Sustainability Appraisal of Gravesham Local Plan Stage 2 Regulation 18 Consultation

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Sustainability Appraisal of Gravesham Local Plan Stage 2 Regulation 18 Consultation Gravesham Borough Council Sustainability Appraisal of Gravesham Local Plan Stage 2 Regulation 18 Consultation Final report Prepared by LUC October 2020 Gravesham Borough Council Sustainability Appraisal of Gravesham Local Plan Stage 2 Regulation 18 Consultation Project Number 10837 Version Status Prepared Checked Approved Date 1. Draft report J Pearson K Nicholls T Livingston 15.10.2020 K Nicholls E Hynes E Smith K Kaczor K Moroney 2. Final report J Pearson K Nicholls T Livingston 22.10.2020 K Nicholls E Hynes E Smith K Kaczor K Moroney Bristol Land Use Consultants Ltd Landscape Design Edinburgh Registered in England Strategic Planning & Assessment Glasgow Registered number 2549296 Development Planning London Registered office: Urban Design & Masterplanning Manchester 250 Waterloo Road Environmental Impact Assessment London SE1 8RD Landscape Planning & Assessment landuse.co.uk Landscape Management 100% recycled paper Ecology Historic Environment GIS & Visualisation Contents SA of Gravesham Local Plan October 2020 Contents Chapter 1 Chapter 5 Introduction 1 SA findings for preferred site allocations and reasonable alternatives 42 The Local Plan area 1 The Local Plan 2 Sustainability Appraisal and Strategic Environmental Chapter 6 Assessment 3 SA findings for preferred development Habitats Regulations Assessment 5 management policies and reasonable Structure of this report 5 alternatives 57 Green belt 57 Chapter 2 Agricultural land 63 Methodology 7 Retail 64 Infrastructure 69 SA Stage A: Scoping 8 Renewable and Low Carbon Energy 74 SA Stage B: Developing and refining options and Green infrastructure 75 assessing effects 10 Landscape Character 78 SA Stage C: Preparing the Sustainability Appraisal report 12 Biodiversity 79 SA Stage D: Consultation on the Local Plan and the SA Report 12 Flood Risk and Water 80 SA Stage E: Monitoring implementation of the Local Plan 12 Residential 84 Difficulties Encountered 12 Amenity 90 Design 93 Heritage assets 96 Chapter 3 Recommendations 98 Sustainability context and SA framework 14 Chapter 7 Key issues 15 Recommendations and monitoring 103 The SA framework 16 Recommendations 103 Monitoring 103 Chapter 4 SA findings for Core Strategy Partial Review reasonable alternatives 23 Chapter 8 Conclusions and Next steps 108 A profile of Gravesham 23 Vison and strategic objectives 23 Next steps 108 Meeting the Borough's housing needs 24 Delivering economic prosperity 27 Appendix A Where and how should the Borough’s development Consultation comments A-1 needs be met? 29 Green Belt and inset settlement boundaries 35 Consultation comments received in relation to the SA of Open spaces and Local Green Space 37 Regulation 18 Stage 1 documents A-2 Infrastructure and services provision 39 Comments from the focussed Scoping consultation A-4 Climate change 39 LUC I i Contents SA of Gravesham Local Plan October 2020 Contents Appendix B Detailed sustainability context B-1 Population, health and wellbeing B-1 Economy 9 Transport connections and travel habits 12 Air, land and water quality 15 Climate change adaptation and mitigation 21 Biodiversity 26 Historic environment 30 Landscape 32 Appendix C Assumptions applied in the SA of site options C-1 Appendix D Detailed SA findings for the Reasonable Alternative Site Options D-1 Appendix E Council’s reasons for selecting preferred options in light of reasonable alternatives E-1 LUC I ii Chapter- 1 Introduction SA of Gravesham Local Plan October 2020 Chapter 1 Introduction This report has been prepared by LUC on behalf of Gravesham Borough Council to document the current stage of the integrated Sustainability Appraisal (SA) and Strategic Environmental Assessment (SEA) of the Gravesham Local Plan. Gravesham Borough Council adopted its Local Plan Core Strategy in 2014. The Government requires local planning authorities to review their Local Plans every five years and a review of the adopted Gravesham Local Plan Core Strategy has identified that while most of it is still relevant, a limited number of policies relating to the amount of development needed in the Borough have become out of date. Therefore, the Council is required by Government to go through the process of updating its Local Plan Core Strategy as soon as is practicably possible - this process is referred to as the Local Plan Core Strategy Partial Review. As well as the Partial Review of the Local Plan Core Strategy policies, Gravesham Borough Council is also identifying development site allocations and preparing development management policies. At the present stage of consultation (Regulation 181), the Local Plan Core Strategy Partial Review policies and the site allocations are presented in one document and the development management policies are set out separately. The Council intends that all