)(1) ..................................... 18 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-2(a)(1) .............................. 2, 31 SCHOLARLY AUTHORITIES Am. Psychol. Ass’n, Guidelines for Psycho- logical Practice with Transgender and Gender Nonconforming People, 70 Am. Psychol. 832 (2015) ............................ 5, 6, 7, 17 Kevin M. Barry et al., A Bare Desire to Harm: Transgender People and the Equal Protection Clause, 57 B.C. L. Rev. 507 (2016) .......................................................... 7 Amanda K. Baumle et al., New Research on Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity Discrimination: Effect of State Policy on Charges Filed at the EEOC, J. Homosex- uality (2019) ............................................. 30, 31 John R. Blosnich et al., Mental Health of Transgender Veterans in US States With and Without Discrimination and Hate Crime Legal Protection, 106 Am. J. Pub. Health 534 (2016) ....................................... 31 v TABLE OF AUTHORITIES—continued Page Walter Bockting et al., Adult Development and Quality of Life of Transgender and Gender Nonconforming People, 23 Cur- rent Opinion Endocrinology, Diabetes & Obesity 188 (2016) ..................................... 7 Walter O. Bockting et al., Stigma, Mental Health, and Resilience in an Online Sample of the US Transgender Popula- tion, 103 Am. J. Pub. Health 943 (2013) ............................................. 14, 17, 21, 22 Michelle Dietert & Dianne Dentice, Gender Identity Issues and Workplace Discrimi- nation: The Transgender Experience, 14 J. Workplace Rts. 121 (2009) ......................... 17 Michael L. Hendricks & Rylan J. Testa, A Conceptual Framework for Clinical Work with Transgender and Gender Noncon- forming Clients: An Adaptation of the Mi- nority Stress Model, 43 Prof. Psychol. 460 (2012) .......................................................... 5 Sylvia Ann Hewlett & Karen Sumberg, For LGBT Workers, Being “Out” Brings Ad- vantages, Harv. Bus. Rev. (July-Aug. 2011), https://hbr.org/2011/07/for-lgbt- workers-being-out-brings-advantages ....... 23 Lauren Mizock & Kim T. Mueser, Employ- ment, Mental Health, Internalized Stig- ma, and Coping With Transphobia Among Transgender Individuals, 1 Psy- chol. Sexual Orientation & Gender Diver- sity 146 (2014) ............................................ 17 vi TABLE OF AUTHORITIES—continued Page Virginia P. Quinn et al., Cohort Profile: Study of Transition, Outcomes and Gen- der (STRONG) to Assess Health Status of Transgender People, 7 BMJ Open 1, no. 12, Dec. 2017, https://bmjopen.bmj.com/ content/bmjopen/7/12/e018121.full.pdf ..... 15 Diane M. Quinn & Valerie A. Earnshaw, Concealable Stigmatized Identities and Psychological Well-Being, 7 Soc. & Per- sonality Psychol. Compass 40 (2013) ........ 22 Adam P. Romero, Does the Equal Pay Act Prohibit Discrimination on the Basis of Sexual Orientation or Gender Identity?, 10 Ala. C.R. & C.L. L. Rev. 35 (2019), http://www.law.ua.edu/acrcl/files/2019/06/ 2.-Romero_Published.pdf ........................... 18 Kristen Schilt & Matthew Wiswall, Before and After: Gender Transitions, Human Capital, and Workplace Experiences, 8 B.E. J. Econ. Analysis & Pol’y 1, no. 1, 2008, http://www.bepress.com/bejeap/ vol8/iss1/art39 ........................................... 12 OTHER AUTHORITIES Am. Psychiatric Ass’n, Diagnostic and Sta- tistical Manual of Mental Disorders (5th ed. 2013) ..................................................... 27 Am. Psychological Ass’n, Answers to Your Questions About Transgender People, Gender Identity, and Gender Expression (copy. 2011, updated 2014), https://www. apa.org/topics/lgbt/transgender.pdf ........... 7 vii TABLE OF AUTHORITIES—continued Page M.V. Lee Badgett et al., Williams Inst., The Business Impact of LGBT-Supportive Workplace Policies (2013), http://williams institute.law.ucla.edu/wp-content/uploads/ Business-Impact-LGBT-Policies-Full-May- 2013.pdf ...................................................... 24 Elisa Bandini & Mario Maggi, Transphobia, in Emotional, Physical and Sexual Abuse: Impact in Children and Social Minorities 49 (Giovanni Corona, Emmanuele A. Jannini & Mario Maggi eds., 2014) ........... 17 Christopher Carpenter et al., Transgender Status, Gender Identity, and Socioeco- nomic Outcomes in the United States (forthcoming 2019) (on file with counsel) ... 13 Kerith J. Conron & Shoshana K. Goldberg, Williams Inst., LGBT Protections from Discrimination: Employment and Public Accommodations (2019), https://williams institute.law.ucla.edu/wp-content/uploads/ NonDiscrimWorkPubAccom.pdf ................ 30 Daniel Cox & Robert P. Jones, Pub. Reli- gion Research Inst., Majority of Ameri- cans Oppose Transgender Bathroom Re- strictions (Mar. 10, 2017), https:// www.prri.org/research/lgbt-transgender- bathroom-discrimination-religious-liberty/ ... 32 viii TABLE OF AUTHORITIES—continued Page Daniel Cox et al., Pub. Religion Research Inst., Who Sees Discrimination? Attitudes on Sexual Orientation, Gender Identity, Race, and Immigration Status: Findings from PRRI’s American Values Atlas (June 21, 2017), https://www.prri.org/research/
Recommended publications
  • LGBT Identity and Crime

