DOCSLIB.ORG

Improving Food Security in Azerbaijan, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan and Tajikistan

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Improving Food Security in Azerbaijan, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan and Tajikistan IMPROVING FOOD SECURITY IN AZERBAIJAN, KAZAKHSTAN, KYRGYZSTAN AND TAJIKISTAN The agricultural sector in Azerbaijan, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan and Tajikistan is responsible for 20–50 percent of the population's livelihoods. While the global cultivation of genetically modified (GM) crops is increasing, the authorization for cultivation or import of these crops as food and feed stuffs is not harmonized between countries and is becoming increasingly more complex despite the international agreements, such as the Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety (CPB). Additionally, the necessary expertise and facilities for comprehensive assessment and management of risks, related to genetically modified organisms, was lacking in all four countries. This project developed capacities in all four countries, implemented the international obligations and ensured decent livelihoods and food security in rural areas through increased agricultural production. ©FAO/Vyacheslav Oseledko WHAT DID THE PROJECT DO? KEY FACTS Guidance, training and technical support were provided to a critical Contribution mass of stakeholders from Azerbaijan, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan and USD 494 000 Tajikistan. Training courses and workshops provided an adequate legislative bases in biosafety, appropriate institutional mechanisms Duration and infrastructure to enforce them, well-trained human resources at October 2015 – December 2017 all levels, easy access to relevant information and informed and coherent actions of institutions and stakeholders. The project Resource Partner FAO addressed and developed regional and country capacities in genome editing and other emerging frontier biotechnologies, and it prepared a Partners follow-up project proposal to enlarge and sustain the results. Capacity Ministry of Agriculture of the Republic development of the national institutions in Azerbaijan and Tajikistan of Azerbaijan; Committee of was strengthened through involvement in project activities on which Environmental Protection under implementing partners worked together with international experts the Government of the Republic and FAO technical guidance. Additionally, a significant number of Tajikistan; Ministry of Agriculture of partnerships were established among Ministries, academia of the Republic of Kazakhstan; and and extension service providers, among others. the State Agency of Environment Protection and Forestry of the Kyrgyz IMPACT Republic The critical mass of experts that were trained in Azerbaijan, Beneficiaries Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan and Tajikistan resulted in a 180 percent Officials in the Ministries, food safety agencies, inspectorates, extension increase of the number of national stakeholders able to apply services, biosafety committees, rural biosafety knowledge, which is key for the effective implementation poor and consumers of national biosafety frameworks. Through increased agriculture productivity, the income of the rural population and food security will be improved in a sustainable and environmentally friendly manner that preserves local biodiversity. ACTIVITIES . 42 participants attended training workshops on biosafety regulations and biotechnology and biosafety policy GOALS development. 29 participants were trained in genetically modified risk analysis, monitoring and inspections. 40 participants attended biosafety training on general and country-specific issues in Azerbaijan and Tajikistan. A training course was conducted on inspections, border controls, and emergency response to enforce biosafety laws. A training course was conducted in genetically modified organism detection, identification and quantification and laboratory accreditation. A training course was conducted on risk communication, public DEVELOPMENT SUSTAINABLE awareness and participation, Biosafety Clearing House (BCH), biosafety curricula formulation development and updates, national awareness raising and communication. Information packages and practical manuals were provided to all workshop participants containing guidelines and tools on risk assessment, risk management, monitoring genetically modified organisms, general surveillance, inspections and emergency response. A draft project document was prepared for a larger project on biosafety that will be funded by the Global Environment Facility (GEF) and will address the most pressing regional needs in biosafety. ©FAO/Vyacheslav Oseledko ©FAO/Oleksandra Novgorodova Project Code TCP/SEC/3502 Project Title Capacity development in biosafety Contacts FAO Sub regional Office for Central Asia [email protected] Nevena Alexandrova (Lead Technical Officer) [email protected] Resource Mobilization Division Marketing, Outreach and Reporting Unit [email protected].
