DOCSLIB.ORG

Form 1 Import for Release Or Release from Containment

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

ER-AF-NO1-4 3/99 FORM 1 Application for approval to IMPORT FOR RELEASE OR RELEASE FROM CONTAINMENT ANY NEW ORGANISM under Section 34 of the Hazardous Substances and New Organisms Act 1996 Office use only Fees $ Date received / / Verified date / / Job manager ER-AF-NO1-4 3/99 Application for approval to import for release or FORM 1 release from containment any new organism under Section 34 of the Hazardous Substances Page 1 and New Organisms Act 1996 IMPORTANT Before you fill in this application form please talk to ERMA New Zealand. We can help you scope and prepare your application. The scale of information we need should match the potential significance of the application. For example, applications which may pose a significant risk to the environment or to human health need to be supported with more substantial information than applications which clearly pose a more minor risk. We need all relevant information early on in the application process. Quality information up front will speed up the process. Any extra material that does not fit in the application form must be clearly labelled and cross-referenced in the application form. Commercially sensitive information should be collated in a separate document. This form is in three parts. If you think your application may qualify for rapid assessment please check with us first and then complete only Parts A and B. Non rapid assessment applicants should complete Parts A and C only. All applicants must sign the form at the end of Part A and enclose the correct application fee. The standard notified application fee is $2,500 (excl GST). The fee for rapid assessment applications is $500. Please check with ERMA New Zealand staff. We are unable to process applications that do not contain the correct fee. All references to regulations in this form, unless otherwise noted, refer to the Hazardous Substances and New Organisms (New Organisms Forms and Information Requirements) Regulations 1998. Copies of all our application forms will soon also be available on our website: www.ermanz.govt.nz, and also in electronic form (MS Word format). If you have any suggestions for improvements to this form, please contact our operations staff at the address below. You can get more information at any time by telephoning, writing to, or calling in at our Wellington office. One of our staff members will be able to help you. List of application forms for new organisms: These are all our application forms related to new organisms. Please check you have the right one. Form 1 Application for approval under section 34 of the Act to import for release, or release from containment, any new organism – including rapid assessment (this form). Form 2 application for approval under section (40)(1)(a) of the Act to import into containment any new organism. Form 3 application for approval under section 40(1)(b) of the Act to develop in containment any genetically modified organism – including rapid assessment. Form 4 application for approval under section 40(1)(c) to field test (including large scale fermentation) in containment new organism. Form 5 application for approval under section 47 to use a new organism in an emergency. Form 6 application for approval under section 62 for grounds for reassessment of a new organism in containment. 20 Customhouse Quay, Cnr Waring Taylor & Customhouse Quay PO Box 131, Wellington Phone: 04-473 8426 Fax: 04-473 8433 Email: [email protected] Website: www.ermanz.govt.nz ER-AF-NO4-2 7/98 Application for approval to import for release or release from containment any new organism Page 2 under Section 34 of the Hazardous Substances and New Organisms Act 1996 Applicant details 1. Name and address in New Zealand of the applicant: This should be the organisation or person formally responsible for this application. Name: Auckland Regional Council Address: Private Bag 92012, Auckland Phone: (09) 373 9962 Fax: (09) 373 9961 2. The applicant’s address for service in New Zealand (if different from above): Address: N/A 3. Name of the contact person for the application (if different from applicant): This person should have sufficient knowledge to respond to queries and have the authority to make decisions on behalf of the applicant that relate to processing the application. Name: Mr Lance Vervoort Position: Manager Biosecurity Phone: (09) 373 9962 or (025) 222 9073 Fax: (09) 373 9961 Email: [email protected] This application has been prepared for the Auckland Regional Council by Landcare Research and Richard Hill & Associates. 