A Comparative Study of Local Railway Networks in Poland and the Czech Republic
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
By Railway to the 21St Century” As Key Factor in the Development of Rail Transport in Poland
Available online at www.sciencedirect.com ScienceDirect Transportation Research Procedia 14 ( 2016 ) 518 – 527 6th Transport Research Arena April 18-21, 2016 Multi-annual program “By Railway to the 21st Century” as key factor in the development of rail transport in Poland Marek Bartosika,*, S ławomir Wiaka aLodz University of Technology, 18/22 Stefanowskiego Str., Lodz 90-924, Poland Abstract In the paper the present conditions of rail transport RT in Poland and determinants of RT development, including high-speed rail HSR, have been discussed. The Multi-annual Program (MAP) “By railway to the 21st century” as a multifunctional system of scientific, technical and educational support for the development of RT and integrated regional transportation systems, has been presented. The importance of MAP for Poland and RT sector has been discussed. The Rail Transport Consortium (RTC) established for the implementation of MAP, its objectives and effects of MAP realization in 2020 ÷ 2030+ were described. The international and national aspects of RT development (including HSR) and implementation of the MAP, have been analyzed. © 2016 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license © (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ 2016The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V.). PeerPeer-review-review under under responsibility responsibility of Road of Road and Bridgeand Bridge Research Research Institute Institute (IBDiM) (IBDiM). Keywords: rail transport; high-speed railways; multi-annual program; transport policy 1. Introduction Prior experience of EU-15 countries demonstrates that good functioning of national economies is not possible without efficient inter-regional railway transport RLT. -
NS Annual Report 2018
See www.nsannualreport.nl for the online version NS Annual Report 2018 Table of contents 2 In brief 4 2018 in a nutshell 8 Foreword by the CEO 12 The profile of NS 16 Our strategy Activities in the Netherlands 23 Results for 2018 27 The train journey experience 35 Operational performance 47 World-class stations Operations abroad 54 Abellio 56 Strategy 58 Abellio United Kingdom (UK) 68 Abellio Germany 74 Looking ahead NS Group 81 Report by the Supervisory Board 94 Corporate governance 100 Organisation of risk management 114 Finances in brief 126 Our impact on the environment and on society 134 NS as an employer in the Netherlands 139 Organisational improvements 145 Dialogue with our stakeholders 164 Scope and reporting criteria Financial statements 168 Financial statements 238 Company financial statements Other information 245 Combined independent auditor’s report on the financial statements and sustainability information 256 NS ten-year summary This annual report is published both Dutch and English. In the event of any discrepancies between the Dutch and English version, the Dutch version will prevail. 1 NS annual report 2018 In brief More satisfied 4.2 million trips by NS app gets seat passengers in the OV-fiets searcher Netherlands (2017: 3.1 million) On some routes, 86% gave travelling by passengers can see which train a score of 7 out of carriages have free seats 10 or higher Customer 95.1% chance of Clean trains: 68% of satisfaction with HSL getting a seat passengers gave a South score of 7 out of 10 (2017: 95.0%) or higher 83% of -
Belt and Road Transport Corridors: Barriers and Investments
Munich Personal RePEc Archive Belt and Road Transport Corridors: Barriers and Investments Lobyrev, Vitaly and Tikhomirov, Andrey and Tsukarev, Taras and Vinokurov, Evgeny Eurasian Development Bank, Institute of Economy and Transport Development 10 May 2018 Online at https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/86705/ MPRA Paper No. 86705, posted 18 May 2018 16:33 UTC BELT AND ROAD TRANSPORT CORRIDORS: BARRIERS AND INVESTMENTS Authors: Vitaly Lobyrev; Andrey Tikhomirov (Institute of Economy and Transport Development); Taras Tsukarev, PhD (Econ); Evgeny Vinokurov, PhD (Econ) (EDB Centre for Integration Studies). This report presents the results of an analysis of the impact that international freight traffic barriers have on logistics, transit potential, and development of transport corridors traversing EAEU member states. The authors of EDB Centre for Integration Studies Report No. 49 maintain that, if current railway freight rates and Chinese railway subsidies remain in place, by 2020 container traffic along the China-EAEU-EU axis may reach 250,000 FEU. At the same time, long-term freight traffic growth is restricted by a number of internal and external factors. The question is: What can be done to fully realise the existing trans-Eurasian transit potential? Removal of non-tariff and technical barriers is one of the key target areas. Restrictions discussed in this report include infrastructural (transport and logistical infrastructure), border/customs-related, and administrative/legal restrictions. The findings of a survey conducted among European consignors is a valuable source of information on these subjects. The authors present their recommendations regarding what can be done to remove the barriers that hamper international freight traffic along the China-EAEU-EU axis. -
Long Freight Trains in Poland, What Is the Problem of Its Usage?
