GREATER BRISBANE KEY CORRIDORS PERFORMANCE REPORT Contents
Total Page：16
File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Taringa History Group Meeting Notices and Notes 2009 and 2010
1995 Aerial View of Taringa BCC Brisbane Images BCC-C120-9532.4 Taringa History Group Meeting Notices and Notes 2009 and 2010 Taringa History Group Taringa History Group Meeting Notices and Notes (2009 and 2010) Introduction Taringa’s potential as a residential suburb was recognised early in the life of the new Colony of Queensland. In the early 1860s 50 acres south of Moggill Road had been surveyed, sub-divided into house size lots and offered for sale. Marketed as the ‘West Milton’ Estate this name was also used in the western suburbs’ first postal contract secured by Alfred Roberts who ran a horse drawn omnibus to Brisbane. The opening of the railway in the 1870s spurred the building of homes and a number of businesses opened along the crest of Moggill Road. Something of a way stop this included a blacksmith, pub and grocery stores. In due course these would be joined by a school, places of worship, doctors surgery and private hospital, pharmacy, bakery, butchers, picture theatre, a masonic lodge and later service stations. The shopping and services strip became the centre of ‘village’ life, the hub of the local community. Importantly Taringa became the administration centre for local government when these authorities were formed by legislation in the late 1870s. The office for the Indooroopilly Divisional Board was built in the Moggill/Morrow Road split and subsequently extended to meet the needs of the Taringa Divisional Board, then the Taringa Shire Council as the local authority boundaries were progressively adjusted to reflect closer settlement in the inner suburbs. -
Section 3.7 – Local Area Frameworks
Draft Ipswich Planning Scheme 2019 Statement of Proposals 3.7 Local Area Frameworks 3.7.1 Preliminary (1) The Ipswich Local Government Area has been divided into thirty local area strategic planning units based on geographically identifiable communities of interest (areas with identifiable boundaries and within which there are broad land use and planning commonalities) to which individual Local Area Frameworks apply. (2) The thirty Local Area Frameworks provide a more detailed spatial expression of the policies included in the Whole of City Strategic Framework (refer to sections 3.1 to 3.6) for each of the local area strategic planning units by: (a) including a description of the geographic extent of the strategic planning unit to which the Local Area Framework applies; (b) identifying the Valuable Features in the area that are of significance and are to be protected; (c) identifying the most significant Development Constraints that impact on development in the area and that need to be considered and addressed in allocating precincts and for development assessment; (d) setting out the Growth Management outcomes that are to be delivered in the area; (e) identifying the key Infrastructure that needs to be delivered to support growth and development in the area; (f) showing the preferred use of land in the area by including each property in a land use precinct designation; and (g) where there are different development options (including for example building heights, lot sizes, dwelling densities or different land uses) for an area or individual -
Technical Report 7 Air Quality Impact Assessment: Brisbane Northern Link Project
TECHNICAL REPORT 7 AIR QUALITY IMPACT ASSESSMENT: BRISBANE NORTHERN LINK PROJECT 24 July 2008 Prepared for Sinclair Knight Merz / Connell Wagner Joint Venture by Holmes Air Sciences Suite 2B, 14 Glen St Eastwood NSW 2122 Phone : (02) 9874 8644 Fax : (02) 9874 8904 Email : [email protected] Holmes Air Sciences EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The following report presents an analysis of the air quality impacts of the proposed Brisbane Northern Link Project (the “Project”). The Project involves the construction and operation of an underground toll road (tunnel) between the Western Freeway, in Toowong, and the Inner City Bypass (ICB), at Kelvin Grove. The study focuses on air quality impacts arising from the Project. The study has attempted to answer the following questions: • How would air quality change as a result of the Project? • How do the air quality impacts of the Project compare with the “do nothing” case? • Would the Project achieve compliance with air quality goals? Computer-based dispersion modelling has been used as the primary tool to assist with the assessment. Various existing and future scenarios have been simulated and compared in order to gain a greater understanding of the likely impacts that the Project would have on the local air quality. From the assessments that have been undertaken the following conclusions were drawn: • Pollutant concentrations in the study area in future years (2014+), arising from motor vehicles, would be expected to be similar to existing (2007) concentrations. This is the case both with and without the Project. • Model results for future years are considered to be conservative since no further improvements to vehicle emissions have been taken into account. -
