DOCSLIB.ORG

The Hormone-Bound Vitamin D Receptor Regulates Turnover of Target

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Hormone-Bound Vitamin D Receptor Regulates Turnover of Target The hormone-bound vitamin D receptor regulates turnover of target proteins of the SCFFBW7 E3 ligase By Reyhaneh Salehi Tabar Department of Experimental Medicine McGill University Montreal, QC, Canada April 2016 A thesis submitted to McGill University in partial fulfillment of the requirements of the degree of Doctor of Philosophy © Reyhaneh Salehi Tabar 1 Table of Contents Abbreviations ................................................................................................................................................ 7 Abstract ....................................................................................................................................................... 10 Rèsumè ....................................................................................................................................................... 13 Acknowledgements ..................................................................................................................................... 16 Preface ........................................................................................................................................................ 17 Contribution of authors .............................................................................................................................. 18 Chapter 1-Literature review........................................................................................................................ 20 1.1. General introduction and overview of thesis ............................................................................. 20 1.2. 1,25D signaling ................................................................................................................................. 21 1.2.1 The vitamin D receptor .................................................................................................................. 23 1.2.2. Non-genomic actions of 1,25D...................................................................................................... 24 1.2.3. Genomic action of 1,25D .............................................................................................................. 24 1.2.4. 1,25D-mediated Transcriptional activation .................................................................................. 25 1.2.5. 1,25D-mediated Transcriptional repression ................................................................................. 25 1.2.6. 1,25D signaling in cancer .............................................................................................................. 26 1.2.7. Anti-proliferative effects of 1,25D ................................................................................................ 26 1.2.8. Induction of apoptosis by 1,25D ................................................................................................... 27 1.2.9. 1,25D pro-differentiating effects .................................................................................................. 27 1.2.10. 1,25D anti-Inflammatory effects ................................................................................................. 27 1.2.11. Inhibition of invasion and metastasis by 1,25D .......................................................................... 28 1.3. c-Myc Transcription Factor .............................................................................................................. 28 1.3.1. MYC gene ...................................................................................................................................... 29 1.3.2. c-Myc protein ................................................................................................................................ 31 1.3.3. c-Myc regulation ........................................................................................................................... 32 1.3.3.1. Regulation of MYC transcription ................................................................................................ 33 1.3.3.2. MYC mRNA stability regulation .................................................................................................. 34 1.3.3.3. c-Myc Protein stability regulation .............................................................................................. 36 1.3.3.3.1. c-Myc Modifications ............................................................................................................... 36 1.3.3.3.1.1. Ubiquitination of c-Myc ....................................................................................................... 38 1.3.3.3.1.1.1. Ubiquitination and c-Myc degradation ............................................................................. 38 1.3.3.3.1.1.1.1. Ubiquitination by FBW7 ................................................................................................. 38 1.3.3.3.1.1.2. Ubiquitination for stabilization or activation .................................................................... 40 2 1.3.4. Transcriptional activation by c-Myc .............................................................................................. 40 1.3.5. Transcriptional repression by c-Myc ............................................................................................. 41 1.3.6. DNA binding of c-Myc ................................................................................................................... 41 1.3.7. Functions of c-Myc ........................................................................................................................ 42 1.3.7.1. Cell cycle regulation by c-Myc ................................................................................................... 43 1.3.7.2. Apoptosis induction by c-Myc .................................................................................................... 45 1.3.8. c-Myc Deregulation in Cancer ....................................................................................................... 45 1.3.8.1. MYC Mutations in Cancer .......................................................................................................... 48 1.3.8.2. c-Myc Signaling in Cancer .......................................................................................................... 49 1.4. MAX protein ..................................................................................................................................... 49 1.4.1. c-Myc/MAX/MXD1 network ......................................................................................................... 50 1.5. MXD1 Transcription Factor .............................................................................................................. 