PRACE NAUKOWE POLITECHNIKI WARSZAWSKIEJ z. 111 Transport 2016 Krzysztof Lewandowski _"G#"G+@V"G @Y"*" LONG FREIGHT TRAINS IN POLAND, WHAT IS THE PROBLEM OF ITS USAGE? The manuscript delivered: April 2016 Abstract: The article presents an analysis of possibility of usage of long freight trains in Poland for connection with the modern Silk Railway to China. The desire to use freight trains with a length of more than 600 meters in Poland encounters several problems on the existing infrastructure. Limita- tions of usage are found here. Also, it presents possible ways for long freight trains. Keywords: long freight train, limitation, usage, Poland 1. INTRODUCTION The first step to create a new connection to China was made in 1990 just before collapsed the Soviet Union. In next year, 1991, many countries retrieved the independence. The idea of reviving east – west trade on the old Silk Road was raised by the Minister of Foreign Affairs for the USSR, Eduard Shevardnadze in September 1990 at the Vladivostok Interna- tional Conference. In several years was many conferences to create the new transport cor- ridor Transport Corridor Europe–Caucasus–Asia (TRACECA) through Armenia, Azerbai- jan, Bulgaria, Georgia, Iran, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Moldova, Romania, Tajikistan, Tur- key, Ukraine and Uzbekistan [47]. On 1999 Poland and Ukraine signed memorandum "XL - Odessa [49]. On 2014 was increased the tensions between Kyiv and Moscow. In spring 2014, Russia began a military invasion on the Crimea peninsula and military conflict in eastern Ukraine. Russia decided to create sanctions against Ukraine and began to limit the free transit for Ukrainian goods through its territory. -
Aleksander Sładkowski Editor Rail Transport— Systems Approach Studies in Systems, Decision and Control
Studies in Systems, Decision and Control 87 Aleksander Sładkowski Editor Rail Transport— Systems Approach Studies in Systems, Decision and Control Volume 87 Series editor Janusz Kacprzyk, Polish Academy of Sciences, Warsaw, Poland e-mail: [email protected] About this Series The series “Studies in Systems, Decision and Control” (SSDC) covers both new developments and advances, as well as the state of the art, in the various areas of broadly perceived systems, decision making and control- quickly, up to date and with a high quality. The intent is to cover the theory, applications, and perspectives on the state of the art and future developments relevant to systems, decision making, control, complex processes and related areas, as embedded in the fields of engineering, computer science, physics, economics, social and life sciences, as well as the paradigms and methodologies behind them. The series contains monographs, textbooks, lecture notes and edited volumes in systems, decision making and control spanning the areas of Cyber-Physical Systems, Autonomous Systems, Sensor Networks, Control Systems, Energy Systems, Automotive Systems, Biological Systems, Vehicular Networking and Connected Vehicles, Aerospace Systems, Automation, Manufacturing, Smart Grids, Nonlinear Systems, Power Systems, Robotics, Social Systems, Economic Systems and other. Of particular value to both the contributors and the readership are the short publication timeframe and the world-wide distribution and exposure which enable both a wide and rapid dissemination of -
5Th Status Report About the Implementation Progress of the TAP TSI