three components will be combined into a single document at the next (Regulation 192) stage of consultation. This report relates to the Stage 2 Preferred Approach (Regulation 18) versions of the Local Plan Core Strategy Partial Review and Site Allocations (October 2020) and the Development Management Policies Document (October 2020) and it should be read in conjunction with those two documents. The Local Plan area3 Gravesham Borough is located on the south bank of the River Thames in the north of Kent, approximately 20 miles east of London. It is broadly triangular in shape and stretches from the River Thames in the north to the crest of the North Downs in the south. The Borough is bounded by the local _____________________________________________________________________________________________________ 1 Regulation 18 of the Town and Country Planning (Local Planning) (England) 2 Regulation 19 of the Town and Country Planning (Local Planning) (England) Regulations 2012 SI No. 2012/767, covering ‘preparation of a local plan’. Regulations 2012 SI No. 2012/767, covering ‘publication of a local plan’. 3 Gravesham Borough Council (2014) Gravesham Local Plan Core Strategy LUC I 1 Chapter 1 Introduction SA of Gravesham Local Plan October 2020 authorities of Dartford and Sevenoaks to the west, Tonbridge Development). The Local Plan Core Strategy Partial Review and Malling to the south and Medway to the east. Thurrock and Site Allocations consultation document (October 2020) lies to the north, on the opposite side of the River Thames. includes information in Appendix 3 about which of the policies in the adopted Local Plan Core Strategy are to be retained The Borough is bisected from east to west by the A2/M2 and so are not subject to the partial review. Topic areas that trunk road and by the High Speed 1 railway line. The A2/M2 are being reviewed are: provides access to Greater London and the Channel Ports as well as the M25. The High Speed 1 line links Gravesend to ◼ Vision and Strategic objectives London St Pancras with journey times of approximately 25 ◼ Meeting the Borough’s housing needs minutes, passing through Ebbsfleet with links to Paris, Lille and Brussels. ◼ Delivering economic prosperity The population of the Borough was 101,700 in 2011, ◼ Where and how should the Borough’s development compared to around 95,700 when the 2001 census was taken. needs be met? The Gravesend and Northfleet conurbation lies to the north of ◼ Green Belt and inset settlement boundaries the A2 alongside the River Thames. They are the principal settlements with the widest range of services and facilities, ◼ Open spaces and local green space most of the employment space, and where about 80% of the ◼ Infrastructure and services provision population of the Borough lives. ◼ Climate change Outside of Gravesend and Northfleet, the Borough is predominantly rural and 78% of the Borough is designated as The site allocations component of the Core Strategy part of the London Metropolitan Green Belt. 40% of the Green Partial Review document will identify specific locations for Belt is designated either as part of the Thames Estuary and residential, employment and mixed use development and local Marshes Ramsar site or as part of the Kent Downs Area of green spaces. Outstanding Natural Beauty (AONB). The Borough has a rich The Development Management Policies Document will historic built environment, much of which derives from its contain detailed policies for guiding and managing extensive maritime, military, industrial and transport history. development in the Borough. Topics covered are: The Local Plan ◼ Green Belt The Development Plan for Gravesham Borough ◼ Agricultural land currently comprises: ◼ Retail ◼ The Gravesham Local Plan Core Strategy (September ◼ Infrastructure 2014) ◼ Renewable and low carbon energy ◼ The Kent Minerals and Waste Local Plan 2013-2030 (July 2016) including the Kent Minerals and Waste Local ◼ Green infrastructure Plan Early Partial Review (October 2019) ◼ Landscape character ◼ Saved policies from the Gravesham Local Plan First ◼ Biodiversity Review (November 1994) ◼ Flood risk and water ◼ The draft South East Marine Plan (January 2019). ◼ Residential Following adoption of the Local Plan Core Strategy in September 2014, Gravesham Borough Council commissioned ◼ Amenity a study to identify the Borough’s revised objectively assessed ◼ Design housing need going forward. This study, the Strategic Housing and Economic Needs Assessment (SHENA), identified that ◼ Heritage assets the Borough’s objectively assessed housing need had The Development Management Policies Document will increased since the adoption of the Local Plan Core Strategy. be prepared in line with the strategic priorities and policies in The Government’s standard
Recommended publications
  • 5A Planning Applications
