Federal Register/Vol. 65, No. 88/Friday, May 5, 2000/Rules And

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Federal Register/Vol. 65, No. 88/Friday, May 5, 2000/Rules And 26438 Federal Register / Vol. 65, No. 88 / Friday, May 5, 2000 / Rules and Regulations DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR (in)) in length. A mature fish weighs 1 additional shovelnose sturgeon to 2 kilograms (kg) (2 to 4 pounds (lb)). specimens from a larger geographic area. Fish and Wildlife Service The head is broad and flattened shovel- Mayden and Kuhajda (1996) identified like at the snout. The mouth is tubular eight new diagnostic characters, found 50 CFR Part 17 and protrusive. There are four barbels little evidence of geographic clinal RIN 1018±AF56 (whisker-like appendages used to find variation in these diagnostic features, prey) on the bottom of the snout, in and concluded that the Alabama Endangered and Threatened Wildlife front of the mouth. Bony plates cover sturgeon was a distinct and valid and Plants; Final Rule To List the the head, back, and sides. The body species. Alabama Sturgeon as Endangered narrows abruptly to the rear, forming a Attempts to clarify taxonomic narrow stalk between the body and tail. relationships of the Alabama sturgeon to AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service, The upper lobe of the tail fin is other species of Scaphirhynchus using Interior. elongated and ends in a long filament. DNA sequencing have met with limited ACTION: Final rule. Characters used to distinguish the success. In an unpublished report, Alabama sturgeon from the closely Schill and Walker (1994) used tissue SUMMARY: We, the Fish and Wildlife related shovelnose sturgeon samples from an Alabama sturgeon Service (Service), determine the (Scaphirhynchus platorynchus) include collected in 1993 to compare the three Alabama sturgeon (Scaphirhynchus larger eyes, orange color, number of nominal Scaphirhynchus species. Based suttkusi) to be endangered under the dorsal plates, dorsal fin ray numbers, on estimates of sequence divergence at authority of the Endangered Species Act and the absence of spines on the tip of the mitochondrial cytochrome b locus, of 1973, as amended (Act). The Alabama its snout and in front of its eyes. Alabama, shovelnose, and pallid sturgeon's historic range once included The earliest specimens of Alabama sturgeons (S. albus) were about 1,600 kilometers (km) (1,000 sturgeon in museum collections date indistinguishable. However, other miles (mi)) of the Mobile River system from about 1880. The first mention of studies have also found that the in Alabama (Black Warrior, Tombigbee, the fish in the scientific literature, cytochrome b locus was not useful for Alabama, Coosa, Tallapoosa, Mobile, however, was not until 1955, when a discriminating among some congeneric Tensaw, and Cahaba Rivers) and report of the collection of a single fish species that were otherwise Mississippi (Tombigbee River). Since specimen from the Tombigbee River was distinguished by accepted 1985, all confirmed captures have been published by Chermock. In 1976, morphological, behavioral, and other from a short, free-flowing reach of the Ramsey referred to the Alabama characteristics (Campton et al. 1995). Alabama River below Millers Ferry and sturgeon as the Alabama shovelnose In two unpublished reports for the Claiborne Locks and Dams in Clarke, sturgeon, noting that it probably was U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Corps) Monroe, and Wilcox Counties, Alabama. distinct from the shovelnose sturgeon, and us by Genetic Analyses, Inc. (1994, The decline of the Alabama sturgeon is which is found in the Mississippi River 1995), nuclear DNA fragments were attributed to over-fishing, loss and Basin and was also historically known compared among the three fragmentation of habitat as a result of from the Rio Grande. In 1991, Williams Scaphirhynchus species. The three historical navigation-related and Clemmer formally described the Alabama sturgeon specimens examined development, and water quality species based on a statistical were genetically divergent from pallid degradation. Current threats primarily comparison of relative sizes and and shovelnose sturgeons, while there result from its reduced range and its numbers of morphological structures of were no observed differences of DNA small population numbers. These Alabama and shovelnose sturgeons. fragments between the pallid and threats are compounded by a lack of The methods used by Williams and shovelnose sturgeons. However, the information on Alabama