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Tajikistan Asht Iran China Afghanistan Khujand
    Mongolia Uzbekistan Kyrgyzstan Tu rkmenistan T a jikistan Tajikistan Asht Iran China Afghanistan Khujand Pakistan Nepal Bhutan Oman Arabian Bangladesh Sea India Burma ajikistan is a landlocked country in Central Tha Asia with a population of 7 million, and Ind i a n Ocean Rasht Sri Lanka a per capita income of US$410 a year, or Vahdat justT more than US$1 a day. The economy, which has TA JIKISTAN Dushanbe been growing an annual average at 8 percent during Norak 2000-06, depends heavily on exports of cotton and aluminum, and on growing remittances of its citizens in Russia. Poverty, although declining, remains alarmingly high. In 2005, almost six of every 10 Kumsangir people in Tajikistan live in extreme poverty. Current Build Sites Tajikistan remains the poorest and most economically fragile of the former Soviet countries. Since 1991, Tajikistan has experienced high levels of emigration, motivated by COUNTRY FACTS war following independence and, lately, by economic factors. Labor migrants’ remittances have played an important role as one of the drivers of Tajikistan’s robust Population: 7,211,884 (July 2008 est.) ........................................................... economic growth during the past several years. The volume of official remittances Capital: Dushanbe has significantly increased since 2001 and was estimated at $1.5 billion (36 percent ........................................................... of GDP) in 2007. Area: 55,251 sq miles .......................................................... Ethnic groups: Tajik 79.9%, Uzbek Due to armed conflict and ensuing economic collapse, housebuilding 15.3%, Russian 1.1%, Kyrgyz 1.1%, in Tajikistan has all but come to a halt. Unfinished homes are scattered across Tajikistan while existing housing stock deteriorates due to neglect.
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Research Division Country Profile: Tajikistan, January 2007
    Library of Congress – Federal Research Division Country Profile: Tajikistan, January 2007 COUNTRY PROFILE: TAJIKISTAN January 2007 COUNTRY Formal Name: Republic of Tajikistan (Jumhurii Tojikiston). Short Form: Tajikistan. Term for Citizen(s): Tajikistani(s). Capital: Dushanbe. Other Major Cities: Istravshan, Khujand, Kulob, and Qurghonteppa. Independence: The official date of independence is September 9, 1991, the date on which Tajikistan withdrew from the Soviet Union. Public Holidays: New Year’s Day (January 1), International Women’s Day (March 8), Navruz (Persian New Year, March 20, 21, or 22), International Labor Day (May 1), Victory Day (May 9), Independence Day (September 9), Constitution Day (November 6), and National Reconciliation Day (November 9). Flag: The flag features three horizontal stripes: a wide middle white stripe with narrower red (top) and green stripes. Centered in the white stripe is a golden crown topped by seven gold, five-pointed stars. The red is taken from the flag of the Soviet Union; the green represents agriculture and the white, cotton. The crown and stars represent the Click to Enlarge Image country’s sovereignty and the friendship of nationalities. HISTORICAL BACKGROUND Early History: Iranian peoples such as the Soghdians and the Bactrians are the ethnic forbears of the modern Tajiks. They have inhabited parts of Central Asia for at least 2,500 years, assimilating with Turkic and Mongol groups. Between the sixth and fourth centuries B.C., present-day Tajikistan was part of the Persian Achaemenian Empire, which was conquered by Alexander the Great in the fourth century B.C. After that conquest, Tajikistan was part of the Greco-Bactrian Kingdom, a successor state to Alexander’s empire.
