DOCSLIB.ORG

Guideline Ver6.2 Se Ria L No. CAS RN® Substance Group 1 Substance

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Guideline Ver6.2 Se Ria L No. CAS RN® Substance Group 1 Substance Guideline Ver6.2 Rank CAS RN® Substance Group 1 Substance Group 2 Substance Name 1=Prohibited No. Serial 2=Reduction 1 124-73-2 ozone depleting substances(Halons) Ethane, 1,2-dibromo-1,1,2,2-tetrafluoro- 1 2 25497-30-7 ozone depleting substances(Halons) Dibromotetrafluoroethane 1 3 27336-23-8 ozone depleting substances(Halons) Dibromotetrafluoroethane,compressed 1 4 353-59-3 ozone depleting substances(Halons) Methane, bromochlorodifluoro- 1 5 354-56-3 ozone depleting substances(Halons) Ethane, pentachlorofluoro- 1 6 75-61-6 ozone depleting substances(Halons) Methane, dibromodifluoro- 1 7 75-63-8 ozone depleting substances(Halons) Methane, bromotrifluoro- 1 8 110003-27-5 ozone depleting substances(HBFCs) 1,3-dibromo-1,1,2-trifluoropropane 1 9 111483-20-6 ozone depleting substances(HBFCs) 1-bromo-2,3-difluoropropane 1 10 124-72-1 ozone depleting substances(HBFCs) 2-bromo-1,1,1,2-tetrafluoroethane 1 11 148875-95-0 ozone depleting substances(HBFCs) C3H3FBr4 1 12 148875-98-3 ozone depleting substances(HBFCs) C3H2F2Br4 1 13 1511-62-2 ozone depleting substances(HBFCs) Methane, bromodifluoro- 1 14 172912-75-3 ozone depleting substances(HBFCs) HBFC-131 B3 Tribromofluoroethane 1 15 1800-81-3 ozone depleting substances(HBFCs) 1-bromo-1,2-difluoroethane 1 16 1868-53-7 ozone depleting substances(HBFCs) Dibromofluoromethane 1 17 1871-72-3 ozone depleting substances(HBFCs) FLUOROBROMOPROPANE 1 18 2252-78-0 ozone depleting substances(HBFCs) 1-Bromo-1,1,2,3,3,3-hexafluoropropane 1 19 2252-79-1 ozone depleting substances(HBFCs) 2-bromo-1,1,1,3,3,3-hexafluoropropane 1 20 30283-90-0 ozone depleting substances(HBFCs) bromotetrafluoroethane 1 21 306-80-9 ozone depleting substances(HBFCs) 1,1,2,2-tetrabromo-1-fluoroethane 1 22 352-91-0 ozone depleting substances(HBFCs) 1-Bromo-3-fluoropropane 1 23 353-93-5 ozone depleting substances(HBFCs) C2HFBr4 1 24 353-97-9 ozone depleting substances(HBFCs) C2HF2Br3 1 25 354-04-1 ozone depleting substances(HBFCs) Ethane, 1,2-dibromo-1,1,2-trifluoro- 1 26 354-07-4 ozone depleting substances(HBFCs) 1-bromo-1,1,2,2-tetrafluoroethane 1 27 358-97-4 ozone depleting substances(HBFCs) 1,2-dibromo-1-fluoroethane 1 28 359-07-9 ozone depleting substances(HBFCs) 2-bromo-1,1-difluoroethane 1 29 373-52-4 ozone depleting substances(HBFCs) Bromofluoromethane 1 30 420-43-9 ozone depleting substances(HBFCs) 1-Bromo-1,1-difluoroethane 1 31 420-98-4 ozone depleting substances(HBFCs) 1-bromo-2,2-difluoropropane 1 32 421-06-7 ozone depleting substances(HBFCs) 2-Bromo-1,1,1-trifluoroethane 1 33 421-46-5 ozone depleting substances(HBFCs) 2-Bromo-1,1,1-trifluoropropane 1 34 422-01-5 ozone depleting substances(HBFCs) 3-bromo-1,1,1,2,2-pentafluoropropane 1 35 430-85-3 ozone depleting substances(HBFCs) 1,1-bromo-2,2-difluoroethane 1 36 431-21-0 ozone depleting substances(HBFCs) 2,3-dibromo-1,1,1-trifluoropropane 1 37 431-48-1 ozone depleting substances(HBFCs) HBFC-233 B3 Tribromotrifluoropropane 1 38 431-78-7 ozone depleting substances(HBFCs) 1,2-dibromo-1,1,3,3,3-pentafluoropropane 1 39 453-00-9 ozone depleting substances(HBFCs) C3H5FBr2 1 40 460-25-3 ozone depleting substances(HBFCs) 1,3-dibromo-1,1-difluoropropane 1 41 460-32-2 ozone depleting substances(HBFCs) 3-bromo-1,1,1-trifluoropropane 1 42 460-60-6 ozone