DOCSLIB.ORG

Downtown Housing Study

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Downtown & Surrounding Neighborhoods Housing Study & Strategy Prepared for Analysis – Housing & Market The City of Tulsa May 2020 Chapter 2 Chapter 1 Chapter 2 Housing & Market Analysis Acknowledgments Steering Committee Neighborhood Stakeholder Group Jared Andresen Delia Kimbrel Kevin Anderson Polly Robinson Michael Reed Commercial Oklahoma (Cushman Impact Tulsa Pearl Cherry Street Lacy Park Council Wakefield) Robert Leikam Chris Armstrong Bob Fleischman Christine Rodgers Chris Benge American Residential Group Blue Dome Tulsa Arts Gunboat OSUCHS Terry McGee Jonathan Belzley Patrick Fox Arolynn Smith Thomas Boxley McGee Enterprises Tracy Park SOBO Legacy Tulsa Development Authority; KIPP Tulsa Kara Joy McKee Leanne Benton Diane Haney Roxanne Snider Clarence Boyd Tulsa City Council District 4 Pearl Cathedral Owen Park Coalescent Community Development Corp - Simmons Bank Andy McMillan Libby Billings Kevin Harrison Tom Wallace Cherokee Nation Businesses Deco Crosbie Heights Tulsa Arts Sharyn Cosby North Tulsa Ministers Conference Zechariah Harjo Tony Bluford Lance Hays Kirk Wester Muscogee (Creek) Nation Crutchfield Owen Park Emerson Gordy Guest Downtown Coordinating Council; Burlinda Radney Marsha Campbell Twan Jones Bill White Cyntergy; Tulsa Regional Chamber Keller Williams Realty Legacy The Heights Dunbar Vanessa Hall-Harper Jeff Smith Norma Cheadle Nantelle Kemp Kandy Whitley-White Tulsa City Council District 1 Tulsa Homebuilders Association University Park Village 1 Dunbar Elian Hurtado Shagah Zakerion Julie Collins Mary Lewis Jerod Widemon Economic Development Commission; Williams Crutchfield Greenwood Joe Louis Tulsa Habitat for Humanity Gerald Davis Stuart McDaniel Daquet Wilson Emily Hutton Greenwood East Village Greenwood Tulsa Public Schools Rich Eagleton Miriam Mills Riverview Crosbie Heights Downtown & Surrounding Neighborhoods Housing Study & Strategy & Surrounding Downtown 2 Project Co-Leads Client Team Consultant Team Becky Gligo Jim Coles Development Strategies City of Tulsa - Housing Policy City of Tulsa - Economic Development Matt Wetli, Principal Travis Hulse Nick Doctor Justin Carney, Principal INCOG - Tulsa Planning Office City of Tulsa - Community Development & Policy Andy Pfister, Project Director Jeff Hall Miriam Keller, Project Manager Tulsa Housing Authority Megan Hinrichsen, Art Director Gary Hamer Richa Singh, Project Planner City of Tulsa - Grants Steve Schuman, Real Estate Strategist Kian Kamas Tejashree Kulkarni, Real Estate Analyst City of Tulsa - Economic Development Liam Flood, Market Analyst Brian Kurtz Tiffany Bae, Graphic Designer City of Tulsa - Downtown Coordinating Council Jen Concepcion, Geospatial Analyst Dwain Midget City of Tulsa - Working in Neighborhoods MKSK Susan Miller Chris Hermann, Principal and Strategic Advisor INCOG - Tulsa Planning Office Ashley Philippsen Image credits: Unless otherwise specificed in the report, City of Tulsa - Community Development & Policy all images of Tulsa are from Development Strategies. Krystal Reyes City of Tulsa – Resilience and Equity OC Walker Tulsa Development Authority 3 Chapter 2 Housing & Market Analysis Downtown & Surrounding Neighborhoods Housing Study & Strategy & Surrounding Downtown 4 Contents 7 Introduction & Summary 19 Housing & Market Analysis 43 Feasibility Considerations 53 Housing Goals & Strategy 55 “ 87 Implementation 101 Appendix 5 Chapter 1 Introduction & Summary Downtown & Surrounding Neighborhoods Housing Study & Strategy & Surrounding Downtown 6 1 Introduction & Summary – Introduction & Summary – Introduction Chapter 1 Chapter 7 Chapter 1 Introduction & Summary Study Background & Purpose Development and Reinvestment Quality of Life This study and strategy was Since 2010, Downtown and some of the Recent placemaking investments have contributed commissioned by the City of Tulsa— surrounding neighborhoods have experienced to high-quality living experiences in Tulsa’s urban in partnership with the Downtown significant growth and reinvestment, including core neighborhoods. It is evident in the popular Coordinating Council, Economic 690 new multifamily units (with an additional use of Arkansas River trails that promote health Development Commission, Tulsa 1,200 proposed or under construction) and $1.4 and fitness; Guthrie Green in the Arts District Development Authority, and Tulsa billion in building permits just in Downtown. where Tulsans gather on the lawn to listen to Planning Office—to comprehensively Nearly $1 billion in public investment through music and play; and the Gathering Place, a 65- re-assess housing needs Downtown Vision Tulsa was also key in fueling this dynamic acre world-class riverfront park with year-round and in the surrounding neighborhoods, transformation, supporting projects like the new events for all ages. and craft a holistic