sturgeon Clemmer (1991) to justify species 1995 study also found that two of the habitat and life history requirements. designation for the Alabama sturgeon Alabama sturgeon differed substantially This action extends the Act's protection have been criticized in unpublished from the third, noted the small number to the Alabama sturgeon. manuscripts (e.g., Blanchard and of samples of Alabama sturgeon, and EFFECTIVE DATE: June 5, 2000. Bartolucci 1994, Howell et al. 1995) and recommended additional studies to in one published paper (Mayden and examine genetic diversity within the ADDRESSES: The complete file for this Kuhajda 1996). The criticisms included Alabama sturgeon population. rule is available for inspection, by identification of a variety of statistical A comparative study of the appointment, during normal business and methodological errors and mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) d-loop of hours at the Mississippi Field Office, limitations (e.g., small sample size, Scaphirhynchus species by Campton et U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, 6578 clinal variation (characteristics of a al. (1995) provided genetic data Dogwood View Parkway, Jackson, species correlated with changing consistent with the taxonomic Mississippi 39213. ecological variables), allometric growth distinction of the Alabama sturgeon FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Paul (growth of parts of an organism at from the shovelnose sturgeon. The d- Hartfield at the above address different rates and at different times), loop is considered to be a rapidly (telephone 601/321±1125; facsimile inappropriate statistical tests, and evolving part of the genome. Campton et 601/965±4340). others). Bartolucci et al. (1998), using al. (1995) found that haplotype (genetic SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Bayesian Analysis statistical markers) frequencies of the d-loop from methodology, found no significant the three Scaphirhynchus species were Background differences in multivariate means of significantly different, with the Alabama The Alabama sturgeon measurement data, taken from Williams sturgeon having a unique haplotype. (Scaphirhynchus suttkusi) is a small, and Clemmer (1991). However, the relative genetic freshwater sturgeon that was historically Mayden and Kuhajda (1996) differences among the three species found only in the Mobile River Basin of reevaluated the morphological were small, suggesting that the rate of Alabama and Mississippi. This sturgeon distinctiveness of the Alabama sturgeon genetic change in the genus is relatively is an elongate, slender fish growing to using improved statistical tests and new slow and/or they have only recently about 80 centimeters (cm) (31 inches data derived from examination of diverged. The genetic similarity VerDate 27<APR>2000 16:18 May 04, 2000 Jkt 190000 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\05MYR2.SGM pfrm02 PsN: 05MYR2 Federal Register / Vol. 65, No. 88 / Friday, May 5, 2000 / Rules and Regulations 26439 between the pallid and shovelnose Clemmer 1991). Examination of stomach uncommon; however, by the 1970s, it sturgeon has been suggested to be due contents of museum and captured had become rare. In 1976, Ramsey to interbreeding that has recently specimens show that these sturgeon are considered the sturgeon as endangered occurred as a result of niche overlap opportunistic bottom feeders, preying and documented only six specimens resulting from widespread habitat losses primarily on aquatic insect larvae from museums. Clemmer (1983) was (Carlson et al. 1985, Keenlyne et al. (Mayden and Kuhajda 1996). Mayden able to locate 23 Alabama sturgeon 1994). and Kuhajda (1996) deduced other specimens in museum collections, with During open comment periods for the aspects of Alabama sturgeon life history the most recent collection dated 1977. proposed rule, we received several by a review of spawning habits of its Clemmer also found that commercial reports and letters containing new data better known congener (a species that is fishermen in the Alabama and from mtDNA analysis of a member of the same genus), the Tombigbee Rivers were familiar with Scaphirhynchus. Both Campton et al. shovelnose sturgeon. Life history of the the sturgeon, calling it hackleback, (1999) and Mayden et al. (1999) shovelnose sturgeon has also been buglemouth trout, or devilfish. identified a haplotype common to the recently summarized by Keenlyne During the mid-1980s, Burke and three Alabama sturgeon sampled that (1997). These data indicate that Ramsey (1985, 