DOCSLIB.ORG

Indiana County Government Roles & Responsibilities

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

79072_Booklet.qxd:79072_Booklet 5/4/09 7:20 PM Page 1 79072_Booklet.qxd:79072_Booklet 5/4/09 7:20 PM Page 2 79072_Booklet.qxd:79072_Booklet 5/14/09 6:32 PM Page 3 T HE L The purpose of this pamphlet is to provide basicsic THE LELEGAL STATUS OF COUNTY EGAL information that will be useful in better OFFICIOFFICIALS understanding county government. S BecomiBecoming an Elected Official TATUS As proposed in Indiana’s Constitution, Countyy Government in Indiana still operates under a system Who is Elected of checks and balances that provide voters withh the AccordinAccording to the Indiana Constitution, Article OF power to directly choose their local elected officials.icials. 6, SectioSection 2, the following officers shall be C elected; a Clerk of the Circuit Court, Auditor, OUNTY When our national government was formed, thehe RecordeRecorder, Treasurer, Sheriff, Coroner, and framers of the constitution did not provide forr local SurveyoSurveyor. The offices of county council, board governments. Rather, they left the matters to the of countcounty commissioners, and county assessor, O states. Subsequently, early state constitutions howeverhowever, are not constitutional offices. The FFICIALS generally conceptualized county government ass an General Assembly created these offices by arm of the state. statute. Today, county government impacts economic Article 7 of the Constitution provides for the development, public safety, health, planning andnd election of a prosecuting attorney and a judge zoning, the transportation system, judicial system,tem, of the cicircuit court. Statutes provide for the administration of the property tax system and much election of superior and county court judges in more. many cocounties. What are the various responsibilities of countyy office Terms of Office holders? What statutorily established laws havee been Most cocounty officials are elected for a four- created to allow county officials to carry out theirheir year term of office. Except for the county duties? This pamphlet will answer some of thoseose commiscommissioners, council, assessor, surveyor, and questions. For more detailed information, youu can officers,judicial officers, county officers are limited to visit the Association of Indiana Counties web page at termstwo terms or or eight years of service in a period www.indianacounites.org. twelveof twelve y years. There is no limitation on the number of terms a statutory county officer can The structure of county government in Indianaa serve. CCircuit, superior and county court diversifies power among officeholders to createe a judges aare elected to six-year terms, and the system of checks and balances. Power was diversifiedersified prosecutprosecutor is elected to a four-year term. to prevent corruption and make county decisionon making inclusive. This diversification of powerer places An effeceffective county official not only needs an the ultimate authority in the hands of voters ass understaunderstanding of his or her own office, but important positions are elected rather than also neeneeds a working knowledge of the duties appointed by other elected officeholders. Framersmers of and respresponsibilities of the other county offices. the Constitution chose democracy over appointednted bureaucracy. State statute governs the duties of the Constitutionalutional offices, thereby maintaining county governmentnt as an arm of the state. County government structurere requires cooperative attitudes and a spirit of genuineenuine teamwork among all elected officials. 79072_Booklet.qxd:79072_Booklet 5/4/09 7:20 PM Page 4 79072_Booklet.qxd:79072_Booklet 5/4/09 7:20 PM Page 5 P POWERS AND DUTIES OF COUNTYTY • ToTo establishesta minimum housing standards. OWERS OFFICIALS • AuditingAudit and authorizing payments on behalf of thethe county.coun Legislative Functions • ToTo incorporateinc new towns and alter township AND Throughout the Indiana Code, the board of countyounty boundaryboundar lines, on petition. commissioners is variously referred to as the executivexecutive • ReceivingReceiv bids and authorizing contracts. D body or the legislative body. In all but three off thethe • ExercisingExerci appointive powers including both the UTIES counties: Lake, Marion, and St. Joseph, the legislativegislative selectionselection of members to fill positions on boards, power of the county is divided between the boardoard ofof commissions,commis and committees, and appointments of county commissioners and the county council.. InIn certain departmentd heads. OF these three counties full legislative power is vestedsted inin • PlanningPlanni and implementing strategies for solid C the council by state statute. Under IC 36-2-3.5,.5, waste handlingha as members of solid waste district OUNTY