APPENDIX G Phase I Environmental Site Assessment

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

APPENDIX G Phase I Environmental Site Assessment APPENDIX G Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Phase-1 Environmental Services Taking the complexity out of environmental due diligence Silicon Valley Environmental Group LIMITED PHASE II SITE SCREENING November 21, 2016 Vacant Land Saratoga, Santa Clara County, California 95070 Assessor Parcel No. (APN): 389-06-20 & 389-06-21 Prepared for: Mr. Mike Sneper [email protected] Prepared by: Phase-1 Environmental Services 5216 Harwood Rd San Jose, CA 95124 (831) 422-2290 www.phase-1environmental.com Phase-1 Environmental Services 5216 Harwood Road, San Jose, CA 95124 LIMITED PHASE II SOIL SAMPLING REPORT SUBMITTED TO: SUBJECT PROPERTY: Mr. Mike Sneper APNs: 389-06-20 & 389-06-21 [email protected] Saratoga, CA 95070 3333 S. Bascom Ave., Campbell, CA Ph: (650) 771-6167 ___________________________________________________________________________________ November 21, 2016 Report # P-21103161 Page 1 of 2 History Briefing The Subject Property is being redeveloped for sensitive-receptor occupancy (retirement home facility). A Phase I ESA was performed at the Subject Property by Phase-1 ES in November 2015. This study identified that the site had a history of being part of a orchard from as early as 1944 through the mid- 1970s. To clear the Property of environmental concerns, the Phase I recommended that the near surface soils be sampled and tested in accordance with the California DTSC guidelines for previous agricultural properties. Based on the size of the Property, a total of 4 discrete samples were recommended to be collected from 0-6” below grade surface, and at a minimum, analyzed for Organo-Chlorine Pesticides (OCPs) and Arsenic. This document reports on the sampling and testing of soils from the Subject Property. All work was performed in accordance with the California DTSC and EPA Guidance for Sampling Agricultural Properties, Third Revision, dated; August 7, 2008 (copy in Attachment B). Soil Collection On November 07, 2016, a Phase-1 ES ASTM-Qualified Phase II Environmental Professional collected soil samples from 4 locations on the Property as shown on Figure 2. Soil samples were collected from between 0 and 6 inches Below Grade Surface (BGS) from each of the collection points using a spade shovel that was washed with TSP and water before, and between each sample collection. Samples were immediately placed in new 8-ounce glass sample jars, each of them discretely labeled, and placed on ice in an ice chest for transportation to a state certified analytical laboratory under documented Chain-of- Custody. Analytical Laboratory Testing The 4 samples were tested at BC Laboratories, Inc. of Bakersfield, CA (a state certified analytical laboratory) for Organochlorine Pesticides under EPA Method 8081A and for Arsenic and Copper metals under EPA Method 6010B. Laboratory analytical results and Chain-of-Custody documentation are contained in Attachment A. Lab Analyses Results Samples B-1, B-2, and B-3, contained no detectable quantities of Organochlorine Pesticides above laboratory detection limits. Sample B-4 was found to contain 0.0011 ppm of 4,4’-DDE and 0.0003 of 4,4'- DDT, which is well below residential Tier-1 ESLs. Arsenic was detected in B-1 @ 4.7 ppm, in B-2 @ 5.7 ppm, B-3 @ 4.6 ppm, and