depleting substances(HBFCs) HBFC-243 B2 Dibromotrifluoropropane 1 43 460-67-3 ozone depleting substances(HBFCs) C3H3F4Br 1 44 460-86-6 ozone depleting substances(HBFCs) 1,3-Dibromo-1,1,3,3-tetrafluoropropane 1 45 460-88-8 ozone depleting substances(HBFCs) 1-bromo-1,1,3,3,3-pentafluoroethane 1 46 461-49-4 ozone depleting substances(HBFCs) C3H5F2Br 1 47 51584-25-9 ozone depleting substances(HBFCs) HBFC-252 B2 Dibromodifluoropropane 1 48 51584-26-0 ozone depleting substances(HBFCs) 1,3-dibromo-1-fluoropropane 1 49 598-67-4 ozone depleting substances(HBFCs) TRIBROMOFLUOROETHANE 1 50 661-80-3 ozone depleting substances(HBFCs) 1,3-dibromo-1,1,2,2,3-pentafluoropropane 1 51 666-25-1 ozone depleting substances(HBFCs) 1,2,3-Tribromo-3,3-difluoropropane 1 52 666-48-8 ozone depleting substances(HBFCs) C3HF4Br3 1 53 679-84-5 ozone depleting substances(HBFCs) 3-bromo-1,1,2,2-tetrafluoropropane 1 54 679-94-7 ozone depleting substances(HBFCs) 1-bromo-1,2,2,3,3-pentafluoroethane 1 55 70192-61-9 ozone depleting substances(HBFCs) 1,1-dibromo-1,2,2,3,3-pentafluoropropane 1 56 70192-71-1 ozone depleting substances(HBFCs) 1-bromo-1,2,2,3-tetrafluoroethane 1 57 70192-73-3 ozone depleting substances(HBFCs) 1,3-dibromo-1,2,2-trifluoropropane 1 58 70192-75-5 ozone depleting substances(HBFCs) 1-bromo-2,2,3-trifluoropropane 1 59 70192-80-2 ozone depleting substances(HBFCs) tribromodifluoropropane; C3H3F2Br3 1 60 70192-83-5 ozone depleting substances(HBFCs) 1,1-dibromo-1,2,2-trifluoropropane 1 61 70192-84-6 ozone depleting substances(HBFCs) 1-bromo-1,1,2,2-tetrafluoropropane 1 62 70192-85-7 ozone depleting substances(HBFCs) 1-bromo-1,2,2-trifluoropropane 1 63 75372-14-4 ozone depleting substances(HBFCs) tribromofluoropropane; C3H4FBr3 1 64 75-82-1 ozone depleting substances(HBFCs) 1,2-Dibromo-1,1-difluoroethane 1 65 762-49-2 ozone depleting substances(HBFCs) 1-Bromo-2-fluoroethane 1 66 M-102 ozone depleting substances(HBFCs) tribromodifluoroethane; C2HF2Br3 1 67 M-103 ozone depleting substances(HBFCs) tribromofluoroethane; C2H2FBr3 1 68 M-104 ozone depleting substances(HBFCs) other bromodifluoroethane; C2H3F2Br 1 69 M-105 ozone depleting substances(HBFCs) hexabromofluoropropane; C3HFBr6 1 70 M-107 ozone depleting substances(HBFCs) tribromotetrafluoropropane; C3HF4Br3 1 71 M-108 ozone depleting substances(HBFCs) tribromotrifluoropropane; C3H2F3Br3 1 72 M-109 ozone depleting substances(HBFCs) pentabromodifluoropropane; C3HF2Br5 1 73 M-110 ozone depleting substances(HBFCs) pentabromofluoropropane; C3H2FBr5 1 74 M-111 ozone depleting substances(HBFCs) tetrabromodifluoropropane; C3H2F2Br4 1 75 M-112 ozone depleting substances(HBFCs) dibromotetrafluoropropane; C3H2F4Br2 1 76 M-113 ozone depleting substances(HBFCs) tetrabromofluoropropane; C3H3FBr4 1 77 M-114 ozone depleting substances(HBFCs) bromodifluoropropane; C3H5F2Br 1 78 M-127 ozone depleting substances(HBFCs) tetrabromotrifluoropropane; C3HF3Br4 1 79 76-11-9 ozone depleting substances(CFCs) Ethane, 1,1,1,2-tetrachloro-2,2-difluoro- 1 80 2354-05-4 ozone depleting substances(CFCs) 1,1,1,2,3-pentachloro-2,3,3-trifluoropropane 1 81 2354-06-5 ozone depleting substances(CFCs) 1,1,1,3,3-pentachloro-2,2,3-trifluoropropane 1 82 1320-37-2 ozone depleting substances(CFCs) Ethane, dichlorotetrafluoro- 1 83 134237-31-3 ozone depleting substances(CFCs) Pentachlorotrifluoropropane 1 84 135401-87-5 ozone depleting substances(CFCs) heptachlorofluoropropane 1 85 1599-41-3 ozone depleting