Published on DNRME Disclosure Log RTI Act 2009
Market Survey Report 2016 for Brisbane City Council 2009 DNRMEAct on RTI Log Thursday, 25 October 2018 Published Disclosure 18-228 File A Page 1 of 109 2009 DNRMEAct on RTI Log Published This publication has been compiledDisclosure by State Valuation Services , Department of Natural Resources, Mines and Energy. © State of Queensland, 2018 The Queensland Government supports and encourages the dissemination and exchange of its information. The copyright in this publication is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) licence. Under this licence you are free, without having to seek our permission, to use this publication in accordance with the licence terms. You must keep intact the copyright notice and attribute the State of Queensland as the source of the publication. Note: Some content in this publication may have different licence terms as indicated. For more information on this licence, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The information contained herein is subject to change without notice. The Queensland Government shall not be liable for technical or other errors or omissions contained herein. The reader/user accepts all risks and responsibility for losses, damages, costs and other consequences resulting directly or indirectly from using this information. 18-228 File A Page 2 of 109 Table of contents No table of contents entries found. 2009 DNRMEAct on RTI Log Published Disclosure 18-228 File A Page 3 of 109 Brief Overview Local Authority Statistics Amount No. of Valuations 334,990 Existing Total Amount($) 189,283,243,153 New Total Amount($) 200,817,023,527 Overall Factor Change 1.061 No of Sales(all sectors) 17,018 Summary of Impacts Land Use No. -
RACQ Ipswich Motorway Policy Analysis
Policy Analysis 9/05 Economic & Public Policy Ipswich Motorway Introduction The Ipswich Motorway is a vital link between Brisbane and Ipswich. It connects Ipswich and Granard Roads at Rocklea to the Warrego and Cunningham Highways and Brisbane Road at Dinmore. For many years, it formed part of the National Highway System (NHS), which was a Commonwealth Government funding responsibility. Since the release of the Commonwealth’s AusLink land transport policy in June 2004, the Ipswich Motorway has been part of a broader National Network. The AusLink policy decreed that the states must share costs of the National Network, particularly in urban areas. The Ipswich Motorway is one of Queensland’s most congested roads, with stop-start conditions during morning and afternoon peak periods. It also has one of the highest vehicle accident rates in Queensland. Yet, the upgrading of this hopelessly inadequate and dangerous road has been subjected to extraordinary delays because of political bickering and dithering. This document summarises the history of recent proposals to upgrade the Ipswich Motorway, analyses Commonwealth and State Government policies regarding the road, and outlines RACQ’s position. Background The Ipswich Motorway upgrade project has been dogged by delays, conflict between governments, and political manoeuvring. In the meantime, road trauma and congestion continue to worsen on this very sub-standard stretch of the National Network. The following brief chronology highlights key events in this sad, sorry saga. 1997 The Integrated Regional Transport Plan for South East Queensland, which was released in 1997, proposed commencement in 1997-98 of a major investigation in respect of an Ipswich Motorway upgrade. -
Brisbane City Council (Council)
volume 1 environmental impact statement supplementary report June 2009 Northern Link Environmental Impact Statement Supplementary Report June 2009 PAGE i PAGE 1-3 Northern Link Supplementary Report Table of Contents 1. Introduction 1-7 1.1 Purpose of the Supplementary Report 1-7 1.2 Consultation on the EIS 1-7 1.3 Coordinator General’s Evaluation Report 1-8 2. Overview and Development of the Project 2-9 2.1 Background to the notification of the EIS submission period 2-9 2.2 Further development of the Project 2-9 2.3 Overview of Submissions Received 2-10 2.3.1 Submissions from Government Agencies 2-10 2.3.2 Public Submissions 2-12 2.3.3 Response to submissions 2-14 2.4 Draft Outline Environmental Management Plan 2-14 2.5 Urban Mitigations 2-14 3. Description of the Project 3-16 3.1 General Description of Northern Link 3-16 3.2 Project Design 3-16 3.2.1 Surface Road Connections 3-17 3.2.2 Ventilation Stations and Outlets 3-18 3.3 Project Delivery Mode 3-18 3.3.1 Program and Responsibilities 3-18 3.3.2 Establishment and Preliminary Works 3-20 3.3.3 Tunnel Construction 3-20 3.4 Project Operations Mode 3-22 4. Assessment of the Northern Link Project 4-25 4.1 Traffic and Transport 4-28 4.1.1 Forecast Demand for Northern Link 4-29 4.1.2 Function of Northern Link 4-33 4.1.3 Function of the Project connections 4-36 4.1.4 Traffic Volume Effects on Regional and Connecting Roads and Intersections 4-37 4.1.5 Effects on Local Roads 4-54 4.1.6 Metropolitan Area Network Performance 4-62 4.1.7 Travel Time Benefits 4-65 4.1.8 Local Access Effects 4-72 -
Queensland Transport and Roads Investment Program (QTRIP) 2016