B-4 @ 3.4 ppm – all of which exceeded Tier-1 residential ESLs, however, all were within background range levels that are common for the San Francisco Bay Area region (see Attachment C 2011 study by Dylan Jacques Duvergé), and not actionable by regional standards. Copper was detected in all four samples at between 26 and 28 ppm, which are well below Tier-1 Residential ESLs. Recommendations No further environmental actions or studies regarding Organochlorine Pesticides or their respective Metals of concern are recommended for this Property. The shallow soils at this site do not appear to contain actionable levels of pesticides or metals under current regulatory agency residential and sensitive-receptor occupancy standards. Limitations This study was limited to the constituents that were analyzed for and is not representative of all materials that could exist on the site, such as fill or other import. Samples were collected from logical points in accordance with standard practices. Phase-1 ES is not responsible for conditions or materials at or on this site that were not made known or noted prior to the performance of this limited study. Respectfully submitted this 21st day of November, 2016, Phase-1 Environmental Services Stuart G. Solomon – Principal Partner Qualified Phase II Environmental Professional Figures 1) Site Vicinity Map 2) Sample/Boring Locations 3) Parcel Map 4) Aerial Photograph 5) Topographical Map Attachments A) Boring Logs, Chain-of-Custody and Laboratory Analytical Report B) California DTSC and EPA Guidance for Sampling Agricultural Properties C) Bay Area Arsenic Background Study by Dylan Jacques Duvergé SITE Legend Figure 1 N Phase-1 SITE VICINITY MAP Environmental Services COX Avenue Parcel #’s 389-06-20 & 389-06-21, Saratoga, CA 95070 W E Silicon Valley Environmental Group Project Number: P5-10-19-16 www.phase-1environmental.com S Co x A ven Office Complex ue Law Offices Dentist Endodontic Office Complex Medical Clinic Office Complex k Dentist Residential Homes e e r C a g o t a B-4 r a S B-3 B-2 B-1 SUBJECT SITE Vacant Land APN – 389-06-20 Vacant Land Vacant Land APN – 389-06-21 Vacant Land Legend Figure 2 N Phase-1 BORING LOCATIONS Environmental Services W E COX Avenue Parcel #’s 389-06-20 & 389-06-21, Saratoga, CA 95070 Silicon Valley Environmental Group Project Number: P5-10-19-16 www.phase-1environmental.com S Legend Figure 3 Phase-1 PARCEL OUTLINE Environmental Services COX Avenue Parcel #’s 389-06-20 & 389-06-21, Saratoga, CA 95070 Silicon Valley Environmental Group Project Number: P5-10-19-16 www.phase-1environmental.com Legend Figure 4 N Phase-1 AERIAL PHOTOGRAPH Environmental Services COX Avenue Parcel #’s 389-06-20 & 389-06-21, Saratoga, CA 95070 W E Silicon Valley Environmental Group Project Number: P5-10-19-16 www.phase-1environmental.com S Legend Topographical Map: Cupertino, CA Map MRC: 37122C1 Site is approx. 