development and BMX national headquarters, Arena District Master policy framework to guide equitable Plan implementation, Bus Rapid Transit routes, Legacy of Inequity Route 66 revitalization, and much more. housing investments in the area. While the market environment, economy, and quality of life have significantly improved in many In 2010, the City of Tulsa commissioned a study Employment Growth parts of Tulsa’s urban core, some neighborhoods to assess the potential demand for residential The new and expanding job markets highlight have seen little private investment over this same development in Downtown and near-Downtown an increased interest from employers who value period, and have not yet shared in Downtown’s neighborhoods. The study identified robust quality of life, public safety, and infrastructure growing prosperity. As the 100-year anniversary demand for new housing in the Study Area— to attract and retain talent both now and in of the Tulsa Race Massacre approaches, including as many as 1,600 new rental housing the future. Downtown contains the largest acknowledging and discussing history and its units—and offered several recommendations employment density in the City of Tulsa with impact on the Tulsa seen today is at the forefront for stimulating housing production to meet nearly 35,000 jobs in just 1.3 square miles. of civic dialogue. Historic racial bias in policy those housing needs. Implementation of the Regional job growth is highlighted by the new and investment decisions—such as redlining, study’s recommendations led to the creation of a campus of The Greenheck Group (more than Urban Renewal, and racial zoning—continue to revolving loan program known as the Vision 2025 900 jobs), the new Amazon fulfillment center hold many neighborhoods behind and create Downtown Housing Fund, which alongside other (1,500 jobs), an 800,000 square foot expansion significant barriers to equitable participation in programs, has invested more than $20 million of Whirlpool’s existing facility (150 jobs), the the area’s renewed prosperity. An understanding Downtown and supported the development of creation of 600 new jobs and $550 million in of the challenges and disparate experiences of the hundreds of residential units. investment by American Airlines, along with many African-American, Hispanic, and Native American other businesses who plan to locate and expand communities and other residents of color will be Repayment of the revolving loan funds began in operations in Tulsa. needed to ensure that the strategies outlined in 2018, with the full balance of funds to be recouped this report meet the needs of all Tulsans. by 2024. As the City looks to the potential redeployment of these funds, it must re-assess the housing needs based on changing circumstances and the need to embrace equity in policymaking. Downtown & Surrounding Neighborhoods Housing Study & Strategy & Surrounding Downtown 8 Purpose of this Study and Strategy In light of changing market conditions and a renewed focus on the need to overcome Tulsa’s inequities, the City of Tulsa and its partners commissioned this housing study and strategy to reassess the potential for residential development in Downtown and the surrounding neighborhoods (herein referred to as the Study Area), and craft a The holistic strategic framework for meeting housing Study needs. Area The assessment’s process and approach also placed a new focus on: • Engaging communities in and around Downtown to ensure that community 2010 Study experience and feedback closely guided the Boundary work; • Identifying opportunities to align investments with community priorities to ensure that recommended strategies support the goals of the area’s broad range of stakeholders; and • Identifying tools that address the housing needs of all residents including long-time residents, new community members, and residents with a wide range of affordability levels. The Study Area for this current assessment is expanded to include a broader set of neighborhoods that represent core focus areas for equitable reinvestment by the City and its partners. – Introduction & Summary – Introduction Chapter 1 Chapter Study Area extents 9 Chapter 1 Introduction & Summary Approach: Three Big Ideas also contribute to a sense of place, making the Growth and the Cost of Housing area more attractive to prospective downtown While housing in Tulsa is relatively low cost today, This assessment of housing needs and employers and residents. the City and its partners must also plan for a strategies is guided by three core ideas Tulsa has made incredible strides with its future in which these conditions change. If Tulsa that together recognize the complexity Downtown, investing in quality development,
Recommended publications
  • Enhancing Our Position and Scale in Key Growth Markets Acquisitions of Landmark Community Bank and Triumph Bancshares, Inc