1995) conducted a status was not observed in a much larger Alabama sturgeon are likely to migrate survey to determine the distribution and sample (>70) of pallid and shovelnose upstream during late winter and spring abundance of the Alabama sturgeon. sturgeons. Wells (in litt. 1999) also to spawn. Downstream migrations may Interviews were conducted with conducted mtDNA analysis on eight occur to search for feeding areas and/or commercial fishermen on the Alabama shovelnose sturgeon and identified deeper, cooler waters during the and Cahaba Rivers, some of whom several new haplotypes not found in summer. Eggs are probably deposited on reported catch of Alabama sturgeon as previous studies. He did not find the hard bottom substrates such as bedrock,
Recommended publications
  • Pallid Sturgeon Recovery Plan (Recovery Plan)
    PALLID STURGEON coRE VERYPMN Recovery Plan for the Pallid Sturgeon (Scaphirhynchus a/bus) Prepared by the Pallid Sturgeon Recovery Team Principal Authors Mark P. Dryer, Leader U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Ecological Services 1500 Capitol Avenue Bismarck, ND 58501 and Alan J. Sandvol U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Fisheries and Federal Aid 1500 Capitol Avenue Bismarck, ND 58501 for Region 6 U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Denver, Colorado / Approved: Re~5l i rector Date TABLE OF CONTENTS TITLE PAGE RECOVERY BACKGROUND AND STRATEGY iii PALLID STURGEON RECOVERY TEAM iv DISCLAIMER V ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS vi EXECUTIVE SUMMARY vii Part I INTRODUCTION 1 History 1 General Description 1 Historical Distribution and Abundance 3 Present Distribution and Abundance 5 Habitat Preference 5 Current Velocity 7 Turbidity 8 Water Depth 8 Substrate 8 Temperature 8 Life History 8 Reproductive Biology 8 Food and Feeding Habits 9 Age and Growth 10 Reasons for Decline 10 Habitat Loss 10 Commercial Harvest 13 Pall uti on/Contami nants 14 Hybridization 14 Part II RECOVERY 16 Recovery Objectives and Criteria 16 Recovery—Priority Management Areas 16 Recovery Outline 19 24 Recovery Outline Narrative . LITERATURE CITED 42 Part III IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE 46 FIGURES NO. PAGE 1. Comparative Diagrams of the Ventral Surface of the Head of Shovelnose Sturgeon and Pallid Sturgeon, Showing Several Measurement Ratios of Value for Identification 2 2. Historic Range of Pallid Sturgeon 4 3. Recent Occurrence of Pallid Sturgeon 6 4. Recovery—Priority Management Areas 18 RECOVERY BACKGROUND AND STRATEGY The pallid sturgeon (Scaphirhynchus albus Forbes and Richardson) was listed as an endangered species on September 6, 1990 (55 FR 36641) pursuant to the Endangered Species Act (Act) of 1973 (16 U.S.C.
    [Show full text]
  • Yangtze Sturgeon (Acipenser Dabryanus) - Sturgeons
    Pond Life - Yangtze Sturgeon (Acipenser dabryanus) - Sturgeons http://www.pond-life.me.uk/sturgeon/acipenserdabryanus.php Search Pond Life... Home Sturgeons Koi Other Fish Fish Health Ponds Plants Forums Contents Yangtze Sturgeon (Acipenser dabryanus) Home Sturgeons Acipenseriformes Sturgeon Food & Feeding Sturgeon Care Sheet Sturgeon Guide Sturgeon Species List Adriatic Sturgeon Alabama Sturgeon Amu Darya Sturgeon Amur Sturgeon Atlantic Sturgeon Beluga Sturgeon Chinese Paddlefish Chinese Sturgeon Yangtze Sturgeon (Acipenser dabryanus) photo from the website of CAFS Common Sturgeon (http://zzzy.fishinfo.cn/) Diamond Sturgeon Dwarf Sturgeon by Karen Paul Green Sturgeon Description: The Yangtze Sturgeon (Acipenser dabryanus) has 8-13 dorsal scutes, 26-39 lateral Gulf Sturgeon scutes, 9-13 ventral scutes, 44-57 dorsal fin rays and 25-36 anal fin rays. Colouration ranges from Kaluga Sturgeon dark grey to brown-grey on the back to white on the ventral side. The body is rough because it is Lake Sturgeon covered with small pointed denticles. The four barbels are located closer to the mouth than the end Paddlefish of the snout. The Yangtze Sturgeon can reach 1.3 meters in length and a weight of 16kg. Pallid Sturgeon Persian Sturgeon Sakhalin Sturgeon Ship Sturgeon Shortnose Sturgeon Shovelnose Sturgeon Siberian Sturgeon Stellate Sturgeon Sterlet Syr Darya Sturgeon White Sturgeon Yangtze Sturgeon Sturgeon Videos Koi Other Fish Fish Health Yangtze Sturgeon (Acipenser dabryanus) photo from the website of CAFS Ponds (http://zzzy.fishinfo.cn/) Plants Forums Wild Distribution: Asia; restricted to the upper and middle reaches of the Yangtze River system, Search rarely seen below the Gezhouba Dam. The Yangtze Sturgeon is a potamodromous (freshwater only) species.