50 1.5.1. MXD1 cofactors antagonize c-Myc cofactors ............................................................................... 51 1.5.2. Regulation of proliferation and apoptosis by MXD1 .................................................................... 51 1.5.3. Regulation of MXD1 transcription ................................................................................................ 52 1.5.4. Regulation of MXD1 protein ......................................................................................................... 53 1.6. Protein ubiquitination ...................................................................................................................... 53 1.6.1. Ubiquitin Proteasome System (UPS) ............................................................................................. 54 1.6.1.1. Proteasome complex ................................................................................................................. 54 1.6.1.2. Ubiquitin .................................................................................................................................... 55 1.6.2. E3 ligases ....................................................................................................................................... 56 1.6.2.1. HECT domain E3s ....................................................................................................................... 57 1.6.2.2. RING finger E3s .......................................................................................................................... 57 1.6.2.2.1. Multi-subunit RING finger E3s ................................................................................................ 58 1.6.2.2.1.1. Cullin Ring Ligases (CRLs) ..................................................................................................... 58 1.6.2.2.2. RING-IBR-RING E3s .................................................................................................................. 59 1.6.2.3. U-Box proteins ........................................................................................................................... 60 1.6.3. Substrate recognition mediator in SCF E3 ligase complex ............................................................ 60 1.6.3.1. F-Box proteins ............................................................................................................................ 60 1.6.3.1.1. FBW7 ....................................................................................................................................... 61 1.6.3.1.1.1. FBW7 gene and isoforms ..................................................................................................... 61 1.6.3.1.1.2. FBW7 and GSK3s .................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Reproductionreview
    REPRODUCTIONREVIEW Forkhead transcription factors in ovarian function Nina Henriette Uhlenhaut and Mathias Treier Max Delbru¨ck Center for Molecular Medicine, Robert Ro¨ssle Straße 10, 13125 Berlin-Buch, Germany Correspondence should be addressed to N H Uhlenhaut; Email: [email protected] Abstract Since the discovery of the conserved forkhead (Fkh) DNA binding domain more than 20 years ago, members of the Fkh or forkhead box (FOX) family of transcription factors have been shown to act as important regulators of numerous developmental and homeostatic processes. The human genome contains 44 Fkh genes, several of which have recently been reported to be essential for female fertility. In this review, we highlight the roles of specific FOX proteins in ovarian folliculogenesis and present our current understanding of their molecular function. In particular, we describe what we have learned from loss-of-function studies using mouse models as well as human genetics and illustrate how different stages of folliculogenesis, both in oocytes and in somatic granulosa and theca cells, are regulated by FOXC1, FOXL2, and FOXO subfamily members. Reproduction (2011) 142 489–495 Introduction stages of folliculogenesis. This transition is marked by oocyte growth and proliferation of the adjacent granu- Female fertility depends on a delicate balance of losa cells that become cuboidal. Antral follicles are hormonal stimuli and cellular interactions, which formed when fluid-filled spaces develop between the ultimately enable conception and a successful preg- multi-layered granulosa cells. During preantral to antral nancy. Current estimates state that 10–15% of couples transition, the oocyte resumes meiosis, and after worldwide remain childless due to infertility, with stimulation by pituitary gonadotropins, FSH, and LH, genetic etiology making up a significant proportion the mature oocyte is expelled from the follicle and moves (Matzuk & Lamb 2002).
    [Show full text]
  • Activated Peripheral-Blood-Derived Mononuclear Cells
    Transcription factor expression in lipopolysaccharide- activated peripheral-blood-derived mononuclear cells Jared C. Roach*†, Kelly D. Smith*‡, Katie L. Strobe*, Stephanie M. Nissen*, Christian D. Haudenschild§, Daixing Zhou§, Thomas J. Vasicek¶, G. A. Heldʈ, Gustavo A. Stolovitzkyʈ, Leroy E. Hood*†, and Alan Aderem* *Institute for Systems Biology, 1441 North 34th Street, Seattle, WA 98103; ‡Department of Pathology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195; §Illumina, 25861 Industrial Boulevard, Hayward, CA 94545; ¶Medtronic, 710 Medtronic Parkway, Minneapolis, MN 55432; and ʈIBM Computational Biology Center, P.O. Box 218, Yorktown Heights, NY 10598 Contributed by Leroy E. Hood, August 21, 2007 (sent for review January 7, 2007) Transcription factors play a key role in integrating and modulating system. In this model system, we activated peripheral-blood-derived biological information. In this study, we comprehensively measured mononuclear cells, which can be loosely termed ‘‘macrophages,’’ the changing abundances of mRNAs over a time course of activation with lipopolysaccharide (LPS). We focused on the precise mea- of human peripheral-blood-derived mononuclear cells (‘‘macro- surement of mRNA concentrations. There is currently no high- phages’’) with lipopolysaccharide. Global and dynamic analysis of throughput technology that can precisely and sensitively measure all transcription factors in response to a physiological stimulus has yet to mRNAs in a system, although such technologies are likely to be be achieved in a human system, and our efforts significantly available in the near future. To demonstrate the potential utility of advanced this goal. We used multiple global high-throughput tech- such technologies, and to motivate their development and encour- nologies for measuring mRNA levels, including massively parallel age their use, we produced data from a combination of two distinct signature sequencing and GeneChip microarrays.
