Indians, Quakers, and the Negotiation of American Imperialism, 1754-1846

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Indians, Quakers, and the Negotiation of American Imperialism, 1754-1846 University of Pennsylvania ScholarlyCommons Publicly Accessible Penn Dissertations 2016 Cultivating Empire: Indians, Quakers, and the Negotiation of American Imperialism, 1754-1846 Lori J. Daggar University of Pennsylvania, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.upenn.edu/edissertations Part of the History Commons Recommended Citation Daggar, Lori J., "Cultivating Empire: Indians, Quakers, and the Negotiation of American Imperialism, 1754-1846" (2016). Publicly Accessible Penn Dissertations. 1675. https://repository.upenn.edu/edissertations/1675 This paper is posted at ScholarlyCommons. https://repository.upenn.edu/edissertations/1675 For more information, please contact [email protected]. Cultivating Empire: Indians, Quakers, and the Negotiation of American Imperialism, 1754-1846 Abstract This dissertation examines the ways in which indigenous peoples and missionaries, specifically Quakers (Society of Friends), contributed to the development of the American empire in the late eighteenth and nineteenth centuries. The U.S. civilization plan, in which Friends were central participants, offered agricultural education to American Indian men and, for women, instruction in the “domestic arts” as part of a broader mission complex. Far from being simply a means to “assimilate the Indians,” the mission complex was central to U.S. imperial and economic development, and its methods, endurance, and character grew out of a particular historical moment and as the result of a negotiation of Indians’ and Euroamericans’ goals and motivations. In order to investigate that negotiation, “Cultivating Empire” follows the evolution of diplomacy and agricultural mission work in the Ohio Country as a case study, and it draws upon individuals’ journals, family papers, account books and receipts, as well as missionary correspondences, meeting minutes from the Society of Friends, and various papers of federal, state, and territorial governments. Reading Euroamerican-produced sources against the grain in conjunction with sources such as Hendrick Aupaumut’s (Mohican) invaluable journals, moreover, offers means to bring indigenous politics to bear on this history, and it offers a top-down and bottom-up glimpse of the making of American empire. Such work reveals that the Society of Friends and its members, and their cooperation with the U.S. federal government, in many ways established the paradigm for the United States’ model of “philanthropic” empire beginning in the late eighteenth century. It also demonstrates that the society’s work was foundational for the development of the federal government’s relationship with non- governmental organizations and imperial policies abroad. Quaker diplomacy and agricultural missions also, however, offered Native peoples a powerful discourse and innovative means to continue to negotiate for power into the twenty-first century. U.S. state officials, Quaker missionaries, Euroamerican immigrants, and indigenous peoples together, then, produced the paradigms of U.S. empire in North America and the world in ways that had lasting consequences. Degree Type Dissertation Degree Name Doctor of Philosophy (PhD) Graduate Group History First Advisor Daniel K. Richter Keywords Economic Development, Indian policy, Missionaries, Native Americans, Ohio Country, US empire Subject Categories History This dissertation is available at ScholarlyCommons: https://repository.upenn.edu/edissertations/1675 CULTIVATING EMPIRE: QUAKERS, INDIANS, AND THE NEGOTIATION OF AMERICAN IMPERIALISM, 1754-1846 © 2016 Lori J. Daggar ! iii Acknowledgments! I have accumulated many debts. Thanks are due to the William L. Clements Library at the University of Michigan, the Society for Historians of American Foreign Relations, the McNeil Center for Early American Studies, and the University of Pennsylvania for the generous financial support that made the researching and writing of this project possible. I am also grateful to the many archivists, researchers, and staff members at the Clements Library, the National Archives in Washington, D.C., Haverford College, Swarthmore College, the Ohio History Center, Indiana State Library, Glen Black Laboratory for Archaeology at Indiana University, Newberry Library, Cornell University, Historical Society of Pennsylvania, and the Library Company of Philadelphia who offered their expertise and kindness and made my archival research a joy. Christopher Densmore at Swarthmore College deserves special thanks for offering this project his seemingly limitless knowledge of Quaker-Native relations early on, while Wayne Huxhold at Indiana University's Ethnohistory Archive merits a hearty "thank you" for making that archive feel like home. For their suggestions and willingness to read various portions of the dissertation, my thanks go to Gregory Ablavsky, Andrew Cayton, Jamie Forde, James Hill, Samantha Seeley, Timothy Shannon, and David Silverman. Each made this project better. Special thanks to Drew Cayton who encouraged me to stick with my big claims, even as he pushed me to refine my ideas. With his passing, the field has lost one of its kindest giants. Thanks, too, to my wonderful writing group members. Abigail Cooper, Elizabeth Della iv Zazzera, Danielle Holtz, Noria Litaker, and Emma Teitleman, thanks for reading and for sharing your expertise and smarts with me. Tom Lappas, Tim Thibodeau, and Neven Fisher at Nazareth College have supported my academic career since the beginning. Their enthusiasm and willingness to field questions and chat