    [Show full text]
  • DISASTER RESPONSE COORDINATION UNIT Kyrgyzstan: COVID-19 Response
    DISASTER RESPONSE COORDINATION UNIT Kyrgyzstan: COVID-19 response Weekly situation update Date: 22 May 2020 Key statistics As of 22 May 2020 Total cases Total number of 1350 1600 confirmed cases of 1400 1350 COVID-19 1200 1111 1000 The number of new 37 906 cases from total 800 756 656 600 554 The number of human 14 400 419 losses 200 147216 0 The number of 949 recovered cases On 18 March 2020 the first three cases were recorded in the Kyrgyz Republic that were detected among those, who returned from Umra pilgrimage to Saudi Arabia. Kyrgyzstan’s Security Council recommended the state of emergency on 22 March, and the Government subsequently imposed stricter measures, placing checkpoints in every region and city, and shutting down facilities (cafes, cinemas, shopping malls, and other entertainment places), leaving only grocery stores, food markets, pharmacies, and medical Daily trend of COVID-19 new Confirmed cases facilities. as of 22 May 2020 As of 22 May 2020, 1,350 cases of COVID-19 100 have been confirmed in the Kyrgyz Republic 80 and 14 deaths. Please also see in the table age disaggregation among the confirmed 60 cases as of 15 May 2020. Out of total 40 confirmed cases: cases among women- 685 (51%), cases among men – 665 (49%). 20 Number of laboratory test in the last day - 2 . 0 The number of contacts with laboratory- confirmed patients with covid-19 is 6,600 and 2,150 people are on observation. The emergency state was expired on 10 May, but it was decided to leave the emergency regime and quarantine in Bishkek and Osh cities, in At-Bashi district of the Naryn region and in the rural district of Kanysh-Kiya Chatkal district of the Jalal-Abad region.
    [Show full text]
  • Central Asia: Confronting Independence
    THE JAMES A. BAKER III INSTITUTE FOR PUBLIC POLICY OF RICE UNIVERSITY UNLOCKING THE ASSETS: ENERGY AND THE FUTURE OF CENTRAL ASIA AND THE CAUCASUS CENTRAL ASIA: CONFRONTING INDEPENDENCE MARTHA BRILL OLCOTT SENIOR RESEARCH ASSOCIATE CARNEGIE ENDOWMENT FOR INTERNATIONAL PEACE PREPARED IN CONJUNCTION WITH AN ENERGY STUDY BY THE CENTER FOR INTERNATIONAL POLITICAL ECONOMY AND THE JAMES A. BAKER III INSTITUTE FOR PUBLIC POLICY RICE UNIVERSITY – APRIL 1998 CENTRAL ASIA: CONFRONTING INDEPENDENCE Introduction After the euphoria of gaining independence settles down, the elites of each new sovereign country inevitably stumble upon the challenges of building a viable state. The inexperienced governments soon venture into unfamiliar territory when they have to formulate foreign policy or when they try to forge beneficial economic ties with foreign investors. What often proves especially difficult is the process of redefining the new country's relationship with its old colonial ruler or federation partners. In addition to these often-encountered hurdles, the newly independent states of Central Asia-- Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, Turkmenistan, and Uzbekistan-- have faced a host of particular challenges. Some of these emanate from the Soviet legacy, others--from the ethnic and social fabric of each individual polity. Yet another group stems from the peculiarities of intra- regional dynamics. Finally, the fledgling states have been struggling to step out of their traditional isolation and build relations with states outside of their neighborhood. This paper seeks to offer an overview of all the challenges that the Central Asian countries have confronted in the process of consolidating their sovereignty. The Soviet Legacy and the Ensuing Internal Challenges What best distinguishes the birth of the Central Asian states from that of any other sovereign country is the incredible weakness of pro-independence movements throughout the region.
    [Show full text]
  • COVID-19 in Kyrgyzstan Found Over 2 Million Contracted Coronavirus by August
    Electronic supplementary material: The online version of this article contains supplementary material. © 2021 The Author(s) Cite as: Dzushupov K, Lucero-Prisno III DE, Vishnyakov D, Lin X, Ahmadi A. JoGH © 2021 ISGH COVID-19 in Kyrgyzstan: Navitating a way out. J Glob Health 2021;11:03020. COVID-19 in Kyrgyzstan: Navigating a way out VIEWPOINTS Kenesh Dzushupov1*, Don Eliseo Lucero-Prisno III2,3*, Dmitry Vishnyakov1*, Xu Lin4*, Attaullah Ahmadi5,6* 1Department of Public Health, International School of Medicine, Bishkek, Kyrgyzstan 2Department of Global Health and Development, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom 3Faculty of Management and Development Studies, University of the Philippines (Open University), Los Baños, Laguna, Philippines 4Department of Thoracic Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, PR China 5Medical Research Center, Kateb University, Kabul, Afghanistan 6Global Health Focus Asia, Kabul, Afghanistan *Equal authorship. he COVID-19 pandemic is the greatest global health crisis of our time [1]. Since the pandemic started in China, in December 2019, the disease has been creeping into almost every country across the globe T[2,3]. The pandemic has led to a global cumulative incident of 47 901 761 confirmed cases, and 1 221 479 deaths by November 4, 2020 [4]. The first case of COVID-19 in Kyrgyzstan, a mountainous land-lock country in Central Asia, was detected on March 18, 2020 [5]. Thereafter the country was plagued with the pandemic and went through a lockdown, declaration of state of emergency, steady case increase and devastating peak of the wave with total 60 279 confirmed cases, 1159 deaths and 51 288 recoveries across the country by Novem- ber 4, 2020 [4].