    [Show full text]
  • Hypoxia and Oxygen-Sensing Signaling in Gene Regulation and Cancer Progression
    International Journal of Molecular Sciences Review Hypoxia and Oxygen-Sensing Signaling in Gene Regulation and Cancer Progression Guang Yang, Rachel Shi and Qing Zhang * Department of Pathology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX 75390, USA; [email protected] (G.Y.); [email protected] (R.S.) * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +1-214-645-4671 Received: 6 October 2020; Accepted: 29 October 2020; Published: 31 October 2020 Abstract: Oxygen homeostasis regulation is the most fundamental cellular process for adjusting physiological oxygen variations, and its irregularity leads to various human diseases, including cancer. Hypoxia is closely associated with cancer development, and hypoxia/oxygen-sensing signaling plays critical roles in the modulation of cancer progression. The key molecules of the hypoxia/oxygen-sensing signaling include the transcriptional regulator hypoxia-inducible factor (HIF) which widely controls oxygen responsive genes, the central members of the 2-oxoglutarate (2-OG)-dependent dioxygenases, such as prolyl hydroxylase (PHD or EglN), and an E3 ubiquitin ligase component for HIF degeneration called von Hippel–Lindau (encoding protein pVHL). In this review, we summarize the current knowledge about the canonical hypoxia signaling, HIF transcription factors, and pVHL. In addition, the role of 2-OG-dependent enzymes, such as DNA/RNA-modifying enzymes, JmjC domain-containing enzymes, and prolyl hydroxylases, in gene regulation of cancer progression, is specifically reviewed. We also discuss the therapeutic advancement of targeting hypoxia and oxygen sensing pathways in cancer. Keywords: hypoxia; PHDs; TETs; JmjCs; HIFs 1. Introduction Molecular oxygen serves as a co-factor in many biochemical processes and is fundamental for aerobic organisms to maintain intracellular ATP levels [1,2].
    [Show full text]
  • Expression of Oncogenes ELK1 and ELK3 in Cancer
    Review Article Annals of Colorectal Cancer Research Published: 11 Nov, 2019 Expression of Oncogenes ELK1 and ELK3 in Cancer Akhlaq Ahmad and Asif Hayat* College of Chemistry, Fuzhou University, China Abstract Cancer is the uncontrolled growth of abnormal cells anywhere in a body, ELK1 and ELK3 is a member of the Ets-domain transcription factor family and the TCF (Ternary Complex Factor) subfamily. Proteins in this subfamily regulate transcription when recruited by SRF (Serum Response Factor) to bind to serum response elements. ELK1 and ELK3 transcription factors are known as oncogenes. Both transcription factors are proliferated in a different of type of cancer. Herein, we summarized the expression of transcription factor ELK1 and ELK3 in cancer cells. Keywords: ETS; ELK1; ELK3; Transcription factor; Cancer Introduction The ETS, a transcription factor of E twenty-six family based on a dominant ETS amino acids that integrated with a ~10-basepair element arrange in highly mid core sequence 5′-GGA(A/T)-3′ [1-2]. The secular family alter enormous 28/29 members which has been assigned in human and mouse and similarly the family description are further sub-divided into nine sub-families according to their homology and domain factor [3]. More importantly, one of the subfamily members such as ELK (ETS-like) adequate an N-terminal ETS DNA-binding domain along with a B-box domain that transmit the response of serum factor upon the formation of ternary complex and therefore manifested as ternary complex factors [4]. Further the ELK sub-divided into Elk1, Elk3 (Net, Erp or Sap2) and Elk4 (Sap1) proteins [3,4], which simulated varied proportional of potential protein- protein interactions [4,5].
