Socio-Economic Situation in the Region
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Social and Economic Space Compression in Border Areas: the Case of the Northwestern Federal District Romanova, E.; Vinogradova, O.; Frizina, I
www.ssoar.info Social and economic space compression in border areas: the case of the Northwestern Federal District Romanova, E.; Vinogradova, O.; Frizina, I. Veröffentlichungsversion / Published Version Zeitschriftenartikel / journal article Empfohlene Zitierung / Suggested Citation: Romanova, E., Vinogradova, O., & Frizina, I. (2015). Social and economic space compression in border areas: the case of the Northwestern Federal District. Baltic Region, 3, 28-46. https://doi.org/10.5922/2079-8555-2015-3-3 Nutzungsbedingungen: Terms of use: Dieser Text wird unter einer Free Digital Peer Publishing Licence This document is made available under a Free Digital Peer zur Verfügung gestellt. Nähere Auskünfte zu den DiPP-Lizenzen Publishing Licence. For more Information see: finden Sie hier: http://www.dipp.nrw.de/lizenzen/dppl/service/dppl/ http://www.dipp.nrw.de/lizenzen/dppl/service/dppl/ Diese Version ist zitierbar unter / This version is citable under: https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-51391-6 Economic and geographical development of the Russian Northwest ECONOMIC AND GEOGRAPHICAL DEVELOPMENT OF THE RUSSIAN NORTHWEST The so-called “compression” of social SOCIAL AND ECONOMIC and economic space has been the subject of SPACE COMPRESSION quite a few studies in the past decades. There are two principle types of compres- IN BORDER AREAS: sion: communicative, that is, associated THE CASE with the development of transport and in- OF THE NORTHWESTERN formation systems, and physical, mani- FEDERAL DISTRICT fested in the rapid decrease of the number of new territories to explore. While physi- cal and communicative compression are in- terrelated, they have different spatial ex- * pressions depending on geographical con- E. -
ESTLATRUS TRAFFIC Finished and Summarised
ESTLATRUS TRAFFIC finished and summarised "Saving lives, saving money!" was the resultative moto of project "Increasing traffic system’s capability within EE-LV-RU international importance transport corridors/ ESTLATRUS TRAFFIC" has been implemented within the time period April 1, 2014 till September 30, 2014, supported by the Estonia-Latvia-Russia cross border cooperation programme. Project results has saved lives by the improved road infrastructure, like in Tartu the crash cushion system has already saved at least one person´s life. On November, 2013 there was an accident on Riia street, Tartu, Estonia. Young driver lost control of his car and collided with crash cushion system. The crash cushion system has been repaired with the help of traffic insurance fund (http://www.tartupostimees.ee/2591704/tartus-juhitavuse-kaotanud-soiduki-peatas-porkeleevendi). The overall objective of the project was to increase the transport system’s sustainability, capability, accessibility and competitiveness of the Estonian-Latvian-Russian border region as the sphere of national interests through exchange and capacity building in visible traffic safety solutions and development of transport and road information infrastructure. All activities has been implemented within strong project partnership having about 20 cooperation organizations both municipalities, NGOs and state institutions. Cross-border resources for traffic safety has been mobilized by regular cross- border meetings, common patrolling in Russia, cross border study visits for the representatives of traffic safety institutions. Innovative cross-border traffic safety performance measures were implement like traffic safety campaigns "Sleep and drive!", "Mother, father and me - protected family!", "Safe Wheel", "Love life", "Know the traffic regulations abroad!". Even Santa Claus was organized the traffic safety campaign "Safe holidays" in Russia. -
75E6231a30789a77100300d26