other counties may adopt this arrangement if thethe boards. county commissioners and county council passs identical ordinances. O County Council FFICIALS As a rule, the council has jurisdiction over fiscalal The councilcou has the ultimate decision-making power matters and the commissioners have jurisdictionon overover regardingregardin fiscal affairs. The council has authority to matters concerning either the exercise of regulatoryatory oror view oror review fiscal matters, determine proper administrative powers. policy, anda set priorities for the allocation and expenditureexpendi of county funds. The General Assembly The following generally describes the legislativee rolerole determinesdetermin the powers of the county council in this of the commissioners and the council in most IndianaIndiana area. TypicallyTy these powers include: counties. • ApprovingAppro and fixing annual operating budgets of County Commissioners all countycoun government offices and agencies. The three commissioners are the custodians off thethe • EstablishingEstabl salaries, wages, per diems, and other home rule powers of the county. Counties haveve 33 compensationcompen for all county officials and employees. commissioners, one from each district in the county.ounty. • FixingFixing tax rates and establishing levies on all Within the scope of home rule, commissionerss maymay county propertyp for the purpose of raising funds to adopt and vest themselves with additional regulatoryulatory meet budgetbu requirements in conducting county powers. In Lake, Marion, and St. Joseph counties,nties, business as well as authorizing the borrowing of the county councils are the home rule custodiansans andand money ini the form of bonds and notes. have authority to bestow specific, additional powersowers • AppropriatingAppro public funds, i.e., authorizing the on the commissioners. Specifically, all commissionerssioners expenditureexpendi of county money by particular officials have authority to pass ordinances in the followingwing or departmentsdepar for specific purposes. broad areas: • AuthorizingAutho certain purchases or sales of county owned land.l • Controlling, maintaining, and supervising countyounty • Non-bindingNon-b review of budgets for certain non- property including courthouses, jails, and publiclic elected boardsb in the county and other civil units. offices. • Supervising construction and maintenance off roads,roads, bridges and to provide for traffic control. • Developing economic development programss toto attracts and retain jobs in the county. • To grant vacation pay, sick leave, paid holidaysys andand other similar benefits to county employees. • To administer elections in conjunction with thethe county election board. 79072_Booklet.qxd:79072_Booklet 5/4/09 7:20 PM Page 6 79072_Booklet.qxd:79072_Booklet 5/4/09 8:17 PM Page 7 T HE THE FINANCE TEAM TreasurerTreasu F The offices of Auditor, Treasurer and Assessor must workk InIn Indiana,India voters choose their county treasurer as it is a INANCE together as a team. The success of these offices carrying outout ConstitutionalConstitu Office. In some states, the person who their duties are interdependent. These offices must workk performsperform the duties performed by county treasurers in closely with state agencies, the county commissioners, countyounty IndianaIndiana is referred to as the tax collector. That title perfectly T council and each other to best serve the taxpayers. The auditorauditor describesdescribe the primary duty of the county treasurer. EAM and Treasurer act as a check and balance over the county’sy’s •• TheThe county treasurer is responsible for collecting taxes, finances. InIn thethe casec of delinquent taxes, the treasurer may order the salesale ofof realr property to pay delinquent taxes. Auditor TheThe treasurertrea also receives distributions of local income and The auditors, a Constitutional Office, must wear many hats.hats. otherother taxestax that are collected by the state. The following attempts to categorize the most importantt dutiesduties of the office. TheThe treasurertrea is responsible for the collection of some taxes imposedimposed by state law on behalf of the state and also has The auditor serves as a secretary to the board of county custodialcustodia and investment responsibility for all taxes and other commissioners and the clerk to the county council. revenuesrevenues collected by county government. The auditor has responsibility for keeping accounts and issuingissuing TogetherTogethe with the auditor, the treasurer insures the proper checks for the county. As a result, the board of commissioners,sioners, distributiondistribut of funds. The county treasurer serves as treasurer the council and other officials often look to the auditor forfor day-day- exex officiooffici
Recommended publications
  • Simultaneous Cabinet Further Transformation In

