Phylogeny of Poaceae Inferred from Matk Sequences Khidir W. Hilu; Lawrence A. Alice; Hongping Liang Annals of the Missouri Botan
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Phylogeny of Poaceae Inferred from matK Sequences Khidir W. Hilu; Lawrence A. Alice; Hongping Liang Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden, Vol. 86, No. 4. (Autumn, 1999), pp. 835-851. Stable URL: http://links.jstor.org/sici?sici=0026-6493%28199923%2986%3A4%3C835%3APOPIFM%3E2.0.CO%3B2-D Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden is currently published by Missouri Botanical Garden Press. Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of JSTOR's Terms and Conditions of Use, available at http://www.jstor.org/about/terms.html. JSTOR's Terms and Conditions of Use provides, in part, that unless you have obtained prior permission, you may not download an entire issue of a journal or multiple copies of articles, and you may use content in the JSTOR archive only for your personal, non-commercial use. Please contact the publisher regarding any further use of this work. Publisher contact information may be obtained at http://www.jstor.org/journals/mobot.html. Each copy of any part of a JSTOR transmission must contain the same copyright notice that appears on the screen or printed page of such transmission. The JSTOR Archive is a trusted digital repository providing for long-term preservation and access to leading academic journals and scholarly literature from around the world. The Archive is supported by libraries, scholarly societies, publishers, and foundations. It is an initiative of JSTOR, a not-for-profit organization with a mission to help the scholarly community take advantage of advances in technology. For more information regarding JSTOR, please contact [email protected]. http://www.jstor.org Mon Jul 23 11:25:41 2007 PHYLOGENY OF POACEAE Khidir K Hilu2, Lazcrence A. Ali~e~.~, INFERRED FROM matK and Hongping Liang' SEQUENCES1 Complete sequences of the plastic1 gene mcrtK \+-eredetermined for 62 species of Poaceae from 60 genera. 26 tribes. and nine iul~fanliliesto infer phylogenetic relatiollsllips. Rrsfio tetr-upli~llus(Restionaceae) ant1 .loinl illea ascendens (Joi~l\illeacrae)were used as outgroups. Clatlistic. analysis using PAUP )ieltletl 39 most parsimo~lioustrees \+-it11several well-supl~orteclmajor lineages. Tlle strict conse~lsusLree she\+-s S~reptocl~cre~aand 4~iomochlocrforming the two most basal lineages in grasses. follo~+-ecl11) I'licrl-us 11eing sister to the remaining species. The other grasses divide into three clades: (1) sul~fanlil) Banll~~~soitleae(exclucli~lgRrcrchje!,~r7c~ii) plus Pooideae: (2) Oryzoicleae: and (3) s~ll~fanlilies Panicoideae. Ar~lntli~loitleae.Cento~hecoideae. ancl Chloridoideae (termed PACC). EacepL for A~~~~~~clinoicleae.monopllyly of each P.1CC subfamily is generally well supported; ho~\e\enrelationships among subfamilies are unresolved or weakly supportetl. Results ol~tai~leclusing 117crtK sequences are largely consistent wit11 other phylogenies l~aseclon molecular ancl s~ructuraldata. particularly in that relationsllips among subfamilies remain ~~nclear. Interest in the evolutio~lof grasses began early standing of grass evolution at the subfamilial level in this century with proposed hypotheses based on ancl, to a certain degree, at the tribal level, major assessment of existing knowledge of the family questions remain to be resolved. Although the basal (e.g., Bew, 1929: H~lhbarcl,1948; Stebbins, 1956, positions of Anornochloeae, Phareae, and Strepto- 1982; Prat, 1960; Clayton, 1981; Tsvelev, 1983). chaeteae have been established, their relative Eln~iricalapproaches to phylogenetic reconstruc- placement ancl taxonomic status are debatable. Un- tion of the Poaceae followed those initial hypothe- certainties also concerning the phylogenetic ses, starting with cladistic analyses of morphologi- affinities alnong sullfamilies the taxonomic cal ancl anatomical characters (Baum, 1987; rank of others such as the ~ ~ ~ ~ i ~ l ~ ~ ~ . Kellogg Campbe11, 1987; Kellogg S- Watson, In this study, the chloroplast mcltK gene was cho- 1993). lnolecular data have provided the sen to acldress these and other questions pertaining grounds for phylogenetic in grasses at to higher-level grass systematics, The nliLtK gene is the subfamilial ancl tribal levels. These studies -1515 base pairs (hp) in most angiosperms, locat- were based on information from chloroplast DN.4 ecl within the trnK intron, and functionally may be (cpDNA) restriction sites and DNA sequencing of involved in splicing group I1 introns (Neuhaus S- the rbcL, ndhF, rps4, rpoC2, mi~tK,nuclear riho- Link, 1987; Ems et al., 1995; Hilu & -Alice, in soma1 DNA (nrDNA) 18s and 26S, phytochrome, press a). The effective application of this gene in ancl granule-bound starch synthase genes, as well as the noncocling n r ~~~~~~~l~ ~ ~~ ~ plant~ systematics~ ~ ~(e.g., iJohnsonb S-~ Soltis,d 1994, spacer(ITS) region ( ~ 8. zimrner,~ 1988;~ D~~-b 1995:~ Hilu S- Liang, 1997: Kron, 1997) and grasses bley et al,, 1990; Davis & Soreng, 1993; CLlmmings (Liang S- Hilu, 1996: Hilu & in Press a, 11) et al., 1994; ~~i~~ et al., 1994; ~ ~et al,,~ 1994;l has~ alreadyt been documented. mi~tKis known to ~~~k~~et al,, 1995, 1999; clark et al,, 1995; D~-have relatively high rates of substitution compared & Morton, 1996; Liang 8. Hilu, 1996; Mathews to other chloroplast genes (see Olmstead & Palmer, & Sharrock, 1996; Mason-Gamer et al., 1998; So- 1994; Johnson & Soltis, 1995). This gene exhibits reng S- Davis, 1998; Hsiao et al., 1999). a relatively high proportion of transversions, and -Although these studies have refined our under- the 3' region of its open reading fiarne (ORF) has I W-e hank Nigel Barker. Lynn Clark. Travis Columbus. Jerr! Davis. Tarciso Filgueiras. Gal? Fleming, Surrey Jac.ol)s. Davicl Kneppet A. Nishiwaki. John Randall, Thomas W'iebolclt, the Botallical Garden at Bo~ill.ant1 the hlissouri Botanical Garden for supplying DNA or plant samples. Seecl material for some accessions was kindl) provided 11) the U.S. Department of Agriculture, Agriculture Research Service-National Plant Ger~nplasmSystem. Re also tllank Ger- asimo Borneo. Thomas Borsch. Gemit Davidse. John MacDougal. and Christoph Neinliuis for their assista11c.e. This work was supported 11y NSF grant #DEB-9634231 and Sigma Xi. Department of Biology. Virginia Pol!techllic Instilule and State Uni\ersit). Blacksburg. Virginia 24061-0406, U.S.A. 'Current address: Department of Biolog). A'estern Kentuck) U~liversit).Bo~\li~igGreen. Kentucky 42101, U.S.A. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden MGL S5-1% --+W 7% trnK 5' matK trnK 3' + + + 1210R 9R MG15 Figure 1. Diagram of he trrzK region including the rnntK gene. PCR ancl sequellcitlg primers are inclicatecl ~vith arrons. Primer sequences are: MG1 = CTACTGC.AGAACTAGTCGGATGGA.\GTT4GC4T:hZG1S = ATCTGGGTTGCTA- ACTCAATG: 55-1F = ACCCTGTTCTGACCATATTG: 1210R = GTAGTTGAGAAIGAATCGC: K = TACCCTATCC- TATCCAT: 7R = GATTTATCAIGGATTGGGAT: a~lcl9R = TACGAGCTAAAGTTCTAGC. trnK evons ant1 primers are nol dra~vnto scale. been deinonstratecl to he quite useful in resolving- ples were electrophoresed in an ABI 373L4 aauto- subfamilial, ancl to a certain degree, tribal relation- mated DN.4 sequencer with a stretch gel or in an ships in Poaceae (Liang & Hilu, 1996). ABI 310 Genetic Analyzer (Applied Biosystems, Inc., Foster City, California). Resulting chromato- grams were manually edited using Sequence Nav- igator 1.0 software (-AppliedBiosystems Inc., Foster PLANT SAhIPLES City, California). Sequences were deposited in We sequenced the entire matK gene of 62 Po- GenBank (see Appendix 1). aceae species representing 60 genera, 26 tribes, and nine subfamilies (Appendix.. 1).Suhfamilial and SEQUENCE ALIGNMENT AND PHI-LOGENETIC .ANALYSIS tribal classification generally follows Clayton ancl Alignment of complete matK sequences was un- Renvoize (1986). Restio tetraphyllus (Restionaceae) ambiguous ancl, thus, done manually. Twelve gaps ancl Joznvilleu ascendens (Joinvilleaceae) were used varying in length from 1 to 9 hp were required to as outgroups because recent studies have clemon- align sequences (Table 1). Non-random structure in stratecl that these two families are closely related the data was tested by using the random trees op- to grasses (Doyle et al., 1992; Kellogg 8. Lincler, tion in PL4UP*4.0b2a(Swofforcl, 1998). The g,val- 1995; Soreng & Davis, 1998, and references there- ue for the distribution of tree lengths of 100,000 in). random trees was coinpared using the critical value (at a = 0.05) for 500 variable characters ancl 25 DNA ISOL.kT1ON. POLYMERASE CH.AIN REACTION (PCR) taxa. Beyond 15 taxa, g,critical values change only A?lPLIFIC.kTION. AND SEQUENCING slightly, allowing them to be used in a conservative Leaf tissue was harvested from either green- test with more taxa (Hillis & Huelsenheck, 1992). house-grown plants, field-collected plants, or her- Phylogenies were generated using Fitch parsi- barium specimens. Total cellular DNA was isolated mony as implemented in PAUP, employing heuris- follo~vingM'Ribu and Hilu (1996). Because the tic searches consisting of 1000 replicates of random nmtK gene is part of the trnK intron, we used two stepwise addition of taxa with MULPL4RSon and primers (MG1 or tmK3914 and MG15), located in tree-bisection-reconnection (TBR) branch swap- the trnK 5' and 3' exons, respectively, for PCR ping. Gaps were treated as missing data. Sets of amplification. For sequencing, trnK region PCR equally parsimonious trees were summarized by products were electrophoresed in 0.8% agarose gels strict consensus. Parsimony-informative gaps are and DN.4 fragments of appropriate size excised and mapped onto the strict consensus cladogram