DOCSLIB.ORG

Download Inner Thames Hub Estuary Feasibility Studies

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Download Inner Thames Hub Estuary Feasibility Studies INNER THAMES HUB ESTUARY Feasibility Studies May 2014 Inner Thames Estuary Feasibility Studies Contents Contents ................................................................................................................................................. ii Acronyms and Abbreviations ............................................................................................................. iii Executive Summary ............................................................................................................................. iv Study 1: Environmental/Natura 2000 impacts ................................................................................. 1-5 1-1 Background........................................................................................................................... 1-5 1-2 The Natura 2000 Legal Tests ............................................................................................... 1-6 1-3 Review of Natura 2000 Habitats and Species Affected ....................................................... 1-8 1-4 Impacts, Issues and Risks to Natura 2000 Features.......................................................... 1-12 1-5 Overall Stability of the Ecosystem ...................................................................................... 1-17 1-6 Case Studies ...................................................................................................................... 1-18 1-7 Compensation..................................................................................................................... 1-26 1-8 Conclusions ........................................................................................................................ 1-35 1-9 Landscape, Historical and Archaeological Impacts ............................................................ 1-36 Study 2: Operational Feasibility and Attitudes to Moving to a New Airport .............................. 2-40 2-1 Operational Feasibility ........................................................................................................ 2-40 2-2 Attitudes to Moving to a New Airport .................................................................................. 2-52 Study 3: Economic and Social Impacts ......................................................................................... 3-54 3-1 Introduction ......................................................................................................................... 3-54 3-2 National Impacts ................................................................................................................. 3-55 3-3 Regional Impacts ................................................................................................................ 3-59 3-4 Local Socio-economic Impacts ........................................................................................... 3-61 3-5 Preliminary Estimates of Impacts ....................................................................................... 3-62 Study 4: Surface Access Impacts ................................................................................................... 4-63 4-1 Introduction ......................................................................................................................... 4-63 4-2 Operations .......................................................................................................................... 4-63 4-3 Costs ................................................................................................................................... 4-76 4-4 Environment........................................................................................................................ 4-80 Study 5: Master Plan ........................................................................................................................ 5-88 5-1 Introduction ......................................................................................................................... 5-88 5-2 Airport Concept and Capacity ............................................................................................. 5-89 5-3 Airside Layout ..................................................................................................................... 5-92 5-4 Terminals ............................................................................................................................ 5-96 5-5 Landside Facilities .............................................................................................................. 5-97 5-6 Cargo and Support Facilities .............................................................................................. 