20 Customhouse Quay, Cnr Waring Taylor & Customhouse Quay PO Box 131, Wellington Phone: 04-473 8426 Fax: 04-473 8433 Email: [email protected] Website: www.ermanz.govt.nz ER-AF-NO4-2 7/98 Application for approval to import for release or release from containment any new organism Page 3 under Section 34 of the Hazardous Substances and New Organisms Act 1996 4. Summary Provide a summary of the information contained in this application relating to the identification of the organism. The information should include summaries of: - the identity of the organism; - if it is a genetically modified organism, the source of the donor nucleic acid material and the purpose of the modification; - what the organism will be used for and why it has been selected. Provide a summary of the information contained in this application relating to the assessment of the effects of the organism. The information should include summaries of: - the risks, costs and benefits of releasing the organism and the assessment of these. This summary will be used to provide information for those people and agencies (eg, Minister for the Environment, Department of Conservation, Regional Councils, etc.), who shall be notified of the application, and for potential submittors who request information. This information will also be used to prepare the public notice of the application. For these reasons, applicants should ensure that this summary information does not contain any commercially sensitive material. [Yes] further information Summary In 1994 the Auckland Regional Council, together with the Northland Regional Council, Environment Waikato, and the Department of Conservation, contracted Landcare Research to investigate the feasibility of establishing biological control agents of the weed mist flower in New Zealand. Landcare Research recommended that two agents, the fungus Entyloma ageratinae, and the mist flower gall fly Procecidochares alani, be considered for introduction. Introduction of a third agent, the leaf-feeding moth Oidaematophorus beneficus, was recommended only if the fungus did not establish well in dry sites, as both agents attack the leaves of mist flower. The fungus Entyloma ageratinae was released into New Zealand in November 1998 following approval by the Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry under the Biosecurity Act 1993. The Auckland Regional Council now seeks approval through this application to release from containment the mist flower gall fly, Procecidochares alani Steyskal (Insecta: Diptera: Tephritidae). Mist flower (Ageratina riparia) is a serious plant pest of conservation areas, especially in Northland, 20 Customhouse Quay, Cnr Waring Taylor & Customhouse Quay PO Box 131, Wellington Phone: 04-473 8426 Fax: 04-473 8433 Email: [email protected] Website: www.ermanz.govt.nz ER-AF-NO4-2 7/98 Application for approval to import for release or release from containment any new organism Page 4 under Section 34 of the Hazardous Substances and New Organisms Act 1996 and is invading steadily in Auckland. It grows densely on stream margins, and in the semi-shade under healthy forest. There it forms dense, permanent mats of semi-woody twigs. It can suppress seedling growth, limiting forest regeneration, and is a real threat to the survival of the rare plant communities that live on stream banks in forests. Gall fly larvae feed within the plant, producing galls that slow stem growth and cause dieback. Galls reduce the ability of mist flower to compete with more desirable vegetation. All of the potential risks associated with this proposal have been systematically identified and assessed, and are discussed in the application. The most important risk identified was the potential for the gall fly to damage non-target plants. However, the evidence presented in the application indicates that this risk is negligible or low. Extensive host specificity testing of the mist flower gall fly was carried out by the State Department of Agriculture (Hawai’i) and the Queensland Department of Lands (Australia) prior to the release of this insect in Hawai’i and Australia (Hapai 1977, Wild 1985,1986). These studies showed that the gall fly was highly specific to Ageratina riparia. There have been no adverse effects voiced or recorded in Hawaii or Queensland since these introductions were made. The results of further tests are presented. Using standard techniques, the risk of attack on 25 more plant species was assessed experimentally. The species selected were New Zealand natives, or species with ornamental or economic importance in New Zealand. Sixteen of these plant species were tested in Hawai’i, the remainder in secure containment in New Zealand (ERMA application code NOC98002). As with previous studies, there was no evidence that the gall fly was capable of attacking any plant other than mist flower. Eighty one plant species have now been tested in Hawai’i, Australia and New Zealand. 20 Customhouse Quay, Cnr Waring Taylor & Customhouse Quay PO Box 131, Wellington Phone: 04-473 8426 Fax: 04-473 8433 Email: [email protected] Website: www.ermanz.govt.nz ER-AF-NO4-2 7/98 Application for approval to import for release or release from containment any new organism Page 5 under Section 34 of the Hazardous Substances and New Organisms Act 1996 Organism details 5. The identification of the organism: This should include all information necessary to identify the organism and should include: - the taxonomic classification and name of the organism; - the essential characteristics that identify the organism and its behaviour in the environment; - sufficient information to enable the Authority to uniquely identify the organism in the register as required by section 20(2)(b) of the Act.
Recommended publications
  • Parasitoids of Queensland Fruit Fly Bactrocera Tryoni in Australia and Prospects for Improved Biological Control

