DOCSLIB.ORG

DUKES & DUCHESSES Recruitment

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

DUKES & DUCHESSES Recruitment 2019 Test Study Guide & History Manual As of January 1, 2019 A note about the test: The D&D test is intended to assess your familiarity of Duke University, its history, and current events around the world, as we desire candidates that can speak knowledgeably with University leaders and campus guests. The test consists of two parts: Part I covers Duke administration. These questions ensure a capable grasp of the names and titles of the leadership of our University. Part II focuses on the history of Duke as outlined in this guide. These questions are factual and require an extensive knowledge of the information, including but not limited to important historical events, information about past presidents, and developments in facilities. Part III is on current events, both here at Duke and outside of our community. This section is crucial to the ability of a D&D to engage in intelligent, meaningful conversation with guests on campus who enjoy chatting with undergraduates about the events in the world. Questions in this section pertaining to Duke ​ ​ are liable to stretch to the early 2000s, while general questions not pertaining to Duke will be more recent, in the past year or so. Much of the information in this section about Duke can be found in this guide, although we advise that you read The Chronicle and study general events through external sources. Part IV contains questions about Duke data and facts, all of which can be found in this packet. Having a firm understanding of the statistics supporting our university further smooths interactions at events, and ensures that applicants have taken time to browse this guide. All of us in D&D recognize that this is an intimidating amount of information, which is why we release the study guide early to give applicants plenty of time to prepare. Performing well on the history exam ensures not only that each member of our group can speak knowledgeably about Duke, but also that we all show commitment to this organization by preparing diligently. Please direct any questions to Tim Skapek at [email protected]. ​ ​ Good luck! Recruitment Timeline: Info Session w/ President Price – Wednesday, January 30th in White Lecture Hall 107 at 6:30 PM ​ Written application due – Sunday, February 17th found here ​ ​ Duke history test – Tuesday, February 19th in White Lecture Hall 107 at 7:30 PM ​ First round interviews – Tuesday/Wednesday, February 26th-27th ​ Second round interviews – Tuesday, March 5th ​ Final decisions released – By end of week of March 4th ​ UNIVERSITY ADMINISTRATION AND LEADERSHIP Vincent E. Price President Tallman Trask III Executive Vice President Sally Kornbluth Provost A. Eugene Washington Chancellor for Health Affairs, Duke University President and CEO, Duke University Hospital System Richard Riddell Senior Vice President and Secretary to the Board of Trustees Pamela J. Bernard Vice President and General Counsel Kyle Cavanaugh Vice President for Administration Tracey Futhey Vice President for Information Technology and Chief Information Officer Larry Moneta Vice President for Student Affairs John J. Noonan Vice President for Facilities Benjamin Reese Vice President for Office for Institutional Equity Michael J. Schoenfeld Vice President for Public Affairs and Government Relations David L. Kennedy Vice President for Alumni Affairs and Development Tim Walsh Vice President for Finance and Treasurer Kevin M. White Vice President and Director of Athletics Stelfanie Williams Vice President for Durham Affairs Kerry Abrams Dean of School of Law Valerie Ashby Dean of Trinity College of Arts and Sciences Ravi Bellamkonda Dean of Pratt School of Engineering William Boulding Dean of Fuqua School of Business Marion Broome Dean of School of Nursing L. Gregory Jones Dean of Divinity School Judith Kelley Dean of Sanford School of Public Policy Mary E. Klotman Dean of School of Medicine Paula McClain Dean of Graduate School Toddy Steelman Dean of Nicholas School of the Environment Jack Bovender Chair of the Board of Trustees Luke Powery Dean of Chapel Christoph Guttentag Dean of Undergraduate Admissions Gary Bennett Vice Provost for Undergraduate Education IMPORTANT EVENTS 1838 Brown’s Schoolhouse opens in Randolph County, NC; start of Duke’s institutional history 1839 Brown’s Schoolhouse is renamed Union Institute 1852 Union Institute renamed Normal College and chartered for training of teachers 1856 Normal College becomes affiliated with the Methodist Church 1859 Normal College renamed to Trinity College, motto Eruditio et Religio adopted ​ ​ 1878 The first women, the Giles sisters (Mary, Persis and Theresa) graduated from Trinity College 1880 The first foreign student, Charlie Soong of China, Patriarch of the Soong Dynasty, is accepted 1885 The Giles sisters become the first women to receive Masters degrees from Trinity 1887 Yale blue is adopted as the school color in honor of new President John F. Crowell’s alma mater 1892 Trinity College moves to Durham with the aid of Washington Duke and Julian Carr; the new site was Blackwell Park, a former racetrack; this is now East Campus. 