DOCSLIB.ORG

A Summary by Watershed for 1991

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
A Summary by Watershed for 1991 THE NATIONAL COASTAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE INVENTORY Gulf of Maine Point Source Inventory A Summary by Watershed for 1991 Gulf of St. Lawrence Gulf of Maine December 1994 Pollution Sources Characterization Branch Strategic Environmental Assessments Division National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Silver Spring, MD 20910 Project Team Percy A. Pacheco, Project Leader Anthony S. Pait- Report author Sheila J. Arenstam- Programming and analysis Alice E. DeSouza - GIS analysis and support Daniel R.G. Farrow - Technical review Jamie Higgins - Graphics support Gulf of Maine Point Source Inventory This document presents the results of the first phase of NOAA's Gulf of Maine Project, completed in December 1994. The information contained within the database and this report reflect the comments and additional data provided by the reviewers during the summer of 1994. Direct any comments, questions or problems relating to the National Coastal Pollutant Discharge Inventory (NCPDI) Point Source Inventory to Percy A. Pacheco or Daniel R. G. Farrow at the address on the inside of the back cover. Acknowledgments The Project Team wishes to thank those individuals in the five jurisdictions of the Gulf of Maine Program who reviewed the data and the draft of this report. The comments and the additional data they supplied improved the reliability of the Point Source Inven­ tory. The Project Team would also like to acknowl­ edge the support provided by NOAA's Coastal Ocean Program and Region I of the EPA. Finally, the Team would like thank our colleagues in the Strate­ gic Environmental Assessments Division for their contributions in completing this project, particularly Manyu Swain and John J. Hayes for assisting in the data review, and Mitchell J. Katz for his editorial comments. Introduction .............................................................................................: .............................................................. 1 Results ..................................................................................................................................................................... 5 Data Sources ........................................................................................................................................................... 8 U.S. and Canadian Data Variables ...................................................................................................................... 9 Load Estimation Methods .................................................. :..... ................................................................: ........... 9 How Good is the Inventory? ................................................................................................................................ 10 How Can the Inventory be Improved? ............................................................................................................... 11 Appendices 1. Individual Facility Characteristics, Annual Pollutant Load Estimates, and Basis of Estimates for Major and Significant Minor Facilities, 1991 ................................................................ 1-1 2. Top Ten Dischargers by Pollutant, 1991 ................................................................................................ 2-1 3. Pollutant Loads by Major Source Category and Percent of Annual Discharge by Watershed, 1991 .................................................................................................................................. 3-1 4. Percent of Pollutant Discharge Estimate Based on Monitored (M), Permit (P), Typical (T), or Other (0) Data by Major Source Category and Watershed, 1991 .................................................... 4-1 5. Percent of Pollutant Discharges Estimated by Different Data Sources ............................................ 5-1 6. Number of Facilities in Watersheds by Two-Digit SIC Major Group, 1991 ..................................... 6-1 7. Distribution of Facilities in the Study Area by Four-Digit SIC Code, 1991 ..................................... 7-1 8. Maps ofMajor and Significant Minor Point Source Facilities in the Gulf of Maine Study Area ................................................................................................................................ 