Report 5th TAP TSI Implementation progress report - ERA-REP-152 IMPL-2019-03 V 1.0 Making the railway system work better for society. Report 5th status report about the implementation progress of the TAP TSI Drafted by Validated by Approved by Stefan JUGELT Name Felice FERRARI Pio GUIDO Kresimir RAGUZ Position Project Officers Head of Unit Head of Department Date 15/01/2020 02/04/2020 03/04/2020 Signed Signed Signed Document History Version Date Comments 1st draft for the presentation at the TAP TSI 0.1 26/03/2019 cooperation group 0.2 15/05/2019 Inclusion of comments from NCPs 1.0 15/01/2020 Final version 120 Rue Marc Lefrancq | BP 20392 | FR-59307 Valenciennes Cedex 1 / 95 Tel. +33 (0)327 09 65 00 | era.europa.eu Any printed copy is uncontrolled. The version in force is available on Agency’s intranet/extranet. Report 5th TAP TSI Implementation progress report - ERA-REP-152 IMPL-2019-03 V 1.0 Contents Acronyms ............................................................................................................................................................ 4 Reference documents ........................................................................................................................................ 5 Reference legislation .......................................................................................................................................... 5 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ........................................................................................................................ 6 2 Introduction -
World Bank Document
Document of The World Bank FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY Public Disclosure Authorized /,00V .3 / 49 3 - fdoA 3 / 49 C/ -Z e4 ReportNo. 8431-POL STAFF APPRAISALREPORT Public Disclosure Authorized POLAND FIRST TRANSPORTPROJECT APRIL 5, 1990 Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized InfrastructureOperations Division CountryDepartment IV Europe,Middle East and North Africa Region This documenthas a restricted distributionand may be used by recipients only in the performanceof their official duties. Its contents may not otherwise be disclosed without World Bank authorization. CURRENCYAND EOUIVALENTUNITS CurrencyUnit - Zloty (ZL) (Averagerates) May Dec. Jan. 1986 1987 1988 1989 1989 1990 1 US$ 175 265 430 850 4900 9500 WEIGHTS AND MEASURES Metric System US System 1 meter (m) 3.2808 feet (ft) 1 kilometer (km) - 0.6214 mile (mi) 2 1 square kilometer (kin) - 0.3861 square mile (Mi) 1 metric ton (m ton) = 0.9842 long ton (lg ton) 1 kilogram (kg) - 2.2046 pounds (lbs) ABBREVIATIONSAND ACRONYMS AADT - Annual Average Daily Traffic ABS - AutomaticBlock System COCOM - CoordinatingCommittee for MultilateralExports CTC - CentralizedTraffic Control GDDP - DirectorateGeneral of Public Roads GNP - Gross National Product LOT - Polish Airlines MIS ManagementInformation System MTME - Ministryof Transportand Maritime Economy MY - Marshalling Yard NBP - National Bank of Poland OMIS OperatingManagement Information System PEKAES - InternationalRoad Freight Company PKP - Polish State Railways PKS - NationalRoad TransportEnterprise PMS - PavementManagement System POL - Polish Ocean Lines PSK Polish Domestic FreightForwarders S & T - Signallingand Telecommunications TM - Traffic Management TMIS - TransportManagement Information System UIC - InternationalRailway Union ZNTKS - Enterprisefor the Repair of Rolling Stock at Stargard ZwUS - Signal Equipment Works POLAND: FISCAL YEAR January 1 - December 31 FOR OMCIAL UE ONLY STAFF APPRAISALREPORT POLAND FIRST TRANSPORTPROJECT Table of Contents Pag-eNo. -
Eighth Annual Market Monitoring Working Document March 2020
Eighth Annual Market Monitoring Working Document March 2020 List of contents List of country abbreviations and regulatory bodies .................................................. 6 List of figures ............................................................................................................ 7 1. Introduction .............................................................................................. 9 2. Network characteristics of the railway market ........................................ 11 2.1. Total route length ..................................................................................................... 12 2.2. Electrified route length ............................................................................................. 12 2.3. High-speed route length ........................................................................................... 