CITY OF LOS ANGEI.J':S INTER-PI;PARTMENTAh QORR~SPQN[)IONQE

DtAte: April 22, 2009

To: Honorable Members of the City Council

From: L.A. for Kids Steering Committee

Raymond P. Ciranna, Interim City Administrative Officer (JL- Gerry F. Miller, Chief Legislative Analys~ ;,l Jimmy Blackman, Deputy Chief of Stat( Office of the Mayor fiv

Subject: 2009-10 PROPOSITION K ASSESSMENT

SUMMARY

The L.A. for Kids Steering Committee presents for Council and Mayor consideration, the 2009-10 Proposition K Assessment Report that includes the recommended 2009-10 program expenditure plan and funding earmarks for Fiscal Years 2010-11 thorough 2013-14. Funding · · recommendations for reprogramming ~;:urre,pt year project allocations, award of 2008-09 maintenance funds and availapjlity, ,c)f program i(lfl.atkirl 01nd interest monies are also presented.

The Proposition K: L.A. for Kids Program was established in November 5, 1996, by passage of a Ballot Measure apprpved by City voters. The measure established an assessment district coterminous with City boundaries, in which the City collects up to $25 million annually in local assessments over aperiod of 30 years. To levy the 2009-10 assessment, Council must take the following actions prior to June 30, 2009:

1. Adopt a Resolution to Initiate Proceedings; 2. Approve an expenditure plan for fiscal year 2009-1 0; 3. Adopt a City Engineer's report describing the proposed improvements for the fiscal year; 4. Adopt a Resolution and Ordinance of Intention to levy the assessment; 5. Hold a public hearing; 6. Approve the environmental documents for the projects being considered for inclusion in the assessment; and 7. Adopt an ordinance confirming the assessment for the fiscal year.

In September 2008, Council took the first action for levying the 2009-10 assessment by adopting the Resolution to Initiate Proceedings (C.F. 08-2139). To complete the annual assessment process, this report recommends that Council proceed with actions two through four and initiate actions five through seven, as listed above.

The proposed 2009-10 expenditure plan, presented in Section 3 of the report Findings, totals $25 million, with a breakdown, as follows: Capital projects ($14.9 million); Administration ($749,000), Maintenance ($2.6 million); Inflation ($3.6 million); and, Debt Service on bonded projects ($3 million). The 2009-10 funding recommendations are further detailed in the Five Year Plan (Attachment 1) and the A List of projects recommended for funding in 2009-10 (Attachment 2). Projects earmarked for funding in fiscal years 2010-11 through 20013-14, form the B List of Projects (Attachment 3) and serve as alternates that may be substituted for A List projects that will not be implemented during the course of the program year.

Actions recommended for 2008-09 assessment funds are presented in Section 4 of the report Findings. These recommendations include the reprogramming of current year project allocations (Attachment 12) that are prompted by considerations presented in the report Findings. The recommended 2008-09 maintenance award of $3.39 million (Attachment 8), includes $2.37 million in current year funds and $1.02 million in unspent maintenance awards remaining from prior years. The availability of current year interest and inflation funds are also presented. The proposed use of inflation and interest funds will be provided through an amending Motion prior to the public hearing for the 2009-10 Assessment report that is recommended to occur on June 3, 2009.

RECOMMENDATIONS

That the City Council:

1. Adopt the attached City Engineer's report for the 2009-10 Proposition K Assessment (Attachment 9).

2. Adopt the attached Resolution of Intention to levy an assessment authorized by Proposition K, pursuant to the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972 (Attachment 10).

3. Adopt the Ordinance of Intention to levy an assessment authorized by Proposition K, pursuant to the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972 (Attachment 11).

4. Approve the 2008-09 Proposition K Maintenance awards totaling $3.39 million, which includes $2.37 million in 2008-09 assessment funds and the reprogramming of $1.02 million in surplus maintenance funds remaining from prior allocations of 2004-05 and 2005- 06 assessment monies (Attachment 8).

5. Approve reprogramming of 2008-09 project allocations as reflected in report Attachment 12, and authorize the City Engineer to execute or amend grant agreements with competitive grant applications, as needed to effectuate the 2008-09 reprogramming actions.

6: Authorize the Controller to adjust accounts to reflect the 2008-09 reprogramming of project allocations in the following funds pursuant to instructions to be provided by the City Administrative Officer: Proposition K Projects Fund No. 43K, Proposition K Maintenance Fund No. 43L and Proposition K Administration Fund No. 43M.

7. Instruct the City Clerk to publish notice by May 22, 2009 of a public hearing to take place on June 3, 2009, at 10:00 A.M. during the regular Council meeting.

8. Instruct the City Clerk to set an agenda item for public hearing on the Council agenda for June 3, 2009 to include the following actions:

2009·1 0 Proposition K Assessment Report Page 2 ol12 a. With respect to the projects in List 1 of Attachment 7:

1) FIND THAT each of these projects is STATUTORILY OR CATEGORICALLY exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act under the particular State and City CEQA Guidelines.

2) DIRECT the Department of Recreation and Parks and/or the Bureau of Engineering to prepare Notice(s) of Exemption or Notice(s) of Determination reflecting Council's actions and file such notices with the City and County Clerks within five working days of the City Council's final action confirming the 2009-10 Assessment and Engineer's Report. b. With respect to the projects in List 2 of Attachment 7:

FIND THAT these projects are exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act under State CEQA Guidelines section 15262 and Article II, section 2.d of the City CEQA Guidelines because the City Council's action is not subject to CEQA. The City Council's action is not an approval of a project which may cause a physical change in the environment, but instead is in the nature of a feasibility and planning study for a project which is not being approved at this time. c. With respect to the projects in List 3 of Attachment 7:

ACKNOWLEDGE that the City Council's action is exempt from CEQA under Article II, section 2.i, because the underlying project has already been evaluated and processed in accordance with the City CEQA Guidelines. d. With respect to the projects in List 4 of Attachment 7:

1) Review and Consider the Negative Declaration/Mitigated Negative Declaration;

2) Certify that the Negative Declaration/Mitigated Negative Declaration has been prepared in accordance with CEQA, and adopt it;

3) Adopt all the mitigation measures described in the Mitigated Negative Declaration as part of the City Council's approval of the Proposition K assessment and ADOPT the mitigation monitoring program prepared to ensure that the mitigation measures will be implemented;

4) Find that with imposition of the mitigation measures, there will remain no significant impacts; and

5) Instruct the Department of Recreation and Parks and the Bureau of Engineering to prepare a Notice of Determination and file with the City and County Clerks within five working days of the City Council's approval.

2009-10 Proposition K Assessment Report Page 3 of 12 e. With respect to the projects in List 5 of Attachment 7:

Find that those are projects that may be considered for funding after CEQA compliance. No further action is required at this time.

f. Adopt the ordinance prepared and transmitted by the City Attorney, confirming the assessments and approving the assessment diagram for Fiscal Year 2009-10.

g. Instruct the City Engineer to record a Notice of Assessment with the County Recorder.

h. Instruct the Controller to set up accounts for the 2009-10 Proposition K assessment in the following funds pursuant to instructions to be provided by the City Administrative Officer: Proposition K Projects Fund No. 43K, Proposition K Maintenance Fund No. 43L, and Proposition K Administration Fund No. 43M.

i. Approve the 2009-10 Five Year Plan for the L.A. for Kids Program and related schedules, as set forth in Attachments 1, 2, 3 and 6.

j. Instruct the Information Technology Agency to prepare and transmit the necessary computer tape or compact disk, as appropriate, to the County containing the assessment levy information confirmed by the City Council for fiscal year 2009-10 for each parcel in the Assessment District.

k. Authorize the City Engineer to negotiate and execute Proposition K grant contracts with competitive grant applicants in the Five Year Plan for 2009-10, excluding projects from the Department of Recreation and Parks and Bureau of Street Lighting, subject to approval of the City Attorney.

FISCAL IMPACT STATEMENT

Adoption of an Ordinance and Resolution of Intention to levy the Proposition K: L.A. for Kids Assessment for fiscal year 2009-1 0 indicates the Council's intention to levy assessments totaling $25 million to acquire and construct park and recreational facilities. The assessment can only be used for capital improvements, acquisition of land, administration, and maintenance. The cost of operating Proposition K projects as they are completed in future years will be funded by the annual operating budget adopted for City departments and with independent funding for projects operated by external entities. As reported by the Department of Recreation and Parks (RAP), the annual impact on the General Fund, once all projects recommended for funding in 2009-10 become operational, totals $4.69 million and includes $2.92 million for maintenance and $1.77 million for operations. The General Fund impact can potentially be reduced by maintenance funding awarded to RAP projects in future years (Attachments 4 and 5). The proposed 2008-09 maintenance award for RAP projects totals $2.5 million, due in part to the availability of one-time funding.

Prior to Council acting on the 2009-10 Proposition K funding recommendations, the L.A. for Kids Steering Committee will review a final construction budget estimate for the A list of projects proposed for funding in the upcoming year. The final 2009-10 A List of projects will have sufficient funding identified to complete construction and meet all Proposition K program obligations without having an impact on the General Fund.

2009-10 Proposition K Assessment Report Page 4 of 12 FINDINGS

1. Basis for Report

On September 23, 2008, Council adopted a Resolution to Initiate Proceedings that directed the Public Works Bureau of Engineering (BOE) and the Office of the City Administrative Officer (CAO) to report on the 2009-10 capital program proposed for Year 13 of the Proposition K Program (C.F. 08-2139). This Assessment Report transmits the 2009-10 Proposition K funding recommendations along with proposed adjustments to 2008-09 funding allocations.

2. Proposition K Program Overview:

The Proposition K Program, currently in its twelfth year of a 30-year program, was established by the adoption of a 1996 Ballot Measure approved by city voters. The L.A. for Kids Steering Committee was created by City ordinance in the subsequent year as the program's administrating entity. Committee membership consists of representatives from the Offices of the Mayor, the City Legislative Officer and the CAO, with the latter serving as the chair. Council transferred project management to BOE in April 2002 (C. F. 01-0600-S51) and administration of the program's competitive awards process in December 2003 (C.F. 03-0515-S2). The Board of Public Works, Office of Accounting (PW Accounting) provides program accounting services.

Funding deliberations begin each year with the convening of three Regional Volunteer Neighborhood Oversight Committees (RVNOC) for the Central, Southern and Valley planning areas. Two RVNOC members are appointed by each of the fifteen Council Offices to represent district funding priorities. At the conclusion of the RVNOC deliberations, five-year expenditure plans for each region are presented to the Steering Committee for further deliberation, including consideration of staff input. While RVNOC recommendations are limited to funding for the upcoming five-year cycle, staff recommendations also include proposed changes to the current year expenditure plan.

The Steering Committee transmits initial funding recommendations through an annual Assessment Report that now coincides with the release of the Mayor's Proposed Budget. Prior to the public hearing scheduled each June, any proposed changes to the initial funding recommendations are transmitted to Council through an amending Motion. Program funding recommendations must conform to use restrictions established by the 1996 Ballot Measure, which are summarized in the remainder of this section.

Approval of the expenditure plan for fiscal year 2009-10 includes adoption of a Resolution and Ordinance of Intention that formally indicates the City's intention to levy Program assessment funds (Attachments 10 and 11 ). The Engineer's Report, provided in draft form as report Attachment 9, will be finalized by BOE to reflect the approved 2009-10 expenditure plan and the associated cost-benefit methodology used to allocate the assessment levy to parcels throughout the city. The allocation of assessment levies is also filed with the County in an electronic format prepared by the Information Technology Agency (ITA).

2009-10 Proposition K Assessment Report Page5of12 a. Project Categories: Specified and Competitive

Proposition K funds two types of projects: 1) those that were specified in the Ballot Measure; and, 2) those awarded through a competitive process open to City entities, other governmental agencies and non-profit agencies. A total of 183 projects were specified in the Measure for a specific project scope and individual funding awards that total $298.85 million. To date, full or partial funding has been allocated to 143 of the specified projects. In addition, 187 projects have received aggregate funding of $101.25 million through six competitive funding cycles that are conducted every two years. Competitive and Specified projects are further divided into local and regional categories. b. Proposition K Funding Restrictions

The Proposition K Ballot Measure specifies expenditure ratios that the City must achieve over the 30-year life of the program for capital expenses (82%), maintenance (15%) and administration (3%). Capital funds can be used to finance debt service on bonded projects. State law prohibits the use of Proposition K funds for program operations.

Program administration funds are allocated, on a first priority basis, to fund the estimated fee charged by the County for collecting assessment monies. The remaining administration funds are allocated to BOE and PW Accounting to partially offset Proposition K staffing costs. Allocations are then adjusted, on a current year basis, to reflect the final fee billed by the County through the amending Motion heard in June.

Maintenance funds are awarded on a current year basis through a competitive process administered by the CAO. Eligibility is limited to projects completed by December 31 51 of the awarding year. Since program monies do not fund operations and only partially offset annual maintenance expenses, external agencies must demonstrate an ability to maintain and operate the completed project prior to the start of development.

The annual program budget includes debt service for three bond series issued by the City between 2000 and 2002. The use of bond funds has increased program capacity, which would otherwise be limited to the $25 million annual funding limit. To date, a total of 16 projects with overall costs of $56.8 million, were net financed with $52.7 million in bond funds and a match requirement of $4.1 million (Attachment 1, page 17). c. Program Accounting Funds

During the first four program years, revenues were initially deposited into and disbursed from the Parks Assessment Fund No. 698. In an effort to better track and report program expenditures, a separate fund was created for each of the three expenditure categories. Program revenues are now received first into the Parks Assessment Fund and are then deposited into one of the three program funds, as follows:

2009-10 Proposition KAssessment Report Page 6 of 12 Revenues 43K- 82% $615 million Capital expenses.

43L- 15% $112.5 million Maintenance expenses.

43M- Administration 3% $22.5 million Administrative expenses.

Total: $750 million

The City is not restricted to the noted expenditure ratios on an annual basis, provided they are achieved by program completion. The Maintenance and Administration Funds currently include allocations for capital projects. As the program progresses and projects specified in the Ballot Measure are completed, annual funding for capital expenses will decrease relative to funding for maintenance and administration.

3. 2009-10 Proposed Five Year Expenditure Plan

The 2009-1 0 Five Year Plan (Attachment 1) includes the proposed Year 13 expenditure program that is also referred to as the A List (Attachment 2), along with funding earmarks for Years 14 through 17 that comprise the B List (Attachment 3). The funding recommendations presented for Council and Mayor approval are summarized below and detailed in the noted report Attachments:

·.··., ·... . .· ··. ·. ' 2009-10 Fiye Year Plan Funding Recommendations. I ': . · .. '· 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 Funding Category Year13 Year14 Year15 Year16 Year17 Competitive $5,838,527 $7,543,196 $6,167,842 $6,352,877 $6,543,463 Specified 9,061,107 13,170,134 14,524,950 13,339 733 9,173,600 ITA Set-Aside 50 000 50 000 50 000 50 000 50 000 (all regions) Subtotal li14 949,634 $20 Z63,330 $20 Z42 Z92 $19,Z42 610 $15,Z6Z,063 Administration $ 748,964 $ 754,896 $ 760,874 $ 766,899 $ 772,972 Maintenance 2,567,711 2,779,507 3,008,773 3,256,949 3,525,597 Inflation 3,644,707 3,754,048 3,866,669 3,982,669 4,102,149 Debt Service 3,088,984 3,056,049 3,049,064 3,052,184 3,055,339 Grand Totals $25,000 000 $31,10Z 830 $31,428,H2 $30,801,311 $2Z 223120

The City is only required to balance the program budget to the $25 million annual funding limit for the 2008-09 and 2009-10 program years. The budget for Years 14 through 17 will be balanced through future year funding deliberations. During the 2009-10 program year, delayed A List projects may be substituted for any of the B List projects. These reprogramming actions ensure that the required $25 million annual funding commitment is maintained.

2009-10 Proposition K Assessment Report Page 7 of 12 a. Current and Upcoming Competitive Award

The sixth and current competitive award cycle provides funding of $11.46 million for 24 projects programmed over the 2008-09 and 2009-10 program years. The sixth cycle funding awards were approved through the adoption of the 2008-09 Assessment Report (C.F. 07-4171). The chart below reflects the distribution of sixth cycle funding, inclusive of proposed reprogramming actions presented in Section 4 of this report:

.. .. · Distribution of Sixth Cycle Competitive ~ •• c.; u~ .·. . . · .. Total •. ~,~~•"' 2008-09 2009-10 Total Sixth Cycle Region Awarded (Year 12) (Year 13) Funding Award Central 8 $2,319,410 $1,500,000 $3,819,410 Southern 8 1,809,166 2,010,244 3,819,410 Valley 8 1,991,128 1,828,283 3819411 Totals 24 $6.119.704 $5.338.527 $11.458.231

"'""rlh & Fifth Cycle >o* $1,750,000 $ 500,000 W//,j~ Five Year Plan Totals ,'/;7.869. 704 $5.838.527 ~~

* Due to reprogramming actions in prior years, allocations for projects awarded under the Fourth and Fifth Cycle Competitive RFP are included as part of the total Competitive funding level presented in Section 4 and Attachment 1 of this report for Years 12 and 13.

On March 26, 2009, the L.A. for Kids Steering Committee approved the release of the Seventh Cycle Request for Proposals (RFP), which will be transmitted under separate cover for Council and Mayor authorization. The Seventh Cycle funding availability totals $13.14 million and includes $12.16 million in Proposition K competitive funds, with the balance of $984,000 provided by Parks First Trust Fund monies that are restricted to the acquisition and development of recreational projects in a specific area of the City. Seventh cycle funding will be spread across Years 14 and 15 for the period July 1, 2010 through June 30, 2012. b. 2009-10 Funding Deliberations

The RVNOCs conducted the 2009-10 funding deliberations over a five week period, meeting a total of 11 times between October 15, 2008 and November 12, 2008. Each of the three RVNOC planning areas were provided a spending limit of $3.01 million for both regional and local specified projects recommended for funding in Program Year 13. The final RVNOC funding recommendations includes an unallocated balance of $815,431, with a breakdown as follows:

RVNOC ' > Year 13 Specified Project Recommendations.. ··.·.· vi'13UnaiiOi:ate'CI < Region.__ .,.· Spending Limit Regional Local Totals ... ·Funds '.·.·. Central $3,011,951 $100,000 $2,869,750 $2,969,750 $ 42,201 Southern 3,011,951 230,000 1,920,671 2,150,671 861,280 Valley 3,011,950 2,950,000 150,000 3,100,000 (88,050) Grand Totals $9,035,!352 $3,2!!0,000 ~.9~0.~2:1 $!3,220,~2:1 $!3:15,43:1 2009-1 0 Proposition K Assessment Report Page 8 of 12 On January 29, 2009, the L.A. for Kids Steering Committee received and considered the RVNOC recommendations and directed BOE to provide recommendations for the unallocated funding balance rematmng from the RVNOC deliberations. On February 26, 2009 and March 26, 2009, BOE presented funding recommendations that were adopted by the Steering Committee and resulted in changes to the RVNOC funding recommendations, as follows:

r .· ..... I BOEr ... . ; ... 1t() Year I 3iJ ~••~ I """""'II"'"' •. "~ RVNOC BOE Funding Categories Variance D. D dations Specified Projects $8,220,421 $9,061,107 $840,686

C ompetT I tve rn. I VJ_t::vl;>·'· 5,913,782 5,838,527 (75,255) ITA Set-Aside - 50,000 50,000 Subtotals: $14.134.203 $14.~1'\:l.d $815.431 Administration 748,964 748,964 - Maintenance 2,567,711 2,567,711 - Inflation 3,644,707 3,644,707 - Debt Service 3,088,984 3,088,984 - Total Recommendations: $24.184.569. $25.000.000 $815.431 Unallocated Balance $ 815,431 - ~ Annual Funding Limit: $25,000,00Q $25,000,000 ~ ~I c. Projection of General Fund Impact for 2009-10 A List Projects

Since a majority of Proposition K projects are operated by the Department of Recreation and Parks (RAP), an estimate of the impact on the General Fund for additional staffing and maintenance costs was prepared by the department (Attachment 4 and 5). Once all the 2009-10 A List projects become operational, RAP estimates the increased annual cost of operations as $1.77 million and $2.92 million for maintenance, for a total annual cost of $4.69 million.

Although Proposition K monies cannot be used to fund operations, program funds can be used to offset maintenance expenses incurred by City departments. As presented in Section 4 of this report, RAP is recommended to receive $2.5 million in current year maintenance funding. d. Recommended Allocation of Administration Funding

The recommended distribution of $748,964 in 2009-10 administration funds reflects an obligatory increase in the County's collection fee. Since administration funds are increased at a rate of less than one percent each year, the significant County fee increase results in an overall five percent funding reduction for City staffing expenses, as summarized below and presented with additional details in report Attachment 6:

2009-10 Proposition K Assessment Report Page 9 of 12 . ' .;.:, K . . . ' ,' . . All; c< .c .. . .. ' ~u"""'~"a"'" 'VH~ ' , ·. ' ...... •. ·_·····.······_.· ·._.•...... · .. ' " , . Recipient Approved 2008-09 Proposed 2009-10 Percentage Change r.r,ntv A $1 !i!i 000 $192' ()()() 24% Bureau of Engineering 444,000 420,507 (5%) PW Accounting 144 080 136 457 (5%) Totals: $74~ nRn $74R QR4 < 1%

Due to the limited amount of Proposition K funds available for overall program administration, it is recommended that other departments, including the Office of the City Administrative Officer, Office of the Chief Legislative Analyst, Cultural Affairs Department, and Department of Recreation and Parks continue to absorb program costs within budgeted funds as done in prior years.

e. 2009-10 Maintenance, Inflation and Debt Service

The proposed 2009-10 maintenance ($2.57 million) and inflation ($3.64 million) allocations will be awarded to individual projects during the course of the 2009-10 program year. The individual project awards will be presented for Mayor and Council approval in April2010, as part of the 2010-11 Assessment Report. The proposed 2009-10 debt service allocation of $3.09 million will be used to fund debt service on bonded projects.

4. 2008-09 Proposed Adjustments for Allocated Funds

To avoid forfeiture of uncommitted funds, the City must adopt a $25 million expenditure program prior to the start of each program year. As each year progresses, adjustments to project allocations through reprogramming actions are necessary to ensure that the full funding commitment is maintained. Other current year funding actions include the award of maintenance, inflation and interest monies. This section presents recommendations for both current year reprogramming and maintenance awards. Although there are no recommendations at this time for award of inflation and interest monies, an overview of prevailing circumstances and funding availability is provided.

a. Current year Reprogramming

Reprogramming actions are taken each year to address changes in project status, funding availability and site conditions, and thereby maintain the Program's full funding commitment level of $25 million annually. On March 26, 2009, the L.A. for Kids Steering Committee adopted 2008-09 reprogramming recommendations that adjust project allocations in response to: 1) Inaccessibility of supplemental project funding due to suspension of state bond payments; 2) Delayed land acquisitions; 3) Unforeseen circumstances requiring remediation of project site contamination; 4) Projects progressing ahead of schedule; and, 5) Funding realignments to reflect current project schedules. The 2008-09 recommended reprogramming actions are part of the Year 12 project allocations included in the 2009-10 Five Year Plan (Attachment 1). Projects impacted by the proposed reprogramming actions adopted by the L.A. for Kids Steering Committee on March 26, 2009, are identified in report Attachment 12.

2009-10 Proposition K Assessment Report Page 10 of 12 b. Maintenance Awards

The 2008-09 Proposition K expenditure plan adopted by Council in June 2008 (C.F. 07-4171), set aside $2.37 million in maintenance funding that is now being recommended for award to individual projects. Due to the availability of unspent, prior­ year maintenance funding, the 2008-09 project maintenance awards are recommended for funding of $3.39 million, which includes $2.37 million in current year funding and $1.02 million in prior-year monies. A total of 107 applications were submitted for funding through the 2008-09 application process with a breakdown, as follows:

I< <,\ .. ,··· .•.•··•·········· .• ·... · ". 2008;~9)>rop()sMMaintenaiu':e'Awards ,·.•······· ·...... · ..·•.· .. ) .! / • ...... ··.··· •• ·· Los Angeles Dept. of Non-profit Zoo Grand Applicants: Unified School Cultural RAP Agencies Dept. Total District Affairs Recommended $612,152 $171,307 $73,345 $2,504,791 $29,385 $3,390,980 Award: Number of 25 13 3 65 1 107 applications

The Steering Committee authorized the release of the 2008-09 Maintenance Application on January 30, 2009, with a response deadline of March 5, 2009. A total of $2.93 million in maintenance funds were recommended for 87 applications submitted by the March deadline. In response to an appeal presented at its March 26, 2009 meeting, the Steering Committee extended the application deadline to April 8, 2009. Under the extended deadline, 20 new and 6 revised applications were submitted for additional funding of $458,125 and a revised aggregate request of $3.39 million.

Due to the inability to fully invoice for maintenance expenses incurred in prior years, a combined savings of $1.2 million in maintenance monies previously allocated for RAP projects is available for reprogramming as a one-time funding source. The use of this $1.2 million in maintenance savings and this year's allocation of $2.37 million is sufficient to fund all 107 applicants. The City Attorney has advised that these prior year maintenance funds may be used to offset the difference between the 2008-09 funding availability and the requested funding. Further, the prior year maintenance funds are not counted as part of the $25 million current year funding limit since the allocations were made from 2004-05 and 2005-06 assessments.

Maintenance funding is awarded on a current year basis, but paid on a reimbursement basis during the subsequent program year. The proposed maintenance awards include a total of $2.61 million for project maintenance by City departments. These funds are programmed in the 2009-10 Proposed Budget. c. Allocation of Program Inflation and Accumulated Interest Monies

A portion of the $25 million annual budget, which is increased by three percent each year, is set-aside to fund increased construction costs that are attributable to inflation over the course of the 30 year program. The 2008-09 expenditure plan adopted by Council in June 2008 (C.F. 07-4171), included an allocation of $3.5 million for inflation monies available for award to individual projects during the current year.

2009~ 10 Proposition K Assessment Report Page11of12 To mitigate the State's temporary suspension of Proposition 40 bond funds awarded to the specified Proposition K project at the Fred Roberts Recreation Center, $938,088 in 2008-09 inflation funds was awarded to the project by Council action in March 2009 (C.F. 09-0444). This action reduces the 2008-09 interest set-aside to $2.6 million.

Projects are eligible to receive a maximum inflation allowance of three percent each program year starting from Year Two of the program through the year that the construction contract is awarded. The inflation award is further limited to the amount of funding shortfall determined at the time of bid and award. At this time, the overall construction shortfall for 2008-09 projects has not yet been determined as the bid and award for several projects is still in process. Recommendations for inflation awards will be provided as part of an amending Motion that will be transmitted to Council prior to the end of the current fiscal year and after construction bids are received and funding shortfalls are determined.

In years that available inflation funds exceed project shortfalls, the excess inflation funds are allocated to debt service to avoid funding loss of uncommitted funds. If the current year inflation funds are insufficient to fully offset eligible project funding shortfalls, program interest can potentially offset the difference.

The Proposition K program generates revenue in the form of interest earnings and collection penalties. Program revenue is first used to offset assessments in years that collections fall short of the $25 million annual funding level due to taxpayer delinquencies. The remaining revenues, commonly termed "interest" funds, are awarded to projects based on an objective inflation factor that exceeds the three percent rate used to award inflation funds, such as the Consumer Price Index.

Excess interest funds awarded to projects are distributed on the following priority basis: 1. Non-bonded specified projects that have a need and have not yet received the full three percent inflation allocation of inflation pool funds; 2. Non-bonded specified projects that have a need and have received the three percent allocation but may receive additional inflation funds based on an objective index; and, 3. Bond-funded projects for the time prior to their receipt of debt service (inflation) funds.

RPC:BCH:05090048

Attachments: 1. 2009-10 Five Year Plan for Years 13-17 2. 2009-10 A List (Year 13) 3. 2009-10 B List (Years 14-17) 4. General Fund Impact- RAP Maintenance Costs 5. General Fund Impact- RAP Operational Costs 6. 2009-10 Recommended Administrative Funding Allocations 7. Categories of Environmental Documents for 2009-10 A List 8. 2008-09 Maintenance Funding Recommendations 9. City Engineer's Report for Fiscal Year 2009-10 10. Resolution of Intention 11. Ordinance of Intention 12. 2008-09 Reprogramming Recommendations

2009·1 0 Proposition K Assessment Report Page 12 of 12 PROPOSITION K: 2009·10 L.A. FOR KIDS PROGRAM Attachment 1 DRAFT FIVE YEAR PLAN FOR YEARS 13-17

.....,,...... ··-. .. " . ,_ ov-., PROPK I .COST OF TOTALPROPK YR 12 YR13 YR14 Year15 Year16 Year 17 CD PROJECT SCOPE FUNDS YRS IPROJECT TITLE '"' ALLOCATION 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 "'""' 1-11 ?REDEVELOPMENT ALL COSTS REASONABLY INCURRED TO CONDUCT ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES PRE~DEVELOPMENTFOR ALL PROJECTS ALL $646,678 1 AND APPRAISALS OF PROJECTS i IDENTIFIED ON THE A LIST AND BUST COMPETITIVE GRANTS COMPETITIVE GRANTS YET TO BE $0 $5,985,19 $6,Hl7,842 $6,352,877 $6,543,463 ALLOCATED {INCLUDES INFLATION) $0 24TH STREET THEATER \1st cycle 1 RENOVATE BUILDING $6,25 $26,450 $20,200 FRANCIS AVENUE COMMUNITY GARDEN (5th ACQUISITION AND MINOR 1 $450,000 $450,000 Cycle) IMPROVEMENTS . ' ' lAUSD: LINCOLN HIGH SCHOOL 2nd c cle 1 ATHLETIC FIELD LIGHTING $0 $165 000 $165,000 LAUSD: VISTA HERMOSA PARK 5th C cle 1 DEVELOPMENT OF SOCCER FIELD $ $515481 $515481 GREENING AND RENOVATION OF BASEBALUSOCCER/FOOTBALL FIELD & RENOVATION OF THE INDOOR & LOS ANGELES BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB (4th 1 OUTDOOR BASKETBALL COURTS, NEW $800,000 $400,000 cycle) OUTDOOR PICNIC AREA, NEW SEATING, FENCING AND BEAUTIFICATION LANDSCAPING PLAZA DE LA R.AZA 2nd c cle 1 RENOVATE EXISTING FACILITIES $ $250,000 $250 000 PLAZA DE LA R.AZA 5th qc!e 1 FACILITY LIGHTING $ $500 000 $500,000 CHILDREN'S WATER PLAY AREA JN POOL REC & PARKS: DOWNEY POOL (6th Cycle) 1 $500,000 $ $500..000 FACILITY ' REC & PARKS: DOWNEY RECREATION 1 ATHLETIC FIELD LIGHTING $125,000 $125,000 CENTER (2nd cvcl~\ ' REC & PARKS: ECHO PARK POOL (3rd & 4th UPGRADE EXISTING ECHO PARK .POOL 1 $ $3,296,400 .. $988,920 ocle\ AND BATHHOUSE CHILDREN'S WATER PlAY AREA IN POOL REC & PARKS: LINCOLN POOL {6th Cycle) 1 $500,000 $0 $500,000 FACILITY ' INSTALLATION OF 30" LIGHT STANDARDS REC & PARKS: MACARTHUR PARK (4th cycle) 1 $250,000 $250,00 IN AND AROUND MACARTHUR PARK REC & PARKS; MOUNT OLYMPUS 1 ACQUIRE LAND $12 $796,443 $796,318 ACQUISITION (1st cvcle) REC & PARKS: NORMANOIE RECREATION REFURBISHMENT AND EXPANSION OF 1 $310,000 $310,000 CENTER (5th Cycle) BASKETBALL COURTS SIZE ' CONSTRUCT 3 SOCCER FIELDS AND 1 REG & PARKS: TAYLOR YARDS (4th cycle) 1 BASEBALL FIELD, LIGHTING, PARKING $2,407,756 $1,203,878 Includes reprogrammed fonds of $203,676. AND ENTRANCE IMPROVEMENTS · CD1 TOTAL $10 892 530 $5 974797 $ $·1 000 00 $D $0 MID..VALLEY JEOPARDY FOUNDATION, INC. 2 UGHTS AND AIR CONDITIONING $43,130 $42,880 "' 1st cvc!e- formerlv CD 5) "' REC & PARKS: MID-VALLEY RENOVATE FACIUJY TO ADD YOUTH 2 $380,308 $38,031 INTERGENERATIONAL CENTER (2nd cycle) WING ' REC & PARKS: ORO VISTA ACQUISITION (3rd 2 ACQUIRE LAND FOR PARK $940,950 $940,950 lcvclel REC & PARKS: OROV!STAPARK 2 DEVELOPMENT OF A PASSIVE PARK $350,000 $0 $70,00 $280,0Q( DEVELOPMENT (6TH Cycle) REC & PARKS: VAN NUYS/ S~RMAN OAKS 2 CONSTRUCT CHILDREN'S WADING POOL $108,610 $108,610 PARK (2ndcy_yle- fonne_rlyCD 5 ' REC & PARKS: VERDUGO PEAK 4th c cle 2 ACQUIRE LAND FOR PARK $1 200,000 $600,000 REC & PARKS: VERDUGO MOUNTAIN PARK 2 LAND ACQUISITION $1,000,000 $1,000,000 (5th cvcle) ' REC & PARKS: VERDUGO AREA ACQUISITION 2 ACQUiSITION OF OPEN SPACE $1,000,000 $0 $1,000,00 6th Cycle) TREE PEOPLE 1st c cle- former! CO 5 2 BUILD AN ENVIRONMENTAL CENTER $25 $1 080.250 $1,080 000

2009-10 Assessrrn!!nt Report Prepared: April 22, 2009 Page 1 of 17 PROPOSITION K: 2009-10 L.A. FOR KIDS PROGRAM Attachment 1 DRAFT FIVE YEAR PLAN FOR YEARS 13-17