    [Show full text]
  • US Fish & Wildlife Service Revised
    U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service Revised RECOVERY PLAN for the Pallid Sturgeon (Scaphirhynchus albus) Original Plan Approved: November 1993 Prepared by: Pallid Sturgeon Recovery Coordinator U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Montana Fish and Wildlife Conservation Office Billings, Montana For Mountain-Prairie Region U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Denver, CO January 2014 DISCLAIMER Recovery plans delineate reasonable actions that are believed necessary to recover and/or protect listed species. Plans are prepared by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, sometimes with the assistance of recovery teams, contractors, State agencies, and others. Plans are reviewed by the public and subject to additional peer review before they are adopted by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. Objectives will only be attained and funds expended contingent upon appropriations, priorities, and other budgetary constraints. Recovery plans do not obligate other parties to undertake specific tasks. Recovery plans do not necessarily represent the views nor the official positions or approval of any individuals or agencies involved in the plan formulation, other than the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. They represent the official position of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service only after they have been signed by the Regional Director or Director as approved. Approved recovery plans are subject to modification as dictated by new findings, changes in species’ status, and the completion of recovery tasks. Copies of all documents reviewed in development of the plan are available in the administrative record, located at the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service’s Montana Fish and Wildlife Conservation Office, Billings, Montana.
    [Show full text]
  • Caviar and Conservation
    Caviar and Conservation Status, Management, and Trade of North American Sturgeon and Paddlefish Douglas F.Williamson May 2003 TRAFFIC North America World Wildlife Fund 1250 24th Street NW Washington DC 20037 Visit www.traffic.org for an electronic edition of this report, and for more information about TRAFFIC North America. © 2003 WWF. All rights reserved by World Wildlife Fund, Inc. All material appearing in this publication is copyrighted and may be reproduced with permission. Any reproduction, in full or in part, of this publication must credit TRAFFIC North America. The views of the author expressed in this publication do not necessarily reflect those of the TRAFFIC Network, World Wildlife Fund (WWF), or IUCN-The World Conservation Union. The designation of geographical entities in this publication and the presentation of the material do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of TRAFFIC or its supporting organizations concerning the legal status of any country, territory, or area, or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. The TRAFFIC symbol copyright and Registered Trademark ownership are held by WWF. TRAFFIC is a joint program of WWF and IUCN. Suggested citation: Williamson, D. F. 2003. Caviar and Conservation: Status, Management and Trade of North American Sturgeon and Paddlefish. TRAFFIC North America. Washington D.C.: World Wildlife Fund. Front cover photograph of a lake sturgeon (Acipenser fulvescens) by Richard T. Bryant, courtesy of the Tennessee Aquarium. Back cover photograph of a paddlefish (Polyodon spathula) by Richard T. Bryant, courtesy of the Tennessee Aquarium. TABLE OF CONTENTS Preface .
    [Show full text]
  • Sturgeon and Paddlefish Life History and Management: Experts’ Knowledge and Beliefs
    Received: 18 May 2017 | Accepted: 16 June 2017 DOI: 10.1111/jai.13563 STURGEON PAPER Sturgeon and paddlefish life history and management: Experts’ knowledge and beliefs I. Jarić1,2,3 | C. Riepe1,4 | J. Gessner1 1Leibniz-Institute of Freshwater Ecology and Inland Fisheries, Berlin, Germany Summary 2Biology Centre of the Czech Academy of Although sturgeons and paddlefish represent a highly endangered species group, Sciences, Institute of Hydrobiology, České knowledge regarding their ecology, life history and management and restoration Budějovice, Czech Republic measures still reveals substantial gaps and uncertainties. As such, it was hypothesized 3Institute for Multidisciplinary Research, University of Belgrade, Belgrade, that the information on overall experiences and perspectives of researchers working Serbia in the field would provide a good indication of the state of knowledge, and help iden- 4Thünen-Institute of Baltic Sea Fisheries, Rostock, Germany tify areas for further investigation. To gain in- depth insight into their perspectives on a variety of topics related to sturgeon life history, management and conservation, as Correspondence Ivan Jarić, Biology Centre of the Czech well as opinions on issues characterized by a lack of data, a worldwide online survey Academy of Sciences, Institute of was conducted among scientists specializing in sturgeon and paddlefish research. Hydrobiology, České Budějovice, Czech Republic. With a total of 277 respondents, the response rate was good (40.3% of those invited). Email: [email protected]; [email protected] The survey results indicated a high level of uncertainty with regard to various aspects of sturgeon life history, such as spawning migrations, reproduction and senescence. Responses differed largely with the origin and the research focus of the participants.