1903 The Bassett Affair occurs. Prof. John Spencer Bassett fights for academic freedom. President Theodore Roosevelt later praises Trinity College for its stance on this issue. 1923 “Blue Devils” is unofficially adopted as nickname of Duke athletic programs. Named in honor of the Chasseurs Alpins (“les diables bleus”), a French military unit which had ​ ​ particularly impressed Duke students and alumni during WWI. 1924 James B. Duke organizes the Duke Endowment with $40 million; on December 29, Trinity College becomes the nucleus of Duke University 1925 – East Campus is rebuilt with the addition of eleven Georgian style buildings designed by 1927 the Horace Trumbauer architectural firm in Philadelphia 1927 – West Campus is also constructed with Neo-Gothic architecture by the Horace Trumbauer 1932 firm. The chief designer of the two campuses is African-American architect, Julian F. Abele. The buildings are built with stones from a quarry in nearby Hillsborough, NC 1930 Duke University Woman’s College is established. East Campus serves as the Woman’s College. 1939 Sarah P. Duke Gardens are dedicated 1968 Approximately 1,500 students and faculty participate in a silent vigil in front of the chapel. The protest began as a reaction to the assassination of Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. and grew to focus on minority issues on the campus as well as employee rights. 1969 Takeover of the Allen Building by group of African-American students. One of many demands is the inauguration of a Black Studies curriculum. 1972 Merger of the Women’s College and Trinity College into Trinity College of Arts and Sciences. Women are permitted to live on West Campus and men on East. 1982 Joseph M. and Kathleen Price Bryan Center opens 1983 Fuqua School of Business and Mary Lou Williams Center for Black Culture dedicated. Women’s Studies Program begins. 1991 Men’s basketball team wins first NCAA title. School of the Environment opens, incorporating the old School of Forestry and Environmental Studies and the Marine Lab. 1992 Men’s basketball team wins second NCAA title. Perkins Library marks arrival of 4 millionth volume. 1993 Nannerl O. Keohane chosen to succeed H. Keith H. Brodie as Duke’s President, first woman to hold the office of Duke University President. 1994 Opening of the Terry Sanford Institute of Public Policy and the Leon Levine Science Research Center. 1995 The School of the Environment is renamed the Nicholas School of the Environment following a $20 million gift by Peter M. Nicholas, Trinity ’64 1997 Opening of the newly renovated Memorial Gym, renamed the Brodie Recreation Center after H. Keith H. and Brenda Brodie. 1999 Duke celebrates its 75th Anniversary. The Jewish Life Center, Wilson Recreation Center and Sheffield Tennis Facility are dedicated. Card Gym receives a facelift. Women’s golf team wins first NCAA title. 2000 The Schwartz-Butters Athletic Building is completed. The University Trustees approve the construction of a new dorm, the West-Edens Link, to be completed in the Summer of 2002. 2001 Opening of the Doris Duke Center in the Sarah P. Duke Gardens. Men's basketball team wins third NCAA title. 2002 Ambler Outdoor Tennis Stadium inaugurated. The 350 bed West-Edens Link, completed for 2002-2003 academic year, includes seminar rooms, lounges, a convenience store, and two dining facilities: Rick's Diner and the Blue Devil Beanery. Yoh Football Center completed and dedicated. Women’s golf team wins second NCAA title. 2004 Under President Nannerl Keohane, the Campaign for Duke ends. After seven years, the Campaign raises $2,361,205,387. Richard H. Brodhead chosen to succeed Nannerl Keohane as Duke's President. The WEL quadrangle is renamed Keohane Quad. CIEMAS opens its doors. The Hart House is renovated and becomes the official residence of the university president beginning with Brodhead. 2005 Nasher Museum of Art opens in October to replace the Duke University Museum of Art (DUMA) that closed in May 2004. Bostock Library and the von der Heyden Pavilion also open in October. Women’s golf team wins third NCAA title. 2006 Women’s golf team wins fourth NCAA title. Duke Lacrosse case makes national headlines and will result in the three charged players declared innocent during the following year. 2007 The French Family Science Center opens. DukeEngage begins with initial grants totaling $30 million. The goal of the initiative is to sponsor student civic engagement and service learning activities. Women’s golf team wins fifth NCAA title. 2008 Duke introduces a new program beginning in the 2008-09 school year that eliminates parental contributions for families who makes less than $60,000 a year, while students from families who make less than $40,000 a year will graduate debt free. 2009 Women’s tennis team wins first NCAA title.
Recommended publications
  • Duke University Hdt What? Index