    Enhancing Our Position and Scale in Key Growth Markets Acquisitions of Landmark Community Bank and Triumph Bancshares, Inc

    Nasdaq: SFNC Enhancing our position and scale in key growth markets Acquisitions of Landmark Community Bank and Triumph Bancshares, Inc. June 7, 2021 Memphis Nashville Forward-Looking Statements Certain statements contained in this presentation may not be based on historical facts and should be considered “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These forward-looking statements may be identified by reference to a future period(s) or by the use of forward-looking terminology, such as “anticipate,” “believe,” “budget,” “contemplate,” “continue,” “estimate,” “expect,” “foresee,” “intend,” “indicate,” “target,” “plan,” positions,” “prospects,” “project,” “predict,” or “potential,” by future conditional verbs such as “could,” “may,” “might,” “should,” “will,” or “would,” or by variations of such words or by similar expressions. These forward-looking statements include, without limitation, statements relating to the impact Simmons First National Corporation (“Company”) expects the proposed transactions (“Transactions”) with Landmark Community Bank (“Landmark”) and Triumph Bancshares, Inc. (“Triumph”) to have on the combined entities’ operations, financial condition and financial results (including, among other things, pro forma information), and the Company’s expectations about its ability to successfully integrate the combined businesses and the amount of cost savings and other benefits the Company expects to realize as a result of the Transactions. The forward-looking statements
  • No. 4:20CR568 SEP-DON

    No. 4:20CR568 SEP-DON

    Case: 4:20-cr-00568-SEP-DDN Doc. #: 2 Filed: 09/17/20 Page: 1 of 24 PageID #: 28 FILED UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SEP l:i'7 2020 EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI U. S. DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MO EASTERN DIVISION ST. LOUIS UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) V. ) No. ) 4:20CR568 SEP-DON FRANCO SICURO, M.D., ) and ) CARLOS HIMPLER, ) ) Defendants. ) INDICTMENT The Grand Jury charges: BACKGROUND Defendants 1. At all times relevant to this indictment; defendant Franco Sicuro, M.D. ("Dr. Sicuro"), was a psychiatrist, licensed to practice in the state of Missouri. Since in or about June 2001, Dr. Sicuro has owned, operated, been the medical director, or otherwise been associated with one or more health care related businesses, including Millennium Psychiatric Associates ("MP A"), Advanced Geriatric Management ("AGM"), Centrec Care, Sleep Consultants of St. Louis, Midwest Toxicology Group ("MTG" or "Midwest"), Genotec Dx ("Genotec"), and Benemed Diagnostics. 2. At times relevant to this indictment, defendant Carlos Himpler ("Himpler") lived in St. Louis County, Missouri and described himself as a business development strategist. Since in or about June 2008, Himpler has owned and operated one or more health care related businesses, including Rest Easy of St. Louis, Sleep Consultants of St. Louis, Midwest, Genotec, 1 Case: 4:20-cr-00568-SEP-DDN Doc. #: 2 Filed: 09/17/20 Page: 2 of 24 PageID #: 29 Core Toxicology, and Core Dx. 3. At all relevant times, Dr. Sicuro and Himpler, as individuals or through their businesses, submitted and caused to be submitted reimbursement claims to health care benefit programs.
  • TULSA OFFICE (918) 587-0000 • Mcafeetaft.Com