300' Above MSL Figure 5 N Phase-1 TOPOGRAPHICAL MAP Environmental Services COX Avenue Parcel #’s 389-06-20 & 389-06-21, Saratoga, CA 95070 W E Silicon Valley Environmental Group Project Number: P5-10-19-16 www.phase-1environmental.com S Attachment A Boring Logs, Chain-of-Custody & Laboratory Analytical Report DATE _1_1_/0_7_/_2_0_1_6__________ DRILLING CONTRACTOR _P_h_a_s_e_-_1_ E_n_v_i_ro_n_m__e_n_ta_l______ PROJECT NAME _V_a_c_a_n_t_ L_a_n_d_ _–_ S_a_r_a_to_g_a_ _C_A_______ DRILLING METHOD _4_"_ H__a_n_d_ A_u_g_e_r__________________ PROJECT NUMBER _P_5_-_1_0_-1_9_-_1_6________________ LOGGED BY _C__G_S________________________________ PROJECT LOCATION _S__a_n_ J_o_s_e_, _C_A______________ FIELD NOTES ___________________________________ GROUND ELEVATION _________________________ _______________________________________________ BORING DEPTH _6_"__________ _______________________________________________ GROUND WATER LEVEL: _______________________________________________ 1ST ENCOUNTERED _N_/_A_________ e l Depth p Odors or PID Sample ID Analyzed For Lithology SOIL DESCRIPTION (ft) m Discoloration (ppm) a S B-1 (0'-6") 8081, None Fill SILTY CLAY (CL): Light brown 1 6010B 2 (Arsenic), 6010 B 3 (Copper) 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 WELL/BORING CONSTRUCTION DETAILS: Backfilled with neat cement (Portland I/II) Phase-1 BORING LOG BORING Environmental Services Silicon Valley Environmental Group Vacant Land – Saratoga, CA B-1 APN’s: 389-06-20 & 389-06-21 www.phase-1environmental.com DATE _1_1_/0_7_/_2_0_1_6__________ DRILLING CONTRACTOR _P_h_a_s_e_-_1_ E_n_v_i_ro_n_m__e_n_ta_l______ PROJECT NAME _V_a_c_a_n_t_ L_a_n_d_ _–_ S_a_r_a_to_g_a_ _C_A_______ DRILLING METHOD _4_"_ H__a_n_d_ A_u_g_e_r__________________ PROJECT NUMBER _P_5_-_1_0_-1_9_-_1_6________________ LOGGED BY _C__G_S________________________________ PROJECT LOCATION _S__a_n_ J_o_s_e_, _C_A______________ FIELD NOTES ___________________________________ GROUND ELEVATION _________________________ _______________________________________________ BORING DEPTH _6_"__________ _______________________________________________ GROUND WATER LEVEL: _______________________________________________ 1ST ENCOUNTERED _N_/_A_________ e l Depth p Odors or PID Sample ID Analyzed For Lithology SOIL DESCRIPTION (ft) m Discoloration (ppm) a S B-2 (0'-6") 8081, None Fill SILTY CLAY (CL): Light brown 1 6010B 2 (Arsenic), 6010 B 3 (Copper) 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 WELL/BORING CONSTRUCTION DETAILS: Backfilled with neat cement (Portland I/II) Phase-1 BORING LOG BORING Environmental Services Silicon Valley Environmental Group Vacant Land – Saratoga, CA B-2 APN’s: 389-06-20 & 389-06-21 www.phase-1environmental.com DATE _1_1_/0_7_/_2_0_1_6__________ DRILLING CONTRACTOR _P_h_a_s_e_-_1_ E_n_v_i_ro_n_m__e_n_ta_l______ PROJECT NAME _V_a_c_a_n_t_ L_a_n_d_ _–_ S_a_r_a_to_g_a_ _C_A_______ DRILLING METHOD _4_"_ H__a_n_d_ A_u_g_e_r__________________ PROJECT NUMBER _P_5_-_1_0_-1_9_-_1_6________________ LOGGED BY _C__G_S________________________________ PROJECT LOCATION _S__a_n_ J_o_s_e_, _C_A______________ FIELD NOTES ___________________________________ GROUND ELEVATION _________________________ _______________________________________________ BORING DEPTH _6_"__________ _______________________________________________ GROUND WATER LEVEL: _______________________________________________ 1ST ENCOUNTERED _N_/_A_________ e
Recommended publications
  • Chemical Name Federal P Code CAS Registry Number Acutely