    Duke University Hdt What? Index

    DUKE UNIVERSITY HDT WHAT? INDEX DUKE UNIVERSITY DUKE UNIVERSITY 1838 James Thomas Fields was hired by the Boston bookselling firm of William D. Ticknor, which would become Ticknor, Reed & Fields in 1854 and Fields, Osgood & Company in 1868. 1832-1834 Allen & Ticknor 1834-1843 William D. Ticknor 1843-1849 William D. Ticknor & Co. 1849-1854 Ticknor, Reed & Fields 1854-1868 Ticknor and Fields 1868-1871 Fields, Osgood & Co. 1871-1878 James R. Osgood & Co. 1878-1880 Houghton, Osgood, & Co. 1880-1908 Houghton, Mifflin, & Co. 1908-2007 Houghton Mifflin Company 2007-???? Houghton Mifflin Harcourt In Boston, Isaac Knapp printed AMERICAN ANTI-SLAVERY ALMANAC FOR 1838 edited by Nathaniel Southard. He also printed the Reverend Thomas Treadwell Stone’s THE MARTYR OF FREEDOM: A DISCOURSE DELIVERED AT EAST MACHIAS, NOVEMBER 30, AND AT MACHIAS, DECEMBER 7, 1837, John Gabriel Stedman’s NARRATIVE OF JOANNA; AN EMANCIPATED SLAVE, OF SURINAM, Elizabeth Heyrick’s IMMEDIATE, NOT GRADUAL ABOLITION: OR, AN INQUIRY INTO THE SHORTEST, SAFEST, AND MOST EFFECTUAL MEANS OF GETTING RID OF WEST INDIAN SLAVERY, Friend Sarah Moore Grimké’s LETTERS ON THE EQUALITY OF THE SEXES, AND THE CONDITION OF WOMAN: ADDRESSED TO MARY S. PARKER, PRESIDENT OF THE BOSTON FEMALE ANTI-SLAVERY SOCIETY, James Williams’s NARRATIVE OF JAMES WILLIAMS, AN AMERICAN SLAVE, WHO WAS FOR SEVERAL YEARS A DRIVER ON A COTTON PLANTATION IN ALABAMA, and a 3d edition of Phillis Wheatley’s MEMOIR AND POEMS OF PHILLIS WHEATLEY, A NATIVE AFRICAN AND A SLAVE, along with poems published in 1829 and 1837 by the still-enslaved George Moses Horton of North Carolina.
  • Vol. 23, No. 8 August 2019 You Can’T Buy It

    Vol. 23, No. 8 August 2019 You Can’T Buy It

    ABSOLUTELY FREE Vol. 23, No. 8 August 2019 You Can’t Buy It As Above, So Below Artwork is by Diane Nations and is part of her exhibit Under the Influence of Jung on view at Artworks Gallery in Winston-Salem, North Carolina through August 31, 2019. See the article on Page 28. ARTICLE INDEX Advertising Directory This index has active links, just click on the Page number and it will take you to that page. Listed in order in which they appear in the paper. Page 1 - Cover - Artworks Gallery (Winston-Salem) - Diane Nations Page 3 - Ella Walton Richardson Fine Art Page 2 - Article Index, Advertising Directory, Contact Info, Links to blogs, and Carolina Arts site Page 5 - Wells Gallery at the Sanctuary & Halsey MCallum Studio Page 4 - Redux Contemporary Art Center & Charleston Artist Guild Page 6 - Thomas Dixon for Mayor & Jesse Williams District 6 Page 5 - Charleston Museum & Robert Lange Studios Page 7 - Emerge SC, Helena Fox Fine Art, Corrigan Gallery, Halsey-McCallum Studio, Page 6 - Robert Lange Studios cont., Ella Walton Richardson Fine Art & Rhett Thurman, Anglin Smith Fine Art, Halsey Institute of Contemporary Art, Lowcountry Artists Gallery The Wells Gallery at the Sanctuary & Saul Alexander Foundation Gallery Page 9 - Lowcountry Artists Gallery cont. & Halsey Institute / College of Charleston Page 8 - Halsey Institute / College of Charleston Page 10 - Halsey Institute / College of Charleston & Art League of Hilton Head Page 9 - Whimsy Joy Page 11 - Art League of Hilton Head cont. & Society of Bluffton Artists Page 10 - Halsey Institute
  • Pr-Sum-11.Pdf