    Parasitoids of Queensland Fruit Fly Bactrocera Tryoni in Australia and Prospects for Improved Biological Control

    Insects 2012, 3, 1056-1083; doi:10.3390/insects3041056 OPEN ACCESS insects ISSN 2075-4450 www.mdpi.com/journal/insects/ Review Parasitoids of Queensland Fruit Fly Bactrocera tryoni in Australia and Prospects for Improved Biological Control Ashley L. Zamek 1,, Jennifer E. Spinner 2 Jessica L. Micallef 1, Geoff M. Gurr 3 and Olivia L. Reynolds 4,* 1 Elizabeth Macarthur Agricultural Institute, NSW Department of Primary Industries, Woodbridge Road, Menangle, NSW 2568, Australia; E-Mails: [email protected] (A.L.Z.); [email protected] (J.L.M) 2 EH Graham Centre for Agricultural Innovation, NSW Department of Primary Industries and Charles Sturt University, Locked Bag 588, Wagga Wagga, NSW 2678, Australia; E-Mail: [email protected] 3 EH Graham Centre for Agricultural Innovation, NSW Department of Primary Industries and Charles Sturt University, Charles Sturt University, P.O. Box 883, Orange, NSW 2800, Australia; E-Mail: [email protected] 4 EH Graham Centre for Agricultural Innovation, NSW Department of Primary Industries and Charles Sturt University, Elizabeth Macarthur Agricultural Institute, Woodbridge Road, Menangle, NSW 2568, Australia Present address: Level 1, 1 Phipps Close DEAKIN ACT 2600 Australia. * Author to whom correspondence should be addressed; E-Mail: [email protected]; Tel.: +61-0-2-4640-6426; Fax: +61-0-2-4640-6300. Received: 3 September 2012; in revised form: 4 October 2012 / Accepted: 10 October 2012 / Published: 22 October 2012 Abstract: This review draws together available information on the biology, methods for study, and culturing of hymenopteran parasitoids of the Queensland fruit fly, Bactrocera tryoni, and assesses prospects for improving biological control of this serious pest.
  • 22 329-331.Pdf

    22 329-331.Pdf

    Vol. XXII, No. 2, Sept. 1976 329 Introductions for Biological Control in Hawaii, 1974 H.K. NakaoandG.Y. Funasaki STATE DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE HONOLULU, HAWAII The Entomology Branch of the Hawaii Department of Agriculture has maintained a beneficial organism introduction program for many years. This paper includes a list of insects introduced for biological control during 1974, and gives notes on the status of some pests and their purposely introduced natural enemies. Weed Pest Control Ageratina riparia (Regel) K. & R. (Hamakua pamakani). The stem galling tephritid, Procecidochares alani Steyskal (previously reported as P. near pleuralis Aldrich) was initially released on Hawaii on April 9, 1974 to aid in the control of Hamakua pamakani, a noxious range- land weed. By July, developing galls on stems were observed at various release sites on Hawaii and at Nuuanu, Oahu. The leaf defoliating pterophorid, Oidaematophorus sp., which was initially released in October 1973, has not been recovered to date. Clidemia hirta (L.) (Roster's curse). Light infestations and feeding damage on Clidemia by the leaf rolling pyralid, Blepharomastix ebulealis Guenee were noted in October 1974 along a two-mile stretch on the Kawaiiki Trail, Oahu at an elevation of 1,300 to 1,400 feet. This is the first recovery of this moth since its release in 1971. Insect Pest Control Aleurocanthus spiniferus Quaintance (orange spiny whitefly) Infestations of this aleyrodid were discovered for the first time in the State on foliage of roses in the Kapiolani Rose Garden, Waikiki, Oahu on July 12, 1974. Subsequent surveys revealed scattered light to heavy infestations on roses, citrus, persimmons, grapes and pears in the Waikiki, Kapahulu and Kaimuki areas.
  • Knowledge Gaps, Training Needs and Bio-Ecological Studies on Fruit-Infesting Flies (Diptera: Tephritidae) in Northern Ghana

    Knowledge Gaps, Training Needs and Bio-Ecological Studies on Fruit-Infesting Flies (Diptera: Tephritidae) in Northern Ghana