    [Show full text]
  • Single Cell Transcriptomics Reveal Temporal Dynamics of Critical Regulators of Germ Cell Fate During Mouse Sex Determination
    bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/747279; this version posted November 2, 2020. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license. 1 Single cell transcriptomics reveal temporal dynamics of critical regulators of germ 2 cell fate during mouse sex determination 3 Authors: Chloé Mayère1,2, Yasmine Neirijnck1,3, Pauline Sararols1, Chris M Rands1, 4 Isabelle Stévant1,2, Françoise Kühne1, Anne-Amandine Chassot3, Marie-Christine 5 Chaboissier3, Emmanouil T. Dermitzakis1,2, Serge Nef1,2,*. 6 Affiliations: 7 1Department of Genetic Medicine and Development, University of Geneva, 1211 Geneva, 8 Switzerland; 9 2iGE3, Institute of Genetics and Genomics of Geneva, University of Geneva, 1211 10 Geneva, Switzerland; 11 3Université Côte d'Azur, CNRS, Inserm, iBV, France; 12 Lead Contact: 13 *Corresponding Author: Serge Nef, 1 rue Michel-Servet CH-1211 Genève 4, 14 [email protected]. + 41 (0)22 379 51 93 15 Running Title: Single cell transcriptomics of germ cells 1 bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/747279; this version posted November 2, 2020. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license. 16 Abbreviations; 17 AGC: Adrenal Germ Cell 18 GC: Germ cell 19 OGC: Ovarian Germ Cell 20 TGC: Testicular Germ Cell 21 scRNA-seq: Single-cell RNA-Sequencing 22 DEG: Differentially Expressed Gene 23 24 25 Keywords: 26 Single-cell RNA-Sequencing (scRNA-seq), sex determination, ovary, testis, gonocytes, 27 oocytes, prospermatogonia, meiosis, gene regulatory network, germ cells, development, 28 RNA splicing 29 2 bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/747279; this version posted November 2, 2020.
    [Show full text]
  • Multifactorial Erβ and NOTCH1 Control of Squamous Differentiation and Cancer
    Multifactorial ERβ and NOTCH1 control of squamous differentiation and cancer Yang Sui Brooks, … , Karine Lefort, G. Paolo Dotto J Clin Invest. 2014;124(5):2260-2276. https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI72718. Research Article Oncology Downmodulation or loss-of-function mutations of the gene encoding NOTCH1 are associated with dysfunctional squamous cell differentiation and development of squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) in skin and internal organs. While NOTCH1 receptor activation has been well characterized, little is known about how NOTCH1 gene transcription is regulated. Using bioinformatics and functional screening approaches, we identified several regulators of the NOTCH1 gene in keratinocytes, with the transcription factors DLX5 and EGR3 and estrogen receptor β (ERβ) directly controlling its expression in differentiation. DLX5 and ERG3 are required for RNA polymerase II (PolII) recruitment to the NOTCH1 locus, while ERβ controls NOTCH1 transcription through RNA PolII pause release. Expression of several identified NOTCH1 regulators, including ERβ, is frequently compromised in skin, head and neck, and lung SCCs and SCC-derived cell lines. Furthermore, a keratinocyte ERβ–dependent program of gene expression is subverted in SCCs from various body sites, and there are consistent differences in mutation and gene-expression signatures of head and neck and lung SCCs in female versus male patients. Experimentally increased ERβ expression or treatment with ERβ agonists inhibited proliferation of SCC cells and promoted NOTCH1 expression and squamous differentiation both in vitro and in mouse xenotransplants. Our data identify a link between transcriptional control of NOTCH1 expression and the estrogen response in keratinocytes, with implications for differentiation therapy of squamous cancer. Find the latest version: https://jci.me/72718/pdf Research article Multifactorial ERβ and NOTCH1 control of squamous differentiation and cancer Yang Sui Brooks,1,2 Paola Ostano,3 Seung-Hee Jo,1,2 Jun Dai,1,2 Spiro Getsios,4 Piotr Dziunycz,5 Günther F.L.