    [Show full text]
  • MUSEUM of Natural History
    })I(( -w-~ p ~ .... ~ .~---. ~O~ ALABAMA MUSEUM of Natural History Number 10 June I, 1991 Notropis rafinesquei, a New Cyprinid Fish from the yazoo River System in Mississippi Reproductive Behavior of Exoglossum Species Scaphirhynchus suttkusi, a New Sturgeon from the Moblle Basin of Alabama and Mississippi BULLETIN ALABAMA MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY The scientific publication of the Alabama Museum of Natural History. Richard L. Mayden, Editor, John C. Hall, Managing Editor. BULLETIN ALABAMA MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY is published by the Alabama Museum of Natural History, a unit of The University of Alabama. The BULLETIN succeeds its predecessor, the MUSEUM PAPERS, which was terminated in 1961 upon the transfer of the Museum to the University from its parent organization, the Geological Survey of Alabama. The BULLETIN is devoted primarily to scholarship and research concerning the natural history of Alabama and the midsouth. It appears irregularly in consecutively numbered issues. Communication concerning manuscripts, style, and editorial policy should be addressed to: Editor, BULLETIN ALABAMA MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY, The University of Alabama, Box 870340, Tuscaloosa, AL 35487-0340; Telephone (205) 348-7550. Prospective authors should examine the Notice to Authors inside the back cover. Orders and requests for general information should be addressed to Managing Editor, BULLETIN ALABAMA MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY, at the above address. Numbers may be purchased individually; standing orders are accepted. Remittances should accompany orders for individual numbers and be payable to The University of Alabama. The BULLETIN will invoice standing orders. Library exchanges may be handled through: Exchange Librarian, The University of Alabama, Box 870266, Tuscaloosa, AL 35487-0340.
    [Show full text]
  • Morphological Phylogeny of Sturgeons
    Morphological Phylogeny of Sturgeons Biological Classification of Sturgeons and Paddlefishes Kingdom Anamalia Multicellular organism Phylum Chordata Vertebrates Superclass Osteichthyes Bony Fishes Class Actinopterygii Ray-finned fishes Subclass Chondrostei Cartilaginous and ossified bony fish Order Acipenseriformes Sturgeons and Paddlefishes Family Acipenseridae Sturgeons Genus Species Acipenser Huso Pseudoscaphirhynchus Scaphirhynchus Family Polydontidae Paddlefishes Genus Species Polydon Psephurus Currently there are 31 species within the order “Acipenseriformes” which contains two paddlefish species and 29 sturgeon species. Sturgeons and paddlefishes are a unique order of fishes due to their interesting physical and internal morphological characteristics. Polydontidae Acipenseridae Acipenser Huso Scaphirhynchus Pseudoscaphirhynchus Sturgeons and Paddlefishes Acipenseriformes Teleostei Holostei Chondrostei Polypteriformes Birchirs and Reedfishes Ray-Finned Bony Fishes • •Dorsal Finlets Jawed Fishes •Ganoid Scales •Cartilaginous Skeleton Actinopterygii •Rudimentary Lungs •Paired Fins •Heterocercal Tail Osteichthyes Sarcopterygii Sharks, Skates, Rays (Bony Fishes) Lobe-Finned Bony Fishes Chondrichthyes Coelacanth, Lungfishes, tetrapods •Fleshy, Lobed, Paired Fins •Complex Limbs •Enamel Covered Teeth Agnatha •Symmetrical Tail Lamprey, Hagfish •Jawless Fishes •Distinct Notocord •Paired Fins Absent Acipenseriformes likely evolved between the late Jurassic and early Cretaceous geological periods (70 to 170 million years ago). The word “sturgeon”
    [Show full text]
  • GULF STURGEON (Acipenser Oxyrinchus Desotoi)