    LGBT Identity and Crime

    LGBT Identity and Crime LGBT Identity and Crime* JORDAN BLAIR WOODS** Abstract Recent studies report that LGBT adults and youth dispropor- tionately face hardships that are risk factors for criminal offending and victimization. Some of these factors include higher rates of poverty, over- representation in the youth homeless population, and overrepresentation in the foster care system. Despite these risk factors, there is a lack of study and available data on LGBT people who come into contact with the crim- inal justice system as offenders or as victims. Through an original intellectual history of the treatment of LGBT identity and crime, this Article provides insight into how this problem in LGBT criminal justice developed and examines directions to move beyond it. The history shows that until the mid-1970s, the criminalization of homosexuality left little room to think of LGBT people in the criminal justice system as anything other than deviant sexual offenders. The trend to decriminalize sodomy in the mid-1970s opened a narrow space for schol- ars, advocates, and policymakers to use antidiscrimination principles to redefine LGBT people in the criminal justice system as innocent and non- deviant hate crime victims, as opposed to deviant sexual offenders. Although this paradigm shift has contributed to some important gains for LGBT people, this Article argues that it cannot be celebrated as * Originally published in the California Law Review. ** Assistant Professor of Law, University of Arkansas School of Law, Fayetteville. I am thankful for the helpful suggestions from Samuel Bray, Devon Carbado, Maureen Carroll, Steve Clowney, Beth Colgan, Sharon Dolovich, Will Foster, Brian R.
  • April 19, 2019 the Honorable Suzanne Bonamici Chair

    April 19, 2019 the Honorable Suzanne Bonamici Chair

    The Williams Institute On Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity Law and Public Policy April 19, 2019 The Honorable Suzanne Bonamici Chair, Subcommittee on Civil Rights and Human Services Committee on Education and Labor U.S. House of Representatives The Honorable James Comer Ranking Member, Subcommittee on Civil Rights and Human Services Committee on Education and Labor U.S. House of Representatives CC: The Honorable Bobby Scott Chair, Committee on Education and Labor U.S. House of Representatives Dear Chair Bonamici, Ranking Member Comer, and Members: Thank you for the opportunity to submit written testimony for the legislative record of H.R. 5, the Equality Act. We are writing in our capacity as scholars of the Williams Institute at UCLA School of Law. Founded in 2001, the Williams Institute is dedicated to conducting rigorous, independent research on sexual orientation and gender identity law and public policy. Experts at the Williams Institute have published hundreds of public policy studies and law review articles that have greatly expanded our knowledge about the lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender (LGBT) population in the United States; filed amicus briefs in many court cases involving LGBT rights, which have been cited by the U.S. Supreme Court and other courts; provided expert testimony at legislative hearings and had our research findings cited in legislation and legislative analyses; been widely cited in the national media; and provided educational programs for thousands of judges, legislators, lawyers, and members of the public. The Williams Institute is uniquely positioned as an interdisciplinary research institute of legal and social science scholars who conduct high-quality research in order to improve policymaking and other government functions.
  • March 22, 2021 the Honorable Richard Durbin Chair, Committee on the Judiciary U.S. Senate the Honorable Chuck Grassley Ranking M

