Phylogenetic Placement and Taxonomic Review of the Genus Cryptosporella and Its Synonyms Ophiovalsa and Winterella (Gnomoniaceae, Diaporthales)
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
mycological research 112 (2008) 23–35 journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/mycres Phylogenetic placement and taxonomic review of the genus Cryptosporella and its synonyms Ophiovalsa and Winterella (Gnomoniaceae, Diaporthales) Luis C. MEJI´Aa,b,*, Lisa A. CASTLEBURYb, Amy Y. ROSSMANb, Mikhail V. SOGONOVa,b, James F. WHITEa aDepartment of Plant Biology and Pathology, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ 08901, USA bSystematic Botany & Mycology Laboratory, USDA Agricultural Research Service, Beltsville, Maryland 20705-2350, USA article info abstract Article history: The type species of Cryptosporella, C. hypodermia, and Ophiovalsa, O. suffusa, as well as Received 29 December 2006 closely related species were studied using morphological, cultural, and DNA sequence Accepted 18 March 2007 characteristics. DNA sequence data from three different loci (ITS, LSU, and RPB2) suggest Corresponding Editor: Rajesh Jeewon that C. hypodermia and O. suffusa are congeneric within the Gnomoniaceae (Diaporthales). This result is supported by similarities in perithecial, ascal and ascospore morphology, Keywords: and lifestyles characterized as initially endophytic, becoming saprobic as plant tissues Disculina die. Furthermore, both type species produce Disculina anamorphs. A review of the literature Endophyte indicates that the generic name Cryptosporella has priority over Ophiovalsa and its synonym Pyrenomycetes Winterella sensu Reid & Booth (1987). A redescription of the genus Cryptosporella is included, RNA polymerase as well as a description of C. hypodermia, C. suffusa, the type species of Ophiovalsa, a brief Systematics account of the other seven species accepted in Cryptosporella, and a key to species of Cryp- tosporella. Eight new combinations are established: C. alnicola (Fr.) L.C. Mejı´a & Castleb., comb. nov.; C. betulae (Tul. & C. Tul.) L.C. Mejı´a & Castleb., comb. nov.; C. confusa (Reid & Booth) L.C. Mejı´a & Castleb., comb. nov.; C. corylina (Tul. & C. Tul.) L.C. Mejı´a & Castleb., comb. nov.; C. femoralis (Peck) L.C. Mejı´a & Castleb., comb. nov.; C. suffusa (Fr.) L.C. Mejı´a & Castleb., comb. nov.; C. tiliae (Tul. & C. Tul.) L.C. Mejı´a & Castleb., comb. nov.; and C. wehmeyeriana (Reid & Booth) L.C. Mejı´a & Castleb., comb. nov. ª 2007 The British Mycological Society. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. Introduction branches, their fruiting bodies are inconspicuous, appearing as raised bumps as they develop underneath bark, eventually Species in the genus Cryptosporella,asOphiovalsa and Winter- evident as short, black beaks erumpent through the bark sur- ella (Gnomoniaceae, Diaporthales), are known throughout the face. These species are also encountered as endophytes on temperate regions, especially North America Europe and their hardwood hosts, producing their Disculina anamorphic Japan, as saprobes, endophytes, and occasionally, as patho- states in culture (Barengo et al. 2000; Ganley et al. 2004). gens on hardwood trees especially Alnus, Betula, Corylus, Tilia, The genus Cryptosporella was described by Saccardo (1877) and Ulmus (Barr 1978; Chlebicki 2002; Glawe & Jensen 1986; to distinguish fungi that were classified as Cryptospora Tulasne Green 2004; Kobayashi 1970; Reid & Booth 1987, 1989; Spauld- & Tulasne (1863), but differed in ascospore shape. At that time ing 1961). Usually sporulating on small, overwintered species of Cryptospora were distinguished by having one to * Corresponding author. E-mail address: [email protected] 0953-7562/$ – see front matter ª 2007 The British Mycological Society. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. doi:10.1016/j.mycres.2007.03.021 24 L. C. Mejı´a et al. several-celled, long cylindrical ascospores. Based on the type used to store collection information and images and to mea- species Cryptosporella hypodermia, Cryptosporella was defined sure specimen structures as described by Sogonov (2005). by having species with hyaline, one-celled, oval to fusoid as- Cultures derived from recent collections and collections cospores. The distinction of these two genera based on shape made during the course of this study were obtained by means and size of ascospores was accepted by many mycologists of single spore isolation on corn meal agar (CMA, Sigma, (Arx & Mu¨ ller 1954; Barr 1978, 1991; Berlese 1900; Dennis St. Louis, MO) supplemented with antibiotics (1 % solution 1978; Ho¨ hnel 1917, 1918; Munk 1957; Traverso 1906; Wehmeyer 0.2 % streptomycin sulphate, and 0.2 % neomycin). Type spec- 1926). Other scientists (Ellis & Everhart 1892; Winter 1887) rec- imens of C. hypodermia and O. suffusa were sectioned for de- ognized Cryptosporella as a subgenus of Cryptospora