DRAFT FIVE YEAR PLA.N, YEARS 13*17 PROP K COST OF TOTAL PROP K YR12 YR13 YR14 Year15 Year 1-6 Year17 PROJECT TITLE CD PROJECT SCOPE '~ FUNDS YRS REVIEW ALLOCATION 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 1-11 . VALLEY VILLAGE SUNLAND ACTIVITY 2 FACILILTYRENOVATION AND EXPANSION $450,000 $450,000 CENTER (5th Cycle) ' ;VICTORY VINELAND CHILDCARE CENTER- 2 BUILD A CHILDCARE CENTER $2,100,000 $2,100,000 irLona Term Bond) ' CD 2 TOTAL $8 653,248 $6 360 471 $1 070,00 $Z80 000 $0 $0 $0 $< CATHOLIC CHARITIES 2nd de 3 ATHLETIC FIELD LIGHTING $0 $42,800 $42,800 ;CATHOLIC CHARITIES 2nd de 3 CONSTRUCTION OF SPORTS FACILITIES s $248,244 * $0 IEL CAMINO REAL HIGH BOOSTERS (1st cycle) 3 STADIUM LIGHTS '" $185,754 $185,504 I~USD:CLEVElAND SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL FIELD IMPROVEMENTS, FENCING, 3 $101,000 $10\,000 5th Cvcle) LANDSCAPING ' lAUSD: HALE MIDDLE SCHOOL (4th cycle) 3 GYMNASIUM IMPROVEMENTS $44,081 $44,081 RENOVATE EXISTING WEIGHT ROOM AND i LAUSD: RESEDA HIGH SCHOOL (1st cycle) 3 $25 $64,715 $64,465 OBSTACLE COURSE REG & PARKS: LANARK POOL WATER SLIDE 3 PURCHASE A WATER SLIDE $118,044 $117,919 1stcvcle) "' REG & PARKS: LANARK RECREATION REFURBISHMENT OF 4 BASEBALL FIELDS, 3 $887,139 $792,000 CENTER 14th cvclel IRRIGATION THERAPEUTIC LIVING CENTERS FOR THE 3 BUILD ENCLOSURE OVER POOL $371,650 $371,650 BLIND 12nd cvc!e) ' BUILD SPECIAL PLAYGROUND FOR THERAPEUTIC LIVING CENTERS FOR THE 3 PRESCHOOL AGE CHILDREN WITH $125,000 $0 $125,00 BLIND (6th Cycle) MULTIPLE DISABILITIES CO 3 TOTAL $2188 427 $1 719 419 $125 00 $0 $0 $ $0 $( LAUSD: MARSHALL SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL 4 ATHLETIC COMPLEX RENOVATIONS ' $200,000 $200,000 LAUSD: MARSHALL HS TRACK EXPANSION 4 TRACK EXPANSION $808,335 $0 $808,33 6th Cvclel REG & PARKS; CAHUENGA PEAK (5th 4 LAND ACQUISITION $755 000 $0 S755QO REG & PARKS: GRIFFITH PARK CAMP CABIN ' "' 4 RENOVATE EXISTING FACILITIES m $47,749 $47,624 IMPROVEMENTS (1st cycle} REG & PARKS: NORTH HOLLYWOOD 4 RENOVATE THREE BALL DIAMONDS $244,938 $244,938 RECREATION CENTER_(_2nd _9191e} ' REG &PARKS: NORTH HOLLYWOOD 4 LIGHT ONE BALL DIAMOND $85,000 $85,000 RECREATION CENTER !2nd cvcle-) ' ·REG & PARKS: NORTH HOLLYWOOD 4 SECURITY LIGHTING $40,000 $40,000 RECREATION CENTER (2nd cvclel ' YMCA EAST VAllEY FAMILY BRANCH (1st 4 BUILD ROLLER HOCKEY RINK AND LIGHTS $310,250 $310,00 cvcl~l· '" CD4TOTAL $2 491 272 $927 562 $808 33 $0 $755.00(} $0 $0 LAUSD: FAIRFAX HIGH SCHOOL nd c cle 5 ATHLETIC FIELD LIGHTING $384 000 $384,000 " REG & PARKS: SEPULVEDA BASIN " 5 CONSTRUCT NEW RESTROOM FACilll)' $550,000 $550,000 COMMUNITY GARDENS(pth Qy_cle} ' REPLACE EXISTING VENTILATION REG & PARKS: WESTVVOOD RECREATION 5 SYSTEM FOR POOL AND/OR RECREATION $414,333 $0 $414,33 CENTER (6th Cycle) CENTER CO 5 TOTAL $798 333 $934 000 $414 33 $0 $0 $0 $0 ., REG & PARKS: BRANFORD REG CENTER (1st 6 DEVELOP BASEBALL FIELD $115,133 $115,008 cycle • former1y CO 2) "' jREC & PARKS: BRANFORD REC CENTER (1st 6 LIGHTING $105,000 $105,000 ;cycle· former1y CD 2) INSTALL FOUNDATION FOR NEW 1REC & PARKS: DELANO RECREATION 6 GYMNASIUM AND ENVIRONMENTAL $450,692 • $0 CENTER (2nd cycle- former1y CD 11) M!T!GAT!ON ' REG & PARKS: DELANO RECREATION CONSTRUCT A NEW RECREATJON 6 $614,424- $0 CENTER (3rd Cycle) CENTER AT DELANO PARK INSTALL NEW SYNTHETIC SOCCER FIELD :REC & PARKS: DElANO PARK (6th Cycle) 6 ON EXISTING TURF FJELD, MODIFY $1,000,000 $ $200,00 $800,00 IRRIC::ATinN

2009-10 Assessment Report Prepared: April 22, 2009 Page 2 of 17 PROPOSITION K: 2009-10 L.A. FOR KIDS PROGRAM Attachment 1 DRAFT FIVE YEAR PLAN FOR YEARS 13-17

DRAFT FIVE YEAR PLAN, YEARS 13~11 PROPK COST OF TOTAL PROP K YR12 YR 13 YR14 Year 15 Year 16 Year 17 PROJECT TITLE CD PROJECT SCOPE ALLOCATION FUNDSYRS REVlEW 2008-09 2009-10 2010·11 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 '"" 1-11 CONSTRUCTION OF 3 SOCCER FIELDS (2 WITH LIGHTS), 2 BASEBALL FIELDS REC & PARKS: SHELDON ARLETA (4th cycle) 6 SECURITY LIGHTING PARKING $803,878 $403,878 $400,000 Includes reprogrammed funds of $203,878. IRRIGATION, DRINKING FOUNTAINS, FENCING ST. ELISABETH CHURC\"l ARCHOIOCE~~OF 6 REHABILITATE SPORTS FIELDS $25 $49,749 $49,499 LOS ANGELES (1st cycle- formerjy_CD 11 CD 6 TOTAL $3 138 876 $673 385 $200 00 $1 200 000 $0 so $0 $( BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF SAN FERNANDO 7 RENOVATE EXISTING FACiliTIES $644,200 $643,950 VALLEYI-1stc cl~~- '" LANLT: FOX & LAUREL CANYON PARK (6th ACQUISITION AND DEVELOPMENT OF 7 $485,12 $ $485, 12E Cvclel VACANT PROPERTY INTO PARK GREENING AND LANDSCAPING, REG & PARKS: BRAND PARK (5th Cycle) 7 $456,200 $456,200 IRRIGATION SYSTEM REG & PARKS: DAVID M. GONZALES BUILDING ENCLOSURE AND WEIGHT 7 $282,400 $282,400 RECREATION CENTER (5th Cvclel ROOM CONVERSION ' REC & PARKS: ELDORADO ACQUISITION (6th 7 ACQUISITION $500,000 so $500,000 Cvclel REC & PARKS: GONZALEZ/ PACOIMA 7 EXPAND BOXING FACILITY $587,391 $587,391 RECREATION CENTER (2nd cycle} ' REC & PARKS: HANSEN DAM 2nd c cle 7 PURCHASE AND INSTALL WATER SLIDE $244,391 $244,391 REC & PARKS: HUBERT HUMPHREY POOL ' 7 PURCHASE A WATER SLIDE $118,044 $117,919 1st cvclel "' REC & PARKS: SEPULVEDA PARK WEST (1st 7 ACQUISITION OF LAND $440,150 • $0 lcvclel ' REC & PARKS: SYLMAR REC CENTER (1st 7 LIGHTS $147,029 $146,904 lcvclel "' REG & PARKS: SYLMAR RECREATION 7 SPLASH PADS $608,037 $608,037 CENTER (4th cvclel CD 7TOTAL $4 512 970 $3 087192 $48512 $500 000 so $0 $0 $( ESPERANZA COMMUNITY HOUSING CORP. 8 BUILD A PARK· GREENING $211,049 $210,799 RICHARDSON FAMILY PARK (1st cycle) "' ESPERANZA COMMUNITY HOUSING CORP. BUILD A PARK- SPORTS FIELDS $ $42,693 $42,693 RICHARDSON FAMILY PARK-~,-st cvcle-1 . • LAUSD: CRENSHAW HIGH SCHOOL (4th cycle) 8 NEW TRACK IMPROVEMENTS $1,282,000 $641,000 RENOVATE EXISTING 5,400 SQ FT PEOPLE WHO CARE YOUTH CENTER- 8 BUILDING TO INCLUDE A MUSIC ROOM, $735,829 $735,829 PROJECT RENEW (3rd cycle) GAME ROOM, AND CHILD CARE ATHLETIC IMPROVEMENTS TO REC & PARKS: ALGIN SUTTON RECREATION 8 MULT!PURPOSE SPORTS FIELD, $242,838 $242.838 CENTER (2nd cycle) BLEACHERS ' REG & PARKS: ALGIN SUTTON RECREATION BU!LD NEW ATHLETIC FIELD RESTROOM 8 s $248,488 $248,488 CENTER /2nd c clel AND REFURBISH EXISTING RESTROOM REFURBISH EXISTING SWIMMING POOL REC & PARKS: EPlCC POOL (3rd cycle) 8 $250,000 ... $0 INTO A ZERO-DEPTH POOL. REC & PARKS: HARVARD PARK POOL (4th DEMOLITION AND REPlACEMENT OF 8 $1,000,000 $1,000,000 cvclel POOL AND BATHHOUSE REC & PARKS: HARVARD RECREATION 8 CONSTRUCT IN-GROUND SKATE PARK $546,000 $546,000 CENTER (5th cycle) REFURBISH TURF, REPLACE FENCING/BACK STOP FABR!C, INSTALL AWNINGS ON DUGOUTS, REPLACE REC & PARKS: HARVARD RECREATION 8 IRRIGATIONfELECTRICAL PANEL $712,000 $0 $150,00 $562,000 CENTER (6th Cycle) ENCLOSURE, REPLACE BLEACHERS & PADS, NEW WALKlNGfJOGGING PATH AROUND PERIMETER REC & PARKS: MARTIN LUTHER KING JR. 8 EXPAND EXISTING FACILITIES $1,201,62 $1,201,500 THERAPEUTIC FACILITY (1st cycle) ""

2009-10 Assessment Report Prepared: April22, 2009 Page 3 of 17 PROPOSITION K: 2009-10 L.A. FOR KIDS PROGRAM Attachment 1 DRAFT FIVE YEAR PLAN FOR YEARS 13-17

DRAFT FIVE YEAR PLAN, YEARS 13-17 PROPK COST OF TOTAL PROP K YR12 YR 13 YR14 Year 15 Year16 Year17 PROJECT TITLE CD PROJECT SCOPE FUNDS YRS REVIEW ALLOCATION 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 '"' 1-11

REG & PARKS: MOUNT CARMEL RECREATION RENOVATE ATHLETIC FIELDS, 8 $ $362,244 $362,244 CENTER (2nd cycle- formerly CD 9) BASKETBALL COURT, NEW RESTROOM

REG & PARKS: MOUNT CARMEL RECREATION 8 LIGHTING FOR BALL FIELD $190,691 $190,691 CENTER (2nd cycle· formerly CD 9) ' NEW CHILDREN'S PLAY AREA, GREENING REG & PARKS: MOUNT CARMEL RECREATION 8 OF PICNIC AREA, PARKING LOT LIGHTING, $ $190,029 $190,029 CENTER {2nd cycle- formerly CD 9) FENCING TESTIMONIAL COMMUNilY LOVE CENTER RENOVATION OF BUILDING FOR USE AS 8 $247,280 $247,280 2nd eve!~I. CHILDCARE FACILITY ' CDS TOTAL 7 462766 $5 859 391 $150 00 $562.000 $0 0 $0 $0 AFRICAN AMERICAN UNI1Y CENTER (1st 9 RENOVATE EXISTING BUILDING $338,274 $338,024 lcvclel '" ALL PEOPLE'S CHRISTIAN CENTER (1st cycle) 9 RENOVATE EXISTING FACILITIES $25 $254,464 $254,214 ART SHARE LOS ANGELES 2nd c cle 9 RENOVATE DANCE STUDIO $250,000 $250 000 COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY ' (CRA) CALIFORNIA PLAZA (3rd cycle; funds 9 AWNINGS $ $0 $0 reprogrammed to Variety Boys and Girls- 6th lcvclei COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OUTDOOR IMPROVEMENTS AND (CRA) VENICE HOPE RECREATION CENTER 9 $591,000 $591,000 LIGHTING 5th cyle) ' CONCERNED CITIZENS OF SOUTH CENTRAL CONSTRUCT 53,000 SQ FT SOCCER FIELD 9 $ $760,054 $760,054 LOS ANGELES (3rd cycle) WITH SYNTHETIC PLAYING SURFACE GAGE AVALON PARK (5th Cycle 9 PARK DEVELOPMENT $ $217,000 $217,000 HOUSING AUTHORITY: AVALON GARDENS CONSTRUCTION OF ART STUDIO FOR 9 $245,500 $245,500 2nd cvcle - formerlv CD 8) YOUTH ' INSTALLATION OF SYNTHETIC TURF LAUSD: FREEMONT HIGH SCHOOL (6th Cycle) 9 $500.000 $0 $500,00 SPORTS FIELD l TSC COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 9 LITTLE TOKYO RECREATION CENTER $250,000 $0 $250,000 CORPORATION (6th Cvcle\ PCS YOUTH AND FAMILY RECREATION PEOPLE COORDINATED SERVICES (6th Cycle) 9 $700,330 $0 $700,33 CENTER REG & PARKS: PROPERTY AT FIGUEROA AND URBAN GREENING OF DWP PROPERTY 9 $134,696 • $0 SLAUSON {2nd cycle) AT FIGUEROA AND SLAUSON ' REFURBISHMENT OF TWO EXISTING REG & PARKS: ROSS SNYDER REG CENTER 9 BASEBALL FIELDS, NEW IRRIGATION, AND $ $551,151 $551,151 (4th cycle) PERIMETER FENCING REG & PARKS: SOUTH L.A. WETLANDS (5th ACQUISITION FOR DEVELOPMENT OF A 9 $ $1,000,000 $ $1,000,00 cycle) WETLANDS LANDSCAPING AND TREE PLANTING, · REC & PARKS: VERMONT SQUARE (2nd cycle) 9 $203,204 $203,204 IRRIGATION PICNIC AREA ' BASKETBALL COURT, RESTROOM REC & PARKS: VERMONT SQUARE (2nd cycle) 9 s $212,305 $212,305 IMPROVEMENTS CD 9 TOTAL $6 207 978 3 622 452 $2 200.33 $250 000 0 $0 $0 c REMODEL OF INDOOR AND OUTDOOR SPACE TO PROVIDE YOUTH WITH CARECEN (4th cycle) 10 $500,000 $250,000 SUPERVISED SAFE AND ACCESSIBLE RECREATION GRAMERCY HOUSING GROUP {3rd cycle) 10 EXPANSION OF CHILDCARE FACILITY $185,000 $185,000 LAUSD LA CENTER FOR ENRICHED STUDIES ' 10 BUILD A NEW FACILITY $856,611 $856,361 LACES) {1st cvcle) RANCHO ClENEGA CH!LDCARE CENTER- "' 10 BUILD A CHILDCARE CENTER $2,100,000 $2,100,000 Lonq Term Bond) ' REC & PARKS: BENNY POTTER PARK (6th GREENING, IRRIGATION. PICNIC AREA, 10 $655,000 $0 $107,75 $547,244 Cycle} PATH WITH OUTDOOR FITNESS STATIONS

2009-10 Assessment Report Prepared: April 22, 2009 Page 4 of 17 PROPOSITION K: 2009-10 L.A. FOR KIDS PROGRAM Attachment 1 DRAFT FIVE YEAR PLAN FOR YEARS 13-17

-· ' ' ... _' ... .., '_...,,~ ...... -,. PROPK I COST OF TOTAL PROP K YR12 YR13 YR14 Year 15 Year 16 Year 17 ' PROJECT TITLE CD PROJECT SCOPE FUNDSYRS REVIEW ALLOCATION 2008-09 2009·10 2010-11 2011-12 2012·13 2013·14 "" 1-11 I REG & PARKS: CELES KING Ill POOL (2nd UPGRADE POOL FACILITY, INCLUDING 10 $192,508 $192,508 cvclel ADA COMPLIANCE • J REG & PARKS: QUEEN ANNE RECREATION 10 ACQUISITION OF LAND TO EXPAND PARK $713,000 ~ $520,492 CENTER (2nd cvclel ' REC & PARKS: QUEEN ANNE RECREATION 10 DEMOLITION AND URBAN GREENING $200,025 • $0 CENTER (2nd cvclel • I REG & PARKS: RANCHO CIENEGA SPORTS 10 REFURBISH GYM $295,227 $295,102 CENTER REFURBISHMENT (1st cvc\e) REC AND PARKS: SOUTH SEAS HOUSE (3rd RENOVATION OF THE SOUTH SEAS "" 10 $661,000 ~* $0 cycle) HOUSE REG & PARKS WASHINGTON IRVING POCKET 10 GREENING OF POCKET PARK $76,220 $76,220 PARK (2nd cvctel • ! THE JEFFREY FOUNDATION 2nd cycle 10 UPGRADE RECREATIONAL FACILITY $180,000 $180.000 RENOVATION AND EXPANSION OF • THE JEFFREY FOUNDATION (5th cycle) 10 $246,000 $246,000 EXISTING FACILITY • C010TOT L $6 860 591 $4 901 683 $107 75 $547 2 $0 $0 0 0 MAR VISTA FAMILY CENTER- AKA THE MARVISTA INSTITUTE (2nd cycle- formerly 11 CONSTRUCTION OF YOUTH CENTER $250,000 $154,775 CD6l • RENOVATE EXISTING CLASSROOM AND MAR VISTA INSTITUTE- ART CENTER (3rd 11 COMPUTER ROOM TO FUNCTION AS AN $83,669 $83,669 cycle- formerly Co 6) ART CENTER ' MAR VISTA INSTITUTE- CHILD CARE CENTER 11 RENOVATE CHILD CARE CENTER so $99,584 * $99,584 3rd cvcle -former! CD 61 • MAR VISTA INSTITUTE AT-RISK YOUTH 11 EXPANSION OF YOUTH CENTER $500,000 $500,000 CENTER (3rd cvcle- CD 61 • REC & PARKS: MAR VISTA RECREATION 11 CONSTRUCT ROLLER HOCKEY RINK $247,837 $247,840 CENTER (2nd cycle) ' ROADWAY AND SIDEWALK LIGHTING REC & PARKS: STONER PARK LIGHTING (5th 11 ADJACENT TO STONER RECREATION $100,000 $100,000 Cycle) ' CENTER PARK • REC & PARKS: TEMESCAL CANYON PARK (5th REFURBISHMENT OF EXISTING PICNIC 11 $250,000 $250,000 Cvclei AREAS ' SOLAR SECURITY LIGHTING FOR REC & PARKS: VENICE BEACH (6th Cycle) 11 $73,000 $0 $73,00 GRAFFITI WALL . SANTA MONICA MOUNTAINS- Competitive 11 ACQUISITION OF MANDEVILLE CANYON $3,000,000 $3,000.000 Lonq Term Bond\ • TEMESCAL GATEWAY PARK (1st cycle) 11 RENOVATE EXISTING FACILITIES $1,000,318 $1 ,000,068 VENICE COMMUNITY HOUSING "' 11 RENOVATE CHILDCARE FACILITY $175,620 $175,370 CORPORATION (1st cycle- formerly CD 6) WESTCHESTER MARINA DEL REV YOUTH "' 11 LIGHTING FOR FIELDS $296,000 $296,000 FOUNDATION {3rd cycle- formerly CD 6) • WESTSIDE CHILDREN'S CENTER (1st cycle- 11 BUILD CHILD CARE FACILITY S25 $900,250 $900,000 formerly CD 6) CD 11 TOTAL $6 976 278 $6 807 306 $73 00 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 INSTALL MOVEABLE FLOOR POOL FOR CSUN POOL FOR THE DISABLED (3rd cyde) 12 $250,000 $250,000 DISABLED YOUTH. • LAUSD BIRMINGHAM HIGH SCHOOL {1st cycle 12 LIGHTS $110,731 $110,481 formerlv CD 3) '" LAUSD: PATRICK HENRY MIDDLE SCHOOL 12 CONSTRUCT FITNESS CENTER $211,270 $211,270 2nd cvclel • REC & PARKS: ALISO CANYON 4th c cle 12 ACQUIRE LAND FOR NEW PARK $1,100 000 $550,000 REPLACE INFIELDS, LEVEURESEED REC & PARKS: CHATSWORTH PARK NORTH OUTFIELD, REPLACE IRRIGATION 12 $248,283 $0 $248,283 (6th Cycle) SYSTEM, REPLACE FENCE FABRIC, NEW BLEACHERS, DRINKING FOUNTAINS REG & PARKS: CHATSWORTH PARK SOUTH 12 NEW GYMNASIUM FLOOR $111,000 $0 $111,000 6th Cvcle\ I

2009-10 Assessment Report Prepared: April 22, 2009 Page 5 of 17 PROPOSITION K: 2009-10 L.A. FOR KIDS PROGRAM Attachment 1 DRAFT FIVE YEAR PLAN FOR YEARS 13-17

DRAFT FIVE YEAR PLAN, YEARS 13-17 PROP K COST OF TOTAL PROP K YR12 YR 13 YR 14 Year15 Year 16 Year 17 PROJECT TITLE CD PROJECT SCOPE FUNDS YRS REVIEW ALLOCATION 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 '"' 1-11

REG & PARKS: MASON PARK 5th Cycle 12 OUTDOOR IMPROVEMENT, IRRIGATION $760,400 $260,400 $500,00 POOL HEATER, ADA REQUIRED • REC & PARKS: NORTHRIDGE POOL (2nd cycle) 12 $137,122 $0 UPGRADES • REC & PARKS: PEDLOW FIELD SKATEBOARD 12 BUILD SKATEBOARD PARK $7,82 $344,741 $336,916 PARK (1st cycle- formerly CD 3,6) REC & PARKS: PEDLOW SKATE PARK CONSTRUCTION OF A SKATE PARK (Phase 12 $1,000,000 $1,000,000 PHASE II) (3rd cvcle- formerly CD 3,6) II) YMCA NORTH VALLEY FAMILY BRANCH (1st 12 BUILD NEW GYM $960,000 $960,000 cvclel • CD 12 TOTAL $5 233 547 $3 679 067 $611 00 $248 283 $0 $0 $0 $( CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL LOS ANGELES CHILD 13 PLAYGROUND REMODELING $66,338 $66,338 DEVELOPMENT CENTER (3rd cycle) • CHILDREN'S INSTITUTE, INC. (6th Cycle; URBAN GREENING FOR TEMPLE STREET Includes $150,000 in reprogrammed funds from 13 $550,000 $150,000 $400,00C CAMPUS Hollvwood Beautification: C.F. 09-0468) HOLLYWOOD BEAUTIFICATION PLANTING OF 337 TREES AND TEAM/NEIGHBORHOOD GREENING (5th Cycle; 13 INSTALLATION OF THREE VINING $0 $0 funds reprogrammed to Children's Institute- 6th LOCATIONS • Cvcle) EL CENTRO DEL PUEBLO- Lon Term Bond 13 RENOVATE EXISTING FACILITIES $3,25 $943,240 $10,000 LAUSD WASHINGTON IRVING MIDDLE 13 CREATE PARK AND SPORTS FIELDS $1,374,700 $1,374,700 SCHOOL- CLona Term Bond) • INSTALLATION OF SYNTHETIC TURF LAUSD: BELMONT HIGH SCHOOL (6th Cycle) 13 $500,000 $0 $500,00 SPORTS FIELD LAUSD: DAYTON ELEMENTARY SCHOOL (4th PLAYGROUND WITH RESTROOM 13 $648,000 $324,000 Icycle) FACILITIES RENOVATION OF BUILDING INTO P.F. BRESEE FOUNDATION (2nd cycle) 13 $ $200,000 $200,000 ,,, COMMUNITY/ YOUTH CENTER REC & PARKS: JUNTOS PARK 2nd 13 PARK DEVELOPMENT • $448,537 * $331,988 REG & PARKS: LEXINGTON POCKET PARK 13 ACQUIRE LAND $25 $155,250 $155,000 1st cvclel REG & PARKS: LEXINGTON POCKET PARK 13 URBAN GREENING $231,028 $231,028 1st cvcle) ' REC & PARKS: TEMPLE-BEVERLY PARK (2nd 13 LAND ACQUISITION AT 227 N. LAKE ST $200,000 * $0 CYcle) • REC & PARKS: TEMPLE-BEVERLY PARK (2nd 13 LANDSCAPING, IRRIGATION $327,788 * $127,788 cycle} • REG & PARKS: TEMPLE-BEVERLY PARK (2nd 13 ATHLETIC FIELD LIGHTING $ $208,323 $208,323 ·cycle} REC & PARKS: TEMPLE-BEVERLY PARK (2nd 13 PRACTICE ATHLETIC FIELDS 5 $399,740 * $97,785 icyole) DEMOLITION OF BUILDING, BUILD REC & PARKS: TEMPLE-BEVERLY PARK (2nd 13 RECREATION CENTER WITH $729,575 * $36,890 cycle) MULTIPURPOSE ROOM AND RESTROOMS • REC & PARKS: YUCCA PARK 4th c cle 13 SYNTHETIC SOCCER F!ELD • $300,000 $300 000 SEARCH TO INVOLVE PlLIPJNO AMERICANS RENOVATION OF YOUTH AND 13 $ $250,000 $250,000 SIPA) (2nd cycle) COMMUNITY CENTER CD 13 TOTAL $7 532,519 $3 863 840 $900,00 $0 $0 $0 $0 ., BARRIO ACTION YOUTH & FAMILY CENTER 14 BUILD A YOUTH AND FAMILY CENTER $6,25 $1,103,762 $1,097,512 1stcvdel Fund reprogrammed: CAL STATE L.A.- ANNA BING ARNOLD RENOVATE CHILD CARE CENTER AND 14 $289,335 $65,457 to Sheldo CHILDREN'S CENTER (3rd cycle). PLAY YARD • Arleta: $203,878 t Taylor Yards. COD BOYLE HEIGHTS YOUTH OPPORTUNITY CONSTRUCTION OF RECREATION 14 $630,000 .... $0 ~:Cf.rlfITn::c {'01....1 ~·-·~'

2009-10 Assessment Report Prepared: April 22, 2009 Page 6 of 17 PROPOSITION K: 2009-10 L.A. FOR KIDS PROGRAM Attachment 1 DRAFT FIVE YEAR PLAN FOR YEARS 13-17

DRAFT FIVE YEAR PLAN YEARS 13·17 PROPK COST OF TOTAL PROP K YR12 YR13 YR 14 Year 15 Year 16 Year 17 PROJECT TITLE CD PROJECT SCOPE FUNDS YRS ""' ALLOCATION 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 """" 1-11 HOUSING AUTHORITY: PICO ALISO (2nd cycle) 14 RENOVATE GYM • $247,000 $247,000 RENOVATION OF 6TH STREET CHILDCARE PARA LOS NINOS (3rd cycle) 14 $500,000 $500,000 AND DEVELOPMENT CENTER • REG & PARKS: ASCOT PARK 2nd de 14 ACQUISITION OF LAND • $535,250 $10 000 REG & PARKS: ASCOT PARK (2nd cycle) 14 GREENING OF PARK • $124 486 $0 REG & PARKS: ASCOT HILLS PARK (5th Cycle) 14 PARK DEVELOPMENT • $250,000 $250,000 CHILDREN'S WATER PLAY AREA IN POOL REG & PARKS: COSTELLO POOL {6th Cycle) 14 $500,000 $0 $500,000 FACILITY REC & PARKS: PECAN RECREATION CENTER 14 RESTROOM,OUTDOOR IMPROVEMENTS $120,000 $120,00 (5th Cycle) • REG & PARKS: ROSE HILL PARK & RESTROOM IMPROVEMENTS, NEW 14 $211,789 $211,789 RECREATION CENTER 12nd cvcle) BASKETBALL COURT • SALESIAN BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF L.A. Fund 14 RENOVATE YOUTH CENTER $118,421 reprogrammed (3rd cycle) • Sheldon Arleta. SALESIAN HIGH SCHOOL {4th cycle) 14 SYNTHETIC SOCCER FIELD $1,300.000 $650 000 VARIETY BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB 4th c cle 14 RENOVATION OF AQUATIC FACILITIES $400 000 $400,000 VARIETY BOYS & GIRLS CLUB (6th Cycle; includes $180,000 in reprogrammed funds from 14 GYMNASIUM RENOVATION $196,742 $~80,000 $196,74 Community Redevelopmen Agency Awnings • 3rd cycle; C.F. 09-0469) WHITE MEMORIAL- RAINBOW CHILDREN'S RENOVATION OF RAINBOW CHILDREN'S 14 s $274,381 $274,381 CENTER {3rd cycle) CENTER CD 14 TOTAL $6 801166 $3 760 682 $196 74 $500 000 $0 $0 $0 $0 BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF SAN PEDRO· SATELLITE CLUBHOUSE AT THE PORT OF 15 $218,954 $218,954 SATELLITE CLUBHOUSE_Qrd ~le LOS ANGELES • COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY (CRA)-WATIS CULTURAL CRESCENT (3rd 15 CONSTRUCTION OF A CANOPY $ $250,000 $250,000 lcyclei DEVELOPMENT OF SOFTBALL. SOCCER REG & PARKS: EAST WILMINGTON 15 FIELD, PLAY AREA AND RELATED s $1,000,000 $0 $100,00 $100,000 $800,000 GREENBELT PARK (5tl1 cycle) AMENITIES. HARBOR CITYf HARBOR GATEWAY BOYS 15 RENOVATE EXISTING FACILITIES $373,746 $373,746 AND GIRLS CLUB (1st cvcle) ' LAUSD SAN PEDRO HIGH SCHOOL (1st cycle) 15 BUILD SPORTSf REC COMPLEX $1,25 $1.001,250 $1 ,000,000 REC & PARKS: 109TH STREET RECREATION 15 AQUATIC UPGRADES $651,000 $0 $651,000 CENTER (6th Cycle) REC & PARKS: FIELD OF DREAMS (2nd cycle) 15 BUILD A SOCCER COMPLEX ' $1,200,000 * $316,469 REC & PARKS: IMPERIAL COURTS (4th cycle) 15 FIELD REFURBISHMENT $383,531 $383,531 CONSTRUCTION OF A BASEBALL AND REC & PARKS: ROSECRANS RECREATION GIRLS' FAST PITCH SOFTBALL FIELD 15 $586,690 $436,690 $150,00 CENTER (4th cycle) INCLUDING LANDSCAPING, LIGHTING AND FENCING. WATTS LABOR COMMUNITY (4th cycle) 15 SKATE PARK $500,000 $250,000 CONSTRUCTION OF GU\SS BLOWING, WATTS LABOR COMMUNITY ACTION 15 SILK SCREENING AND CERAMICS $227,268 $227,268 COMMITTEE: MUDTOWN STUDIOS (2nd cycle) STUD OS ' INTERIOR AND EXTERIOR WILMINGTON BOYS & GIRLS CLUB (6!11 Cycle) 15 $278,08 $0 $278,08 IMPROVF=MENTS CO 15 TOTAL 6 67{1519 $3 456 658 $528 08 H51 000 800 000 0 $0 0 1,8, INNER-CITY ARTS (1st cycle) 9,10, FACILITY EXPANSION S2S $702,463 $702,213 14 LOS ANGELES CHILDREN'S MUSEUM- (1st CONDUCT ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW TO REG $100,00 $9,567,800 $100,000 Lcycle ·Long Term Bond) BUILD CHILDREN'S MUSEUM

2009·10 Assessment Report Prepared: Aprll22, 2009 Page 7 of 17 PROPOSITION K: 2009-10 L.A. FOR KIDS PROGRAM Attachment 1 DRAFT FIVE YEAR PLAN FOR YEARS 13-17

...,,..,..,, ...... ''-'"'"' "• ...... ,,...... -.. PROPK COST OF TOTALPROPK YR12 YR 13 YR14 Year 15 Year 16 Year 17 PROJECT TITLE CD PROJECT SCOPE FUNDSYRS REVIeW ALLOCATION 2008·09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012·13 2013·14 '" 1-11

LOS ANGELES CONSERVATION CORPS (2nd BUILD TWO RECREATIONAL GARDENS IN 2,7 $25 $47,859 $47,609 cycle) VALLEY

LOS ANGELES CONSERVATION CORPS (2nd ~3.PLANT 380 TREES THROUGHOUT THE 5,7, $ $125,000 $125,000 cycle) VALLEY 11,12 I REG & PARKS: VALLEY ATHLETIC FIELDS (1st 3,5, LIGHT AND ATHLETIC FIELD UPGRADES $738,208 $738,083 o:;:ycle) 12 EXPANSION AND REFURBISHMENT OF '" REG AND PARKS: ~~\BRILLOMARINE REG $462,897 $462,897 AQUARIUM 3rd cvcle CABRILLO MARINE AQUARIUM ' SANTA MONICA MOUNTAINS- 3rd cycle) REG ACQUISITION OF MANDEVILLE CANYON $3,000,000 $3,000,000 . REGIONAL TOTAL $14 644,227 $5 175 802 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 COMPETITIVE GRANTS TOTAL $101,065,247 $60,803,707 $7,869,70 $5,838,527 $7,543,196 $6,167,842 $6,352,877 $6,543,463

REGIONAL PROJECTS IMPLEMENTATION OF MASTER PLAN ANGELS GATE PARK REG IMPROVEMENTS AND PERIMETER $11,27 $2,000,000 $0 $150,000 $450,000 $750,000 $638,725 FENCING BALBOA SPORTS COMPLEX R'G CONSTRUCT NEW AQUATIC FACILITY $32,00 $3,000,000 $0 $268,000 $500,000 REFURBISHMENT OF BUILDING AND BANNING MUSEUM (Inflation YR 9- $80,031} R'G GARDEN IMPROVEMENTS (YR 8: $2,080,031 $805,031 $100,00C $350,000 $300,000 $524,875 BUILDING REFURBISHMENTS) "' BOYLE HEIGHTS SPORTS CENTER REG CONSTRUCT GYMNASIUM $26,59 $2 500,000 $0 $100,000 $200,000

