DOCSLIB.ORG

Ecological Surveying Techniques for Protected Flora and Fauna During the Planning of National Road Schemes NRA Ecological Survey Maciek 3/19/09 11:55 AM Page Ii

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Ecological Surveying Techniques for Protected Flora and Fauna During the Planning of National Road Schemes NRA Ecological Survey Maciek 3/19/09 11:55 AM Page Ii NRA Ecological Survey maciek 3/19/09 11:55 AM Page i Ecological Surveying Techniques for Protected Flora and Fauna during the Planning of National Road Schemes NRA Ecological Survey maciek 3/19/09 11:55 AM Page ii Ecological Surveying Techniques for Protected Flora and Fauna during the Planning of National Road Schemes ii NRA Ecological Survey maciek 3/19/09 11:55 AM Page iii CONTENTS Chapter 1 Introduction .......................................................................................... 1 Chapter 2 Structure of the ‘Survey Guidelines’ .................................................... 2 Chapter 3 Survey considerations ........................................................................... 3 3.1 Recognising and dealing with key potential constraints/limitations 3 3.1.1 Seasonal constraints .................................................................... 3 3.1.2 Climatic conditions ...................................................................... 3 3.1.3 Inter-annual variation ................................................................. 3 3.1.4 Access limitations ........................................................................ 3 3.2 Survey effort ......................................................................................... 3 3.3 Survey standards ................................................................................... 5 3.4 Establishing baseline conditions .......................................................... 5 3.5 Monitoring ............................................................................................ 5 3.6 Future use of survey information ........................................................ 6 3.7 Health and Safety Considerations ....................................................... 6 Chapter 4 Survey techniques ................................................................................. 7 4.1 Desk studies .......................................................................................... 7 4.2 Multi-disciplinary walkover surveys .................................................... 7 4.3 Group-specific and species-specific surveys ........................................ 7 Group Specific Guidance Notes and Key Cards : Habitats, Plants and Fungi – Group Specific Guidance Note ....................................... 9 General characteristics of the group ................................................................ 10 Potential impacts of road projects ................................................................... 10 Survey techniques ............................................................................................. 10 iii Surveys to be undertaken as part of multidisciplinary walkover ................... 11 Habitat Survey ................................................................................................... 11 Species composition assessment ....................................................................... 11 Hedgerow survey .............................................................................................. 11 Surveys to be undertaken of particular sites or features ............................... 11 Species-specific surveys ..................................................................................... 12 Plant and fungal community surveys to assess conservation importance ..... 12 River Habitat Surveys (RHS) and River Corridor Surveys (RCS) ....................... 13 Mitigation, compensation and enhancement ................................................. 13 Key reference .................................................................................................... 14 KEY CARD: Varnished hook-moss ( Hamatocaulis vernicosus ) ................................... 15 KEY CARD: Killarney fern ( Trichomanes speciosum ) .................................................. 17 KEY CARD: Sedges and GrassesSlender Cottongrass ( Eriophorum gracile ) .............. 19 KEY CARD: Marsh Saxifrage ( Saxifraga hirculus ) ........................................................ 23 KEY CARD: Orchids Irish lady’s-tresses ( Spiranthes romanzoffiana ) .......................... 25 TERRESTRIAL INVERTEBRATES ...................................................................................... 29 Group-specific Guidance Note: Terrestrial Invertebrates ................................ 30 General characteristics of the group ................................................................ 