    Simultaneous Cabinet Further Transformation In

    6 SIMULTANEOUS CABINET Monday 13 November 2017 FURTHER TRANSFORMATION IN EAST SUFFOLK (REP1629) EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1. Suffolk Coastal District Council and Waveney District Council agreed in January 2017 to create a new Council for east Suffolk. This was preceded by an intensive period of public consultation in November 2016, the results of which demonstrated that the majority of residents were in favour of one district Council in east Suffolk. 2. The decision to create a new Council for east Suffolk was both ambitious and ground breaking. A “super district” Council will be formed which will be the largest in England in terms of population. The creation of a new Council follows the successful legacy of both Councils working closely together for many years. Officers of all levels of seniority are shared, a joint Business Plan has been adopted and other key policies such as the Housing Strategy are shared. The Councils already share one website under the “East Suffolk” banner and Councillors from both authorities have attended meetings of each Council’s Cabinets since 2010. Cabinet portfolios are aligned and members have shared representation on various outside bodies. 3. The creation of a new Council will be a model other authorities follow as they decide how best to grapple with the significant challenges facing local government. Councils need to be of a scale large enough to face these challenges by having a loud enough voice, a strong bargaining position, a healthy balance sheet and a resilient workforce, yet small enough to feel connected to their residents. The creation of the new Council for east Suffolk will strike that balance.
  • Rule 6 Criminal Cases

    Rule 6 Criminal Cases

    RULE 6 CRIMINAL CASES RULE 6.10 Felony and Misdemeanor Cases No Local Rules under this subdivision. RULE 6.10-A Grand Jury No Local Rules under this subdivision. RULE 6.11 Filings/Return of Information Assignment of Cases after Information The following rules shall govern the assignment of misdemeanor cases and other matters within the jurisdiction of the County Courts at Law in Fort Bend County, Texas: (A) All misdemeanor proceedings presented to the County Clerk for filing shall be assigned by the County Clerk on a random basis to the County Courts at Law by mean of a blind filing process which provides for the equal distribution of new cases in such a manner that it cannot be determined to which court a case will be assigned until after said court assignment. Except as otherwise provided in these Rules, the County Clerk shall randomly assign every criminal case filed by information with uneven numbered cases being assigned to County Court at Law No. 1 and even numbered cases being assigned to County Court at Law No. 2. (B) After refiling and docketing of misdemeanor information into the County Courts at Law, the County Clerk will determine by research [based upon information provided by the District Attorney at the time of filing the information] whether the defendant named in the misdemeanor information has a prior connection to an existing case in any of the County Courts at Law. Such prior connection is defined as: (1) defendant has been accorded misdemeanor probation in one of the County Courts at Law and the probation has not
  • List of Councils in England by Type