    Acutely / Extremely Hazardous Waste List Federal P CAS Registry Acutely / Extremely Chemical Name Code Number Hazardous 4,7-Methano-1H-indene, 1,4,5,6,7,8,8-heptachloro-3a,4,7,7a-tetrahydro- P059 76-44-8 Acutely Hazardous 6,9-Methano-2,4,3-benzodioxathiepin, 6,7,8,9,10,10- hexachloro-1,5,5a,6,9,9a-hexahydro-, 3-oxide P050 115-29-7 Acutely Hazardous Methanimidamide, N,N-dimethyl-N'-[2-methyl-4-[[(methylamino)carbonyl]oxy]phenyl]- P197 17702-57-7 Acutely Hazardous 1-(o-Chlorophenyl)thiourea P026 5344-82-1 Acutely Hazardous 1-(o-Chlorophenyl)thiourea 5344-82-1 Extremely Hazardous 1,1,1-Trichloro-2, -bis(p-methoxyphenyl)ethane Extremely Hazardous 1,1a,2,2,3,3a,4,5,5,5a,5b,6-Dodecachlorooctahydro-1,3,4-metheno-1H-cyclobuta (cd) pentalene, Dechlorane Extremely Hazardous 1,1a,3,3a,4,5,5,5a,5b,6-Decachloro--octahydro-1,2,4-metheno-2H-cyclobuta (cd) pentalen-2- one, chlorecone Extremely Hazardous 1,1-Dimethylhydrazine 57-14-7 Extremely Hazardous 1,2,3,4,10,10-Hexachloro-6,7-epoxy-1,4,4,4a,5,6,7,8,8a-octahydro-1,4-endo-endo-5,8- dimethanonaph-thalene Extremely Hazardous 1,2,3-Propanetriol, trinitrate P081 55-63-0 Acutely Hazardous 1,2,3-Propanetriol, trinitrate 55-63-0 Extremely Hazardous 1,2,4,5,6,7,8,8-Octachloro-4,7-methano-3a,4,7,7a-tetra- hydro- indane Extremely Hazardous 1,2-Benzenediol, 4-[1-hydroxy-2-(methylamino)ethyl]- 51-43-4 Extremely Hazardous 1,2-Benzenediol, 4-[1-hydroxy-2-(methylamino)ethyl]-, P042 51-43-4 Acutely Hazardous 1,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane 96-12-8 Extremely Hazardous 1,2-Propylenimine P067 75-55-8 Acutely Hazardous 1,2-Propylenimine 75-55-8 Extremely Hazardous 1,3,4,5,6,7,8,8-Octachloro-1,3,3a,4,7,7a-hexahydro-4,7-methanoisobenzofuran Extremely Hazardous 1,3-Dithiolane-2-carboxaldehyde, 2,4-dimethyl-, O- [(methylamino)-carbonyl]oxime 26419-73-8 Extremely Hazardous 1,3-Dithiolane-2-carboxaldehyde, 2,4-dimethyl-, O- [(methylamino)-carbonyl]oxime.
    [Show full text]
  • Enhanced Extraction of Heavy Metals in the Two-Step Process with the Mixed Culture of Lactobacillus Bulgaricus and Streptococcus Thermophilus
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Muroran-IT Academic Resource Archive Enhanced extraction of heavy metals in the two-step process with the mixed culture of Lactobacillus bulgaricus and Streptococcus thermophilus 著者 CHANG Young-Cheol, CHOI DuBok, KIKUCHI Shintaro journal or Bioresource Technology publication title volume 103 number 1 page range 477-480 year 2012-01 URL http://hdl.handle.net/10258/665 doi: info:doi/10.1016/j.biortech.2011.09.059 Enhanced extraction of heavy metals in the two-step process with the mixed culture of Lactobacillus bulgaricus and Streptococcus thermophilus 著者 CHANG Young-Cheol, CHOI DuBok, KIKUCHI Shintaro journal or Bioresource Technology publication title volume 103 number 1 page range 477-480 year 2012-01 URL http://hdl.handle.net/10258/665 doi: info:doi/10.1016/j.biortech.2011.09.059 Enhanced Extraction of Heavy Metals in the Two-Step Process with the Mixed Culture of Lactobacillus bulgaricus and Streptococcus thermophilus Young-Cheol Chang1, DuBok Choi2*, and Shintaro Kikuchi1 1Division of Applied Sciences, College of Environmental Technology, Graduate School of Engineering, Muroran Institute of Technology, 27-1 Mizumoto, Muroran 050-8585, Hokkaido, Japan, 2 Biotechnology Lab, BK Company R&D Center, Gunsan 579-879, and Department of Pharmacy, College of Pharmacy, Chungbuk National University, Cheongju 361-763, Korea. *Corresponding author: DuBok Choi E-mail: [email protected] 1 Abstract For biological extraction of heavy metals from chromated copper arsenate (CCA) treated wood, different bacteria were investigated. The extraction rates of heavy metals using Lactobacillus bulgaricus and Streptococcus thermophilus were highest.