30 Potential impacts of road projects ................................................................... 30 Survey techniques ............................................................................................. 31 Mitigation, compensation, enhancement ....................................................... 31 KEY CARD: Marsh Snails ( Vertigo spp. ) ....................................................................... 33 KEY CARD: Kerry Slug ( Geomalacus maculosus ) ........................................................ 37 KEY CARD: Marsh Fritillary ( Euphydryas aurinia ) ...................................................... 41 NRA Ecological Survey maciek 3/19/09 11:55 AM Page iv Ecological Surveying Techniques for Protected Flora and Fauna during the Planning of National Road Schemes AQUATIC INVERTEBRATES ............................................................................................ 45 Group-specific Guidance Note: Aquatic Invertebrates ................................... 46 General characteristics of the group ................................................................ 46 Potential impacts of road projects ................................................................... 46 Survey techniques ............................................................................................. 46 Mitigation, Compensation, Enhancement ....................................................... 48 KEY CARD: Freshwater Pearl Mussel ( Margaritifera margaritifera ) .......................... 49 KEY CARD: White-clawed crayfish ( Austropotamobius pallipes )............................... 53 FISH ................................................................................................................................ 57 Group-specific Guidance Note: Fish ................................................................. 58 General characteristics of the group ................................................................ 58 Potential impacts of road projects ................................................................... 58 Survey techniques ............................................................................................. 59 Mitigation, compensation and enhancement ................................................. 60 Key reference .................................................................................................... 61 KEY CARD: Lamprey Species ........................................................................................ 63 KEY CARD: Atlantic Salmon ( Salmo salar ) .................................................................. 67 KEY CARD: Shad Species .............................................................................................. 71 AMPHIBIANS .................................................................................................................. 75 Group-specific Guidance Note: Amphibians .................................................... 76 General characteristics of the group ................................................................ 76 Potential impacts of road projects ................................................................... 76 Survey techniques ............................................................................................. 76 Mitigation, compensation and enhancement ................................................ 76 KEY CARD: Smooth newt ( Triturus (Lissotriton) vulgaris ) .......................................... 79 iv KEY CARD: Common frog ( Rana temporaria ) ............................................................. 83 REPTILES ......................................................................................................................... 85 Group-specific Guidance Note: Reptiles .......................................................... 86 General Characteristics ..................................................................................... 86 Potential Impacts of Road Projects .................................................................. 86 Survey Techniques ............................................................................................. 86 Mitigation, compensation and enhancement ................................................ 87 KEY CARD: Viviparous lizard ( Lacerta (Zootoca) vivipara ) ......................................... 89 BIRDS .............................................................................................................................. 93 Group-specific Guidance Note: Birds ............................................................... 94 General characteristics of the group ................................................................ 94 Potential impacts of road projects .................................................................. 94 Survey Techniques ............................................................................................. 94 Breeding bird surveys ........................................................................................ 95 Wintering bird surveys .....................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Adamstown Sdz Planning Scheme 2014: Appropriate Assessment Screening Report