over coffee throughout my graduate career went far above and beyond the call of duty. These three are true exemplars of the best in the profession, and they are a large part of why I ended up in graduate school and why I so look forward to working with my own students. At the University of Pennsylvania, Kathy Brown proved that her mentorship skills matched the level of excellence so observable in her scholarship. Robert St. George, meanwhile, never failed to push my thinking in creative directions. I could not have asked for a more well-rounded committee. My advisor and the fearless leader of my dissertation committee, Dan Richter, knows better than anyone the bumps, bruises, and triumphs that marked this project's path. I am incapable of articulating the debt I owe him for his enthusiasm, guidance, and unflagging support. I'll never forget when, upon asking him to submit a five-minute online recommendation form, he responded with a characteristically-Dan, "I'd even fill out the fifteen-minute version!" Thanks, Dan, for always putting in the extra ten minutes. To the many friends (and excellent colleagues) who endured and enjoyed graduate school with me at Penn and at the McNeil Center for Early American Studies over the years and who made Philadelphia home: thank you. Abby Cooper, Demetri Debe, Sean Dempsey, Elizabeth Della Zazzera, Jack Dwiggins, Anne Fleming, Alex Hazanov, Emma Hazanov, Brenna Holland, Dani Holtz, Jessica Linker, Noria Litaker, v Hope McGrath, Emily Merrill, Alexandra Montgomery, Jennifer Rodgers, Kelsey Salvesen: you are all complicit in the completion of this dissertation. A special thank you to Jamie Forde who offered steadfast support as my graduate career came to a close. Lastly, my Rochester friends and family gave me an excuse to stock up on Wegmans groceries and, more importantly, kept me grounded throughout this journey. Kelli and Winston, thanks for the absurd and the serious. Jackie, Jenn, and Jesse, thank you for your generous patience. Alexander, Mackenzie, and Andrew, thanks for distracting me at all the right moments. Mom, thanks for listening; Dad, thanks for talking about capitalism with me for far too long and on far too many occasions; to both of you, thanks for your love and support through it all. vi ABSTRACT CULTIVATING EMPIRE: INDIANS, QUAKERS, AND THE NEGOTIATION OF AMERICAN IMPERIALISM, 1754-1846 Lori J. Daggar Daniel K. Richter This dissertation examines the ways in which indigenous peoples and missionaries, specifically Quakers (Society of Friends), contributed to the development of the American empire in the late eighteenth and nineteenth centuries. The U.S. civilization plan, in which Friends were central participants, offered agricultural education to American Indian men and, for women, instruction in the “domestic arts” as part of a broader mission complex. Far from being simply a means to “assimilate the Indians,” the mission complex was central to U.S. imperial and economic development, and its methods, endurance, and character grew out of a particular historical moment and as the result of a negotiation of Indians’ and Euroamericans’ goals and motivations. In order to investigate that negotiation, “Cultivating Empire” follows the evolution of diplomacy and agricultural mission work in the Ohio Country as a case study, and it draws upon individuals’ journals, family papers, account books and receipts, as well as missionary correspondences, meeting minutes from the Society of Friends, and various papers of federal, state, and territorial governments. Reading Euroamerican-produced sources against the grain in conjunction with sources such as Hendrick Aupaumut’s (Mohican) invaluable journals, moreover, offers means to bring indigenous politics to bear on this vii history, and it offers a top-down and bottom-up glimpse of the making of American empire. Such work reveals that the Society of Friends and its members, and their cooperation with the U.S. federal government, in many ways established
Recommended publications
  • Allen County/Fort Wayne Comprehensive Plan
    A COMPREHENSIVE PLAN FOR ALLEN COUNTY AND FORT WAYNE EXISTING CONDITIONS REPORT Environmental Stewardship 1.0 OVERVIEW 1.1 Report Purpose The purpose of this report is to provide baseline information, key findings, and identification of key issues associated with the natural resources of the Allen County/Fort Wayne, Indiana project area. Information documented in this report will be used as a basis for informing planning policy decisions in formulation of a Joint County/City Comprehensive Plan. Tables and Figures referenced in the text appear at the end of this document in Appendices A and B, respectively. 1.2 Project Area The project area encompasses all of Allen County, including the City of Fort Wayne, Allen County townships, incorporated places, and unincorporated areas of the County. Figure 1 shows a map of Allen County and major political jurisdictions located within its boundaries. Total land area covered by the Allen County/Fort Wayne project area is 422,407 acres. Plan-it-Allen 1 2.0 EXISTING CONDITIONS INVENTORY 2.1 Physiography Allen County lies at the juncture of three distinct physiographic regions – the Steuben Morainal Lakes Area, the Tipton Till Plains, and the Maumee Lacustrine Plain. The county also lies across a major drainage divide between Lake Erie and the Mississippi River. This divide runs generally north/south through the western portion of the county. Figure 2 shows the principal physiographic regions and features in Allen County. The Steuben Morainal Lakes Area occupies the northern portion of the county. This area is characterized by hummocky, relatively rugged terrain that is the result of glaciation.