    [Show full text]
  • Roles of the CSE1L-Mediated Nuclear Import Pathway in Epigenetic
    Roles of the CSE1L-mediated nuclear import pathway PNAS PLUS in epigenetic silencing Qiang Donga,b,c, Xiang Lia,b,c, Cheng-Zhi Wangb, Shaohua Xuc, Gang Yuanc, Wei Shaoc, Baodong Liud, Yong Zhengb, Hailin Wangd, Xiaoguang Leic,e,f, Zhuqiang Zhangb,1, and Bing Zhua,b,g,1 aGraduate Program, Peking Union Medical College and Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, 100730 Beijing, China; bNational Laboratory of Biomacromolecules, CAS Center for Excellence in Biomacromolecules, Institute of Biophysics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 100101 Beijing, China; cNational Institute of Biological Sciences, 102206 Beijing, China; dThe State Key Laboratory of Environmental Chemistry and Ecotoxicology, Research Center for Eco-Environmental Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 100085 Beijing, China; eBeijing National Laboratory for Molecular Sciences, Department of Chemical Biology, College of Chemistry and Molecular Engineering, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China; fPeking-Tsinghua Center for Life Sciences, Peking University, 100871 Beijing, China; and gCollege of Life Sciences, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, 100049 Beijing, China Edited by Arthur D. Riggs, Beckman Research Institute of City of Hope, Duarte, CA, and approved March 21, 2018 (received for review January 17, 2018) Epigenetic silencing can be mediated by various mechanisms, CSE1L, a key player in the nuclear import pathway, as an es- and many regulators remain to be identified. Here, we report a sential factor for maintaining the repression of many methyl- genome-wide siRNA screening to identify regulators essential for ated genes. Mechanistically, CSE1L functions by facilitating maintaining gene repression of a CMV promoter silenced by DNA the nuclear import of certain cargo proteins that are essential methylation.
    [Show full text]
  • Prospective Isolation of NKX2-1–Expressing Human Lung Progenitors Derived from Pluripotent Stem Cells
    The Journal of Clinical Investigation RESEARCH ARTICLE Prospective isolation of NKX2-1–expressing human lung progenitors derived from pluripotent stem cells Finn Hawkins,1,2 Philipp Kramer,3 Anjali Jacob,1,2 Ian Driver,4 Dylan C. Thomas,1 Katherine B. McCauley,1,2 Nicholas Skvir,1 Ana M. Crane,3 Anita A. Kurmann,1,5 Anthony N. Hollenberg,5 Sinead Nguyen,1 Brandon G. Wong,6 Ahmad S. Khalil,6,7 Sarah X.L. Huang,3,8 Susan Guttentag,9 Jason R. Rock,4 John M. Shannon,10 Brian R. Davis,3 and Darrell N. Kotton1,2 2 1Center for Regenerative Medicine, and The Pulmonary Center and Department of Medicine, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts, USA. 3Center for Stem Cell and Regenerative Medicine, Brown Foundation Institute of Molecular Medicine, University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston, Texas, USA. 4Department of Anatomy, UCSF, San Francisco, California, USA. 5Division of Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA. 6Department of Biomedical Engineering and Biological Design Center, Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts, USA. 7Wyss Institute for Biologically Inspired Engineering, Harvard University, Boston, Massachusetts, USA. 8Columbia Center for Translational Immunology & Columbia Center for Human Development, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York, USA. 9Department of Pediatrics, Monroe Carell Jr. Children’s Hospital, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee, USA. 10Division of Pulmonary Biology, Cincinnati Children’s Hospital, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA. It has been postulated that during human fetal development, all cells of the lung epithelium derive from embryonic, endodermal, NK2 homeobox 1–expressing (NKX2-1+) precursor cells.