    List of Councils in England by Type

    List of councils in England by type There are a total of 353 councils in England: Metropolitan districts (36) London boroughs (32) plus the City of London Unitary authorities (55) plus the Isles of Scilly County councils (27) District councils (201) Metropolitan districts (36) 1. Barnsley Borough Council 19. Rochdale Borough Council 2. Birmingham City Council 20. Rotherham Borough Council 3. Bolton Borough Council 21. South Tyneside Borough Council 4. Bradford City Council 22. Salford City Council 5. Bury Borough Council 23. Sandwell Borough Council 6. Calderdale Borough Council 24. Sefton Borough Council 7. Coventry City Council 25. Sheffield City Council 8. Doncaster Borough Council 26. Solihull Borough Council 9. Dudley Borough Council 27. St Helens Borough Council 10. Gateshead Borough Council 28. Stockport Borough Council 11. Kirklees Borough Council 29. Sunderland City Council 12. Knowsley Borough Council 30. Tameside Borough Council 13. Leeds City Council 31. Trafford Borough Council 14. Liverpool City Council 32. Wakefield City Council 15. Manchester City Council 33. Walsall Borough Council 16. North Tyneside Borough Council 34. Wigan Borough Council 17. Newcastle Upon Tyne City Council 35. Wirral Borough Council 18. Oldham Borough Council 36. Wolverhampton City Council London boroughs (32) 1. Barking and Dagenham 17. Hounslow 2. Barnet 18. Islington 3. Bexley 19. Kensington and Chelsea 4. Brent 20. Kingston upon Thames 5. Bromley 21. Lambeth 6. Camden 22. Lewisham 7. Croydon 23. Merton 8. Ealing 24. Newham 9. Enfield 25. Redbridge 10. Greenwich 26. Richmond upon Thames 11. Hackney 27. Southwark 12. Hammersmith and Fulham 28. Sutton 13. Haringey 29. Tower Hamlets 14.
  • Written Evidence Submitted by East Sussex County Council [ASC 021]

    Written Evidence Submitted by East Sussex County Council [ASC 021]

    Written evidence submitted by East Sussex County Council [ASC 021] • How has Covid-19 changed the landscape for long-term funding reform of the adult social care sector? The challenges facing the adult social care market prior to the pandemic are well documented and, in many cases, have been brought into sharp focus over the last 12 months. Local Authority published rates; contract arrangements (e.g. block arrangements); commissioning approaches (e.g. strategic partners) and CCG funding agreements including Better Care Fund allocations are all key funding reform considerations which sit alongside the necessity to offer choice, personalised care and high quality, safe services. Residential and nursing care There are 306 registered care homes in East Sussex – the majority are small independently run homes, which don’t have the wrap-around organisational infrastructure enjoyed by larger / national providers. In East Sussex, Local Authority placements are made across around one-third of the residential and nursing care market. At the peak of the second wave over 100 care homes in East Sussex were closed to admissions due to Covid outbreaks. Week commencing 04/01/21 there were 853 confirmed cases of Covid19 in East Sussex care home settings. During 2021, as of the week ending 19/03/2021, East Sussex has had 2,404 deaths registered in total and 1,110 of these have been attributable to COVID-19, of which 597 have occurred in hospital and 436 have occurred in care homes (LG reform data). In the two years up to April 2019, there were 26 residential and nursing home closures in East Sussex resulting in a loss of 435 beds, across all care groups.
  • IPPR | Empowering Counties: Unlocking County Devolution Deals ABOUT the AUTHORS

    IPPR | Empowering Counties: Unlocking County Devolution Deals ABOUT the AUTHORS

    REPORT EMPOWERING COUNTIES UNLOCKING COUNTY DEVOLUTION DEALS Ed Cox and Jack Hunter November 2015 © IPPR 2015 Institute for Public Policy Research ABOUT IPPR IPPR, the Institute for Public Policy Research, is the UK’s leading progressive thinktank. We are an independent charitable organisation with more than 40 staff members, paid interns and visiting fellows. Our main office is in London, with IPPR North, IPPR’s dedicated thinktank for the North of England, operating out of offices in Newcastle and Manchester. The purpose of our work is to conduct and publish the results of research into and promote public education in the economic, social and political sciences, and in science and technology, including the effect of moral, social, political and scientific factors on public policy and on the living standards of all sections of the community. IPPR 4th Floor 14 Buckingham Street London WC2N 6DF T: +44 (0)20 7470 6100 E: [email protected] www.ippr.org Registered charity no. 800065 This paper was first published in November 2015. © 2015 The contents and opinions in this paper are the authors ’ only. POSITIVE IDEAS for CHANGE CONTENTS Summary ............................................................................................................3 1. Devolution unleashed .....................................................................................9 2. Why devolve to counties? ............................................................................11 2.1 Counties and their economic opportunities ...................................................
  • Judge Emily A. Miskel