    PLANNING APPLICATIONS FOR 2 JANUARY 2008 Page no. 1 MC2007/0014 Peninsula Application for deemed planning permission under Section 90(2) of The Town and Country Planning Act 1990 for construction of two advanced supercritical (ASC) coal-fired generating units (demolition of power station) Kingsnorth Power Station, Kingsnorth, Hoo St. Werburgh, Rochester, Kent 3 2 MC2007/1517 Watling Subdivision of 1,817sqm floor area of existing Retail Warehouse into 2 separate and independent retail units and sale of non DIY goods. B&Q Plc Will Adams Way Gillingham Kent ME8 6BY 7 3 MC2007/1912 Watling Subdivision of 1,817sqm floor area of existing Retail Warehouse into a separate retail unit, provision of mezzanine to provide 1417sqm additional floorspace and sale of non DIY goods B&Q Plc Will Adams Way Gillingham Kent ME8 6BY 76 4 MC2005/0814 Luton & Wayfield Application for approval of reserved matters pursuant to condition 1 of MC2003/1285 for demolition of existing buildings and construction of three blocks of flats comprising of 96 residential units, associated garaging and landscaping 2 Ash Tree Lane Chatham Kent ME5 7BZ 87 5 MC2005/1707 Twydall Retrospective application for the construction of fire escape route and retaining wall Units A to E Invicta Business Centre, land adjoining Beechings Way, Gillingham, Kent. 90 6 MC2007/0265 Rainham Central Construction of a block of lock up garages Land between 21 and 23 Asquith Road Rainham Gillingham Kent 96 7 MC2007/1372 Strood Rural Proposed height increase of 14.3 metre high monopole by 2.5 metres to
    [Show full text]
  • Landscape Assessment of Kent 2004
    CHILHAM: STOUR VALLEY Location map: CHILHAMCHARACTER AREA DESCRIPTION North of Bilting, the Stour Valley becomes increasingly enclosed. The rolling sides of the valley support large arable fields in the east, while sweeps of parkland belonging to Godmersham Park and Chilham Castle cover most of the western slopes. On either side of the valley, dense woodland dominate the skyline and a number of substantial shaws and plantations on the lower slopes reflect the importance of game cover in this area. On the valley bottom, the river is picked out in places by waterside alders and occasional willows. The railway line is obscured for much of its length by trees. STOUR VALLEY Chilham lies within the larger character area of the Stour Valley within the Kent Downs AONB. The Great Stour is the most easterly of the three rivers cutting through the Downs. Like the Darent and the Medway, it too provided an early access route into the heart of Kent and formed an ancient focus for settlement. Today the Stour Valley is highly valued for the quality of its landscape, especially by the considerable numbers of walkers who follow the Stour Valley Walk or the North Downs Way National Trail. Despite its proximity to both Canterbury and Ashford, the Stour Valley retains a strong rural identity. Enclosed by steep scarps on both sides, with dense woodlands on the upper slopes, the valley is dominated by intensively farmed arable fields interspersed by broad sweeps of mature parkland. Unusually, there are no electricity pylons cluttering the views across the valley. North of Bilting, the river flows through a narrow, pastoral floodplain, dotted with trees such as willow and alder and drained by small ditches.
    [Show full text]
  • 113. North Kent Plain Area Profile: Supporting Documents
    National Character 113. North Kent Plain Area profile: Supporting documents www.gov.uk/natural-england 1 National Character 113. North Kent Plain Area profile: Supporting documents Introduction National Character Areas map As part of Natural England’s responsibilities as set out in the Natural Environment 1 2 3 White Paper , Biodiversity 2020 and the European Landscape Convention , we North are revising profiles for England’s 159 National Character Areas (NCAs). These are East areas that share similar landscape characteristics, and which follow natural lines in the landscape rather than administrative boundaries, making them a good Yorkshire decision-making framework for the natural environment. & The North Humber NCA profiles are guidance documents which can help communities to inform their West decision-making about the places that they live in and care for. The information they contain will support the planning of conservation initiatives at a landscape East scale, inform the delivery of Nature Improvement Areas and encourage broader Midlands partnership working through Local Nature Partnerships. The profiles will also help West Midlands to inform choices about how land is managed and can change. East of England Each profile includes a description of the natural and cultural features that shape our landscapes, how the landscape has changed over time, the current key London drivers for ongoing change, and a broad analysis of each area’s characteristics and ecosystem services. Statements of Environmental Opportunity (SEOs) are South East suggested, which draw on this integrated information. The SEOs offer guidance South West on the critical issues, which could help to achieve sustainable growth and a more secure environmental future.