    March 22, 2021 the Honorable Richard Durbin Chair, Committee on the Judiciary U.S. Senate the Honorable Chuck Grassley Ranking M

    The Williams Institute On Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity Law and Public Policy March 22, 2021 The Honorable Richard Durbin Chair, Committee on the Judiciary U.S. Senate The Honorable Chuck Grassley Ranking Member, Committee on the Judiciary U.S. Senate Dear Chair Durbin, Ranking Member Grassley, and Members: Thank you for the opportunity to submit written testimony for the legislative record of S. 393/H.R. 5, the Equality Act. We are writing in our capacity as scholars of the Williams Institute at UCLA School of Law. Founded in 2001, the Williams Institute is dedicated to conducting rigorous, independent research on sexual orientation and gender identity law and public policy. Experts at the Williams Institute have published hundreds of public policy studies and journal articles that have expanded knowledge about the lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender (LGBT) population in the United States; filed amicus briefs in many court cases involving LGBT rights, which have been cited by the U.S. Supreme Court and other courts; provided expert testimony at legislative hearings and had our research findings cited in legislation and legislative analyses; been widely cited in the national media; and provided educational programs for thousands of judges, legislators, lawyers, and members of the public. The Williams Institute is uniquely positioned as an interdisciplinary research institute of legal and social science scholars who conduct high-quality research in order to improve policymaking and other government functions. Based on this expertise, in 2009 we submitted a comprehensive report to Congress on employment discrimination against LGBT people as part of the legislative record of H.R.
  • Policy Spotlight: Hate Crime Laws

    Policy Spotlight: Hate Crime Laws

    POLICY SPOTLIGHT: HATE CRIME LAWS JULY 2021 Author Partners Foreword by Judy Shepard This report was authored by: Acknowledgments 2 Movement Advancement Project MAP’s mission is to provide independent and rigorous research, Special Thanks insight, and communications that help speed equality and opportunity for all people. MAP works to ensure that all people have a fair chance to pursue health and happiness, earn a living, take care of the ones they love, be safe in their communities, and participate Special thanks to Dr. Bonnie Washick for her in civic life. For more information, visit www.lgbtmap.org. statutory research and project consultation, and to Lauren Griffin and Andy Ligotti of Alston & Bird for their case study research. Contact Information Movement Advancement Project 1905 15th Street #1097 Additional thanks to: Boulder, CO 80306 Adrian Shanker, Bradbury-Sullivan LGBT Community Center 1-844-MAP-8800 www.lgbtmap.org Audacia Ray, Anti-Violence Project (AVP) Arusha Gordon, Lawyers’ Committee for Civil Rights MAP is very grateful to the following major funders, Under Law whose generous support makes it possible for us Becky Monroe, The Leadership Conference to do our work: Corinne Green, Equality Federation David Bohnett Foundation Dana Juniel, Matthew Shepard Foundation David Dechman & Michel Mercure Delvin Davis, Southern Poverty Law Center Ford Foundation Erin Hustings, Anti-Defamation League (ADL) Gill Foundation Greg Miraglia, Matthew Shepard Foundation Esmond Harmsworth Evelyn & Walter Haas, Jr. Fund Ian Palmquist, Equality Federation Jim Hormel Leo Ferguson, Jews for Racial & Economic Justice Johnson Family Foundation Madihha Ahussain, Muslim Advocates Laughing Gull Foundation Weston Milliken Michael Lieberman, Southern Poverty Law Center Ineke Mushovic Nikki Singh, The Sikh Coalition The Palette Fund Phyllis Gerstenfeld, California State University - Stanislaus Mona Pittenger Puneet Cheema, Legal Defense and Educational Fund (LDF) Ronald W.