8-1 9. Watersheds in the Gulf of Maine Study Area ....................................................................................... 9-1 10. Hydrologic Cataloging Units in the Gulf of Maine Study Area ...................................................... 1Q-1 11. Counties in the Gulf of Maine Study Area ......................................................................................... 11-1 12. County and Hydrologic Cataloging Unit Cross Reference Table for the Gulf of Maine Watersheds .................................................................................................................................. 12-1 13. Differences Between Canadian and U.S. Data Variables in the Gulf of Maine Point Source Inventory .......................................................................................................................... 13-1 14. Glossary ................................................................................................................................................... 14-1 Figures 1. Study Area for the Gulf of Maine Point Source Inventory ..................................................................3 2. Number of Point Source Facilities by Watershed and Major Point Source Category in the Gulf of Maine Study Area, 1991 ....................................................................................................... 6 3. Annual Process Flow by Watershed and Major Point Source Category in the Gulf of Maine Study Area, 1991 ........................................................................................................................... 7 4. Basis of Loading Estimates for Selected Pollutants in the U.S. Portion of the Gulf of Maine Study Area, 1991 ........................................................................................................................................ 8 5. Basis of Loading Estimates for Selected Pollutants in the Canadian Portion of the Gulf of Maine Study Area, 1991 ...................................................................................................................... 9 Table 1. Pollutants in the NCPDI Gulf of Maine Inventory ............................................................................... 2 Gulfof Maine Point Source Inventory December 1994 source dischargers by watershed. Inventory is maintained within jlntroduction The information contained within NOAA's National Coastal the report can provide resource Pollutant Discharge Inventory This report summarizes the managers with valuable insights (NCPDI), and is available on two information contained in the Gulf as to which facilities are impor­ IBM-compatible floppy diskettes of Maine Point Source Inventory tant contributors of pollutant (3.5-inch) in an ASCII format. (hereafter, the "Inventory"). The dis~rges to the coastal waters The seven deliverable files Inventory includes structural of the Gulf of Maine. archived on the two diskettes data and pollutant discharge contain facility information and estimates for 273 major and 1,751 The report and Inventory were pollutant discharge estimates by minor direct discharging point compiled by the Pollution facility and individual pipe. source facilities located in the U.S. and Canadian watersheds Contents and Organization. This draining to the Gulf of Maine. • The NCPDI GulfofMainestudy report is organized into two Estimates of annual and seasonal major sections. The first contains discharges are made for 15 area comprises (Tf}er 68,000square miles. an analysis of the data; the pollutants for a base year of 1991, second a series of detailed using a combination of monitor­ • The 1990 papulation within the appendices. The first section ing data, permit limits, and includes a characterization of the typical engineering values. studyareawasapproximately6.8 million. point source dischargers in the Gulf of Maine, along with This report and the digital discussions on data sources, • .Ther~ are 1,553 direct discharg­ da~abase on which the report is differences between U.S. and based were developed as part of mg mdustrial facilities, 378 wastewater treatment plants Canadian data, estimation an interagency agreement methods, an assessment of data between the National Oceanic (WWI'Ps), and 93 power plants in the Gulf of Maine. quality including limitations, and and Atmospheric Administration potential ways of