ИНВЕСТИЦИОННЫЙ МЕМОРАНДУМ ПСКОВСКОЙ ОБЛАСТИ INVESTMENT MEMORANDUM PSKOV REGION 3 СОДЕРЖАНИЕ CONTENT 1. КРАТКАЯ ИНФОРМАЦИЯ О ПСКОВСКОЙ ОБЛАСТИ .........4 1. SHORT DESCRIPTION OF PSKOV REGION ........................ 5 2. КОНКУРЕНТНЫЕ ПРЕИМУЩЕСТВА 2. COMPITITIVE PREFERENCES ПСКОВСКОЙ ОБЛАСТИ ......................................................8 OF PSKOV REGION ............................................................. 9 2.1. Выгодное экономико-географическое положение, 2.1. Advantage economic geographical location, высокий уровень транспортной доступности ..................... 8 Effi ciency transport accessibility .......................................... 9 2.2. Высококвалифицированные трудовые ресурсы ........ 12 2.2. Highly-skilled labor resources. .....................................13 2.3 Наличие площадок для размещения промышленных 2.3 Existence of sites for industrial production производств и логистических центров ........................... 14 and logistics centers .........................................................15 2.4. Потенциал использования природных 2.4. Potential of nature resources ресурсов и полезных ископаемых ................................... 16 and minerals use ...............................................................17 2.4.1. Лесные ресурсы .................................................... 16 2.4.1. Forest resources ......................................................17 2.4.2. Водные ресурсы ................................................... 18 2.4.2. Water resources ......................................................19 -
The Carried Out(Spent) Analysis of the Received Data Testifies
CONCEPT OF WATER AND ECO TOURISM DEVELOPMENT AT THE RUSSIAN AREA OF PEIPUS / PSKOV LAKELAND NGO “Chudskoye Project” PSKOV 2005 WATER AND ECO TOURISM DEVELOPMENT AT PEIPUS / PSKOV LAKELAND © 2005 CONTENTS PART I. Analysis of water and ecological tourism at the Russian area of Peipus / Pskov lake basin .......................................................................................................................2 Section 1. General provisions ..................................................................................2 Section 2. An ecological situation at water reservoirs of fish management use .......5 Section 3. Flora and fauna .......................................................................................6 Section 4. Protected territories .................................................................................9 Section 5. Analysis of the Resolution # 172 «Border zone in Gdov, Pskov, Pechory, Palkino, Pytalovo, Krasnogorodsk, Sebezh municipalities of the Pskov region» and the Resolution # 177 «Border zone in Leningrad region» .................................................................................15 Section 6. Cultural and historical sites....................................................................17 Section 7. Tourism infrastructure. Pskov, Gdov, Pechory municipalities (Pskov region), Kingissepp, Slantsy municipalities and Ivangorod town (Leningrad region) .................................................................................19 Section 8. Analysis of tourist visits in Peipus/Pskov -
Pskov Region of the Russian Federation As Foreign Policy Actor
Pskov Region of the Russian Federation as Foreign Policy Actor by Eero MIKENBERG A dissertation submitted for the degree of PhD Faculty of Social Science, Department of Central and East European Studies University of Glasgow May 2006 ABSTRACT Subnational foreign activities are a new and relatively unexplored aspect of the international system. The absence of clear and universal rules creates an ambiguous political playground that can be misused by both states and their subnational governmental units for reaching their foreign policy and foreign trade goals. Worldwide, different patterns for subnational foreign activities in federal states have emerged. For example, in the United States, member states of the federation are fighting over foreign investments mainly. In Germany, on the other hand, members of the federation have delegated their rights in terms of foreign activities to the federal government. In general, federations with long democratic traditions have managed to introduce the formulas for containing subnational foreign activities. In Russia, in contrast, the breakdown of the Soviet Union confronted both the federal centre and members of federation with a fundamentally new situation. In Soviet times, the territorial units of the Russian Socialist Federative Soviet Republic (RSFSR), were of administrative nature only, i.e. they lacked the political dimension. 2 Some of the Russian regions were using their newly-gained freedom for the purpose of challenging the federal centre. Pskov region of Russia has been one of the most active -