and consid- tailed observation of perithecial structures. Small pieces of ered that shared characteristics such as arrangement and the substrata containing perithecia were excised and boiled position of perithecia, perithecial neck, habit, type of stroma, in distilled water for hydration during 90 min and left over- and asci were enough to retain these taxa in a single genus. night. For histological studies, tissue was prepared as in Petrak (1966) erected the genus Ophiovalsa based on Crypto- Torres et al. (2005). In brief, tissue was dehydrated in ethanol, spora suffusa when he realized that Cryptospora Tulasne & embedded in LR WhiteÒ acrylic resin, sectioned in slices of Tulasne 1863 was a later homonym of Cryptospora Karelin & 4 mm using glass knives, and stained in aniline blue (0.1 % Kirilow 1842 in the Brassicaceae. Reid & Booth (1987, 1989) aqueous) followed by toluidine blue (0.1 % aqueous) for 20 s treated C. hypodermia as congeneric with O. suffusa and placed in each stain. these two species and others in the genus Winterella. Discrep- Cultural studies ancies regarding the generic concepts and uncertainty as to which morphological traits to use for differentiating genera Cultures were plated in duplicate on three different media: and species, coupled with poor scientific communication dur- malt extract agar (MEA, Bacto, Becton, Dickinson & Co., ing the 1800s and first half of the 1900s, may have contributed Sparks, MD), potato dextrose agar (PDA, Difco, Becton, Dickin- to several nomenclatural and taxonomic problems related to son & Co., Sparks, MD), and CMA. Agar plugs 5 mm in diam these taxa that still persist today (see Discussion below). from the edge of actively growing colonies were used as inoc- A review of the order Diaporthales by Castlebury et al. (2002) ula for cultural studies. Cultures were grown at 23 C under based on LSU rDNA sequences revealed that O. suffusa and 12 h UV/white light and 12 h of dark. Radial growth measure- Cryptosporella hypodermia are closely related within the Gnomo- ments and phenotypic character observations were made at niaceae, but the details of this relationship were not resolved. 7, 14, and 21 d after plating. Two perpendicular colony diame- Additional DNA sequence data and morphological observa- ter measurements were made for each culture replicate. The tions suggest that several species described in these genera colony diameter presented represents the average of all mea- are congeneric. In order to determine the relationship of surements for a particular species. Colours assigned to colo- Ophiovalsa based on O. suffusa, including Winterella sensu nies are based on the colour chart by Rayner (1970). Reid & Booth (1987) with Cryptosporella based on C. hypodermia, both molecular and morphological evidence were obtained. A DNA extraction and PCR amplification redescription of the genus Cryptosporella and its type species, C. hypodermia, as well as the type species of Ophiovalsa, and One square centimetre of mycelium was scraped from the sur- an account of the genus as a whole is presented. face of actively growing cultures (about one-week old) and used for DNA extractions. Mycelium was lysed using Fast Prep FP120 (Thermo Electron Corporation, Milford, MA) or liquid nitrogen. Material and methods DNA was extracted using DNAeasy Plant mini kit (Qiagen, Valencia, CAUSA) or Puregene DNA Isolation kit (Gentra Systems, Morphological observations Minneapolis, MN) following the manufacturers’ instructions. The ITS regions 1 and 2, including 5.8 S rDNA ITS DNA, were Specimens representing species of Winterella sensu Reid & amplified with primers ITS5 and ITS4 (White et al. 1990). A re- Booth (1987) and the type species Ophiovalsa suffusa and Cryp- gion in the RNA polymerase second LSU (RPB2) was amplified tosporella hypodermia were examined. Morphological observa- with primers fRPB2-5F and fRPB2-7cR (Liu et al. 1999). LSU tions included macroscopic appearance and microscopic rDNA was amplified using primers LR0R and LR7 (Rehner & characters, such as size, shape, colour and arrangement of Samuels 1994; Vilgalys & Hester 1990). Amplifications were asci, ascospores, perithecial wall, and perithecial ostiolar tis- carried out in 50-ml reactions on an iCyclerÔ thermal cycler sues. Specimens were observed with a Zeiss SV 11 Apo (Carl (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Hercules, CA) under the following reac- Zeiss, NY) dissecting microscope and Zeiss Axiophot micro- tion conditions: 5–15 ng genomic DNA, 200 mM each dNTP, 2.5 scope (Carl Zeiss) with conventional brightfield or Nomarski units Amplitaq (Perkin Elmer), 2 mM of each primer and the sup- differential interference contrast microscopy. Perithecia and plied 10Â buffer with 15 mM MgCl2. The thermal cycler pro- pycnidia were placed in a drop of 3 % aqueous potassium hy- gram for ITS was as follows: 2 min at 94 C followed by 35 droxide