    Pr-Sum-11.Pdf

    Exam Memo, Professional Responsibility Professor Griffin, Summer 2011 I awarded grades according to the law school’s grading curve, which requires a class average between 2.9 and 3.1. The average for this class was 3.10. The curve was as follows, based on a total possible 100 points. The number in parentheses indicates the number of students who received that letter grade. 93 A (2) 86-88 A- (4) 80-85 B+ (19) 70-79 B (36) 65-68 B- (6) 60-63 C+ (3) You are welcome to pick up your exams and answers at the front desk of the Health Law & Policy Institute. You will need to know your exam number in order to get the exam. You must sign out your exam and you do not need to return it. Please read over this memo and your exam before asking me any questions about your grade. For Question I, it was important to read the question and both 1) identify what Norris should do now and 2) assess Keany and Peppers. If you just skipped Norris you missed a lot of points. A key part of your analysis of Norris should have involved the Bevill test, CB 517, 522, applied in the Grand Jury Subpoena case (Roe and Moe), CB 513. This was Norris’ chance to try to get back the documents that had been turned over to the S.E.C. Whenever you learn a multi-factor test, however, you must apply it to the facts in the question. The immigration and F.T.C.
  • XIII. Supplemental Information (PDF)

    XIII. Supplemental Information (PDF)

    Annual Budget Process The City of Durham’s annual budget process is the framework for communicating major financial operational objectives and for allocating resources to achieve them. This process is a complex undertaking involving the whole government. The process begins in October and runs until the end of June. By state law, the City must adopt an annual budget ordinance by June 30 of each year. Coordination of the process is essential to the building of the budget. To achieve coordination, a calendar of activities is summarized on this page. Once the budget is approved, the focus of the budget becomes control. Ongoing monitoring of expenditures and revenues throughout the year is a responsibility shared by department heads and the Budget Department. The Accounting Services Division ensures that changes are correctly entered and payments are appropriate. The Budget and Management Services Department reviews all requests from departments to make sure that sufficient appropriations have been budgeted. All funds are reviewed on a regular basis, and a budget report is submitted to the City Council on a quarterly basis. The City Manager has the authority to transfer budgeted amounts between departments within any function. However, transfers between functions, additions or deletions require a budget amendment. To amend the budget, a revised budget ordinance must be approved by the City Council. January February March Department budgets submitted Coffees with Council continue. Budget kick-off. City Manager to Budget office. explains financial and City Council retreat to discuss City Council retreat to discuss operational objectives. vision and service issues. financial issues. Public input on budget sought Budget office projects revenues.
  • View Landscape Guidelines

    View Landscape Guidelines

    UNIVERSITY Duke LANDSCAPE CHARACTER AND DESIGN GUIDELINES MAY 2014 1 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION 4 GUIDING PRINCIPLES FOR THE DUKE CAMPUS LANDSCAPE 5 DESIGN CHARACTER 26 MATERIAL COLOR RANGE 27 LANDSCAPE TYPOLOGIES HISTORIC LANDSCAPES 9 West Quad 10 East Quad 11 NATURALISTIC LANDSCAPES 13 Reforestation and Managed Woodlands 14 Ponds, Streams, Wetlands and Raingardens 15 Parkland 16 PUBLIC LANDSCAPES 17 Plazas 18 Gardens 19 Courtyards and Terraces 20 Pedestrianways 21 CAMPUS FABRIC 23 Streetscapes 24 Interstitial Spaces 25 DESIGN ELEMENTS 27 Paving Bluestone 28 Concrete Pavers 30 Exposed Aggregate Concrete 31 Brick Pavers 32 Miscellaneous 33 Sitewalls Duke Stone 34 Duke Blend Brick 38 Other Masonry 39 Concrete 40 Miscellaneous 41 Steps and Railings Steps 42 Railings 43 Accessibility 45 Fences and Gates 46 Site Furniture Seating 47 Bike Racks 48 Bollards 48 Exterior Lighting 49 Waste and Recycling Receptacles 49 3 Duke’s campus is relatively large and spread out compared to many other universities. The main part of campus - aside from the Duke Forest and other properties - is nearly 2000 acres, with approximately 500 acres of that being actively maintained. The large amount of tree coverage, road network, topography, and natural drainage system, along with extensive designed landscapes, athletic fi elds and gardens, makes the campus an incredibly rich and complex place. These guidelines are intended to be a resource for creating and maintaining a campus landscape with a certain level of consistency that exists across various precincts with specifi c contextual requirements. These guidelines will help to set the character for the different landscape types while also providing detailed recommendations and precedents for what has and has not worked on campus previously.
  • Scientific Evidence and Prosecutorial Misconduct in the Duke Lacrosse Rape Case Paul Giannelli* the Need for Pretrial Discovery in Criminal Cases Is Critical