    TULSA OFFICE (918) 587-0000 • Mcafeetaft.Com

    Williams Center Tower II • Two W Second Street Suite 1100 • Tulsa, OK 74103 TULSA OFFICE (918) 587-0000 • mcafeetaft.com Located on the southeast corner of Second Street and Boulder Avenue in downtown Tulsa, the 23-story Williams Center Tower II serves as home to McAfee & Taft’s Tulsa office. It is conveniently located within walking distance of the Federal Courthouse, Tulsa County Courthouse, BOK Center, and numerous hotels and restaurants. Complimentary on-site covered parking is provided for visitors on client-related business matters. Visitors to the firm can find metered parking on adjacent streets and in public parking garages and surface lots to the north and east of Williams Center Tower II on W. Second Street. DIRECTIONS FROM TULSA INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT: As you exit the airport, take Airport Drive to Gilcrease Expressway (OK-11). Turn right onto Gilcrease Expressway, heading westbound to US-75. Take US-75 south to the 1st Street exit. Follow 1st Street to Cheyenne Avenue. Turn left onto Cheyenne Avenue. Follow Cheyenne Avenue one block to 2nd Street. Turn left onto 2nd Street and proceed past Boulder Avenue, Williams Center Tower II is on the right. DIRECTIONS FROM WEST I-44 (FROM OKLAHOMA CITY) As you approach the I-44/I-244 junction in Tulsa, take I-244 E toward Downtown Tulsa. Take Exit 4C for 7th Street toward Downtown. Follow 7th Street then shift left onto 6th Street. Turn left onto Boulder Avenue to 2nd Street. Turn right onto 2nd Street and Williams Center Tower II is on the right. DIRECTIONS FROM EAST I-44 (FROM WILL ROGERS TURNPIKE, VINITA AND MIAMI, OK): As you approach Tulsa, I-44 merges with US 412.
  • Report for Greenwood District Tulsa, Tulsa County, Oklahoma

    Report for Greenwood District Tulsa, Tulsa County, Oklahoma

    REPORT FOR GREENWOOD DISTRICT TULSA, TULSA COUNTY, OKLAHOMA The 100-block of North Greenwood Avenue, June 1921, Mary E. Jones Parrish Collection, Oklahoma Historical Society PREPARED FOR THE INDIAN NATIONS COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS, ON BEHALF OF THE TULSA PRESERVATION COMMISSION, CITY OF TULSA 2 WEST 2ND STREET, SUITE 800, TULSA, OKLAHOMA 74103 BY PRESERVATION AND DESIGN STUDIO PLLC 616 NW 21ST STREET, OKLAHOMA CITY, OK 73103 MAY 2020 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 Abstract ...................................................................................................4 2 Introduction ..............................................................................................6 3 Research Design .......................................................................................9 4 Project Objectives ....................................................................................9 5 Methodology ............................................................................................10 6 Expected Results ......................................................................................13 7 Area Surveyed ..........................................................................................14 8 Historic Context .......................................................................................18 9 Survey Results .........................................................................................27 10 Bibliography ............................................................................................36 APPENDICES Appendix
  • Unearthing the True Toll of the Tulsa Race Massacre - SAPIENS

    Unearthing the True Toll of the Tulsa Race Massacre - SAPIENS

    10/22/2020 Unearthing the True Toll of the Tulsa Race Massacre - SAPIENS A n t h r o p o l o g y M a g a z i n e The Booker T. Washington High School parade processes along Greenwood Avenue in Tulsa, Oklahoma. Greenwood Cultural Center NEWS IN BRIEF Unearthing the True Toll of the Tulsa Race Massacre With the 99th anniversary at hand, a community works with archaeologists to answer longstanding questions about a brutal tragedy. By Megan I. Gannon 22 MAY 2020 https://www.sapiens.org/news/tulsa-race-massacre/ 1/6 10/22/2020 Unearthing the True Toll of the Tulsa Race Massacre - SAPIENS MEGAN I. GANNON is a journalist based in Berlin, Germany. ust north of downtown Tulsa, Oklahoma, Greenwood once had one of the most successful African American commercial districts in the country. By 1921, it was home to numerous black-owned businesses— J beauty shops, grocery stores, restaurants, and the oces of lawyers, realtors, and doctors. Residents caught silent lms and musical performances at the Dreamland Theater. They could choose between two neighborhood newspapers. Greenwood oered a place to get bootleg liquor or attend church services. Although many people lived in the district’s spare wooden homes along unpaved streets, enough wealthy African American entrepreneurs called Greenwood home that it earned the nickname “Black Wall Street.” All of that changed on the night of May 31, 1921. White mobs, armed with shotguns and torches, terrorized Greenwood in a horric expression of racial violence. The attackers killed an unknown number as they reduced a vital neighborhood to ashes.
  • SBA Participating 7A Lenders in Colorado (Colorado Based Lenders in Bold)