    Adamstown ADAMSTOWN SDZ PLANNING SCHEME 2014: APPROPRIATE ASSESSMENT SCREENING REPORT South Dublin County Council Land Use Planning & Transportation Department Part 1 Determination as to whether or not the Adamstown SDZ Planning Scheme and Draft Amendments would adversely affect the integrity of a European site Determination A formal screening process of the Adamstown SDZ Planning Scheme 2003 and the 2013 Draft Amendments was carried out to determine whether Appropriate Assessment Article 6(3) of the Habitats Directive was required. The screening exercise were carried out in accordance with the Commission’s methodological guidance (EC, 2002) to determine a) whether the plan or project is directly connected to or necessary for the management of the site and b) whether the plan, alone or in combination with other plans and projects, is likely to have significant effects on a Natura 2000 site(s) in view of the site(s) conservation objectives. It was determined that an Appropriate Assessment of the Planning Scheme and Draft Amendments was not required having regard to: • The AA Screening Report (October 2013) and Addendum to the Screening Report (January 2014); • The characteristics of the Planning Scheme; • The objectives of the Plan to protect Natura 2000 sites and biodiversity; • The Strategic Environmental Assessment Environmental Report prepared; and • The consultations with the Prescribed Bodies Part 2 Appropriate Assessment Screening Report South Dublin County Habitats Directive Assessment SCREENING OF THE ADAMSTOWN SDZ PLANNING SCHEME,
    [Show full text]
  • SPECIES-SPECIFIC ADVICE Managing Habitats for Marsh Fritillary
    ENVIRONMENTAL FARMING SCHEME: SPECIES-SPECIFIC ADVICE Managing Habitats for Marsh Fritillary © NIEA © Robert Thompson © NIEA Marsh Fritillary adult, caterpillars and habitat The Environmental Farming Scheme (EFS) is the new agri-environment Scheme for Northern Ireland funded under the Rural Development Programme 2014-2020. EFS supports farmers and land managers to carry out environmentally beneficial farming practices over and above mandatory requirements. One of the key aims of the Scheme is to restore, preserve and enhance biodiversity. This species-specific advice has been written for EFS Planners and agreement holders. It provides background information on the Marsh Fritillary, along with advice on important landscape features and management best practice for this species, within the range of EFS Habitat Options. Habitats Options which may apply to Marsh Fritillary are; purple moor-grass rush pasture, calcareous grassland, cut-over bog, lowland meadow, fens, upland heathland, lowland heathland and coastal sand dunes. The Marsh Fritillary is a threatened species of butterfly in need of urgent conservation action. Once widespread throughout Europe, this species has dramatically declined in recent years and is now only found across a fraction of its former range. Although some parts of the island of Ireland continue to support strong populations of the Marsh Fritillary, there has been a severe decline here too. In Northern Ireland there are two distinct landscapes in which the Marsh Fritillary is now found. In Antrim, Armagh, Down and Londonderry the Marsh Fritillary persists on small, isolated sites of suitable habitat within a wider landscape of improved agricultural land. In Fermanagh and Tyrone the extent of unimproved land is much greater, forming an extensive landscape which supports much larger and more sustainable populations of the species.
    [Show full text]
  • Long Range Transportation Plan for Fish and Wildlife Service Lands In
    U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service Long Range Transportation Plan for Fish and Wildlife Service Lands in Region 1 Final Draft September 2011 Long Range Transportation Plan for Fish and Wildlife Service Lands in Region 1 Primary Contact Jeff Holm Chief, R1 Branch of Transportation, Refuge Roads Coordinator, R1 & R8 U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service National Wildlife Refuge System 911 NE 11th Avenue Portland, OR 97232 [email protected] 503/231-2161 Acknowledgements Mike Marxen, Chief, R1 Branch of Visitor Services and Communication Paul Hayduk, R1 Hatchery and Facility Operations Coordinator Roxanne Bash, Western Federal Lands, Federal Highway Administration Special Thanks Steve