    University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh KNOWLEDGE GAPS, TRAINING NEEDS AND BIO-ECOLOGICAL STUDIES ON FRUIT-INFESTING FLIES (DIPTERA: TEPHRITIDAE) IN NORTHERN GHANA BY BADII KONGYELI BENJAMIN MASTER OF PHILOSOPHY IN ENTOMOLOGY UNIVERSITY OF GHANA, LEGON, GHANA THIS THESIS IS SUBMITTED TO THE UNIVERSITY OF GHANA, LEGON IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENT FOR THE AWARD OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY CROP SCIENCE (ENTOMOLOGY) DEGREE JULY, 2014 University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh DECLARATION I hereby declare that this thesis is the result of my own original research, and that it has neither in whole nor in part been presented for a degree elsewhere. Works of others which served as sources of information have been duly acknowledged by reference to the authors. Candidate ………………………… Badii Kongyeli Benjamin Principal Supervisor …………………. Co-supervisor ………………….. Prof. Daniel Obeng-Ofori Prof. Kwame Afreh-Nuamah Co-supervisor …………………… Dr. Maxwell Kevin Billah University of Ghana http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This thesis could not have been accomplished without the guidance of my dear supervisors and academic mentors. My supervisors (Prof. Daniel Obeng-Ofori, Prof. Kwame Afreh-Nuamah and Dr. Maxwell K. Billah) offered me the needed encouragement, support and guidance throughout the study. Also, Prof. Gebriel A. Teye (Pro-Vice Chancellor), Prof. George Nyarko (Dean, Faculty of Agriculture), Dr. Elias N. K. Sowley (Director, Academic Quality Assurance Directorate) and Dr. Isaac K. Addai (Head, Department of Agronomy) all of the University for Development Studies (UDS) approved of my leave of study, supported and encouraged me throughout my study. The Head of Department (Mrs. Dr C.
  • Inventory and Review of Quantitative Models for Spread of Plant Pests for Use in Pest Risk Assessment for the EU Territory1

    Inventory and Review of Quantitative Models for Spread of Plant Pests for Use in Pest Risk Assessment for the EU Territory1

    EFSA supporting publication 2015:EN-795 EXTERNAL SCIENTIFIC REPORT Inventory and review of quantitative models for spread of plant pests for use in pest risk assessment for the EU territory1 NERC Centre for Ecology and Hydrology 2 Maclean Building, Benson Lane, Crowmarsh Gifford, Wallingford, OX10 8BB, UK ABSTRACT This report considers the prospects for increasing the use of quantitative models for plant pest spread and dispersal in EFSA Plant Health risk assessments. The agreed major aims were to provide an overview of current modelling approaches and their strengths and weaknesses for risk assessment, and to develop and test a system for risk assessors to select appropriate models for application. First, we conducted an extensive literature review, based on protocols developed for systematic reviews. The review located 468 models for plant pest spread and dispersal and these were entered into a searchable and secure Electronic Model Inventory database. A cluster analysis on how these models were formulated allowed us to identify eight distinct major modelling strategies that were differentiated by the types of pests they were used for and the ways in which they were parameterised and analysed. These strategies varied in their strengths and weaknesses, meaning that no single approach was the most useful for all elements of risk assessment. Therefore we developed a Decision Support Scheme (DSS) to guide model selection. The DSS identifies the most appropriate strategies by weighing up the goals of risk assessment and constraints imposed by lack of data or expertise. Searching and filtering the Electronic Model Inventory then allows the assessor to locate specific models within those strategies that can be applied.
  • De Novo Transcriptome Analysis and Identification of Genes Associated