    SBA Participating 7A Lenders in Colorado (Colorado Based Lenders in Bold)

    SBA Participating 7a Lenders in Colorado (Colorado Based Lenders in Bold) 5 Star Bank Canvas CREDIT UNION Accion Canvas CREDIT UNION Adams Bank & Trust Celtic Bank Corporation Alamosa State Bank Champion Bank Alpine Bank Choice Financial Group America First FEDERAL CREDIT UNION CIBC Bank USA American Bank of Commerce Citizens Bank Ameris Bank Citywide Banks AMG National Trust Bank CoastalStates Bank ANB Bank Colorado Lending Source, Ltd. Atlantic Capital Bank, National Association Commerce Bank Bank of America, National Association Commonwealth Business Bank Bank of Colorado Community Banks of Colorado, A Division of Bank of Estes Park Crestmark Bank Bank of George CRF Small Business Loan Company, LLC Bank of Hope Custer Federal State Bank Bank of the West Del Norte Bank BankUnited, National Association Denver Community CREDIT UNION BBVA USA Denver Investment Advisors LLC Bellco CREDIT UNION Dubuque Bank and Trust Company Berkshire Bank Ent CREDIT UNION BOKF, National Association Evergreen National Bank Busey Bank Evolve Bank & Trust Byline Bank Farmers & Stockmens Bank Cache Bank & Trust Farmers Bank Cache Valley Bank Farmers State Bank Cadence Bank, National Association Farmers State Bank of Calhan Fidelity Bank, A Division of Hanmi Bank Fifth Third Bank High Country Bank First American State Bank High Plains Bank First Bank Home Loan State Bank First Bank Financial Centre HomeTrust Bank First Business Bank Immito, LLC First Colorado National Bank InBank First FarmBank IncredibleBank First Financial Bank Independence Bank First Home
  • Reliability. Integrated

    Reliability. Integrated

    MIX Paper from responsible sources FSC® C103375 ONEOK 2019 ANNUAL Integrated Reliability. REPORT ONEOK 2019 ANNUAL REPORT 100 West Fifth Street Tulsa, Oklahoma 74103-4298 Post Office Box 871 Tulsa, Oklahoma 74102-0871 www.oneok.com BOARD OF DIRECTORS ONEOK, Inc. (pronounced ONE-OAK) (NYSE: OKE) is a leading midstream service provider and owner of one of the nation's premier natural gas liquids (NGL) systems, Brian L. Derksen Jim W. Mogg connecting NGL supply in the Rocky Mountain, Permian and Mid-Continent regions with key market centers and an extensive network of natural gas gathering, Retired Global Deputy Chief Executive Officer, Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu Limited Retired Chairman, DCP Midstream GP, L.L.C. processing, storage and transportation assets. Dallas, Texas Hydro, Oklahoma Julie H. Edwards Pattye L. Moore ONEOK is a FORTUNE 500 company and is included in the S&P 500. For the latest news about ONEOK, find us on LinkedIn, Facebook, Twitter and Instagram. Former Chief Financial Officer, Southern Union Company; Former Chairman, Red Robin Gourmet Burgers; Former Chief Financial Officer, Frontier Oil Corporation Former President, Sonic Corp. Houston, Texas Broken Arrow, Oklahoma John W. Gibson Gary D. Parker Chairman of the Board and Retired Chief Executive Officer, ONEOK, Inc. President, Moffitt, Parker & Company, Inc. Financial Performance Tulsa, Oklahoma Muskogee, Oklahoma Mark W. Helderman Eduardo A. Rodriguez Retired Managing Director and Co-Portfolio Manager, Sasco Capital Inc. President, Strategic Communications Consulting Group Cleveland, Ohio El Paso, Texas Randall J. Larson Terry K. Spencer Retired Chief Executive Officer, TransMontaigne Partners L.P. President and Chief Executive Officer, ONEOK, Inc.
  • Top Investors Dallas Regional Chamber