    GULF STURGEON (Acipenser oxyrinchus desotoi) 5-Year Review: Summary and Evaluation U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Southeast Region Panama City Ecological Services Field Office Panama City, Florida National Marine Fisheries Service Southeast Region Office of Protected Resources St. Petersburg, Florida September 2009 GULF STURGEON (Acipenser oxyrinchus desotoi) 5-YEAR REVIEW I. GENERAL INFORMATION 1.1. Methodology used to complete the review A public notice initiating this review and requesting information was published on April 16, 2008, with a 60-day response period (73 FR 20702). The public notice was supplemented with a request for information by postcard dated April 17, 2008, mailed directly to 130 entities (individuals, natural resources agencies, conservation organizations) that could likely have information pertinent to this review. One (1) set of comments/data was received in response to the public notice and postcards, which was incorporated as appropriate into this 5-year review. The lead recovery biologists for the NMFS and the FWS gathered and synthesized information regarding the biology and status of the Gulf sturgeon. Our information sources included: the Gulf Sturgeon Recovery/Management Plan (1995); peer-reviewed scientific publications; grey literature (annual reports); information presented at annual Gulf sturgeon meetings; ongoing field survey results and information shared from Gulf sturgeon researchers (both Service and State biologists); the final rule listing the Gulf sturgeon as threatened (56 FR 49653) (September 30, 1991); and the final rule designating critical habitat for the Gulf sturgeon (68 FR 13370) (March 19, 2003). We submitted a peer-review draft of this document to 16 professional biologists with expertise on the Gulf sturgeon and its habitats.
    [Show full text]
  • Status of Knowledge of the Shovelnose Sturgeon (Scaphirhynchus Platorynchus, Rafinesque, 1820) Q
    CORE Metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk Provided by UNL | Libraries University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Papers in Natural Resources Natural Resources, School of 2016 Status of knowledge of the Shovelnose Sturgeon (Scaphirhynchus platorynchus, Rafinesque, 1820) Q. E. Phelps Missouri Department of Conservation, [email protected] S. J. Tripp Missouri Department of Conservation M. J. Hamel University of Nebraska-Lincoln, [email protected] J. Koch Kansas Department of Wildlife Parks and Tourism E. J. Heist Southern Illinois University Carbondale See next page for additional authors Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/natrespapers Part of the Natural Resources and Conservation Commons, Natural Resources Management and Policy Commons, and the Other Environmental Sciences Commons Phelps, Q. E.; Tripp, S. J.; Hamel, M. J.; Koch, J.; Heist, E. J.; Garvey, J. E.; Kappenman, K. M.; and Webb, M. A. H., "Status of knowledge of the Shovelnose Sturgeon (Scaphirhynchus platorynchus, Rafinesque, 1820)" (2016). Papers in Natural Resources. 599. http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/natrespapers/599 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Natural Resources, School of at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in Papers in Natural Resources by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. Authors Q. E. Phelps, S. J. Tripp, M. J. Hamel, J. Koch, E. J. Heist, J. E. Garvey, K. M. Kappenman, and M. A. H. Webb This article is available at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln: http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/natrespapers/599 Journal of Applied Ichthyology J.