    De Novo Transcriptome Analysis and Identification of Genes Associated

    RESEARCH ARTICLE De novo transcriptome analysis and identification of genes associated with immunity, detoxification and energy metabolism from the fat body of the tephritid gall fly, Procecidochares utilis 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Lifang LiID , Xi Gao , Mingxian Lan , Yuan Yuan , Zijun Guo , Ping Tang , Mengyue Li , Xianbin Liao1, Jiaying Zhu2, Zhengyue Li1, Min Ye1*, Guoxing Wu1* a1111111111 a1111111111 1 State Key Laboratory for Conservation and Utilization of Bio-Resources in Yunnan, Yunnan Agricultural University, Kunming, China, 2 Key Laboratory of Forest Disaster Warning and Control of Yunnan Province, a1111111111 Southwest Forestry University, Kunming, China a1111111111 a1111111111 * [email protected] (GW); [email protected] (MY) Abstract OPEN ACCESS The fat body, a multifunctional organ analogous to the liver and fat tissue of vertebrates, Citation: Li L, Gao X, Lan M, Yuan Y, Guo Z, Tang plays an important role in insect life cycles. The fat body is involved in protein storage, P, et al. (2019) De novo transcriptome analysis and energy metabolism, elimination of xenobiotics, and production of immunity regulator-like identification of genes associated with immunity, detoxification and energy metabolism from the fat proteins. However, the molecular mechanism of the fat body's physiological functions in the body of the tephritid gall fly, Procecidochares utilis. tephritid stem gall-forming fly, Procecidochares utilis, are still unknown. In this study, we per- PLoS ONE 14(12): e0226039. https://doi.org/ formed transcriptome analysis of the fat body of P. utilis using Illumina sequencing technol- 10.1371/journal.pone.0226039 ogy. In total, 3.71 G of clean reads were obtained and assembled into 30,559 unigenes, with Editor: Alexie Papanicolaou, Western Sydney an average length of 539 bp.
  • De Novo Transcriptomic Analysis of the Alimentary Tract of the Tephritid Gall Fly, Procecidochares Utilis

    De Novo Transcriptomic Analysis of the Alimentary Tract of the Tephritid Gall Fly, Procecidochares Utilis

    RESEARCH ARTICLE De novo transcriptomic analysis of the alimentary tract of the tephritid gall fly, Procecidochares utilis Lifang Li1☯, Mingxian Lan1☯, Wufeng Lu1, Zhaobo Li1, Tao Xia1, Jiaying Zhu2, Min Ye1, Xi Gao1*, Guoxing Wu1* 1 State Key Laboratory for Conservation and Utilization of Bio-Resources in Yunnan, Yunnan Agricultural University, Kunming, China, 2 Key Laboratory of Forest Disaster Warning and Control of Yunnan Province, Southwest Forestry University, Kunming, China a1111111111 ☯ These authors contributed equally to this work. a1111111111 * [email protected] (XG); [email protected] (GW) a1111111111 a1111111111 a1111111111 Abstract The tephritid gall fly, Procecidochares utilis, is an important obligate parasitic insect of the malignant weed Eupatorium adenophorum which biosynthesizes toxic secondary metabo- OPEN ACCESS lites. Insect alimentary tracts secrete several enzymes that are used for detoxification, Citation: Li L, Lan M, Lu W, Li Z, Xia T, Zhu J, et al. including cytochrome P450s, glutathione S-transferases, and carboxylesterases. To (2018) De novo transcriptomic analysis of the explore the adaptation of P. utilis to its toxic host plant, E. adenophorum at molecular level, alimentary tract of the tephritid gall fly, we sequenced the transcriptome of the alimentary tract of P. utilis using Illumina sequenc- Procecidochares utilis. PLoS ONE 13(8): ing. Sequencing and de novo assembly yielded 62,443 high-quality contigs with an average e0201679. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal. pone.0201679 length of 604 bp that were further
  • Field Release of Cecidochares (Procecidochares) Connexa Macquart (Diptera:Tephritidae)

    Field Release of Cecidochares (Procecidochares) Connexa Macquart (Diptera:Tephritidae)

    Field Release of Cecidochares (Procecidochares) connexa Macquart (Diptera:Tephritidae), a non-indigenous, gall-making fly for control of Siam weed, Chromolaena odorata (L.) King and Robinson (Asteraceae) in Guam and the Northern Mariana Islands Environmental Assessment February 2002 Agency Contact: Tracy A. Horner, Ph.D. USDA-Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service Permits and Risk Assessment Riverdale, MD 20137-1236 301-734-5213 301-734-8700 FAX Proposed Action: The U. S. Department of Agriculture (USDA), Animal and Plant Health Insepction Service (APHIS) is proposing to issue a permit for the release of the nonindigenous fly, Cecidochares (Procecidochares) connexa Macquart (Diptera:Tephritidae). The agent would be used by the applicant for the biological control of Siam weed, Chromolaena odorata (Asteraceae), in Guam and the Northern Mariana Islands . Type of Statement: Environmental Assessment For Further Information: Tracy A. Horner, Ph.D. 1. Purpose and Need for Action 1.1 The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA), Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service (APHIS) is proposing to issue a permit for release of a nonindigenous fly, Cecidochares (Procecidochares) connexa Macquart (Diptera: Tephritidae). The agent would be used by the applicant for the biological control of Siam weed, Chromolaena odorata (L.) King and Robinson, (Asteraceae) in Guam and the Northern Mariana Islands. C. connexa is a gall forming fly. Adults live for up to 14 days and are active in the morning, mating on Siam weed and then ovipositing in the buds. The ovipositor is inserted through the bud leaves and masses of 5 to 20 eggs are laid in the bud tip or between the bud leaves.
  • Fruit Flies (Dip.: Tephritidae) Reared from Capitula of Asteraceae in the Urmia Region, Iran