    Top Investors Dallas Regional Chamber

    DALLAS REGIONAL CHAMBER | TOP INVESTORS DALLAS REGIONAL CHAMBER REGIONAL DALLAS JBJ Management Norton Rose Fulbright Silicon Valley Bank The Fairmont Hotel Top Investors JE Dunn Construction NTT DATA Inc. Simmons Bank The Kroger Co. Jim Ross Law Group PC Omni Dallas Hotel Slalom The University of The Dallas Regional Chamber (DRC) recognizes the following companies and organizations for their membership investment at JLL Omniplan, Inc. Smoothie King Texas at Arlington one of our top levels. Companies in bold print are represented on the DRC Board of Directors. For more information about the Jones Day Omnitracs, LLC SMU - Southern Methodist Thompson & Knight LLP University benefits of membership at these levels call (214) 746-6600. JPMorgan Chase & Co. Oncor Thompson Coburn Southern Dock Products Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP On-Target Supplies Thomson Reuters Southern Glazer’s Wine and KDC Real Estate Development & & Logistics Ltd TIAA Spirits 1820 Productions Bell Nunnally Crowe LLP Google Investments Options Clearing Corporation T-Mobile | Southwest Airlines 4Front Engineered Solutions BGSF CSRS goPuff TOP INVESTORS Ketchum Public Relations Origin Bank Tom Thumb - Albertsons 7-Eleven, Inc. Billingsley Company CyrusOne Granite Properties Southwest Office Systems, Inc. Kilpatrick Townsend ORIX Corporation USA Town of Addison A G Hill Partners LLC BKD LLP Dallas Baptist University Grant Thornton LLP & Stockton LLP Spacee Inc. OYO Hotels and Homes Toyota Motor North America ABC Home & Commercial bkm Total Office of Texas Dallas College Green Brick Partners Kimberly-Clark Corporation Spectra Pacific Builders Transworld Business Advisors - Services Kimley-Horn and Associates Spencer Fane LLP Blackmon Mooring & BMS CAT Dallas Cowboys Football Club Greenberg Traurig Pape-Dawson Downtown Dallas Accenture Ltd.
  • Navigating Housing Development in the New Era Thursday, May 9, 2019 General Session; 9:00 – 10:30 A.M

    Navigating Housing Development in the New Era Thursday, May 9, 2019 General Session; 9:00 – 10:30 A.M

    Navigating Housing Development in the New Era Thursday, May 9, 2019 General Session; 9:00 – 10:30 a.m. Barbara Kautz, Partner, Goldfarb & Lipman Diana Varat, Of Counsel, Richards, Watson & Gershon DISCLAIMER: These materials are not offered as or intended to be legal advice. Readers should seek the advice of an attorney when confronted with legal issues. Attorneys should perform an independent evaluation of the issues raised in these materials . Copyright © 2019, League of California Cities®. All rights reserved. This paper, or parts thereof, may not be reproduced in any form without express written permission from the League of California Cities®. For further information, contact the League of California Cities® at 1400 K Street, 4th Floor, Sacramento, CA 95814. Telephone: (916) 658-8200. League of California Cities® 2019 Spring Conference Hyatt Regency Monterey Notes:______________________________________________ ____________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________

  • HOME ECONOMICS Five New Models for Domestic Life Days Decades

    HOME ECONOMICS Five new models for domestic life Months Years Hours Days Decades British Pavilion, Venice Architecture Biennale 2016 en it HOME ECONOMICS proposes new models for the frontline of British architecture: the home. HOME ECONOMICS is the science of household management. It intervenes directly in the architecture of the home, responding to changes in life and social norms through the design of the everyday. HOME ECONOMICS asks urgent questions about the role of housing and domestic space in the material reality of familiar life. HOME ECONOMICS is a truly collaborative proposal challenging financial models, categories of ownership, forms of life, social and gender power relations. HOME ECONOMICS understands that in housing there can be no metaphors. Each model in Home Economics is a proposition driven by the conditions imposed on domestic life by varying periods of occupancy. They each address different facets of how we live today – from whether we can prevent property speculation, to whether sharing can be a form of luxury rather than a compromise. Home Economics presents five These models have been developed new models for domestic life curated in an intensely pragmatic way, through five periods of time. These working with architects, artists, timescales – Hours, Days, Months, developers, filmmakers, financial Years and Decades – correspond institutions and fashion designers. to how long each model is to be It is the first exhibition on called “home”. The projects appear architecture to be curated through as full-scale 1:1 interiors in the time spent in the home, and is British Pavilion, displaying dedicated to exploring alternatives architectural proposals as a direct to conventional domestic architecture.
  • Illinois District Office / 500 W