    [Show full text]
  • Contaminated Land Strategy
    Gravesham Borough Council Contaminated Land Strategy Required under the provisions of the Environmental Protection Act 1990 Section 78B July 2001 Revision 1: August 2009 Revision 2: 2 January 2013 1 Contents Page 1. Introduction & Overview 3 2. The Strategy 8 3. The Implementation of the Gravesham Strategy 11 4. Procedures 12 5. Risk Assessment 15 6. Obtaining further information on pollutant linkages and the risk assessment 16 process 7. Liaison and Communication 17 8. The written record of determination and formal notification 19 9. Review Mechanisms 20 10. Information Management 21 Appendices 1. Details of statutory Consultees and relevant contacts 22 2. Glossary of terms 23 3. Gravesham’s Past and Current Industrial History 25 Acknowledgements Geoff Baker of Gravesham Borough Council’s Planning Services Department is thanked for providing the comprehensive information on Gravesham’s current and past Industrial History. 2 1.0 INTRODUCTION & OVERVIEW 1.1 The Environmental Protection Act (EPA) 1990 states at section 78B (1) that: Every local authority shall cause its area to be inspected from time to time for the purpose - (a) of identifying contaminated land; and (b) of enabling the authority to decide whether any such land is land which is required to be a special site (see appendix 2). 1.2 Section 78B (2) states that authorities must act in accordance with guidance issued by the Secretary of State in this respect. Statutory guidance was first published within the Department of the Environment Transport & Regions Circular 02/2000, dated the 20th March 2000. This was replaced by Defra Circular 01/2006 dated 4th August 2006 which covered radioactive contamination of land.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix 12.1: Assessment of Air Quality Impacts on Ecological Receptors
    Thurrock Flexible Generation Plant Preliminary Environmental Information Report: Appendix 12.1: Assessment of Air Quality Impacts on Ecological Receptors Date: September 2018 Appendix 12.1: Assessment of Air Quality Impacts on Ecological Receptors Preliminary Environmental Information Report September 2018 Environmental Impact Assessment Preliminary Environmental Information Report Volume 6 Copyright © RPS Appendix 12.1 The material presented in this report is confidential. This report has been prepared for the exclusive use of Thurrock Power Ltd and shall not be distributed or made available to any other company or person without the knowledge and written consent of RPS. Report Number: OXF10872 Version: Final Date: September 2018 This report is also downloadable from the Thurrock Flexible Generation Plant website at: Prepared by: Rosemary Challen http://www.thurrockpower.co.uk Contributors: Kathryn Barker Checked by: Fiona Prismall Thurrock Power Ltd 1st Floor 145 Kensington Church Street London W8 7LP i Appendix 12.1: Assessment of Air Quality Impacts on Ecological Receptors Preliminary Environmental Information Report September 2018 Table of Contents 1. Assessment of Air Quality Impacts on Ecological Receptors ............................................... 1 1.1 Introduction ................................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Approach ....................................................................................................................... 1 1.3 Critical
    [Show full text]
  • Environmental Impact Assessment Scoping Report - Appendices
    LOWER THAMES CROSSING - ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT SCOPING REPORT - APPENDICES Appendix A – Biodiversity Table of Consultation Contact Organisation Relevance Date of Topic of communication to project correspondence June 2013 Written feedback on basic options for a new Lower Thames Crossing. November 2014 Letter issued to request to provide technical information to inform route options development work, response received. January 2015 Workshop 1: To present to statutory environmental bodies (SEBs) on emerging thinking regarding route options and draft approach to environmental appraisal. Note to inform on the HRA March 2015 Workshop 2: Presentation of Designated long list of route options and sites (SPA, Natural update on progress regarding SAC, England development of environmental Ramsar and appraisal, details of crossing SSSI) options and request for formal feedback on environmental appraisal findings. April 2015 Email feedback on environmental appraisal approach requested by LTC at Environment Workshop 2. June 2015 Workshop 3: To obtain feedback on the draft shortlist and rejected options; the detailed assessment of the shortlist; proposed methodology and survey work; update on the crossing types. July 2015 Telephone conference to discuss approach to bird survey methodology required ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT – SCOPING REPORT HE540039-CJV-GEN-GEN-REP-ENV-00001 DATE PUBLISHED - 09/10/2017 UNCONTROLLED WHEN PRINTED – COPYRIGHT © - 2017 – HIGHWAYS ENGLAND COMPANY LIMITED – ALL RIGHTS RESERVED LOWER THAMES CROSSING - ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT SCOPING REPORT - APPENDICES Organisation Relevance Date of Topic of communication to project correspondence to support DCO application and to inform options appraisal Email feedback on draft short list of options; survey and appraisal approach; design and opportunities requested at Workshop 3.