substances(CFCs) Trichloropenthanefluoropropane 1 86 1599-43-5 ozone depleting substances(CFCs) 1,1,2,2,3-pentachloro-1,3,3-trifluoropropane 1 87 1645-71-2 ozone depleting substances(CFCs) 1,1,1,2,3,3-hexachloro-2,3-difluoropropane 1 88 1652-74-0 ozone depleting substances(CFCs) 1,1,2,3,3-pentachloro-1,2,3-trifluoropropane 1 89 1652-80-8 ozone depleting substances(CFCs) 2,2-Dichloro-1,1,1,3,3,3-hexafluoropropane 1 90 1652-81-9 ozone depleting substances(CFCs) 1,1,3-Trichloro-1,2,2,3,3-pentafluoropropane 1 91 1652-89-7 ozone depleting substances(CFCs) 1,1,1,2,2-pentachloro-3,3,3-trifluoropropane 1 92 2268-46-4 ozone depleting substances(CFCs) Propane, 1,1,1,3-tetrachloro-2,2,3,3-tetrafluoro- 1 93 26523-64-8 ozone depleting substances(CFCs) Trichlorotrifluoroethane 1 94 2729-28-4 ozone depleting substances(CFCs) 1,1-Dichloro-1,2,2,3,3,3-hexafluoropropane 1 95 28109-69-5 ozone depleting substances(CFCs) trichloropentafluoropropane 1 96 28605-74-5 ozone depleting substances(CFCs) Ethane, tetrachlorodifluoro- 1 97 29255-31-0 ozone depleting substances(CFCs) Tetrachlorotetrafluoropropane 1 98 3182-26-1 ozone depleting substances(CFCs) 1,1,1,3,3,3-HEXACHLOR-2,2-DIFLUORPROPAN 1 99 354-58-5 ozone depleting substances(CFCs) Ethane, 1,1,1-trichloro-2,2,2-trifluoro- 1 100 374-07-2 ozone depleting substances(CFCs) Ethane, 1,1-dichloro-1,2,2,2-tetrafluoro- 1 101 422-78-6 ozone depleting substances(CFCs) 1,1,1,2,2,3,3-heptachloro-3-fluoropropane 1 102 422-81-1 ozone depleting substances(CFCs) 1,1,1,2,3,3,3-heptachloro-2-fluoropropane 1 103 422-86-6 ozone depleting substances(CFCs) Propane, 1-chloro-1,1,2,2,3,3,3-heptafluoro- 1 104 42560-98-5 ozone depleting substances(CFCs) Dichlorohexafluoropropane 1 105 4259-43-2 ozone depleting substances(CFCs) Propane, 1,1,1-trichloro-2,2,2,3,3-pentafluoro- 1 106 60285-54-3 ozone depleting substances(CFCs) pentachlorotrifluoropropane 1 107 661-96-1 ozone depleting substances(CFCs) 1,1,1,2,2,3-hexachloro-3,3-difluoropropane 1 108 661-97-2 ozone depleting substances(CFCs) Propane, 1,2-dichloro-1,1,2,3,3,3-hexafluoro- 1 109 662-01-1 ozone depleting substances(CFCs) 1,3-Dichloro-1,1,2,2,3,3-hexafluoropropane 1 110 75-69-4 ozone depleting substances(CFCs) Methane, trichlorofluoro- 1 Guideline Ver6.2 Rank CAS RN® Substance Group 1 Substance Group 2 Substance Name 1=Prohibited No. Serial 2=Reduction 111 75-71-8 ozone depleting substances(CFCs) Methane, dichlorodifluoro- 1 112 75-72-9 ozone depleting substances(CFCs) Methane, chlorotrifluoro- 1 113 76-12-0 ozone depleting substances(CFCs) Ethane, 1,1,2,2-tetrachloro-1,2-difluoro- 1 114 76-13-1 ozone depleting substances(CFCs) Ethane, 1,1,2-trichloro-1,2,2-trifluoro- 1 115 76-14-2 ozone depleting substances(CFCs) Ethane, 1,2-dichloro-1,1,2,2-tetrafluoro- 1 116 76-15-3 ozone depleting substances(CFCs) Ethane, chloropentafluoro- 1 117 76-17-5 ozone depleting substances(CFCs)
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Toxicity of Pyrethorids Co-Administered with Sesame Oil Against Housefly Musca Domestica L