Suder, National Coordinator, Refuge Transportation Program, FWS Nathan Caldwell, National Alternative Transportation Coordinator, FWS Alex Schwartz, R1 Landscape Architect Kirk Lambert, R1 Asset Management Coordinator David Drescher, Chief, R1 Refuge Information Susan Law, Western Federal Lands, Federal Highway Administration Pete Field, Western Federal Lands, Federal Highway Administration Consultant Team Atkins Melissa Allen, AICP Steve Hoover, AICP Tina Brand Cover Photo: David Pitkin/USFWS U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service - Region 1 Long Range Transportation Plan for Fish and Wildlife Service Lands in Region 1 Table of Contents Executive Summary ....................................................................... .ES-1 Why was the Long Range Transportation Plan for U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Lands initiated? .... .ES-1 What are the Goals for this Long Range Transportation
    [Show full text]
  • David Clements Ecology Ltd Carlton House, 5 Herbert Terrace, Penarth, Glamorgan, CF64 2AH Tel/Fax: 029 20 350120 [email protected] DAVID CLEMENTS ECOLOGY LTD
    DDAAVVIIDD CCLLEEMMEENNTTSS EECCOOLLOOGGYY LLTTDD MERTHYR TYDFIL COUNTY BOROUGH SITES OF IMPORTANCE FOR NATURE CONSERVATION SO 00SW/2: RHYDYCAR WEST SURVEY & ASSESSMENT FOR SINC DESIGNATION May 2006 David Clements Ecology Ltd Carlton House, 5 Herbert Terrace, Penarth, Glamorgan, CF64 2AH Tel/Fax: 029 20 350120 [email protected] DAVID CLEMENTS ECOLOGY LTD Site Name: RHYDYCAR WEST Grid Ref(s): SO 045047 Site No.: SO 00SW/2 SO 033050 (W); 038053 (N); 053036 (E); 034031 (S) Status: Candidate Date: July 2002 July 2002: Provisional site; boundary identified from available Proposed Date: desk-top sources only; requires confirmation by survey. Confirmed Date: Dec 2005: Site surveyed and assessed for designation; designation boundary identified. Summary - Reasons for Selection/Interest of Site: Very extensive mosaic of ‘ffridd’ habitats and former mine spoil supporting complex of semi- upland and lowland habitats, partly contained within conifer plantation. Main components are ancient semi-natural woodland fragments, other semi-natural woodlands (mainly upland oak, Quercus sp) together with wet woodlands of alder (Alnus glutinosa), wet heathland, dry heathland, marshy grassland and semi-improved neutral grasslands. Also there are some bracken slopes, scrub, small ponds, streams and sections of dismantled railway. There are areas of semi- improved acid grasslands to the south especially. The habitats intergrade to form a complex mosaic, and may therefore also include some small areas of improved or low diversity semi- improved grassland, but any such areas are a very minor component. Great crested newt occurs in small pools within the SINC, and noctule and pipistrelle bats have both been recorded. Water vole may occur and a small badger sett is present.
    [Show full text]
  • Euphydryas 1
    Identification Guide: Small Fritillaries - Euphydryas 1 Distinguishing Euphydryas by size A comparison of approximate average sizes* Identifying fritillaries* in Europe is difficult due to there being over 40 superficially similar species. As a starting point they are usually roughly divided by size into: 23-40mm ‘large’ fritillaries [Argynnis, Fabriciana, Speyeria], ‘medium-sized’ fritillaries 17-26mm [Brenthis, Issoria], and ‘small’ fritillaries [Boloria, Euphydryas, Melitaea]. Two 14-24mm separate guides in this series cover the Large/Medium Sized and Boloria. A future guide will cover the other small fritillaries, i.e. Melitaea. Euphydryas are noticeably smaller than Argynnis, Fabriciana and Speyeria (see diagram opposite) making confusion with these species very unlikely. MEDIUM SMALL However, the medium sized species, which are intermediates, can be comparable LARGE [Brenthis, Issoria] [Boloria, Euphydryas, in size to Euphydryas with Brenthis ino and Brenthis hecate being most similar. [Argynnis, Fabriciana, * This is an arbitrary grouping, see note on page 4. Melitaea] Speyeria] * if this page is displayed or printed at A4 size Distinguishing the six species of Euphydryas from Boloria, Brenthis, Issoria, and Melitaea Melitaea Euphydryas Uppersides Euphydryas uppersides are usually Boloria, Brenthis, Issoria bright and multicoloured whilst most* Melitaea males and females tend to be duller and uniformly coloured. Euphydryas males and Melitaea athalia females usually have colourful Some Euphydryas have a row uppersides resembling a grid or of small black dots in a distinct orange band net-like pattern, which readily Euphydryas maturna Euphydryas aurinia here on the upperside hind-wing. differentiates them from Boloria, Most* Melitaea do not have this feature. Brenthis and Issoria whichcell have Euphydryas Undersides * See below for species that may confuse.