    Fruit Flies (Dip.: Tephritidae) Reared from Capitula of Asteraceae in the Urmia Region, Iran

    J o u r n a l o f E n t o m o l o g i c a l S o c i e t y o f I r a n 53 2011, 30(2), 53-66 Fruit flies (Dip.: Tephritidae) reared from capitula of Asteraceae in the Urmia region, Iran Y. Karimpour Department of Plant Protection, Faculty of Agriculture, Urmia University, P.O. Box 165, Urmia, Iran, E-mail: [email protected] Abstract A list of 20 species of the subfamily Tephritinae (Diptera: Tephritidae) from the Urmia region (Azarbaijan-e Gharbi province, Iran) is presented. The specimens were collected during 2005-2008 from six different localities. Adults were obtained from overwintering and mature seed heads of 17 plant species of Asteraceae. The species, Urophora xanthippe (Munro, 1934) is newly recorded for the fauna of Iran. Thirteen new host plants are also reported for the first time. The host plants, collection date, locality as well as general distribution and associated plants of each species are given. Key words: Tephritidae, fauna, Asteraceae, host plants, fruit flies, Urmia, Iran Tephritinae (Diptera: Tephritidae) ƵŶǀƨģ ƱŚŤºſř ƶǀƯƹŹřƽƶ ƤƐƴƯŻř ƽƵŵřƺƳŚųźƿŻƽŚƷž ĮƯŻřƶƳƺĭçåƪƯŚƃƾŤſźƸƟ ƽƶ ƤƐƴƯƂƃŻřæèíìŚţæèíÑƽŚƷƩŚſŹŵƵŶƃƭŚŬƳřƽŚƷƾſŹźŝƩƺƏŹŵŚƷƶƳƺĭƲƿřŢſřƵŶƃƾƟźƘƯ ƾŝźƛƱŚŬƿŚŝŹŷō ƾƷŚǀĭƽƶ ƳƺĭæìƚƫŚŝƹƱřŹŸĭƱ ŚŤƀƯŻƽŚƷƢ ŞƏŻřơƺƟƽŚƷƶ ƳƺĭƪƯŚƧšřźƄůŶƳŶƃƽŹƹōƖưūƶǀƯƹŹřƝřźƏřŹŵƞƬŤŴƯ Urophora xanthippe (Munro, 1934) (Asteraceae) ƱřźºƿřƱƺºƟƽřźºŝ ŚƷƱ ōƲǀŝŻřƶƧŶƳŶƯōŢſŵƶ ŝ ƱřŵźĮŝŚŤƟōƽƵźǀţ ƹŲƿŹŚţƱŚŝżǀƯƱŚƷŚǀĭŶƳƺƃƾ ƯƁŹřżĭƵŵřƺƳŚųƲƿřƽŚƷž ĮƯƽřźŝŶƿŶūƱŚŝżǀƯƱřƺƴƗƶŝƾƷŚǀĭƽƶ ƳƺĭæèƹƵŵƺŝŶƿŶū ŢſřƵŶƃƶŗřŹřƶƳƺĭźƷŚŝƎŞţźƯƱŚƷŚǀĭƹƾƯƺưƗŹŚƄŤƳřƽƵŻƺůƵřźưƷƶŝƶƤƐƴƯŹŵŚƷž ĮƯƲƿřƽŹƹōƖ ưūƪŰƯ Asteraceae Tephritidae ƱřźƿřƶǀƯƹŹřƵƺǀƯƽŚƷž ĮƯƾƷŚǀĭƽŚƷƱ ŚŝżǀƯ ƱƺƟƽŶǀƬƧƱŚĭĥřƹ Introduction Fruit flies (Tephritidae) are cosmopolitan and also one of the largest families of acalypterate Diptera, comprising over 4300 valid species worldwide (Norrbom, 2004). They contain medium sized flies with often a characteristic wing patterns (Foote & Steyskal, 1987; White & Elson-Harris, 1992).
  • Terms of Reference for a Report Assessing the Impact of Importing the Gall Fly Cecidochares Connexa for the Biological Control of Chromolaena Odorata