    Judge Emily A. Miskel

    Judge Emily A. Miskel 470th Judicial District Court 2100 Bloomdale Road, 2nd Floor, McKinney, Texas 75071 T: (972) 548-5670 F: (972) 548-5674 E: [email protected] Minimum Standard Health Protocols for Court Proceedings Effective August 1, 2021 – October 1, 2021 Pursuant to the Supreme Court of Texas’s 40th Emergency Order Regarding the COVID-19 State of Disaster,1 this document contains the minimum standard health protocols for court proceedings and the public attending court proceedings that will be employed in all courtrooms and throughout all public areas of the court buildings.2 Collin County courts will follow the most current d health recommendations made by the Texas Department of State Health Services (DSHS). The current recommendations can be found at https://www.dshs.texas.gov/coronavirus/ These are the minimum standards that apply in all Collin County courts and court buildings. Each court has the authority to require additional protocols.3 If a court is requiring additional protocols, those protocols will be posted on each court’s public website: • List of District Court Websites - https://www.collincountytx.gov/district_courts/Pages/default.aspx • List of County Court at Law Websites – https://www.collincountytx.gov/county_court_law/Pages/default.aspx • List of Justice Court Websites - https://www.collincountytx.gov/justices_peace/Pages/default.aspx Social Distancing 1. Unvaccinated people are encouraged to practice social distancing, also called physical distancing, within the courthouse, including in elevators, restrooms,
  • Small Claims Court Procedures

    Small Claims Court Procedures

    SMALL CLAIMS COURT PROCEDURES The Rules of Judicial Ethics prohibits this office from giving legal advice or hearing your case without the presence of the defendant or plaintiff. If you need legal counseling, we highly recommend any licensed Texas attorney. Your first meeting with the attorney is usually (but not always) free because the lawyer is trying to determine if they can be of service to you. In a civil suit any CORPORATION MUST BE REPRESENTED BY AN ATTORNEY. REMEMBER, IT IS YOUR JOB TO PRESENT ANY EVIDENCE (RECEIPTS, JOURNALS, RECORDS, POLICE REPORTS, WITNESSES, ETC) TO PROVE YOUR CASE. IF YOU FAIL TO PROVE YOUR CASE IT CAN BE DISMISSED. If you have any LEGAL QUESTIONS, contact LEGAL AID AT (915)-585-5100. Small Claims Courts are courts in which parties can settle small money disputes in a speedy, informal setting. To ensure that Small Claims Courts can be used without the help of an attorney, the Legislature established less formal procedures for these courts. The purpose of this pamphlet is to help you understand the basic procedures in these courts, but is not intended to present complete coverage of them. A Small Claims Court is a judicial forum to hear and decide civil cases involving claims for MONEY ONLY, for $10,000 or less. The court cannot require a party to return, replace, or repair property; to do something; or, to refrain from doing something. For example, you could sue a car mechanic in Small Claims Court to get back money you paid for repairs that were not made.
  • Court Reform in England

    Court Reform in England

    Comments COURT REFORM IN ENGLAND A reading of the Beeching report' suggests that the English court reform which entered into force on 1 January 1972 was the result of purely domestic considerations. The members of the Commission make no reference to the civil law countries which Great Britain will join in an important economic and political regional arrangement. Yet even a cursory examination of the effects of the reform on the administration of justice in England and Wales suggests that English courts now resemble more closely their counterparts in Western Eu- rope. It should be stated at the outset that the new organization of Eng- lish courts is by no means the result of the 1971 Act alone. The Act crowned the work of various legislative measures which have brought gradual change for a period of well over a century, including the Judicature Acts 1873-75, the Interpretation Act 1889, the Supreme Court of Judicature (Consolidation) Act 1925, the Administration of Justice Act 1933, the County Courts Act 1934, the Criminal Appeal Act 1966 and the Criminal Law Act 1967. The reform culminates a prolonged process of response to social change affecting the legal structure in England. Its effect was to divorce the organization of the courts from tradition and history in order to achieve efficiency and to adapt the courts to new tasks and duties which they must meet in new social and economic conditions. While the earlier acts, including the 1966 Criminal Appeal Act, modernized the structure of the Supreme Court of Judicature, the 1971 Act extended modern court structure to the intermediate level, creating the new Crown Court, and provided for the regular admin- istration of justice in civil matters by the High Court in England and Wales, outside the Royal Courts in London.
  • Martin V. Wegman