    [Show full text]
  • Fauna of New Zealand Ko Te Aitanga Pepeke O Aotearoa
    aua o ew eaa Ko te Aiaga eeke o Aoeaoa IEEAE SYSEMAICS AISOY GOU EESEAIES O ACAE ESEAC ema acae eseac ico Agicuue & Sciece Cee P O o 9 ico ew eaa K Cosy a M-C aiièe acae eseac Mou Ae eseac Cee iae ag 917 Aucka ew eaa EESEAIE O UIESIIES M Emeso eame o Eomoogy & Aima Ecoogy PO o ico Uiesiy ew eaa EESEAIE O MUSEUMS M ama aua Eiome eame Museum o ew eaa e aa ogaewa O o 7 Weigo ew eaa EESEAIE O OESEAS ISIUIOS awece CSIO iisio o Eomoogy GO o 17 Caea Ciy AC 1 Ausaia SEIES EIO AUA O EW EAA M C ua (ecease ue 199 acae eseac Mou Ae eseac Cee iae ag 917 Aucka ew eaa Fauna of New Zealand Ko te Aitanga Pepeke o Aotearoa Number / Nama 38 Naturalised terrestrial Stylommatophora (Mousca Gasooa Gay M ake acae eseac iae ag 317 amio ew eaa 4 Maaaki Whenua Ρ Ε S S ico Caeuy ew eaa 1999 Coyig © acae eseac ew eaa 1999 o a o is wok coee y coyig may e eouce o coie i ay om o y ay meas (gaic eecoic o mecaica icuig oocoyig ecoig aig iomaio eiea sysems o oewise wiou e wie emissio o e uise Caaoguig i uicaio AKE G Μ (Gay Micae 195— auase eesia Syommaooa (Mousca Gasooa / G Μ ake — ico Caeuy Maaaki Weua ess 1999 (aua o ew eaa ISS 111-533 ; o 3 IS -7-93-5 I ie 11 Seies UC 593(931 eae o uIicaio y e seies eio (a comee y eo Cosy usig comue-ase e ocessig ayou scaig a iig a acae eseac M Ae eseac Cee iae ag 917 Aucka ew eaa Māoi summay e y aco uaau Cosuas Weigo uise y Maaaki Weua ess acae eseac O o ico Caeuy Wesie //wwwmwessco/ ie y G i Weigo o coe eoceas eicuaum (ue a eigo oaa (owe (IIusao G M ake oucio o e coou Iaes was ue y e ew eaIa oey oa ue oeies eseac
    [Show full text]
  • I, Environmental Radioactivity Surveillance Programme 1994
    - 57/? c o I, IE9800002 i n f o r m u t IV t si' Environmental Radioactivity Surveillance Programme 1994 - D. I/. D. Howett E. Hayden M. Fegan M. O'Colmain J.D. Cunningham December 1997 2 9-39 Radiological Protection Institute of Ireland An Inslitiuid Eireannach um Chosaint Raideolaioch CONTENTS 1 Introduction 1 2 Airborne Radioactivity 1 3 Rainwater 5 4 Drinking Water Supplies 5 5 Milk 7 6 External Gamma Dose Rate 7 7 Conclusions 8 8 Acknowledgements 8 9 References 9 Tables 10 List of Figures Figure 1 Sampling Stations Figure 2 Atmospheric Krypton-85 Concentrations at Clonskeagh (Dublin), 1993 - 1996 List of Tables Table 1 Sampling Stations Table 2 Radioactivity in Airborne Particulates, 1994 Table 3 Radioactivity in Airborne Particulates, 1995 Table 4 Radioactivity in Airborne Particulates, 1996 Table 5 Caesium-137 and Beryllium-7 in Air at Beggars Bush (Dublin), 1994 to 1996 Table 6 Krypton-85 in Air at Clonskeagh (Dublin), 1994 Table 7 Krypton-85 in Air at Clonskeagh (Dublin), 1995 Table 8 Krypton-85 in Air at Clonskeagh (Dublin), 1996 Table 9 Deposition of Radioactivity by Rainfall, 1994 Table 10 Deposition of Radioactivity by Rainfall, 1995 Table 11 Deposition of Radioactivity by Rainfall, 1996 Table 12 Gross Alpha and Beta Activities in Drinking Water, 1994 Table 13 Gross Alpha and Beta Activities in Drinking Water, 1995 Table 14 Gross Alpha and Beta Activities in Drinking Water, 1996 Table 15 Radium-226 and Radium-228 in Drinking Water, 1994 to 1996 Table 16 External Gamma Dose Rates, 1994 to 1996 Table 17 Radioactivity in Milk, 1994 Table 18 Radioactivity in Milk, 1995 Table 19 Radioactivity in Milk, 1996 1 INTRODUCTION This report presents the results of the terrestrial monitoring programme implemented by the Radiological Protection Institute of Ireland during the period 1994 to 1996 and is the latest in a series of periodic reports.