    Illinois District Office / 500 W

    Illinois District Office / 500 W. Madison St. Suite 1150 / Chicago, IL. 60661 [email protected] / 312-353-4528 / www.sba.gov/IL Lender/CDC Performance For Fiscal Year 2018 Ending 4/30/2019 # of CDC - 504 Loans Loans Sum of GROSS AMT 1 Small Business Growth Corporation 86 $ 65,975,000.00 2 SomerCor 504, Inc. 30 $ 23,301,000.00 3 Wessex 504 Corporation 14 $ 17,008,000.00 4 Regional Development Company 4 $ 1,559,000.00 5 Illinois Business Financial Services 3 $ 2,387,000.00 Total 137 $ 110,230,000.00 # of MICROLOANS Loans Total $ 1 JUSTINE PETERSEN 50 $ 202,231.00 2 ACCION 14 $ 81,151.00 Total 64 $ 283,382 .00 # of LENDER - Lender (7a) Loans Loans Total $ 1 The Huntington N.A. Bank 141 $ 27,463,500.00 2 U.S. Bank, N.A. 88 $ 16,832,100.00 3 JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. 85 $ 20,829,000.00 4 Byline Bank 76 $ 71,877,200.00 5 Village Bank and Trust 38 $ 21,935,600.00 6 Independence Bank 37 $ 5,325,000.00 7 First Home Bank 31 $ 6,845,000.00 8 Fifth Third Bank 29 $ 3,860,500.00 9 Newtek Small Business Finance, Inc. 22 $ 15,554,500.00 10 Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. 21 $ 9,362,300.00 11 PNC Bank, N.A. 21 $ 3,552,000.00 12 Bank of Hope 20 $ 1,937,100.00 13 CenTrust Bank, N.A. 19 $ 23,040,000.00 Page | 1 # of LENDER - Lender (7a) Loans Loans Total $ 14 Celtic Bank Corporation 17 $ 11,349,700.00 15 Live Oak Banking Co.
  • Top 10 Lenders by Loan Volume Top 10

    Top 10 Lenders by Loan Volume Top 10

    FY18 Top Lenders SBA Tennessee District Office Loan Volume and Dollar www.sba.gov/tn 1 Oct 2017 thru 31 July 2018 Top 10 Lenders by Loan Volume LENDER NAME Lender State Original Amount Count U.S. Bank, National Association OH $6,094,300.00 66 Pinnacle Bank TN $19,009,500.00 34 United Midwest Savings Bank, National Assoc OH $5,007,000.00 25 Live Oak Banking Company NC $31,423,600.00 20 Celtic Bank Corporation UT $5,613,800.00 18 Wells Fargo Bank, National Association SD $4,455,700.00 17 Stearns Bank National Association MN $3,372,700.00 14 Independence Bank RI $1,575,000.00 14 Newtek Small Business Finance, Inc. NY $7,454,000.00 12 First Home Bank FL $2,705,000.00 12 Top 10 lenders by Dollar Amount LENDER NAME Lender State Approval # Original Amount Live Oak Banking Company NC 20 $31,423,600.00 Pinnacle Bank TN 34 $19,009,500.00 First Tennessee Bank, National Association TN 6 $11,132,300.00 BankUnited, National Association FL 7 $10,220,900.00 First Bank NC 6 $8,236,300.00 Newtek Small Business Finance, Inc. NY 12 $7,454,000.00 South Central Tennessee Business Developmen TN 7 $7,448,000.00 Synovus Bank GA 5 $7,258,200.00 Byline Bank IL 9 $6,691,000.00 U.S. Bank, National Association OH 66 $6,094,300.00 Lender Ranking by Loan Volume SBA Tennessee District Office 1 Oct 2017 thru 31 July 2018 www.sba.gov/tn LENDER NAME Lender State Original Amount Approval # U.S.