    Scientific Evidence and Prosecutorial Misconduct in the Duke Lacrosse Rape Case Paul Giannelli* the Need for Pretrial Discovery in Criminal Cases Is Critical

    Case Western Reserve University School of Law Scholarly Commons Faculty Publications 2009 Scientific videnceE and Prosecutorial Misconduct in the Duke Lacrosse Rape Case Paul C. Giannelli Case Western University School of Law, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarlycommons.law.case.edu/faculty_publications Part of the Evidence Commons, and the Litigation Commons Repository Citation Giannelli, Paul C., "Scientific videnceE and Prosecutorial Misconduct in the Duke Lacrosse Rape Case" (2009). Faculty Publications. 95. https://scholarlycommons.law.case.edu/faculty_publications/95 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by Case Western Reserve University School of Law Scholarly Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Faculty Publications by an authorized administrator of Case Western Reserve University School of Law Scholarly Commons. Forensic Science: Scientific Evidence and Prosecutorial Misconduct in the Duke Lacrosse Rape Case Paul Giannelli* The need for pretrial discovery in criminal cases is critical. 1 An advisory note to the federal discovery rule states: "[l]t is difficult to test expert testimony at trial without advance notice and preparation." 2 A defendant's right to confrontation, effective assistance of counsel, and due process often turns on pretrial disclosure. This essay discusses a case that demonstrates this point. What came to be known as the "Duke Lacrosse Case" began with a student party and a false accusation of rape. 3 On March 14, 2006, Crystal Mangum claimed that she had been sexually assaulted at the party. As is common in rape cases, a Sexual Assault Nurse Examiner (SANE) used what is known as a "rape kit" to collect evidence.
  • Fortis SE-S2642ACD.MAG

    Fortis SE-S2642ACD.MAG

    STATE OF NORTH CAROL OF THE WAKE COUNTY CAROLINA STATE BA Plaintiff, AMENDED FINDINGS OF FACT, v. CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND ORDER OF DISCIPLINE MICHAEL B. NIFONG, Attorney, Defendant. The Hearing Committee on its own motion pursuant to Rule of Civil Procedure 60(a) enters the following Amended Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law and Order of Discipline in order to correct a factual mistake in Findings of Fact Paragraph 43 of its original Order in this cause, and to add an additional Conclusion of Law (b): A hearing in this matter was conducted on June 12 through June 16, 2007, before a Hearing Committee composed of F. Lane Williamson, Chair, and members Sharon B. Alexander and R. Mitchel Tyler. Plaintiff, the North Carolina State Bar, was represented by Katherine E. Jean, Douglas J. Brocker, and Carmen K. Hoyme. Defendant, Michael 3. Nifong, was represented by attorneys David B. Freedman and Dudley A. Witt. Based upon the admissions contained in the pleadings and upon the evidence presented at the hearing, this Hearing Committee makes, by clear, cogent and convincing evidence, the following FINDINGS OF FACT 1. Plaintiff, the North Carolina State Bar, is a body duly organized under the laws of North Carolina and is the proper party to bring this proceeding under the authority granted it in Chapter 84 of the General Statutes of North Carolina, and the Rules and Regulations of the North Carolina State Bar (Chapter 1 of Title 27 of the North Carolina Administrative Code). 2. Defendant, Michael B. Nifong, (hereinafter "Nifong"), was admitted to the North Carolina State Bar on August 19, 1978, and is, and was at all times referred to herein, an attorney at law licensed to practice in North Carolina, subject to the laws of the State of North Carolina, the Rules and Regulations of the North Carolina State Bar and the Revised Rules of Professional Conduct.
  • Duke University Commencement ~ 2013