    [Show full text]
  • Further Delineation of Chromosomal Consensus Regions in Primary
    Leukemia (2007) 21, 2463–2469 & 2007 Nature Publishing Group All rights reserved 0887-6924/07 $30.00 www.nature.com/leu ORIGINAL ARTICLE Further delineation of chromosomal consensus regions in primary mediastinal B-cell lymphomas: an analysis of 37 tumor samples using high-resolution genomic profiling (array-CGH) S Wessendorf1,6, TFE Barth2,6, A Viardot1, A Mueller3, HA Kestler3, H Kohlhammer1, P Lichter4, M Bentz5,HDo¨hner1,PMo¨ller2 and C Schwaenen1 1Klinik fu¨r Innere Medizin III, Zentrum fu¨r Innere Medizin der Universita¨t Ulm, Ulm, Germany; 2Institut fu¨r Pathologie, Universita¨t Ulm, Ulm, Germany; 3Forschungsdozentur Bioinformatik, Universita¨t Ulm, Ulm, Germany; 4Abt. Molekulare Genetik, Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum, Heidelberg, Germany and 5Sta¨dtisches Klinikum Karlsruhe, Karlsruhe, Germany Primary mediastinal B-cell lymphoma (PMBL) is an aggressive the expression of BSAP, BOB1, OCT2, PAX5 and PU1 was extranodal B-cell non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma with specific clin- added to the spectrum typical of PMBL features.9 ical, histopathological and genomic features. To characterize Genetically, a pattern of highly recurrent karyotype alterations further the genotype of PMBL, we analyzed 37 tumor samples and PMBL cell lines Med-B1 and Karpas1106P using array- with the hallmark of chromosomal gains of the subtelomeric based comparative genomic hybridization (matrix- or array- region of chromosome 9 supported the concept of a unique CGH) to a 2.8k genomic microarray. Due to a higher genomic disease entity that distinguishes PMBL from other B-cell non- resolution, we identified altered chromosomal regions in much Hodgkin’s lymphomas.10,11 Together with less specific gains on higher frequencies compared with standard CGH: for example, 2p15 and frequent mutations of the SOCS1 gene, a notable þ 9p24 (68%), þ 2p15 (51%), þ 7q22 (32%), þ 9q34 (32%), genomic similarity to classical Hodgkin’s lymphoma was þ 11q23 (18%), þ 12q (30%) and þ 18q21 (24%).
    [Show full text]
  • Mutant IDH, (R)-2-Hydroxyglutarate, and Cancer
    Downloaded from genesdev.cshlp.org on October 1, 2021 - Published by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press REVIEW What a difference a hydroxyl makes: mutant IDH, (R)-2-hydroxyglutarate, and cancer Julie-Aurore Losman1 and William G. Kaelin Jr.1,2,3 1Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts 02215, USA; 2Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Chevy Chase, Maryland 20815, USA Mutations in metabolic enzymes, including isocitrate whether altered cellular metabolism is a cause of cancer dehydrogenase 1 (IDH1) and IDH2, in cancer strongly or merely an adaptive response of cancer cells in the face implicate altered metabolism in tumorigenesis. IDH1 of accelerated cell proliferation is still a topic of some and IDH2 catalyze the interconversion of isocitrate and debate. 2-oxoglutarate (2OG). 2OG is a TCA cycle intermediate The recent identification of cancer-associated muta- and an essential cofactor for many enzymes, including tions in three metabolic enzymes suggests that altered JmjC domain-containing histone demethylases, TET cellular metabolism can indeed be a cause of some 5-methylcytosine hydroxylases, and EglN prolyl-4-hydrox- cancers (Pollard et al. 2003; King et al. 2006; Raimundo ylases. Cancer-associated IDH mutations alter the enzymes et al. 2011). Two of these enzymes, fumarate hydratase such that they reduce 2OG to the structurally similar (FH) and succinate dehydrogenase (SDH), are bone fide metabolite (R)-2-hydroxyglutarate [(R)-2HG]. Here we tumor suppressors, and loss-of-function mutations in FH review what is known about the molecular mechanisms and SDH have been identified in various cancers, in- of transformation by mutant IDH and discuss their im- cluding renal cell carcinomas and paragangliomas.
