DOCSLIB.ORG

Christopher Marlowe's the Jew of Malta

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Christopher Marlowe's the Jew of Malta Christopher Marlowe’s The Jew of Malta -written in 1589-1590, and first performed in 1592- It is now sometimes seen as a satire of then-contemporary attitudes of Christians towards Jews. Elizabethan England probably saw the play as a demonization of the Jewish faith. The Jew of Malta is considered to have been a major influence of William Shakespeare's The Merchant of Venice . The Jewish merchant in question, Barabas, is introduced as a man owning more wealth than the entire city of Malta. The name Barabas comes from the Biblical figure of Barabbas, a notorious bandit. Barabbas, rather than Jesus Christ, was released by Pontius Pilate at the behest of a mob. In order to raise tribute demanded by the Muslim Turks, Ferneze, the Christian governor of Malta, seizes half the property of all Jews living on Malta. When Barabas, a wealthy Jewish merchant, protests, his entire estate is confiscated. Seeking revenge on his enemies, Barabas plots their destruction. With the aid of his daughter, Abigail, he recovers some of his former assets and buys a Turkish slave, Ithamore, who appears to hate Christians as much as Barabas. Barabas then uses his daughter's beauty to embitter the governor's son and his friend against each other, leading to a duel in which they both die. When Abigail learns of Barabas's role in the plot, she consigns herself to a nunnery, only to be poisoned (along with all of the nuns) by Barabas and Ithamore. Barabas is finally dropped into a boiling cauldron by the Turks and killed. As with Shakespeare's Merchant of Venice, the unremitting evil of The Jew of Malta's protagonist leaves the play open to accusations of anti-Semitism. The play ridicules Christian monks and nuns for engaging in forbidden sexual practices, and portrays a pair of friars trying to outbid each other to bring Barabas (and his wealth) into their order. Malta's Christian governor, in addition to his unfair treatment of the city's Jews, is revealed to be a grasping opportunist who seizes any chance to get an advantage. The Jew of Malta was a success in its first performance at the Rose theatre in early 1592. It gained significant notoriety due to Marlowe's arrest for heresy and subsequent violent death in 1593, and the 1594 execution of Dr. Rodrigo Lopez, Queen Elizabeth's Jewish physician. The play remained popular for the next fifty years. Barabas. Thus trowls our fortune in by land and sea, And thus are we on every side enriched. These are the blessings promised to the Jews, And herein was old Abram's happiness. What more may heaven do for earthly man Than thus to pour out plenty in their laps, Ripping the bowels of the earth for them, Making the sea their servants, and the winds To drive their substance with successful blasts? Who hateth me but for my happiness? Or who is honored now but for his wealth? Rather had I, a Jew, be hated thus, Than pitied in a Christian poverty; For I can see no fruits in all their faith, But malice, falsehood, and excessive pride, Which methinks fits not their profession. Haply some hapless man hath conscience, And for his conscience lives in beggary. They say we are a scattered nation. I cannot tell, but we have scambled up More wealth by far than those that brag of faith. There's Kirriah Jairim, the great Jew of Greece, Obed in Bairseth, Nones in Portugal, Myself in Malta, some in Italy, Many in France, and wealthy every one, Ay, wealthier far than any Christian. I must confess we come not to be kings. That's not our fault. Alas, our number's few, And crowns come either by succession Or urged by force, and nothing violent, Oft have I heard tell, can be permanent. Give us a peaceful rule; make Christians kings, That thirst so much for principality. I have no charge, nor many children, But one sole daughter, whom I hold as dear. Shakespeare’s “Christian Comedy” The Merchant of Venice (1594-1597) By Michael J. Cummings . Was William Shakespeare anti-Semitic? ........ One school of Shakespeare interpreters answers yes, resoundingly. Their primary evidence is his depiction of the Jewish moneylender Shylock in The Merchant of Venice as grasping, vengeful, and ethnically foul. Shakespeare’s message: Jews are evil. ........ However, close scrutiny of the play reveals that Shakespeare wrote it to condemn the moral and ethical values of errant Christians, not Jews. The Christian characters in The Merchant of Venice assess their own worth and the worth of others according to faulty standards, believing that money, position, and establishmentarian affiliations are the sum of a man or a woman. It is they who force Shylock into money lending; it is they who seed his monomaniacal lust for revenge. To be sure, Shylock exhibits monstrous behavior, but it is reactive behavior. He makes his living through usury because usury is the only way he can compete in Christian Venice; he accumulates wealth because he believes it gives him security and independence in a hostile Christian world. ........ What Shakespeare thought about Jews is profoundly important to writers, teachers, actors, historians, social scientists, members of the clergy–indeed to every thinking human being– because of the extraordinary influence his literary legacy exerts on human thought and endeavor. No other writer of any age is more widely read; no other writer is more argued over and written about. The popularity of Shakespeare films in recent times further aggrandizes his reputation while instilling uneasiness in those who believe he harbored prejudices that inflame anti- Semitism. ........ To find out Shakespeare–to try pin him down on the Jewish question–critics generally scrutinize The Merchant of Venice and its characters as well as other Shakespeare works with significant racial, ethnic, or religious themes. They also peruse the Elizabethan era’s record of strong anti-Semitism. ........ A daunting task for explorers of this subject is to put aside their own biases. Not all researchers can. Consequently, they guide themselves toward the desired conclusion rather than letting the research guide them to the most logical conclusion. Lovers of Shakespeare are prone to such bias. So are fault-finders who criticize Shakespeare for the offensive dialogue in The Merchant of Venice . To be sure, there is much for these fault-finders to complain about. Throughout the play, Christians depersonalize and alienate Shylock by refusing to use his given name. Instead, they call him “the villain Jew,” “this currish Jew,” “infidel,” and “cruel devil.” To the Christians, Shylock is diabolically foul. Plot The comedy starts out with Antonio, a great merchant prince of the city of Venice who sends out his ships as far as Mexico and the Indies, seeks a loan from the Jew Shylock. He readily agrees to Shylock’s suggestion that Antonio forfeit a pound of his flesh if the three thousand ducats are not paid back within three months time. The issue between the Jewish moneylender and the Christian merchant is not simply the taking of interest. It is the usurer’s merciless exploitation of his victims. He is no mere banker, but a crafty and ruthless loan shark. Defenders of Shylock often argue that at first his offer of friendship is sincere, and that he never meant the forfeit of a pound of Antonio’s flesh as anything but “a merry jest,” until his daughter Jessica deserted him to elope with one of Antonio’s Christian friends. Shylock's Passion ........ Of course, there can be no denying Shylock’s passion for accumulating wealth. Verily, he breeds it, as rams and ewes breed lambs, he tells Antonio in Act I, Scene III. He also tells his daughter, Jessica, that he even dreams about moneybags. After Jessica raids those moneybags and her father’s store of jewels to abscond with Lorenzo, a Christian, Salanio tells his companion Salarino in Act II, Scene VIII: ................ I never heard a passion so confused, ................ So strange, outrageous, and so variable, ................ As the dog Jew did utter in the streets: ................ 'My daughter! O my ducats! O my daughter! ................ Fled with a Christian! O my Christian ducats! ................ Justice! the law! my ducats, and my daughter! ................ A sealed bag, two sealed bags of ducats, ................ Of double ducats, stolen from me by my daughter! ........ These lines appear to indict Shylock as a man so consumed by his love of money that he cares more for his ducats than he does for his daughter. However, while acknowledging Shylock’s avarice, careful Shakespeare exegetes also should note that Salarino, a Christian, is a biased reporter who prefaces his news with the slur “dog Jew.” In a court of law, his credibility would be nil. But what if he reported the exact words of Shylock? In that case, consider that the passage is framed at the beginning and end by “my daughter” and that the heart of the passage, Line 4, is also so framed. It indicates that Shylock cares about Jessica. That she would steal from him and run off with an avowed enemy wounds him deeply. ..Christian gibes also brand Shylock as Satan in godly clothing. In Act I, Scene III, after Shylock quotes the Bible to make a point, Antonio tells Bassanio: ANTONIO Mark you this, Bassanio, The devil can cite Scripture for his purpose. An evil soul producing holy witness Is like a villain with a smiling cheek, A goodly apple rotten at the heart: O, what a goodly outside falsehood hath! ANTONIO Well, Shylock, shall we be beholding to you? SHYLOCK Signior Antonio, many a time and oft In the Rialto you have rated me About my moneys and my usances: Still have I borne it with a patient shrug, For sufferance is the badge of all our tribe.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 'Otherness' in Shakespeare's Othello and the Merchant Of
    The Representation of ‘Otherness’ in Shakespeare’s Othello and The Merchant of Venice Othello and Shylock Diplomarbeit zur Erlangung des akademischen Grades einer Magistra der Philosophie an der Karl-Franzens-Universität Graz vorgelegt von Gerda TISCHLER am Institut für Anglistik Begutachter: o. Univ.-Prof. Mag. Dr. Werner Wolf Graz, 2013 Acknowledgement First and foremost, I would like to express my gratitude to my supervisor Professor Werner Wolf, who has not only offered valuable guidance, assistance, and help in the composition of this thesis, but who has also been an inspiring and very encouraging mentor throughout the rest of my studies, supporting me in many ways. Additionally, I would like to thank my former teachers Waltraud Wagner and Liselotte Schedlbauer, who stirred up my enthusiasm for both the English language and literature. I also want to express my warmest and sincere thanks to my parents, who have always encouraged me in the actualisation of my dreams and who have been incredibly supportive in any respect throughout my entire life. Besides, I want to thank Christopher for showing so much sympathy and understanding, and for making me laugh wholeheartedly at least once a day. Lastly, I am indebted to my family, friends, and anyone without whom the completion of this thesis would not have been possible. Contents 1 Introduction ............................................................................................................... 5 2 The ‘Other’ – Attempts at an Explanation ............................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 31295010297371.Pdf (3.316Mb)
    OBJECTIVE IRONY IN T^B JEW OP MALTA by JIM MAGEB COWAN, B.A. A THESIS IN ENGLISH Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of Texas Technological College in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of MASTER OF ARTS Approved August, ^9t^ /lefe-nM^ 19a ACKNOWLBDGHBNT 1 wish to thank Professor Joseph T. HoCullen for his help and encouragement during the prei>aratlon of this thesis. 11 CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGMENT ii I • BACKGROUND i Purpose Statement 1 The Artist, Irony, Subjectivity, and Objectivity 7 ^ The Objective and Subjective Frames of Reference 10 Marlowe's Use of Machiavellian Ethics to Demonstrate Objective Truth 20 II. AN ANALYSIS OF IRONY AND OBJECTIVITY IN TEE JEW OP MALTA 2k III. CONCLUSION 69 iii CHAPTER I BACKGROUND Purpose Statement Although numerous critics have denounced the subjective intrusion of Christopher Marlowe in The Jew of Malta, subjectivity is not so grievous a fault as it would appear; Marlowe's subjective approach remains just that--an approach. The actual character revelation and plot development are handled in a manner so objective as to be almost inhuman. The cold and callous intellectual scrutiny to which Marlowe subjects his Jews, Turks, and Christians is the very antithesis to subjectivity. Jews, Turks, and Christians are exposed to the same temptations; and, whereas their differing cultures and varying historic roles would indicate that their actions would be different, Marlowe shows the audience by a coldly rational and ironic dramatization that the same values and concepts are applicable to each character. Insight into this objective dramatic treatment can best be achieved through a study of irony in Marlowe's The Jew of Malta* for an understanding of irony is necessary to the understanding of the objectivity of the play.