improving the (NOAA) and the U.S. Environ­ Inventory. Discharge estimates mental Protection Agency (EPA), • WWTPs and paper mills are the largest dischargers of pollutants. are aggregated by watershed to build a point source inventory rather than by county so that for the Gulf of Maine Program. estimates can be more easily The program was organized in • The Deer Island/Nut Island WWTP complex in Boston,Mas­ related to water quality impacts 1989 as a cooperative effort in each watershed. between Federal and State (or ~husef!S is the single largest smgle dtscharger fiJr the major­ Provincial) agencies in the United The 14 appendices in this report States and Canada to address and ity of pollutants in the lnven- ~· . contain individual facility act upon environmental issues of characteristics and annual concern, such as the sustainable pollutant load estimates; list, for
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Preliminary Flood Insurance Study
    VOLUME 4 OF 4 YORK COUNTY, MAINE (ALL JURISDICTIONS) COMMUNITY NAME NUMBER COMMUNITY NAME NUMBER ACTON, TOWN OF 230190 OGUNQUIT, TOWN OF 230632 ALFRED, TOWN OF 230191 OLD ORCHARD BEACH, TOWN OF 230153 ARUNDEL, TOWN Of 230192 PARSONSFIELD, TOWN OF 230154 BERWICK, TOWN OF 230144 SACO, CITY OF 230155 BIDDEFORD, CITY OF 230145 SANFORD, CITY OF 230156 BUXTON, TOWN OF 230146 SHAPLEIGH, TOWN OF 230198 CORNISH, TOWN OF 230147 SOUTH BERWICK, TOWN OF 230157 DAYTON, TOWN OF 230148 WATERBORO, TOWN OF 230199 ELIOT, TOWN OF 230149 WELLS, TOWN OF 230158 HOLLIS, TOWN OF 230150 YORK, TOWN OF 230159 KENNEBUNK, TOWN OF 230151 KENNEBUNKPORT, TOWN OF 230170 KITTERY, TOWN OF 230171 LEBANON, TOWN OF 230193 LIMERICK, TOWN OF 230194 LIMINGTON, TOWN OF 230152 LYMAN, TOWN OF 230195 NEWFIELD, TOWN OF 230196 NORTH BERWICK, TOWN OF 230197 EFFECTIVE: FLOOD INSURANCE STUDY NUMBER 23005CV004A Version Number 2.3.2.1 TABLE OF CONTENTS Volume 1 Page SECTION 1.0 – INTRODUCTION 1 1.1 The National Flood Insurance Program 1 1.2 Purpose of this Flood Insurance Study Report 2 1.3 Jurisdictions Included in the Flood Insurance Study Project 2 1.4 Considerations for using this Flood Insurance Study Report 20 SECTION 2.0 – FLOODPLAIN MANAGEMENT APPLICATIONS 31 2.1 Floodplain Boundaries 31 2.2 Floodways 43 2.3 Base Flood Elevations 44 2.4 Non-Encroachment Zones 44 2.5 Coastal Flood Hazard Areas 45 2.5.1 Water Elevations and the Effects of Waves 45 2.5.2 Floodplain Boundaries and BFEs for Coastal Areas 46 2.5.3 Coastal High Hazard Areas 47 2.5.4 Limit of Moderate Wave Action 48 SECTION
    [Show full text]
  • Status of Conservation Planning for Watersheds of Southern Maine
    watermark volume 26 issue 1 5 stewardship / conserving natural resources Status of Conservation Planning for Watersheds of Southern Maine The Wells Reserve has produced or assisted with every key conservation planning document prepared for What is a watershed? southern Maine watersheds over the past decade. Use this chart to learn which plans cover your town, then An area in which water, sediments, download the plan(s) from our website or read them at the Dorothy Fish Coastal Resource Library. and dissolved material drain to a To get involved in land or water protection in your area, contact the individuals or organizations named common outlet, such as a river, lake, in the plans. Key contacts for most towns and watersheds can also be found at swim.wellsreserve.org. If these bay, or ocean. avenues don’t work out, call the Wells Reserve stewardship coordinator, Tin Smith, at 646-1555 ext 119. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Watershed A geographic area in which water flows on its way to a larger water body, such as a stream, river, estuary, lake, or Town Bridges Swamp Neddick River Cape River Works Great Josias River Kennebunk River Little River Mousam River Ogunquit River River Piscataqua River Salmon Falls Southside Brook Creek Spruce River Webhannet River York ocean. Coastal and ocean resources Acton 7 11 are affected not only by activities in Alfred 4 7 coastal areas but also by those in Arundel 4 7 upland watersheds. Berwick 2,3 2,11 U.S. Commission on Ocean Policy Eliot 2,11 2,11 2,13,14 2,16,17 Kennebunk 4 5,6 7 Kennebunkport 4 Why these watersheds? Kittery 11 11 0 13,14 16,17 The chart shows the Maine watersheds Lebanon 11 and towns that are included in the web- Lyman 4 7 based Seacoast Watershed Information North Berwick 2,3 2,11 Manager (swim.wellsreserve.org).