    [Show full text]
  • European Patent Office
    (19) *EP003643305A1* (11) EP 3 643 305 A1 (12) EUROPEAN PATENT APPLICATION (43) Date of publication: (51) Int Cl.: 29.04.2020 Bulletin 2020/18 A61K 31/196 (2006.01) A61K 31/403 (2006.01) A61K 31/405 (2006.01) A61K 31/616 (2006.01) (2006.01) (21) Application number: 18202657.5 A61P 35/00 (22) Date of filing: 25.10.2018 (84) Designated Contracting States: (72) Inventors: AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB • LAEMMERMANN, Ingo GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO 1170 Wien (AT) PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR • GRILLARI, Johannes Designated Extension States: 2102 Bisamberg (AT) BA ME • PILS, Vera Designated Validation States: 1160 Wien (AT) KH MA MD TN • GRUBER, Florian 1050 Wien (AT) (71) Applicants: • NARZT, Marie-Sophie • Universität für Bodenkultur Wien 1140 Wien (AT) 1180 Wien (AT) • Medizinische Universität Wien (74) Representative: Loidl, Manuela Bettina et al 1090 Wien (AT) REDL Life Science Patent Attorneys Donau-City-Straße 11 1220 Wien (AT) (54) COMPOSITIONS FOR THE ELIMINATION OF SENESCENT CELLS (57) The invention relates to a composition compris- ing senescent cells. The invention further relates to an ing one or more inhibitors capable of inhibiting at least in vitro method of identifying senescent cells in a subject two of cyclooxygenase-1 (COX-1), cyclooxygenase-2 and to a method of identifying candidate compounds for (COX-2) and lipoxygenase for use in selectively eliminat- the selective elimination of senescent cells. EP 3 643 305 A1 Printed by Jouve, 75001 PARIS (FR) 1 EP 3 643 305 A1 2 Description al.
    [Show full text]
  • Guidance for Assessing Chemical Contaminant Data for Use in Fish Advisories
    United States Office of Water EPA 823-B-00-007 Environmental Protection (4305) November 2000 Agency Guidance for Assessing Chemical Contaminant Data for Use in Fish Advisories Volume 1 Fish Sampling and Analysis Third Edition Guidance for Assessing Chemical Contaminant Data for Use in Fish Advisories Volume 1: Fish Sampling and Analysis Third Edition Office of Science and Technology Office of Water U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Washington, DC United States Environmental Protection Agency (4305) Washington, DC 20460 Official Business Penalty for Private Use $300 Guidance for Assessing Chemical Contamin Volume 1: Fish Sampling and Analysis TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS Section Page Figures ................................................... vii Tables ................................................... ix Acknowledgments .......................................... xii Acronyms ................................................ xiii Executive Summary .......................................ES-1 1 Introduction ........................................... 1-1 1.1 Historical Perspective ............................... 1-1 1.1.1 Establishment of the Fish Contaminant Workgroup . 1-3 1.1.2 Development of a National Fish Advisory Database . 1-3 1.2 Purpose ......................................... 1-10 1.3 Objectives ....................................... 1-13 1.4 Relationship of Manual to Other Guidance Documents ..... 1-15 1.5 Contents of Volume 1 .............................. 1-15 1.6 New Information And Revisions to Volume 1 ............
    [Show full text]
  • Heavier Pnictogens – Treasures for Optical Electronic and Reactivity Tuning Dalton Transactions
    Dalton Volume 48 Number 14 14 April 2019 Pages 4431–4744 Transactions An international journal of inorganic chemistry rsc.li/dalton ISSN 1477-9226 FRONTIER Andreas Orthaber et al. Heavier pnictogens – treasures for optical electronic and reactivity tuning Dalton Transactions View Article Online FRONTIER View Journal | View Issue Heavier pnictogens – treasures for optical electronic and reactivity tuning Cite this: Dalton Trans., 2019, 48, 4460 Joshua P. Green, † Jordann A. L. Wells † and Andreas Orthaber * We highlight recent advances in organopnictogen chemistry contrasting the properties of lighter and heavier pnictogens. Exploring new bonding situations, discovering unprecedented reactivities and produ- cing fascinating opto-electronic materials are some of the most prominent directions of current organo- Received 7th February 2019, pnicogen research. Expanding the chemical toolbox towards the heavier group 15 elements will continue Accepted 19th February 2019 to create new opportunities to tailor molecular properties for small molecule activation/reactivity and DOI: 10.1039/c9dt00574a materials applications alike. This frontier article illustrates the elemental substitution approach in selected rsc.li/dalton literature examples. Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported Licence. Introduction cally realised and fundamental work has continued to fasci- nate researchers around the world. More recently, exciting The discovery of phosphorus by Hennig Brand in 1669 pic- news of arsenic thriving species of bacteria5 have then been tured in the famous painting by Joseph Wright of Derby was disproven to incorporate arsenate.6 On the other hand, newly the beginning of pnictogen (Pn) chemistry (Fig. 1). Discoveries developed synthetic routes have made previously scarce or ffi that followed the incidental P4 preparation included the devel- di cult to handle building blocks readily available, with opment of salvarsan (1), 3-amino-4-hydroxiphenyl arsenic(I), broader applications of these systems now being studied.