    [Show full text]
  • Downloaded 2021-10-01T00:38:27Z
    Provided by the author(s) and University College Dublin Library in accordance with publisher policies. Please cite the published version when available. Title ESManage Programme: Irish Freshwater Resources and Assessment of Ecosystem Services Provision Authors(s) Feeley, Hugh B.; Bruen, Michael; Bullock, Craig; Christie, Mike; Kelly, Fiona; Kelly-Quinn, Mary Publication date 2017 Series Report no. 207 Publisher Environmental Protection Agency Link to online version http://www.epa.ie/researchandeducation/research/researchpublications/researchreports/research207.html Item record/more information http://hdl.handle.net/10197/8516 Downloaded 2021-10-01T00:38:27Z The UCD community has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you. Your story matters! (@ucd_oa) © Some rights reserved. For more information, please see the item record link above. Report No. 207 ESManage Project: Irish Freshwater Resources and Assessment of Ecosystem Services Provision Authors: Hugh B. Feeley, Michael Bruen, Craig Bullock, Mike Christie, Fiona Kelly and Mary Kelly-Quinn www.epa.ie ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY Monitoring, Analysing and Reporting The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is responsible for on the Environment protecting and improving the environment as a valuable asset for • Monitoring air quality and implementing the EU Clean Air the people of Ireland. We are committed to protecting people for Europe (CAFÉ) Directive. and the environment from the harmful effects of radiation and pollution. • Independent reporting to inform decision making by national and local government (e.g. periodic reporting on the State of The work of the EPA can be Ireland’s Environment and Indicator Reports). divided into three main areas: Regulating Ireland’s Greenhouse Gas Emissions Regulation: We implement effective regulation and • Preparing Ireland’s greenhouse gas inventories and projections.
    [Show full text]
  • Irish Wetland Bird Survey: Waterbird Monitoring Monitoring Waterbird Brian Burke Ordinated
    Irish Wetland Bird Survey: Results of Waterbird Monitoring in Ireland in 2015/16 (Brian Burke) apwing L Prepared by Brian Burke, Niamh Fitzgerald & Lesley Lewis January 2018 I-WeBS is funded by the National Parks and Wildlife Service of the Department of Culture, Heritage, and the Gaeltacht, and is co- ordinated by BirdWatch Ireland. I-WeBS: Results of Waterbird Monitoring in Ireland in 2015/16 Contents Summary .................................................................................................................................................................. 1 Introduction.............................................................................................................................................................. 2 Methods ................................................................................................................................................................... 2 Field methods .................................................................................................................................................. 2 Analyses ........................................................................................................................................................... 2 Results ...................................................................................................................................................................... 3 Coverage .........................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Penygroes Saron
    Wildlife in your Ward Wildlife in your Wards – Penygroes and Saron The Carmarthenshire Nature unmapped. There is always A resilient natural environment Partnership has produced this more to find out. supports wildlife and provides a profile to highlight some of the Wildlife and our natural range of ecosystem services, wildlife, habitats, and important environment reflect local e.g. agricultural products, sites in your local area. culture and past human pollinators, timber, drinking Carmarthenshire is justly activity. We see this in the field water, regulation of floods and celebrated for the variety within and hedgerow patterns in our soil erosion, carbon storage and its natural environment, from agricultural landscapes, and in recreation and inspiration. Find the uplands in the north-east of areas previously dominated by out more at: the county to our magnificent industry where, today, new https://bit.ly/3u12Nvp coastline. habitats develop on abandoned We hope it you will find this Every ward contributes to the land. And our farm, house and profile interesting and that it rich and varied network of street names provide clues to might encourage you to explore wildlife habitats that make up the history of our natural your local area and record what the county, whether that be environment. you see. There are links in the woodlands, grasslands The mosaic of habitats in profile that will help you to find hedgerows, rivers or gardens. Penygroes-Saron make up an out more and take action There are still gaps in our ecological network. If these locally. knowledge about habitats are well managed, Thank you to all those in Carmarthenshire’s natural are well connected and are Penygroes-Saron who have environment and the wildlife it sufficiently extensive, they will already sent information and supports.