13 2.4. Main infrastructure manager’s share of route length .............................................. 14 2.5. Network usage intensity ........................................................................................... 15 3. Track access charges paid by railway undertakings for the Minimum Access Package .................................................................................................. 17 4. Railway undertakings and global rail traffic ............................................. 23 4.1. Railway undertakings ................................................................................................ 24 4.2. Total rail traffic ......................................................................................................... -
Freight Market Structure and Requirements for Intermodal Shifts
Freight Market Structure and Requirements for Intermodal Shifts Project no.TREN/06/FP6TR/S07.60148 FREIGHTWISE Management Framework for Intelligent Intermodal Transport Integrated Project (IP) Sustainable surface transport - Rebalancing and integrating different transport modes Deliverable 11.1 ‘Freight Market Structure and Requirements for Intermodal Shifts’ Due date of deliverable: 31/05/07 Actual submission date: 09/07/07 Start date of project: 31/10/2006 Duration: 36M Organisation name of lead contractor for this deliverable: AMRIE, Walter Vassallo Revision [Final] Project co-funded by the European Commission within the Sixth Framework Programme (2002- 2006) Dissemination Level PU Public PP Restricted to other programme participants (including the Commission RE Restrictedi) to a group specified by the consortium (including the Confidential,ii onlyi) for members of the consortium (including the CO Commission Services) 1 Freight Market Structure and Requirements for Intermodal Shifts Document Title: WP Deliverabl Document number: e number: number: WP11 ‘Freight market structure and WP11 D11.1 1 requirements for intermodal shifts’ Document Version Comments Date Authorised History by 0.1 First distributed 2007-10-24 kef 1.0 Final 1.5 RESUBMISSION 2.0 Revised Walter Vassallo 2008-04-16 WV 2.5 Joined With SETREF contr ch 7 & 8 2008-04-17 SAW 2007-10-24 Classificati Public on: Number of pages: 162 Number of annexes: 6 2 Freight Market Structure and Requirements for Intermodal Shifts Main Author and WP Leader: Walter Vassallo, AMRIE Authors and Contributors: Annalisa Alcinesio, AMRIE Irina Roussina, AMRIE Chris Rowland, MDST Tony Morall, BMT Eva Gelova, CDV Ioan Cuncev, SETREF Elli Krassopoulou, SETREF Csaba Orosz, SETREF Dimitar Stoyanov, SETREF Smiljan Vukanovic, SETREF 3 Freight Market Structure and Requirements for Intermodal Shifts TABLE OF CONTENTS Abbreviations ........................................................................................................................... -
Transformation of the Chojnice Railway Junction in the Years 1989-2017 and Future Operational Perspectives
Transport Geography Papers of Polish Geographical Society 2018, 21(4), 30-43 DOI 10.4467/2543859XPKG.18.020.10778 Received: 20.11.2018 Received in revised form: 20.12.2018 Accepted: 21.12.2018 Published: 29.12.2018 TRANSFORMATION OF THE CHOJNICE RAILWAY JUNCTION IN THE YEARS 1989-2017 AND FUTURE OPERATIONAL PERSPECTIVES Przekształcenia węzła kolejowego w Chojnicach w latach 1989-2017 i perspektywy jego funkcjonowania w przyszłości Damian Otta (1), Renata Anisiewicz (2), Tadeusz Palmowski (3) (1) Association of Rail Enthusiasts in Chojnice, Strzelecka 68, 89-600 Chojnice, Poland E-mail: [email protected] (2) Departament of Regional Development, Institute of Geography, Faculty of Oceanography and Geography, University of Gdańsk, Jana Bażyńskiego 4, 80-309 Gdańsk, Poland E-mail: [email protected] (3) Departament of Regional Development, Institute of Geography, Faculty of Oceanography and Geography, University of Gdańsk, Jana Bażyńskiego 4, 80-309 Gdańsk, Poland (corresponding author) E-mail: [email protected] Citation: Otta D., Anisiewicz R., Palmowski T., 