Metropolitan Metropolitan | Map and Contact Details Brisbane office 313 Adelaide Street | Brisbane | Qld 4000 PO Box 70 | Spring Hill | Qld 4004 (07) 3066 5499 | [email protected] Divider Image: Moggill Road Cycle Bridge looking north east towards Brisbane central business district (bridge spans Moggill Road, Indooroopilly). Copyright © 2015 Department of Transport and Main Roads, the Queensland Government. Department of Transport and Main Roads Metropolitan Overview • A two-lane bus-only extension road from Warrigal Road • Commence intersection improvements on Mount Crosby through to Logan Road in Eight Mile Plains. Road, at the Delacy Street and Pine Street intersection. The Metropolitan District covers an area of about 2,968km2, or around 0.2% of Queensland1. It straddles the Brisbane In 2016-17 we will: • Continue to seek Australian Government funding River and extends from Mount Glorious in the north to Logan for the Pacific Motorway-Gateway Motorway merge City in the south, and from Point Lookout in the east to west • Continue construction of the Gateway Upgrade North upgrade (southbound lanes), with $42 million provided of Helidon and the major centre of Ipswich. project that will widen the Gateway Motorway to towards this $210 million project by the Queensland six lanes, between Nudgee and Bracken Ridge, jointly Government as part of the State Infrastructure Fund. The district has an estimated residential population of funded by the Australian Government and Queensland about 1,461,733 or around 31.4% of Queensland’s total Government. population1. Future plans • Commence the Ipswich Motorway (Rocklea to Darra) The district looks after about 414km of other state-controlled Stage 1 project, to construct additional lanes between We are continuing to plan for the future transport roads, about 112km of the National Land Transport Network, Oxley Road and Suscatand Street, jointly funded by the requirements of residents in the Metropolitan District. -
1976-St-Joseph-College-Terrace.Pdf
ST. JOSEPH'S COLLEGE Gregory Terrace 1976 . 1 . 1 4 --if- - lilLIJ 2er.A', 1 L-7,14Lh. Q r I I Joh M. a - N. = = = '11 LJ / r, His Grace the Archbishop of Brisbane, Most Rev. F.R. Rush D.D. Photograph by Courtesy of the Catholic Leader HEADMASTER'S REPORT EXCERPTS FROM Catholic Education: THE HEADMASTER'S REPORT In spite of increasing financial burdens to be borne by parents who wish to send their children I have the honour to present to you tonight the to schools like ours there is still evident a keen Annual Report for the first year of the second desire on the part of parents to make this kind century of St. Joseph's College. of education available to their children. Our I welcome you all on behalf of the College to enrolments are keeping up well and this surely this evening's function and in a particular way I is a reliable guide that parents want what Terrace welcome you to this spot. Years ago the offers. ceremony which we now know as the "Speech It is axiomatic that a pupil can benefit most Night and Distribution of Prizes" was held on from being here if the home and school work an appropriate afternoon in the old College together. For the period that pupils are enrolled Quadrangle. Therefore in holding this evening at a particular school they and their parents here we are not really breaking new ground but have undertaken to uphold and support the are returning to the College after an absence of standards professed by that school. -
Local Heritage Register
Explanatory Notes for Development Assessment Local Heritage Register Amendments to the Queensland Heritage Act 1992, Schedule 8 and 8A of the Integrated Planning Act 1997, the Integrated Planning Regulation 1998, and the Queensland Heritage Regulation 2003 became effective on 31 March 2008. All aspects of development on a Local Heritage Place in a Local Heritage Register under the Queensland Heritage Act 1992, are code assessable (unless City Plan 2000 requires impact assessment). Those code assessable applications are assessed against the Code in Schedule 2 of the Queensland Heritage Regulation 2003 and the Heritage Place Code in City Plan 2000. City Plan 2000 makes some aspects of development impact assessable on the site of a Heritage Place and a Heritage Precinct. Heritage Places and Heritage Precincts are identified in the Heritage Register of the Heritage Register Planning Scheme Policy in City Plan 2000. Those impact assessable applications are assessed under the relevant provisions of the City Plan 2000. All aspects of development on land adjoining a Heritage Place or Heritage Precinct are assessable solely under City Plan 2000. ********** For building work on a Local Heritage Place assessable against the Building Act 1975, the Local Government is a concurrence agency. ********** Amendments to the Local Heritage Register are located at the back of the Register. G:\C_P\Heritage\Legal Issues\Amendments to Heritage legislation\20080512 Draft Explanatory Document.doc LOCAL HERITAGE REGISTER (for Section 113 of the Queensland Heritage -
District 1 / Northeastern Minnesota 1 Industry Clusters