    Duke University Commencement ~ 2013

    Sunday, the Twelfth of May, Two Thousand and Thirteen ten o’clock in the morning ~ wallace wade stadium Duke University Commencement ~ 2013 One Hundred Sixty-First Commencement Notes on Academic Dress Academic dress had its origin in the Middle Ages. When the European universities were taking form in the thirteenth and fourteenth centuries, scholars were also clerics, and they adopted Mace and Chain of Office robes similar to those of their monastic orders. Caps were a necessity in drafty buildings, and copes or capes with hoods attached were Again at commencement, ceremonial use is needed for warmth. As the control of universities made of two important insignia given to Duke gradually passed from the church, academic University in memory of Benjamin N. Duke. costume began to take on brighter hues and to Both the mace and chain of office are the gifts employ varied patterns in cut and color of gown of anonymous donors and of the Mary Duke and type of headdress. Biddle Foundation. They were designed and executed by Professor Kurt J. Matzdorf of New The use of academic costume in the United Paltz, New York, and were dedicated and first States has been continuous since Colonial times, used at the inaugural ceremonies of President but a clear protocol did not emerge until an Sanford in 1970. intercollegiate commission in 1893 recommended a uniform code. In this country, the design of a The Mace, the symbol of authority of the gown varies with the degree held. The bachelor’s University, is made of sterling silver throughout. It is thirty-seven inches long and weighs about gown is relatively simple with long pointed Significance of Colors sleeves as its distinguishing mark.
  • Hospital, Seven Others, in Wrongful Death Suit Gillis Among Finalists For

    Hospital, Seven Others, in Wrongful Death Suit Gillis Among Finalists For

    ""• ' • •••••••I III Ill •____-_—! • • ll-l III I •—— • I—. I ••••_•! I I I _-_^_W»«-_-_-»-_-_-_i II W-l—llllll • — •• I I! •'•«" • • 111--— l| | THE CHRONICLE FRIDAY, SEPTEMBER 15,1989 DUKE UNIVERSITY DURHAM, NORTH CAROLINA CIRCULATION: 15,000 VOL. 85, NO. 16 Hospital, seven others, Recycling program begins next month By DAVID MCINTOSH cycles will attempt to coordinate raro said. in wrongful death suit A newly formed student recy­ recycling efforts and fulfill the Ferraro said the University cling organization will collect University's responsibilities as a produces over 30 tons of solid recyclable materials in four aca­ part of the Durham community. waste a day, 60 percent of which demic and administrative build­ "As Durham residents, Duke comes from the Medical Center. By MIKE GRABLE thards' children, Evelyn ings this October in a pilot students have the responsibility Duke Recycles estimates that A Davidson County man is Stewart Coulthard, 4, and program aimed at easing Dur­ to help out in the problem," Fer­ See RECYCLE on page 6 • suing the University and Robert Adams Coulthard, 2. ham's and the University's solid eight other defendants for the The University is charged waste problems. alleged wrongful death of his with failure to correctly diag­ Dormitories are not included daughter, who died of arsenic nose Sandra Coulthard's in the program run by the group poisoning in Duke Hospital on medical condition after her Duke Recycles, because greater Gillis among finalists July 9,1988. transfer from High Point Re­ concentrations of recyclable ma­ The suit was filed Monday gional Hospital on June 28, terial is found in other buildings.
  • Duke University and the Methodist Tradition1