    [Show full text]
  • Behind the Scenes
    ©Lonely Planet Publications Pty Ltd 689 Behind the Scenes SEND US YOUR FEEDBACK We love to hear from travellers – your comments keep us on our toes and help make our books better. Our well-travelled team reads every word on what you loved or loathed about this book. Although we cannot reply individually to your submissions, we always guarantee that your feedback goes straight to the appropriate authors, in time for the next edition. Each person who sends us information is thanked in the next edition – the most useful submissions are rewarded with a selection of digital PDF chapters. Visit lonelyplanet.com/contact to submit your updates and suggestions or to ask for help. Our award-winning website also features inspirational travel stories, news and discussions. Note: We may edit, reproduce and incorporate your comments in Lonely Planet products such as guidebooks, websites and digital products, so let us know if you don’t want your comments reproduced or your name acknowledged. For a copy of our privacy policy visit lonelyplanet.com/ privacy. Anthony Sheehy, Mike at the Hunt Museum, OUR READERS Steve Whitfield, Stevie Winder, Ann in Galway, Many thanks to the travellers who used the anonymous farmer who pointed the way to the last edition and wrote to us with help- Knockgraffon Motte and all the truly delightful ful hints, useful advice and interesting people I met on the road who brought sunshine anecdotes: to the wettest of Irish days. Thanks also, as A Andrzej Januszewski, Annelise Bak C Chris always, to Daisy, Tim and Emma. Keegan, Colin Saunderson, Courtney Shucker D Denis O’Sullivan J Jack Clancy, Jacob Catherine Le Nevez Harris, Jane Barrett, Joe O’Brien, John Devitt, Sláinte first and foremost to Julian, and to Joyce Taylor, Juliette Tirard-Collet K Karen all of the locals, fellow travellers and tourism Boss, Katrin Riegelnegg L Laura Teece, Lavin professionals en route for insights, information Graviss, Luc Tétreault M Marguerite Harber, and great craic.
    [Show full text]
  • RSPB CENTRE for CONSERVATION SCIENCE RSPB CENTRE for CONSERVATION SCIENCE Where Science Comes to Life
    RSPB CENTRE FOR CONSERVATION SCIENCE RSPB CENTRE FOR CONSERVATION SCIENCE Where science comes to life Contents Knowing 2 Introducing the RSPB Centre for Conservation Science and an explanation of how and why the RSPB does science. A decade of science at the RSPB 9 A selection of ten case studies of great science from the RSPB over the last decade: 01 Species monitoring and the State of Nature 02 Farmland biodiversity and wildlife-friendly farming schemes 03 Conservation science in the uplands 04 Pinewood ecology and management 05 Predation and lowland breeding wading birds 06 Persecution of raptors 07 Seabird tracking 08 Saving the critically endangered sociable lapwing 09 Saving South Asia's vultures from extinction 10 RSPB science supports global site-based conservation Spotlight on our experts 51 Meet some of the team and find out what it is like to be a conservation scientist at the RSPB. Funding and partnerships 63 List of funders, partners and PhD students whom we have worked with over the last decade. Chris Gomersall (rspb-images.com) Conservation rooted in know ledge Introduction from Dr David W. Gibbons Welcome to the RSPB Centre for Conservation The Centre does not have a single, physical Head of RSPB Centre for Conservation Science Science. This new initiative, launched in location. Our scientists will continue to work from February 2014, will showcase, promote and a range of RSPB’s addresses, be that at our UK build the RSPB’s scientific programme, helping HQ in Sandy, at RSPB Scotland’s HQ in Edinburgh, us to discover solutions to 21st century or at a range of other addresses in the UK and conservation problems.
    [Show full text]