BOYLE HEIGHTS SPORTS CENTER (Inflation CREATE SOCCER STADIUM AND INClt.ID~ REG $1,957,160 $1,957,160 YR 10-$457160) ENHANCE LANDSCAPING ABOVE EXPAND AND ENHANCE EDUCATION WING TO INCLUDE MORE TEACHING See Long Term CABRILLO AQUARIUM Long Term Bond) R'G $20,00 $5,000,000 LABS, DISCOVERY LAB, COLLECTION Bond STORAGE & H20 SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS BIKEWAY ALONG CHANDLER-BURBANK CHANDLER-BURBANK BIKEWAY REG LINE FROM WHITEOAK AND OXNARD TO $1,000,000 $10,000 VANOWEN AND DESOTO "' CREATION OF NATIVE AMERICAN DEBS PARK (Inflation YR 5- $251,018) R'G ''TERRACED GARDENS, " MASTER PLAN $2,251,018 $2,250,893 PREPARATION & IMPLEMENTATION "' DRUM BARRACKS (Inflation YR 6- $47,782) REG ACQUISITION OF LAND FOR PARKING LOT $2.00 $347,782 $57,782 $288,000 REMOVAL OF LEAD PAINT AND DRUM BARRACKS (Inflation YR 6 - $79,637} REG $16,27 $579,637 $563,362 REFURBISHMENT OF BUILDING ACQUISITION OF ADDITIONAL LAND, IMPROVEMENTS TO ATHLETIC FIELDS & ELYSIAN PARK R'G $12 $5,000,000 $923,823 $150,00C $100,000 $100,000 $100,000 $100,000 TRAILS, ROAD REFURBISHMENT, LIGHTING, RESTROOMS IMPROVEMENTS TO ATHLETIC FIELDS, FERRARO SOCCER FIELDS (Inflation YR 9 - REST ROOMS, POTABLE & RECLAIMED R'G $2,193,408 $1,568,408 $100,00 $100,00C $193,408) WATER, DEVELOPMENT OF PICNIC AREASWRS:RESTROOMSl "' IMPROVEMENTS TO ROADS, TRAILS, WATER SYSTEM, REST ROOMS, PICNIC GRIFFITH PARK R'G AREAS, PAVE LIVE STEAMERS PARKING $12 $5,000,000 $1,035.000 $100,000 $100,000 $100,000 LOT (YR 4: RESTROOMS FOR SHANE'S INSPIRATION) CONSTRUCT A PERFORMING ARTS GRIFFITH PARK PERFORMING ARTS CENTER REG s $3,000,000 $0 $100,000 CENTER FOR YOUTH CONSTRUCTION OF CHILDREN'S HANSEN DAM R'G $2,500,000 $2,625,796 ENVIRONMENTAL AWARENESS CENTER '

2009-10 Assessment Report Prepared: April 22, 2009 Page 8 of 17 PROPOSITION K: 2009-10 L.A. FOR KIDS PROGRAM Attachment 1 DRAFT FIVE YEAR PLAN FOR YEARS 13-17

... 1~1 I II~'- 11..1"\",-~"1 I~'~'"' IV"II PROPK COST OF TOTAL PROP K YR12 YR 13 YR14 Year15 Year16 Year 17 PROJECT TITLE CD PROJECT SCOPE FUNDSYRS REVIEW""' ALLOCATION 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011·12 2012-13 2013-14 1·11

SOCCER COMPLEX, RV PARK, RANGER STATIONNISlTOR'S CENTER, ROADfTRAIL HANSEN DAM REG IMPROVEMENTS, FENCING (YR 4&5: $246,05 $10,000,000 $2,231,630 $4,900,00 $50,000 $100,000 $218,370 $0 $ SOCCER COMPLEX, YR 7: ?REDEVELOPMENT FOR FUTURE SCOPE) WATER QUALITY AND FILTRATION KEN MALLOY HARBOR REGIONAL PARK-LAKE REG IMPROVEMENTS AT lAKE (YR 7: $199,87 $1,000,000 $400,125 $200,00 PREDEVELOPMENTl LAND ACQUISITION, GREENING ALONG AREA OF ENCINO, SHERMAN OAKS, LOS ANGELES RIVERFRONT PARK REG $101,06,; $10,000,000 $4,610,620 $50,00 $692,85 $1,352,504 $300,000 STUDIO CITY (YR 7: PREDEVELOPMENT, $1,000,001 YR 8: DESIGN, YRS 9-11: CONSTRUCTION)

MACARTHUR PARK REG CHILDREN'S PLAY AREA AND EQUIPMENT $12 $2,000,000 $1,999,875 REFURBISH BOATHOUSE, RECREATION BUILDING, SIGNAL BUILDING AND MACARTHUR PARK (lnflation-$167,466) REG $17,988 $2,167,466 $2,167,466 BANDSHELL, FENCING AND EDGE TREATMENT WATER QUALITY AND FILTRATION MACARTHUR PARK LAKE REG $12 $600,000 $0 $100,000 IMPROVEMENTS AT LAKE IMPLEMENTATION OF MASTER PLAN See long Term OBSERVATORY (Long Term Bond) REG $ $10,000,000 IMPROVEMENTS Bond REFURBISH BUILDING AND GROUNDS, ORCUTT RANCH (Inflation YR 9 - $533,540) REG ADA ACCESS IMPROVEMENTS (YR 7: $16,27 $2,533,540 $2,517,265 ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW\ BLOCK WALL REPAIR ON PERIMETER, RETAINING WALL, LIGHTHOUSE See Long Term POINT FERMIN PARK- (Long Term Bond) REG $2,000,000 IMPROVEMENTS AND IRRIGATION '" Bond UPGRADE STABILIZATION AND GRADING OF HILLSIDE AND CANYON, OUTDOOR PARK POTRERO CANYON REG $ $5,000,000 $5,000,000 DEVELOPMENT INCLUDING LANDSCAPING & IRRIGATION OF SUMMIT CONSTRUCTION AND REPAIR OF RIM-OF-THE-VALLEY TRAILS REG EQUESTRIAN/PEDESTRIAN TRAIL SYSTEM $200,00 $2,000,000 $200,000 $200,000 $400,000 $400,000 YR 7: PREDEVELOPMENT) ACQUISITION AND CONSTRUCTION OF S/E VALLEY ROLLER & SKATEBOARD RINK "G ROLLER AND SKATEBOARD RINK IN S!E $26,27 $4,000,000 $0 $200,000 $500,000 $3,273,725 SAN FERNANDO VALLEY PROPERTY ACQUISITION FOR OPEN SPACE AND REG. IN SANTA MONICA SANTA MONICA MOUNTAINS (DEERVALE) REG $17,80 $5,000,000 $4,500,000 MOUNTAINS BElWEEN LAUREL CANYON BLVD AND 405 FREEWAY BIKEPATH; PARKING; PICNIC AND RESTROOM FACILITIES; SOCCER FIELD SEPULVEDA BASIN REG $5,000,000 $1,412,045 $50,000 $1,950,000 $1,587,955 DEVELOPMENT (YR 7: ' PREDEVELOPMENTJ NEW ATHLETIC FIELDS, UGHTING, SEPULVEDA BASIN- HJELTE FIELD REG S32,00 $1,000,000 $100,000 $100,00C $350,000 $209,000 $209,000 PARKING UPGRADE IRRIGATION SYSTEM TO SEPULVEDA BASIN - LAKE BALBOA REG $2,000,000 $0 $99,875 $200,000 WATER CONSERVATION STANDARDS SEPULVEDA GARDEN CENTER (Inflation YR 6 "' REG CONSTRUCT MODERN FACILITY $1,159,274 $1,159,149 $159,274) SLAUSON/COMPTON PARK REG PARK DEVELOPMENT '"$ $1,500,000 $1,500,000 SOUTH CENTRAL SPORTS ACTIVITY CENTER ACQUISITION OF BUILDING & See long Term REG $22.92 $2,750,000 Lono Term Bond) DEVELOPMENT Bond BEAUTIFICATION OF RAIL ROAD RIGHT OF SOUTHERN PACIFIC TRAILS REG WAY FROM LA RIVER TO COLISEUM, $2,500,000 $0 $250,000 $150,000 $1,000,000 LANDSCAPING, TRAILS, IRRIGATION "'

2009-10 Assessment Report Prepared: April 22, 2009 Page 9 of 17 PROPOSITION K: 2009-10 L.A. FOR KIDS PROGRAM Attachment 1 DRAFT FIVE YEAR PLAN FOR YEARS 13-17

u...,..,,-,"""' '"'"'"'rL-M", '~"'"''"'"''

COST OF PROPK TOTAL PROP K YR 12 YR13 YR14 Year 15 Year 16 Year 17 1 PROJECT TITLE CD PROJECT SCOPE ALLOCATION FUNDSYRS REVIEW 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 "" 1-11 I

CONSTRUCT AND DEVELOP CHILDREN'S See Long Term ZOO {See Long Term Bond for Balance) REG $13,97 $11,000,000 I DISCOVERY AREA Bond

REGIONAL PROJECTS TOTAL $121,619,316 $39,595,430 $5,650,00 $3,742,857 $4,567,33 $3,752,245 $2,376,725 $5,773,72$ LOCAL PROJECTS PROPERTY ACQUISITION FOR PARK ALPINE RECREATION CENTER 1 $1,000,000 $0 : EXPANSION "' BOXING GYMNASIUM (Inflation CONSTRUCTION OF NEW BOXING GYM 1 $7,351 $2,609,546 $2,602,190 YR 10 ~$609,54§.1_ I(YR 8: PREDEVELOPMENJ) CONSTRUCTION OF CHILDCARE CENTER DOWNEY RECREATION CENTER (Inflation 1 TO ENHANCE RECREATIONAL $1,203,432 $1,203,307 YR 2 ~$28,500, Inflation YR 9 ~$224,932) OPPORTUNITIES FOR CHILDREN '" • RESTORATION OF HISTORIC FOUNTAIN FORT MOORE PARK 1 THROUGH ACQUISITION OR JOINT~USE $500,000 $0 AGREEMENT WITH LAUSO "' REFURBISH, RETROFIT AND CONVERT LINCOLN HEIGHTS JR ARTS CENTER (Inflation 1 CITY BUILDING INTO A JR. ARTS CENTER s $1,304,773 $1,304,773 YR 10 ~$304,773) YR 8: PREDEVELOPMEIH) REHABILITATE CITY BUILDING TO SERVE LINCOLN HEIGHTS YOUTH CENTER {Inflation 1 AS YOUTH CENTER (YR 8: $7,35 $1,304,773 $1,297,417 YR 10 ~$304, 773) PREDEVELOPMENn· OUTDOOR REFURBISHMENT INCLUDING ATHLETIC AND PICNIC FACILITIES, LINCOLN PARK 1 ROADWAYS, RESTROOMS, EROSION $2,000,000 $982,500 $100,20 $508,750 $408,55 $0 CONTROL, IRRIGATION (YR 8: ATHLETIC • AND PICNIC FACILITIES, ROADWAYS) WATER QUALITY AND FILTRATION See Short Term LINCOLN PARK LAKE (Short Term Bonding} 1 $600,000 IMPROVEMENTS AT LAKE "' Boo NORTHEAST R~LLERHOCKEY RINK (Inflation ACQUIRE & CONSTRUCT NEW ROLLER 1 $125,00 $3,859,791 $3,734,791 YR11~$859791 HOCKEY RINK CD 1 TOTAL $14 382 315 $11 124 978 $100,20 $508 750 $408,550 $0 $0 $0 UTILE LANDERS/BOLTON HALL {Inflation REFURBISH GROUNDS AND ACCESS 2 $1,229,874 $1,229,374 YR 8 ~$229 874\ PATHS, CONSTRUCT NEW RESTROOM '" STONEHURST RECREATION CENTER 2 FACILITY UPGRADES $500 000 $0 $50.000 $449 875 CONSTRUCT MODERN GYM, COMMUNITY '" STUDIO CITY 2 S12 $3,000,000 $30,000 $150,000 $350,000 CENTER LANDSCAPE AND IRRIGATION IMPROVEMENTS TO ATHLETIC FIELDS; SUNLAND RECREATION CENTER (Inflation 2 NEW FIELD RESTROOMS, PARKING $2,898,185 $2,898,060 YR6-$398,185) IMPROVEMENTS "' VAN NUYS SHERMAN OAKS PARK (Inflation CONSTRUCT MODERN RECREATION 2 $2,318,548 $2,318,423 YR 6- $318,548) BUILDING "' NEW SOCCER FIELDS. REFURBISH VAN NUYS SHERMAN OAKS PARK 2 BASEBALL FIELDS, LANDSCAPING $2,000,000 $199,875 $1,800,00 IMPROVEMENTS, IRRIGATION SYSTEM "'

WOODBRIDGE PARK (Inflation YR 8 ~$45,975) 2 FACILITY ENHANCEMENTS $500 $245,975 $245,475 C02 TOTAL $12192 582 $6 921 207 $1 800 00 $0 $0 $200 000 $799 875 $0 REFURBISH, RETROFIT AND CONVERT CANOGA PARK JR. ARTS CENTER 3 $ $1,800,000 $1,185,000 CITY BUILDING INTO A JR. ARTS CENTER OUTDOOR REFURBISHMENT, CASTLE PEAK PARK 3 $200,000 $0 RESTROOMS "' KNAPP RANCH (Inflation YR 6 ~$31,855) 3 SPORTS FIELD LIGHTING IMPROVEMENTS $231,855 $231,730 OUTDOOR REFURBISHMENT, '" LAZY J PARK 3 $125 $200,000 $0 RESTROOMS WATER QUALITY AND FILTRATION RESEDA PARK LAKE (lrrflation YR 6 -$95,564) 3 $695,56 $695,439 IMPROVEMENTS AT LAKE "' RESEDA RECREATION CENTER (Inflation YR 7 3 POOL BUILDING IMPROVEMENTS $1,058,625 $1,058,500 $58 625) "' •

2009~10Assessment Report Prepared: April 22, 2009 Page10of17 PROPOSITION K: 2009-10 L.A. FOR KIDS PROGRAM Attachment 1 DRAFT FIVE YEAR PLAN FOR YEARS 13-17

...,,.,....,- 1 1 ,,.,_ 1 "''"'" r L.l"\n, • '-"''~""'""' • PROPK COST OF TOTAL PROP K YR12 YR13 YR 14 Year 15 Year 16 Year 17 PROJECT TITLE CD PROJECT SCOPE FUNDSYRS '"' ALLOCATION 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 """' 1-11 ACQUISITION AND CONSTRUCTION OF RESEDA SKATE FACILITY 3 ICE HOCKEY AND ROLLER BLADING S21,27 $4,000,000 $0 $200,000 $500,000 $1,278,725 $2,000,000 FACILITY SERRANIA PARK 3 CONSTRUCT PUBLIC RESTROOMS $12 $250,000 $0 $249,875 FACILITY RENOVATION, BALL FIELD See Short Term SHADOW RANCH (See Short Bonding) 3 $125 $1,500,000 ! IMPROVEMENTS, FENCING, IRRIGATION Bond CONSTRUCTION OF CHILDCARE CENTER TARZANA RECREATION CENTER 3 TO ENHANCE RECREATIONAL $950,000 $950,000 OPPORTUNITIES FOR CHILDREN ' PARKING LOT AND RESTROOM WESTHILLS PARK (Inflation YR 9- $66,693) 3 $ $566,693 $566,693 IMPROVEMENTS· PARK EXPANSION CD 3 TOTAL $11 452 737 $4 687 362 $ so $449 875 $500,000 $1,278 725 $2 000 000 CAMPO DE CAHUENGA (Inflation YR 10- 4 FACILITY ENHANCEMENTS $260,955 $260,830 $60 955) '" OUTDOOR DEVELOPMENT, PLAY DELONGPRE PARK (Inflation YR 10- $76, 193) 4 $326,193 $326,193 EQUIPMENT LIGHTING, FENCING ' IMPROVEMENTS TO ATHLETIC FIELDS, GRIFFITH RECREATION CENTER (Inflation 4 SWIMMING POOLS, OR RECREATION $12 $1,097,026 $947,026 $149,875 YR 7- $97,026} CENTER !YR 7: ATHLETIC FIELDS) SENIOR CITIZEN CENTER AND NORTH HOLLYWOOD MULTl-PURPOSE 4 MULTIPURPOSE INTER-GENERATIONAL $0 $2,060,000 $2,060,000 CENTER (Inflation YR 5 - $60,000} CENTER REFURBISHMENT OF PARKING LOT, NORTH HOLLYWOOD PARK (Inflation YR 6- 4 IRRIGATION, GYM FLOOR, POOL $1,159,27 $1,159,149 $159,274) UPGRADES RESTROOM "' DEVELOP ROLLER HOCKEY, NORTH HOLLYWOOD SKATE FACILITY 4 SKATEBOARD, BMX FACILITY, WITH $21,27 $1,000,000 $0 PARKING GYM & PERIMETER FENCING, IRRIGATION, SPORTS FIELD PAN PACIFIC PARK (Inflation YR 5- $237,356) 4 $9,40 $3,237,356 $3,227,951 IMPROVEMENTS, WALK AND JOG PATHS, CHILD PLAY AREA ROBERT BURNS PARK 4 FACILITY ENHANCEMENTS $125 $200,000 $0 $199,875 PROPERTY ACQUISITION FOR PARK RUNYON CANYON PARK 4 $7,80 $2,500,000 $0 $100,000 $100,000 $100,000 $2,092,200 EXPANSION SOUTH WEDDINGTON PARK (Inflation YR 8- 4 FACILITY ENHANCEMENTS $245,975 $245,475 $45.975) '" EROSION AND DRAINAGE WATTLES PARK 4 $125 $500,000 $0 $100,00 $399,875 IMPROVEMENTS IMPROVEMENTS TO ATHLETIC FIELDS, WEST WILSHIRE (Inflation YR 9- $114,711) 4 SWIMMING POOLS, OR RECREATION $30,00 $1,114,711 $814,711 $270,000 CENTER fYR 9: ATHLETIC FIELDS) CONSTRUCT YOUTH RECREATION YUCCA PARK (Inflation YR 4- $92,727) 4 $1,092,727 $1,092,727 CENTER ' CD 4 TOTAL $14 794 217 $10 134 062 $100 000 $969 750 $249 875 $100 000 $2,092 200 $( IMPROVEMENTS TO ATHLETIC FIELDS, CHEVIOT HILLS 5 SWIMMING POOLS, OR RECREATION $1,000,000 $999,875 CENTER '" PERIMETER FENCING, PARKING LOT CHEVIOT HILLS 5 $1,000,000 $999,875 IMPROVEMENTS, IRRIGATION '" ENCINO PARK 5 FACILITY ENHANCEMENTS LIGHTING $250.000 $249,875 CONSTRUCTION OF CHILDCARE CENTER PALMS RECREATION CENTER (Inflation YR 4- '" 5 TO ENHANCE RECREATIONAL $1,038,091 $1,126,057 $88,091) OPPORTUNITIES FOR CHILDREN '" ACQUIRE LAND FOR PARKING LOT, POINSETIIA RECREATION CENTER 5 BUILDING AND LANDSCAPE $2,000,000 $0 $150,000 $100,000 $100,000 $500,000 REFURBISHMENT "'

2009-10 Assessment Report Prepared: April 22, 2009 Page 11 of 17 PROPOSITION K: 2009-10 L.A. FOR KIDS PROGRAM Attachment 1 DRAFT FIVE YEAR PLAN FOR YEARS 13-17

DRAFT FIVE YEAR PLAN YEARS 13-17 PROPK COST OF TOTAL PROP K YR12 YR13 YR14 Year 15 Year16 Year 17 PROJECT TITLE CD PROJECT SCOPE FUNDS YRS REVIEW ALLOCATION 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 "" 1-11 CONSTRUCT MODERN GYMNASIUM, COMMUNITY CENTER, CHILD CARE ROBERTSON RECREAnON CENTER 5 $3,000,000 $299,875 $100,000 $300,000 CENTER, PERIMETER IMPROVEMENTS "' YR 5: DESIGN) CD 5 TOTAL $8 288 091 $3 675 557 $ $150 000 $200 000 $400,000 $500 000 $0 BLYTHE ST. RECREATION CENTER (Inflation ACQUISITION OF LAND FOR NEW 6 $19,39 $298,513 $279,123 YR7-$48513) RECREATION CENTER BLYTHE ST. RECREATION CENTER (Inflation INCI.LtDEO 6 CONSTRUCT RECREATION CENTER $2,609,546 $2,609,546 YR 10-$609 546) A60VEi OUTDOOR REFURBISHMENT: BALL BRANFORD RECREATION CENTER 6 DIAMONDS, PAVING, IRRIGATION, GYM $1,000,000 $0 $149,87.:: $150,00 $350,000 $350,000 FLOOR "' CONSTRUCTION OF CHILDCARE CENTER BRANFORD RECREATION CENTER (Inflation 6 TO ENHANCE RECREATIONAL $ $1,038,091 $1,038,091 YR4·$88,091) OPPORTUNITIES FOR CHILDREN OUTDOOR REFURBISHMENT: SEPULVEDA RECREATION CENTER IMPROVEMENTS TO ATHLETIC FIELDS, $49,875 6 "~ $500,000 $0 $450,000 SWIMMING POOL ACQUIRE, REFURBISH, RETROFIT AND SUN VALLEY JR. ARTS CENTER (Inflation YR 6 6 CONVERT BUILDING IN SUN VALLEY INTO $7,27 $2,025,003 $2,017,728 • $225,003) A JR. ARTS CENTER IMPROVEMENTS TO ATHLETIC FIELDS; SUN VALLEY REC CENTER 6 $ $500,000 $0 $500,000 NEW FIELD RESTROOMS SUN VALLEY RECREATION CENTER 6 BUILDING REFURBISHMENT $200 000 $0 $200,000 CD 6 TOTAL ' $8171153 $5 944 488 $149 87 $150,000 $899 875 $1 000 000 $0 $0 RENOVATE OUTDOOR AREAS, ANDREAS PICO ADOBE 7 $700,000 $0 $70,000 $314,937 $314,938 RESTROOMS. LIGHTING "' REFURBISHMENT OF MEMORY GARDENS BRAND PARK 7 $ $500,000 $500,000 AND RESTROOMS CONSTRUCTION OF CHILDCARE CENTER HUBERT HUMPHREY RECREATION CENTER $475 + 2 7 TO ENHANCE RECREATIONAL $2,459,748 $2,459,248 (Inflation YR 8- $459,748) forligh OPPORTUNITIES FOR CHILDREN ACQUIRE LAND AND CONSTRUCT NEW MID VALLEY MULTI-PURPOSE CENTER 7 SENIOR CENTER AND MULTIPURPOSE $2,525,961 $2,525,961 (Inflation YR 2- $25,961) INTERGENERATIONAL CENTER • RITCHIE VALENS RECREATION CENTER 7 SPORTS FIELD LIGHTING $307,468 $306,968 Inflation YR 8- $57 468) '" CONSTRUCTION OF CHILDCARE CENTER ROGER JESSUP RECREATION CENTER 7 TO ENHANCE RECREATIONAL $1,300,000 so $130,000 $500,000 $500,000 OPPORTUNITIES FOR CHILDREN '" SEPULVEDA PARK WEST (Inflation YR 4- ACQUISITION OF LAND FOR NEW 7 $1,231,818 $1,000,000 $231,818) RECREATION FACIUTIES ' SEPULVEDA PARK WEST (Inflation YR 5- CONSTRUCT NEW RECREATION 7 $7,24 $2,697,588 $2,922,166 $197,588) FACILITIES STETSON RANCH 7 LAND ACQUISITION, FACILITY EXPANSION $10,00 $1,000,000 $0 $200,000 CD 7TOTAL $12 722 583 $9 714 343 $ $0 $70 000 $444,937 $814 938 $700 000 CONSTRUCTION OF CH!LDCARE CENTER ALGIN SUTTON RECREA T!ON CENTER 8 TO ENHANCE RECREATIONAL $978,500 $978,375 (Inflation YR 2- $28,500) OPPORTUNITIES FOR CHILDREN "' ALGIN SUTTON RECREATION CENTER 8 CONSTRUCTION OF NEW POOL BUILDING $800,000 $0 $100,000 $400,000 $299,875 CHESTERFIELD SQUARE PARK (!nflation ARCHITECTURAL LANDSCAPING AND "' 8 $579,637 $579,512 YR 6- $79 637) BENCHES CONSTRUCT MODERN RECREATION '" DENKER PARK (Inflation YR 5- $313,772) 8 $2,813,722 $2.808,926 FACILITY "'

2009-10 Assessment Report Prepared: April 22, 2009 Page 12 of 17 PROPOSITION K: 2009-10 L.A. FOR KIDS PROGRAM Attachment 1 DRAFT FIVE YEAR PLAN FOR YEARS 13-17

1 UIV'\<1 nvo.;. '"'""'"'-''""'"• '""""""" ov~,

' PROPK COST OF TOTAl. PROP K YR 12 YR13 YR14 Year 15 Year 16 Year17 I PROJECT TITLE CD PROJECT SCOPE FUNDSYRS REVIEW ALLOCATION 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 "" 1-11 CONSTRUCTION OF CHILOCARE CENTER

~EXPOSITIONRECREATION CENTER (EPICC) TO ENHANCE RECREATIONAL $1,300,000 $1 ,300,000 ' OPPORTUNITIES FOR CHILDREN ' CONSTRUCTION OF CHILDCARE CENTER l;oRENMILLER RECREATION CENTER 8 TO ENHANCE RECREATIONAL $50 $1,598,836 $1,598,336 (Inflation YR 8 - $298,836) OPPORTUNITIES FOR CHILDREN IMANCHESTER JR. ARTS CENTER (Vision REFURBISH, RETROFIT AND CONVERT 8 S10,00 $1,800,000 $1,000,000 $50,000 $640,000 $100,000 Theatre) CITY BUILDING INTO A JR. ARTS CENTER NORMAN HOUSTON PARK 8 PARK DEVELOPMENT $200 000 $199,875 ST. ANDREWS RECREATION CENTER 8 OUTDOOR SPORTS DEVELOPMENT "' $500,000 $0 $250,000 $249.875 VAN NESS RECREATION CENTER (Inflation CONSTRUCT MODERN RECREATION "' 8 $2,388,105 $2,387,980 YR7-$388,105l BUILDING "' CONSTRUCTION OF CHILDCARE CENTER [VAN NESS RECREATION CENTER (Inflation- 8 TO ENHANCE RECREATIONAL $1,335,100 $1,335,100 $35,100) OPPORTUNITIES FOR CHILDREN ' IMPROVEMENTS TO ATHLETIC FIELDS, VAN NESS RECREATION CENTER (Inflation 8 SWIMMING POOLS, CHILDREN'S PlAY $1~ $1,100,00~ $750,00 $349,87 YR- 9 $40,016, Inflation YR 11 - $59,988) AREA IRRIGATION CD 8 TOTAL $15,393,904 $12 938 108 $399 87 $890 000 $449 675 $400,000 $299,875 $0 ACQUISITION OF PROPERTY FOR PARK CENTRAL RECREATION CENTER 9 $21.27 $1,000,000 $0 $978,725 EXPANSION BUILDING REFURBISHMENT AND PARK CENTRAL RECREATION CENTER 9 INC\.UOW $1,000,000 $0 $350,000 $425,000 $225,000 DEVELOPMENT ASOVE REFURBISH, RETROFIT AND CONVERT ENGINE COMPANY 23 INTO AN ARTS ENGINE COMPANY 23 ARTS CENTER 9 CENTER TO SERVE YOUTH (YR 7: $2,300,000 $262,374 $0 $400,000 $1,000,000 $637,626 PREDEVELOPMENT, YR 8: RETROFIT OF ' FIRST FLOOR) FRED ROBERTS RECREATION CENTER CONSTRUCT MODERN RECREATION (INFLATION YR 12- $938,088, as approved via 9 CENTER (YR 8: PREDEVELOPMENT, YR 9: $125,00 $3,438,088 $924,329 $2,388,75 C.F. 09-04441 DESIGN) IMPROVEMENTS TO SPORTS FIELDS, FENCING, OUTDOOR RESTROOMS, GILBERT LINDSAY 9 BUILDING RENOVATION (YRS 1-5: $50 $1,000,000 $999,500 RESTROOMS, FENCING, BLDG., YR 7: SPORTS FIELD IMPROVEMENTS) CONSTRUCT MODERN RECREATION GREEN MEADOWS RECREATION CENTER- See Long Term 9 CENTER; SPORTS FIELD IMPROVEMENTS, $7,n $3,000,000 (Long Term Bond) Bond FENCING ACQUISITION AND DEVELOPMENT OF HOPE AND VENICE AREA PARK 9 $1,000,00 $1,000,000 COMMUNITY CENTER "" CONSTRUCT MODERN RECREATION ROSS SNYDER (Inflation YR 5 $79,568; YR 6- 9 BLDG.IGYM, PARKING LOT $2,579,568 $2,731,818 $155,250) IMPROVEMENTS, SECURITY LIGHTING ' SLAUSON RECREATION CENTER (Inflation IMPROVEMENTS TO ATHLETIC FIELDS OR 9 s $1,343,916 $1,343,916 YR 11-$343,916) RECREATION CENTER IMPROVEMENTS TO ATHLETIC FIELDS; [SOUTH' PARK (Inflation YR 8- $229,874) 9 $1,229,874 $1,229,374 BANDSHELL IMPROVEMENTS '" TRINITY RECREATION CENTER 9 ACQUISITION FOR PARK EXPANSION $500,000 $0 $499,87 CD 9 TOTAL "' $18 391 446 $8491311 $2 388 759 $350 000 825 000 1 225 000 1 616 351 $499 875 EXPAND GYMNASIUM; INSTALL FENCING !ARDMORE RECREATION CENTER (Inflation 10 AND EDGE TREATMENT (YR 6: DESIGN $1,040,00 $539,87 $500,00 jYR 8- $40,000) GYM IMPROVEMENTS) "' i CONSTRUCTION OF CHILDCARE CENTER I BALDWIN HILLS RECREATION CENTER 10 TO ENHANCE RECREATIONAL $950,000 $950,000 OPPORTUNITIES FOR CHILDREN '

2009-10 Assessment Report Prepared: April 22, 2009 Page 13 of 17 PROPOSITION K: 2009-10 L.A. FOR KIDS PROGRAM Attachment 1 DRAFT FIVE YEAR PLAN FOR YEARS 13-17

l,.lfV"',I-1 , .. , .... II:;.M"F~I~ 1'-M"<> IV" II

COST OF PROPK TOTAL PROP K YR12 YR 13 YR14 Year 15 Year 16 Year 17 ! PROJECT TITLE CD PROJECT SCOPE FUNDS YRS REVIEW ALLOCATION 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 "" 1-11 IMPROVEMENTS TO ATHLETIC FIELDS & BALDWIN HILLS RECREATION CENTER 10 RECREATION CENTER; NEW $12 $1,194,052 $1,193,927 (Inflation YR 7 -$194,052) PLAYGROUND BUILDING SECURITY, SECURITY FENCING, JIM GILLIAN RECREATION CENTER 10 $500,000 $500,000 PARKING LOT IMPROVEMENTS, LIGHTING ' CONSTRUCT MODERN, MULTl-STORY RECREATION BLDG.: OUTDOOR PARK lAFAYETIE PARK (Inflation YR 11 - $1,719,582) 10 $128,72 $6,719,582 $6,590,857 DEVELOPMENT AND RESTROOMS (YEAR

7: PREDEVELOPMENT YR 8: DESIG!'jl_ • QUEEN ANNE RECREATION CENTER (Inflation ACQUISITION FOR PARK AND FACILITY 10 $125 $1,688,263 $1,688,138 YR5-$188263} EXPANSION RANCHO CIENEGA SPORTS CENTER 10 CONSTRUCT FITNESS ANNEX $2,000,000 $0 $249,875 $1,000,000 $750,000 IMPROVEMENTS TO ATHLETIC FIELDS, "' MNCHO CIENEGA SPORTS CENTER (Inflation 10 BLEACHERS, PARKING LOT, PICNIC AREA, $1,125,509 $1,125,509 YR 5- $125,509) IRRIGATION & FENCING ' REYNIER PARK 10 OUTDOOR PARK DEVELOPMENT $250,000 $250,000 "' I CD 10TOTAL $15 467 406 12 838 306 $249 875 1 500 000 750 000 $0 0 CRESTWOOD HILLS PARK (Inflation YR 9- 11 FACILITY ENHANCEMENTS $253,354 $253,229 $53 354) "' CONSTRUCTION OF CHILDCARE CENTER MAR VISTA GARDENS RECREATION CENTER 11 TO ENHANCE RECREATIONAL $1,300,000 $400,000 $100,000 $400,000 $399,875 OPPORTUNITIES FOR CHILDREN "' I OUTDOOR SPORTS FIELD MAR VISTA RECREATION CENTER (Inflation • 11 IMPROVEMENTS & FENCING; PERIMETER $1,194,052 $1,193,927 YR 7- $194,052) "~ FENCING REFURBISH, RETROFIT AND CONVERT OAKWOOD JR. ARTS CENTER 11 VENICE LlBMRY INTO A JR. ARTS $ $500,000 $0 $100,000 $400,000 CENTER OAKWOOD RECREATION CENTER (Inflation FENCING, SPORTS FIELDS, FACILITY 11 $ $1,591,350 $1,591,350 YR 5 - $91 350) ENHANCEMENTS CONSTRUCT MODERN RECREATION PACIFIC PALISADES RECREATION CENTER 11 $1,000,000 $1,000,000 CENTER ' SPORTS FIELD, IRRIGATION, ASPHALT PACIFIC PALISADES RECREATION CENTER 11 $ $500,000 $0 $100,00C $200,000 $100,000 $100,000 WALKWAY IMPROVEMENTS ! RUSTIC CANYON RECREATION CENTER 11 FACILITY ENHANCEMENTS, IRRIGATION '" $500,000 $499,875 ' OUTDOOR SPORTS FIELD STONER RECREATION CENTER (Inflation 11 IMPROVEMENTS & FENCING; PERIMETER $125 $1,000,000 $1,092,602 YR- 4 $92,602) FENCING INSTALL NEW PLAY EQUIPMENT, PICNIC VISTA DEL MAR PARK 11 $200,000 $0 $199,87!: I AREAS '" WESTCHESTER RECREATION CENTER FACILITY ENHANCEMENTS (YR 8: . 11 $1,242,000 $1,241,875 ; Inflation YR 11 - $242 000) PREDEVELOPMENTl "' CD 11 TOTAL $9,280,756 $1 272 858 $299,87 $200,000 $200 000 $600,000 $799 875 $0 OUTDOOR PARK DEVELOPMENT, :CHATSWORTH PARK SOUTH 12 $700,000 $0 $199,875 $500,000 PARKING LOT IMPROVEMENTS "' CONSTRUCT PUBLIC RESTROOMS, DEARBORN PARK 12 $500,000 $0 $100,000 $399,875 IRRIGATION "' RENOVATE BUILDING, OUTDOOR DEVONSHIRE HOUSE 12 $16,27 $500,000 $0 $50,000 $433,725 LANDSCAPING CONSTRUCT MODERN RECREATION GRANADA HILLS 12 $84.70 $3,000,000 $2,915,293 CENTER, REFURBISH SPORTS FIELDS I CONSTRUCT! ON OF CHILDCARE CENTER

MASON PARK (Inflation YR 7- $252,268) 12 TO ENHANCE RECREATIONAL $125 $1,552,268 $1,552,143 ! OPPORTUNITIES FOR CHILDREN

2009-10 Assessment Report Prepared: April 22, 2009 Page 14 of 17 PROPOSITION K: 2009-10 L.A. FOR KIDS PROGRAM Attachment 1 DRAFT FIVE YEAR PLAN FOR YEARS 13-17

u""'"''' nvo;;; J~l".r'-'"''•'"""""'"' •~·•• PROPK COST OF TOTAL PROP K YR 12 YR13 YR14 Year 15 Year 16 Year 17 PROJECT TITLE CD PROJECT SCOPE FUNDSYRS '" ALLOCATION 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 ""'~ 1-11