    Terms of Reference for a Report Assessing the Impact of Importing the Gall Fly Cecidochares Connexa for the Biological Control of Chromolaena Odorata

    Terms of Reference for a report assessing the impact of importing the gall fly Cecidochares connexa for the biological control of Chromolaena odorata The terms of reference set out below outlines the reporting requirements for assessing the potential impact on the environment of amending the ‘List of Specimens Suitable for Live Import’ for the purposes of the Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999, to include the gall fly Cecidochares connexa (Macquart) (Diptera: Tephritidae) for the potential biological control of chromolaena, Chromolaena odorata (L.) King & Robinson (Asteraceae). 1. Summary of the proposed activity, including the proposed source of the agent, the number of individuals to be imported and the way in which the specimen(s) will be kept and transported within Australia and disposed of. Chromolaena odorata is a Class 1 weed in Queensland and the target of a national cost-share eradication program. In a recent review of the program, it was recommended that biocontrol be implemented to assist in the control and containment of the weed. The gall fly Cecidochares connexa, has been tested in four countries against a total of 79 plant species, representing 18 families, including 22 species in the family Asteraceae and five of these in the tribe Eupatorieae. C. connexa is highly host specific, not attacking any other species and is a very effective agent, controlling or aiding the control of chromolaena in PNG, Indonesia, Guam, Micronesia and Timor Leste. The gall fly will be imported from PNG as mature larvae or pupae in mature galls in double sealed containers into the quarantine unit at the Ecosciences Precinct, Brisbane.
  • Ceratitis Capitata) in Hawaii

    Ceratitis Capitata) in Hawaii

    Field Release of the parasitoid Fopius ceratitivorus for Biological Control of Mediterranean fruit fly (Ceratitis capitata) in Hawaii Final Environmental Assessment August 2014 Proposing Agency contact: Dr. Russell Messing, University of Hawaii at Manoa Kauai Agricultural Research Station 7370 Kuamoo Rd., Kapaa, HI 96746 tel: 808-822-4984 x223. fax: 808-822-2190. email: [email protected] Determining Agency contact: Dr. Brian Taylor Office of the Vice Chancellor for Research University of Hawaiʻi at Mānoa; Hawaiʻi Hall 211 2500 Campus Road Honolulu, HI 96822 tel: 808-956-7837 email: [email protected] I. Proposed Action A. Summary The University has submitted an application to the Hawaii Department of Agriculture (HDOA) Plant Quarantine Branch, 1849 Auiki Street, Honolulu, HI 96819 and the Board of Agriculture for a permit to release Fopius ceratitivorus (Hymenoptera: Braconidae) into the environment of the State of Hawai`i under the provisions of Hawaii Revised Statutes, Chapter 141, Department of Agriculture, and Chapter 150A, Plant and Non-Domestic Animal Quarantine. We are seeking to release from quarantine the host specific parasitoid F. ceratitivorus for enhanced biological control of the Mediterranean fruit fly, Ceratitis capitata (Diptera: Tephritidae) in coffee and other cropping systems throughout Hawai`i. This Final Environmental Assessment was prepared by the applicant for the Office of Environmental Quality Control (OEQC), Department of Health, State of Hawaii, to comply with the provisions of Hawai`i Revised Statutes, Chapter 343, Environmental Impact Statements. B. Identification of Applicant Dr. Russell Messing University of Hawaii at Manoa Kauai Agricultural Research Station 7370 Kuamoo Rd., Kapaa, HI 96746 tel: 808-822-4984 x223.
  • Taxonomy and Biology of Economically Important Fruit Flies of India