    [Show full text]
  • Theme of Humanism Complex in Christopher Marlowe's Tragedies
    International Journal of Humanities Social Sciences and Education (IJHSSE) Volume 2, Issue 12, December 2015, PP 9-14 ISSN 2349-0373 (Print) & ISSN 2349-0381 (Online) www.arcjournals.org Theme of Humanism Complex in Christopher Marlowe’s Tragedies Yonggang Zhao School of Foreign Languages, China West Normal University, No. 1 Shi Da Road, Nanchong, 637009, Sichuan, China [email protected] The research is financed by Sichuan Foreign Language and Literature Research Center (Project No. SCWY14- 18) and Research Innovation Team of China West Normal University Named “Study on Ecological Literature Criticism” Abstract: Marlowe’s plays reflected his strong emotions of humanism. Tambelain the Great reflects people’s infinite pursuit of rights. The Tragical History of Doctor Faustus reflects the infinite pursuit of knowledge. The Jew of Malta reflects the infinite pursuit of wealth. Marlowe showed their superman spirits that they outdid themselves and were able to do everything by shaping the heroes as supermen who never gave in and always transcended the limit of humans, which reflected both Marlowe’s personal ambition and the spirit of the times that they wanted to struggle to break through all the limitations and get good things during the Renaissance. Keywords: Christopher Marlowe; Humanism Complex; Features; Influence. 1. INTRODUCTION During the Renaissance, humanism was the core idea of politics, economy and culture in society. Although people had different understandings about humanism, the core content is the same. Humanism confirms the position of human in life. It holds the idea of people oriented and replaced the Theocracy that the church advocated for human rights. It confirmed the contemporary living to knock the asceticism and afterlife thoughts down.
    [Show full text]
  • The Jew As Dangerous Other in Early Italian Cinema, 1910-1914
    The Jew as Dangerous Other in Early Italian Cinema, 1910-1914 Gerwyn Glyn Owen 2014 A thesis submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Film Studies School of Creative Studies and Media Bangor University ii Abstract My thesis examines imagery of the Jew in four Italian silent films: Il mercante di Venezia (Gerolamo Lo Savio, 1910), L’Inferno (Francesco Bertolini, Adolfo Padovan, Giuseppe de Liguoro, 1911), Quo Vadis? (Enrico Guazzoni, 1913), and Cabiria (Giovanni Pastrone, 1914). The thesis deconstructs this filmic imagery and traces its history back to medieval and Renaissance representations of the Jew. This process reveals connections between traditional anti-Jewish ideologies and the moving images of early Italian cinema. In so doing, my thesis demonstrates that there is a powerful relationship between the socio-political and religious discourses that were in circulation before the First World War in Italy and the presence of anti-Semitic stereotyping in these films. It also argues that the image of the Jew in all of these filmic case studies functions as a representation of the radical dangerous Other that threatens the unity of the citizenry of the nation- state of the Kingdom of Italy and the cohesion of Liberal Italian society at a key time of new nation- building. iii Contents Abstract ................................................................................................................................................ ii Acknowledgements .............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 92. Judaism and Jews B R E T T D
    book identifi es Easter Term as starting the eighteenth day such an overt liturgical allusion as Shakespeare provides aft er Easter and ending the Monday aft er the Ascension. in the title Twelft h Night was certainly not a reference to Trinity Term began the Friday aft er Trinity Sunday and the religious nature of the feast, or even to a performance ended June 28. Michaelmas Term began October 9 or 10 date, but to the atmosphere of frivolous chaos that had and ended November 28 or 29. Hillary Term began January developed over the years. It is far more likely that the 23 or 24 and ended February 12 or 13. During term time, timing of these performances was based on ecclesiasti- the court did not sit on Sundays or on the feasts of the cal rules regarding secular entertainment during certain Ascension, John the Baptist, All Saints, or the Purifi cation seasons of the year. Th e penitential seasons of Advent of Mary. and Lent, for example, were inappropriate for theatrical amusements. Dramatic performances S o u r c e c i t e d and the liturgical year G a r d i n e r , S a m u e l . Th e Cognizance of a True Christian, or the Dramatic performances were oft en scheduled to coin- outward markes whereby he may be the better knowne , etc. cide with certain church seasons or feasts. Th is practice London : Th omas Creede , 1597 . was not new to the English Renaissance, however. Th e medieval mystery plays serve as a prime example of the F u r t h e r r e a d i n g long-standing connection between theater, religion, and B r y a n t , J a m e s C .