    [Show full text]
  • Agreement Between the Government of Republic of Tajikistan and the Government of the United Arab Emirates for the Promotion and Protection of Investments
    Agreement between the Government of Republic of Tajikistan and the Government of the United Arab Emirates for the Promotion and Protection of Investments The Government of the Republic of Tajikistan and the Government of the United Arab Emirates ( both countries hereinafter collectively referred to as the Contracting Parties and each referred to as a Contracting Party).; Desiring to create favourable conditions for greater economic cooperation between them and particularly for investments by investors of one Contracting Party in the territory of the other Contracting Party. Recognizing that the reciprocal protection of such investments will be conductive to the stimulation of business initiative and will increase prosperity in both Contracting Parties. Have agreed as follows:- Article 1. Definitions For the purpose of this Agreement:- (1) The term "investment" shall comprise every kind of asset invested by the Government or by a natural or legal person of one Contracting Party in the territory of the other Contracting Party in accordance with the laws, regulations and administrative practices of that Contracting Party. Without restricting the generality of the forgoing the term "investment" shall include: (a) Movable and immovable property as well as any other property rights in rem such as mortgages, liens, pledges, usufruct and similar rights; (b) Shares, stocks and debentures of companies or other rights or interests in such companies, loans related to investments and bonds issued by a Contracting Party or any of its natural or legal
    [Show full text]
  • Preventing Violent Extremism in Kyrgyzstan
    UNITED STATES INSTITUTE OF PEACE www.usip.org SPECIAL REPORT 2301 Constitution Ave., NW • Washington, DC 20037 • 202.457.1700 • fax 202.429.6063 ABOUT THE REPORT Jacob Zenn and Kathleen Kuehnast This report offers perspectives on the national and regional dynamics of violent extremism with respect to Kyrgyzstan. Derived from a study supported by the United States Institute of Peace (USIP) to explore the potential for violent extremism in Central Asia, it is based on extensive interviews and a Preventing Violent countrywide Peace Game with university students at Kyrgyz National University in June 2014. Extremism in Kyrgyzstan ABOUT THE AUTHORS Jacob Zenn is an analyst on Eurasian and African affairs, a legal adviser on international law and best practices related to civil society and freedom of association, and a nonresident research Summary fellow at the Center of Shanghai Cooperation Organization Studies in China, the Center of Security Programs in Kazakhstan, • Kyrgyzstan, having twice overthrown autocratic leaders in violent uprisings, in 2005 and again and The Jamestown Foundation in Washington, DC. Dr. Kathleen in 2010, is the most politically open and democratic country in Central Asia. Kuehnast is a sociocultural anthropologist and an expert on • Many Kyrgyz observers remain concerned about the country’s future. They fear that underlying Kyrgyzstan, where she conducted field work in the early 1990s. An adviser on the Central Asia Fellows Program at the socioeconomic conditions and lack of public services—combined with other factors, such as Elliott School of International Affairs at George Washington drug trafficking from Afghanistan, political manipulation, regional instability in former Soviet University, she is a member of the Council on Foreign Union countries and Afghanistan, and foreign-imported religious ideologies—create an envi- Relations and has directed the Center for Gender and ronment in which violent extremism can flourish.