5-98 ii Inner Thames Estuary Feasibility Studies Acronyms and Abbreviations AQMA Air Quality Management Area ATC Air Traffic Control ATM Air Traffic Movement BA British Airways BHS Baggage Handling System CAA Civil Aviation Authority CHaMP Coastal Habitat Management Plan CHP Combined Heat and Power dB Decibels DEFRA Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs DfT Department for Transport EU European Union FDI Foreign Direct Investment GSE Ground Support Equipment HS1 High Speed 1 HS2 High Speed 2 HVDC High Voltage Direct Current ICAO International Civil Aviation Authority IROPI Imperative Reasons of Overriding Public Interest LDA Landing Distance Available LNG Liquefied Natural Gas MARS Multi-Aircraft Ramp System MR Managed Realignment MTOW Maximum Take Off Weight NE Natural England ODN Ordnance Datum Newlyn ODPM Office of the Deputy Prime Minister OLS Obstacle Limitation Surface OMREG Online Managed Realignment database PSZ Public Safety Zone Ramsar Wetlands of international importance designated under the Ramsar Convention RESA Runway Extension Safety Area RET Rapid Exit Taxiway RSPB Royal Society for the Protection of Birds RTE Regulated Tidal Exchange SERAS South East of England Regional Air Services Study SPA Special Protection Area SSSI Site of Special Scientific Interest STP Severn Tidal Power TE2100 Thames Estuary 2100 Plan TfL Transport for London WeBS Wetland Bird Survey iii Inner Thames Estuary Feasibility Studies Executive Summary Thames Hub response, May 2014 – introduction to technical report Foster + Partners is pleased to submit evidence in response to the Airports Commission’s Terms of Reference for the Inner Thames Estuary Feasibility Studies. We have addressed each of the questions raised in the Terms of Reference and, where appropriate, illustrate how they relate to our proposals. We have also taken the opportunity to further develop our technical proposals for the airport to better illustrate what might be achieved on our proposed site. We welcome the Airports Commission’s recognition of the potential that an inner estuary location could bring, both in terms of noise and risk reduction, and the key role it could play in the growth of London and the South East. As time passes, the noise argument becomes ever more compelling and the challenges to accommodating growth more serious. It is essential to develop an airport proposal that is both a credible answer to London’s needs and national economic requirements. The inevitable timescale for any solution means that there is no hope of a short-term fix. For the immediate future, there are only better ways of managing what we have – adding to what we have is a short-term solution and out of step with our wider needs. There has never been a better time to embrace a new airport and to direct its transformative powers to the benefit of the whole country, not just the South East. It is the only credible solution to longer-term capacity needs, both in aviation and economic development. In the time the Airports Commission has been gathering evidence, a new breed of global hubs has started to emerge – we have seen decisions on Beijing South Airport, accelerated investment in Dubai World Central and the award of the concession for New Istanbul. These, and the recent competition for Mexico City International Airport, show how the stature of hub airports has grown and Britain’s relative status will be measured. If Britain is to maintain its status as an aviation hub, we need to measure our capabilities against our true future competitors. This is not a question of vanity, but one of lasting future ability. Hamstringing our capabilities by under-investing in capacity is a decision that will hinder us for generations to come. As we continue to evolve our development capabilities, we look forward to continuing to work with the Commission and very much appreciate the dialogue and meetings so far. Foster + Partners iv SECTION 1 Study 1: Environmental/Natura 2000 impacts Study 1: Environmental/Natura 2000 impacts 1-1 Background Following consultation by the Airports Commission on the proposed terms of reference1 for the Inner Thames Estuary Feasibility Studies this report has been produced as part of the call for evidence. This report considers Study 1 in the Terms of Reference, Environmental/Natura 2000 impacts, which requires a review of the impacts on the Natura 2000 sites of constructing and operating a new airport in the Inner Thames Estuary location, and the feasibility of meeting the legal test for such development. The Thames Estuary and adjacent areas provide habitats for a diverse range of species, including waterbird populations (overwintering, passage and breeding), fish, aquatic mammals and marine invertebrates as well as the intrinsic value of the habitats; however, this report will only provide a response
Load more

Recommended publications
  • ELECTORAL REVIEW of SWALE Final Recommendations for Ward
    SHEET 2, MAP 2 Proposed ward boundaries in the north of the Isle of Sheppey THE LOCAL GOVERNMENT BOUNDARY COMMISSION FOR ENGLAND ELECTORAL REVIEW OF SWALE Final recommendations for ward boundaries in the borough of Swale August 2012 Sheet 2 of 3 This map is based upon Ordnance Survey material with the permission of Ordnance Survey on behalf of the Controller of Her Majesty's Stationery Office © Crown copyright. Unauthorised reproduction infringes Crown copyright and may lead to prosecution or civil proceedings. The Local Government Boundary Commission for England GD100049926 2012. KEY BOROUGH COUNCIL BOUNDARY PROPOSED WARD BOUNDARY PARISH BOUNDARY PROPOSED PARISH WARD BOUNDARY SHEERNESS WARD PROPOSED WARD NAME EASTCHURCH CP PARISH NAME MINSTER EAST PARISH WARD PROPOSED PARISH WARD NAME Sheerness Hole Vehicle and Passenger Garrison Point Ferry Terminal Fort COINCIDENT BOUNDARIES ARE SHOWN AS THIN COLOURED LINES SUPERIMPOSED OVER WIDER ONES. y a w d e M r e v i Boat G R AR Basin RIS ON RO AD Scale : 1cm = 0.07600 km Grid interval 1km Es pla na de Sheerness Harbour Estate EET HIGH STR Sheppey College T Trading Estate B S RI H DG AC E R E OA B IN ROAD D BAS GREAT BLUE Station TOWN HIG H S Y TR WA EE OAD AY T BR E W L Car Park IEL BR Catamaran C e m e Yacht Club t e y r S E s Steel Works T A e P R in E ALMA ST G L M I h P N E g I R u Y L I Playing Field ro SHEERNESS T o S L D R b M E Y D n A A A T O e A N e R V R O O E A u Sheerness Harbour Estate E N R Q IN O R E D d IU n E A A R a M A nt P D M R T i A T L o Sea Cadets R S P S W D T A MARINE