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURE & BIOLOGY 1560–8530/2007/09–5–782–784 http://www.fspublishers.org Toxicity of Pyrethorids Co-administered with Sesame Oil against Housefly Musca domestica L. SOHAIL AHMED1 AND MUHAMMAD IRFANULLAH Department of Agri-Entomology, University of Agriculture, Faisalabad–38040, Pakistan 1Corresponding author’s e-mail: [email protected] ABSTRACT The susceptibility of a laboratory reared strain of Musca domestica L. to cypermethrin 10 EC, fenpropathrin 20 EC, fenvalerate 20 EC and lambda cyhalothrin 2.5 EC, at different ranges of concentrations (250 to 2500 ppm) of the formulated insecticides in acetone alone and in combination with sesame oil in 1:1 and 1:2 ratio of insecticide: sesame oil was investigated. These concentrations in a volume of 5 mL were added to 25 g of granulated sugar in a petridish. House flies were fed on the insecticide coated sugar for 48 h. Knockdown and mortality data were recorded after 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, 24 and 48 h and subjected to probit analysis. KD50 values of cypermethrin, lambda-cyhalothrin, fenpropathrin and fenvalerate in 1:1 ratio with sesame oil were 4297, 17188, 2324 and 8487 ppm, respectively as compared to 1915, 15034, 2608 and 4005 ppm respectively when these insecticides were applied alone. Similar fashion was seen in context of LC50 values. The pyrethroid + sesame oil combination in two ratios does not show the synergism in M. domestica. Key Words: M. domestica; Pyrethroids; Synergist; Sesame oil INTRODUCTION conventional insecticides as well as against cotton aphid (Aphis gossypii Glover) (Moore, 2005). Sesamin, a lignan Housefly (Musca domestica L.) causes a serious threat occurring in sesame’s seed oil has been reported as synergist to human and livestock health by transmitting many insecticide, antisseptic, bactericide (Bedigian et al., 1985).
    [Show full text]
  • Insecticide Residue Analyses in Cucumbers Sampled from Çanakkale Open Markets1 Çanakkale Açık Pazarlarından Örneklenen Hıyarlarda Insektisit Kalıntı Analizleri
    Türk. entomol. derg., 2020, 44 (4): 449-460 ISSN 1010-6960 DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.16970/entoted.767482 E-ISSN 2536-491X Original article (Orijinal araştırma) Insecticide residue analyses in cucumbers sampled from Çanakkale open markets1 Çanakkale açık pazarlarından örneklenen hıyarlarda insektisit kalıntı analizleri Hayriye ÇATAK2 Osman TİRYAKİ3* Abstract The aim of this study was to investigate four insecticide residues in cucumbers with the aid of QuEChERS 2007.1 method. For method verification assessment, pesticide-free cucumber matrix was spiked with 0.1, 1 and 10 times of MRL for each pesticide. The QuEChERS-LC-MS/MS analytical method revealed that the detection limits of the insecticides were below the MRLs and the overall recovery of method was 97.7%. These figures were within the SANTE recovery limits (60-140%) and the values specified for the repeatability (≤20%). Cucumbers were collected from six different stands (A-F) at Çanakkale open markets for 6 weeks between 23 November and 28 December 2018. Residues of each sampling time and each stand were assessed. Acetamiprid residue of 257g and 236 µg/kg were detected in week 5 from stand B and in week 2 from stand E, respectively. These values are close to MRL (300 µg/kg). Formetanate hydrochloride residue of the week 3 from stand F (36.3 µg/kg) was more than MRL of 10 µg/kg. Pirimiphos methyl and chlorpyrifos residues were not detected in cucumbers. Theoretical maximum daily intake assessment showed that there was no chronic exposure risk for these four pesticides through cucumber consumption. Keywords: Cucumber, insecticide residues, QuEChERS, risk assessment, toxicology Öz Bu çalışma hıyarlarda dört insektisit kalıntısını QuEChERS 2007.1 yöntemi ile belirlemek amacıyla yapılmıştır.