FACILITY ENHANCEMENTS, SPORTS NORTHRIDGE RECREATION CENTER (Inflation 12 FIELD IMPROVEMENTS (YR 8: DESIGN, YR $633,385 $633,260 YR 9- $133,385) 9: CONSTRUCTION) "' PARTHENIA PARK Inflation YR 6-$31,855 12 FACILITY ENHANCEMENTS $231,855 $231,730 CONSTRUCTION OF CHILOCARE CENTER "' WINNETKA RECREATION CENTER (Inflation 12 TO ENHANCE RECREATIONAL $1,463,161 $1,463,161 YR 5- $163,161) OPPORTUNITIES FOR CHILDREN "' CD 12 TOTAL $8 580,669 $6 795 587 $ $199 875 $650 000 $833 600 $0 ,, OUTDOOR REFURBISHMENT (YR 6: BELLEVUE RECREATION CENTER (Inflation 13 FENCING, YR 7: DESIGN, YRS 8-9: $2,459,748 $2,459,248 YR 8- $459,748) CONSTRUCTION\ '" ECHO PARK 13 IMPROVEMENTS TO ATHLETIC FIELDS $ $700,000 $700,000 BUILDING REFURBISHMENT, ADA ECHO PARK (Inflation YR 7- $194,052) 13 IMPROVEMENTS, OUTDOOR $500 $1,194,052 $1,193,552 RESTROOM$, ROADWAYS & PATHWAYS

CONSTRUCTION OF CHILDCARE CENTER ECHO PARK AREA {Inflation YR 3- $57,855) 13 TO ENHANCE RECREATIONAL $1,007,855 $1,007,730 OPPORTUNITIES FOR CHILDREN '" WATER QUALITY AND FILTRATION ECHO PARK lAKE 13 S12 $600,000 $0 $300,000 $299,875 IMPROVEMENTS AT LAKE CONSTRUCTION OF CHILDCARE CENTER GlASSELL RECREATION CENTER (Inflation 13 TO ENHANCE RECREATIONAL $1,379,037 $1,458,07<1 YR 3- $79,037) OPPORTUNITIES FOR CHILDREN "' CONSTRUCT MODERN GYM AND POOL HOLLYWOOD RECREATION CENTER 13 $12 $3,000,000 $423,634 $326,241 $100,000 $1,000,000 $1,150,000 BUILDINGS ACQUISITION FOR DEVELOPMENT INTO JUNTOS PARK 13 PARK WITH lANDSCAPING, PICNIC $11,75 $750,000 $738,245 TABLES, PlAYGROUND AND RESTROOM$ IMPROVEMENTS TO ATHLETIC FIELDS, lASORDA FIELD OF DREAMS 13 $125 $1,000,000 $0 $49,87 $200,000 $350,000 $400,000 FIELDHOUSE, & RESTROOMS See Short Term LEMON GROVE (See Short Term Bond) 13 OUTDOOR SPORTS FIELD DEVELOPMENT $1,000,000 ' Bond ACQUISITION AND DEVELOPMENT OF VIRGIL VILLAGE 13 LAND FOR SOCCER FIELD (YR 6: $16,27 $2,500,000 $1,283,138 $250,000 $479,293 $471,294 ACQUISITION\ CD 13 TOTAL $15 590,692 $9 263,621 $376 11 $300,000 $1 600 000 $2,329 293 $771169 CONSTRUCT MODERN GYMNASIUM FOR ALISO PICO 14 $1,500,000 $1,500,000 " INDOOR SPORTS ' OUTDOOR REFURBISHMENT TO INCLUDE ARROYO SECO 14 LIGHTING, NEW PlAY EQUIPMENT IN $125 $750,000 $0 $50,00 $500,000 $199,875 AREA CLOSE TO RESIDENTS, IRRIGATION EAGLE ROCK MONUMENT 14 IRRIGATION AND NEW lANDSCAPING $125 $250,000 $0 $50 000 $199 875 CONSTRUCT CH!LDCARE CENTER; EAGLE ROCK RECREATION CENTER (Inflation RENOVATION OF WALKWAYS, SLOPES, 14 $ $2,985,131 $2,985,131 YR7-$485,131) OUTDOOR STAGE, GYM, AIR CONDITIONING. IRRIGATION CONSTRUCTION OF CHILDCARE CENTER EVERGREEN RECREATION CENTER (Inflation 14 TO ENHANCE RECREATIONAL $1,203,432 $1,203,432 YR 9- $253,432) OPPORTUNITIES FOR CHILDREN ' See Short Tenn HAZARD PARK (Short Term Bond} 14 REFURBISH INTERIOR OF GYM $250,000 "' Bond OUTDOOR DEVELOPMENT: SOCCER See Short Term HAZARD PARK (Short Term Bond} 14 FIELDS, VOLLEYBALL AREA, BAR~B-Q $600,000 Bond GRILLS & TABLES, LIGHTING, WALKWAYS "'

2009-10 Assessment Report Prepared: April 22, 2009 Page 15 of 17

·--··-~'' . -~ ·- PROPOSITION K: 2009-10 L.A. FOR KIDS PROGRAM Attachment 1 DRAFT FIVE YEAR PLAN FOR YEARS 13-17

DRAFT FIVE YEAR PLAN, YEARS 13~17 PROPK COST OF TOTAL PROP K YR12 YR 13 YR14 Year 15 Year 16 Year11 PROJECT TITLE CD PROJECT SCOPE FUNDS YRS REVIEW ALLOCATION 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 '" 1-11

REFURBISH, RETROFIT AND CONVERT HIGHlAND PARK JR. ARTS CENTER 14 $10,00 $1,800,000 $0 $100,00 $450,000 $450,000 $790,000 CITY BUILDING INTO A JR. ARTS CENTER IMPROVE PARKING FACILITIES, WALKWAYS & LIGHTING, DRINKING HOLLENBECK PARK {lnfiation YR 6 • $63,710) 14 $463,710 $463,585 FOUNTAINS, WATER SYSTEM, "' BANDSHELL CONSTRUCT A GYMNASIUM FOR INDOOR PECAN PARK (Inflation YR 7- $485,131} 14 $125 $2,985,131 $2,985,006 SPORTS RAMON GARCIA RECREATION CENTER OUTDOOR PARK DEVELOPMENT, 14 $506,708 $506,708 Inflation YR 9- $106,708) PARKING ' OUTDOOR PARK DEVELOPMENT, SAN PASQUAL (Inflation YR 5- $50,204) 14 $450,204 $500,28 IRRIGATION '" CONSTRUCT MODERN RECREATION YOSEMITE RECREATION CENTER (Inflation 14 CENTER, OUTDOOR PARK $2,731,818 $2,731,818 YR4- $152,250, YR5 $79,568) DEVELOPMENT IRRIGATION '" CD 14 TOTAL $16 476 13 $12 875 963 $150,000 $1,000,000 $849 750 $790 000 so $ OUTDOOR SPORTS DEVELOPMENT, FIELD 109TH STREET RECREATION CENTER 15 s $500,000 $500,000 LIGHTING IMPROVEMENTS TO ATHLETIC FIELDS, BANNING PARK 15 RECREATION CENTER AND WALKING $1,000,000 $999,875 PATHS '" CONSTRUCT MODERN RECREATION EAST WILMINGTON (Inflation YR 4- $185,454) 15 $6,62 $2,185,454 $2,185,329 CENTER GAFFEY STREET POOL 15 RENOVATION OF SWIMMING POOL '$1,000,000 $0 $200,00 ACQUISITION AND DEVELOPMENT OF "' NORMANDALE RECREATION CENTER 15 $10,00 $2,000,000 $0 $1,000,000 $990,000 LAND FOR PARK EXPANSION IMPROVEMENTS TO ATHLETIC FIELDS, POOLS, OR RECREATION CENTER, PECK PARK 15 $1,000,000 $500,000 $350,000 $150,000 PARKING LOT, WALKWAYS, IRRIGATION, ' PICNIC AREAS CONSTRUCTION OF CHILDCARE CENTER ROSECRANS RECREATION CENTER 15 TO ENHANCE RECREATIONAL $1,300,000 $0 $100,000 $199,875 $1,000,000 OPPORTUNITIES FOR CHIL'DREN "' WATTS JR. ARTS CENTER {Inflation YR 8- ACQUIRE AND CONSTRUCT A JR. ARTS 15 $3,689,62 $3,889,427 $689,622) CENTER ' RENOVATE GYM, NEW BASEBALL FIELD WILMINGTON RECREATION CENTER 15 $1,500,000 $1,499,875 AND LIGHTS, IRRIGATION, PARKING LOT "' CO 15 TOTAL 14175.076 $9 574 506 • $350 000 $250 000 1199675 $1 990 000 $200 00 LOCAL SUBTOTAL $195,359,761 $132,252,257 $5,764,70 $5,318,250 $8,602,800 $10,772,705 $10,963,008 $3,399,87

REGIONAL AND LOCAL SUBTOTAL $316,979,077 $171,847,687 $11,414,70 $9,061,107 $13,170.134 $14,524,95 $13,339,733 $9,173,60 Information Technology Agency (funding set-aside for all regions) $0 $0 ' $50,000 $50,000 $50,00 $50,000 $50,00G TOTAL ALL PROJECTS INCLUDES All PREDEVELOPMENT, $418,044,32 $233,298,072 $19,284,404 $14,949,634 $20,753,330 $20,742,792 $19,742,610 $15,767,06 COMPETITIVE GRANTS, REGIONA PROJECTS AND LOCAL PROJECTS OTHER COSTS ADMINISTRATION NA $22 500 000 $7,615,344 $743,08 $748 964 $754,896 $760,874 $766,899 $772.97 MAINTENANCE NA $112 500,000 $11,955,641 $2,372,05 $2,567,711 $2,779,50 $3.008,773 $3,256,949 $3,525,59 INFLATION NA $0 $2,600,46 $3644,70 $3,754,048 $3,866,669 $3,982,669 $4,102,14, DEBT SERVICE FOR SHORT TERM BOND NA $5,486,725 $ $0 $0 $0 s DEBT SERVICE FOR LONG-TERM BOND NA $23 798,673 $3,088,9841 $3,056,049 $3,049,064 $3,052,184 $3,055,33. OTHER COSTS TOTAL $48 856 582 $5,715,59' $10,050,36 $10,344,500 $10,685,38 $11,058,701 $11,45fi,OS1j

GRAND TOTAL $282,154,65 $25,000,00 S25,000,00IJ $'31,107,83 $31,428,17 $30,801,311 $27,223,12~

2009-10 Assessment Report Prepared: April 22, 2009 Page 16 of 17 PROPOSITION K: 2009-10 L.A. FOR KIDS PROGRAM Attachment 1 DRAFT FIVE YEAR PLAN FOR YEARS 13-17

DRAFT FIVE YEAR PLAN, YEARS 13·17 PROP K COST OF TOTAL PROP K YR12 YR 13 YR14 Year15 Year 16 Year 17 PROJECT TITLE CD PROJECT SCOPE FUNDSYRS REVIEW ALLOCATION 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 ""' 1-11 2013-14 J

SHORT TERM BORROWING BLOCK WALL REPAIR ON PERIMETER, RETAINING WALL, LIGHTHOUSE POINT FERMIN PARK REG $2,000,000 IMPROVEMENTS AND IRRIGATION UPGRADE WATER QUALITY AND FILTRATION LINCOLN PARK LAKE 1 $600,000 IMPROVEMENTS AT LAKE "' FACILITY RENOVATION, BALL FIELD SHADOW RANCH 3 $1,500,000 IMPROVEMENTS, FENCING, IRRIGATION "' LEMON GROVE 13 OUTDOOR SPORTS FIELD DEVELOPMENT $125 $1,000,000

OUTDOOR DEVELOPMENT: SOCCER FIELDS, VOLLEYBALL AREA, BARBEQUE HAZARD PARK 14 $850,000 GRILLS & TABLES, LIGHnNG, WAUWJAYS, • REFURBISH INTERIOR OF GYM SHORT BOND TOTAL $5 950 000 LONG TERM BONDING CHILDREN'S MUSEUM -Com etitlve REG BUILD CHILDREN'S MUSEUM $100,00 $9 567,800 EXPAND AND ENHANCE EDUCATION WING TO INCLUDE MORE TEACHING CABRILLO AQUARIUM REG $20,00 $5,000,000 LABS, DISCOVERY LAB, COLLECTION STORAGE & H20 SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS IMPLEMENTATION OF MASTER PLAN OBSERVATORY REG $ $10,000,000 IMPROVEMENTS SANTA MONICA MOUNTAINS- Com etitive REG ACQUISITION OF MANDEVILLE CANYON $ $3,000,000 ACQUISITION OF BUILDING & SOUTH CENTRAL SPORTS ACTIVITY CENTER REG $22,92 $2,750,000 DEVELOPMENT CONSTRUCT AND DEVELOP CHILDREN'S zoo REG $13,97 $11,000,000 DISCOVERY AREA VICTORY VINELAND CHILDCARE CENTER- 2 BUILD A CHILDCARE CENTER $ $2,100,000 Competitive CONSTRUCT MODERN RECREATION GREEN MEADOWS 8 CENTER, SPORTS FIELD IMPROVEMENTS, $7,77 $3,000,000 FENCING RANCHO CIENEGA CHILDCARE CENTER· 10 BUILD A CHILDCARE CENTER $ $2,100,000 Comoetitive EL CENTRO DEL PUEBLO- Com etitive 13 RENOVATE EXISTING FACILITIES $3,25 $943,240 LAUSD WASHINGTON IRVING MIDDLE 13 CREATE PARK AND SPORTS FIELDS $1,374,700 SCHOOL- Competitive • LONG BOND TOTAL $50 835 740 GRAND TOTAL $56,785,740

• Total Prop K Allocation column includes Healthy Alternatives to Smoking (HATS) funding

~·TotalProp K Allocation column Proposition 12 Roberti-Z'berg-Harris funding

2009-10 Assessment Report Prepared: April 22, 2009 Page 17 of 17 PROPOSITION K: 2009-10 L.A. FOR KIDS PROGRAM Attachment 2 DRAFT 2009-10 A LIST (YEAR 13)

TOTALPROPK YR13 PROJECT TITLE CD REGION PROJECT SCOPE ALLOCATION 2009-10

COMPETITIVE GRANTS REG & PARKS: DOWNEY POOL 6th C cle 1 CENTRAL CHILDREN'S WATER PLAY AREA IN POOL FACILITY $500,00 $500,00 REG & PARKS: LINCOLN POOL 6th Cycle 1 CENTRAL /CHILDREN'S WATER PLAY AREA IN POOL FACILITY $500 000 $500,000 CO 1 TOTAL 1 000 000 $1 000 000 REG & PARKS: ORO VISTA PARK DEVELOPMENT (6TH 2 VALLEY DEVELOPMENT OF A PASSIVE PARK $350,000 $280,00 Cvclel CD 2 TOTAL 350 000 280 000 INSTALL NEW SYNTHETIC SOCCER FIELD ON EXISTING TURF FIELD, MODIFY REG & PARKS: DELANO PARK (6th Cycle) 6 VALLEY $1,000,000 $800,00 IRRIGATION REC & PARKS: SHELDON ARLETA (4th cycle) Includes CONSTRUCTION OF 3 SOCCER FIELDS (2 WITH liGHTS), 2 BASEBALL FIELDS 6 VALLEY $803,878 $400,00 reoroorammed funds of $203 878. SECURITY liGHTING PARKING IRRIGATION DRINKING FOUNTAINS FENCING. CO 6TOTAL 1 803 878 1 200 000 REC & PARKS: ELDORADO ACQUISITION 6th C cle 7 VALLEY !ACQUISITION $500 000 $500.00 CD7TOTAL 500 000 500 coo REFURBISH TURF, REPLACE FENCING/BACK STOP FABRIC, INSTALL AWNINGS ON REG & PARKS: HARVARD RECREATION CENTER (6th 8 SOUTHERN DUGOUTS, REPLACE IRRIGATION/ELECTRICAL PANEL ENCLOSURE, REPLACE $712,00 $562.00 Cycle) BLEACHERS & PADS, NEW WALKING/JOGGING PATH AROUND PERIMETER CD 8 TOTAL 712 000 562 000 LTSC COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION (6th 9 SOUTHERN LITTLE TOKYO RECREATION CENTER $250,000 $250,00 Cycle) CD 9 TOTAL 250 000 $250 000 REG & PARKS: BENNY POTTER PARK (6th Cycle) 10 SOUTHERN GREENING, IRRIGATION, PICNIC AREA, PATH WITH OUTDOOR FITNESS STATIONS $655,00 $547,24' CO 10 TOTAL $655 000 547 2 REPLACE INFIELDS, LEVEURESEED OUTFIELD, REPLACE IRRIGATION SYSTEM, REG & PARKS: CHATSWORTH PARK NORTH {6th Cycle) 12 VALLEY $248,283 $248,28 REPLACE FENCE FABRIC NEW BLEACHERS DRINKING FOUNTAINS CD 12 TOTAL 248 283 248 283 REC & PARKS: COSTELLO POOL 6th C cle 14 CENTRAL CHILDREN'S WATER PLAY AREA IN POOL FACIUTY $500,000 $500 DO CD 14 TOTAL 500.. 000 500 00 REG & PARKS: EAST WILMINGTON GREENBELT PARK DEVELOPMENT OF SOFTBALL, SOCCER FIELD, PLAYAREA AND RELATED 15 SOUTHERN $1,000,000 $100,000 5th cvclel AMEN!TIES. REG & PARKS: 109TH STREET RECREATION CENTER 15 SOUTHERN AQUATIC UPGRADES $651,000 $651,00 6th Cycle) CD 15 TOTAL $1 651 000 751 000

COMPETITIVE GRANTS TOTAL $7,670,161 $5,838,527

REGIONAL PROJECTS

ANGELS GATE PARK REG SOUTHERN IMPLEMENTATION OF MASTER PLAN IMPROVEMENTS AND PERIMETER FENCING $2,000,000 $150,00 REFURBISHMENT OF BUILDING AND GARDEN IMPROVEMENTS (YR 8: BUILDING BANNING MUSEUM {Inflation YR 9 ~$80,031) REG SOUTHERN $2,080,031 $350,000 REFURBISHMENTS.) ACQUISITION OF ADDJTIONAL LAND, IMPROVEMENTS TO ATHLETIC FIELDS & ELYSIAN PARK REG CENTRAL $5,000,000 $100,00 TRAILS, ROAD REFURBISHMENT, LIGHTING, RESTROOMS IMPROVEMENTS TO ROADS, TRAILS, WATER SYSTEM, REST ROOMS, PICNIC GRIFFITH PARK REG CENTRAL AREAS, PAVE LIVE STEAMERS PARKING LOT {YR 4: RESTROOM$ FOR SHANE'S $5,000,00 $100,00 INSPIRATION) SOCCER COMPLEX, RV PARK, RANGER STAT!ONNJSITOR'S CENTER, ROAD/TRAIL HANSEN DAM REG VALLEY IMPROVEMENTS, FENCING (YR 4&5: SOCCER COMPLEX, YR 7: PREDEVELOPMENT $10,000,000 $50,00 FOR FUTURE SCOPE\ LAND ACQUISITION, GREENING ALONG AREA OF ENCINO, SHERMAN OAKS, LOS ANGELES RIVERFRONT PARK REG VALLEY $10,000,00 $692,857 STUDIO CITY (YR 7: PREOEVELOPMENT, YR 8: DESIGN, YRS 9-11: CONSTRUCTION)

2009-1 0 Assessment Report Prepared: Apnl22, 2009 Page1of2

~----·,----,~·'- PROPOSITION K: 2009-10 L.A. FOR KIDS PROGRAM Attachment 2 DRAFT 2009-10 A LIST (YEAR 13)

TOTAL PROP K YR13 PROJECT TITLE CD REGION PROJECT SCOPE ALLOCATION 2009~10

BIKEPATH; PARKING; PICNIC AND RESTROOM FACiliTIES; SOCCER FIELD SEPULVEDA BASIN REG VALLEY $5,000,000 $1,950,000 DEVELOPMENT IYR 7: ?REDEVELOPMENT) SEPULVEDA BASIN~HJELTE FIELD REG VALLEY NEW ATHLETIC FIELDS LIGHTING PARKING $1 000 00 $350.000 REGlONAL PROJECTS TOTAL $40,080,031 $3,742,857

LOCAL PROJECTS OUTDOOR REFURBISHMENT INCLUDING ATHLETIC AND PICNIC FACILITIES, LINCOLN PARK 1 CENTRAL ROADWAYS, RESTROOM$, EROSION CONTROL, IRRIGATION (YR 8: ATHLETIC AND $2,000,00 $508,750 PICNIC FACILITIES ROADWAYS) CD 1 TOTAL 2 000 000 $508 750 ROBERT BURNS PARK 4 CENTRAL FACILITY ENHANCEMENTS $200,00 $199,875 RUNYON CANYON PARK 4 CENTRAL PROPERTY ACQUISITION FOR PARK EXPANSION $2 500 000 $100 000 WATTLES PARK 4 CENTRAL EROSION AND DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS $500 00 $399 875 IMPROVEMENTS TO ATHLETIC FIELDS, SWIMMING POOLS, OR RECREATION WEST WILSHIRE (Inflation YR 9- $114,711) 4 CENTRAL $1,114,711 $270,000 CENTER (YR 9: ATHLETIC FIELDS) CD4 TOTAL 4314711 $969 750 POINSETTIA RECREATION CENTER 5 CENTRAL ACQUIRE LAND FOR PARKING LOT, BUILDING AND lANDSCAPE REFURBISHMENT $2,000,00 $150,000 CD 5TOTAL 2 000 000 150 000 BRANFORD RECREATION CENTER 6 VALLEY OUTDOOR REFURBISHMENT: BALL DIAMONDS, PAVING, IRRIGATION, GYM FLOOR $1,000,000 $150,00

COG TOTAL $~000 000 $150 000 MANCHESTER JR. ARTS CENTER (Vision Theatre) I 8 SOUTHERN REFURBISH, RETROFIT AND CONVERT CITY BUILDING INTO A JR. ARTS CENTER $1,800,000 $640,000 ST. ANDREWS RECREATION CENTER 8 SOUTHERN OUTDOOR SPORTS DEVELOPMENT $500 00 $250 00 CD 8 TOTAL 2 300 000 890 000 CENTRAL RECREATION CENTER 9 SOUTHERN BUILDING REFURBISHMENT AND PARK DEVELOPMENT $1 ooo000 $350 000 CDS TOTAL 1 000 000 350 000 RANCHO C!ENEGA SPORTS CENTER 10 SOUTHERN CONSTRUCT FITNESS ANNEX $2 000 00 $249,875 CD 10 TOTAL $2 000 00 $249 875 PACIFIC PALISADES RECREATION CENTER 11 CENTRAL SPORTS FIELD, IRRIGATION ASPHALTWALJI\>NAY IMPROVEMENTS $500 000 $200 000 CD 11 TOTAL 500 000 200 000 CHATSWORTH PARK SOUTH I 12 VALLEY OUTDOOR PARK DEVELOPMENT PARKING LOT IMPROVEMENTS $700 00 $199 875 CD 12 TOTAL $700 000 $199.875 HOLLYWOOD RECREATION CENTER 13 CENTRAL CONSTRUCT MODERN GYM AND POOL BUILDINGS $3 000 00 $100 00 lASORDA FIELD OF DREAMS 13 CENTRAL IMPROVEMENTS TO ATHLETIC FIELDS FIELDHOUSE & RESTROOMS $1 000 000 $200 00 CD 13 TOTAL 4 000 000 300 000 OUTDOOR REFURBISHMENT TO INCLUDE LIGHTING, NEW PLAY EQUIPMENT !N ARROYO SECO 14 CENTRAL $750,000 $500,000 AREA CLOSE TO RESIDENTS, IRRIGATION EAGLE ROCK MONUMENT 14 CENTRAL IRRIGATION AND NEW LANDSCAPING $250 000 $50 000 HIGHLAND PARK JR. ARTS CENTER 14 CENTRAL REFURBISH, RETROFIT AND CONVERT CITY BUILDING INTO A JR. ARTS CENTER $1,800,000 $450,000 CD 14 TOTAL 2 BOO000 1 000 000 IMPROVEMENTS TO ATHLETIC FIELDS, POOLS, OR RECREATION CENTER, PECK PARK 15 SOUTHERN $1,000,00 $350,000 PARKING LOT, WALJI\>NAYS, IRRIGATION, PICNIC AREAS

CO 15 TOTAL $~000 000 $350 000 LOCAL SUBTOTAL $23,614,711 $5,318,250

REGIONAL AND LOCAL SUBTOTAL $63,694,742 $9,061,107

TOTAL ALL PROJECTS $63,694,74 $14,899,634

2009-10 Assessment Report Prepared: April22, 2009 Page 2 of 2 PROPOSITION K: 2009-10 L.A. FOR KIDS PROGRAM Attachment 3 DRAFT B LIST FOR YEARS 14-17

TOTAL PROP K TOTAL 8 LIST IPRO. CD REGION !PROJECT SCOPE I Ill ALLOCATION FUNDING

IIIVt: GRANI:S

~PEAK (5th 4 I CENTRAL S755,00( ~ ~7,;~nnr R.EC & PARKS: EAST 11U; T PARK (5th 15 ! SOUTHERN I DEVELOPMENT OF SOFTBALL, SOCCER FIELD, PLAY AREA AND RELATED AMENITIES. $1,000,00( ~.((nnnnr Icy_c~1_ CD 15TOTAL $.1.000.00C COMPETITIVE GRANTS TOTAL $1 ,755,00( $1,555,00(]

BALBOA SPORTS COMPLEX REG VALLEY CONSTRUCT NEW :FACILITY REFURBISHMENT OF 3AND \1 IIVWKUVt:.IVIt:.l\11 S {YR 8:

$1n nnn nn1 'l:? F=;~?~n. -··· ···-· MACARTHUR PARK LAKE WATER QUALITY AND FILTRATION IMPROVEMENTS AT LAKE

:-ni="~T~r::~\IAII FY TRAILS ~~~·_:::..:_::.:::.~_·:_":::.:_::::.~,·-·, "', ~·-~~-~, ''" ""' -~-~,,"' "' , , ""~~, ~, -···,.,, , . 5i? non nnr s:1 oon on1

31TION AND CONSTRUCt1CYN OF ROLLER AND SKATEBOARD RINK IN S/ESAN S/E VALLEY ROLLER & SKATEBOARD RINK REG VALLEY ~NDOVALLEY ~ .~~~.~~~ ~~.~ ~. -~

VALLEY jljlt\t:t"'ATH; PARKING; PICNIC AND RESTROOM FACILITIES; SOCCER FIELD $S OOO $ SSS SEPULVE BASIN REG oor 1 587 !DEVELOPMENT IYR 7: ?REDEVELOPMENT) • · v' • • t..BASIN- HJELTE FIEL REG VALLEY NEW ATHLETIC FIELDS, LIGHTING, PARKING $1 000 00 $418 0"'"

C1.BASIN- LAKE BALBO VALLEY UPGRADE IRRIGATION SYSTEM TO WATER CONSERVATION Sl "ANDARDS $2,000 000 $299 THERN BEAUTIFICATION OF RAIL ROAD RIGHT OF WAY FROM LA RlVl:.R 10 CULl~ !SOUTHERN PACIFIC TRAILS REG SOU EUM, ot? knn nnn ¢1 A.nn nnnl ' • .. n_~r.o.PII\11";,TRAILS.

REGIONAL PROJECTS TOTAl ~'I0,4tu,u.::~

:LOCAl OUTDOORi 3 ATHLETIC AND PICNIC FACILITIES, 'LINCOLN PARK CENTRAL ROADWAYS, Kt.:::>IKUUMti, CONTROL, IRRIGATION (YR 8: ATHLETIC AND $2,000;00 $408,55( I :FACILITIES.--·-··· ) 000

STONEHURS~ ~LEY FACILI 1 nno STUDIO CITY LEY CONS-

2009-10 Assessment Report Prepared: April 22., 2009 Page1of3

~------~--~-~~---··~~·----·· PROPOSITION K: 2009-10 L.A. FOR KIDS PROGRAM Attachment 3 DRAFT B LIST FOR YEARS 14-17

TOTAL PROP K TOTAL B LIST CD REGION IPROJECT SCOPE 'PROJECT TITLE ALLOCATION FUNDING

A. SY..ATEFACILITY 3 ACQUISITION AND CONSTRUCTIONtUCTION OF ICE HOCKEYHO AND ROLLER BLADING3 FACILITY $4,000 000 $3 978 72~ RK 3 CONSTRUCT PUBLIC RESTROOMS $250,000 ,....,.,., ""'' $4.250,001 GKit-t-11 H RECREATION CENTER (Inflation YR 7 A$97,026) RUNYON CANYON PARK

RECREATION CENTER COS TOTAl $1.100,00( CENTER _Q_ VALLEY /OUTDOOR J GYrvn=Locm-···- $1,000,000 SEPULVEDA RECREATION CENTER 6 VALLEY IOUTDOOR REFURBISHMENT; IMPROVEMENTS TO ATHLETIC FIELDS, SWIMMING POOL $500,00C SUN VALLEY REG CENTER $500 --- SUN VALLEY RECREATION CENTER 6 $2oD. CD 6 TOTAL $2 2~ ANDREA! RENOVATEOUTDOORAREAS RESTROOMS LIGHTING $70Q'].v ~v,v,o

MID VALLEY MULTI : Vt:l'll t:R (Inflation YR 2- ~- 7 VALLEY ~~~-~-~0C~~~~f::~CT NEW SENIOR CENTER AND MULTIPURPOSE $ 2.525_961 $O $<5 961) RITCHIE VALENS liON CENTER (Inflation YR 8- 7 VALLEY I SPORTS FIELD LIGHTING $307.4681 $0 I'tl';7 ii.F:R\ VALLEY CONO rRUCTION OF CHILDCARE CENTER TO !!UNP Rn~FR .IESSUP RECREATION CENTER 7 $1,300,oooJ $1,130,000 OPPORTUNlTfES FOR CHILDREN JN RANCH 7 VALLEY lAND ACQUISITION, FACILITY EXPANSION $1,000,00( CDI T_OTAL

I ALGIN ~RECREATION CENTER __§_ RN CONSTRUCTION OF NEW POOL BUll t JR. ARTS CEN1 ITHERN REFURBISH, RETROFIT AND CONVE TY _1' ~ "ION CENTER .TS DEVELOPMENT 1-2-L $1,149,75q CENTRAL RECREATION CENT! _$1.000,00C CENTRAL RECREATION CENT!