    [Show full text]
  • Wessex and the Reign of Edmund Ii Ironside
    Chapter 16 Wessex and the Reign of Edmund ii Ironside David McDermott Edmund Ironside, the eldest surviving son of Æthelred ii (‘the Unready’), is an often overlooked political figure. This results primarily from the brevity of his reign, which lasted approximately seven months, from 23 April to 30 November 1016. It could also be said that Edmund’s legacy compares unfavourably with those of his forebears. Unlike other Anglo-Saxon Kings of England whose lon- ger reigns and periods of uninterrupted peace gave them opportunities to leg- islate, renovate the currency or reform the Church, Edmund’s brief rule was dominated by the need to quell initial domestic opposition to his rule, and prevent a determined foreign adversary seizing the throne. Edmund conduct- ed his kingship under demanding circumstances and for his resolute, indefati- gable and mostly successful resistance to Cnut, his career deserves to be dis- cussed and his successes acknowledged. Before discussing the importance of Wessex for Edmund Ironside, it is con- structive, at this stage, to clarify what is meant by ‘Wessex’. It is also fitting to use the definition of the region provided by Barbara Yorke. The core shires of Wessex may be reliably regarded as Devon, Somerset, Dorset, Wiltshire, Berk- shire and Hampshire (including the Isle of Wight).1 Following the victory of the West Saxon King Ecgbert at the battle of Ellendun (Wroughton, Wilts.) in 835, the borders of Wessex expanded, with the counties of Kent, Sussex, Surrey and Essex passing from Mercian to West Saxon control.2 Wessex was not the only region with which Edmund was associated, and nor was he the only king from the royal House of Wessex with connections to other regions.
    [Show full text]
  • Shorne Woods Country Park Management Plan 2015-2020
    MANAGEMENT PLAN 2015-2020 KENT COUNTY COUNCIL Shorne Woods Country Park Management Plan 2015-2020 Updated: November 2018 by Tim Bell- Head Ranger 851561 – SHORNE WOODS COUNTRY PARK 1 MANAGEMENT PLAN 2015-2020 KENT COUNTY COUNCIL 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .............................................................................. 5 1.1 BACKGROUND INFORMATION ............................................................. 5 1.2 VISION FOR THE SITE ........................................................................ 6 1.3 CONSERVATION MANAGEMENT .......................................................... 6 1.4 HERITAGE MANAGEMENT .................................................................. 9 1.5 VISITOR MANAGEMENT ....................................................................11 1.6 EDUCATION .....................................................................................12 1.7 SITE MAINTENANCE .........................................................................12 1.8 HEALTH AND SAFETY .......................................................................13 1.9 COMMUNITY INVOLVEMENT ...............................................................15 1.10 FINANCIAL OVERVIEW ......................................................................17 2 BACKGROUND INFORMATION .............................................................. 19 2.1 LOCATION AND SITE DESCRIPTION ....................................................19 2.1.1 Contact Details ...........................................................................19
    [Show full text]
  • Skylarks and Shipping
    1 Skylarks and shipping Sole Street station - Cobham - Shorne Woods - Upper Ifield - Shornemead Fort - Church Street - Higham station Length: 10 miles (16.1km) Useful websites: The walk passes through Ashenbank Underfoot: Mainly field and woodland Wood, Jeskyns country park, Shorne paths on high ground, so only likely to be Woods Country Park. On the Thames bank particularly muddy after poor weather. you pass Shornemead Fort and walk a Marsh sections mainly on surfaced tracks short section of the Saxon Shore Way. or levees, so reasonably dry underfoot. Getting home: Higham is served by two Terrain: With one brief exception in Southeastern trains per hour daily to Shorne Woods, generally very gentle London Bridge (56 mins) and London ascents and descents throughout. Charing Cross (64 mins) via Woolwich Arsenal (33 mins) and Lewisham (46 Maps: 1:50,000 Landranger 178 Thames mins) both for DLR connections. It is also Estuary; 1:25,000 Explorer 163 Gravesend possible to change at Gravesend (8 mins) & Rochester. for high-speed services to London St Pancras via Stratford International. Note, Getting there: Sole Street is served by an however, that connections at Gravesend hourly Southeastern service daily from are poor and there is therefore little time London Victoria (47 mins) via Bromley saving for getting to central London made South for connections from London by using the high-speed route. Blackfriars via Peckham Rye (26 mins). Fares: The cheapest option is to purchase a day return to Rochester, which will cover all the journeys, for £16.10 (£8.05 child, £10.65 railcard). Note that if you wish to return on the high-speed service from Gravesend, you will also need to purchase a supplement (£3.20).