Report Eng Full Excl. Annex 3
Strategy for wastewater treatment in the Lake Peipsi basin Project report Pskov Region Natural Resources Committee Authors Jens Møller Andersen, Aarhus County Environmental Division1, Denmark Ülo Sults, Peipsi Center for Transboundary Cooperation, Estonia Ago Jaani, Estonian Meteorological and Hydrological Institute, Estonia Priit Alekand, MAA ja VESI, Ltd., Estonia Gulnara Roll, Peipsi Center for Transboundary Cooperation, Estonia Alla Sedova, Neva – Ladoga Basin Water Management Administration, Russia Julia Nefedova, Pskov Region Natural Resources Committee, Russia Petr Gorelov, Pskov Region Natural Resources Committee, Russia Marina Kazmina, Pskov Federal State Water Management Enterprise, Russia Funding by Danish Environmental Protection Agency Maps by Margus Roll, GIS to Business Software Kersti Vennik, GIS to Business Software Photos by Peeter Unt, Peipsi Center for Transboundary Cooperation 1 Jens Møller Andersen works since 1 April 2001 at the Danish National Environmental Research Institute 1 Contents 1. Introduction 2. Objectives and history of the project 3. Background information on Lake Peipsi/Chudskoe 4. Strategy for wastewater treatment in Lake Peipsi Basin 5. Improved wastewater treatment: Consequences in Lake Peipsi Annex 1. Amme River pilot project Annex 2. Wastewater treatment project in Gdov Annex 3. Summary information on wastewater discharges and maps Annex 4. Project meetings 2 Lake Peipsi catchment area 3 Introduction Lake Peipsi (Lake Chudskoe – in Russian) is a part of the Baltic Sea water basin and is shared by Estonia and Russia. Estonia is a EU accession country and the lake is likely to become the future border between Russia and the European Union in a few years. The main environmental issue in the Narva River and Lake Peipsi basin is water eutrophication. -
Der Jahresbericht Von Kleine Herzen
2016 Der Jahresbericht von kleine herzen kleine herzen unterstützt verlassene Kinder in der Ukraine und Russland die dringend Hilfe brauchen und das alles ehrenamtlich mit Energie und Hoffnung. kleine herzen Österreich Jahresbericht 2016 Seite 1 von 15 DIE ARMUT STEIGT DURCH KONFLIKTE UND SANKTIONEN Der Anteil der Menschen, die am oder unterhalb des Existenzminimums leben, ist in beiden Ländern dramatisch gestiegen. Millionen Menschen kämpfen ums Überleben. Kinder sind von dieser schweren Lage am meisten betroffen. kleine herzen engagiert sich für die verlassenen Kinder dieser Länder. Die Ukraine ist das ärmste Land Europas. Im Jahr Bevölkerung ist von fallenden Reallöhnen inmitten 2016 trat die Ukraine in ein drittes Jahr des einer explodierenden Inflation deutlich betroffen. Konflikts. Jeden Tag fordert der Kampf zwischen Mehrere Millionen Menschen leben seitdem unter den Parteien des Konflikts weiterhin Todesopfer der Armutsgrenze. Im ersten Quartal 2016 und Verletzte in der Zivil- erreichte die Armutsquote in Russland 15,7 bevölkerung. Schäden an Prozent laut offiziellen Statistiken. Armut ist eine Krankenhäusern, Schulen, Eine Umfrage der Moskauer Wohnhäusern sowie lebens- Ungerechtigkeit, die Kinder Hochschule für Wirtschaft (HSE) wichtigen Infrastrukturen besonders hart trifft. Sie ergab allerdings, dass bereits mehr stellen weiterhin Hindernisse sind am schlimmsten als 40 Prozent der russischen dar, die eine Erholung und betroffen von den Folgen Haushalte mit hohen Lebensmittel- Rückkehr zur Normalität von Krieg, schlechter bzw. Kleidungspreisen zu kämpfen langfristig verlangsamen Ernährung, Krankheiten haben. Die Kinderheime sind von bzw. verhindern. Die und all der Not, in die sie der aktuellen Krise stark betroffen. Menschen haben ihre hineingeboren werden. Zu Beginn des Jahres 2016 wurde Ersparnisse aufgebraucht das staatliche Budget der und ihre Fähigkeit mit der Waisenhäuser trotz einer Inflation Situation zurecht zu von 15,6% im Jahr 2015 um 10% kommen, ist nach mehr als 30 Monaten des gesenkt. -
BR IFIC N° 2811 Index/Indice