    [Show full text]
  • A Review of Ice and Tide Observations in the Bay of Fundy
    A tlantic Geology 195 A review of ice and tide observations in the Bay of Fundy ConDesplanque1 and David J. Mossman2 127 Harding Avenue, Amherst, Nova Scotia B4H 2A8, Canada departm ent of Physics, Engineering and Geoscience, Mount Allison University, 67 York Street, Sackville, New Brunswick E4L 1E6, Canada Date Received April 27, 1998 Date Accepted December 15,1998 Vigorous quasi-equilibrium conditions characterize interactions between land and sea in macrotidal regions. Ephemeral on the scale of geologic time, estuaries around the Bay of Fundy progressively infill with sediments as eustatic sea level rises, forcing fringing salt marshes to form and reform at successively higher levels. Although closely linked to a regime of tides with large amplitude and strong tidal currents, salt marshes near the Bay of Fundy rarely experience overflow. Built up to a level about 1.2 m lower than the highest astronomical tide, only very large tides are able to cover the marshes with a significant depth of water. Peak tides arrive in sets at periods of 7 months, 4.53 years and 18.03 years. Consequently, for months on end, no tidal flooding of the marshes occurs. Most salt marshes are raised to the level of the average tide of the 18-year cycle. The number of tides that can exceed a certain elevation in any given year depends on whether the three main tide-generating factors peak at the same time. Marigrams constructed for the Shubenacadie and Cornwallis river estuaries, Nova Scotia, illustrate how the estuarine tidal wave is reshaped over its course, to form bores, and varies in its sediment-carrying and erosional capacity as a result of changing water-surface gradients.
    [Show full text]
  • 2019 Bay of Fundy Guide
    VISITOR AND ACTIVITY GUIDE 2019–2020 BAYNova OF FUNDYScotia’s & ANNAPOLIS VALLEY TIDE TIMES pages 13–16 TWO STUNNING PROVINCES. ONE CONVENIENT CROSSING. Digby, NS – Saint John, NB Experience the phenomenal Bay of Fundy in comfort aboard mv Fundy Rose on a two-hour journey between Nova Scotia and New Brunswick. Ferries.ca Find Yourself on the Cliffs of Fundy TWO STUNNING PROVINCES. ONE CONVENIENT CROSSING. Digby, NS – Saint John, NB Isle Haute - Bay of Fundy Experience the phenomenal Bay of Fundy in comfort aboard mv Fundy Rose on a two-hour journey between Nova Scotia Take the scenic route and fi nd yourself surrounded by the and New Brunswick. natural beauty and rugged charm scattered along the Fundy Shore. Find yourself on the “Cliffs of Fundy” Cape D’or - Advocate Harbour Ferries.ca www.fundygeopark.ca www.facebook.com/fundygeopark Table of Contents Near Parrsboro General Information .................................. 7 Top 5 One-of-a-Kind Shopping ........... 33 Internet Access .................................... 7 Top 5 Heritage and Cultural Smoke-free Places ............................... 7 Attractions .................................34–35 Visitor Information Centres ................... 8 Tidally Awesome (Truro to Avondale) ....36–43 Important Numbers ............................. 8 Recommended Scenic Drive ............... 36 Map ............................................... 10–11 Top 5 Photo Opportunities ................. 37 Approximate Touring Distances Top Outdoor Activities ..................38–39 Along Scenic Route .........................10
    [Show full text]
  • The Annapolis Basin Scallop Fishery: a Historical Perspective and 1993 Stock Assessment
    Scientific Excellence • Resource Protection & Conservation • Benefits for Canadians Excellence scientifique • Protection et conservation des ressources • Bénéfices aux Canadiens DFO Library MPO - Bbliothèque III IIIIHIIIIJIIII II I/9-- - 12022666 The Annapolis Basin Scallop Fishery: A Historical Perspective and 1993 Stock Assessment E. L. Kenchington and M. J. Lundy Benthic Fisheries and Aquaculture Division Biological Sciences Branch Department of Fisheries and Oceans P.O. Box 550 Halifax, Nova Scotia B3J 2S7 1994 Canadian Manuscript Report of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences No. 2230 5-é-/ 23 Fisheries Pêches 1+1 and Oceans et Océans Canada. Canadian Manuscript Report of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences Manuscript reports contain scientific and technical information that contributes to existing knowledge but which deals with national or regional problems. Distribu- tion is restricted to institutions or individuals located in particular regions of Canada. However, no restriction is placed on subject matter, and the series reflects the broad interests and policies of the Department of Fisheries and Oceans, namely, fisheries and aquatic sciences. Manuscript reports may be cited as full publications. The correct citation appears above the abstract of each report. Each report is abstracted in Aquatic Sciences and Fisherics Abstracts and indexed in the Department's annual index to scientific and technical publications. Numbers 1-900 in this series were issued as Manuscript Reports (Biological Series) of the Biological Board of Canada, and subsequent to 1937 when the name of the Board was changed by Act of Parliament, as Manuscript Reports ( Biological Series) of the Fisherics Research Board of Canada. Numbers 901-1425 were issued as Manuscript Reports of the Fisheries Research Board of Canada.