    [Show full text]
  • Trial by Jewry: the Jewish Figure As Subversive Critic in the Plays of The
    I University of Birmingham Research Archive e-theses repository This unpublished thesis/dissertation is copyright of the author and/or third parties. The intellectual property rights of the author or third parties in respect of this work are as defined by The Copyright Designs and Patents Act 1988 or as modified by any successor legislation. Any use made of information contained in this thesis/dissertation must be in accordance with that legislation and must be properly acknowledged. Further distribution or reproduction in any format is prohibited without the permission of the copyright holder. "Trial By Jewry*: The Jewish Figure as Subversive Critic in the Plays of the Public Theatre, 1580-1600 by Lloyd Edward Kermode A thesis submitted to the Faculty of Arts of the University of Birmingham in partial fulfilment of the degree of Master of Philosophy The Shakespeare Institute. August 1992 SYNOPSIS This thesis sets out to analyse the role of the Jewish figure on the late Elizabethan public stage. To do this, an historical approach is used. The first chapter charts generally the movements of the Jews on the Continent in the fifteenth- and sixteenth-centuries, showing how some Jews were to find their way to England, and where those Jews lived; but also painting a picture of the Jews' situation in various key European locations, a picture from which many images found their way onto the English stage. The second chapter analyses the place of the public theatre in the suburbs around London, and surveys the English arena into which the Jews were received. Chapters three to seven follow the estimated early performances of the plays involving Jewish or 'Jew-ish 1 figures, and analyse the social, cultural, religious and political significance of the interest in a race of people officially absent from the country since 1290.
    [Show full text]
  • Book Review: <Em>Shakespeare's Marlowe:The Influence of Christopher Marlowe on Shakespeare's Artistry</Em>
    126 Book Reviews consider the construction of Hamlets in a range of discourses and narrative traditions. The book interrogates what it is to perform Hamlet, to perform gender, to perform human. In his introduction, Howard makes clear that his intention is not to develop a unified theory of female Hamlets; to do so would indeed be reduc- tive. Shakespearean scholars might ask for further exploration of what these female Hamlets have to tell us about the play’s early textual and theatrical productions; this field of enquiry is held out as something of a promise in chapter one’s references to Q1’s female characters but is not developed. Read- ers of a more theoretical turn might expect an engagement with psychoana- lytic or performance theory. Very occasionally, Howard’s determination not to theorize threatens to lead to the potentially reductive alternative of the universalizing flourish: ‘Hamlet is a consciousness facing everyone’s dilem- mas — to try to confront the status quo or withdraw from it, to work with words or violence, to blame the world’s malaise on others or face a sickness in oneself, to understand death — and these actresses add new layers of mean- ing to them all’ (311). However, he deals with the theatrical, historical, and political contexts of these ‘layers’ so rigorously that his book will surely serve the performance historian, the Shakespearean scholar, and the performance theoretician equally well. The lively but never gratuitous anecdotal moments in Howard’s histories and the sense that one is being offered access to a wealth of long-hidden Hamlets and neglected female creativity make for a consist- ently rewarding read.