JENG!NE COMPANY 23 ARTS CENTER 9 $2,300,00( $2,037,626

JN $500,00( $499. $4.166.:t.-. ; INSTALL J EDGE TREATMENT (YR 8: DESIGN GYM RECREATION CENTER (Inflation YR 8- $40,000) 10 / SOUTHERN !EXPAND'-'.. ·---· ·-·. $1.rl..f.(l o;:~;nnnnr

RANCHQ! RN_jCONSTRU_<: ~ANNEX $1,7501000 0,000 SOUTHERN (.;UN::; rRUCTION OF CHILDCARE CENTER TO t:.NHAN(.;l:: Kt:.t.;KI=AI !UNA jMAR VISTA GARDENS RECREATION CENTER 11 ~1:<.nn nnnl <;;J=tqq F\7.1:; OPPORTUNITIES FOR CHILDREN ) JR, ARTS CE:tffER . 11 SOUTHERN REFURBISH RETROFIT AND CONVERT VENICE LIBRARY INTO A JR. U .. ._CENIBAL,_ SPO_FU§_FIELD.IR.RIGATION, ASPHAI.oT\IYALKWAX:lMPROV_gM_f_:NTS -----· j $506-.ooo $2.300.000 $1 -1PARK SOUTH OUTDOOR PARK DEVE $700,oooi IDE \I PARK CONSTRUCT PUBLIC RESTROOMS IRRIGATION $500 000 ~ ..:.:..:="-- Bf:.NOVAJJ;J3Uil01NG OUTDOOR lANDSCAPING SSOO,OOC CD 12 TOTAL $1,700,000 $1,483,600

2009-10 Assessment Report Prepared: Aprll 22, 2009 Page2of3 PROPOSITION K: 2009-10 L.A. FOR KIDS PROGRAM Attachment 3 DRAFT B LIST FOR YEARS 14-17

TOTAL PROP K TOTAL B LIST PROJECT TITLE CD REGION PROJECT SCOPE I ALLOCATION FUNDING

1LITY AND FILTRATION IMPROVEMENTS AT LAI $599,87E 13 r MODERN GYM AND POOL BUILDINGS 1., FIELD OF ..E. ) ATHLETIC FIELDS FIELDHOUSE, & $1,000,00

IVIRGIL ~ILLAGE 13 CENTRAL IACQUISITION AND DEVELOPMENT OF LAND FOR SOCCER FIELD (YR 6: ACQUISITION) $1_200_581 CD 13 TOTAL $7.100,0001 :LIGHTING, NEW PLAY EQUIPMENT IN AREA AKKUYU SECO 14 CENTRAL $750,000 $199,87E EAGLE ROCK MONUMEN- ...!.± . ARTtfCENTER 14 ~INTOA JR. ARTS 1,800,000 2 800.000 £ lUVA 1 000 000 ....!§_ ACQUISITION AND DEVELOPMENT OF LAND FOR PARK EXI ~non non SOUTHERN IMPROVEMENTS TO ATHLETIC FIELDS, POOLS, OR CENTER, PECK PARK '" 15 $1,000,000 $150,000 I LOT WALKVVAYS IRRIGATION PICNIC AREAS SOUTHERN CONSTRUCTION OF CHILDCARE CENTER TO ENHAI RECREATION CENTER 15 $1,300,000 $1 ,299,e ~~~---· '''ITn=S_FQ_R CHILDREN CD 15 TOTAL

LOCAL SUBTOTAL S:J;!=I..4Rn_?m $33.738.38~

REGIONAL AND LOCAL SUBTOTAl ' ..~

2009-10 Assessment Report Prepared: April 22, 2009 Page 3 of 3 Proposition K: 2009-10 L.A. For Kids Program Attachment 4 Projected General Fund Impact: RAP Maintenance

Annual Estimate of RAP Maintenance Costs Projected General Fund Impact

PROJECT TITLE CD PROJECT SCOPE Other Annual YR13 YR 14 Yead5 Year 16 Year17 Salaries Materials Contractor Costs Total 2009~10 2.010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14

COMPETITIVE GRANTS

REG & PARKS: DOWNEY POOL CONSTRUCTION OF A CHILDREN'S WATER 1 $13,572 $2,000 $0 $0 $15,57 $0 $12,977 $15,572 $15,572 $15,572.0( ENHANCEMENT PLAY AREA (SPLASH PAD) IN POOL FACILITY REG & PARKS: LINCOLN POOL CHILDREN'S WATER PLAY AREA IN POOL 1 $13,57 $2,000 $0 $0 $15,57 $0 $0 $10,381 $15,572 $15,572.0( ENHANCEMENT FACILITY CO 1 Total $271 $4000 $0 $0 $311 $0 $1.'2:9 $25 953 $3114 $3114< DEVELOPMENT OF A PASSIVE PARK INCLUDING, DEMOLITION OF A DETERIORATED VACANT BUILDING, GRADING, IRRIGATION, OPEN SPACE WITH REG & PARKS: ORO VISTA 2 PLANTING, DECOMPOSED GRANITE $13,572 $2,000 $0 $0 $15,57 $0 $0 $14,274 $15,572 $15,57: PARK DEVELOPMENT WALKING TRAILS, A PERMANENT RESTROOM BUILDING, PICNIC TABLES, CHILDREN'S PLAY AREA, HORSE TRAILER PARK CD 2 Total $13 57 $2000 $0 $0 $15 57 $0 $0 $14 27 $15 572 $15 57: CONSTRUCTION OF 3 SOCCER FIELDS (2 SHELDON ARLETA (4th cycle) WITH LIGHTS), 2 BASEBALL FIELDS Includes reprogrammed funds Of 6 $60,162 $10,000 $22,500 $0 $92,66 $0 $38,609 $92,662 $92,66: SECURITY LIGHTING PARKING IRRIGATION, $0 $203,878. DRINKING FOUNTAINS. FENCING,

DELANO PARK (Synthetic Soccer 1.1NSTALL NEW SYNTHETIC SOCCER FIELD 6 $13.572 $1,000 $0 $0 $14,57 $0 $1'3,358 $14,572 $14,57: Field) ON EXISTING FIELD TURF; 2.lRRIGATION. $0

CD 6 Total $73 734 $11 000 $22 500 $0 $107 23 $0 $0 $51 967 $107 23 107 23• REG & PARKS: ElDORADO ACQUISITION (11349 ElDorado 7 ACQUISlTION OF OPEN SPACE $0 $0 $27,500 $0 $27,50 $0 $0 $0 $25,208 $27,50( Avenue) CO 7 Total $0 $0 $27 500 $0 $27 50 $0 $ $G $25 208 $27 501 1 Refurbish turf 2 Replace fencing/back stop fabric REG & PARKS: HARVARD 3 Install awnings on dugouts and new RECREATION CENTER (Athletic 8 $70,162 $8,500 $0 $0 $78,66 $0 $ $39,331 $78,662 $78,66: walking/jogging path around perimeter Field Improvements) 4 Replace irrigation/electrical paneUbleachers & Ipads CD 8 Total $70 162 $8 500 $0 $0 $78 66 $0 $0 $39 331 $78,662 $78 56: REG & PARKS: BENNY POTIER GREENING, lRRIGAT!ON, PICNIC AREA, PATH PARK IMPROVEMENTS (2nd 10 $13,572 $500 $0 $0 $14,07 $0 $0 $12,899 $14,072 $14,07: WITH OUTDOOR FITNESS STATIONS Streetl CD 10 Tota $13 57 $500 $0 $0 $14 07 $0 $0 $12,899 $14 072 $14 07: 1 Replace infields, Jeveltreseed outfield REC & PARKS: CHATSWORTH 2 Replace inigation system NORTH (Athletic Field 12 $72,566 $20,000 $3,500 $0 $96,06 $0 $0 $0 $88,061 $96,061 3 Replace fence fabric Improvements) 4 New bleachers/drinking fountain CD 12 Total $72 566 $20 000 $3,500 $0 $9606 $0 $0 $0 $88 061 $96,06! REG & PARKS: COSTELLO CONSTRUCTION OF A CHILDREN'S WATER 14 $13,572 $2,000 $0 so $15,57 $0 $0 $10,381 $15,572 $15,57: POOL ENHANCEMENT PLAY AREA (SPlASH PAD) IN POOL FACILITY CD 14 Total $13 572 $2 000 $0 $0 $15 57 $0 $0 $10 381 $15 572 $15 57:

2009-10 Assessment Report Attach 4 - RAP Maintenance for A !islxls Page 1 of j Proposition K: 2009-10 L.A. For Kids Program Attachment 4 Projected General Fund Impact: RAP Maintenance

Annual Estimate of RAP Maintenance Costs Projected General Fund Impact

PROJECT TITLE CD PROJECT SCOPE other Annual YR 13 YR 14 Year 15 Year16 Year17 Salaries Materials Contractor Costs Total 2009~10 2010~11 2011·12 2012·13 2013-14

REG & PARKS: EAST DEVELOPMENT OF SOFTBALL, SOCCER WILMINGTON GREENBELT 15 $55,634 $2,000 $0 $0 $57,63< $0 $0 $0 $33,620 $57,63- FIELD, PlAY AREA AND RElATED AMENITIES. PARK (Proposed 5t~cycle) REC & PARKS: 109TH STREET CHILDREN'S WATER PlAY AREA IN POOL RECREATION CENTER (Pool 15 $18,572 $4,000 $0 $0 $22,57 $0 $0 $15,048 $22,572 $22,57 FACILITY Renovation) CD 15 Total $74 206 $6 000 $0 $0 $80 20 $0 $0 $15 048 $56 192 $80 20 COMPETITIVE GRANTS TOTAL $358,528 $54,000 $53,500 $0 $466,02 $0 $12,977 $169,85 $431,716 $466,02 REGIONAL PARKS ACQU!S!T!ON OF ADDITIONAL LAND, IMPROVEMENTS TO ATHLETIC FIELDS & ELYS!AN PARK REG $250,649 $20,000 $0 $27,549 $298,19 so $0 $273,348 $298,198 $298,19€ TRAILS, ROAD REFURBISHMENT, LIGHTING, RESTROOMS ANGELS GATE PARK REG IMPLEMENTATION OF MASTER PlAN $73,734 $0 $0 $15,000 $88.73 $0 $0 $0 $81,340 $88,73

IMPROVEMENTS TO ROADS, TRAILS, WATER SYSTEM, REST ROOMS, PICNIC AREAS, GRIFFITH PARK REG $250,649 $20,000 $0 $27,549 $298,19 $0 $0 $273,348 $298,198 $298,19€ PAVE LIVE STEAMERS PARKING LOT (YR 4: RESTROOMS FOR SHANE'S INSPIRATION)

SOCCER COMPLEX, RV PARK, RANGER STATIONNIS!TOR'S CENTER, ROAD!TRAIL IMPROVEMENTS, FENCING (YR 4&5: SOCCEF HANSEN DAM (Valley Region) REG $248,649 $50,000 $0 $0 $298.64 $0 $0 $149,32-5 $298,649 $298,64 COMPLEX, YR 7: ?REDEVELOPMENT FOR UNCOMPLETED SCOPE TO BE DONE IN YRS 8-11) LAND ACQUISITION, GREENING ALONG LOS ANGELES RIVERFRONT AREA OF ENCINO, SHERMAN OAKS, STUDIO REG $46,590 $20,000 $5,000 $0 $71,59 $0 $0 $35,795 571,590 $71,59( PARK {Valley Region) CITY (YR 7: ?REDEVELOPMENT, YR 8:

DESIGN, YRS 9~11: CONSTRUCTION) BIKEPATH: PARKING; PICNIC AND SEPULVEDA BASIN REG RESTROOM FACILITIES; SOCCER FIELD $254,523 $16,300 $5,000 $0 $275,82 $0 $0 $0 $252,838 $275,82 DEVELOPMENT(YR7:PREDEVELOPMENTl SEPULVEDA BASIN¥ HJELTE Fl REG NEW ATHLETIC FIELDS, LIGHTING, PARKING $19,575 $5,000 $5,000 $0 $29,57 $0 $0 $0 $0 $ REFURBISHMENT OF BUILDING AND BANNING MUSEUM (Inflation YR REG GARDEN IMPROVEMENTS (YR 8: BUILDING $13,572 $0 $0 $10,240 $23,81 $0 $0 $0 $21,828 $23,81 9¥$80,031) REFURBISHMENTS) REGIONAL PARKS TOTAL $1,157,941 $131,300 $15,000 $80,338 $1,384,57 $0 $0 $731,816 $1,322,640 $1,355,00 LOCAL PARKS OUTDOOR REFURBISHMENT INCLUDING ATHLETIC AND PICNIC FAC!UT!ES, LINCOLN PARK 1 $133,896 $0 $0 $5,000 $138,89 $0 $127,321 $138,896 $138,89 ROADWAYS,ROADWAYS, RESTROONS, $0 EROSION CONTROL, IRRIGATION CD 1 Total $133 896 $0 $0 $5 000 $138 89 $0 $0 $127321 $13B 896 $138 896 RUNYON CANYON PARK 4 PROPERTY ACQUISITION FOR PARK EXPANS $116,148 $3,450 $0 $0 $119,59 $0 $0 $0 $109 632 $119,59 WATTLES PARK 4 EROSION AND DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS $46,590 $0 $0 $0 $46,59 $0 so $23,295 $46,590 $46,59 IMPROVEMENTS TO ATHLETIC FIELDS, WEST WILSHIRE (Griffith Metro) 4 SWIMMING POOLS, OR RECREATION $76,710 $9,000 $0 $5,903 $91,61 $0 $0 $45,807 $91,613 $91,61 GE_NTER ------~ ~~ -

2009¥10 Assessment Report Attach 4 ¥ RAP Maintenance for A !islxls Page 2 of 3 Proposition K: 2009-10 L.A. For Kids Program Attachment 4 Projected General Fund Impact: RAP Maintenance

Annual Estimate of RAP Maintenance Costs Projected General Fund Impact

PROJECT TITLE co PROJECT SCOPE Other Annual YR 13 YR14 Year15 Year 16 Year17 Salaries Materials Contractor Costs Total 2009~10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14

ROBERT BURNS PARK 4 FACILITY ENHANCEMENTS $13,572 $1,000 $0 $0 $14,57 $0 $0 $7,286 $14,572 $14,57~ CD 4 Total $253 020 $13 450 $0 $5 903 $272 37 $0 $0 $76 388 $262 407 $272 3n ACQUIRE LAND FOR PARKING LOT. POINSETTIA RECREATION 5 BUILDING AND LANDSCAPE $13,572 $1,000 $0 $0 $14,57 $0 $0 $0 $13,358 $14,57~ CENTER REFURBISHMENT CO 5 Total $13,572 $1 000 $0 $0 $14 57 $0 $0 $0 $13 358 $14 57:0 OUTDOOR REFURBISHMENT: BALL BRANFORD RECREATION 6 DIAMONDS, PAVING, IRRIGATION, GYM $110,969 $5,470 $0 $0 $116,43 $0 $0 $58,219 $116,439 $116,43~ CENTER FLOOR

CD 6 Total $110 S69 $5470 $0 $0 $116 43 $0 $0 $58 219 $116439 $116 43~ ST. ANDREWS RECREATION 8 OUTDOOR SPORTS DEVELOPMENT $55,634 $2,000 $0 $0 $57.63< $0 $0 $0 $52,831 $57,36<: CENTER MANCHESTER JR. ARTS REFURBISH, RETROFIT AND CONVERT CITY 8 $0 $0 $0 $0 $ $0 $0 $0 $0 $( CENTER Msion Theatre) BUILDING INTO A JR. ARTS CENTER CD 8 Total $55 63 $2 000 $0 $0 $57 63 $0 $0 $0 $52 831 $57 36.< .CENTRAL RECREATION BUILDING REFURBISHMENT AND PARK 9 $60,435 $0 $0 $0 $60,43 $0 $0 $0 $55,399 $60,43t CENTER DEVELOPMENT CD 9 Total $60 435 $0 $0 $0 $60 43 $0 $0 $0 $55 399 $60 43f RANCHO CIENEGA SPORTS 10 CONSTRUCT FITNESS ANNEX $11_.550 $3,000 $0 $0 $14,55 $0 $0 $0 $0 $( CENTER CD 10 Total $11,550 $3 000 $0 $0 $14 55 $0 $0 $0 $0 $( PACIFIC PALISADES SPORTS FIELD, IRRIGATION, ASPHALT 11 $72,207 $5,000 $0 $0 $77,20 $0 $0 $38,604 $77,207 $77,20j RECREATION CENTER WALKWAY IMPROVEMENTS CD11 Total $72 207 $5 000 $0 $0 $77 20 $0 $0 $38 604 $77 207 $77 20j OUTDOOR PARK DEVELOPMENT, PARKING CHATSWORTH PARK SOUTH 12 $27,144 $6,000 $0 $16,000 $49.14' $0 $0 $0 $45,049 $49,1~ LOT IMPROVEMENTS CD 12 Total $271 $6 000 $0 $16 000 $4914 $0 $0 $0 $45 049 $4914.< HOLLYWOOD RECREATION CONSTRUCT MODERN GYM AND POOL 13 $46,590 $0 $0 $0 $46,59 $0 $0 $0 $27,178 $46,59( CENTER (Griffith Met~) BUILDINGS lASORDA FIELD OF DREAMS IMPROVEMENTS TO ATHLETIC FIELDS, 13 $27,144 $2,500 $0 $9,875 $39,51 $0 $0 $0 $36,226 $39,51! Griffith Metro) FIELDHOUSE, & RESTROOMS CD 13 Total $73 ,., $250 $ $9 87 $8610 $0 $ $0 $63 40 $86 101 OUTDOOR REFURBISHMENT TO INCLUDE ARROYO SECO 14 LIGHTING, NEW PlAY EQUIPMENT lN AREA $13,572 $5,000 $0 $4,240 $22,81 $0 $0 $11,406 $22,812 $22,81: CLOSE TO RESIDENTS, IRRIGATION EAGLE ROCK MONUMENT 14 IRRIGATION AND NEW lANDSCAPING $13,572 $2,000 $0 $0 $15,57 $0 $0 $7 786 $15,572 $15,57: HIGHlAND PARK JR. ARTS REFURBISH, RETROFIT AND CONVERT CITY 14 $13,572 $2,000 $0 so $15,57 $0 so $0 $14,274 $15,57: CENTER BUILDING INTO A JR. ARTS CENTER CD 14 Total $40 716 $9 000 $0 $4 240 $53 95 $0 $0 $19 192 $52 658 $53 95! IMPROVEMENTS TO ATHLETIC FIELDS, POOLS, OR RECREATION CENTER, PARKtNG PECK PARK 15 $116,752 $7,000 $0 $0 $123,75 $0 $0 $0 $113,439 $123,75: LOT, WALKWAYS, IRRIGATION, PICNIC AREAS CO 15 Total $116 752 $7 000 $0 $0 $123 75 $0 $0 $0 $113 439 $123 75: LOCAL PARKS TOTAL $969,628 $54,420 $0 $41,018 $1,065,06 $0 $0 $319,72 $991,085 $1,050,24j

TOTAL ALL PROJECTS $2,486,097 $239,720 $68,500 $121,356 $2,915,67 $0 $12,977 $1,221,394 $2,745,442 $2,871,27! ------·-· ·--- -- . ------·

2009-10 Assessment Report Attach 4 - RAP Maintenance for A list.xls Page 3 of 3 Proposition K: 2009-10 L.A. For-Kids Program Attachment '5 Projected General Fund Impact: RAP Operations

Annual Estimate of RAP Operations Costs Projected General Fund Impact PROJECT TITLE PROJECT SCOPE CD One-Time AN-NUAL YR13 YR14 Year 15 Year 16 Year 17 Salaries Materials Contractor Other Costs Costs TOTAL 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 201.3-14 COMPETITIVE GRANTS I CONSTRUCTION OF A CHILDREN'S REC & PARKS: DOWNEY POOL I 1 WATER PLAY AREA {SPlASH PAD) IN $64,720 $11,754 $0 $0 $76,47 $63,728 S76,474 $76,474 $76.47<1! ENHANCEMENT POOL FACILITY ' • I REC & PARKS: LINCOLN POOL CHILDREN"S WATER PLAY AREA IN 1 $353,363 $69,279 $0 $92,811 $12,000 $527,45 $351,635 $527,45 $527.453 ENHANCEMENT POOL FACILITY ' ' CD 1 Tota $418 082 $61 033 $0 $92 611 $12 000 $603 92 $0 $63 728J $428109 $603 927 $603 92~ DEVELOPMENT OF A PASSIVE PARK ' INCLUDING DEMOLITION OF A DETERIORATED VACANT BUILDING, GRADING, !R.RIGATION, OPEN SPACE REC & PARKS: ORO VISTA 2 WITH PLANTING, DECOMPOSED $0 $0 $0 $( $ $ $ $0 PARK DEVELOPMENT GRANITE WALKING TRAILS, A ' ' ' PERMANENT RESTROOM BUILDING, PICNIC TABLES, CHILDREN'S PLAY AREA, HORSE TRAILER PARKING ., CO2 Tota $0 0 $0 $0 0 • $0 • $0 l:~~·""r•ucrluN~'-:~occE':~cc:~· REC & PARKS: SHELDON (2 WITH LIGHTS), 2 BASEBALL FIELDS " ARLETA (4th cycle) Includes 6 SECURITY LIGHTING PARKING $44,554 $46,500 $22,500 $0 $( $113,5$< $ $0 $47,31 $113,554 $113,554'

reprogrammed funds of $203.878. ~~~~~~T:.ON,DRINKING FOUNTAINS,

INSTALL NEW SYNTHETIC SOCCER REC & PARKS: DELANO PARK- 6 FIELD ON EXISTING TURF FIELD, $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 s $0 $ $ $0 $C SYNTHETIC SOCCER FIELD MODIFY IRRIGATION co 6 Total $445 $46 500 $22 500 $0 $0 $11355 $0 $0 $47 31 $113 55 $113 554 REC & PARKS: ELDORADO 7 ACQUISITION OF OPEN SPACE $0 so so $0 $0 $ $0 $ $0 $0 $0 PARK CD 7Total $0 $0 $0 $0 $ $ $ $0 $0 $0 $0 REFURBISH TURF, REPLACE FENCING!BACK STOP FABRIC, INSTALL REC & PARKS: HARVARD AWNINGS ON DUGOUTS, REPLACE RECREATION CENTER- 8 IRRIGATION/ELECTRICAL PANEL $0 $0 $0 $0 $ s $0 $0 $0 $0 ATHLETIC FIELD ENCLOSURE, REPLACE BLEACHERS & • IMPROVEMENTS PADS, NEW WALKING/JOGGING PATH AROUND PERIMETER C08 Total $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 0 $0 $0 $0 REC & PARKS: BENNY POTTER GREENING, IRRIGATION, PICNIC AREA, • (2nd STREET) PARK- 10 PATH WITH OUTDOOR FITNESS $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $ $0 •o $0 $ $0 IMPROVEMENTS STATIONS co 10 Total $0 $0 so $0 $0 • $0 $0 $0 REPLACE INFIELDS, LEVEURESEED ' ' REC & PARKS: CHATSWORTH OUTFIELD, REPLACE IRRIGATION 12 $0 $0 0 $0 $0 $ $ $0 $0 so PARK NORTH (6th Cycle) SYSTEM, REPLACE FENCE FABRIC, NEVI BLEACHERS, DRINKING FOUNTAINS ' CD 12 Total $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 CONSTRUCTION OF A CHILDREN'S • • • • REC & PARKS: COSTELLO ' 14 WATER PLAY ARF.A-{SPLASH PAD) IN $ $0 $0 $0 $ I so $ $C POOL ENHANCEMENT POOL FACILITY ' • CD 14 Total $0 $ $0 so $0 $ $ $ $ $0 REC & PARKS: EAST DEVELOPMENT OF SOFTBALL. SOCCER • WILMINGTON GREENBELT 15 FIELD, PtAYAREA AND RElATED $68,963 515,000 $0 $1,000 $0 $84;96 $ so $49,562 $84,96:l PARK (Proposed 5th cycle) AMENITIES. ' REC & PARKS: 1 09th STREET AQUATIC UPGRADES, CHILDREN'S PLAY RECREATION CENTER- POOL 15 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 AREA IN POOL FACILITY RENOVATION ' ' • ' CD 15Total $68 963 $15 000 $0 $1 000 $ $8496 $0 $0 $0 $49 562 $84 963 COMPETITIVE GRANTS TOTAL $531,59 $142,53 $22,50 $93,811 $12,00 $802,~ $ $63,72 $475,42 $767,04 $802,444

2009-10 Assessment~ Prepared: April 22, 2009 P~1-ot.a Proposition K: 2009-10 L.A. For Kids Program Attachment 5 Projected General Fund Impact: RAP Operations

Annual E'stimate of RAP Operations Costs Projected General Fund Impact PROJECT TITLE CD PROJECT SCOPE One-Time AtlNUAL YR 13 YR14 Year15 Year 16 Year-17 Salaries Materials Contractor Other Costs Costs TOTAL 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 REGIONAL PARKS IMPLEMENTATION OF MASTER PLAN ANGELS GATE PARK REG IMPROVEMENTS AND PERIMETER $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 s $0 $0 $0 $ FENCING " REFURBISHMENT OF BUilDING AND BANNING MUSEUM (Inflation YR REG GARDEN IMPROVEMENTS (YR 8: $25,143 $15,000 $0 $0 $0 $40,14 $0 $0 $0 $36,79 $40,14: 9- $80,031) BUILDING REFURBISHMENTS) ACQUISITION OF ADDITIONAL LAND, IMPROVEMENTS TO ATHLETIC FIELDS & ELYSIAN PARK REG $ $0 $2,010 $0 $2,01 $0 $0 $1,843 $ $( TRAILS, ROAD REFURBISHMENT, so LIGHTING, RESTROOMS IMPROVEMENTS TO ROADS, TRAILS, WATER SYSTEM, REST ROOMS, PICNIC GRIFFITH PARK REG AREAS, PAVE LIVE STEAMERS PARKING $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $ $0 $0 $0 $0 $( LOT (YR 4: RESTROOM$ FOR SHANE'S INSPIRATION) SOCCER COMPLEX, RV PARK, RANGER STATIONN!SITOR'S CENTER, ROADfTRAIL IMPROVEMENTS, FENCING HANSEN DAM (Valley Region) REG (YR 4&5: SOCCER COMPLEX, YR 7: $206,821 $0 $0 $0 $0 $206,821 $0 so $103,411 $0 $1 PREOEVELOPMENTFOR UNCOM~LETEOSCOPE TO BE DONE IN

YRS8-11 1 LAND ACQUISITION, GREENING ALONG AREA OF ENCINO, SHERMAN OAKS, LOS ANGELES RIVERFRONT REG STUDIO CITY (YR 7: PREDEVELOPMENT, $0 $0 $0 $0 so $0 $0 $0 $0 PARK (Valley Region) • YR 8: DESIGN, ~~S9-11: " CONSTRUCTION BIKEPATH; PARKING; PICNIC AND RESTROOM FACILITIES; SOCCER FIELD SEPULVEDA BASIN REG $0 $0 0 $0 $0 $ $0 so $0 $0 $1 DEVELOPMENT (YR 7: PREDi:VELOPMENTl SEPULVEDA BASIN • HJELTE NEW ATHLETIC FIELDS, LIGHTING, REG $0 $0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1 FIELD PARKING ' REGIONAL PARKS TOTAL 231,964 15,000 0 2,010 0 248,97 0 0 105,253 36,798 40,14: LOCAL PARKS

OUTDOOR REFURBISHMENT INCLUDING ATHLETIC AND PICNIC FACILITIES, LINCOLN PARK 1 $98,666 $11,58 $0 $0 $ $110.25 $ $ $101,065 $110,253 $110.25~ ROADWAYS,ROADWAYS, RESTROONS, EROSION CONTROL, IRRIGATION CD 1 Total $98 666 $11 587 so $0 0 $110 s $0 $0 $101 065 $110253 $110 25: PROPERTY ACQUISITION FOR PARK RUNYON CANYON PARK 4 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $ $ s $ EXPANSION • EROSION AND DRAINAGE " WATILES PARK 4 $0 $0 so $0 $0 $ $ $ $1 IMPROVEMENTS ' /rPROVEMENTS TO ATHLETIC FIELDS, ' WEST WILSHIRE (Griffith Metro) 4 SWIMMING POOLS. OR RECREATION $0 $ $ $ s $1 $1 CENTER ' ' • ' ROBERT BURNS PARK 4 FACILITY ENHANCEMENTS $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $ $ CD 4 Total $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $ $0• '$0 $0 $0' "$1 ACQUIRE LAND FOR PARKING LOT, POINSETI!A RECREATION BUILDING AND LANDSCAPE $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1 CENTER ' REFURBISHMENT • CD 5 TOTA 0 $0 0 $0 $0 $ $0 0 $0 $0 OUTDOOR REFURBISHMENT: BALL BRANFORD RECREATION " 6 DIAMONDS, PAVING, IRRIGATION, GYM $78,453 $0 $0 so $0 $78,45 $0 $0 $39,227 $76,453 $78,45: CENTER FLOOR ...,... .,., .. rn "TnT AI ...... ~" ...... ,.., ...., ....

2009-10 Assessment Report Prepared: April22, 2009 Page 2 of3 Proposition K: 2009~10L.A. For Kids Program Attachment 5 Projected General Fund Impact: RAP Operations

Annual Estimate of RAP Operations Costs Projected General Fund Impact PROJECT SCOPE PROJECT TITLE CD One-Time ANNUAL YR 13 YR14 Year 15 Year 16 Year 17 Salaries Materials Contractor Other Costs Costs TOTAL 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 ST. ANDREWS RECREATION 8 OUTDOOR SPORTS DEVELOPMErH $78,453 $0 $0 $0 $78,45 $0 $0 $0 $71,915 578,45: CENTER ' MANCHESTER JR. ARTS REFURBISH, RETROFIT AND CONVERT 8 $0 $0 so $0 so $ $0 so $0 $0 $1 CENTER (Vision Theater) CITY BUILDING INTO A JR ARTS CENTER 8 ota 78.453 $0 so so so $7845 so so $71 915 78 : CENTRAL RECREATION BUILDING REFURBISHMENT AND PARK 9 $136,679 $0 $0 $0 $0 $136,67 $ $0 $125,289 $136,57l CENTER DEVELOPMENT CD 9 Total $136 679 $0 $0 $0 $0 $136 67. $0 $0 $0 $125 289 $136 67! RANCHO CIENEGA SPORTS 10 CONSTRUCT FITNESS ANNEX $166,382 $6,000 so $0 $0 $172,38 $0 $0 $0 so CENTER CD 10 Total $166 382 $6 000 so $0 $0 $172 38 $0 $0 $0 $0 ",, PACIFIC PALISADES SPORTS FIELD, IRRIGATION, ASPHALT 11 $76,453 $0 $0 $0 $0 $78,45 $0 $0 $39,227 $78.453 $78,45: RECREATION CENTER WALKWAY IMPROVEMENTS C011 Total $78 453 $0 $0 $0 $0 $7845 $0 $39 227 $78 453 $78.45: OUTDOOR PARK DEVELOPMENT, • CHATSWORTH PARK SOUTH 12 $14,851 $0 $0 $0 $14,851 $0 so $0 $12,376 $14,85 PARKING LOT IMPROVEMENTS • CD 12 Total $14 851 $0 $0 $0 $0 $14 851 $0 $0 $0 $12 376 $14 as· HOLL YVVOOD RECREATION CONSTRUCT MODERN GYM AND POOL 13 $14,851 $0 so $0 $0 $14,851 CENTER (Griffith Metro) BUILDINGS

F~~LD 13 I~MPROVEMENTSTO ATHLETIC FIELDS, LASORDA OF DREAMS $14,851 $0 $0 $0 $0 $14,851 so $0 $0 $12,376 $14,85 Gritrtth Metro FIELDHOUSE & RESTROOMS CD 13 Total $29 70 $0 0 $0 $0 $29 70 so so $0 $12 376 $14 85 OUTDOOR REFURBISHMENT TO INCLUDE LIGHTING, NEW PLAY ARROYOSECO 14 $14,851 $0 $0 $0 $0 $14,851 $0 $0 $7,426 $14,851 $14,85 EQUIPMENT IN AREA CLOSE TO RESIDENTS, IRRIGATION EAGLE ROCK MONUMENT 14 IRRIGATION AND NEW LANDSCAPING $0 $0 so $0 $0 $ $0 $0 $0 $0 ,, HIGHLAND PARK JR. ARTS REFURBISH, RETROFIT AND CONVERT 14 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 ,, CENTER CITY BUILDING INTO A JR ARTS CENTER ' CD 14 Total $14 851 $0 $0 $0 $0 $14 851 $0 $0 $7 426 $14 851 $1485 !:MPROVEMENTS TO ATHLETIC FIELDS, PECK PARK 15 POOLS OR RECREATION CENTER, $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $ $0 $0 $0 ,, PARKING LOT • CD 15 Total $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $ $0 $0 $0 $0 ,,

LOCAL PARKS TOTAL $696,491 $17,587 $0 $0 $0 $714,07 $0 $0 $186,9~$503,967 $526,84 I OTAL ALL PROJECTS 1,460,054 175,120 22,500 95,821 12,000 1,765,495 0 63,728 767,620 1,307,807 1,369,431

2009-10 Assessment Report Prepared: April 22, 2009 Page 3 of 3 Attachment 6

PROPOSITION K: 2009-10 L.A. FOR KIDS PROGRAM ADMINISTRATIVE FUNDING ALLOCATIONS FOR YEARS 12 AND 13

Approved Proposed 2008-09 2009-10

$155,000 $192,000 Office of the Assessor - collects Proposition K assessment funds.

Project Manager

Project Manager

Management Analyst I P, LVNOC and Monitoring Services

, LVNOC and Monitoring Services

, LVNOC and Monitoring Services

RFP, LVNOC and Monitoring Services

$420,507

IAccou,ntant II

$136,457

Total Adminisrative Allocations (Fund 43M) $743,080 $748,964

2009-10 Assessment Report Prepared: April 22, 2009 Page 1 of 1 Attachment 7

PROPOSITION K: 2009-10 L.A. FOR KIDS PROGRAM DRAFT CATEGORIES OF ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENTS: 2009-10 A LIST

LIST 1 = PROJECTS FOR WHICH A NOTICE OF EXEMPTION HAS BEEN PREPARED

1 Arroyo Seco - Outdoor Refurbishment 2 Branford Recreation Center- Outdoor Refurbishment 3 Central Recreation- Buildina Refurbishment and Park Development 4 Chatsworth Park South -Outdoor Park Development & ParkinQ Lot Improvement 5 EaQie Rock Monument- lrriQation and New Landscapinq 6 Elysian Park- Improvements to Athletic Fields & Trails 7 Griffith Park- Improvements to Roads Trails Water System 8 Lasorda Field of Dreams 9 Lincoln Park - Outdoor Refurbishment 10 Pacific Palisades Recreation Center 11 Peck Park 12 Poinsettia Recreation Center- Construct Fitness Annex 13 Robert Burns Park- Facility Enhancements 14 St. Andrews Recreation Center - Outdoor Sports Development 15 West Wilshire

LIST 2 = PROJECTS FOR WHICH THIS COUNCIL ACTION IS NOT SUBJECT TO CEQA

1 INane

LIST 3 =PROJECTS PREVIOUSLY EVALUATED AND PROCESSED IN ACCORDANCE WITH CEQA 1 Banninq Museum -Walkway Improvements 2 Los AnQeles Riverfront Park 3 LSTCCommunity Development Corporation 4 Rec & Parks: 1 09th Street Recreation Center - Aauatic Uparades 5 Rec & Parks: Bennv Potter Park 6 Rec & Parks: Costello Pool -Children's Water Play Area in the Pool Facility 7 Rec & Parks: Delano Park- Install New Synthetic Soccer Field Modify lrriqation 8 Rec & Parks: Downey Pool -Children's Water Play Area in the Pool Facility 9 Rec & Parks: East Wilminaton Greenbelt Park 10 Rec & Parks: Hardvard Recreation Center 11 Rec & Parks: Lincoln Pool 12 Rec & Parks: Oro Vista Park Development - Development of a Passive Park 13 Sepulveda Basin Sport Complex 14 Wattles Park- Erosion and Drainaqe Improvements

LIST 4 =PROJECTS FOR WHICH A NEGATIVE DECLARATION OR MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION HAS BEEN PREPARED AND REQUIRE COUNCIL ACTION 1 INane

LIST 5 =PROJECTS FOR WHICH AN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT, NEGATIVE DECLARATION OR MITIGATED NEGATIVE DELARATION IS BEING PREPARED 1 AnQels Gate Park - Implementation of Master Plan Improvements 2 Hansen Dam Phase II - Ranqer Station 3 Hiqhland Park Jr. Arts Center- Refurbish Retrofit and Convert 4 Hollywood Recreation Center 5 Sepulveda Basin - Hielte Field

2009~ 10 Assessment Report Prepared: April 22, 2009 Page 1 of 1 Attachment 8

PROPOSITION K: L.A. FOR KIDS PROGRAM 2009-09 MAINTENANCE AWARD RECOMMENDATIONS

Recommended No. Maintenance Applicant . Project Scope CD Award

.·

1 All Peoples Christian Center Gym Renovation 9 $ 47,143 2 Artshare Los Anaeles Renovate art studio 9 $ 11,939 3 Avalon Gardens Communitv Center 9 $ 23,367 League-size basketball court; weight room; 4 Barrio Action Youth and Family Center 14 $ 10,311 and dance studio 5 Bovs & Girls Club of San Fernando Vallev Kitchen/restroom renovation 7 $ 92,624 Boys and Girls Club of San Pedro - Satellite 6 Satellite Clubhouse at the Port of Los Angeles 15 $ 6,394 Clubhouse 7 Boys and Girls Club of Harbor City Full facility rehabilitation/renovation 15 $ 9,132 Renovation of building into community/youth 8 Bresee Community Center 13 $ 2,482 center. California State University, Northridge (CSUN) 9 Install moveable floor pool for disabled youth 12 $ 9,924 Center of Achievement 10 El Centro Del Pueblo Youth Recreation Center 13 $ 5,023 11 Inner Citv Arts Facilitv exoansion 1 ,8,9 $ 5,175 Therapeutic/Special Needs Center Complete 12 Jeffrey Foundation 10 $ 29,522 renovation of buildina 13 Jeffrev Foundation Children Center Renovation and Exoansion 10 $ 20,186 New A/C; roof repair; plumbing, lighting and 14 Plaza de Ia Raza floor upgrade; safety doors; dance mirrors & 1 $ 50,000 room dividers 15 Bishop Mora Salesian High School Synthetic Turf Athletic Field 14 $ 85,871 Temple Gateway Center-renovation and 16 Search to Involve Pilipino Americans (SIP A) 13 $ 16,271 expansion of youth center Renovation of building for use as child care 17 Testimonial Community Love Center 8 $ 40,328 facility 18 Therapeutic Livina Centers for the Blind Build enclosure over pool 3 $ 2,507 19 Venice Community Housing Corp (Venice Build) Renovate child care facility 11 $ 4,639 20 Venice Hope Park Outdoor improvements and lighting 9 $ 17,701 21 Westside Child Care Center Build child care facilitY 11 $ 15,657 22 White Memorial Special Needs Program Facility Renovation of Rainbow Children's Center 14 $ 4,830 Construction of glass blowing, silk screening 23 WLCAC Mudtown Studios 15 $ 47,139 and ceramics studios 24 YMCA - East Valley Build roller hockey rink and lights 4 $ 3,792 25 YMCA - North Vallev ConstruCt new avm 12 $ 50,195 .. Subtotal - Private Non-profits $ 612152 26 LAUSD: Birmingham SHS Stadium lights 12 $ 18,600 27 LAUSD: Crenshaw SHS Synthetic field & track improvements 8 $ 13,264 28 LAUSD: Davton Heiahts ES Plavaround with restroom facilities 13 $ 2,307 29 LAUSD: El Camino SHS Stadium lights 3 $ 8,600 30 LAUSD: Fairfax SHS Athletic field lighting 5 $ 8,600 31 LAUSD: Hale JHS Gym improvements 3 $ 19,836 LAUSD: Los Angeles Center for Enriched Build a new multipurpose building (gym and 32 10 $ 3,709 Studies (LACES) natatorium) 33 LAUSD: Lincoln SHS Stadium lights 1 $ 4,300 34 LAUSD: Patrick Henrv JHS Construct fitness center 12 $ 21,824 35 LAUSD: Reseda SHS Renovate weight room and obstacle course 3 $ 23,036 36 LAUSD: San Pedro SHS Build sports/recreational complex 15 $ 13,474

2009~ 10 Assessment Report Prepared: April22, 2009 Page 1 of2 Attachment 8

PROPOSITION K: L.A. FOR KIDS PROGRAM 2009-09 MAINTENANCE AWARD RECOMMENDATIONS

Recommended Maintenance Applicant Project Scope CD Award

39 Zoo: Children's Discovery Center

40 CAD. Canoga Park Youth Center

41 CAD • Sun Valley Junior Arts

PROPOSED MAINTENANCE FUNDING SOURCES Total2008-09 Maintenance Funding $ 2,372,053 Prior-Year Unspent Maintenance Funds (Fiscal Years 2004-05 and 2005-06) $ 1,018,927 Total Funding Sources $ 3,390,980

2009-10 Assessment Report Prepared: April22, 2009 Page 2 of 2 Attachment 9

ENGINEER'S REPORT

CITY OF LOS ANGELES ./ LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING DISTRICT~~. 96c I (Voters Approved Proposition K: L.A. fCJ~~\dsJ'rogram) ·•·

FOR

Fiscal Year 2009~ldAssessm~~t<'· ' ,,, ,,•' .·, (FundiJ,~g Year

Council File Number: ---;""------

Item No.------

Council Agenda Dated:------FY 2009-10 Engineer's Report for City of Los Angeles Landscaping and Lighting District No. 96-1

LA for Kids Program Organizational Chart

Antonio R. Villaraigosa Mayor

; •/ :>.·<•·:.:·. ,.;::

CD 1 Ed Reyes CD 9 Jan Perry '-:>>"· CD2 Wendy Greuel::: db 10:'' Herb J. Wesson, Jr. CD3 Dennis P .;Zine c8ri•, Bill Rosendahl I CD4 Tom LaBonge CD 12 · . Greig Smith City Council I CDS Jack Weiss.·. CD 13 · Eric. Garcetti [. CD6 Tony Carde.ias .•.·· CD 14 J~se Hl!izar :·•;; ·.· ..· .. ; .,::::, .. 1··•·.> CD7 Richard Marcon · CD 15 Janice Halm CDS Bemard Parks I> \.,_ ...... ·· ••

LA for Kids ---.,.. Mayp~'$'ggi.~~· Steering , Cit)/AdminisHative Officer (Chair) Committee '---· ', ) ). _ Chief Legislative Analyst { ·•·· ex-officio, non-voting members ······.. \/L·I }•·--••········. , >.... ·.-··-· . : ·•.•.,.···ii;; 2>' ... L .• Dept. of Dept. of Bureau of Recreation and Cultural Affairs Engineering Parks

·...... •.•..••••....•. ;... _:··

...... ,················------·-·······-. Regional .. i • Local Volunteer.': • Local Volunteer •. : Local Volunteer Volunteer ..· 'I : Neighborhood : :·: ; Neighborhood : :· Neighborhood I Specified/ Neighborhood ; : Competitive ; Oversight :; :· ·. . Oversight : : Oversight Oversight ; ; l Grant Projects 1 ; Committees : : ; : ; Committees • ; Committees ... ~~~~itt~~~- .. : • l...... J ... ~ ~ _: : : : : : : : : :: .! j ~ . . : ...... : .. . . ' .. . ' . . ' . . ' . . ' . '

Attach 9- Draft 2009-10 Engineers Report. doc 4/3/09 1 FY 2009-10 Engineer's Report for City of Los Angeles Landscaping and Lighting District No. 96-1

Table of Contents LA for Kids Program Organization Chart

PART A INTRODUCTION AND DEFINITIONS ...... I A. I Five Parts of This Report: ...... 2 A.2 Definitions ...... 2 A.3 Benefit Assessment and Collections ...... 3 A.4 LA .for Kids Program Organization ...... 4 A.5 The Annual and Multi-Year Plans Process ...... 8 A. 6 Competitive Grant Process ...... _.,::·;:_:;~:~~~:.:::_ .... ~:'>;;:~.~-·>":::;:;-.' ...... 8 A. 7 Administration ofContracts with Competitive Grant Awardees._~::-;-:·:::::.::::· ..... :;:}:;::;·;:.:·...... 12 PART B PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THKPROPOSErifMPROVEMENTS ...... :;.; •...... ::L...... :::(:.;.-;, ...... ;•.... 13 B. I Five-Year Plan ...... • .... ;,,,...... X.