    [Show full text]
  • Our Rich History Is Not Forgotten: the Lchs Historical Marker Program
    OUR RICH HISTORY IS NOT FORGOTTEN: THE LCHS HISTORICAL MARKER PROGRAM Logan County has a rich and diverse history that rivals any of the other counties in Ohio. From prehistoric Paleo Indians who hunted the great mastodons that once roamed this area, to the Shawnee, Wyandot and other historic tribes that called it home, to the white settlement of the area, to its heyday as a railroad artery, to its Million Dollar Playground at Indian Lake, to the present, Logan County’s history has been one of immense interest and importance. The Historical Society has preserved and promoted Logan County’s history in many ways. One has been the historical marker program. The Society first began erecting the markers in the 1940s. Many of the early markers recognized the importance of historic Indians in Logan County’s past. Over the next several decades the Society erected many more markers commemorating important people, sites and events that affected Logan County’s history and development. The Society is continuing this practice today with new markers and replacing older ones that have been damaged or lost. The Historical Society is not the only entity that has celebrated the county’s history through markers. Several of the villages in Logan County have erected monuments for certain historical events or people in their past. The county also has a few markers that individuals or organizations have sponsored. These markers, like those of the Society, were erected to commemorate people, events, and sites that helped shape Logan County’s history. ZANE-KENTON MEMORIAL—Route 5 at south edge of Zanesfield.
    [Show full text]
  • In Search of the Indiana Lenape
    IN SEARCH OF THE INDIANA LENAPE: A PREDICTIVE SUMMARY OF THE ARCHAEOLOGICAL IMPACT OF THE LENAPE LIVING ALONG THE WHITE RIVER IN INDIANA FROM 1790 - 1821 A THESIS SUBMITTED TO THE GRADUATE SCHOOL IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF ARTS BY JESSICA L. YANN DR. RONALD HICKS, CHAIR BALL STATE UNIVERSITY MUNCIE, INDIANA DECEMBER 2009 Table of Contents Figures and Tables ........................................................................................................................ iii Chapter 1: Introduction ................................................................................................................ 1 Research Goals ............................................................................................................................ 1 Background .................................................................................................................................. 2 Chapter 2: Theory and Methods ................................................................................................. 6 Explaining Contact and Its Material Remains ............................................................................. 6 Predicting the Intensity of Change and its Effects on Identity................................................... 14 Change and the Lenape .............................................................................................................. 16 Methods ....................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Department of Economics University of Victoria Carl Mosk Economics 327, Spring 2013
    Department of Economics University of Victoria Carl Mosk Economics 327, Spring 2013 Economic History of North America [CRN: 21844] Course Outline and Reading List [I] Introduction This is a course in the economic history of North America, namely the economic history of Canada, the United States and Mexico over the period 1500-1940. The main focus of the course is on Canada and the United States. Topics to be covered in the course include: the political economy of European colonialism and mercantilism on North America; the population history of the colonies; the staple hypothesis and forward and backward linkages of staple production and export; the Jeffersonian ideal, the family farm and the settlement of frontier lands; the impact of the frontier on the choice of technique and the “American system of manufactures”; the economics of slavery and the political economy of the Civil War in the United States; transportation and infrastructure development and the impact of the railroads; the demographic transition, immigration and human development; growth accounting and structural change; theories of innovation and technological change. My office hours are 11:30 am to 12:20 pm on Tuesdays and Fridays. My office is 378 Business and Economics Building, on the third floor. I will meet students outside of these hours but only by appointment (please see me at the end of lecture for an appointment.) Because I find to answer questions via e-mail, I discourage students from making enquiries or asking informational questions through e-mail. Moreover, I do not guarantee that I will respond to e- mail.