    [Show full text]
  • A Computational Approach for Defining a Signature of Β-Cell Golgi Stress in Diabetes Mellitus
    Page 1 of 781 Diabetes A Computational Approach for Defining a Signature of β-Cell Golgi Stress in Diabetes Mellitus Robert N. Bone1,6,7, Olufunmilola Oyebamiji2, Sayali Talware2, Sharmila Selvaraj2, Preethi Krishnan3,6, Farooq Syed1,6,7, Huanmei Wu2, Carmella Evans-Molina 1,3,4,5,6,7,8* Departments of 1Pediatrics, 3Medicine, 4Anatomy, Cell Biology & Physiology, 5Biochemistry & Molecular Biology, the 6Center for Diabetes & Metabolic Diseases, and the 7Herman B. Wells Center for Pediatric Research, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN 46202; 2Department of BioHealth Informatics, Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis, Indianapolis, IN, 46202; 8Roudebush VA Medical Center, Indianapolis, IN 46202. *Corresponding Author(s): Carmella Evans-Molina, MD, PhD ([email protected]) Indiana University School of Medicine, 635 Barnhill Drive, MS 2031A, Indianapolis, IN 46202, Telephone: (317) 274-4145, Fax (317) 274-4107 Running Title: Golgi Stress Response in Diabetes Word Count: 4358 Number of Figures: 6 Keywords: Golgi apparatus stress, Islets, β cell, Type 1 diabetes, Type 2 diabetes 1 Diabetes Publish Ahead of Print, published online August 20, 2020 Diabetes Page 2 of 781 ABSTRACT The Golgi apparatus (GA) is an important site of insulin processing and granule maturation, but whether GA organelle dysfunction and GA stress are present in the diabetic β-cell has not been tested. We utilized an informatics-based approach to develop a transcriptional signature of β-cell GA stress using existing RNA sequencing and microarray datasets generated using human islets from donors with diabetes and islets where type 1(T1D) and type 2 diabetes (T2D) had been modeled ex vivo. To narrow our results to GA-specific genes, we applied a filter set of 1,030 genes accepted as GA associated.
    [Show full text]
  • Location Analysis of Estrogen Receptor Target Promoters Reveals That
    Location analysis of estrogen receptor ␣ target promoters reveals that FOXA1 defines a domain of the estrogen response Jose´ e Laganie` re*†, Genevie` ve Deblois*, Ce´ line Lefebvre*, Alain R. Bataille‡, Franc¸ois Robert‡, and Vincent Gigue` re*†§ *Molecular Oncology Group, Departments of Medicine and Oncology, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, QC, Canada H3A 1A1; †Department of Biochemistry, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada H3G 1Y6; and ‡Laboratory of Chromatin and Genomic Expression, Institut de Recherches Cliniques de Montre´al, Montreal, QC, Canada H2W 1R7 Communicated by Ronald M. Evans, The Salk Institute for Biological Studies, La Jolla, CA, July 1, 2005 (received for review June 3, 2005) Nuclear receptors can activate diverse biological pathways within general absence of large scale functional data linking these putative a target cell in response to their cognate ligands, but how this binding sites with gene expression in specific cell types. compartmentalization is achieved at the level of gene regulation is Recently, chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) has been used poorly understood. We used a genome-wide analysis of promoter in combination with promoter or genomic DNA microarrays to occupancy by the estrogen receptor ␣ (ER␣) in MCF-7 cells to identify loci recognized by transcription factors in a genome-wide investigate the molecular mechanisms underlying the action of manner in mammalian cells (20–24). This technology, termed 17␤-estradiol (E2) in controlling the growth of breast cancer cells. ChIP-on-chip or location analysis, can therefore be used to deter- We identified 153 promoters bound by ER␣ in the presence of E2. mine the global gene expression program that characterize the Motif-finding algorithms demonstrated that the estrogen re- action of a nuclear receptor in response to its natural ligand.
    [Show full text]