TEXT OF PROPOSJTIO~~ ATTACHMENT 1: PROPOSITION K: FINAL FIVE YEAR PLAN FOR YEARS 13-17 ATTACHMENT 2: PROPOSITION K: 2009-10 LIST A ATTACHMENT 3: PROPOSITION K: 2009-10 LIST B ATTACHMENT 4: PROPOSITION K: 2009-10 LIST C ATTACHMENT 5: PROPOSITION K: 2009-10 POTENTIAL MAINTENANCE FUNDING LIST ATTACHMENT 6: CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT DOCUMENTS

Attach 9- Draft 2009-10 Engineers Report.doc 4/3/09 ii ENGINEER'S REPORT CITY OF LOS ANGELES LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING DISTRICT NO. 96-1 (Voters Approved Proposition K: L.A. for Kids Program)

PART A INTRODUCTION AND DEFINITIONS

On May 14, 1996, the Los Angeles City Council (the "Cotmcihadopted an Ordinance of Intention, subject to voters' approval, to order the formation assessment district, "City of Los Angeles Landscaping and Lighting Di~tti6tf@(). 96c I" in accof&ance with the provisions of the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, Partipmiyisi~~·'f~q{the Streets and Highways Code. The measure was placed on the November 5}@96b~lot~s Prop.g~{tf~n K.

On November 5, 1996, voters in the Ci~~fLos Angelei'I~~;~ved Proposition K, which authorizes the formation oftheQtt}roiLosAngeles Lai1,lscaping and Lighting District No. 96-1 and approves the levy and cqJ!e~t~~n of an ann~~ ~ssessment~~~:i5 million within the District for a period of thirty years. ·.• ·.Xi,.... , The District will•J?rgyide funding foi:the acquisition, development, improvements, restoration and maintenance of p~;~~C,'~r.en sp.a§€~, recreation and community facilities throughout the District. <;'" "" '." Over the 30 year ftmdirig~~tldd, a total of $442.5 million is designated for capital projects in 1996 ·dollars. Of this amount, •~i98.85 million is for projects that were specified in the measure, and $143.65 million is for competitive grants. Council must pass an ordinance by June 30th each year levying the assessment for the ensuing Fiscal Year. This Repmi is prepared in compliance with the requirements of Article 4 of Chapter 1 of the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, Part 2 of Division 15 of the California Streets and Highways Code.

Attach 9- Draft 2009-10 Engineers Report. doc 4/3/09 Page 1 A.l Five Parts of This Report:

PART A. INTRODUCTION AND DEFINITIONS PART B. PLANS AND SPEC/FICA TIONS FOR THE PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS A general description of the proposed Improvements for the 2009-10 Fiscal Year including the general nature, location, and extent of the Improvements. PART C. ESTIMATE OF THE COSTS OF THE IMPROVEMENTS An estimate of the cost of the proposed Improvements and of any proposed incidental expenses to be incurred in connection with the Improvements. · PART D. BOUNDARIES OF DISTRICT AND ASSES$NMflr DlAGRAM A reduced scale copy of the assessment diagram is i!}cluded ..· PART E. BENEFIT ASSESSMENT FORMULA ANDivTE.THbD A statement of the method by which the benefit to each;~i·~~erty is determi~~~~1\d explained.

A.2 Definitions As used in this Report, the following te1ms have the''i~~i~af~~~fueanings: "Assessment" means the levy to be collect<;:d wlthin th~ City upon real property on the basis of special benefits received rather than b)' ad valorell1. tax. . "Assessment District" or "District" m~@g "City of Los)\rigeles Landscaping and Lighting District 96-1 ", also !mown f!S.'' Prop6Siti:·,,;,------:<:.::::::.::.~:;:;:;::::- \ ·-:;.;::_:>>:_->~">';-;-- "Benefit Point"·6r "BP" meai\s~·~t useci

"City Engineer" meai1s.the Los Angeles City Engineer. "Code" means the StJ·e~ts a!ld Ht~hways Code of California. . "Land Use Code" mea~§ih: Code that the Los Angeles County Assessor assigns to each parcel based on the zoning and the use or improvement on the parcel. "LVNOCs" means the Local Volunteer Neighborhood Oversight Committees. "Measure" or "Proposition" means the Proposition K or the Referendum Ordinance K that was approved by the City voters on November 5, 1996. "RVNOCs" means the Valley, Central, and Southern Regional Volunteer Neighborhood Oversight Committees. "Steering Committee" means the Proposition K L.A. for Kids Program Steering Committee.

Attach 9- Draft 2009-10 Engineers Report. doc 4/3/09 Page 2 A.3 Benefit Assessment and Collections

A.3.1 Benefit Assessment Governing Laws

Because the assessments proposed have received approval of a majority of the voters prior to the passage of Proposition 218, they are exempt from the procedures and approval process set forth in Section 4 of Proposition 218, but the assessment proceedings are required to follow the provisions of the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972.

The Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972 provides frir. assess~~~~~ tor park installation, improvement, landscaping, and maintenance costs against i~;; ~enefited pf6f~rti~s within the assessment district. The Act states that:

"The net amount to be assessed upon lands wft{Jin an assessfnetzt .district may be apportioned by any formula or method which .ti:ttrly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels in proportionJo the es(irHrf.(fd benefits to be received by each such lot or parcel fi·om the imprqverrMits. ·

The determination ofwhether o~ I)Ot fi lot or pa~8J{.ryi{lhenefit fi'om the improvements shall be made pursuant to thefff;pt~~ement Actoj/911 (Division 7 commencing with Section 5000 ofthe/Streets and Hig}rway Code)." The application 9i;:•thii ~eth~J ;~th~ assess~~hi ofthe various lots or parcels is shown in detail in PartE- Benefi-i~ssessment Formul1~~d Method. <' ':,' ::.- -~ A.3.2 ·· Ais~s~went Collection$ The amounts t()•:;€~i~~essed for th~ expense of such acquisition, development, improvements, restoration and mal~f~~

All laws providing for the collection and enforcement of County taxes will be applied to the collection and enforcement of the assessments. All assessments collected will be disbursed and expended for maintenance, operation, improvements, land acquisition and service of the district.

Attach 9- Draft 2009-10 Engineers Report. doc 4/3/09 Page 3 A.3.3 Public Properties Properties owned by public agencies such as the cities, the County, the State or the federal government will not be assessed, except when such property is not devoted to a public use. Rights-of­ way owned by utilities and railroad operating rights-of-way are also exempt from assessment.

A.4 LA for Kids Program Organization

A.4.1 LA for Kids Steering Committee

SECTION 9 of the Proposition K Referendum Ordinance The expenditure ofassessmentfimds and the overallmi:trtag~?ment o/theprogram projects, which together shall be known as the L.A. FQ]iKIDS Program, shall be administered by the City Council or by a City entity designated by the' City Council by ordinance, which shall report to the City Councilqnnually on the status of the L.A. FOR KIDS Program and shall provide forptib(ir,: distribution of the annual report. ·· ·· ···

Based on this Section, the Council adopted an o£JinanceL~~~ilL!, 1997, designating an entity to administer the expenditure of assessment n!rids and pf .··<·.·>-"/".':,.-. ', Le;i~l~fi've--·.-.·-' Administrative Offi~er. Als~ a@i~nilted ~~ i;~ci.Jfficio, non-voting members of the Steering Committee ..

The Steering Committee shall have the following duties and responsibilities and such others as the City Council may add:

Attach 9- Draft 2009-10 Engineers Report. doc 4/3/09 Page 4 (a) Administer the expenditure of assessment funds and be responsible for the overall management of the L.A. FOR KIDS Program; (b) Submit an annual plan of projects to Council for approval, which will include, but not be limited to, identification of the general nature, location, and extent of acquisition and improvements for all projects to be funded in the year and priorities for the long-term; (c) Submit recommendations on the composition of Volunteer Neighborhood Oversight Committees for projects in Regional Parks; (d) Develop financing alternatives; (e) Submit an annual report to the City Council on the status oftheL. A. FOR KIDS Program and provide for public distribution of the annual report; ariel · · (f) Oversee the following activities: (1) Monitoring of the status of Projects, costs and s<;hed~les of Pt~positioll K funded projects in the participating City departments and c()j11nlissions; · ·•··········••·•········· (2) Preparation of the annual City Engineer asfi~ssrrl~ilt••report by. ~he Bureau of Engineering; and . \: > ..... (3) Development of computer tapes to be. simt to tl:le CountyA$s~ssor each year by the Information Technology Agency.

The Steering Committee will administer all Trust qt Speci~l ~unds in which Proposition K assessment funds are deposited. StaffiligJor the work6ftfi~§~eering Committee will be provided by the City Administrativ~ Qffi<;er cd~6T.

:.::::::>>' ·<;;1:·{~_:(: _}:;>' A.4.2 Vo!t,ilfteer Neighborhoorl.'(Jversight Committees

that participation and oversight would be vital to the success of Propositl;~kenv:isioned' ::.·,_---_ - cornJ~ty.< -, ·;: ---- :_-<·'-> '_':-:' the L.A. for Kids Program. Section 10 of the measure states,

"The City Coun;;Fghdi/};;tablish Volunteer Neighborhood Oversight Committees in various areas of the Ci{y to advise the City on setting priorities for when projects will be done, advise on the·d~sign ofprojects and prepare annual reports to the City Council on the status ofprojects. "

Two tiers of Volunteer Neighborhood Oversight Committees have been approved:

I. Regional Committees to advise the L.A. for Kids Steering Committee on when projects will be done. 2. Local Committees to advise on the design of projects and to prepare annual reports to City Council on the status of the projects.

Attach 9- Draft 2009-10 Engineers Report. doc 4/3/09 Page 5 A.4.3 Regional Volunteer Neighborhood Oversight Committees (RVNOCs) The City Council has established three regional committees: Valley, Central, and Southern regions. It is important that community members on the Regional committees have a regional perspective when advising on priorities. The Regional Volunteer Neighborhood Oversight Committees have the following key elements:

+ There are 3 Regional Committees with approximately 10 members each; + The members are appointees of Council offices. Each Council Office has 2 appointees who live, operate a business, or own property within their Coun<;it.Blstrkt;. > + The CAO is responsible for coordinating and convening thg Region~{Cbmmittees. + Boundmies of the three regions closely follow Council Qistrict b()ti~d~ti~~and the numbers of RVNOC committee members in each Region me compo~~·~ ilsfollows: ·· · ·· Composition of Regional Volunteer Neighborho~~ dversight Co~;;{~~fees ,, '/'>·-,',

Valley Regional Volunteer Central Regional Soutli~rf\Regional Neighborhood Oversight Volunteer Neighbor~Qod Volunfe~l' ~eighborhood Committee Oversight Committee OversightCommittee I> C02= 2 members CD 1 = 2,.rnei1Jbers .COB= 2 members CD3= 2 members CD 4 = ; 2 mefl1bers CD9 = 2 members CD5= 1 member CD~.= • 1 member i CD 10 = 2 members CD6= 2 members cp>j~·~c ... 1 member CD 11 = 1 member CD7 = z.llJ~mB~rs·'";. .co 13;,• >. 2 members CD 15 = 2 members

CD 12 = 2mem6E!rg. ', ,,CD ____ ; 14 = •;.;. .• zr:nembers TOTAL:11 members "T'QTAL =10inembers TOTAL =9 members

A.4.4 · •Lo~'atT{olunteer Neighb~rhood Oversight Committees (L VNOCs)

A4.4.1 LVNOCs tdfisb~Cified Projects The City Council took ~~ti~)t0hApril4, 1997, to create Local Volunteer Neighborhood Oversight Committees at each park kh~ Junior Arts Center upon Council approval of each project as part of the annual plan. The Depmtments of Recreation and Pmks and Cultural Affairs me instructed to coordinate and to convene the Local Committees for the projects within their respective areas of responsibilities. These Departments appoint members to these Local Committees. Before selecting the membership to serve on the Local Volunteer Neighborhood Oversight Committees, the Departments me instructed to confer with the relevant Council Offices for

Attach 9- Draft 2009-10 Engineers Report.doc 4/3/09 Page 6 recommendation of potential appointees from key stakeholder groups to ensure that, to the extent feasible, the entire community is represented in the process.

A.4.4.2 LVNOCs for Competitive Grant Projects

The Council approved the formation of one Local Volunteer Neighborhood Oversight Committee in each Council District for those projects awarded funds through the competitive grant process, upon Council approval of each project as part of the annual plan. As noted in the chart below, these Committees are comprised of seven voting members and thre~.eX. offibio meh:tbers. Five of the seven '·'- ,', ,',','"-/· ' ,-_; .-.- voting members are appointed by each Council Office (four neighborhoO:cl. representatives and one youth representative). The five Council Office appointees h~ye t()•li~e, o~er~tea bu~iness, or own property within the Council District.

The Department of Recreation and Parks has the respQnsibility of·fdrtnhtg its own LVNOCs for competitive grants awarded to the Department.

These LVNOCs are responsible for monitori)1g tJi{prog~ess ofJuniled projects and for preparation of annual status reports to City Council.

.;<;:---·,'>, :--;<<-"<•'> "" ' • Type of Type of i't'epl:~~~ntative ·•.•x• I Appointed By Number of Members· • <<<' -;:: :-, Members Voting\ N eighborhooct < Council Member 4

M em.. t-t•·er~. Representativ~~ . Youth Repres~htative Council Member 1 }.Jeighborhqqd Departments of Recreation and 2 · ReRresel!tatives Parks, Cultural Affairs, or ;'{: BOE for Competitive Projects .<·,,·<;8< >::;; <;;:~- under BOE purview TQTAL 7 Ex officio Council Staff Council Member 1 Members Representative Mayor's Representative Mayor 1 Bureau of Engineering Bureau of Engineering 1 Staff

Attach 9- Draft 2009-10 Engineers Report.doc 4/3/09 Page 7 A.S The Annual and Multi-Year Plans Process

1. Departmental Annual and Multi-year Plans Each year, the City Engineer submits a list of projects for the annual and multi-year plans to the L.A. for Kids Steering Committee. Based on department and Council Office input, the Steering Committee submits a draft to the RVNOCs each January.

2. The Regional Volunteer Neighborhood Oversight Committees Review The Regional Volunteer Neighborhood Oversight Coffilnittees. will each review the plan and submit their recommendations to the L.A. for Ki4~ ~tee;ing 8o~111ittee.

3. The L.A. for Kids Steering Committee Review The L.A. for Kids Steering Committee then reviewsflleRVNOC recbnffii~ridations and ',','''', ',' '',',''' submits its recommendations to Council.

4. City Council Review and Approval Council reviews and adopts annual and multi-ye~~ pJitns. In the dse of competitive grants, no contract can be awarded until fina1Co~i1cil appr~J~i'iltthe project as part of an annual plan and funds are available.

A.6 Competitive .Qr~.pt .~;~~~ss The Commissio~ f~r ~~ild;~~,·~~outh ~~X Their Families was designated by Ordinance to administer the competitive grant p1·~cess. The City of Los Angeles retains the right to amend this ordinance arfd designate a differer\fitgency to administer that process. At its meeting of May 15, 2003, the L.A. fQk\Kids SteeringEommittee recommended that responsibility for the competitive grant process be tr~~~f~freq[id: the Commission to the City Engineer. The recommendation was approved by Cotmcil File 03-0515-S2), and a new Ordinance was adopted, therefore, the c¢6t~~~il.· Commission for Children, Youth and Their Families is no longer directly involved in the Proposition K L.A. for Kids Program.

The Proposition K measure established eight categories of competitive projects and limited the amount of funds that can be expended in these categories. Grants are available in the following 8 categories, subject to availability of funding in each category:

Attach 9- Draft 2009-10 Engineers Report doc 4/3/09 Page 8 1. Regional Recreation/Educational Facilities 2. Neighborhood At-Risk Youth Recreation Facilities 3. Youth Schools/Recreation Projects 4. Aquatic Upgrades 5. Athletic Fields 6. Lighting at Athletic Fields 7. Urban Greening 8. Acquisition of Parks and Natural Lands

A.6.1 2008-2010 The 6TH BIENNIAL COMPETITIVE GRANT PROCESS

The following is a brief review of the 2008-2010 Competitiv~Qr!llltproject selecti()r:pt~cess: On May 2, 2007, the City Council instructed the Bureau of Engineering (BOE) to conduct a competitive process for the two-year funding cycle from)uly 1, 2008 1'6 June 30, 2010, for the distribution of Proposition K funds. A total of abouf$1i~f~·fuillion was ~Aticipated to be available.

During the period of May 22 through Juri~ 5, 2~07, t~e Bur(U of Engineering, with assistance from various City departments, con.clucted four (4)Techhical Assistance Seminars (TAS) in various areas of the Gity,.t6ihform potentiai\lpplicants of the RFP requirements.

As instructedB~:~ouncil, on May2;dQ07, BO~;:sued a Request for Proposals for the Proposition K competftlVe grant process. Prop~~~ls were due on July 12, 2007. The BOE received 41 proposals fro~ ::~j~ cdepartments, ~bn-profit agencies and other public agencies for a total of approximately $ 26rnillions in fuhding requests. , .•..••••.•••.••...... ,,·.

BOE reviewed the project~ for responsiveness and conducted initial site visits. Of the 41 proposals submitted, 2 were deemed ineligible by the Bureau of Engineer and/or the L.A. for Kids Steering Committee as non-responsive. Therefore, total funding requested declined to approximately $ 25 millions.

Attach 9- Draft 2009-10 Engineers Report doc 4/3/09 Page 9 On September 11 and September 12, 2007, BOE convened scoring panels consisting individuals from various City Departments and outside experts with the appropriate expertise and professional experience to score proposals and used the following approved criteria as detailed in the RFP for scoring and selection:

1 2008-2010 6 h Biennial Cycle Competitive Grant Evaluation Criteria

CRITERIA MAXIMUM ' POINTS )'>' . I Project Description and Management <. (25 points) >, '·,',' 2 Fiscal And Budgetary Review <(2~,points) •••••• •• •••• 3 Project Readiness ··•, X < (i~~9l)ttS) 4 Service Capability . ,, .·•· c2o J;t:lirirs) 5 8 Bonus Point Criteria* < (lOpoints) MAXIMUM POINTS POSSIBLE • I/ , 100 '(

*Bonus Point Criteria: .

1) Project includes an atcri~J<.YOllt11 t~!~~~~Jl.t, either by including training and employment of at­ risk youth to inl])I~~~~t~11~~}gj~6tor by;fd~raplg facilities to serve at-risk youth; 2) Project serv6s an area without sitrtrlifr servicesor facilities; 3) Project p6rmits expansion of an e~t~blished, successful program to serve a larger population or to provide aniricre.ase in services;' 4) Project demons~~i~~~()llliflUnity support; \ :;:~:;: ,-~':;:\_: ·:~ <. ~.::}' ' 5) Project demonstrates higWcost-effectiveness;

.6) Project demonstrates re~diness; 7) Project sustainability; and/or 8) Proposer's attendance at one Technical Assistance Seminar.

Also, on September 27,2007, the L.A. For Kids Steering Committee directed the BOE to prepare a list of projects from the pool of eligible applicants for preliminary funding consideration by the

Attach 9- Draft 2009-10 Engineers Report. doc 4/3/09 Page 10 RVNOCs. Factors to be considered for inclusion on this list included: funding category, rating panel's score, region, location of projects, council district, project readiness, and award history of project and the Steering Committee directed the BOE to transmit 6th cycle preliminary funding recommendations back to the Steering Committee.

On September 27, 2007, BOE presented a preliminary funding recommendations report to the Steering Committee. Table 1 below provides a breakdown of recommended projects by RVNOC Region.

Table 1: City Engill~er .• • .·.· 1 6 h Cycle Competitive Grant Preliminary FIJriqing Recomni~l)dations .·· ... · •••• Region Number of Projects 'J>?hposition K Funding >.:::...... ' ••••••• Southern 7 ...... ••••• ••••••••••••• $:3,419,080 Central 6• • $3,768,000 Valley ... 6 .·. ·. ••••••••••• $3,814,000 $11,001,080 Total •••••••• / '··..············ .. · 19 ...... ·.··•··

The L.A. for Kids Steeri\ig Corru:nittee p~<'lYi4ed eligible 6th cycle Proposition K applicants with opportunities toafp~~l their st~iJ$()~t)le B0~~$1-~tommended list at its meeting on September 27, 2007.

<;::<:·::::::;:~;:,_.. :, On October I 0, 2007;,the Steering. Committee heard final appeals and approved a recommended list of 21 projects t~filing $J2,b05,080. The recommended proposals were forwarded to the ' >- ··:_· .__ :·.-._->_:-· Regional Volunteer Neighborhood Oversight Committees (RVNOCs).

The RVNOCs reviewed the recommended projects and assigned priorities. The RVNOC recommendations were based on the divergent needs in the City, the need to balance Proposition K funding by region, and the availability of funds within specific Proposition K grant categories. The RVNOCs then forwarded their recommendations to the L.A. for Kids Steering Committee. The

Attach 9- Draft 2009-10 Engineers Report. doc 4/3/09 Page 11 Steering Committee then finalize and forward their recommendations to the City Council for final approval.

The L.A. for Kids Steering Committee held meetings to consider the RVNOC recommendations and to hear public testimony on, and appeals of, the RVNOC recommendations. Some adjustments were made to the RVNOC recommendations based on competing regional demands for funding in Propositions K grant categories with limited capacity. In next fe)¥)imll.fus, the Steering Committee will forward a final recommended list and proposed Prop6sit;on K Fi~e,Year Plan to the City Council for approval to ensure a balanced distribution ofpnijects througho~tthe City. The final L. A. for Kids Steering Committee/RVNOC recommendations are.b~low as Table :i. < ···••• Table 2: Steering Committeetk\INOC 1 6 h Cycle Competitive Grant Prelimi11ary Funding(~~qprninendations

•··.···.·· Region Number of Projects v Proposition K Funding

••• .·· . ••••••• .· ... Southern $3,819,410 •..•. •.·••·••••• 8 •••• Central •• • ••••••• 8 $3,819,410 \. .>...... ·... ······· Valley >. 8 $3,819,411 TotaL •>•······.· .. $11,458,231 ··>········~·········· 24 A.7 AclW~:istration J~@htract~with Competitive Grant Awardees There are s~~~~~~ components tolthe contracts with competitive grant awardees: design, construction, an~ ie~<;es/rnaintegilnce. With the transfer of the CCYF competitive grant process to the Bureau of Engill~~tlrig;•theCity Engineer now administers all components of the contracts . .Grants awarded to the De~~ent of Recreation and Parks, or any other City agency, are not part of this contracting process. Instead, City departments are responsible for conducting their own project design, construction, and maintenance as required. Nonetheless, in March 2002, the Council designated the City Engineer to be the Program Manager to oversee project and construction management for all Department of Recreation and Parks Proposition K projects.

Attach 9- Draft 2009-10 Engineers Report.doc 4/3/09 Page 12 PART B PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS

B.l Five-Year Plan While a five-year plan is not a requirement of Proposition K,itis~im#~~~tplanning tool to help City departments know when to begin the project development process. The~i~also helps to ensure that funds are distributed equitably citywide over the life of ~g)4easure. A pi~ is ~!so necessary because projects must comply with the Califoruia Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) prior to being approved for funding in a particular Fiscal Year. The plail includes proj6~t~{iiaf~ere specified in the Measure and projects that were awarded fundin~ in prior 6~1llpetiti,ve grant cycles. The Steering Committee will submit a new five-year plan toCd~hcil eath ye~to/eflect any changes in projects or needs. The FIVE-YEAR PLAN specifies in \f~f~lth0 se acquisiti6~s,~d improvements that are to be funded by the District. LISTA(Attkd~eiit2) of Ordering Confirmation, Levy and Collection of Annual Assessment or ~s·'j'k4l!ired by la:o/f~ Categorical Exemption, Environmental Impact Report, or '------" Negative Declarationha~~b~eJ:loiis being prepared and a Notice of Determination has been or will be .filed when applicable. Lidt~ (Attachment 3) of the Plan includes specified and competitive projects in years 14, 15, 16 and 17 (i.e. 2010-11 through 2013-14) that may be substituted for projects in LIST A during the Fiscal Year in the event it is determined by the City Council that any project in LIST A will not be implemented in the 2009-10 Fiscal Year. LIST C (Attachment 4) contains the competitive grant projects on the alternate list recommended by the Regional Volunteer Neighborhood Oversight Committees and approved by the Council. Similar to LIST B, these projects will be available to substitute for any projects on LIST A that cannot be implemented during the Fiscal Year. The

Attach 9- Draft 2009-10 Engineers Report. doc 4/3/09 Page 13 substituting of the projects on LIST A with projects on LIST B or LIST C will not change the benefit analysis of the special benefit received by the assessed parcels in the City. Compliance with CEQA must be completed for projects in LIST B and LIST C prior to City Council approving in the 2009-10 fiscal year, the substitution of any of these projects for projects in LIST A.

B.2 FY 2009-10 Improvement Project List Review Process

B.2.1 The Regional Volunteer Neighborhood Ovefl!ftg/it GrJm!fiittees Meetings

The Regional Volunteer Neighborhood Oversight Committees' meetl~~~'a,re publicly noticed and are staffed by City departments. For the 2009-10 assess~entytifu., the 2()1lnnit:tees reviewed the projects specified in the measure and those proposed in the dotrij"l~titive procesk';~commendations. ·. The Committees proposed the projects that should be done over t@n!)xt fiv"' years, based on tours of the competitive grant projects, and their lmowl~d~~)·\jf comm~tY~~~ds. The RVNOCs also assigned priority levels to each project to h~lp the §t~i#ng Co~ittee determine when the •'-,, '' ·-,· ·-----

:·;::_::_:-:<>' ->_:.: B.2.2 The L.A. for Kids Steer{tj~Committeek~~~~w Process After receiving the} ie:2qilimendations of >the Regional Volunteer Neighborhood Oversight Committees, the£.~. for Kid{ Ste~#\ng c()IIlillMge conducted public hearings on competitive grant and specif\£4projects to be inc!~d@cl)n the n~e-year plan. The final five-year plan recommended by the St~~{f~~~'c:;onnnittee was i)

ATTACHMENT I is titled: "PROPOSITION K: FINAL FIVE YEAR PLAN FOR YEARS 13-17''. ATTACHMENT 2 is titled: "PROPOSITION K: 2009-10 LIST A". ATTACHMENT 3 is titled: "PROPOSITION K: 2009-10 LIST B ". ATTACHMENT 4 is titled: "PROPOSITION K: 2009-10 LIST C". ATTACHMENT 5 is titled: "PROPOSITION K: 2009-10 POTENTIAL MAINTENANCE PROJECTS".

Attach 9- Draft 2009-10 Engineers Reportdoc 4/3/09 Page 14 PART C ESTIMATE OF THE COSTS OF THE IMPROVEMENTS , }'

C.l Pre-development Costs ·_.;-- The Department of Recreation and Parks 1s responsibh: fJf. conducting ·-· ·. ,.-~ . assessments for all of their own specified projects in the fivecyear plah prior to confirmation of the 2009-10 assessment and may also receive assistance.from the City Eb~ineer.'The City Engineer will also assist the Department of Cultural AffairsandBther Departments in preparation of their enviromnental documentation.

For the competitive grants, applicant~ $~;rrequired to's#~fuita completed enviromnental review, or if they need a NegatiVe )')ecor~f{~~ oi Enviromnental Impact Report, they could apply for enviromnental plan provides specific predevelopment cost fund~~lon:./ -·- th~'d(i(},~lO'·'-><::::>>'- e~peAditute.-,-.. allocations fot specified projects. Pte-development may include but not be limited to costs associated ~1.h.initial site investigatld~ for hazardous materials, lead paint studies, asbestos and other studies;~g~J~r,e~ by Califor;#~ Enviromnental Quality Act (CEQA), and appraisals for acquisition projects. i f · . :;.:.,:::.::::~>>- .·/>-' <:;:;:r.:;:?·' ; C.2 Maintenance Costs

Proposition K requires that funding of the capital projects authorized by the Proposition be contingent upon a showing that the entity administering the project has the financial ability to provide the programming and staff for which the facilities are intended to be used. Although the Proposition provides funding for the maintenance of facilities that will be constructed with

Attach 9- Draft 2009-10 Engineers Report. doc 4/3/09 Page 15 assessment funds, there are limited funds available in Proposition K for maintenance, and the remainder will have to be funded by the grantees, the General Fund, or another funding source.

Proposition K allows for up to 15% of the total funds over the life of the assessment to be used for maintenance of completed projects. Maintenance funding is available for completed Proposition K projects that were specified in the ballot measure as well as projects that were awarded competitive grants.

Maintenance funds will be allocated as recommended by the Sf~~ringtofu~ittee and approved by Council. The Steering Committee has developed a list of potential proje~tifoi-2009-10 (Attachment 5) that could be recommended for maintenance funding.

C.3 Bonding and Bonding Costs

The ballot measure allows bonds to be issued ,r6; con~;t'tlc~ion and ac~~isition costs of any of the projects contemplated in the program. Tht:l;ldv~ht~gesbfb~~~iri~~re: ;)')_,;/:-:-: ::--:_<· -, ", 1. More projects can be l)lldeliaken in the 6ad)''~ears of the program; 2. Large projects gan be i'tJ~db~I:without taki~g up a large portion of the assessment in a givel1 year; and ·.. · ·. · 3 .. Land can be acq~ire~dming yeaf~ tllat it is relatively low in price. On Octo])~£5, 1999, the Counci~·a"dopted ··~ Communication from the Ad Hoc Committee on Childr'e~, ~o~tftaQ.d Their Familiesi'elative to the implementation of Proposition K Bonding. A list of projects was'~~ciptt:d at thattline for bonds to be issued in 1999-00, 2000-01, and 2001-02. Through subsequ~l1t'.¢&1Jneifil~d Steering Committee actions, changes have been made to the projects approved for !JgAG'funding. Should a project approved for bonding become infeasible or delayed, another project from LIST A, B, or C may be substituted by the Council. To date, the following projects have been approved for bonding by Council:

Attach 9- Draft 2009-10 Engineers Report. doc 4/3/09 Page 16 C.3.1 LIST OF PROJECTS AND COSTS APPROVED FOR BONDING

PROJECT LOCATION PROJECT COST 1. SHORT-TERM PROPOSITION K BONDS ISSUED IN 1999-00

Point Fermin Park Regional $1,800,000 Lincoln Park Lake CD 1 539,875 Shadow Ranch CD 3 1,350,000 Lemon Grove CD13 446,806

Hazard Park CD14 <> .,.,: ' 764,750 TOTAL ,i ' > ($4,901 ,431 2. LONG-TERM PROPOSITION K BONDS ISSUED IN 1()~9 00 ... ·: · '' •••..• < 7 .·· Santa Monica Mountains- Mandeville Regional·.······················ 3,0QQ,OOO Canyon \

South Central Sports Activity Center Regional ,' :· 2,727,080 ' : Victory Vineland Childcare CD.2•·· 2,100,000

Rancho Cienega Childcare Center CD 10 • •' 2,100,000 Washington Irving Middle School . CDJ3 ...... 1,374,700 ••••• TOTAL .... ·•.· '•, .· $11,301 '780 + :,-::::· 3. LONG-TERM PROPOSITIO~r(,BONDS IS~DitDIN 2000-01 Cabrillo Aquariur:n •0·:<. '· < >, Regional $4,980,000 Zoo .·.• .... ,...... ·:·.. ·•:·····•:.·· )· •.. ' ; : .. Regional 4,986,027 Children's Museum ...... • )., J·' Regional 1,375,000 El ¢l£ntro Del Pueblo '> CD13 929,990 . ···· ...... ·.. ·...... TOTAL $12,271,017 ··.' .· :' 4. LONG-TERMPROPOSITION K BONDS ISSUED IN 2001-02 Children's MtJs<'l:ur:n. .. > Regional $8,092,800 Observatory ) Regional 7,400,000 Zoo : ::· Regional 5,000,000 Green Meadows CDS 2,992,230 TOTAL $23,485,030

Attach 9- Draft 2009-10 Engineers Report. doc 4/3/09 Page 17 C.4 Administration Costs

For FY 2009-10, program administration costs are funded in the amount of $748,964. This amount is expected to partially reimburse the County Assessor, City Departments, and the General Fund for those activities supporting the Proposition K-LA for Kids Program. Historically, Departments have performed various tasks that are described in Paragraph C.5.