    [Show full text]
  • Nonpoint Source Priority Watersheds List MARINE WATERS
    Maine Department of Environmental Protection February 2019 Nonpoint Source Priority Watersheds List MARINE WATERS Impaired* Marine Waters Priority List (34 marine waters) Marine Water Area/Town Priority List Reasoning Anthoine Creek & Cove South Portland Negative Water Quality Indicators (FOCB) Broad Cove Cushing DMR/NPS Threat Bunganuc Creek Brunswick CBEP Priority Water Cape Neddick River York MS4 Priority Water Churches Rock So. Thomaston DMR/NPS Threat Egypt Bay Hancock/Franklin DMR/NPS Threat Goosefare Bay Kennebunkport MHB Priority Water, MS4 Priority Water Harpswell Cove Brunswick CBEP Priority Water Harraseeket River Freeport DMR/NPS Threat Hutchins Cove Bagaduce River / DMR/NPS Threat Northern Bay (Penobscot) Hyler Cove Cushing DMR/NPS Threat Kennebunk River Kennebunk MHB Priority Water Little River and Bay Freeport CBEP Priority Water Littlefield Cove Bagaduce River / DMR/NPS Threat Northern Bay (Penobscot) Maquoit Bay Brunswick CBEP Priority Water Martin Cove Lamoine DMR/NPS Threat Medomak River Estuary Waldoboro DMR/NPS Threat Mill Cove South Portland Negative Water Quality Indicators Mill Pond/Parker Head Phippsburg DMR/NPS Threat Mussell Cove Falmouth CBEP Priority Water, DMR/NPS Threat North Fogg Point Freeport CBEP Priority Water Northeast Creek Bar Harbor DMR/NPS Threat Oakhurst Island Harpswell CBEP Priority Water Ogunquit River Estuary Ogunquit MHB Priority Water, DMR/NPS Threat Pemaquid River Bristol DMR/NPS Threat Salt Pond Blue Hill/Sedgwick DMR/NPS Threat, MERI Scarborough River Estuary Scarborough DMR/NPS Threat Spinney Creek Eliot MS4 Priority Water, Negative Water Quality Indicators Spruce Creek Kittery MS4 Priority Water, Negative Water Quality Indicators Page 1 of 2 MDEP NPS Priority Watersheds List – MARINE WATERS February 2019 Marine Water Area/Town Priority List Reasoning Spurwink River Scarborough MHB Priority Water, DMR/NPS Threat St.