    [Show full text]
  • Remember That Whenever You Take an Exam, You Are Really Taking Two Tests
    Chem 135, Fall 2018, Exam 3 NAME: SID: Chemistry 135, Third Exam November 7, 2018 Please only turn this page once instructed to do so by the instructor. This exam will be worth 15% of your overall grade. Please read all of the instructions/questions carefully and answer the question in the space provided or indicated. There should 12 total pages containing 10 multi-part questions. Be sure to transfer any answers you wish to receive credit for to the space provided. No calculators, phones, electronic devices, etc. may be used during this exam. Good luck! Questions Question Points Question # Points 1 16 6 24 2 17 7 16 3 20 8 15 4 33 9 22 5 21 10 14 Total 198 Remember that whenever you take an exam, you are really taking two tests. The first is a test of your knowledge from the class. The second, and more important, is a test of integrity: that the answers you put down represent your answers and not someone else’s. Please make sure to pass the more important test! You will not need any calculators, phones, electronic devices, headphones, etc. to complete this exam (indeed, they will slow you down), so please make sure these are put away. Pre-Exam Survey: please help us understand the study habits of Chem 135 students and fill out this survey (3 questions) while you wait for the exam to start. There is no incorrect answer – I’m just trying to collect data on how to help students in Chem 135 succeed. ~Prof.
    [Show full text]
  • Citric Acid Cycle
    CITRIC ACID CYCLE 1 Oxidation of Pyruvate under Aerobic Conditions: • The Oxidation of Pyruvate to Acetyl-CoA is the Irreversible Route from Glycolysis to the Citric Acid Cycle • Pyruvate, formed in the cytosol, is transported into the mitochondrion by a proton symporter. Inside the mitochondrion, pyruvate is oxidatively decarboxylated to acetyl-CoA by a multienzyme complex that is associated with the inner mitochondrial membrane, known as Pyruvate Dehydrogenase (PDH). 2 • PDH is an Irreversible Mitochondrial Enzyme. PDH Composed of Three Enzymes & Five Coenzymes. • PDH & all f the -ketoacid dehydrogenase complexes are enzyme complexes composed of multiple subunits of three different enzymes, E1, E2, and E3. 3 • E1 is an -ketoacid decarboxylase or Dehydrogenase contains thiamine pyrophosphate (TPP) which catalyzes the Decarboxylation of the carboxyl group of the -keto acid. • E2 is a transacylase containing lipoate; it transfers the acyl portion of the -keto acid from thiamine to CoASH. • E3 is dihydrolipoyl dehydrogenase, transfers the electrons from reduced lipoate to its tightly bound FAD molecule, thereby oxidizing lipoate back to its original disulfide form. 4 Pyruvate Dehydrogenase Complex 5 Coenzymes of Pyruvate Dehydrogenase Complex •Thiamin Pyrophosphate (TPP) in the PDH: • The acyl portion of the -keto acid is transferred by TPP on E1 to lipoate on E2. Then, E2 transfers the acyl group from lipoate to CoASH. • This process has reduced the lipoyl disulfide bond to sulfhydryl groups (dihydrolipoyl). 6 Lipoic acid & Transacylase Enzyme •Lipoate is attached to the transacylase enzyme (E2) through its carboxyl group & the terminal -NH2 of a lysine of the E2. •The oxidized lipoate disulfide form is reduced as it accepts the acyl group from TPP attached to E1.