    Martin V. Wegman

    IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT OF OHIO HAMILTON COUNTY, OHIO CHARLES RICHARD MARTIN, II, : APPEAL NOS. C-180268 C-180308 Plaintiff-Appellant, : TRIAL NOS. A-1704203 A-1706197 vs. : O P I N I O N. DONALD A. WEGMAN, : Defendant-Appellee. : Civil Appeals From: Hamilton County Court of Common Pleas Judgment Appealed From Is: Affirmed as Modified in C-180308; Appeal Dismissed in C-180268 Date of Judgment Entry on Appeal: July 19, 2019 Harry B. Plotnick, for Plaintiff-Appellant, Frederick J. Johnson, for Defendant-Appellee. OHIO FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS CROUSE, Judge. {¶1} Plaintiff-appellant Charles Martin appeals the trial court’s dismissal of his defamation claim. We modify the judgment so that dismissal is without prejudice, and affirm as modified. Facts and Procedure {¶2} Martin initially filed a defamation claim under the case numbered A- 1704203 and, after voluntarily dismissing the claim without prejudice, refiled his claim under the case numbered A-1706197. Martin’s complaint alleged that defendant- appellee Donald Wegman “published false, misleading and defamatory statements about plaintiff in written correspondence both to government officials and on defendant’s personal Facebook account.” According to the complaint, Wegman published that Martin was an adult male member of the community who was filming defendant and his 12-year-old daughter with a drone…implying that the alleged acts were committed for immoral purposes. {¶3} Wegman filed a Civ.R. 12(B)(6) motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim upon which relief could be granted. After hearing oral argument, the trial court granted the motion and dismissed the complaint with prejudice, saying “the complaint doesn’t state enough on its face.
  • 985 EDUCATION (2) That the Revised Estimates Of

    985 EDUCATION (2) That the Revised Estimates Of

    985 EDUCATION (Note: This report was presented to the Council at its meeting on \2th Decem­ ber, 1952.) EDUCATION COMMITTEE: 4th December, 1952. Present: Councillors Brown (in the Chair), Adkins, Alien, J.P., Bailey, A. C. L. Bishop, Buckle, Collins, Duff, Gange, J.P., Leigh, J.P., C.C., Lovell, MacRae, Mason, Mrs. Milner and Sheldrake (Representative members); Messrs. F. W. Coppin and C. A. Lillingston, Rev. H. Eland Stewart, and Miss D. E. Hunt (Co-opted members); Mr. J. Barrow, C.C. (Appointed member); Mr. J. Rostron, Miss A. Robinson and Miss D. E. Ross (Members of the Youth Sub-Committee). PART I.—RECOMMENDATIONS. RECOMMENDATION I: Education Estimates of Capital Expenditure for the Year 1953/54. Your Committee has considered, and is in agreement with, recommendation I of the report of its General Purposes and Finance Sub-Committee of 4th December, 1952, relating to capital expenditure for the financial year 1953/54, details of which are set out in paragraph 61 (2nd December, 1952) of the report of the (Education) Sites and Buildings Sub-Committee. Resolved to RECOMMEND: That a resolution in the following terms be passed by the Council: That the items included in the estimates of capital expenditure, amounting to £52,365, for the financial year 1953/54, in accordance with the details now submitted, be approved and submitted to the Middlesex County Council. RECOMMENDATION II: Education Estimates on Revenue Account for the Years 1952/53 and 1953/54. Your Committee has considered, and is in agreement with, recommendation II of the report of its General Purposes and Finance Sub-Committee of 4th December, 1952, relating to the approval of estimates of income and expendi­ ture on revenue account for the financial year 1953/54, and revised estimates for 1952/53.
  • Enforcement Officers (Formerly Known As Bailiffs)