BR IFIC N° 2811 Index/Indice International Frequency Information Circular (Terrestrial Services) ITU - Radiocommunication Bureau Circular Internacional de Información sobre Frecuencias (Servicios Terrenales) UIT - Oficina de Radiocomunicaciones Circulaire Internationale d'Information sur les Fréquences (Services de Terre) UIT - Bureau des Radiocommunications Part 1 / Partie 1 / Parte 1 Date/Fecha 19.01.2016 Description of Columns Description des colonnes Descripción de columnas No. Sequential number Numéro séquenciel Número sequencial BR Id. BR identification number Numéro d'identification du BR Número de identificación de la BR Adm Notifying Administration Administration notificatrice Administración notificante 1A [MHz] Assigned frequency [MHz] Fréquence assignée [MHz] Frecuencia asignada [MHz] Name of the location of Nom de l'emplacement de Nombre del emplazamiento de 4A/5A transmitting / receiving station la station d'émission / réception estación transmisora / receptora 4B/5B Geographical area Zone géographique Zona geográfica 4C/5C Geographical coordinates Coordonnées géographiques Coordenadas geográficas 6A Class of station Classe de station Clase de estación Purpose of the notification: Objet de la notification: Propósito de la notificación: Intent ADD-addition MOD-modify ADD-ajouter MOD-modifier ADD-añadir MOD-modificar SUP-suppress W/D-withdraw SUP-supprimer W/D-retirer SUP-suprimir W/D-retirar No. BR Id Adm 1A [MHz] 4A/5A 4B/5B 4C/5C 6A Part Intent 1 115153214 CAN 1812.5000 NEPEAN ON CAN 75°W46'37'' 45°N16'29'' FX 1 ADD 2 115153215 -
(Russian Ed. Print) DETECTION of SCHMALLENBERG V
AGRICULTURAL BIOLOGY, ISSN 2412-0324 (English ed. Online) 2019, V. 54, ¹ 6, pp. 1247-1256 (SEL’SKOKHOZYAISTVENNAYA BIOLOGIYA) ISSN 0131-6397 (Russian ed. Print) ISSN 2313-4836 (Russian ed. Online) UDC 636.2/.3:619:578 doi: 10.15389/agrobiology.2019.6.1247eng doi: 10.15389/agrobiology.2019.6.1247rus DETECTION OF SCHMALLENBERG VIRUS IN CATTLE IMPORTED INTO THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION O.G. GUBENKO, O.P. BJADOVSKAYA, A.V. SPRYGIN, S.V. KONONOVA, A.V. PISKUNOV, A.V. KONONOV Federal Center for Animal Health Control, FGBU VNIIZZh, mkr. Yurievets, Vladimir, 600901 Russia, e-mail gu- [email protected], [email protected], [email protected] ( corresponding author), [email protected], [email protected], [email protected] ORCID: Gubenko O.G. orcid.org/0000-0001-9252-9064 Kononova S.V. orcid.org/0000-0002-3932-2416 Byadovskaya O.P. orcid.org/0000-0002-8326-7151 Piskunov A.V. orcid.org/0000-0002-2805-5009 Sprygin A.V. orcid.org/0000-0001-5982-3675 Kononov A.V. orcid.org/0000-0002-5523-3261 The authors declare no conflict of interests Received December 27, 2018 A b s t r a c t Schmallenberg disease, a transmissive vector-borne arbovirus infection affecting cattle, sheep and goats of all age groups, which may lead to significant economic losses. In the Russian Federation, specific antibodies against the causative agent of Schmallenberg disease were first detect- ed in April 2013 and 2014 in the Andreapolsky and Konakovsky districts of the Tver region. In Oc- tober 2014, specific antibodies were detected in cattle blood in one of the farms of the Novo- sokolnichesky district of the Pskov region. -
Latvia Lbts Combined Yelisey
*** Since March 2012 Latvian holders of the local border traffic permits may visit the adjacent Belarusian border area without a visa. In June 2013, Latvians that reside in the vicinity of the Russia's border were entitled with a similar privilege. In turn, the residents of the Belarusian and Russian border areas may visit the Latvian border regions without a Schengen visa. This paper looks into the specifics of the Latvian local border traffic regimes with Belarus and Russia. Characteristics of the border area under the Latvian LBTs After the launch of the local border traffic (LBT) regime with Russia in June 2013, Latvia became the second EU country, after Poland, that has effective LBT agreements with two neighboring countries. A number of the EU countries (Hungary, Slovakia, Romania) and Norway as an associate member of the Schengen area have launched one LBT regime with a neighboring third country. Latvia's bilateral agreement with Belarus came into force on December 1, 2011. It took consecutive three months before the first lists of applicants were passed by the local authorities to the consulates responsible for the LBT permits issuance. Finally, first LBT permits were issued on March 1, 2012. 1 The border areas that fall under the Latvian LBT agreements, are quite sparsely populated, with no large towns except Daugavpils. Inclusion of Daugavpils into the Latvia-Belarus border area made its population to exceed considerably the population of each of the other three national border areas (see the table below). Table 1. Some features of the Latvian border areas with Belarus and Russia. -
Download an Article