    [Show full text]
  • The 1758 Forbes Campaign and Its Influence on the Politics of the Province Of
    The 1758 Forbes Campaign and its Influence on the Politics of the Province of Pennsylvania Troy Youhas Independence National Historical Park Intern January-May 2007 Submitted to: James W. Mueller, Ph.D. Chief Historian Independence National Historical Park 143 S. 3rd. Street Philadelphia, PA 19106 Although it often gets overlooked, the French and Indian War, or the War for Empire as it is now becoming known, was a very important turning point in United States History. While it was only a small part of a much larger scale war between Great Britain and France, it would bring about many changes on the North American continent. The immediate results of the war included the British acquisition of Canada and an almost immediate end to French presence in the North American colonies. The war also had the long term effects of establishing British dominance in the colonies and planting the seeds for the American Revolution. In the grand scheme of the war, the state of Pennsylvania would prove to be immensely important. While the war was being intensely debated among the assemblymen in the State House in Philadelphia, many important military events were taking place across the state. Not only did the French and Indian War establish places like Fort Duquesne and Fort Necessity as key historical sites, but it also involved some notable men in Pennsylvania and American history, such as Edward Braddock, James Abercrombie, and a then little known 21 year old Colonel by the name of George Washington. The major turning point of the war, and American history for that matter, was led by a Scottish-born General by the name of John Forbes, whose expedition across the state in 1758 forced the French to retreat from Fort Duquesne, a feat unsuccessfully attempted by Braddock three years earlier, and ultimately set the British on a course towards victory.
    [Show full text]
  • Shell-Weiss on Browdy De Hernandez, 'Women Writing
    H-Florida Shell-Weiss on Browdy de Hernandez, 'Women Writing Resistance: Essays on Latin America and the Caribbean' and Lewis, 'The Culture of Gender and Sexuality in the Caribbean' Review published on Monday, August 1, 2005 Jennifer Browdy de Hernandez. Women Writing Resistance: Essays on Latin America and the Caribbean. Cambridge, Mass.: South End Press, 2003. xii + 241 pp. $18.00 (paper), ISBN 978-0-89608-708-8.Linden Lewis, ed. The Culture of Gender and Sexuality in the Caribbean. Gainesville: University Press of Florida, 2003. x + 328 pp. $59.95 (cloth), ISBN 978-0-8130-2677-0. Reviewed by Melanie R. Shell-Weiss (Department of History, Johns Hopkins University) Published on H-Florida (August, 2005) New Directions in Caribbean Gender and Sexuality Studies The relationship between women's studies and studies of gender and sexuality continue to be the subject of debate within many feminist intellectual circles. To some, expanding the field to include both sides of the gender coin seems a logical next step. For others, however, it raises a number of questions about whether or not the project of women's history is indeed complete. As Bryce Traister so provocatively asked, to what extent is the rise of masculinity studies merely "American Viagra"?[1] Do these new studies really uncover gendered narratives of power?[2] Or do these merely resituate heterosexual white men at the center of academic discourse? When viewed from the standpoint of the Caribbean, where the need to define and develop an indigenous reading of feminist discourse still remains very much in progress, such questions and debates become even more heated.
    [Show full text]
  • Protestants, Quakers, and the Narrative of Religious Persecution in England
    DISCOVERY: Georgia State Honors College Undergraduate Research Journal Volume 2 Article 1 2014 Protestants, Quakers, and the Narrative of Religious Persecution in England Shelby Lohr Georgia State University Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.gsu.edu/discovery Part of the History of Religion Commons Recommended Citation Lohr, Shelby (2014) "Protestants, Quakers, and the Narrative of Religious Persecution in England," DISCOVERY: Georgia State Honors College Undergraduate Research Journal: Vol. 2 , Article 1. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31922/disc2.1 Available at: https://scholarworks.gsu.edu/discovery/vol2/iss1/1 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by ScholarWorks @ Georgia State University. It has been accepted for inclusion in DISCOVERY: Georgia State Honors College Undergraduate Research Journal by an authorized editor of ScholarWorks @ Georgia State University. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Quakers, Protestants, and the Narrative of English Religious Persecution In early modern England, religious intolerance reigned supreme. There was a pervading hostility towards religious groups that were not associated with the Church of England, and these dissenting religious groups were regularly persecuted for their differing views. While each sectarian group was unique, there are parallels that can be traced between the persecutions that occurred throughout this period. Among these 16 th - and 17 th -century dissenting groups are Protestants and Quakers, whose responses to persecution are strikingly similar. This essay seeks to trace the commonalities between these two religious groups, with the aim of gaining a more nuanced understanding of religious intolerance in a period hostile to religious nonconformity. First, it is imperative to understand the distinction between Protestants and Quakers as employed in this essay.