    Enforcement Officers (Formerly Known As Bailiffs)

    BRIEFING PAPER Number CBP04103, 4 June 2021 Enforcement officers By Lorraine Conway (formerly known as bailiffs) Contents: Summary 1. Introduction to enforcement agents 2. Regulation of enforcement agents 3. Complaints about enforcement agents 4. Frequently asked questions 5. Where to get debt advice 6. Recent developments 7. Effectiveness of current regulation 8. Bailiff action during Covid-19 www.parliament.uk/commons-library | intranet.parliament.uk/commons-library | [email protected] | @commonslibrary 2 Enforcement officers (formerly known as bailiffs) Contents Summary 4 1. Introduction to enforcement agents 5 1.1 What is an enforcement agent? 5 1.2 Types of enforcement agent 5 High Court enforcement officers 6 County Court bailiffs 7 Civilian Enforcement Officers 7 2. Regulation of enforcement agents 8 2.1 Overview 8 2.2 New national standards on enforcement 10 3. Complaints about enforcement agents 11 3.1 Is there a regulatory body? 11 3.2 Is there a general guide? 11 3.3 Who should I complain to? 11 3.4 Complaints about private sector enforcement agents 11 Certificated enforcement agents 11 High Court Enforcement Officers (HCEOs) 12 3.5 Complaints about court enforcement officers 13 County Court bailiff or civilian enforcement officer 13 3.6 Complaining to the creditor 13 3.7 Taking legal action 13 4. Frequently asked questions 14 4.1 When can bailiffs enter a property? 14 4.2 Are there any time restrictions? 14 4.3 Who can let a bailiff in? 14 4.4 Can bailiffs force entry? 15 4.5 How do you know it is a certificated bailiff and not a debt collector? 15 4.6 What belongings can a bailiff take? 15 4.7 Can bailiffs take other people’s belongings? 16 4.8 Can bailiffs take goods from outside of the home? 16 4.9 Are vulnerable people protected? 17 4.10 What fees can bailiffs charge? 17 5.
  • Lesson: What It Takes to Become a Judge Objective

    Lesson: What It Takes to Become a Judge Objective

    Courts in the Community Colorado Judicial Branch Office of the State Court Administrator Updated November 2020 Lesson: What it takes to become a Judge Objective: Students know how power, authority, and responsibility are distributed, shared, and limited in the Colorado judicial system. (Colorado Model Content Standards: Civics, Standard 2.2, grades 9-12) Activities: Teacher lecture (background material and lecture outline provided); class participation activity; and homework assignment. Outcomes: Students develop an understanding of how judges became judges, what criteria qualified them for the job, and what attributes they must have to maintain their positions. Grade Level: Grades 9-12 Anticipated classroom time: 45-60 minutes Message from former Court of Appeals Judge Daniel M. Taubman: Although there are about 37,000 licensed lawyers in Colorado, there are only about 390 judges. Thus, only a very small percentage of lawyers have the opportunity to serve the citizens of the State of Colorado as a judge. In almost all cases, a person must be a Colorado lawyer before becoming a judge (in some rural areas, a non-lawyer may serve as a county court judge). Whether for county court, district court, the Colorado Court of Appeals, or the Colorado Supreme Court, a judicial applicant must apply to a nominating commission that reviews his or her qualifications. Typically, the nominating commission makes three recommendations to the governor, who then appoints one of the nominees to serve as a judge. Both the nominating commission and the governor look to certain traits in order to find well-qualified judges. Among the primary criteria are open-mindedness, fairness, and lack of bias.