    Taxonomy and Biology of Economically Important Fruit Flies of India

    BIOTAXONOMY OF TEPHRITOIDEA Isr. J. Entomol. Vol. 35-36, 2005/6, pp. 459-475 Taxonomy and Biology of Economically Important Fruit Flies of India V.C. Kapoor ABSTRACT The major fruit fly pests in India belong to the genus Bactrocera: B. cucurbitae (Coquillett), B. dorsalis (Hendel) and B. zonata (Saunders). Other species of Bactrocera, such as B. correcta (Bezzi), B. diversa (Coquillett) and B. latifrons (Hendel), although moderate pests, are localized in their distribution. B. correcta is occasionally reported to dominate B. zonata and B. dorsalis on mango. To date, five or six species of the B. dorsalis complex have been recorded in India, and at least 10 species may occur there, as well as three or four species of the B. zonata complex. B. tau (Walker) and B. scutellaris (Bezzi) have not been recognized even as moderate pests, whereas B. caudata (Walker) is still not fully confirmed in India. The pest status of B. oleae Gmelin has not yet been determined by the olive growers. Dacus ciliatus Loew sometimes becomes a serious pest of squash melons, dominating B. cucurbitae. Amongst the non-dacine species, the capsule fly, Acanthiophilus helianthi (Rossi), and Carpomya vesuviana (Costa) are cause of concern: outbreaks of the capsule fly are sometimes serious on safflower, and C. vesuviana (ber fly) appears to be becoming a major pest of ber. The useful fruit flies include some species that damage local weeds. Procecidochares utilis (Stone), a native of Mexico, is well established on crofton weed. Several other useful fruit fly species, such as Dacus persicus Hendel, Ensina sonchi (Linnaeus), Urophora stylata (Fabricius), and D.
  • حشرات( (Research Paper (Natural Enemies: Insects

    حشرات( (Research Paper (Natural Enemies: Insects

    بحـوث )أعداء طبيعية: حشرات( (Research Paper (Natural Enemies: Insects حصر ﻷنواع ذباب الثمار والمتطفﻻت الحشرية المصاحبة له على عدد من أعشاب العائلة النجمية في جنوبي سورية عبد النبي بشير، لؤي أصﻻن، غسان إبراهيم وفائق عبد الرزاق مركز بحوث ودراسات المكافحة الحيوية (BCSRC)، كليّة الزراعة، جامعة دمشق، سورية، البريد اﻹلكتروني: [email protected] الملخص بشير، عبد النبي، لؤي أصﻻن، غسان إبراهيم، وفائق عبد الرزاق. 2016. حصر ﻷنواع ذباب الثمار والمتطفﻻت الحشرية المصاحبة له على عدد من أعشاب العائلة النجمية في جنوبي سورية. مجلة وقاية النبات العربية، 34)3(: 179-167. جمعت عيّنات نباتية وحشرية من أكثر أنواع اﻷعشاب التابعة للعائلة النجميّة Asteraceae شيوعًا في مواطن مختلفة من محافظات دمشق وريفها والسويداء جنوبيّ سورية عام 2014. عُرّفت ووصفت العينات النباتية والحشرية المنبثقة عنها سواء كانت حشرات ذباب الثمار أو متطفﻻت حشرية مصاحبة لها. انبثقت خمسة أنواع من ذباب الثمار من اﻷقراص الزهرية للنباتات التابعة للعائلة النجمية هي Chaetorellia carthami ،Acanthiophilus helianthi، Oralla colon ،Chaetostomella cylindrica و Trupanea amoena، باﻹضافة إلى نوعين تم جمعهما بوساطة الشبكة الكانسة هما Tephritis luteipes و.Urophora sp. سجّلت سبعة أنواع من المتطفﻻت الحشرية على أنواع ذباب الثمار السابقة وتشمل Eurytoma ،B. intercessor ،Bracon luteator E. martelli ،varicolor وTorymus rubi باﻹضافة إلى .Eurytoma sp و.Torymus sp. كلمات مفتاحية: ذباب الثمار، متطفﻻت حشرية، العائلة النجمية، سورية المقدمة1 الحقل اﻷصفر .Centaurea solstitialis L في كاليفورنيا )التي انتقل إليها قبل أكثر من 170 سنة( بعد أن تبين أن C. succinea تصيب تصاب نباتات العائلة النجميّة Asteraceae بالعديد من أنواع ذباب محصول العصفر. بلغ معدل اﻹصابة على اﻷقراص الزهرية الثمار من فصيلة Tephritidae، إذ يتخصص معظم أنواع تحت للعصفر 8.3% عام 1997، وسببت اﻹصابة انخفاض عدد البذور الفصيلة Tephritinae في إصابة نباتات العائلة النجمية.