    Duke University and the Methodist Tradition1

    ,... ____________________________mm ___ _,, ____ _ ' ' Methodist History, 42:3 (April 2004) I' '· DUKE UNIVERSITY AND THE METHODIST TRADITION1 WILLIAM E. PIKE Ever since William F. Buckley, Jr.'s 1951 work, God and Man at Yale, a debate has raged openly in the United States and beyond regarding the "sec­ ularization'' of once-Christian institutions of higher learning. Proponents of universities free of church ties have argued that religion hinders the free' exchange of ideas, the growth of scientific research, and the open expression of differing student personalities. Critics of secularization feel thatby shed­ ding years of Christian tradition, universities go adrift without a moral com­ pass or a true appreciation for the historical pillars upon which they were founded . ., As with so many of its counterparts, Duke University faces these ques- tions. Undoubtedly once a solidly Christian school .:... and in particular a Methodist school - it now exhibits the characteristics of a modem, secular university. Its solid ties to the church amount to an overtly Christian divini ... ty school, with a decisive United Methodist bent, and a traditional, informal , · tie between the university Board of Trustees and the North Carolina Annual Conferences of United Methodism. This paper explores to some degree the journey the school has taken to this point, and also asks the important ques­ tion, Is Duke still a United Methodist university? I In its earliest days the institution which would someday become known as Duke was operated mainly by Christians, and more specifically, by Methodists. However, that does not mean it was automatically a Methodist institution. Indeed, for some years during its early history it was not offi..
  • ABSTRACT BARR, KRISPIN WAGONER. the Historical Legacy of a Secret Society at Duke University

    ABSTRACT BARR, KRISPIN WAGONER. the Historical Legacy of a Secret Society at Duke University

    ABSTRACT BARR, KRISPIN WAGONER. The Historical Legacy of a Secret Society at Duke University (1913-1971): Cultural Hegemony and the Tenacious Ideals of the “Big Man on Campus.” (Under the direction of Dr. Audrey Jaeger). Collegiate secret societies, as distinguished from Greek-letter fraternal organizations, enjoyed prominence within many American campus communities from the early nineteenth century through the mid-twentieth century (Baird, 1879; Hitchcock, 1863; Slosson, 1910; Veysey, 1965). The establishment of these elite groups preceded the maturation of university administrative structures responsible for managing students’ extracurricular life, as well as the mass democratization of American higher education which occurred after World War II (Rudolph, 1990; Cohen, 2010). The presence of prestigious secret societies is documented and celebrated in college yearbooks and newspapers, reflecting a period in higher education’s past when the hegemony of the white, male prevailed in student culture and fostered the composite ideal of the “Big Man on Campus” (“B.M.O.C.”) – the handsome varsity athlete, fraternity man, and club president destined for success in American public life. Although collegiate secret societies “disappeared” on many campuses in the Civil Rights Era amidst accusations of elitism and reactions against established white, Anglo- Saxon Protestant norms, their legacy lingers into the twenty-first century, along with many unanswered questions about their historical role as a source of student power on campus. Their roots can be traced to the prestigious all-male boarding schools of the Northeastern United States in the late nineteenth century where patterns of upper-class masculine socialization developed. Due to a dearth of historical research on this topic, however, institutional leaders are challenged to understand the origins, purpose, and legacy of this type of student association that still holds meaning for students and other stakeholders in some campus communities.
  • In the Supreme Court of the United States

    In the Supreme Court of the United States

    No. In the Supreme Court of the United States DAVID F. EVANS; COLLIN FINNERTY; READE SELIGMANN, PETITIONERS v. CITY OF DURHAM, NORTH CAROLINA, ET AL. ON PETITION FOR A WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT PETITION FOR A WRIT OF CERTIORARI DAVID S. RUDOLF KANNON K. SHANMUGAM RUDOLF WIDENHOUSE Counsel of Record & FIALKO CHRISTOPHER N. MANNING 225 East Worthington JAMES M. MCDONALD Avenue #200 LUKE MCCLOUD Charlotte, NC 28203 WILLIAMS & CONNOLLY LLP 725 Twelfth Street, N.W. RICHARD D. EMERY Washington, DC 20005 ILANN M. MAAZEL (202) 434-5000 EMERY CELLI [email protected] BRINCKERHOFF & ABADY LLP 75 Rockefeller Plaza, 20th Floor New York, NY 10019 QUESTION PRESENTED Whether police officers who conspire with a prosecu- tor to fabricate evidence for subsequent use are immune from liability as a matter of law by virtue of the conspir- ing prosecutor’s decision to use the evidence. (I) PARTIES TO THE PROCEEDING Petitioners are David F. Evans; Collin Finnerty; and Reade Seligmann. Respondents are the City of Durham, North Carolina; David Addison; Patrick Baker; Steven W. Chalmers; Beverly Council; Mark Gottlieb; Benjamin Himan; Ronald Hodge; Jeff Lamb; Michael Ripberger; and Lee Russ. (II) TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Opinions below ................................................................................ 1 Jurisdiction ...................................................................................... 1 Statement ........................................................................................