    [Show full text]
  • Monitoring of Pesticide Residues in Commonly Used Fruits and Vegetables in Kuwait
    International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health Article Monitoring of Pesticide Residues in Commonly Used Fruits and Vegetables in Kuwait Mustapha F. A. Jallow *, Dawood G. Awadh, Mohammed S. Albaho, Vimala Y. Devi and Nisar Ahmad Environment and Life Sciences Research Center, Kuwait Institute for Scientific Research, P.O. Box 24885, Safat 13109, Kuwait; [email protected] (D.G.A.); [email protected] (M.S.A.); [email protected] (V.Y.D.); [email protected] (N.A.) * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +965-249-8984 Received: 1 May 2017; Accepted: 12 July 2017; Published: 25 July 2017 Abstract: The presence of pesticide residues in primary and derived agricultural products raises serious health concerns for consumers. The aim of this study was to assess the level of pesticide residues in commonly consumed fruits and vegetables in Kuwait. A total of 150 samples of different fresh vegetables and fruits were analyzed for the presence of 34 pesticides using the quick easy cheap effective rugged and safe (QuEChERS) multi-residue extraction, followed by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS) or liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS). Pesticide residues above the maximum residue limits (MRL) were detected in 21% of the samples and 79% of the samples had no residues of the pesticides surveyed or contained residues below the MRL. Multiple residues were present in 40% of the samples with two to four pesticides, and four samples were contaminated with more than four pesticide residues. Of the pesticides investigated, 16 were detected, of which imidacloprid, deltamethrin, cypermethrin, malathion, acetamiprid, monocrotophos, chlorpyrifos-methyl, and diazinon exceeded their MRLs.
    [Show full text]
  • Characterization of Residential Pest Control Products Used in Inner City Communities in New York City
    Journal of Exposure Science and Environmental Epidemiology (2010), 1–11 r 2010 Nature America, Inc. All rights reserved 1559-0631/10 www.nature.com/jes Characterization of residential pest control products used in inner city communities in New York City MEGAN K. HORTONa, J. BRYAN JACOBSONb, WENDY MCKELVEYb, DARRELL HOLMESa, BETTY FINCHERc, AUDREY QUANTANOc, BEINVENDIDA PAEZ DIAZc, FAYE SHABBAZZc, PEGGY SHEPARDc, ANDREW RUNDLEa AND ROBIN M. WHYATTa aColumbia Center for Children’s Environmental Health, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, New York, USA bNew York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene, New York, New York, USA cWest Harlem Environmental Action, New York, New York, USA The Columbia Center for Children’s Environmental Health (CCCEH) previously reported widespread residential insecticide use in urban communities in New York City. Research suggests that pyrethroids are replacing organophosphates (OPs) in response to 2000–2001 US EPA pesticide regulations restricting OP use. A systematic assessment of active ingredients used for residential pest control is lacking. We queried a database of pesticide applications reported by licensed applicators between 1999 and 2005 and surveyed pest control products available in 145 stores within 29 zip codes in the CCCEH catchment area including Northern Manhattan and the South Bronx. Pyrethroids, pyrethrins, piperonyl butoxide, and hydramethylnon were the most common insecticide active ingredients reported as used by licensed pesticide applicators within the 29 zip codes of the CCCEH catchment area between 1999 and 2005. Use of certain pyrethroids and some non-spray insecticides such as fipronil and boric acid increased significantly by year (logistic regression, OR41.0, Po0.05), whereas use of OPs, including chlorpyrifos and diazinon decreased significantly by year (logistic regression, ORo1.0, Po0.05).
    [Show full text]
  • Carpenter Ants and Control in Homes Page 1 of 6
    Carpenter Ants and Control in Homes Page 1 of 6 Carpenter Ants and Control in Homes Fact Sheet No. 31 Revised May 2000 Dr. Jay B Karren, Extension Entomologist Alan H. Roe, Insect Diagnostician Introduction Carpenter ants are members of the insect order Hymenoptera, which includes bees, wasps, sawflies, and other ants. Carpenter ants can be occasional pests in the home and are noted particularly for the damage they can cause when nesting in wood. In Utah they are more of a nuisance rather than a major structural pest. Carpenter ants, along with a number of other ant species, utilize cavities in wood, particularly stumps and logs in decayed condition, as nesting sites. They are most abundant in forests and can be easily found under loose bark of dead trees, stumps, or fallen logs. Homeowners may bring them into their homes when they transport infested logs from forests to use as firewood. Description Carpenter ants include species that are among the largest ants found in the United States. They are social insects with a complex and well-defined caste system. The worker ants are sterile females and may occur in different sizes (majors and minors). Members of the reproductive caste (fertile males and females) are usually winged prior to mating. All ants develop from eggs deposited by a fertilized female (queen). The eggs hatch into grub-like larvae (immatures) which are fed and cared for by the workers. When fully grown, the larvae spin a cocoon and enter the pupal stage. The pupal stage is a period of transformation from the larva to adult.