    [Show full text]
  • The Merchant of Venice, by William Shakespeare
    The Merchant of Venice, by William Shakespeare In A Nutshell The Merchant of Venice is a comedy written by William Shakespeare around 1597. It tells the story of two Venetian merchants who loathe each other, Antonio and Shylock, and their business deal undertaken on behalf of Antonio's good friend, Bassanio. One of the merchants, Shylock, is a Jew living in the heavily Christian Venetian society; and religious prejudice and tension infuse the entire play. For Shakespeare, writing to an English audience about a Jewish moneylender might have seemed unusual, as Jews had been banished from England in 1290 under The Edict of Expulsion. How was Shakespeare to explain the Jewish presence to Elizabethan audiences, who had little exposure to Jewish culture and religion? Shakespeare's literary rival, Christopher Marlowe had actually just written a play called The Jew of Malta in 1589. That play’s title character was a Jew named Barabas, and as a greedy, cunning, and murderous stereotype, he fit the bill of "stock" Jewish characters that Elizabethan theatergoers of the time loved to hate. Of course, since there were no actual Jews publicly living in England, the worst kinds of stereotypes and legends about the entire group could prevail unchecked. The stories got more and more fantastic, including everything from sacrificing kidnapped Christian children on Easter to killing full-grown Christians for their blood to be used in Passover rituals. Christopher Marlowe’s play, and his inexplicably evil Jewish protagonist, sparked English thinking about the long-absent English Jews. Visit Shmoop for full coverage of The Merchant of Venice Shmoop: study guides and teaching resources for literature, US history, and poetry Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial 3.0 This document may be modified and republished for noncommercial use only.
    [Show full text]
  • Moving Marlowe: the Jew of Malta on the Caroline Stage
    Moving Marlowe: The Jew of Malta on the Caroline Stage HOPKINS, Lisa <http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9512-0926> Available from Sheffield Hallam University Research Archive (SHURA) at: http://shura.shu.ac.uk/14548/ This document is the author deposited version. You are advised to consult the publisher's version if you wish to cite from it. Published version HOPKINS, Lisa (2017). Moving Marlowe: The Jew of Malta on the Caroline Stage. Marlowe Studies. Copyright and re-use policy See http://shura.shu.ac.uk/information.html Sheffield Hallam University Research Archive http://shura.shu.ac.uk Moving Marlowe: The Jew of Malta on the Caroline Stage In spring 2016 I submitted a proposal to Globe Education to run a Research in Action workshop on staging The Jew of Malta in an indoor playhouse. This was accepted and took place on 6 June 2016 in the Sam Wanamaker Playhouse, with the help of Will Tosh from Globe Education and four actors, David Acton, Ben Deery, Robert Mountford and Aslam Percival, who had not only studied the parts of the play they had been asked to prepare but had read the whole of it and were brimful of ideas (not forgetting Robbie Hand, who very nobly played the entire Ottoman army as well as taking notes during the workshop).1 In this article, I am first going to discuss what happened at the workshop and then move on to consider what The Jew of Malta might have looked like on the Caroline stage, with specific reference to two other plays which I suggest might have impacted on its reception in the 1630s, Chettle’s Hoffman and Ford’s Love’s Sacrifice.
    [Show full text]
  • A Critique of Marlovian Heroes
    Litera: Dil, Edebiyat ve Kültür Araştırmaları Dergisi Litera: Journal of Language, Literature and Culture Studies Litera 2020; 30(2): 385-406 DOI: 10.26650/LITERA2020-0040 Research Article Teleological Trajectory of Subjection: A Critique of Marlovian Heroes Sukhdev SINGH1 ABSTRACT One might view Christopher Marlowe’s heroes such as Tamburlaine, Barabas, Edward II and Doctor Faustus in terms of individuals who capably transgress the boundaries within which they are located. War for Tamburlaine; gold for Barabas; philia, which is defined as love or friendship between an older and a young man, for Edward II; and 1Dr., National Institute of Technology the knowledge of good and evil for Doctor Faustus are those mediums by which Patna, Department of Humanities & Social they apparently subjectivise themselves. This study analyses their subjectivities by Sciences, Patna, India posing a fundamental question: do they form their individuality on their own or is ORCID: S.S. 0000-0002-4952-9541 it a matter of a paradigm of divine providence? The paradigm of divine providence might be equivalent to a structure of power. This study has recourse to what might Corresponding author: be termed the Foucauldian teleology, which is based on some of Michel Foucault’s Sukhdev SINGH, fundamental ideas. In other words, in order to present a critique of Marlovian National Institute of Technology Patna, heroes, this study has recourse to the Foucauldian teleology which involves various Department of Humanities & Social Sciences, Patna, India mechanisms of control to subjectivise ordinary people in accordance with the state E-mail: [email protected] or the structures of power.