Manufacturers’ Perspectives on Minnesota’s Transportation System District 1/Northeastern Minnesota June 2017 Cover photo credits: Front cover: Large truck, ship/lighthouse, highway and snow plow (inside) - David Gonzalez, MnDOT Wind turbine blade shipment at Duluth Port - Robert Welton, courtesy of Duluth Seaway Port Authority Back cover: Congested traffic (inside) and Duluth Port - David Gonzalez, MnDOT Table of Contents Executive Summary ........................................................................................................................................5 Purpose and Methodology .....................................................................................................................................5 Results .....................................................................................................................................................................5 Findings ...................................................................................................................................................................6 District 1 Business Priorities ...............................................................................................................................7 Characteristics that Affect the Transportation System ......................................................................................7 Recommended Next Steps ......................................................................................................................................7 MnDOT District -
Fall 2018 Mobility
MOBILITYMetro’s New Chairwoman I Foothill Transit Brings Back Double-Deckers I Reminiscing Along PCH I Gold Line On Track ROAD I RAIL I TRANSIT FALL 2018 Division 24 Robert “Bob” Bartlett Operations & Maintenance Facility ADVERTISING SUPPLEMENT TO THE LOS ANGELES TIMES AND SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA NEWSPAPER GROUP, PUBLISHED BY CIVIC PUBLICATIONS, INC. This supplement did not involve the editorial staff of the Los Angeles Times and the Southern California Newspaper Group. Printed with recycled paper. WELCOME TO MOBILITY 2018 The Price for a Civilized Society really don’t enjoy paying taxes. When I go out to dinner with friends and the bill comes, you can count on me to jokingly ask, “Who I ordered the tax!” Why do we pay taxes? First, some history. The word tax comes from the Latin word taxare, but the Romans were not the first or only civilization to impose taxes on their people. The ancient Greeks and Egyptians levied taxes on their own citizens and foreigners, and so did the Hebrews. So why do we pay taxes? We pay taxes because that is the price we pay to have a civilized society. A civilized society requires a well-funded government to provide essential community and public services including police and fire, parks, libraries, clean water, roads, highways and public transportation, to name a few. Taxes can be classified into two categories, regressive and progressive. If taxes negatively affect the poor they are considered regressive; The Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transit Authority (Metro) continues to extend light rail lines if they negatively affect the rich more than they throughout the county from the San Fernando Valley to the East San Gabriel Valley to Santa Monica negatively affect the poor they are considered and Long Beach. -
6 Pavement Surface Condition
FINAL REPORT Project Title: P15: Queensland Trial of High Standard Granular Base TrackStar Alliance Project (Year 4 - 2016/17) ARRB Project No: PRP16023 Author/s: Dr. Jeffrey Lee, Jonathon Griffin, Alan Conaghan Client: Queensland Department of Transport and Main Roads Date: 09/02/2018 AN INITIATIVE BY: TC-710-4-4-8 SUMMARY A significant portion of the Australian sealed road network is composed of Although the Report is believed to be unbound granular pavement layers with a sprayed seal surface. correct at the time of publication, Traditionally, unbound granular pavements are used in rural or light to ARRB, to the extent lawful, excludes moderately traffic applications, with higher quality asphalt, stabilised or all liability for loss (whether arising concrete pavements generally used in urban areas and in more heavily under contract, tort, statute or trafficked applications. otherwise) arising from the contents of the Report or from its use. Where Growing demands on infrastructure budgets has led to the desire to such liability cannot be excluded, it is investigate the use of unbound granular structures for heavy duty reduced to the full extent lawful. applications in Queensland. However, initial construction cost savings Without limiting the foregoing, people resulting from the provision of unbound granular pavements may be should apply their own skill and counteracted by increased maintenance requirements, the risk of premature judgement when using the information distress development and the potential for rapid failure. contained in the Report. The Queensland Department of Transport and Main Roads (TMR) is trialing a heavy-duty unbound granular pavement with a sprayed seal surfacing (denoted as SG(HD) TMR(2017)) incorporating high-standard granular (HSG) basecourse as part of the Centenary Motorway duplication project.