    [Show full text]
  • Status of the Flame Chub Hemitremia Flammea in Alabama, USA
    Vol. 12: 87–93, 2010 ENDANGERED SPECIES RESEARCH Published online July 19 doi: 10.3354/esr00283 Endang Species Res OPENPEN ACCESSCCESS Status of the flame chub Hemitremia flammea in Alabama, USA Bruce Stallsmith* Department of Biological Sciences, University of Alabama in Huntsville, Huntsville, Alabama 35899, USA ABSTRACT: The status of many freshwater fish species in the species-rich southeastern United States is surprisingly poorly known. Vulnerable species found in smaller streams in the region have not received adequate research attention. The flame chub Hemitremia flammea (Cyprinidae) is included among a group of stream species considered to be ‘narrow endemics’ susceptible to habitat alterations due to growing human population. The obligatory habitat is spring-fed streams sensitive to human activities. The species has a patchy range primarily in the Tennessee River Valley in Alabama and Tennessee, USA. The conservation status of the flame chub is poorly documented. The NatureServe global status of the flame chub is G3, Vulnerable, and the Alabama state status is S3, Vulnerable. Reflecting the poor knowledge of the species’ status, the International Union for the Con- servation of Nature (IUCN) Red List Category is DD (Data Deficient), a change from an earlier listing of Rare. This study is intended as a presence or absence survey of flame chubs at historic location sites in north Alabama based on holdings records of the University of Alabama Ichthyology Collec- tion in Tuscaloosa, Alabama. Fifty-three sites in 9 counties in the Tennessee River drainage with a historic record of flame chub presence were visited and sampled by seining. One or more flame chubs were found at 18 of these sites.
    [Show full text]
  • Conservation Status of Imperiled North American Freshwater And
    FEATURE: ENDANGERED SPECIES Conservation Status of Imperiled North American Freshwater and Diadromous Fishes ABSTRACT: This is the third compilation of imperiled (i.e., endangered, threatened, vulnerable) plus extinct freshwater and diadromous fishes of North America prepared by the American Fisheries Society’s Endangered Species Committee. Since the last revision in 1989, imperilment of inland fishes has increased substantially. This list includes 700 extant taxa representing 133 genera and 36 families, a 92% increase over the 364 listed in 1989. The increase reflects the addition of distinct populations, previously non-imperiled fishes, and recently described or discovered taxa. Approximately 39% of described fish species of the continent are imperiled. There are 230 vulnerable, 190 threatened, and 280 endangered extant taxa, and 61 taxa presumed extinct or extirpated from nature. Of those that were imperiled in 1989, most (89%) are the same or worse in conservation status; only 6% have improved in status, and 5% were delisted for various reasons. Habitat degradation and nonindigenous species are the main threats to at-risk fishes, many of which are restricted to small ranges. Documenting the diversity and status of rare fishes is a critical step in identifying and implementing appropriate actions necessary for their protection and management. Howard L. Jelks, Frank McCormick, Stephen J. Walsh, Joseph S. Nelson, Noel M. Burkhead, Steven P. Platania, Salvador Contreras-Balderas, Brady A. Porter, Edmundo Díaz-Pardo, Claude B. Renaud, Dean A. Hendrickson, Juan Jacobo Schmitter-Soto, John Lyons, Eric B. Taylor, and Nicholas E. Mandrak, Melvin L. Warren, Jr. Jelks, Walsh, and Burkhead are research McCormick is a biologist with the biologists with the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Register/Vol. 65, No. 25/Monday, February 7, 2000
    5848 Federal Register / Vol. 65, No. 25 / Monday, February 7, 2000 / Proposed Rules Issued on: February 2, 2000. Mississippi 39213. You may also Comment Procedures Stephen R. Kratzke, comment via the Internet to paulÐ Acting Associate Administrator for Safety [email protected]. See the Please submit Internet comments as Performance Standards. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section for an ASCII file, avoiding the use of special [FR Doc. 00±2717 Filed 2±2±00; 4:34 pm] comment procedures. characters and any form of encryption. Please also include ``Attention: BILLING CODE 4910±59±P FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Paul [Alabama sturgeon]'' and your name and Hartfield (see``ADDRESSES'' section), return address in your Internet message. telephone 601/321±1125; facsimile 601/ If you do not receive a confirmation DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR 965±4340. from the system that we have received Fish and Wildlife Service SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: your Internet message, contact us directly at the address given in the Background 50 CFR Part 17 ADDRESSES section or by telephone at On March 26, 1999, we published a 601/965±4900. Finally, you may also RIN 1018±AF56 rule proposing endangered status for the hand-deliver comments to the address given in the ADDRESSES Section. Our Endangered and Threatened Wildlife Alabama sturgeon in the Federal Register (64 FR 14676). On January 11, practice is to make comments, including and Plants; Notice of Withdrawal of names and home addresses of Released Study, Submission of New 2000, we published a notice in the Federal Register (65 FR 1583), to reopen respondents, available for public review Report, and Opening of Comment during regular business hours.
    [Show full text]