    [Show full text]
  • Open Space Assessment Report
    GRAVESHAM BOROUGH COUNCIL OPEN SPACE ASSESSMENT REPORT APRIL 2016 Integrity, Innovation, Inspiration 1-2 Frecheville Court off Knowsley Street Bury BL9 0UF T 0161 764 7040 F 0161 764 7490 E [email protected] www.kkp.co.uk Quality assurance Name Date Report origination/ CMF/AB January 2016 Revised April 2016 Quality control CF January 2016 Client comments GBC Feb/April 2016 Agreed sign off Glossary ........................................................................................................................ 4 PART 1: INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................ 2 1.1 Report structure ...................................................................................................... 3 1.2 National context ...................................................................................................... 4 1.3 Local context ........................................................................................................... 4 PART 2: METHODOLOGY ............................................................................................... 5 2.1 Analysis areas ......................................................................................................... 5 2.2 Auditing local provision (supply) .............................................................................. 6 2.3 Quality and value .................................................................................................... 7 2.4 Quality and value thresholds ..................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Shorne, Cobham and Luddesdown Ward
    3 Chapter 3: Shorne, Cobham and Luddesdown ward This chapter summarises the activities in Shorne, Cobham and Luddesdown ward relating to the project’s construction and its operational phase (when the new road is open). It also explains the measures intended to reduce the project’s impacts on the local area. For more information about the assessments in this chapter and other information available during this consultation, see chapter 1, which also includes a map showing all the wards described in this document. Within this document, we sometimes advise where additional information can be found in other consultation documents, including the Construction update, Operations update, You said, we did, Register of Environmental Actions and Commitments (REAC), Code of Construction Practice (CoCP), Outline Traffic Management Plan for Construction (OTMPfC) and Design principles. To find out more about these documents, see chapter 1. References to these documents provide an indication as to how our proposals to reduce the project’s impacts will be secured within our application for development consent. 80 Lower Thames Crossing Ward impact summaries 2021 Figure 3.1: Ward boundary map for Shorne, Cobham and Luddesdown ward Shorne, Cobham and Luddesdown Legend Boundary of Ward(s) 0 0.35 0.7 1.05 1.4 km Contains Ordnance Survey data. © Crown copyright and database rights 2021. Ordnance Survey 100030649 Lower Thames Crossing Ward impact summaries 2021 81 3.1 Overview 3.1.1 About this ward Shorne, Cobham and Luddesdown ward is located south of the River Thames in the borough of Gravesham. The ward is approximately 34km2 in size and has an estimated population of 4,2721.
    [Show full text]
  • Knockholt Downs
    KNOCKHOLT DOWNS Location map: ThisCHARACTER is an intimate, AREA enclosed DESCRIPTION landscape of ridges and dry valleys extending north-west from the scarp within the West Darent character area of the Kent Downs AONB. Although densely settled, the undulating topography and extensive network of lacy woodlands often conceal the suburban dwellings that have straggled down the country lanes earlier this century. Suburbanisation is often intensified, however, by the presence of pavements on the lanes, conifer hedges and brick walls around gardens, the latter often accessed through elaborate entrance gates into the larger properties. The ridge-top broadleaf woodlands and remnant shaws enclose small grazed fields, particularly in or close to the dry valleys that dissect the landscape to the north. The hedgerows and fields are often distinguished by large, mature oaks and beech, which may mark lines of old hedgerows or shaws. The views north and west over the valleys to the wooded ridges of Bromley give an impression of an enclosed and seemingly sparsely populated landscape which is deceptive. On the flatter, plateau areas between the dry valleys and the scarp top, the land is often cultivated in larger, open fields. Between the suburban housing are the vernacular centres of what were once smaller villages such as Halstead and Knockholt itself. Here the older buildings are characteristically brick or flint. next >> Prepared for Kent County Council by Jacobs Babtie KNOCKHOLT DOWNS PHOTOGRAPH CONTEXT Regional: North West Kent Condition CONSERVE & REINFORCE CONSERVE good REINFORCE CREATE & CONSERVE & CONSERVE & moderate REINFORCE CREATE RESTORE RESTORE & CREATE RESTORE CREATE poor low moderate high CHARACTERISTIC FEATURES Undulating topography of ridges and dry valleys.