    [Show full text]
  • Ridgeway House Ridgeway | Shorne | DA12 3LW Ridgeway House
    Ridgeway House Ridgeway | Shorne | DA12 3LW Ridgeway House Ridgeway House contains all the pleasing attributes of late Georgian domestic architecture. The façade has the large attractive windows of its period with the addition of two Victorian bays. This impressive frontage attracted the present owners, David and Tanya, who were immediately enchanted by the warm, inviting interior and stunning garden. The house was in need of some care and attention, and it was with great love and scrupulous attention to detail, that they restored the house to its original elegance. The rooms have the space, symmetry and balance of their period which make the house an aesthetically pleasing, comfortable and spacious home; and the perfect venue for large gatherings of family and friends. The family eat in the dining room on a daily basis, and as the house is in an elevated position they can enjoy watching the world go by, through the large bay window. For more formal entertaining it transforms into a stylish setting, where you can experience a sense of how the room must have been in its own time. The house has a bright and positive ambience throughout, and the double aspect in the sitting room make it a particularly pleasant airy room. It is an all year room where the family relax each evening. They fling open the patio doors in the summer, and sit cosily by the open fire in winter. The well equipped kitchen is a busy area where you can enjoy a leisurely chat at the breakfast bar, or take your morning coffee out to the patio.
    [Show full text]
  • P.56. Proposed Progresses: P.68
    County Index of Visits by the Queen. Hosts’ Index: p.56. Proposed Progresses: p.68. Alleged and Traditional Visits: p.101. Mistaken visits: chronological list: p.103-106. County Index of Visits by the Queen. ‘Proposed progresses’: the section following this Index and Hosts’ Index. Other references are to the main Text. Counties are as they were in Elizabeth’s reign, disregarding later changes. (Knighted): knighted during the Queen’s visit. Proposed visits are in italics. Bedfordshire. Bletsoe: 1566 July 17/20: proposed: Oliver 1st Lord St John. 1578: ‘Proposed progresses’ (letter): Lord St John. Dunstable: 1562: ‘Proposed progresses’. At The Red Lion; owned by Edward Wyngate; inn-keeper Richard Amias: 1568 Aug 9-10; 1572 July 28-29. Eaton Socon, at Bushmead: 1566 July 17/20: proposed: William Gery. Holcot: 1575 June 16/17: dinner: Richard Chernock. Houghton Conquest, at Dame Ellensbury Park (royal): 1570 Aug 21/24: dinner, hunt. Luton: 1575 June 15: dinner: George Rotherham. Northill, via: 1566 July 16. Ridgmont, at Segenhoe: visits to Peter Grey. 1570 Aug 21/24: dinner, hunt. 1575 June 16/17: dinner. Toddington: visits to Henry Cheney. 1564 Sept 4-7 (knighted). 1570 Aug 16-25: now Sir Henry Cheney. (Became Lord Cheney in 1572). 1575 June 15-17: now Lord Cheney. Willington: 1566 July 16-20: John Gostwick. Woburn: owned by Francis Russell, 2nd Earl of Bedford. 1568: ‘Proposed progresses’. 1572 July 29-Aug 1. 1 Berkshire. Aldermaston: 1568 Sept 13-14: William Forster; died 1574. 1572: ‘Proposed progresses’. Visits to Humphrey Forster (son); died 1605. 1592 Aug 19-23 (knighted).
    [Show full text]
  • Spring 2006/68
    KE N T ARC H A E O LO G I C A L SO C I E T Y nnIssue numberee 68 wwss ll ee tt tt ee Springr r2006 Inside 2-3 Cuxton Handaxes 4-5 Ice Age Network New Books GGI I A A N N T T HHA A N N D D A A X X E E S S KASWebsites Library Acquisitions 6-7 What’s On 8-9 fromfrom CuxtonCuxton Notice Board 10-11 Ringlemere 2005 SYMBOLIC 12-13 Shorne Heritage Project CAPACITY Letters to the Editor Gravesend Archives COMPATIBLE 14-15 St Mildred’s Tannery WITH 16 Strawberry Wood EXPRESSION Culvert THROUGH LANGUAGE? www.kentarchaeology.org.uk CUXTON GIANT HA N D A X E S Background n August 2006 two small test pits were dug at the Lower Palaeolithic site at Cuxton Rectory. IThe site was first identified in 1889 when, as reported by George Payne (Collectanea Cantiana 1893), “on entering the rectory garden I picked up a fine Palaeolithic flint celt that lay upon the bank”. Further finds within a few yards of the same spot led Payne to conclude that the site rep- resented a Palaeolithic settlement. But it was not until the 1960s that the importance of the site was fully recognised. Tester (1965) re c o v e red an incredible 210 handaxes from three small test pits, as well as numerous cores, flake-tools and waste flakes. The finds came from a thin bed of river gravel close beneath the ground surface at c.17m OD.