    [Show full text]
  • Pesticide Safety & Pesticide Categories
    Pesticide Safety & Pesticide Categories Janet Hurley, & Don Renchie Texas A&M AgriLife Extension Service School IPM What is a pesticide • Any substance or mixture of substances intended for preventing, destroying, repelling, or mitigating any pest. • Any substance or mixture of substances intended for use as a plant regulator, defoliant, or desiccant. • Any nitrogen stabilizer. • A product is likely to be a pesticide if the labeling or advertising: • Makes a claim to prevent, kill, destroy, mitigate, remove, repel or any other similar action against any pest. • Indirectly states or implies an action against a pest. • Draws a comparison to a pesticide. • Pictures a pest on the label. Not considered pesticides Drugs used to control the diseases of humans or animals, which are regulated by the FDA Fertilizers and soil nutrients Certain low-risk substances such as cedar chips, garlic and mint oil are exempted from regulation by EPA (requires license) • 25b classification requires no signal word (mostly food-safe compounds) Pest control devices (i.e., mousetraps) are not pesticides, but subject to labeling requirements There are many kinds of pesticides How insecticides work: Modes of action • Nervous system poisons • Acts on the nerve • Metabolic inhibitors • Affect ability of target to process food • Hormone mimics • Disrupt normal growth & reproduction • Physical poisons • Physically damage insect • Repellents & attractants • All products have been assigned to groups based on their mode of Mode of action: • i.e. pyrethroids are Group 3; Action Neonicotinoids are Group 4A, Spinosad is Group 5, Diamides Classification are Group 28 • Product labels include the number corresponding to the mode of action group.
    [Show full text]
  • EUPT-CF10-Webinar
    Results of EUPT-CF10 Incurred and spiked pesticides in rye Mette Erecius Poulsen Holte, 20 September 2016 PTs on cereals/feed 2016 EUPT-CF10 Test material Rye flour Participants 178 (160) Compulsory target pesticides 134 Voluntary target pesticides 7 Incurred pesticides 10 Spiked pesticides 8 Total no. of pesticides 18 National Food Institute, Technical University of Denmark Advisory Group Quality Group Amadeo R. Fernández-Alba Antonio Valverde André de Kok Stewart Reynolds Antonio Valverde Magnus Jezussek Michelangelo Anastassiades Miguel Gamón Organising team at EURL Philippe Gros Mette Erecius Poulsen Ralf Lippold Susan Strange Herrmann Sonja Masselter Parvaneh Hajeb Stewart Reynolds Merete B. Ludwigsen Tuija Pihlström Lisbet Pilhkjær Finbarr Oregan Jens-Ole Frimann National Food Institute, Technical University of Denmark National Food Institute, Technical University of Denmark Activity Dates Announcement Calendar December 2015 Target Pesticide List EUPT-Registration Website 11 January 2016 Deadline for registration 1 February 2016 Release of Specific Protocol 29 February 2016 Distribution of Test items 7 March 2016 Deadline for Receipt and Acceptance of Test Materials within 24 hr on reciept 11 April 2016 Deadline for Result Submission at 13.00 CET Deadline for submission of additional method information for 15 April 2015 false negative results Preliminary Report (only compilation of results) 30 May 2015 Final Report December 2015 National Food Institute, Technical University of Denmark Target list - new pesticides and voluntary compounds
    [Show full text]
  • Historical Perspectives on Apple Production: Fruit Tree Pest Management, Regulation and New Insecticidal Chemistries
    Historical Perspectives on Apple Production: Fruit Tree Pest Management, Regulation and New Insecticidal Chemistries. Peter Jentsch Extension Associate Department of Entomology Cornell University's Hudson Valley Lab 3357 Rt. 9W; PO box 727 Highland, NY 12528 email: [email protected] Phone 845-691-7151 Mobile: 845-417-7465 http://www.nysaes.cornell.edu/ent/faculty/jentsch/ 2 Historical Perspectives on Fruit Production: Fruit Tree Pest Management, Regulation and New Chemistries. by Peter Jentsch I. Historical Use of Pesticides in Apple Production Overview of Apple Production and Pest Management Prior to 1940 Synthetic Pesticide Development and Use II. Influences Changing the Pest Management Profile in Apple Production