    [Show full text]
  • Arsenic Hazards to Fish, Wildlife, and Invertebrates: a Synoptic Review
    Biological Report 85(1.12) Contaminant Hazard Reviews January 1988 Report No. 12 ARSENIC HAZARDS TO FISH, WILDLIFE, AND INVERTEBRATES: A SYNOPTIC REVIEW by Ronald Eisler U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Patuxent Wildlife Research Center Laurel, MD 20708 SUMMARY Arsenic (As) is a relatively common element that occurs in air, water, soil, and all living tissues. It ranks 20th in abundance in the earth's crust, 14th in seawater, and 12th in the human body. Arsenic is a teratogen and carcinogen that can traverse placental barriers and produce fetal death and malformations in many species of mammals. Although it is carcinogenic in humans, evidence for arsenic- induced carcinogenicity in other mammals is scarce. Paradoxically, evidence is accumulating that arsenic is nutritionally essential or beneficial. Arsenic deficiency effects, such as poor growth, reduced survival, and inhibited reproduction, have been recorded in mammals fed diets containing <0.05 mg As/kg, but not in those fed diets with 0.35 mg As/kg. At comparatively low doses, arsenic stimulates growth and development in various species of plants and animals. Most arsenic produced domestically is used in the manufacture of agricultural products such as insecticides, herbicides, fungicides, algicides, wood preservatives, and growth stimulants for plants and animals. Living resources are exposed to arsenic by way of atmospheric emissions from smelters, coal-fired power plants, and arsenical herbicide sprays; from water contaminated by mine tailings, smelter wastes, and natural mineralization; and from diet, especially from consumption of marine biota. Arsenic concentrations are usually low (<1.0 mg/kg fresh weight) in most living organisms but are elevated in marine biota (in which arsenic occurs as arsenobetaine and poses little risk to organisms or their consumer) and in plants and animals from areas that are naturally arseniferous or are near industrial manufacturers and agricultural users of arsenicals.
    [Show full text]
  • Toxicological Profile for Arsenic
    TOXICOLOGICAL PROFILE FOR ARSENIC U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES Public Health Service Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry August 2007 ARSENIC ii DISCLAIMER The use of company or product name(s) is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry. ARSENIC iii UPDATE STATEMENT A Toxicological Profile for Arsenic, Draft for Public Comment was released in September 2005. This edition supersedes any previously released draft or final profile. Toxicological profiles are revised and republished as necessary. For information regarding the update status of previously released profiles, contact ATSDR at: Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry Division of Toxicology and Environmental Medicine/Applied Toxicology Branch 1600 Clifton Road NE Mailstop F-32 Atlanta, Georgia 30333 ARSENIC iv This page is intentionally blank. v FOREWORD This toxicological profile is prepared in accordance with guidelines developed by the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (ATSDR) and the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). The original guidelines were published in the Federal Register on April 17, 1987. Each profile will be revised and republished as necessary. The ATSDR toxicological profile succinctly characterizes the toxicologic and adverse health effects information for the hazardous substance described therein. Each peer-reviewed profile identifies and reviews the key literature that describes a hazardous substance's toxicologic properties. Other pertinent literature is also presented, but is described in less detail than the key studies. The profile is not intended to be an exhaustive document; however, more comprehensive sources of specialty information are referenced. The focus of the profiles is on health and toxicologic information; therefore, each toxicological profile begins with a public health statement that describes, in nontechnical language, a substance's relevant toxicological properties.
    [Show full text]
  • Enzymatic Regulation in the Liver of the Freeze- Tolerant Wood Frog in Metabolically Depressed States
    Enzymatic Regulation in the Liver of the Freeze- Tolerant Wood Frog in Metabolically Depressed States by Ranim Saleem A thesis Submitted to the Faculty of Graduate and Postdoctoral Affairs in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science Biology, Specialization in Biochemistry Carleton University Ottawa, Ontario © 2020 Ranim Saleem The undersigned hereby recommend to the Faculty of Graduate Studies and Research acceptance of this thesis Enzymatic Regulation in the Liver of the Freeze- Tolerant Wood Frog in Metabolically Depressed States Submitted by Ranim Saleem In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science ______________________________ Chair, Department of Biology ______________________________ Thesis Supervisor Carleton University II Abstract The wood frog, Rana sylvatica, can tolerate high degrees of freeze-tolerance, a stress that also requires anoxia, dehydration and hyperglycemia tolerance. Frozen wood frogs show no heartbeat, brain activity, muscle movement or breathing, but phenomenally return to normal once thawed. Control of enzymatic activity is crucial for regulating metabolism and it is imperative for wood frog survival. This thesis investigates the properties of two key enzymes metabolic enzymes, glutamate dehydrogenase and glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase in liver of the wood frogs exposed to freezing, dehydration and anoxia. Current data show that changes in activity, substrate affinity and stability of the enzymes play a major role in their regulation to support the survival of the wood frog during stress, and these regulations are partly controlled by post-translational modifications. Therefore, these enzymes undergo regulation at the level of posttranslational modification to contribute to the overall readjustment of energy production in the wood frog.