THE DEVELOPMENT OF BORDER AND TRANSBORDER REGIONS RURAL AREAS OF RUSSIA’S NORTH-WEST BORDERLAND: PROBLEMS AND DEVELOPMENT PATHS А. I. Kostyaev North-West Research Institute Received 26 August 2019 of Economics and Organization of Agriculture doi: 10.5922/2079-8555-2019-4-6 7 Shosse Podbelskogo, Pushkin, St Petersburg, Russia, 196608 © Kostyaev А. I., 2019 This article focuses on the rural areas of Russia’s North-West borderlands, particularly, the municipal districts and towns that are closest to the national border. The study aims to identify problems in the development of these territories and provide solutions to them. The methodological framework employed is the neo-endogenous approach, which suggests the maximal multifunctionality-driven use of internal resources, bottom-up initiatives supported by the authorities, extensive use of innovations, the Internet, and scientific knowledge. The study takes into account and assesses the heterogeneity of rural areas by producing a typology of districts built on the structure of agricultural production, using the Hall-Tideman index. The study used several indicators to identify the role and place of border districts in their respective regions. Three types of districts were distinguished according to the structure of agricultural production: districts dominated by agricultural organisations, districts dominated by small farms, and mixed-type districts. Cross-district differences in output dynamics were described. The socially essential functions of rural areas and the economic entities performing those functions were identified. The analysis of the recreational resources of border districts helped to determine the directions in which the transformation of rural areas into consumer spaces was moving. The major development trajectories of rural areas were plotted using the non-endogenous approach and differentiated by the district types. -
Thematic Fact Sheet Issue and Presented in the Next Pages
PRIORITY I “Socio-economic development” and its thematic scope in the Programme THEMATIC The Estonia-Latvia-Russia CBC Programme tackles the Priority I “Socio-economic development” as a very important field of cooperation which provides an essential contribution to the Programme’s objectives. The Priority is dedicated to strategic development of border region’s competitiveness through support to business and labour market development, improvements in communication networks and exploring FACT SHEET region’s potential for tourism as well as maintaining efficient and Fact Sheet No 2, 2015 safe borders. These areas are foreseen to be addressed through a wide range of admissible project actions which include both investments and soft activities. Priority I includes three areas of cross-border cooperation: Measure 1.1 Fostering of socio-economic development and encouraging business and entrepreneurship Measure 1.2 Transport, logistics and communication solutions Measure 1.3 Tourism development Estonia – Latvia – Russia Priority I is funded with a considerable amount of the Cross Border Cooperation Programme’s funds comprising as much as 58% of the total budget that amounts to 34.14 M euro. Within Priority I the Programme within European Estonia-Latvia-Russia CBC Programme finances 14 projects of the 1st and 2nd Calls for Proposals altogether. These partner Neighbourhood and projects provide improvements in various areas of cooperation Partnership Instrument which can be grouped in 4 thematic fields – LIVING ENVIRONMENT AND SAFETY CONDITIONS (3 projects), 2007-2013 TOURIST SERVICES AND LOCAL ATTRACTIVENESS (5 projects), BUSINESS ENVIRONMENT AND SME SUPPORT (4 projects) and VOCATIONAL EDUCATION (2 projects). These projects are in the focus of this Thematic Fact Sheet issue and presented in the next pages.