Chemical Residues in Early Insect Management Historical Chemical Regulation Recent Regulation Developments Changing Pest Management Food Quality Protection Act of 1996 The Science Behind The Methodology Pesticide Revisions – Requirements For New Registrations III. Resistance of Insect Pests to Insecticides Resistance Pest Management Strategies IV. Reduced Risk Chemistries: New Modes of Action and the Insecticide Treadmill Fermentation Microbial Products Bt’s, Abamectins, Spinosads Juvenile Hormone Analogs Formamidines, Juvenile Hormone Analogs And Mimics Insect Growth Regulators Azadirachtin, Thiadiazine Neonicotinyls Major Reduced Risk Materials: Carboxamides, Carboxylic Acid Esters, Granulosis Viruses, Diphenyloxazolines, Insecticidal Soaps, Benzoyl Urea Growth Regulators, Tetronic Acids, Oxadiazenes , Particle Films, Phenoxypyrazoles, Pyridazinones, Spinosads, Tetrazines , Organotins, Quinolines. 3 I Historical Use of Pesticides in Apple Production Overview of Apple Production and Pest Management Prior to 1940 The apple has a rather ominous origin. Its inception is framed in the biblical text regarding the genesis of mankind. The backdrop appears to be the turbulent setting of what many scholars believe to be present day Iraq.
    [Show full text]
  • Mode of Action Classification
    Gr oup 15: Inhibitors of chitin biosynthe si s, type 0 (Only m ajor r epr esentatives of the gr oup ar e shown) Gr oup 1: Acetylcholi ne st er a se (AChE) inhibitors (Only major representatives of the groups are shown) Mode of Action Classification Flufenoxuron No v a l u ro n Triflumuron Ac ephate Me t h a mi d o p h o s Aldic arb Ox a my l Di fl u b e n z u ron Lufenuron Teflubenzuron 15 Benz oy lur eas Me t h i o c a r b Fenitrothion Gr oup 16: Inhibitors of Gr oup 17: Moulting Gr oup 18: Ecdysone r eceptor agonists Thiodicarb Ch l o rp y ri fo s Ca rb a ry l Profenofos chitin biosynthesis, disr uptor , D ipter an type 1 Me t h o my l Ma l a t h i o n Insecticide Resistance Action Committee Pirimic arb Di meth o a te Ch ro mafe n o z i d e Ca rb o fu ra n Triazophos Me t h o x y f e n o z id e 1A Carbamates 1B Organophosphates The Key to Resistance Management Buprofez in Cy ro maz i n e 18 Diacyl- Ha l o fe n o z i d e Tebufenozide Ø Successive generations of a pest should not be treated with compounds from the same MoA Gr oup. 16 Buprofezin 17 Cyromazine hydrazines Gr oup 2: GABA-gated chlor ide channel antagonis ts Ø Not all of the cur r ent gr oupings ar e based on knowledg e of a shar ed tar get pr otein.
    [Show full text]
  • Manual for Certificate Course on Plant Protection & Pesticide Management
    Manual for Certificate Course on Plant Protection & Pesticide Management (for Pesticide Dealers) For Internal circulation only & has no legal validity Compiled by NIPHM Faculty Department of Agriculture , Cooperation& Farmers Welfare Ministry of Agriculture and Farmers Welfare Government of India National Institute of Plant Health Management Hyderabad-500030 TABLE OF CONTENTS Theory Practical CHAPTER Page No. class hours hours I. General Overview and Classification of Pesticides. 1. Introduction to classification based on use, 1 1 2 toxicity, chemistry 2. Insecticides 5 1 0 3. fungicides 9 1 0 4. Herbicides & Plant growth regulators 11 1 0 5. Other Pesticides (Acaricides, Nematicides & 16 1 0 rodenticides) II. Pesticide Act, Rules and Regulations 1. Introduction to Insecticide Act, 1968 and 19 1 0 Insecticide rules, 1971 2. Registration and Licensing of pesticides 23 1 0 3. Insecticide Inspector 26 2 0 4. Insecticide Analyst 30 1 4 5. Importance of packaging and labelling 35 1 0 6. Role and Responsibilities of Pesticide Dealer 37 1 0 under IA,1968 III. Pesticide Application A. Pesticide Formulation 1. Types of pesticide Formulations 39 3 8 2. Approved uses and Compatibility of pesticides 47 1 0 B. Usage Recommendation 1. Major pest and diseases of crops: identification 50 3 3 2. Principles and Strategies of Integrated Pest 80 2 1 Management & The Concept of Economic Threshold Level 3. Biological control and its Importance in Pest 93 1 2 Management C. Pesticide Application 1. Principles of Pesticide Application 117 1 0 2. Types of Sprayers and Dusters 121 1 4 3. Spray Nozzles and Their Classification 130 1 0 4.