    [Show full text]
  • Download Inner Thames Hub Estuary Feasibility Studies
    INNER THAMES HUB ESTUARY Feasibility Studies May 2014 Inner Thames Estuary Feasibility Studies Contents Contents ................................................................................................................................................. ii Acronyms and Abbreviations ............................................................................................................. iii Executive Summary ............................................................................................................................. iv Study 1: Environmental/Natura 2000 impacts ................................................................................. 1-5 1-1 Background........................................................................................................................... 1-5 1-2 The Natura 2000 Legal Tests ............................................................................................... 1-6 1-3 Review of Natura 2000 Habitats and Species Affected ....................................................... 1-8 1-4 Impacts, Issues and Risks to Natura 2000 Features.......................................................... 1-12 1-5 Overall Stability of the Ecosystem ...................................................................................... 1-17 1-6 Case Studies ...................................................................................................................... 1-18 1-7 Compensation....................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Gravesham Authority Monitoring Report April 2016 - March 2017
    Gravesham Authority Monitoring Report April 2016 - March 2017 Gravesham Authority Monitoring Report (2016 – 17) 1 INTRODUCTION.......................................................................................... 3 2 THE DEVELOPMENT PLAN ....................................................................... 4 3 LOCAL DEVELOPMENT SCHEME ............................................................ 5 4 SUMMARY .................................................................................................. 7 Local Development Scheme (LDS) ......................................................................................... 7 Context – Population, Economy and Housing ....................................................................... 7 Gravesham Local Plan Core Strategy Monitoring – Development Summary ....................... 8 5 CONTEXT .................................................................................................... 9 Population .............................................................................................................................. 14 Economic Profile ................................................................................................................... 16 Housing .................................................................................................................................. 19 6 DUTY TO CO-OPERATE .......................................................................... 29 General strategic working ...................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Risk Maps for Individual Host Species and Lists of Designated Sites at Risk
    APPENDIX 2: RISK MAPS FOR INDIVIDUAL HOST SPECIES AND LISTS OF DESIGNATED SITES AT RISK. Figure 1 Risk posed to V. myrtillus under the three different risk scenarios. .......................... 2 Figure 2 Risk posed to V. vitis-idaea under the three different risk scenarios. ....................... 3 Figure 3. Risk posed to C. vulgaris under the three different risk scenarios. .......................... 4 Figure 4 Risk posed to SSSIs for species V. myrtillus, V. vitis-idaea, A. uva-ursi and C. vulgaris under the three different risk scenarios. ............................................................. 5 Figure 5 Risk posed to SSSIs for species V. myrtillus, V. vitis-idaea and A. uva-ursi under the three different risk scenarios. ..................................................................................... 6 Figure 6 Risk posed to SPAs for species V. myrtillus, V. vitis-idaea, A. uva-ursi and C. vulgaris under the three different risk scenarios. ............................................................. 7 Figure 7 Risk posed to SPAs for species V. myrtillus, V. vitis-idaea and A. uva-ursi under the three different risk scenarios. ........................................................................................... 8 Figure 8 Risk posed to SACs for species V. myrtillus, V. vitis-idaea, A. uva-ursi and C. vulgaris under the three different risk scenarios. ............................................................. 9 Figure 9 Risk posed to SACs for species, V. myrtillus, V. vitis-idaea and A. uva-ursi under the three different risk scenarios. ................................................................................... 10 Table 1 Lists of all SPAs selected out as potentially suitable, with details of the total suitable area and their inclusion in each of the risk scenarios. ................................................... 11 Table 2 Lists of all SACs selected out as potentially suitable, with details of the total suitable area and their inclusion in each of the risk scenarios.
    [Show full text]