    [Show full text]
  • Annapolis Basin Bay of Fundy Estuary Profile Annapolis Basin
    Bay of Fundy Estuary Profiles Annapolis Basin Bay of Fundy Estuary Profile Annapolis Basin The Annapolis Basin is a sub-basin of the Bay of Fundy along the northwestern shore of Nova Scotia and at the western end of the Annapolis Valley. The Annapolis River is the major water source flowing into the estuary. At the NB mouth of the estuary, a narrow channel known as the Digby Gut connects the 44 NS estuary to the Bay of Fundy. Annapolis Royal and Digby are the main communities along the shore of the estuary, and Kingston-Greenwood is within the catchment area. Near Digby, there is a ferry port that connects to Saint John, New Brunswick. The estuary also hosts a tidal power generating station, which is near Annapolis Royal. The economy within the catchment area is largely driven by agriculture. However, Estuary surface area 104.07 km2 there are also several shellfish and finfish aquaculture tenures, and some Width at estuary mouth 1.85 km commercial fisheries near the mouth of the estuary that largely target Shoreline length 200.63 km invertebrates such as crab, lobster, and clams that inhabit tidal mudflats. The Catchment area 2322.05 km2 extensive tidal mudflats within the estuary are important habitat for Shorebird colonies 2 shorebirds. Within the catchment area there is freshwater habitat for wood Protected area 94.81 km2 turtles, and two protected areas that overlap with the landward boundary of Paved roads 1028 km the estuary. Although the upper valley is primarily agricultural land, much of Aquaculture leases 10 the rest of the catchment area is covered by forest.
    [Show full text]
  • SMPDC Region
    Southern Maine Regional Planning Commission Region Shelburne Batchelders Grant Twp Woodstock Sumner Hartford Mason Twp Beans Purchase Greenwood West Paris Miles Knob !! Miles Notch Number Eight Pond ! Albany Twp Shirley Brook ! Speckled Mountain ! Red Rock Brook Pine Mountain ! ! Lombard Pond ! Isaiah Mountain 3 ! 1 1 Hannah Brook E ! ! Ha T Stoneham ! y R R Sugarloaf Mountain d Willard Brook ! Goodwin Brook T Sugarloaf Mountain S ! B W Virginia Lake in Basin Brook ir Buckfield Brickett Place ! c B ! ! H h ! ro u Cecil Mountain w t A n R ! v R Bickford Brook d Co d d ld ! ! R Bro ok T rl B k Bartlett Brook o d a o R ! n r llen u C G B Beaver Brook ! d r r Mason Hill o Palmer Mountain M d o ! v f o d ! e u R k R r S n r c d i to t n a R e H A ld e R B o in u d k se Rattlesnake Mountain e d r i r Rd ! R Little Pond a f e a t d d m W e ! tl is R B l d t d s i d l n S L R A R l Rattlesnake Brook R n R il M A c ! I t ! a ! o B H in s ! d rs l e n e n r ! e l M S i a t e t d t Adams Mountain id e d u Shell Pond u l B n o l d h e Harding Hill o S o ! a y R R P G m d W d Stiles Mountain d d Great B!rook o Pine Hill R ! n n R ! R d ! y o n ! lle P Pine Hill d R a ee Cold B!rook d Pike's Peak V ll K n e c ! Foster Hill Little Deer HillDeer Hill ee h M Birch Island ! ! ! ! r S ! rg oe Mud Pond Upper Bay ve J Bradley Pond E ! Sheep Islan!d A ! ! nd Amos Mountain C Allen Mountain Paris re ! us ! n w Flat Hill h Rattlesnake Island L s m L ! Deer Hill Spring Harndon Hill Horseshoe Pond r n a Trout Pond ! ! ! e n W d P ! lm o ! Weymouth HillWeymouth
    [Show full text]
  • FIS Report Template May 2016 Draft