    [Show full text]
  • The Kyrgyzstan-Uzbekistan Border: a Legacy of Soviet Imperialism
    Undergraduate Journal of Global Citizenship Volume 4 Issue 1 Article 4 6-1-2021 The Kyrgyzstan-Uzbekistan Border: A Legacy of Soviet Imperialism Liam Abbate Santa Clara University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.fairfield.edu/jogc Recommended Citation Abbate, Liam (2021) "The Kyrgyzstan-Uzbekistan Border: A Legacy of Soviet Imperialism," Undergraduate Journal of Global Citizenship: Vol. 4 : Iss. 1 , Article 4. Available at: https://digitalcommons.fairfield.edu/jogc/vol4/iss1/4 This item has been accepted for inclusion in DigitalCommons@Fairfield by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@Fairfield. It is brought to you by DigitalCommons@Fairfield with permission from the rights- holder(s) and is protected by copyright and/or related rights. You are free to use this item in any way that is permitted by the copyright and related rights legislation that applies to your use. For other uses, you need to obtain permission from the rights-holder(s) directly, unless additional rights are indicated by a Creative Commons license in the record and/or on the work itself. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Abbate: The Kyrgyzstan-Uzbekistan Border: A Legacy of Soviet Imperialism dispute, particularly in relation to the U.S.- The Kyrgyzstan- China rivalry. Uzbekistan Border: Background A Legacy of Soviet Kyrgyzstan is among the poorest of the nations of Central Asia: its per capita is a Imperialism mere tenth of its larger neighbor LIAM ABBATE Kazakhstan.1 Formerly a constituent republic of the Union of the Soviet Socialist Republics, the Kirghiz Soviet Socialist Republic declared independence as Abstract Kyrgyzstan on August 31, 1991.
    [Show full text]
  • Engaging Central Asia
    ENGAGING CENTRAL ASIA ENGAGING CENTRAL ASIA THE EUROPEAN UNION’S NEW STRATEGY IN THE HEART OF EURASIA EDITED BY NEIL J. MELVIN CONTRIBUTORS BHAVNA DAVE MICHAEL DENISON MATTEO FUMAGALLI MICHAEL HALL NARGIS KASSENOVA DANIEL KIMMAGE NEIL J. MELVIN EUGHENIY ZHOVTIS CENTRE FOR EUROPEAN POLICY STUDIES BRUSSELS The Centre for European Policy Studies (CEPS) is an independent policy research institute based in Brussels. Its mission is to produce sound analytical research leading to constructive solutions to the challenges facing Europe today. The views expressed in this report are those of the authors writing in a personal capacity and do not necessarily reflect those of CEPS or any other institution with which the authors are associated. This study was carried out in the context of the broader work programme of CEPS on European Neighbourhood Policy, which is generously supported by the Compagnia di San Paolo and the Open Society Institute. ISBN-13: 978-92-9079-707-4 © Copyright 2008, Centre for European Policy Studies. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means – electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise – without the prior permission of the Centre for European Policy Studies. Centre for European Policy Studies Place du Congrès 1, B-1000 Brussels Tel: 32 (0) 2 229.39.11 Fax: 32 (0) 2 219.41.51 e-mail: [email protected] internet: http://www.ceps.eu CONTENTS 1. Introduction Neil J. Melvin ................................................................................................. 1 2. Security Challenges in Central Asia: Implications for the EU’s Engagement Strategy Daniel Kimmage............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • By Eliza Taitelieva
    Kyrgyzstan: The Challenge of Post-Soviet Multiethnic Nation Building By Eliza Taitelieva Submitted to the graduate degree program in Global and International Studies and the Graduate Faculty of the University of Kansas in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts ________________________________ Chairperson John Kennedy ________________________________ Committee member Mike Wuthrich ________________________________ Committee member Mark Joslyn Date Defended: 5/18/15 The Thesis Committee for Eliza Taitelieva certifies that this is the approved version of the following thesis: Kyrgyzstan: The Challenge of Post-Soviet Multiethnic Nation Building ________________________________ Chairperson John Kennedy Date approved: 5/18/15 ii Abstract The thesis attempts to understand why