'• >~. c.s Administrative Costs for the Districtfgf'FY ~()Q9-lo (need update)

County Assessor (assess and collect Prop K funds on behalf of th'e City) $191200 '-· . (County charges $0.25 per parcel x 764401 parcels+ fees) Reimbursable Costs in Support of Assessment District

Dept. of Public Works Office of Accounting> . $136,457 -process payments for competitive and specified P[Ojects unde( tbe ,direction of the City Engineer

Bureau of Engineering, Dept. of pjgjic ~ork~, $421,307 -attend and support LA for Kids Steeri~g Committee · < < -attend and support Regional/LocalVoluh(E!~r Neighborhood Oversight Committees -prepare Engine~r·s .f\

Chief Legislative Analyst -participate and staff the LA for Kids Steering Committee, staff Regional VNOCs City Administrative Officer -chair and staff the L.A. for Kids Steering Committee, staff Regional VNOCs, administer Prop K funds City Attorney -review legal documents and advise on legal matters City Clerk -publish notices, schedule hearings, file construction contracts and grant agreements

Attach 9- Draft 2009-10 Engineers Report.doc 4/3/09 Page 18 Information Technology Agency - place assessments on tax roll, programming activities Cultural Affairs Department -oversee projects in the LA for Kids Program, convene Local Volunteer Neighborhood, oversight Committees Department of Recreation and Parks -provide information for the project management team, staff Local Volunteer Neighborhood Committees for Department projects

TOTAL $748,964

:' ',,. C.6 Allocation of Accumulated Interest/Inflation Funds

Revenues for Proposition K consist of the annual assesspent plus penalties< and interest. The primary use of this interest is to make up shortfalls, dueto.taxpayer delinquencies, in the $25 million assessed each year for program costs. A portion of the program costs is an "inflation pool" to provide for increased coststot.h9,capital projebtsas a result of inflation over the 30-year life of the program. The assuinecl,ihf!ation factor has been consistently identified as three percent per year. Typi~~lly, for a'nuJU!Jerof those projects, the funding provided from the inflation pool is ,i]lsuffiC:ient; For 20?,.-10, the inflation allowance of $3,644,707 was sufficient to fund thos'e projectsrequiringll1flation allocation.

Excess interest can be applied to provide funding for projects with increased costs above the three percegt .i.\1tJ.~ti91,1ary facto(jJ).lt within some other objective inflation index, such as the Constmter PriceJnde\c.

Exct;ss interest funds are &l~tributed ·on a pnonty basis to (1) non-bonded specified p~oj~dfs that have a need \l~c1 have not yet received the full three percent inflation allocatio~ pf inflation pool ftlhds, (2) non-bonded specified projects that have a need and have recdyed the three perceht allocation but may receive additional inflation funds based on an objective index, and (3) bond funded projects for the time prior to their receipt of debt service (inflation) funds.

In200S 06, using the above eriteria, mwess interest funding of!\3,60·1,006 was allocated to Proposition K Year 9 projects that the City Engineer identified as needing and qualifying for additional funds. For 2006 07, no interest was identified or applied to Proposition K Year 10 projects. For 2007 08, !> in interest was allaeated ta Prapasitian K Year 11 prajeets. The list of projects being funded with BllCess inflation monies is identified in the Five Year Plan (Attachment 1).

Attach 9- Draft 2009-10 Engineers Report.doc 4/3/09 Page 19 C.7 Summary Oflmprovement Cost Estimate (need update)

ITEMS FY 2008-09 FY 2008-09 FY 2009-10 Estimated Obligation Estimated Funds Received Anticipated Improvement Costs

Pre-Development 0 0 Competitive Grants 7,694,449 5,838,527 Regional Parks 4,086,376 ..... 3,742,857 Local Parks . l),565,491 I> " ... 5,318,250 Info Tech Agn for projects ./ I 50,000 LIST A Projects Subtotal 18,346,316 > .. 14,94!),634 Administrative Cost <74.3,080 ... ·. 748,964 Maintenance Projects Cost g,372,053 2,567,711 Inflation ..•. 3,5380551 3,644,707 Debt Service for Short Term Borrowing Q •• .... 0 Debt Service for Long Term Bond 0 ••••. 3,088,984 •··.· . TOTAL ASSESSMENT ALLOCATION ... ·• . 25,000,000 25,000,000 Interest allocated to projects · 0 0 ... .. •••• ··•?, . TOTAL ALLOCATION . .. 25,000,000 25,000,000 .·····...... : . •••••• ... . Fund Received for FY 2008-09 .. r.. < ...... 40% Advance ...••,. ,:§,993,454 (12/20/08) ·.·•·.· .. >.C·<········. ',, 't)::;:;·:;>., 10% Advance 249$364' .•. ,::···· .... ' '>>, •.,··.<·< (1/19/09) >. • •••••••••••••••••••••••••••• 1" Installment .• · 0 1,824,594 112/20/09) .· .· •..• ·•••··. 85% Advance: ••••••••t 7,119,486 (4/20/09) Subtotal .•.... • .. •• 21,435,898 Balance due from Cour1ty't;.::; .• •'·'• ••• 3,564,102 Surplus or Deficit Carried oife(,f(<).i,!)'previous year 0 0 Net Assessment for FY 20()921 0 25,000,000

Estimated District Total Benefit Points 1,816,200

Estimated Assessment Rate 13.77 ($ per Benefit Point)

Attach 9- Draft 2009-10 Engineers Report. doc 4/3/09 Page 20 PART D BOUNDARIES OF DISTRICT ANO ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM

The boundaries of the District are coterminous with the bound~~$clfthe Cityo/t~sAngeles. The Diagram showing the exterior boundaries of the District and the lin~~li~ficl dimensions of each lot or parcel of land within the District has been submitted tp tli~ Qle~k of the C;~ 6f'Los Angeles. A reduced scale copy is included in this Report. The lines andidlmensibh~ gf each !of ~r parcel within the District are those lines and dimensions shown on the)11ap~~{ the; Assess~; otthe County of Los Angeles that support the secured tax roll for Fiscal Yeai 2009~ 10 and tlte,available updates. The Assessor's maps and records are incmporated by rP.iier<,nrP hgreiri and made part df this Repmt. In all cases, the Assessm's itll deltall:i c(Jncel:ning th~li~~s.

Attach 9- Draft 2009-10 Engineers Report. doc 4/3/09 Page 21 CH:.• cot, Los ,-.\ngele:s. _,""'¥,.;· Fl'i!iftW.lY' .....v-i'dlrn-ar :!;t·l\!'>e~

Attach 9- Draft 2009-10 Engineers Report. doc 4/3/09 Page 22 PARTE BENEFIT ASSESSMENT FORMULA AND METHOD

E.l General

The Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972 provides that ~~sessmenl~~~!-J~.apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes that assessment which tint~fraJ::ile the benefits shall be equitably distributed citywide.

E.2 ImprovementB~:11eflt~ > ;>

E.2.1 Benejitto Property)ri!fit;ParkamJRecreation Facilities

,_:,;':<'},\;_ . . :\U{\ < Studiesiri·il:J1\Jliiber of communities,.,iricluding counties and cities throughout the Urrited States, have indicated that ;~cr~~ti()n areas and fa~ti¥ties, if well maintained and wisely administered, have caused a marked increase ill ££~h~JZI:y valuef'~f parcels in the community. Consequently, such recreation and park facilities have pro~~~ "& ·p~tent factor in maintaining a sound econonric condition and a high .standard of livability in the commurrity. These studies confirm the opirrion long held by planning authorities as to the economic value of open spaces in a community.

"The recreation value is realized as a rise in the value of land and other property in or near the recreation area, is of both private interest to the landowner and others holding an economic stake in the area, and of public interest to the taxpayers, who have a stilke in a maximum of total assessed value." (National Recreation and Park Association, June, 1985)

Attach 9- Draft 2009-10 Engineers Report. doc 4/3/09 Page 23 The benefit of parks and other recreational facilities to residential and connnercial/industrial properties has been sunnnarized by a number of studies. The United States Department of the Interior, National Park Services, in a publication of June, 1984, concluded that:

• "Parks and recreation stimulate business and generate tax revenues."

• "Parks and recreation create direct and indirect job opportunities."

• "Parks and recreation help conserve land, energy, and resources."

• "An investment in parks and recreation helps reduce. pollution and nqjse, makes communities more livable, and increases property values."

• "Public recreation benefits all employers by providing•·~~~~iAUii;Jg opportu~iBes to maintain a level of fitness throughout one's working life, and through ~~I~fhg iJ.l:clividuals cope with the stress of a fast-paced and demanding life."

In addition, a publication of the NationakRecr~ation.and ParldlAssociation states: "Industry is demanding recreation services" and in e~~~~ring site S~l~;cti6n is increasingly taking into account " ... the educational and recreational oppo@hities ... " availati{

Property valuesin~·~~rr::i~~~itr(;reased~l,t

E.2.2 Benefit to property in the District from the Improvements

Assessment Jaw provides that benefit must be related to the land since it is the land which must bear the assessment. The park, open spaces, and recreational improvements proposed for the District will

Attach 9- Draft 2009-1 0 Engineers Report. doc 4/3/09 Page 24 specifically benefit the properties to be assessed by increasing the property value of each parcel in one or more of the following respects:

1) Increased economic value of improved property due to increased capacity to draw business, horne buyers, tourists and others to the District; 2) Expanded employment opportunities and increased economic activity due to increased capacity to attract business; 3) Increased economic health of the region due to stimulation and generation of additional tax revenues; 4) Increased attractiveness of the District for developrnenJ: cili~~dev~~()p~~~t as a result of the preservation of mountains, foothills and canyo4s, and incr~~sed.p)lblic access to these lands; · · .· 5) Improved environmental quality by protecting restoring

6) Improved air and water quality, capacity of road~,. transportation and other public infrastructure systems as a result of more evenly 4isrersing recreational facilities throughout the District; 7) Increased attractiveness of the Districtas i(Jlace tclworktllicllive; ~·· \,··.<< >/ <>' ·.-._ .. 8) Improved recreational opporturrities ffud expand~d (\ccessto recreational facilities for all properties within the Districtl prtough impro~~fri&ilt~>such as beaches, parks, trails and other publicre<;)e(\tional fadli{ies; .·· > ·..... · 9) Increased sa.fety ri:na J~~bility of park

The irnprov~thents to be funded bY the District are acquisition, development, improvement and restoratio~ ~;dj6Hsfor park, recreatidd,beach and open space purposes. These improvement projects include: regional f~bilities which q()J~fit the entire District; regional facilities which benefit large areas of the District; and facilities which benefit smaller, local areas of the District. The ~~f~lJor]lo~d/··-·--·----- jrnprovernents are distrib~t~d among these different categories of regional and local use to ensure that all areas of the District will benefit; funds for improvements are also distributed throughout all geographic areas of the District.

Regional projects, by their definition, are of area-wide benefit; therefore, the regional facilities in Los Angeles City cumulatively benefit all properties within the District. As described above, the local projects are distributed throughout the proposed District and are of regional significance. The

Attach 9- Draft 2009-10 Engineers Report doc 4/3/09 Page 25 acquisition, improvement, and restoration of both local and regional parks, beaches and open space lands and recreation facilities are distributed throughout the proposed District and therefore are of direct and specific benefit to all parcels within the District. All areas benefit equally from the proposed improvements with benefit to parcels varying with their land use.

E.3 Benefit Points

To establish the benefit to the individual parcels with their varyi!lg[~d~~~s,ibenefit point system is used. Each land parcel and each improvement on a land parc~lis assigngd Benefit points in proportion to the benefit the land and the improvements (as reflected il1land u~e) receive. The total number of points is then divided into the annual revenue requirem~ri(]1ecessary to,futld fue proposed improvements to determine the benefit obligation for each poirit. Ond{!henumber of benefit points for each parcel has been established, the benefit obligi'ltio]J, f()r each parc6flte§iablished and thus the amount of assessment for each parcel is established;:

E.3.1 Land Size Benefit

In order to fairly allocate benefit from the ~roposed irnpro~elil.ents to parcels throughout the District, it is necessary to address th& B~ti~~t~ tp land akd.to.land use. The benefit received by land varies as land ','>>-~~------_, --:>;;;;_<;:~>-<--_<-<-- -> .:-,_ --- . varies in size. Itii.~ur finding th~(J~¥g~tr parcelg~ehefit more than smaller parcels. To use the benefit point system/iris necessary to estaBii~~ separat~ly the benefit for each of the two elements, land size benefit benefit. To this procedure, the median single-family home is used as a.hJW]'l!'~~ement;;------f'~gilitate--' a standard to wiJibh ~ll other properties are related. The median single-family home in Los Angeles City is located on a lofQ~approX.llilately 1/7 of an acre in area with the relative valuation between the

.home and lot being 75%.artd25%. respectively. This relative valuation is based upon the opinion of professional appraisers, ap~raising current market property values for real estate in Southem Califomia. The land value portion typically ranges from 20 to 30 percent; for this report we are using 25 percent. This evaluation is based upon current market conditions, not on assessed values, which have been skewed by the impact of Proposition 13.

The lot, therefore, has 1/3 the weight of the improvement (.25/.75). Assigning one benefit point to a house as the standard and using the 1/3 ratio, the lot would then represent 1/3 of a benefit point. See the

Attach 9- Draft 2009-10 Engineers Report.doc 4/3/09 Page 26 discussion on "Land Use (Improvement) Benefits" below where one benefit point is assigned to a single-family house. As stated above, the median single-family home is located on a lot of approximately 1/7 of an acre; therefore, the median density for single-family residential property in Los Angeles City is 7 units per acre; thus the benefit point for the typical acre occupied by single-family homes would be 7 x 1/3, or 2.33 benefit points per acre. This 2.33 benefit points per acre is used as the basis for assessing the land size benefit to all assessable parcels within the District.

E.3.2 Land Use (Improvement) Benefit

That portion of the benefit that inures to land use or improveinent value V\li\1, of course, vary with the type ofland use. This benefit for land use is condensed and s~lst~gatedinto thre~ ~~tegories below, and each category is assigned portions of a benefit point (BP) rel:>tiV~

Improvement Assigned Benefit Percentage 1. Economic the increase to improY~d property)~ajue,due to increased .50BP Value economic activity/ ~4 health, ex'partded employment o~portuniti~s. and. increised capacity to draw business, home .· b.uyers; tq th(;) District. ' ~eflters;.tourists,.,.,.-- -' -- et~;-, > ------2. Environmental'· the increase t~ improved pro~erty value due to the improved .25 BP Quality. quality of air, water, visual aesthetics, attractiveness of the District as a placeto. live and work, etc . 3. Recreation (]!~ increase to "·,·---:-<'-'·· "'··;e:>-·':______j ____ _j

Benefits to land uses therefore, the above factors have been assigned to each land use classification as shown in Table I.

Attach 9- Draft 2009-10 Engineers Report.doc 4/3/09 Page 27 E.4 Benefit Points for Different Types of Properties

E.4.1 Single-Family Residence

A single-family residence receives all three of the above benefits, therefore 1.0 BP is assigned to each single-family residence. The land upon which the home is located receives a separate benefit, which is 2.33 times the acreage of the lot upon which the home is situated. The benefit to a typical single-family residence is the summation of these two: i.e., one plus 2.33 times tile area ofth~ parcel in acres.

To assess land use benefit equitably, it is necessary to relate th.e different ~af261 classifications to each other. Using one benefit point for a single-family residential Ul1it, all other uses are/elated to this.

E.4.2 Multiple-Residential and Mobile Home

Multiple-residential and mobile home land use equjyill~h~~iu;e reduced byi£'ultiplying the number of home units on each parcel by . 75 and .5, respectively, due t6 tl"i~reliitivepopulation density of these types of dwelling units compared to the typici4•de~sity ofsinglej~ffiiJY units. Studies have consistently shown that an apartment unit impacts iJlli~structure aj)~[oximately 7 5% as much as a single family residence, and mobile homes impact i~ffastru.:;ture appro~~~tely 50% as much (Sources: Institute of Transportation Report.ifrip Generation, Fifth Edition, 1991; Metcalf and Eddy, Engine&t~futb~~tiOnal'" '<<;'"•' --' " Wastewater Engirieering TreatmelltDl~posal Rells"{ Third Edition, 1991). The reduced impact on park and recreati<~H~l facility use by resicl~~i§ of multiple-residential and mobile homes results in a lesser enhance~e~i~~B'\imt to property valB~{ Therefore, the Economic Value, Environmental Quality, and _:·::::;:_.• .. _>':\;_ y:::· Recreation Enhancemei)t benefit poihts for multiple-residential and mobile homes have been uniformly reduced to 75% and 50'9o,il"espectively. (See Table 1)

The benefit points assigned to a multiple-residential or a mobile home parcel for the Land Use (Improvement) portion of the assessment are calculated based on the number of housing units and the appropriate benefit point per housing unit. The benefit points for multi-residential (.75) are multiplied by the number of dwelling units on the parcel to determine the total Land Use (Improvement) benefit points for the parcel. The total Land Use (Improvement) benefit points for a mobile home parcel are calculated by multiplying the benefit point per home unit (.50) by the number of units on the parcel.

Attach 9- Draft 2009-10 Engineers Report. doc 4/3/09 Page 28 The benefit points for the land size portion of the assessment are calculated by multiplying the land area in acres by 2.33 benefit points per acre. These two amounts are then added together to obtain the total number of benefit points for the parcel.

E.4.3 Commercial/Industrial- Other

For determining the land use benefit points to be assigned for properties in commercial/industrial use, these properties are first related to the basic single-family unit. The median home in the District has a lot size of approximately 1/7 of an acre, therefore the typical single~familJ'residential density is seven dwelling units per acre. All properties that are developed fol"<·commerci~J!f~4ustrial are thus assigned seven benefit points per acre for the land use portion of the•. patcel. Each land use category of commercial/industrial property is then evaluated as to whether•6t•riMthe three compClnbnts of the land use benefit point (i.e., Economic Value, Environmental Quality and~~<:r~:hion Enhancement) apply to •/ ,,,,-,.- - --- the particular land use category.

Commercial/industrial properties that have. been fdtmd-· \ ---· ,_- ·- ~~1f()j~\im---- these properties are not affectecl{ih any way by park and recreation improvements. All commerciai/i!lahstrial properties beJ~fH from increased environmental quality as a result of the improvements; t~~f~f,ore, all coill111~rciallindustrial properties are assigned a factor of .25 BP for ~--:_:{_;;::!\:;<_ -._;::': Environmental Qualit)'. orJwse properties, which are used by or which serve people, are benefited by improved and increased~itrr{ and recreational facilities; they are assigned a factor of .25 BP for Recreational Enhancement. (See Table I)

The assignments of these various benefit points are set forth in Table I.

Additionally, a higher level of use for a commercial/industrial property is identified when an improvement has multiple stories or occupies a greater percentage of the parcel than that which is the

Attach 9- Draft 2009-10 Engineers Report. doc 4/3/09 Page 29 norm. To account for this, the benefit point for the property use is multiplied by a number which is proportional to the intensity of the structures and improvements contained on the property.

The typical coverage of a commercial/industrial parcel with a structure is 33%. Using this as the standard, the square footage of an improvement on a parcel, as this value is set forth in the Los Angeles County Assessor's records, is divided by one-third of the area of the parcel in square feet. The number then becomes proportional to the intensity of development on the parcel and represents an equivalent number of stories that may be found on a parcel. For the purpos()d[ldenflfyingthis factor, it is set forth as "equivalent stories" in the benefit point equation. A min'iinum of story" will be . . o~e"equivalent. . . ' applied to any improved commercial/industrial property. \ivheg the coverage infol1nation of a commercial/industrial parcel is not available from the County Office, the actual number of .--.A~s~ssor's .• -.... structure stories is used instead of the "equivalent stories".

E.4.4 Vacant Property

Vacant property has no Land Use Benefits a~~gci~t~d wi~it¥~~il.ita vacant parcel is designated as ,·:··. N, , .. '·' commercial/industrial or residential, it reC:~i~~~ no adclttiopJ!l< benefits because of its designation, as there are no improvements constructed ~~()fl it; therefo;~;·~~6ant property receives only a Land Size Benefit of 2.3 3 benefit polhts ~~f~c\~·

E.4.5 Exewftt Properties . ->:. ·::·,-; .·-· Severaliancl~~il> J+ave been determindcl to be exempt from the assessment because they either do not benefit from t~~ BfSp()~ed improveni~~ts or they have restricted uses that would not be in the public interest to acquire i~tlfl();;ent()ff~reclosure. Examples are common areas, open spaces, green belts, sliver parcels, etc. Also ~~effipt are public properties, all lands designated as agricultural, lands that have physical or legal restrictions preventing development thereon, and that portion of vacant parcels in excess of five acres. Also exempt is that portion of any partially improved single parcel that is in excess of five acres of which no use is being made. Such parcels that are partially improved will often appear on the Assessor's roll as improved.

Attach 9- Draft 2009-10 Engineers Report. doc 4/3/09 Page 30 Those parcels that are found to be so classified after field review will have their assessments revised per this report. This is because vacant land greater than five acres functionally serves as open space.

E.S Modifications

It is recognized, that when dealing with the hundreds of thousands of parcels that will be part of this Assessment District, using the secondary information on the Los Angeles County Assessor's tapes as the primary source for the assessment formula may lead to some err6rs m~d some circumstances that do not precisely fit the intent of this program.

Where such circumstances are discovered, either by the perso~g ~drninistratingthi~ pl'()gram, or by the owners of the properties affected, such circumstances will h{re~drtbtl to the Proposition K Group, Program Management Division of the City Engineer. The. function and ihe~uthority of the Engineering ~- . .. . Proposition K Group will be to recommend such corre(;rlons or adjustl'lients with such proposed changes being consistent with the concept, umaiLand parameters (lf the programs set forth herein. Unless such proposed changes are the City Council, they will be incorporated into the Assessment Roll.

E.6

In accord,arig~lkth Section 22572 o;tJ];:Streets and Highways Code, the net amount of the assessment to eachparcel,a~shown on the Count;·~ssessment roll, will be computed in the following steps: ··.-·,·,··-· .·.

1. Classify each~~~~l'l:J~lit!t~:~se as shown on the County of Los Angeles Assessor's Roll.

2. Assign benefit poi~ts (BPs) to each parcel based on the following formulas:

Attach 9- Draft 2009-10 Engineers Report. doc 4/3/09 Page 31 For Residential Properties:

Residential BPs

= Improvements BPs + Land Size BPs (Economic Value BP + Environmental Quality BP + Recreation Enhance BP) * No Units + (2.33 BPs/acre) * Parcel Acreage

For Commercial Properties:

Commercial BPs

=Improvement BPs+ Land Size BPs = [(Econ Val BP + Envir Qual BP + Recr Enh BP)/:ci~ ~ 7 BP * Parcel Acreage *No. Equivalent Stories (1)] + [(2.33 BPs/acre)* Parcel ABr~age]

11 ! No. Equivalent Stories is the number ot $fbn~s~e~~(lred by divt!:!J~g the parcel's improved square feet by one-third of the parcel area (lmprovedSqufjreJeet/113 x Parcel Square Feet). >::::_:<> ::<: ·-:->:::- _::'• <---·<.:- ·"·>>.';\' -;:~:- ,:-.-'>_;:::·: 3. Divide the annual amount to be colleCted by the sum 6f all benefit points to determine the assessment per benefit point. Using $13.77 per b~rf~ftt~oint, a median single-family residence would have ananntia1ass"ssrfr~~tof'$J8.35 ( 1.3329 benefit points times $13.77 = $18.35).

The total assess~ent tobe levie:o~~~ch parce!~ill be the sum of the annual assessment per parcel over 30 y'e~ts.The Benefit Points i;; the annual assessment for each parcel will remain in effect tmless a~d u~iiiih~property is recla~$,(fied into another land use category, at which time the Benefit Points for the asse~~)#enJfor that p~h~l will be recalculated.

Attach 9- Draft 2009-10 Engineers Report.doc 413109 Page 32 ENGINEER'S REPORT CITY OF LOS ANGELES LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING DISTRICT NO. 96-1 (Pursuant to the Landscaping and Lighting act of 1972)

The undersigned respectn!lly submit the report as directed by the City Council. DATE: ______, 2009 By ______GARY LEE MOORE, P.E., City Engineer

I HEREBY CERTIFY that the Engineer's Report, together withAss~ssm~~ta.l1d Assessment Diagram thereto attached, was filed with me on the ____day of ______, 2009.

KAREN E. Kf\LFA~~;(:ityCJerk

. <·> I HEREBY CERTIFY that the Engineer's Rep\5tt, tofether ,~tfi' Assessment and Assessment Diagram thereof attached, was approved ai1d confmn~(i !Jy the City Council of the City of Los ' ' ------~;--,; <: Angeles, California, on the dai:M.,_.------' 2009.

( ~N E. KALF A Y AN, City Clerk . By ______

I HEREBY cBkTIFY that the Report, together with Assessment and Assessment Diagram there~~ attached, is filed with the County Auditor of the County of Los Angeles no later than thelri1Mohday in August 2009. ---; ------

FRANK T. MARTINEZ, City Clerk City of Los Angeles

By ------

Date: ______

Attach 9- Draft 2009-10 Engineers Report. doc 4/3/09 Page 33 TABLE 1 City of Los Angeles Landscaping and Lighting District NO. 96-1 Improvement Benefit Points

County Property Tax Eco- Environ- Recre- Total nomic mental ation lmprov B.P. B. P. B.P. B. P. Use Code I Land Use Description Residential 01 0.5000 1.00

02-06 0.3750

07,09 0.2500

Commercial/Industrial [1 Acre~ (Econ Val+ Envir Qual+ Rec Enh) x 7 BP x No. ofloquivalenl Sftl.des]

I --V I o.oo I o.oo I o.oo I o.oo Exempt Property (Not Assessed for land or improved value) 40-59 Agricultural 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 77 Cemeteries 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 81,84-89 Misc. and Utilities 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Attach 9- Draft 2009-10 Engineers Report. doc 4/3/09 Page 34 APPENDICES

A. Sample Benefit Point (BP) Calculations:

1. Residential Properties:

Residential BPs

= [Improvements BPs]+ [Land Size BPs] .· .. ·.··.·.· . ' = [(Economic Value BP +Environmental QualitY l3P + Jt6ci·eation Enhance BP) *No Units]+ [(2.33 BPs/acre)* Parcel Acreage] . . . .·· .

The following are examples of residential assessments:

Median Single Fanlily Residence (SFR) (I home on 1/7 acre)BPs

= [(.5 + .25 + .25) BP!unit * 1 home]+ (2.33 'A-l/7 ac) BPs = !Improvement BP + 0.3329 Land Si'0~BP = 1.3329 BPs ;c: . .:::::-::v:;: SFR (1 home on 114 acre) BPs · :

= [(.51•:25+..2:;)~P/Um;~ l~b!J!"']+ (2.33 BPIacre* 114 ac) = l}mprovem~~t BJ'Y0.:;825 L~'hil'§izeBP = 1.5825 BPs . - . . Mciti"Family (MF) (25 units ~n 1/3 acre) BPs

<~[~.~JS + .1875 + .1~+~) BP/unit * 25 MFunits] + (2.33 BP/acre * 113 ac) = 1S:15Irr!ProvementBPs + .7777 Land Size BP = 19.s:H1·BPs< ..

Mobile Homes (100 units on 1/2 acre) BPs

= [(.25 + .125 + .125) BP!unit * 100 homes]+ (2.33 BP/ac * 112 acre) = 50 Improvement BPs+ 1.165 Land Size BPs = 51.165 BPs

Attach 9- Draft 2009-10 Engineers Report. doc 4/3/09 Page 35 2. Commercial Properties:

Commercial BPs

=Improvement BPs+ Land Size BPs

= [(Econ Val BP + Envir Qual BP + Recr Enh BP)/acre * 7 BP *Parcel Acreage *No. Equivalent Stories (1)] + [(2.33 BPs/acre)* Parcel Acreage]

!I) No. Equivalent Stories is the number ofstories measure1 !p'.divi,ding th~parce/ 's improved square feet by one-third of the parcel area (Improved!';q!lare Fee(/)(3x Parcel Square Feet). '>' >,',<' ', > The following are examples of varying commerciUlor industri~~sse~sment calculations:

Office (3 stories, 1/2 acre) BPs

= [(.5 + .25 + .25) BP/acre * 3 stories * 7 BP/ac * 1/2~6]~ (2.33 BP/ac * 112 ac) = 10.5 Improvement BPs+ 1.1650 Land Si~e[lf'/. . = 11.6650 BPs

Parking Lot (1 acre) BPs

= [(0 + .25 + 0) BP/ac * 1~196, * 7 BP/ac *

Improvement BPs Size BPs (Z~ro Improvement + (2.33 BPs/acre) * Parcel Acreage

Anfx&mple of a vachnt parcel's assessment computation follows:

Vacant Laft~ (!O~cres) BPs

= 0 BP +6.33 BP!acre * 10 ac) = 0 Improvement BPs+ 23.3 Land Size BPs = 23.3000 BPs

Attach 9- Draft 2009-10 Engineers Report. doc 4/3/09 Page 36 B. Sample Assessment Calculations:

Rate for 2009-10 = $13.77 D+E+F GxB 2.33xC H+l $13.77xJ A B c' c D E I F G H I J K LAND USE No. Land Land lmprov Benefit Sum Sum of Land Total Annual CATEGORY of =ft X ft Size Eco- Envir- Recre- of lmprov. Size Assess- Unit or te (acre) BP BP BP DEF BP BP BP ment Residential Single Family Residential 1 6,223 1/7 0.50 0.25 0.25 1.00 1.00 0.33 1.33 $18.35 includes: Condos, 1 40x80 0.0735 0.50 0.25 0.25 1.00 1.00 0.17 1.17 $16.13 Townhouses, Vacant 1 50x100 0.1148 0.50 0.25 0.25 1.00 .1.00 0.27 1.27 $17.45 Residential Lands, ... 1 100x150 0.3444 0.50 0.25 .· 0:2.5 1.00 1.00 0.80 1.80 $24.82 1 10,890 1/4 0.50 0.25. '0.25 1.00 1.00 0.58 1.58 $21.79 1 21,780 1/2 0.50 0.25 0.25 1.00 '· 1.00 1.17 2.17 $29.81 1 43,560 1 0.50 0.25. 0.25 '1.00 • •too 2.33 3.33 $45.85 1 65,340 1 1/2 0.50 0.25 .•:0.25. 1.00 1.. 00 3.50 4.50 $61.90 1 87,120 2 0.50 0.25 :'0.25 1.00 1:00 I 4.56 5.66 $77.94 Multi-Family Residential 25 14,520 1/3 0.38 0.19 0.19 :: 0.75 18.75 0.78 19.53 $268.88 includes: Duplex, 2 80x100 0.184 0.38 0.19 0.19 '0.75 1.50 0.43 1.93 $26.55 Triplex, Fourplex, 3 100x120 0.275 0.38 0.19 0.19 '0:75 2.25 0.64 2.89 $39.82 Apartments, or 4 120x80 0.220 0.38 . 0.19 0.19 o:75 I • 3.00 0.51 3.51 $48.38 combinations, ... 4 21,780 1/2 . 0.38 :·o,19 0.19 0.75 3.00 1.17 4.17 $57.35 5 43,560 1 .· 0.38 :0'0)9 0.19 0.75 3.75 2.33 6.08 $83.72 6 87,120 2 0.38 I 0.19. Q.19 0.75 4.50 4.66 9.16 $126.13

Commercial/Industrial Bull~~~ ·Lot .,;·: : .· EqSto A'P:re:.c:lr tf D+E+F GxBx7xC 2.33xC H+l $13.77xJ includes, Office Buildings 3 1/2 0.50.•••••• 0.25· 0.25 1.00 10.50 1.17 11.67 $160.63 Hotels, Motels, Clubs, 1 1/;800 ·: 5,400 0.50 •·o.25 0.25 1.00 0.87 0.29 1.16 $15.93 Medical Buildings, ... .20.3 460,970. '68,220 0.50 0.25 0.25 1.00 222.23 3.65 225.88 $3,110.36 . :):2 l•i· 3,600 .. ·•.9,000 0.50 0.25 0.25 1.00 1.74 0.48 2.22 $30.S3 0:75 I' }.:1 o,ooo 40;000 ·.· 0:50 0.25 0.25 1.00 4.82 2.14 6.96 $95.85 .·.·.··········\ 6.89 ···:>50,000 112•': .. 0.50 0.25 0.25 1.00 24.10 1.17 25.27 $347.96 ·• . 89.3 1,'100,000 1.0800 0.50 0.25 0.25 1.00 674.93 2.52 677.45 $9,328.45 1 :: ,: 1 0.00 0.25 0.00 0.25 0.25 2.33 2.58 $35.53 Parking.~?~-·········.·············:·,~· ••. 1 :.':• 3 0.00 0.25 0.00 0.25 0.25 6.99 7.24 $99.69 :.C' Vacant Land 1 ••• 10 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 11.65 11.65 $16D.42 ·~ 1 ••••• 5 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 11.65 11.65 $160.42 ··::,:;:•.-t... '.:/'•' Note: Questions reQardinQ Cquritv::l:!ai\d Use Codes, please call the County Assessor Office at (213) 974-3211. 1. See TABLE 1 for the lmprovertfent Benefit Points. 2. For Residential properties: SUm of Basic lmprov B.P.(Col. G)- Cols. (D+E+F) 3. For Residential properties: Sum of lmprov B.P.(Col. H) =Col. G x Col. B 4. For Commercial properties: Use Equivalent Stories to calculate the Sum of lmprov B.P. 5. Land Size B.P.(Col. I) - 2.33 x Col. C 6. Total Benefit Points (Col. J) -Col. H+Col. I 7. Annual Assessment Col. K) = $13.86 x J, where $13.86 is the assessment per Benefit Point. 1 acre-43,560 It", 1/7 acre= 6,222.8571 It"=( 78.88511" It" =50 x 124.46 It"- 60 x 103.71 It" City Total BP- 1,816,200 City Total Annual Asmt = $25,000,000 Asmt per BP- $25,000,000/1 ,816,200-$13.77/BP

Attach 9- Draft 2009-10 Engineers Report. doc 4/3/09 Page 37 REFERENDUM ORDINANCE K PROPOSED REFERENDUM ORDINANCE FOR CITY-WIDE PARKS, RECREATION AND COMMUNITY FACILITIES ASSESSMENT

AN ORDINANCE ORDERING FORMATION OF AN ASSESSMENT DISTRICT PURSUANT TO PROVISIONS OF THE LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1972 (DIVISION 15, PART2, STREETS AND HIGHWAYS CODE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA)

WHEREAS, parks, recreation and community facilities in the City ofL(/S Angeles comprise the City's youth infrastmcture and are an important part of providing positive alternatives.J9r:yo~th;:dnd -· WHEREAS, the City's youth infrastructure is inadequate or ded~;~g in ma!ly!ilapes, resulting in serious unrnet needs for park, recreation and community facilities; and - . · .. WHEREAS, the current condition of the City's youth infrastrub:fuf~··l*detrimentallo•\h¢ residential and business climate and value of real property; and ,. · · .. · · WHEREAS, it is in tbe best interest of the residents, business owners and~p·¥~~\'qr~ and property owners of the City that an assessment district be formed, which is cotermi):lq~s with the City, (o.fu~d·· the purposes of the assessment district consistent with the plan of expenditur<:s>s~i':f~rth. in the City 'Ei{giheer's Report referred to below; and . .. . ·;•.: ·

WHEREAS, the City Council on May 14, 1996 adoJ.t¢dan Ord~~~e~firtiention to order the formation of an assessment district for park and recreation imprpy¢~ent:.p-u~po~~s purswlnt.io··:the provisions of the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972; and .. · · WHEREAS, the City Council gave no(i~~ in the manner rg4tired ~y law of the time and place for a public meeting and a public hearingon th\' questionOffdrmation of the District and levy of proposed assessment; and

WHEREAS, ap!!bllt ri1eetfu~\Ycis:held on JJrie 4, 1991!; and a public hearing was held on July 9, 1996, and the City Councilhas' heard protest;; t;,stim0ny, eviddllce and public comment and the City Clerk has determined that a majority protest does not exist; and :: ·• ·

WHEREA§,this Ordinance shall not':l~ke effect unless and until the question of approval of the matters set forth berein 'shallh~ye been submitted to tHe electorate of the City and approved by a majority of voters voting on the question; NOW THERE~C>M;the People ofthe City of Los Angeles do ordain as follows: SECTION L This

SECTION 2. The City Council hereby adopts, approves and confirms the final City Engineer's report filed with the City Clerk, including the diagram for the Assessment District and the Assessment The Assessment is levied within the City in accordance with the City Engineer's Report and this Ordinance at a rate not to exceed the amount set forth in the City Engineer's Report. The City Engineer's Report describes the boundaries of the Assessment District, the locations of certain of the improvements to be funded by the District, the method and rationale for spreading the proposed assessment in proportion to the benefit received by each lot or parcel of land within the District. Each of the protests to the Assessment has been considered and is hereby denied. The City Engineer's Report is by this reference incorporated herein as though set forth in full.