    [Show full text]
  • British Royal Ancestry Book 3, Kings of Wessex, from Cerdic, Who Came to Brittany in 495 to Harold II of England, My 27Th Great Grandfather
    GRANHOLM GENEALOGY BRITISH ROYAL ANCESTRY, BOOK 3 Book 3, Kings of Wessex INTRODUCTION The British ancestry is very much a patchwork of various beginnings. Until King Alfred the Great established England various Kings ruled separate parts. In most cases the initial ruler came from the mainland. That time of the history is shrouded in myths, which turn into legends and subsequent into history. Alfred the Great (849-901) was a very learned man and studied all available past history and especially biblical information. He came up with the concept that he was the 72nd generation descendant of Adam and Eve. Moreover he was a 17th generation descendant of Woden (Odin). Proponents of one theory claim that he was the descendant of Noah’s son Sem (Shem) because he claimed to descend from Sceaf, a marooned man who came to Britain on a boat after a flood. See the Biblical Ancestry and Early Mythology Ancestry books). The book British Mythical Royal Ancestry from King Brutus shows the mythical kings including Shakespeare’s King Lair. The lineages are from a common ancestor, Priam King of Troy. His one daughter Troana leads to us via Sceaf, the descendants from his other daughter Creusa lead to the British linage. No attempt has been made to connect these rulers with the historical ones. Before Alfred the Great formed a unified England several Royal Houses ruled the various parts. Not all of them have any clear lineages to the present times, i.e. our ancestors, but some do. I have collected information which show these. These include British Royal Ancestry Book 1, Legendary Kings from Brutus of Troy to including King Leir.
    [Show full text]
  • 5A Planning Applications
    PLANNING APPLICATIONS FOR 2 JANUARY 2008 Page no. 1 MC2007/0014 Peninsula Application for deemed planning permission under Section 90(2) of The Town and Country Planning Act 1990 for construction of two advanced supercritical (ASC) coal-fired generating units (demolition of power station) Kingsnorth Power Station, Kingsnorth, Hoo St. Werburgh, Rochester, Kent 3 2 MC2007/1517 Watling Subdivision of 1,817sqm floor area of existing Retail Warehouse into 2 separate and independent retail units and sale of non DIY goods. B&Q Plc Will Adams Way Gillingham Kent ME8 6BY 7 3 MC2007/1912 Watling Subdivision of 1,817sqm floor area of existing Retail Warehouse into a separate retail unit, provision of mezzanine to provide 1417sqm additional floorspace and sale of non DIY goods B&Q Plc Will Adams Way Gillingham Kent ME8 6BY 76 4 MC2005/0814 Luton & Wayfield Application for approval of reserved matters pursuant to condition 1 of MC2003/1285 for demolition of existing buildings and construction of three blocks of flats comprising of 96 residential units, associated garaging and landscaping 2 Ash Tree Lane Chatham Kent ME5 7BZ 87 5 MC2005/1707 Twydall Retrospective application for the construction of fire escape route and retaining wall Units A to E Invicta Business Centre, land adjoining Beechings Way, Gillingham, Kent. 90 6 MC2007/0265 Rainham Central Construction of a block of lock up garages Land between 21 and 23 Asquith Road Rainham Gillingham Kent 96 7 MC2007/1372 Strood Rural Proposed height increase of 14.3 metre high monopole by 2.5 metres to
    [Show full text]
  • Maidstone Area Archaeological Group, Should Be Sent to Jess Obee (Address at End) Or Payments Made at One of the Meetings
    Maidstone Area Archaeological Group Newsletter, March 2000 Dear Fellow Members As there is a host of announcements, I will hold over the Editorial until the next Newsletter, due in May (sighs of relief all round). David Carder Subscriptions and Membership Cards Subscriptions for the year beginning 1st April 2000 are now due. Please use the renewal form enclosed with this Newsletter, and complete as much as of it as possible - that way we can establish what members' interests really are. Return the form with your cheque by post to Jess Obee (address at end), or hand it with cheque or cash to any Committee Member who will give you a receipt. Renewing members will receive a handy Membership Card with the May Newsletter, giving details of indoor meetings, subscription rates, and contacts. In order to comply with the data protection legislation, we have included on the form a consent that your details may be held on a computer database. This data is held purely for membership administration (e.g. printing of address labels and registration of subscription payments). It will not be used for other purposes, or released to outside parties without your express consent. If you have any queries or concerns over this, please write to the Chairman. Notice of Annual General Meeting - Friday 28th April 2000 This year's AGM will be held at 7.30 pm on Friday 28th April 2000 (not 21st as previously published) at the School Hall, The Street, Detling. The Agenda is as follows : 1. Chairman's welcome 2. Apologies for absence 3.