    [Show full text]
  • INDEX to PESTICIDE TYPES and FAMILIES and PART 180 TOLERANCE INFORMATION of PESTICIDE CHEMICALS in FOOD and FEED COMMODITIES
    US Environmental Protection Agency Office of Pesticide Programs INDEX to PESTICIDE TYPES and FAMILIES and PART 180 TOLERANCE INFORMATION of PESTICIDE CHEMICALS in FOOD and FEED COMMODITIES Note: Pesticide tolerance information is updated in the Code of Federal Regulations on a weekly basis. EPA plans to update these indexes biannually. These indexes are current as of the date indicated in the pdf file. For the latest information on pesticide tolerances, please check the electronic Code of Federal Regulations (eCFR) at http://www.access.gpo.gov/nara/cfr/waisidx_07/40cfrv23_07.html 1 40 CFR Type Family Common name CAS Number PC code 180.163 Acaricide bridged diphenyl Dicofol (1,1-Bis(chlorophenyl)-2,2,2-trichloroethanol) 115-32-2 10501 180.198 Acaricide phosphonate Trichlorfon 52-68-6 57901 180.259 Acaricide sulfite ester Propargite 2312-35-8 97601 180.446 Acaricide tetrazine Clofentezine 74115-24-5 125501 180.448 Acaricide thiazolidine Hexythiazox 78587-05-0 128849 180.517 Acaricide phenylpyrazole Fipronil 120068-37-3 129121 180.566 Acaricide pyrazole Fenpyroximate 134098-61-6 129131 180.572 Acaricide carbazate Bifenazate 149877-41-8 586 180.593 Acaricide unclassified Etoxazole 153233-91-1 107091 180.599 Acaricide unclassified Acequinocyl 57960-19-7 6329 180.341 Acaricide, fungicide dinitrophenol Dinocap (2, 4-Dinitro-6-octylphenyl crotonate and 2,6-dinitro-4- 39300-45-3 36001 octylphenyl crotonate} 180.111 Acaricide, insecticide organophosphorus Malathion 121-75-5 57701 180.182 Acaricide, insecticide cyclodiene Endosulfan 115-29-7 79401
    [Show full text]
  • A Pesticide Decision-Making Guide to Protect Pollinators in Landscape
    A Pesticide Decision-Making Guide to Protect Pollinators in Landscape, Ornamental and Turf Management 2019 Edition By Maria van Dyke, Emma Mullen, Dan Wixted, and Scott McArt Pollinator Network at Cornell, 2018 Cornell University, Department Of Entomology Download this guide for free from: https://pollinator.cals.cornell.edu/resources/grower-resources/ Contents Choosing lower-risk pesticides for pollinators in landscape, ornamental & turf management ____ 1 How to use this guide 3 Understanding the terms in this guide 4 EPA Pesticide toxicity standards 4 Synergistic Interactions 4 Systemic Pesticides 4 Adjuvants and/or inert ingredients 5 Tying it all together: adopting an Integrated Pest and Pollinator Management (IPPM) approach 5 IPPM: Putting the “pollinator” in IPM: 6 Table 1: Product formulations and their active ingredients 7 Table 2: Pesticide synergies and acute, chronic, and sublethal toxicities for honey bees and other pollinators 10 Literature cited 25 Appendix A: Pollination contract ______________________________________________________ 29 Acknowledgments This research and development of this guide was supported by the New York State Environmental Protection Fund and New York Farm Viability Institute grant FOC 17-001. The expert advice and consultation provided by Dan Wixted of the Cornell Pesticide Management Education Program was supported by the Crop Protection and Pest Management Extension Implementation Program [grant no. 2017-70006-27142/project accession no. 1014000] from the USDA National Institute of Food and Agriculture. 1 Choosing lower-risk pesticides for pollinators in landscape, ornamental & turf management Managing pests on ornamentals, in landscapes, and in nurseries while protecting pollinators can be a balancing act. Pollinators (mostly bees) are busy pollinating blossoms in nurseries and landscapes at the same time growers and landscapers need to be managing specific pests and diseases.
    [Show full text]