    VOLUME 2 OF 4 YORK COUNTY, MAINE (ALL JURISDICTIONS) COMMUNITY NAME NUMBER COMMUNITY NAME NUMBER ACTON, TOWN OF 230190 OGUNQUIT, TOWN OF 230632 ALFRED, TOWN OF 230191 OLD ORCHARD BEACH, TOWN OF 230153 ARUNDEL, TOWN Of 230192 PARSONSFIELD, TOWN OF 230154 BERWICK, TOWN OF 230144 SACO, CITY OF 230155 BIDDEFORD, CITY OF 230145 SANFORD, CITY OF 230156 BUXTON, TOWN OF 230146 SHAPLEIGH, TOWN OF 230198 CORNISH, TOWN OF 230147 SOUTH BERWICK, TOWN OF 230157 DAYTON, TOWN OF 230148 WATERBORO, TOWN OF 230199 ELIOT, TOWN OF 230149 WELLS, TOWN OF 230158 HOLLIS, TOWN OF 230150 YORK, TOWN OF 230159 KENNEBUNK, TOWN OF 230151 KENNEBUNKPORT, TOWN OF 230170 KITTERY, TOWN OF 230171 LEBANON, TOWN OF 230193 LIMERICK, TOWN OF 230194 LIMINGTON, TOWN OF 230152 LYMAN, TOWN OF 230195 NEWFIELD, TOWN OF 230196 NORTH BERWICK, TOWN OF 230197 EFFECTIVE: FLOOD INSURANCE STUDY NUMBER 23005CV002A Version Number 2.3.2.1 TABLE OF CONTENTS Volume 1 Page SECTION 1.0 – INTRODUCTION 1 1.1 The National Flood Insurance Program 1 1.2 Purpose of this Flood Insurance Study Report 2 1.3 Jurisdictions Included in the Flood Insurance Study Project 2 1.4 Considerations for using this Flood Insurance Study Report 20 SECTION 2.0 – FLOODPLAIN MANAGEMENT APPLICATIONS 31 2.1 Floodplain Boundaries 31 2.2 Floodways 43 2.3 Base Flood Elevations 44 2.4 Non-Encroachment Zones 44 2.5 Coastal Flood Hazard Areas 45 2.5.1 Water Elevations and the Effects of Waves 45 2.5.2 Floodplain Boundaries and BFEs for Coastal Areas 46 2.5.3 Coastal High Hazard Areas 47 2.5.4 Limit of Moderate Wave Action 48 SECTION
    [Show full text]
  • They Planted Well: New England Planters in Maritime Canada
    They Planted Well: New England Planters in Maritime Canada. PLACES Acadia University, Wolfville, Nova Scotia, 9, 10, 12 Amherst Township, Nova Scotia, 124 Amherst, Nova Scotia, 38, 39, 304, 316 Andover, Maryland 65 Annapolis River, Nova Scotia, 22 Annapolis Township, Nova Scotia, 23, 122-123 Annapolis Valley, Nova Scotia, 10, 14-15, 107, 178 Annapolis County, Nova Scotia, 20, 24-26, 28-29, 155, 258 Annapolis Gut, Nova Scotia, 43 Annapolis Basin, Nova Scotia, 25 Annapolis-Royal (Port Royal-Annapolis), 36, 46, 103, 244, 251, 298 Atwell House, King's County, Nova Scotia, 253, 258-259 Aulac River, New Brunswick, 38 Avon River, Nova Scotia, 21, 27 Baie Verte, Fort, (Fort Lawrence) New Brunswick, 38 Barrington Township, Nova Scotia, 124, 168, 299, 315, Beaubassin, New Brunswick (Cumberland Basin), 36 Beausejour, Fort, (Fort Cumberland) New Brunswick, 17, 22, 36-37, 45, 154, 264, 277, 281 Beaver River, Nova Scotia, 197 Bedford Basin, Nova Scotia, 100 Belleisle, Annapolis County, Nova Scotia, 313 Biggs House, Gaspreau, Nova Scotia, 244-245 Blomidon, Cape, Nova Scotia, 21, 27 Boston, Massachusetts, 18, 30-31, 50, 66, 69, 76, 78, 81-82, 84, 86, 89, 99, 121, 141, 172, 176, 215, 265 Boudreau's Bank, (Starr's Point) Nova Scotia, 27 Bridgetown, Nova Scotia, 196, 316 Buckram (Ship), 48 Bucks Harbor, Maine, 174 Burton, New Brunswick, 33 Calkin House, Kings County, 250, 252, 259 Camphill (Rout), 43-45, 48, 52 Canning, Nova Scotia, 236, 240 Canso, Nova Scotia, 23 Cape Breton, Nova Scotia, 40, 114, 119, 134, 138, 140, 143-144 2 Cape Cod-Style House, 223
    [Show full text]
  • Wampanoag, Tribespeople “Of the Dawn”