    [Show full text]
  • Landscape Assessment of Kent 2004
    CHILHAM: STOUR VALLEY Location map: CHILHAMCHARACTER AREA DESCRIPTION North of Bilting, the Stour Valley becomes increasingly enclosed. The rolling sides of the valley support large arable fields in the east, while sweeps of parkland belonging to Godmersham Park and Chilham Castle cover most of the western slopes. On either side of the valley, dense woodland dominate the skyline and a number of substantial shaws and plantations on the lower slopes reflect the importance of game cover in this area. On the valley bottom, the river is picked out in places by waterside alders and occasional willows. The railway line is obscured for much of its length by trees. STOUR VALLEY Chilham lies within the larger character area of the Stour Valley within the Kent Downs AONB. The Great Stour is the most easterly of the three rivers cutting through the Downs. Like the Darent and the Medway, it too provided an early access route into the heart of Kent and formed an ancient focus for settlement. Today the Stour Valley is highly valued for the quality of its landscape, especially by the considerable numbers of walkers who follow the Stour Valley Walk or the North Downs Way National Trail. Despite its proximity to both Canterbury and Ashford, the Stour Valley retains a strong rural identity. Enclosed by steep scarps on both sides, with dense woodlands on the upper slopes, the valley is dominated by intensively farmed arable fields interspersed by broad sweeps of mature parkland. Unusually, there are no electricity pylons cluttering the views across the valley. North of Bilting, the river flows through a narrow, pastoral floodplain, dotted with trees such as willow and alder and drained by small ditches.
    [Show full text]
  • Isle of Sheppey Ffiirrsstt Wwoorrlldd Wwaarr Walking Trails
    Isle of Sheppey FFiirrsstt WWoorrlldd WWaarr Walking Trails RReevveeaalliinngg tthhee hhiissttoorryy ooff llooccaall ppeeooppllee,, ppllaacceess aanndd eevveennttss This trail was developed by Barbara Twiselton and Blue Town Heritage Centre www.kentww1.com ©kentww1.com 2017 Available for use under Creative Commons Licence for non-commercial use only Page 1 of 19 Contents Page 2 Trail information, travel, parking and facilities information and walking advice disclaimer. Page 3 Glossary and Burgundy Trail Introductions Page 4–9 Sheerness Burgundy Trail Page 10 Blue Town Blue Trail Introduction Page 11-15 Blue Town Blue Trail Page 16 Places Nearby Page 17 Quiz Page 18-19 Maps All trails are accessible digitally at www.kentww1 on 100 miles tab, where you will find a link to an app. Travel information By car: Starting point of Burgundy: ME12 1RJ Starting point of Blue: ME12 1RW By Train: Sheerness Railway Station is a point on the Burgundy trail and is close to the start of the trail. Parking: Free parking along High Street Blue Town, Tesco’s car park (ME12 1RH) and Beach Street Car Park (ME12) Places of rest / Facilities: Various cafes and pubs are located around Sheerness town centre and close to the start of the Burgundy Trail. Walking Advice – Health and Safety Some of the locations shown on our maps can be dangerous, particularly coastal areas where the incoming tide may cut off routes, and cliff edges may be prone to collapse. Always check local safety information before travelling, and use caution when visiting. Our maps and points of interest are provided for historical information only.
    [Show full text]