    [Show full text]
  • War and Legitimacy: the Securement of Sovereignty in the Northwest Indian War
    i ABSTRACT WAR AND LEGITIMACY: THE SECUREMENT OF SOVEREIGNTY IN THE NORTHWEST INDIAN WAR During the post-revolution period, the newfound constitutional government of the United States faced a crisis of sovereignty and legitimacy. The Old Northwest region, encompassing what is now Ohio, Indiana and Illinois, was disputed between several groups. The U.S. government under George Washington claimed the region and sought to populate the land with white settlers, British officials in North America wished to reestablish British hegemony in the Ohio River valley and Native-Americans wished to protect their ancestral homeland from foreign invasion. In the 1790s, war broke out between a British backed alliance of Native tribes and the United States of America. Historians have named this conflict the Northwest Indian War. Examining government records, personal correspondences between Washington administration officials and military commanders, as well as recollections of soldiers, officials and civilians this thesis explores the geopolitical causes and ramifications of the Northwest Indian War. These sources demonstrate how the war was a reflection of a crisis which threatened the legitimacy to American sovereignty in the West. Furthermore, they also demonstrate how the use of a professional federal standing army was used by Washington’s government to secure American legitimacy. Michael Anthony Lipe August 2019 ii WAR AND LEGITIMACY: THE SECUREMENT OF SOVEREIGNTY IN THE NORTHWEST INDIAN WAR by Michael Anthony Lipe A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts in History in the College of Social Sciences California State University, Fresno August 2019 APPROVED For the Department of History: We, the undersigned, certify that the thesis of the following student meets the required standards of scholarship, format, and style of the university and the student's graduate degree program for the awarding of the master's degree.
    [Show full text]
  • Daniel P. Barr Source: the Pennsylvania Magazine of History and Biography , Jan., 2007, Vol
    Victory at Kittanning? Reevaluating the Impact of Armstrong's Raid on the Seven Years' War in Pennsylvania Author(s): Daniel P. Barr Source: The Pennsylvania Magazine of History and Biography , Jan., 2007, Vol. 131, No. 1 (Jan., 2007), pp. 5-32 Published by: University of Pennsylvania Press Stable URL: https://www.jstor.org/stable/20093915 REFERENCES Linked references are available on JSTOR for this article: https://www.jstor.org/stable/20093915?seq=1&cid=pdf- reference#references_tab_contents You may need to log in to JSTOR to access the linked references. JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected]. Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at https://about.jstor.org/terms University of Pennsylvania Press is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to The Pennsylvania Magazine of History and Biography This content downloaded from 64.9.56.53 on Sat, 19 Dec 2020 18:51:04 UTC All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms THE Pennsylvania OF HISTORYMagazine AND BIOGRAPHY Victory at Kittanning? Reevaluating the Impact of Armstrongs Raid on the Seven Years' War in Pennsylvania ON SEPTEMBER 8, 1756, Lieutenant Colonel John Armstrong led 307 men from the Second Battalion of the Pennsylvania Regiment in a daring raid against Kittanning, an important Delaware Indian village situated along the Allegheny River approximately forty miles upriver from the forks of the Ohio.