it is difficult to establish peace and stability in Kyrgyzstan; to determine how to establish interethnic and cultural harmony; Understanding the importance of ethnic and national identities and their dynamics also helps to clarify potential problems such as separatism and conflict, which are likely to recur in the future. The World Bank Data Survey from 2004 is used to investigate different variables in which the presence of significant influences (ethnicity, citizenship, education, territory) on building national identity. It also elucidates the ongoing debates of ethnic division in the development of national identity and its challenges. The first significant trend was the fact that ethnic Kyrgyz are more apt to prioritize the importance
    [Show full text]
  • Kazakhstan and the Kyrgyz Republic: Almaty-Bishkek Regional Road Rehabilitation Project
    ASIAN DEVELOPMENT BANK Independent Evaluation Department PROJECT PERFORMANCE EVALUATION REPORT ON KAZAKHSTAN AND THE KYRGYZ REPUBLIC: ALMATY-BISHKEK REGIONAL ROAD REHABILITATION PROJECT In this electronic file, the report is followed by Management’s response, and the Board of Directors’ Development Effectiveness Committee (DEC) Chair’s summary of a discussion of the report by DEC. Performance Evaluation Report Project Numbers: 29568 and 32463 Loan Numbers: 1774 and 1775 Project Performance Evaluation Report (Joint Report) March 2009 Kazakhstan and the Kyrgyz Republic: Almaty– Bishkek Regional Road Rehabilitation Project This joint evaluation report was prepared by the Independent Evaluation Department of the Asian Development Bank and the Evaluation Department of the European Bank for Reconstruction and Development. CURRENCY EQUIVALENTS Asian Development Bank Currency Unit (Kazakhstan) – tenge (T) At Appraisal At Project Completion At Operations Evaluation (August 2000) (October 2007) (August 2008) T1.00 = $0.0070 $0.0082 $0.0084 $1.00 = T142.400 T120.855 T119.680 Currency Unit (Kyrgyz Republic) – som (Som) At Appraisal At Project Completion At Operations Evaluation (August 2000) (October 2007) (August 2008) Som1.00 = $0.0208 $0.02895 $0.0289 $1.00 = Som47.990 Som34.540 Som34.560 European Bank for Reconstruction and Development Currency Unit (Kazakhstan) – tenge (KZT) At Appraisal (October 2000) $1 = €1.17 $1 = KZT (tenge)144 ABBREVIATIONS ADB – Asian Development Bank BME – benefit monitoring and evaluation CAREC – Central Asia Regional
    [Show full text]
  • Politics of Ports China's Investments in Pakistan, Sri Lanka & Bangladesh
    Politics of ports China’s investments in Pakistan, Sri Lanka & Bangladesh Thilini Kahandawaarachchi A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts in International Studies: South Asia University of Washington 2015 Committee: Sunila Kale Anand Yang Program Authorized to Offer Degree: The Henry M. Jackson School of International Studies © Copyright 2015 Thilini Kahandawaarachchi ii University of Washington Abstract Politics of ports China’s investments in Pakistan, Sri Lanka & Bangladesh Thilini Kahandawaarachchi Chair of the Supervisory Committee: Dr. Sunila Kale South Asia Studies Department Over the last decade China has heavily invested in deep-water ports in Pakistan, Sri Lanka and Bangladesh. Many scholars explain these investments in light of China’s economic expansion and long-term strategic goals. However, scholars have not paid enough attention to the rationale for recipient countries to encourage and even actively seek Chinese investments. This thesis will examine the rationale behind the governments of Pakistan, Sri Lanka and Bangladesh for involving China to build their maritime infrastructure. Firstly, I argue that these countries consider China to be a favourable alternative to funding from international financial institutions and Western donors that usually have numerous conditionalities when extending development loans. Secondly, I argue that South Asian countries around India perceive China as a counter balance against the regional hegemony of India. Further, China is also a useful friend to these South Asian countries to resist the influence of external powers and international organizations such as the UN. Thirdly, I argue that Chinese funding for these projects is used to achieve local development agendas and to increase regional connectivity in South Asia.
    [Show full text]