2018, Transformation of the Chojnice railway junction in the years 1989-2017 and future operational perspectives, Prace Komisji Geografii Komunikacji PTG, 21(4), 30-43. Abstract: The paper presents changes in the operation of the railway junction in Chojnice and neighbouring areas, and the impact thereof in the years 1989-2017. The analysis covers infrastructural changes, passenger traffic and organisational changes resulting from the transformation of the Polish State Railways (PKP) after 1989. The Chojnice railway junction, operating since the seventies of the nineteenth century is one of the biggest junctions in northern Poland. -
TGV Paris-Milan
22nd Hellenic Logistics Conference Athens, 28-29 November 2018 Luisa Velardi 1. Single European Railway Area 2. Trains beyond borders 3. Companies beyond borders 2. Trains beyond borders 1. Single European Railway Area 3. Companies beyond borders Opening up national freight and passenger markets to cross-border competition has been a major step towards creating an integrated European railway area and a genuine EU internal market for rail • Boosting competition. Different organisational entities must be set up for transport operations on the one hand and infrastructure management on the other. • Opening markets Europe-wide. As well as encouraging greater competition within national markets, EU legislation gives rail operators the ability to run services in and between other EU countries, opening up cross-border competition. Source: https://ec.europa.eu/transport/modes/rail/market_en 2. Trains beyond borders 1. Single European Railway Area 3. Companies beyond borders Technical pillar • save firms from having to file costly multiple applications in the case of operations beyond one single Member State. ERA will issue vehicle authorizations for placing on the market and safety certificates for railway undertakings, valid throughout the EU. • create a "One stop shop" which will act as a single entry point for all such applications, using easy, transparent and consistent procedures. • ensure that European Rail Traffic Management System (ERTMS) equipment is interoperable. • reduce the large number of remaining national rules, which create a risk of insufficient transparency and disguised discrimination of new operators. Source: https://ec.europa.eu/transport/modes/rail/packages/2013_en 2. Trains beyond borders 1. Single European Railway Area 3. -
Study - Exploiting the Possibility of Creating a Rail
Study - Exploiting the Possibility of Creating a Rail Freight Corridor Linking Poland and the Netherlands Study - Exploiting the Possibility of Creating a Rail Freight Corridor Linking Poland and the Netherlands drs. A.A. Roest Crollius This report has been financed by the Ministry of Transport Poland and the Ministry of Transport, Public Works and Water Management the Netherlands. Reference R20100005/31069000/ARC/RLO Final Version Zoetermeer, March 2010 Study - Exploiting the Possibility of Creating a Rail Freight Corridor Linking Poland and the Netherlands Contents 1 MANAGEMENT SUMMARY 7 1.1 Introduction 7 1.2 Task 1 – Current situation on the market and its’ potential for further development 7 1.3 Task 2 – Identification of barriers to further development 10 1.4 Task 3 – Selection of the Paths and Terminals 12 1.5 Task 4: Action Plan for Rail Freight Corridor the Netherlands – Poland 14 1.5.1 Introduction 14 1.5.2 Methodology 15 1.5.3 Main barriers to the corridor development 15 1.5.4 Action Plan 16 1.5.5 Elaboration of the action plan 21 1.6 Strategies considered by the market players 27 1.6.1 Most important milestones 29 2 CURRENT SITUATION ON THE MARKET AND ITS’ POTENTIAL FOR FURTHER DEVELOPMENT 31 2.1 Freight volumes analysis on the corridor Netherlands – Poland 32 2.1.1 Introduction 32 2.1.2 Methodology rail corridor Netherlands – Poland study 36 2.1.3 Results 38 2.1.4 Conclusions 46 2.2 Intermodal transport analysis 46 2.2.1 Rail shuttle connections and market parties 48 2.2.2 Rail transport compared to other transport modes