    [Show full text]
  • University of Oklahoma Libraries Western History Collections Map Collection #15: D. J
    University of Oklahoma Libraries Western History Collections Map Collection #15: D. J. Berthrong ___________________________________________________________________________ 1. A black on white topographical copy of New Mexico, Arizona, and the "four corners" area. Map measures 14" x 20". No date. Two copies. Drawer 8606 2. An 11" x 15" black on white copy showing the old Northwest. Includes parts of Michigan, Ohio, Illinois, and Indiana, labeled "Indian Country." Indian villages and population figures are shown. Ca. early 19th Century. Drawer 8606 3. "A New Map of the Western Parts of Virginia, Pennsylvania, Maryland, and North Carolina." Settlements, rivers, and some topographical features are shown. Map is black on white and measures 17" x 23". Dated 1778. Drawer 8606 4. Western Indiana and Eastern Illinois drainage map showing waterways. A 17" x 22" blue on white copy. No date. Drawer 8606 5. Indiana. A 20" x 27" colored map showing towns, cities, counties, rivers, and railroads. U. S. Dept. of the Interior, 1916. Drawer 8606 6. Central Oklahoma. Map is 15" x 22" black on white. Shows Cheyenne-Arapahoe lands at time of 1892 Run. Also shows Wichita and affiliated tribes at the time of the 1901 drawing. Drawer 8606 7. Map is missing and no information is available about the map contents. [Missing since ca. 1999; confirmed missing 7/19/2018]. 8. Upper Mississippi. An 11" x 18" French exploration map showing waterways, forts, portages, and camps. Contains geographical inaccuracies. Includes text (French). A negative photostat from the Library of Congress. Ca. late 17th or early 18th Century. Drawer 8606. 9. Part 1 of Atlas compiled by S.
    [Show full text]
  • River Raisin National Battlefield Park Lesson Plan Template
    River Raisin National Battlefield Park 3rd to 5th Grade Lesson Plans Unit Title: “It’s Not My Fault”: Engaging Point of View and Historical Perspective through Social Media – The War of 1812 Battles of the River Raisin Overview: This collection of four lessons engage students in learning about the War of 1812. Students will use point of view and historical perspective to make connections to American history and geography in the Old Northwest Territory. Students will learn about the War of 1812 and study personal stories of the Battles of the River Raisin. Students will read and analyze informational texts and explore maps as they organize information. A culminating project will include students making a fake social networking page where personalities from the Battles will interact with one another as the students apply their learning in fun and engaging ways. Topic or Era: War of 1812 and Battles of River Raisin, United States History Standard Era 3, 1754-1820 Curriculum Fit: Social Studies and English Language Arts Grade Level: 3rd to 5th Grade (can be used for lower graded gifted and talented students) Time Required: Four to Eight Class Periods (3 to 6 hours) Lessons: 1. “It’s Not My Fault”: Point of View and Historical Perspective 2. “It’s Not My Fault”: Battle Perspectives 3. “It’s Not My Fault”: Character Analysis and Jigsaw 4. “It’s Not My Fault”: Historical Conversations Using Social Media Lesson One “It’s Not My Fault!”: Point of View and Historical Perspective Overview: This lesson provides students with background information on point of view and perspective.
    [Show full text]
  • The Frontiers of American Grand Strategy: Settlers, Elites, and the Standing Army in America’S Indian Wars
    THE FRONTIERS OF AMERICAN GRAND STRATEGY: SETTLERS, ELITES, AND THE STANDING ARMY IN AMERICA’S INDIAN WARS A Dissertation submitted to the Faculty of the Graduate School of Arts and Sciences of Georgetown University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Government By Andrew Alden Szarejko, M.A. Washington, D.C. August 11, 2020 Copyright 2020 by Andrew Alden Szarejko All Rights Reserved ii THE FRONTIERS OF AMERICAN GRAND STRATEGY: SETTLERS, ELITES, AND THE STANDING ARMY IN AMERICA’S INDIAN WARS Andrew Alden Szarejko, M.A. Thesis Advisor: Andrew O. Bennett, Ph.D. ABSTRACT Much work on U.S. grand strategy focuses on the twentieth and twenty-first centuries. If the United States did have a grand strategy before that, IR scholars often pay little attention to it, and when they do, they rarely agree on how best to characterize it. I show that federal political elites generally wanted to expand the territorial reach of the United States and its relative power, but they sought to expand while avoiding war with European powers and Native nations alike. I focus on U.S. wars with Native nations to show how domestic conditions created a disjuncture between the principles and practice of this grand strategy. Indeed, in many of America’s so- called Indian Wars, U.S. settlers were the ones to initiate conflict, and they eventually brought federal officials into wars that the elites would have preferred to avoid. I develop an explanation for settler success and failure in doing so. I focus on the ways that settlers’ two faits accomplis— the act of settling on disputed territory without authorization and the act of initiating violent conflict with Native nations—affected federal decision-making by putting pressure on speculators and local elites to lobby federal officials for military intervention, by causing federal officials to fear that settlers would create their own states or ally with foreign powers, and by eroding the credibility of U.S.
    [Show full text]