    [Show full text]
  • The Chemistry of Arsenic, Antimony and Bismuth
    1 The Chemistry of Arsenic, Antimony and Bismuth Neil Burford, Yuen-ying Carpenter, Eamonn Conrad and Cheryl D.L. Saunders Department of Chemistry, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, B3H 4J3, Canada Arsenic, antimony and bismuth are the heavier pnictogen (Group 15) elements and consistent with their lighter congeners, nitrogen and phosphorus, they adopt the ground state electron configuration ns2np3. Arsenic and antimony are considered to be metalloids and bismuth is metallic, while nitrogen and phosphorus are non-metals. Arsenic and antimony are renowned for their toxicity or negative bioactivity [1, 2] but bismuth is well known to provide therapeutic responses or demonstrate a positive bioactivity [3].Asa background to the biological and medicinal chemistry of these elements, the fundamental chemical properties of arsenic, antimony and bismuth are presented in this introductory chapter. 1.1 Properties of the Elements Selected fundamental parameters that define the heavier pnictogen elements are summa- rized in Table 1.1 [4]. While arsenic and bismuth are monoisotopic, antimony exists as two substantially abundantCOPYRIGHTED naturally occurring isotopes. All isotopesMATERIAL of the heavy pnictogens are NMR active nuclei, indicating that the nuclear spin will interact with an applied magnetic field. However, as the nuclear spins of these isotopes are all quadrupolar, NMR spectra generally consist of broad peaks and provide limited information. The atoms As, Sb and Bi all have the same effective nuclear charge (Zeff ¼ 6.30, Slater), which estimates the charge Biological Chemistry of Arsenic, Antimony and Bismuth Edited by Hongzhe Sun Ó 2011 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd 2 The Chemistry of Arsenic, Antimony and Bismuth Table 1.1 Elemental parameters for arsenic, antimony and bismuth (adapted with permission from [4]).
    [Show full text]
  • Dissolved Organic Phosphorus Enhances Arsenate Bioaccumulation and Biotransformation in Microcystis Aeruginosa*
    Environmental Pollution 252 (2019) 1755e1763 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Environmental Pollution journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/envpol Dissolved organic phosphorus enhances arsenate bioaccumulation and biotransformation in Microcystis aeruginosa* ** * Zhenhong Wang a, b, d, , Herong Gui b, Zhuanxi Luo c, d, , Zhuo Zhen c, Changzhou Yan c, Baoshan Xing d a College of Chemistry and Environment, Fujian Province Key Laboratory of Modern Analytical Science and Separation Technology, Minnan Normal University, Zhangzhou 363000, China b National Engineering Research Center of Coal Mine Water Hazard Controlling (Suzhou University), Suzhou, Anhui, 234000, China c Key Laboratory of Urban Environment and Health, Institute of Urban Environment, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Xiamen 361021, China d Stockbridge School of Agriculture, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA 01003, USA article info abstract Article history: Only limited information is available on the effects of dissolved organic phosphorus (DOP) on arsenate Received 1 April 2019 (As(V)) bioaccumulation and biotransformation in organisms. In this study, we examined the influence of Received in revised form three different DOP forms (b-sodium glycerophosphate (bP), adenosine 50-triphosphate (ATP), and D- 29 June 2019 Glucose-6-phosphate disodium (GP) salts) and inorganic phosphate (IP) on As(V) toxicity, accumulation, Accepted 29 June 2019 and biotransformation in Microcystis aeruginosa. Results showed that M. aeruginosa utilized the three DOP Available online 3 July 2019 forms to sustain its growth. At a subcellular level, the higher phosphorus (P) distribution in metal-sensitive fractions (MSF) observed in the IP treatments could explain the comparatively lower toxic stress of algae Keywords: Arsenate compared to the DOP treatments.
    [Show full text]