    THE WAMPANOAG, TRIBESPEOPLE “OF THE DAWN” “Ye see, Hinnissy, th’ Indyun is bound f’r to give way to th’ onward march iv white civilization. You ’an me, Hinnissy, is th’ white civilization... The’ on’y hope f’r th’ Indyun is to put his house on rollers, an’ keep a team hitched to it, an’, whin he sees a white man, to start f’r th’ settin’ sun.” — Finley Peter Dunne, OBSERVATIONS BY MR. DOOLEY, New York, 1902 HDT WHAT? INDEX WAMPANOAG WAMPANOAG When the English settlements first commenced in New England, that part of its territory, which lies south of New Hampshire, was inhabited by five principal nations of Indians: the Pequots, who lived in Connecticut; the Narragansets, in Rhode Island; the Pawkunnawkuts, or Womponoags, east of the Narragansets and to the north as far as Charles river;1 the Massachusetts, north of Charles river and west of Massachusetts Bay; and the Pawtuckets, north of the Massachusetts. The boundaries and rights of these nations appear not to have been sufficiently definite to be now clearly known. They had within their jurisdiction many subordinate tribes, governed by sachems, or sagamores, subject, in some respects, to the principal sachem. At the commencement of the seventeenth century, they were able to bring into the field more than 18,000 warriors; but about the year 1612, they were visited with a pestilential disease, whose horrible ravages reduced their number to about 1800.2 Some of their villages were entirely depopulated. This great mortality was viewed by the first Pilgrims, as the accomplishment of one of the purposes of Divine Providence, by making room for the settlement of civilized man, and by preparing a peaceful asylum for the persecuted Christians of the old world.
    [Show full text]
  • 4 Year Bridge Investment Plan : Includes $160M from "An Act to Keep Bridges Safe"
    Maine State Library Digital Maine Transportation Documents Transportation 4-8-2008 4 Year Bridge Investment Plan : Includes $160M from "An Act to Keep Bridges Safe" Maine Department of Transportation Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalmaine.com/mdot_docs Recommended Citation Maine Department of Transportation, "4 Year Bridge Investment Plan : Includes $160M from "An Act to Keep Bridges Safe"" (2008). Transportation Documents. 127. https://digitalmaine.com/mdot_docs/127 This Text is brought to you for free and open access by the Transportation at Digital Maine. It has been accepted for inclusion in Transportation Documents by an authorized administrator of Digital Maine. For more information, please contact [email protected]. 4 Year Bridge Investment Plan Includes $160M from "An Act to Keep Bridges Safe" April 2008 ESTIMATED BRIDGE # TOWN/S BRIDGE NAME ROAD FEATURE UNDER COST 5657 Abbot Brown Black Road Brown Brook $300,000 3300 Acton - Newfield Balch Mills Acton Bridge Road Little Ossippee River $425,000 1271 Alfred Nutter's Back Road Littlefield River $450,000 5100 Alton Tannery Tannery Road Dead Stream $350,000 6247 Amherst West Branch Route 9 W. Branch 1/2 Mile Pond Brook $435,000 3726 Anson Ice House Route 201A Gilbert Brook $760,000 3948 Arundel Hutchins Log Cabin Road (SA 5) Goffs Mill Brook $100,000 0077 Auburn Royal River Old Danville Road Royal River $600,000 1465 Augusta I-95/New Belgrade SB I-95 SB Routes 8 - 11 & 27 $2,500,000 2719 Augusta Riggs Routes 100 & 201 Riggs Brook $2,000,000 3078 Augusta Father
    [Show full text]