    [Show full text]
  • Marlowe, Christopher. the Jew of Malta, Ed. Mathew R. Martin
    comptes rendus 183 Marlowe, Christopher. The Jew of Malta, ed. Mathew R. Martin. Peterborough, ON: Broadview Editions, 2012. Pp. 289. ISBN 978-1-55481-068-0 (paperback) $18.95. The Jew of Malta is one of a group of late-Elizabethan texts in which—strangely for a country in which no significant Jewish community had been permitted for fully three centuries—ideas about Jewishness, most of them anti-Semitic, are strongly foregrounded. Mathew Martin’s new edition of the play, with its wide- ranging and thoughtful introduction and four substantial appendices, provides critical guidance and a well-chosen array of primary contextual materials which readers of all kinds will find useful in making sense of a controversial play-text that also remains, in its vicious hilarity, eminently stage-worthy. Harold Bloom claimed, misleadingly I think, that The Jew of Malta pushes anti-Semitic tropes so far into farce and absurdity that they are effectively de- fanged. But contextualizing analyses of the kind this edition will encourage should permit a more nuanced understanding of the matter. In his first appendix, Martin excerpts two scenes from Robert Wilson’s Three Ladies of London (1584) in which Mercadorus, a London-based mer- chant who speaks a generically “foreign” English, seeks in Turkey to cheat the Jew Gerontus out of the large sum he owes him by converting to Islam (which by Turkish law would free him from prior debts). Rather than see even so crooked a Christian commit apostasy, the humane Gerontus forgives the debt and shows no resentment when Mercadorus gloats over having “cozened de Je w.” Marlowe’s Barabas (whose only offence, beyond an arrogant narcissism, has been the greed that motivates him to enclose “Infinite riches in a little room”) is similarly cheated by dishonest Christians, who after seizing his prop- erty in order to pay the tribute owing to the Turks, keep it even once they’ve decided to refuse the tribute.
    [Show full text]
  • Teachers' Notes
    6 – 20 march 2014 teachers’ Notes Writing the Merchant of Venice Antonio: Shakespeare and Queen Elizabeth I I hold the world but as the world, Gratiano, A stage where every man must play a part, Queen Elizabeth I (1533-1603, r. 1558-1603), the so-called And mine a sad one. ‘Virgin Queen’, had been on the throne almost 40 years. After The Merchant of Venice (1.1.77-78) the turmoil of the reign of her father Henry VIII, this ‘golden age’ was proving to be a time of considerable advancement Shakespeare: Actor, Playwright, Poet for England in both exploration and colonisation (the Americas), military power (the defeat of the Spanish Armada), The Merchant of Venice is thought to be written around 1596-7. science, literature and music. William Shakespeare was by then a leading member and chief playwright of acting troupe the Lord Chamberlain’s Men. The Shakespeare’s company enjoyed the patronage of the Queen. Lord Chamberlain’s Men and another company, the Lord He performed in two comedies before the Queen at the Royal Admiral’s Men, performed regularly at court during festive Palace, Greenwich, in December 1594; Love’s Labour’s Lost occasions. The Lord Chamberlain’s Men also performed at was performed for her on December 26, 1597. The Theatre in Shoreditch, built by James Burbage in 1576). It was with this company that Shakespeare was a shareholder It is no surprise that Shakespeare chose to have strong, and would later become a ‘house’ holder in the Globe central female characters in The Merchant of Venice, As You Theatre, built in Southwark in 1599 from the timbers of the Like It and Much Ado About Nothing.
    [Show full text]