Referendum Ordinance K Approved by the Voters on November 5, 1996 Proposition K Text Page 1 SECTION3. The City Council fmds, detennines and declares that:

(a) The acquisition, development, improvement, restoration and maintenance of parks, recreation and community facilities confers a direct and special benefit to all parcels in the City by improving economic, environmental, and recreational conditions and by improving the availability and utility of and access to parks, recreation and community facilities for each parcel, all resulting in maintained or enhanced property values; and

(b) The properties referred to in the City Engineer's Report which are proposed to be assessed are benefited by the acquisitions and improvements provided for and the assessment is spread in proportion to the benefits; and

(c) The written protests filed and not withdrawn prior to the q!)"'clgsion.of tJ,e

(d) ~i::ri::::: interest, convenience and necessity require ct~~ creation :ftlle >City of Eos Angeles Landscaping and Lighting District 96-1 to acquire, improye .and maintain p~r\<~; !~creation and community facilities City-wide. > :". .. [> SECTION 4. As used in this Ordinance the following terms have the indicated meanings:

~" Assessmenf' means the assessment levied withi~ __·f4e:·c_ity pursuant to thi_S:(?fdinance. "Assessment District" or "District" means City ofLosAJ1/?,eles Landsca~·ing and Lighting District 96- 1, the boundaries of which shiill.be cot~rmino\ls with the boundaries of the City. "Code" means the Streets and 1-ligh;\'&~~Co~~-~fci~\ifornia,:' ~--- ·:-: -- >_::><:··::· .·.-· _/->·" "Nonprofit Organization" me ·'·yolith~::~f)k~qy~ding g~~f{Pf~~entj9n and intervention services. "<: <:/·.·.: :: - :::< ':'<:'·:'. "Paik" means a tract, I~(()i_;parcel of landiWith scenic, natural, open space or recreational values, set apart to con·S~t\ie;:natural, -sC-enic, cultural, historical or ecological resources for present and future generation, and to be used by the public as a place for rest, recreation, education, ex~tbise, inspiration or enjoyment. SECTION~.'Wl!Jld§,shall be used f~{·the purposes set forth in Attachment A hereto. Should any project become infeasible fdrafi&:reason dete11nined by the City Council or there are project savings, the City Council may reprogram the applicable:T\i~dsduringlhe process described in Section 13. SECTION 6. In order·i~-i~Wkgi~~ any funds pursuant to Section 5, nonprofit organizations, government entities and City departments must ~eil1onstrate the fmancial ability to provide progra1mning and programming staff once the capital improvements are completed. The City Council by ordinance will establish an open and competitive process to allocate funds designated in Section 5 for competitive grants, which will be available to nonprofit organizations, governmental entities and City departments for projects within the boundaries of the City. All funds for competitive grants shall be expended equitably city-wide. Priority for competitive grants will be given to projects, which address one or more of the following criteria: (a) Include an at-risk youth component, either by including training and employment of at-risk youth to implement the project or by providing facilities to serve at-risk youth; (b) Serve an area without similar services or facilities;

Referendum Ordinance K Approved by the Voters on November 5, 1996 Proposition K Text Page 2 (c) Permit expansion of an established, successful program to serve a larger population or to provide an increase in services; (d) Demonstrate community support; (e) Demonstrate high cost-effectiveness; (f) Demonstrate readiness of project; (g) Demonstrate sustainability of project; (h) Meet such other criteria as may be established by the City Council.

Regulations to administer these competitive grants shall be promulgated by af'cadmini~tering entity designated by the City Council by ordinance as specified in Section 9. · · · . . SECTION 7. Any park or facility acquired, developed, rehabilitate~'~;·r:stored;:Jithfunds derived under this Ordinance shall be open and accessible to the public without disC,~~ninati()ll, as to_:.r~Ce, color, .sex, sexual orientation, age, religious belief, national origin, marital status, physic~(O(~~didli handicaP. ~ir.lJ?-edical condition. SECTION 8. Reasonable public access to lands and facilities acquired.~ith funds made availi\llle pursuant to this Ordinance shall be provided except where that access may interfere Witt(fesources protection. "Reasonable public access" includes, but is not limited to, parking and public restrooms. · · ·

SECTION 9. The expenditure of assessment funds andt~e>b~e~~\l ..management ofth~ program projects, which together shall be known as the L.A. FOR KIDS Program,,shall be>a~m\nistered by tbiCity Council or by a City entity designated by the City Council by ordinance, whiclj,~hall rep6rdo.tl)e,City Coilncil annually on the status of the L.A. FOR KIDS Program and shall provide for publf9({Ji~tribution ofth~;)nnual report. SECTION 10. The City Council shalf~~tablish voiunteerB:i~borhood Oversight Committees in various areas of the City to advise the City on >etting priorities for whe.l)'projects will be done, advise on the design of projects and prepare annual reports to the.City.Council on the status'ofthe projects.

SECTION I I. Th()J\S'!eSsl!lent is h~r~b)'.leyied for a period of30 years at the rate set forth in the City Engineer's Report>-:to::,;fund- tlie<:a~q-Gi~iti:ons, capiht(:improvements, and maintenance and servicing of those improvements as set forth in Sectiot'l'S',,,·::;: : . · · ·'

SECTioJ\r 12. For the 30 y~~~)~~ring whic~the Assessment is levied and collected: < "i~~; '~~ §2% shall be used ~~fi]'acquisitions and capital improvements, as set forth in Section 5, ':\'}i:inflationary increaser{:i)'ver 30 years and debt service, if bonds, notes or other evidences of . ':ijld~h(edness are iss~~·d. All funds collected through interest or penalties shall be available to CcN~T-:ap_{lationmy

(c) I 5% of the total assessment over 30 years shall be designated for maintenance of completed acquisitions and improvements.

SECTION 13. Pursuant to Code Sections 22620 through 22631, proceedings shall be taken for each year in which the annual assessment is to be levied. A plan shall be submitted to the City Council by the administering entity specified in Section 9 each year the annual assessment is to be levied specifYing in detail which acquisitions and improvements are planned for that year, any proposed new acquisitions and improvements, or any substantial changes in existing improvements. The City Council shall then order the City Engineer to prepare a report for consideration by City Council. The City Council shall then adopt an ordinance of intention

Referendum Ordinance K Approved by the Voters on November 5, 1996 Proposition K Text Page 3 pursuant to Code Section 22624 and provide notice of a public hearing pursuant to Code Section 22626. The City Council shall then adopt an ordinance confirming the diagram of the assessment and the assessment by June 30 of each Fiscal Year the assessment is to be levied.

SECTION 14. The City Council shall have the authority to issue bonds, notes or other evidences of indebtedness to fund all or a portion of the costs of the projects listed in Section 5 of this Ordinance. Such bonds, notes or other evidences of indebtedness may be issued in one or more series at such times and in such principal amounts as the City Council may determine in its sole discretion.

SECTION 15. (a) The Assessment for each parcel shall be collected by and be payable to the Los Angeles County Tax Collector with the general taxes levied for City and County purposes and shall be subject to the same penalties and enforcement provisions relating to general taxes or as provided in Code Section 22646. (b) If any portion of the levy, collection or expeA~itU;e o~t)le ~ssessment provided for herein is declared invalid or unconstitutional, the remaining levy, collection or expenditure shall not be affected but remain in full force and effect. · .·. · · · ·

SECTION 16. There is hereby established a special ~~d~ini the City TiiO~~\lf)Z el)titled Parks Assessment Fund (the "Fund"). All Assessments collected shall be depos,ife~'mto.the Fund and ~hall hot be subject to reversion to the Reserve Fund. Interest, which accrues in the Fund, ·'shall 're\ii~ln.in the Fund. Monies deposited into the Fund shall be expended only for park, recreation and community facilities, incidental expenses, and maintenance and servicing for the improvements. Expendituresshall be made froll) the Fund as provided in the General City Budget or by Council resolution unless provided othel'\vise by ordinance. · ",', ·.:; --.,_ : SECTION 17. In case any provision of this 8rdinance'dhi(Ifb.~ fmmd or declared invalid, illegal or unenforceable, the validity, legality and enforceability o~~~e retuaining provisions of this Ordinance shall not be affected or impaired thereby. · · · · · :>'-_\ >' <>·:___ --: SECTION 18. This Ordinance slla!l 'not take effect)i~kssWl'roved by a majority of the voters of the City voting on the matter at a general or·~P;~\'i~l election call~d<:i\y the City Council for such purpose. If so approved by the voters theDis~:ic(,and tlie Asse~sin~nt shall be deemed approved as of the date of the election, without regard to the g,ateof CE)T(ific~tig~ of the electio~ r.esult~.

Referendum Ordinance K Approved by the Voters on November 5, 1996 Proposition K Text Page 4 Attachment 10

2009-10 PROPOSITION K ASSESSMENT REPORT RESOLUTION OF INTENTION

RESOL,UiiON

A Resolution of Intention to Levy and Collect Annual Assessments for the fiscal year 2009-10 for City of Los Angeles Landscaping and Lighting District No. 96-1, pursuant to provisions of the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972 (Division 15, Part 2, Streets and Highways Code, State of California).

WHEREAS, on November 5, 1996, voters in the City of Los Angeles approved Proposition K (also known as the L.A. for Kids Program), which authorizes the formation of City of Los Angeles Landscaping and Lighting District No. 96-1 (District) and approves the levy and collection of an annual assessment of $25 million within the District for a period of thirty years for the purpose of funding the acquisition of land or land and improvements, and the development, improvement, restoration, and maintenance of improvements funded by the District, of parks, open spaces, recreation and community facilities; and

WHEREAS, the assessments proposed received approval of a majority of the voters prior to the passage of Proposition 218, therefore are exempt from the procedures and approval process set forth in Section 4 of Proposition 218; and

WHEREAS, the Los Angeles City Council on , 20_, adopted a Resolution instructing the City Engineer to prepare a report and Ordinance of Intention pursuant to the provisions of the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972; and

WHEREAS, the total net amount to be assessed to the whole District proposed for the 2009-10 fiscal year is not an increase from the amount authorized by Proposition K.

NOW, THEREFORE, THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LOS ANGELES HEREBY RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS:

Section 1. The City Council hereby declares its intention to determine that the public interest, convenience and necessity require the levy and collection of .assessments for the 2009-10 fiscal year for City of Los Angeles Landscaping and Lighting District No. 96-1, to provide funding for the acquisition of land or land and improvements, and for the development, improvement, restoration, and maintenance of improvements funded by the District, of parks, open spaces, recreation and community facilities in the District.

Sec. 2. The City Council hereby adopts, approves and confirms the Engineer's Report, which includes the L.A. for Kids Steering Committee FIVE-YEAR PLAN, LIST A, LIST B, and LIST C of the improvement projects, and the diagram for the District and the Assessment, and orders the Report be filed with the City Clerk, and sets the matter

Prepared: April 22, 2009 2009-1 0 Assessment Report Page I of4 Attachment 10

2009-10 PROPOSITION K ASSESSMENT REPORT RESOLUTION OF INTENTION for public hearing as specified in Section 8. The L.A. for Kids Steering Committee FIVE-YEAR PLAN specifies in detail which acquisitions and improvements are planned for the fiscal years 2009-10 through 2012-13, and describes the locations of the improvements to be funded by the District. LIST A of the Plan includes projects planned for fiscal year 2009-10. LIST B of the Plan includes projects that may be substituted for projects in LIST A during the fiscal year in the event it is determined by the City Council that any project in LIST A will not be implemented in the 2009-10 fiscal year. LIST C of the Plan includes competitive grant alternate projects that may be substituted for projects in LIST A during the fiscal year in the event it is determined by the City Council that any project on LIST A will not be implemented in the 2009-10 fiscal year. All projects in LIST A have been subject to environmental analysis pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), and the environmental analysis process has already been completed, or will be completed prior to adoption of the Ordinance Ordering Confirmation, Levy and Collection of Annual Assessment or as required by law. A Categorical Exemption, Environmental Impact Report, or Negative Declaration has been or is being prepared and a Notice of Exemption or Notice of Determination has been or will be filed when applicable. For projects in LIST B and LIST C, compliance with CEQA must be completed prior to the City Council approving during the 2009-10 fiscal year, the substitution of any of those projects for projects in LIST A. The Engineer's Report also describes the boundaries of the Assessment District, and the method and rationale for spreading the proposed assessment in proportion to the benefit received by each lot or parcel of land within the District. The Engineer's Report is by this reference incorporated herein as though set forth in full.

Sec. 3. The Council hereby reaffirms that the boundaries of the City of Los Angeles Landscaping and Lighting District No. 96-1 shall be coterminous with the boundaries of the City of Los Angeles. Every lot or each parcel of land within the City boundaries shall be included in the District.

Sec. 4. The Council hereby declares that the public interest, convenience, and necessity require, and that it is the intention of said Council to order, that the expense necessary for the acquisition of land or land and improvements, and for the development, improvement, restoration, and maintenance of improvements funded by the District, of parks, open spaces, recreation and community facilities including repairs, replacement, utilities, care, supervision and all other items necessary for proper maintenance and operation of the Assessment District improvements shall be assessed upon each lot or parcel of land lying within the District in proportion to the estimated benefits received from the improvements.

Sec. 5. The Council hereby declares that the amounts to be assessed for the expense of such acquisition of land or land and improvements, and of the development, improvement, restoration, and maintenance of improvements funded by the District, shall be levied and collected at the same time and in the same manner and by the same officers as County property taxes are levied and collected, all laws providing for

Prepared: April 22, 2009 2009-10 Assessment Report Page 2 of4 Attachment 10

2009-10 PROPOSITION K ASSESSMENT REPORT RESOLUTION OF INTENTION the collection and enforcement of County property taxes shall be applied to the collection and enforcement of the assessments, and all assessments collected shall be disbursed and expended for the acquisition of land or land and improvements, and for the development, improvement, restoration, and maintenance of improvements funded by the District, for parks, open spaces, recreation and community facilities in the District, all as described in the Engineer's Report.

Sec. 6. The Council hereby declares that properties owned by public agencies such as cities, the County, the State or the federal government, will not be assessed except when such property is not devoted to a public use. Rights-of-way that are owned by utilities and railroad operating rights-of-way are also exempt from assessment.

Sec. 7. The Council hereby declares that the proceedings for the levy and collection of assessments of the aforesaid District shall be taken under and in accordance with an act of the Legislature of the State of California known and designated as the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972 (Division 15, Part 2 of the Streets and Highways Code).

Sec. 8. The "Public Hearing": The day of , 2008, at the hour of 10:00 a.m., or as soon thereafter as Council business permits and on any hours and days for continued hearing as ordered by the Council, at the City Council Chambers, Room 340, City Hall, 200 North Spring Street, Los Angeles, California, is the time and place when and where any and all persons having any objections to the levy and collection of the assessments for the acquisition of land or land and improvements, and for the development, improvement, restoration, and maintenance of improvements funded by the District, of parks, open spaces, recreation and community facilities for the District may appear before the Council and show cause why the expense of the acquisition of any land or land and improvements, developing, improving, restoring, and maintaining these improvements, and the installation and construction of any facilities necessary or convenient to the District, should not be assessed against the District as described and proposed herein.

Sec. 9. Written Protest; Grounds; Withdrawal: Any interested person may, prior to the conclusion of the hearing, file a written protest with the City Clerk or, having previously filed a protest, may file a written withdrawal of that protest. A written protest shall state all grounds of objection. Protest by a property owner shall contain a description sufficient to identify the property owned by that person.

Sec. 10. The City Clerk shall cause the notice of the public hearing, in the form and manner specified in Section 6061 of the Government Code, to be published in a newspaper published at least once a week and circulated in the City of Los Angeles, which is hereby designated for that purpose. The publication of notice shall be completed at least ten days before the public hearing date.

Sec. 11. This resolution shall take effect upon its passage.

Prepared: April 22, 2009 2009-1 0 Assessment Report Page 3 of4 Attachment 10

2009-10 PROPOSITION K ASSESSMENT REPORT RESOLUTION OF INTENTION

I hereby certify that this Resolution was adopted by the Council of the City of Los Angeles at its meeting of ______

FRANK T. MARTINEZ, City Clerk

By ______~--~--- Deputy

Approved ______

File No. 07-4171

Prepared: April 22, 2009 2009-1 0 Assessment Report Page 4 of4 Attachment 11

2009-10 PROPOSITION K ASSESSMENT REPORT ORDINANCE OF INTENTION

ORDINANCE NO.~----

An Ordinance of Intention to Levy and Collect Annual Assessments for fiscal year 2009-10 for City of Los Angeles Landscaping and Lighting District No. 96-1, pursuant to provisions of the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972 (Division 15, Part 2, Streets and Highways Code, State of California).

WHEREAS, on November 5, 1996, voters in the City of Los Angeles approved Proposition K (also known as the L.A. for Kids Program), which authorizes the formation of City of Los Angeles Landscaping and Lighting District No. 96-1 (District) and approves the levy and collection of an annual assessment of $25 million within the District for a period of thirty years for the purpose of funding the acquisition of land or land and improvements, and for the development, improvement, restoration, and maintenance of improvements funded by the District, of parks, open spaces, recreation and community facilities; and

WHEREAS, the assessments proposed received approval of a majority of the voters prior to the passage of Proposition 218, therefore, are exempt from the procedures and approval process set forth in Section 4 of Proposition 218; and

WHEREAS, the Los Angeles City Council on September 23, 2008, adopted a Resolution instructing the City Engineer to prepare a report and Ordinance of Intention pursuant to the provisions of the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972; and

WHEREAS, the total net amount to be assessed to the whole District proposed for the 2009-10 fiscal year is not an increase from the amount authorized by Proposition K.

NOW, THEREFORE,

THE PEOPLE OF THE CITY OF LOS ANGELES DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:

Section 1. The City Council hereby declares its intention to determine that the ·public interest, convenience and necessity require the levy and collection of assessments for the 2009-10 fiscal year for City of Los Angeles Landscaping and Lighting District No. 96-1, to provide funding for the acquisition of land or land and improvements, and for the development, improvement, restoration, and maintenance of improvements funded by the District, of parks, open spaces, recreation and community facilities in the District.

Sec. 2. The City Council hereby adopts, approves and confirms the Engineer's Report, which includes the L.A. for Kids Steering Committee FIVE-YEAR PLAN, LIST A,

LIST B, and LIST C of the improvement projects, and the diagram for the District and the

Prepared: April 22, 2009 2009-1 0 Assessment Report Page 1 of 4 Attachment 11

2009-10 PROPOSITION K ASSESSMENT REPORT ORDINANCE OF INTENTION

Assessment, and orders the Report be filed with the City Clerk, and sets the matter for public hearing as specified in Section 8. The L.A. for Kids Steering Committee FIVE-YEAR PLAN specifies in detail which acquisitions and improvements are planned for the fiscal years 2009-10 through 2013-14, and describes the locations of the improvements to be funded by the District. LIST A of the Plan includes projects planned for fiscal year 2009- 10. LIST B of the Plan includes projects that may be substituted for projects in LIST A during the fiscal year in the event it is determined by the City Council that any project in LIST A will not be implemented in the 2009-10 fiscal year. LIST C of the Plan includes competitive grant alternate projects that may be substituted for projects in LIST A during the fiscal year in the event it is determined by the City Council that any project on LIST A will not be implemented in the 2009-10 fiscal year. All projects in LIST A have been subject to environmental analysis pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), and the environmental analysis process has already been completed, or will be completed prior to adoption of the Ordinance Ordering Confirmation, Levy and Collection of Annual Assessment or as required by law. A Categorical Exemption, Environmental Impact Report, or Negative Declaration has been or is being prepared and a Notice of Exemption or Notice of Determination has been or will be filed when applicable. For projects in LIST Band LIST C, compliance with CEQA must be completed prior to the City Council approving during the 2009-10 fiscal year, the substitution of any of those projects for projects in LIST A. The Engineer's Report also describes the boundaries of the Assessment District, and the method and rationale for spreading the proposed assessment in proportion to the benefit received by each lot or parcel of land within the District. The Engineer's Report is by this reference incorporated herein as though set forth in full.

Sec. 3. The Council hereby reaffirms that the boundaries of the City of Los Angeles Landscaping and Lighting District No. 96-1 shall be coterminous with the boundaries ofthe City of Los Angeles. Every lot or each parcel of land within the City boundaries shall be included in the District. ·

Sec. 4. The Council hereby declares that the public interest, convenience, and necessity require, and that it is the intention of said Council to order, that the expense necessary for the acquisition of land or land and improvements, and for the development, improvement, restoration, and maintenance of improvements funded by the District, of parks, open spaces, recreation and community facilities including repairs, replacement, utilities, care, supervision and all other items necessary for proper maintenance and operation of the Assessment District improvements shall be assessed upon each lot or ·parcel of land lying within the District in proportion to the estimated benefits received from the improvements.

Sec. 5. The Council hereby declares that the amounts to be assessed for the expense of such acquisition of land or land and improvements, and of the development, improvement, restoration, and maintenance of improvements funded by the District, shall be levied and collected at the same time and in the same manner and by the same officers as County property taxes are levied and collected, all laws providing for the collection and enforcement of County property taxes shall be applied to the collection and enforcement of

Prepared: April 22, 2009 2009-1 0 Assessment Report Page 2 of 4 Attachment 11

2009-10 PROPOSITION K ASSESSMENT REPORT ORDINANCE OF INTENTION the assessments, and all assessments collected shall be disbursed and expended for the acquisition of land or land and improvements, and for the development, improvement, restoration, and maintenance of improvements funded by the District, for parks, open spaces, recreation and community facilities in the District, all as described in the Engineer's Report.

Sec. 6. The Council hereby declares that properties owned by public agencies such as cities, the County, the State or the federal government, will not be assessed except when such property is not devoted to a public use. Rights-of-way that are owned by utilities and railroad operating rights-of-way are also exempt from assessment.

Sec. 7. The Council hereby declares that the proceedings for the levy and collection of assessments of the aforesaid District shall be taken under and in accordance with an act of the Legislature of the State of California known and designated as the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972 (Division 15, Part 2 of the Streets and Highways Code).

Sec. 8. The "Public Hearing": The day of June 3, 2009, at the hour of 10:00 a.m., or as soon thereafter as Council business permits and on any hours and days for continued hearing as ordered by the Council, at the City Council Chambers, Room 340, City Hall, 200 North Spring Street, Los Angeles, California, is the time and place when and where any and all persons having any objections to the levy and collection of the assessments for the acquisition of land or land and improvements, and for the development, improvement, restoration, and maintenance of improvements funded by the District, of parks, open spaces, recreation and community facilities for the District may appear before the Council and show cause why the expense of the acquisition of any land or land and improvements, developing, improving, restoring, and maintaining these improvements, and the installation and construction of any facilities necessary or convenient to the District, should not be assessed against the District as described and proposed herein.

Sec. 9. Written Protest; Grounds; Withdrawal: Any interested person may, prior to the conclusion of the hearing, file a written protest with the City Clerk or, having previously filed a protest, may file a written withdrawal of that protest. A written protest shall state all grounds of objection. Protest by a property owner shall contain a description sufficient to identify the property owned by that person.

Sec. 10. The City Clerk shall cause the notice of the public hearing, in the form and manner specified in Section 6061 of the Government Code, to be published in a newspaper published at least once a week and circulated in the City of Los Angeles, which is hereby designated for that purpose. The publication of notice shall be completed at least ten days before the public hearing date.

Prepared: April 22, 2009 2009-1 0 Assessment Report Page 3 of 4 Attachment 11

2009-10 PROPOSITION K ASSESSMENT REPORT ORDINANCE OF INTENTION

Sec. 11. The City Clerk shall certify to the passage of this ordinance and have it published in accordance with Council policy, either in a daily newspaper circulated in the City of Los Angeles or by posting for ten days in three public places in the City of Los Angeles: one copy on the bulletin board located at the Main Street entrance to the Los Angeles City Hall; one copy on the bulletin board located at the Main Street entrance to the Los Angeles City Hall East; and one copy on the bulletin board located at the Temple Street entrance to the Los Angeles County Hall of Records.

I hereby certify that this ordinance was passed by the Council of the City of Los Angeles at its meeting of------

KAREN E. KALFAYAN, City Clerk

By ______~--~--- Deputy

Approved ______

Mayor

Approved as to Form and Legality:

ROCKARD J. DELGADILLO, City Attorney

By ______MARCIA GONZALES-KIMBROUGH Deputy City Attorney

Date ______

File No. 08-2139

Prepared: April 22, 2009 2009-1 0 Assessment Report Page 4 of4 Attachment 12 PROPOSITION K: 2009-10 L.A. FOR KIDS PROGRAM YEAR 12 REPROGRAMMING RECOMMENDATIONS

IIIIVt: PROJECTS

L..P..USD:MARSHALL HS TRACK EXPANSION (6th 4 TRACK EXPANSION $700,3301 IIAccelerated project. II $108,0051 I I II $808,3351 I I I Cycle) CONSTRUCTION OF 3 REG & PARKS: SOCCER FIELDS (2 WITH SHELDON ARLETA (4th UGHTS), 2 BASEBALL ~~ ~~Onhold due to State cycle) Includes 6 FIELDS SECURITY LIGHTING $400,0001 I I I II I $400,000! I I suspension of grant reprogrammed funds of PARKING IRRIGATION, $203,878. DRINKING FOUNTAINS FENCl

LANL T: FOX & LAUREL ACQUISITION AND Accelerated project. CANYON PARK (6th 7 DEVELOPMENT OF VACANT $240,000 $245,128 $485,128 Acquisition is ready to Cycle) PROPERTY INTO PARK proceed in the current year.

REG & PARKS: EL DORADO ACQUISITION 7 ACQUIS1TION $500,000 $500,000 Delayed acquisition. ·- sed 6th Cvclel

REPLACE INFIELDS, Delayed LEVEURESEED OUTFIELD, construction can occur at & IREC PARKS: REPLACE IRRIGATION the s< CHATSWORTH PARK $248,283 $248,283 112 SYSTEM, REPLACE FENCE Park South project, for NORTH (6th Cycle) FABRIC, NEW BLEACHERS, purposes of achieving cost DRINKING FOUNTAINS

I~EC& PARKS: EAST DEVELOPMENT OF Accelerated project. Year WILMINGTON SOFTBALL, SOCCER FIELD, 12 funds are for preliminary 15 $100,000 $900,000 $100,000 $100,000 $800,000 GREENBELT PARK (5th PLAYAREA AND RELATED design and negotiation of cycle) AMENITIES. land acquis

Accelerated prOject, with WILMINGTON BOYS & INTERIOR AND EXTERIOR 15 $278,080 $278,080 construction close to GIRLS CLUB (6th Cycle) IMPROVEMENTS

PROJECTS

:SUGt..:t.K l:UMI-'Lt:.X, RV IPARK.- .. ·---

S1AII~ CENTER, ROAD/TRAIL Accelerated project, ready I IMPROVEMENTS, FEN( HANSEN DAM 11$1,7oo.ooo 1 $3,2oo.oool $2,622,32( II $4,9oo,oo $50,oool $1 oo,oool $218,37( ~oproceed with construction I (YR 4&5: SOCCEF< m current year. II COMPLEX, YR 7:

PR.ED···E· ...V ELOPMENT FOR IFUI!JRE SCOPE)

2009-10 Assessment Report Prepared: April 22, 2009 Page 1 of 3 Attachment 12 PROPOSITION K: 2009-10 L.A. FOR KIDS PROGRAM YEAR 12 REPROGRAMMING RECOMMENDATIONS

Q-F-i\i~ vP.ar-Pf3n.-A.iJoC8iiQriS_-;_ '·:~~£(;-~ffie~~J'~d:-_;~d~~~-~;

o.·-0}; · --/~<~;­ j·;;ll$~wt~~~~i~~~~~8 " YR12 I YR13 I YR14 YR· YR16 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 I 2oo12-13 Accelerated project. I $2oo.ooq\ $2oo.ooc Funding will be used for IIenvironmental review.

LA.ND ACQUISITION, GREENING ALONG AREA Of reject in design. ENCINO, SHERMAN OAKS, LOS ANGELES Constructionfunding movec REG STUDIO CITY (YR 7: $700,000/ $600,0< $50,000 $692,8571 $1,352,5041 $300,0( RIVERFRONT PARK I into later years to balance / r r.o~~~=r..rT,YR 8: the expenditure plan. I;,;;~~-~~.;1 N:;;:. l::l- , •. ' ~ ~UCTIQN)

"'~'-'ruH; t" • 11CNIC AND RESTROOM lion hold due to State !sEPULVEDA BASIN IREG\ FACILITIES; SOCCER FIELD $1,236,376/ $1 ,ooo,ooo/$1, 136,30~ $50,0001 $1,950,0001 $1 ,587,95E ion of grant DEVELOPMENT (YR 7: lements

IOUTDOOR REFURBISHMENT INCLUDING ATHLETIC AND Project in design. PICNIC FACILITIES, Construction funding movec luNCOLN PARK 1 I ROADWAYS, RESTROOMS, $250,oool $250,00l $100,201 $408,551 into later years to balance EROSION CONTROL, the expenditure plan. IRRIGATION {YR 8: ATHLETIC AND PICNIC FACILITIES, ROADWAY PROPERTY ACQUISITION ~UNYONCANYON PAR!< 4 $100,0001 ~1nnnnr $100,0001 4:? no? ?nr ~1nnnnnl $100.oool c;:1nn acquisition. FOR PARK reject ir /EROSION AND DRAINAGE Construction funding movec rWATTLES PARK 4 :ll:L4!:1_87! $100,00( $399,875 IMPROVEMENTS into later years to balance the expenditure plan. !! Project is currently in design. Remaining funds REFURBISH, RETROFIT AN[ are moved to later years to MANCHESTERJR.ARTSI 8 CONVERT CITY BUILDING <7< $50,00( $100,00( coincide with the award of CENTER {Vision Theatre) I INTO A JR. ARTS CENTER the construction contract forYr 13 (FY

FRED KVt:H:.K I::::; RECREATION CENTER {Yr12rer lf"r\1\IC::TRUC" --·-·-·--project, with includes; 9 RECREATION CENTER (YR II I $1,450,671 1struct constract awardee balance of $796 but 8: PREDEVELOPMENT, YR fl· $1,249,8751 ~?nnnnr jlfor the current year. excludes project inflation DESIGN) award of $938,088 (C. F. 09-0444 II

2009-10 Assessment Report Prepared: April 22, 2009 Page 2 of3 Attachment 12 PROPOSITION K: 2009-10 L.A. FOR KIDS PROGRAM YEAR 12 REPROGRAMMING RECOMMENDATIONS

~~~l~§i~S~~~b

_::~);.-:::x~-c-:

OUTDOOR PARK Delayed due to site LHA I :::iVVUKI H PARK 12 DEVELOPMENT, PARKING $199,875 $500,000 $199,875 $500,000 contamination. I SOUTH LOT IMPROVEMENTS IMPROVEMENTS TO Project in. I LASORDA FIELD OF 13 ATHLETIC FIELDS, $ 149 B?S $BSO OOO $49,875 $200,000 $350,000 $400,000 Constructi g moved FIELDHOUSE, & ' ' llinto icm::1 y• RESTROOMS liT! ON AND Funding move into later DEVELOPMENT OF LAND 'VIRGIL VILLAGE 13 $250,000] $479,2931 $471 years. Acquisition is not FOR SOCCER FIELD (YR 6: IIcurrently ready to proceed . !. rr.f II<::ITII'll\1\

REFURBISHMENT TO Project in design. INCLUDE LIGHTING, NEW Construction funding movec !ARROYO SECO 14 $300,000] $250,00( $199,87f $50,0001 $500,000 $199,87~ PLAY EQUIPMENT IN AREA into later years to balance CLOSE TO RESIDENTS, the expenditure plan. -~~-- ·-·-· = TOTALS $200,001 ~

2009-10 Assessment Report Prepared: April 22, 2009 Page 3 of3