Rough-Legged Buzzards in Britain in the Winter of 1966/67 by R

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Rough-Legged Buzzards in Britain in the Winter of 1966/67 by R Rough-legged Buzzards in Britain in the winter of 1966/67 By R. E. Scoff Dungeness Bird Observatory INTRODUCTION The Handbook of British Birds (1938-41) describes the status of the Rough-legged Buzzard Buteo lagopus In Great Britain as a winter visitor which occurs in most years in the northern isles and on the east coast of Scotland and England as far south as Suffolk, adding that it is rarer in south-east England and especially scarce in the west. It is therefore of some interest that exceptional numbers were reported in the autumn and winter of 1966/67, particularly in the south-east. A request for information was published (Brit, Birds, 60: 139-140) and letters were sent to county and regional recorders and editors asking for their assistance in collecting information relating to the influx. This paper analyses the data received and also presents the results of enquiries about the status of the species in northern Europe in 1966. The Handbook lists eight winters when the Rough-legged Buzzard is known to have been particularly numerous in Britain, intervals between these influxes ranging from five to 19 years with an average of eleven, the last as far back as 1915/16. Since then there have been minor influxes at long intervals (for example, in 1937/38), but the efficiency and number of observers now in contrast to those earlier years make comparison difficult. Certainly there was nothing compar­ able to 1966-67 in the preceding decade, as is shown by the records obtained by Dr. J. T. R, Sharrock (in lift.) as part of a ten-year analysis, covering 1958-67, of the status in Britain and Ireland of this and a number of other regular but scarce visitors. AUTUMN 1966 The first Rough-legged Buzzard to be recorded in Britain in the autumn of 1966 was seen over Ancaster, Lincolnshire, on 1st October. There were then records in Cornwall, Norfolk and Yorkshire during the 6th-8th and others in Huntingdonshire and Northumberland by the nth, in Kent by the 15th and in Pembrokeshire by the 16th. From the 19th onwards they were quite widely distributed, with the main influx in south-east England taking place during the 27th-29th, although by this time considerable numbers were already in the country and it was becoming difficult to distinguish new arrivals from those which had wandered from other areas where they had already been recorded. By the end of October Rough-legged Buzzards had been seen in 20 counties (fig. 1). The bulk of the records were con- 449 BRITISH BIRDS FIG. I. October 1966 (also Scilly, FIG. 2. November 1966 (also Scilly Orkney and Shetland) and Shetland) Rough-legged Buzzards Buteo lagopus in Britain during the winter of 1966/67, the counties involved in the periods shown being marked in black {drawn by P. J. Grant) centrated on the east coast from Northumberland southwards; there •were rather fewer reports from eastern Scotland, although most of the individuals concerned there had appeared slightly earlier than the the main arrivals in England (the first in Shetland on 18th October). Occurrences in Cornwall on 6th October and in Pembrokeshire on the 16th suggested a small arrival in the south-west, as did one in the Isles of Scilly on 28th October, the last coinciding with the main influx in the south-east. Single observations in Staffordshire on 23rd October, in Wiltshire on the 28th and in Worcestershire on the 29th possibly lelated to individuals which were moving on after reaching Britain earlier in the month. There was a clear reduction in the number of counties which lecorded Rough-legged Buzzards in November (fig. 2) and many of the birds which subsequendy wintered had already settled down by the beginning of that month. It is probable that little or no further immigration took place during November (although it would have been impossible to distinguish a small arrival in the south-east) and, apart from those in Shetland and Angus/Kincardine, the birds in east coast counties were confined to die area south of the Humber. Never- 450 ROUGH-LEGGED BUZZARDS IN WINTER 1966/67 FIG. 3. December-February (also FIG. 4. True wintering birds (also Shetland) Shetland) Rough-legged Buzzards Buteo lagopus in Britain during the winter of 1966/67, the counties involved in the periods shown being marked in black {drawn by P. J. Grant) theless, some movement westwards in this month was shown by records in Staffordshire, Lancashire and Anglesey. WINTER 1966/67 Fig. 3 shows the counties in which Rough-legged Buzzards were recorded during the winter months from December to February, regardless of whether they stayed for any length of time. Fig. 4, on the other hand, is confined to individuals that remained in one area throughout these months, or at least for periods of over four weeks. It will be noted that the casual records in fig. 3 extended the winter area only slightly west and south. The minimum number of Rough- legged Buzzards which actually wintered was 5 7, as follows: Wiltshire 1 Oxford/Buckingham 1 Huntingdonshire 3 Hampshire 1 Suffolk 14 Angus/Kincardine 2 Sussex 4 Norfolk 11 Ross 1 Kent 12 Cambridgeshire 1 Shetland 6 The records also suggest at least a further ten, as follows: Somerset 1 Dorset 1 Shropshire 1 Midlothian 1 Wiltshire 3 Essex 2 Lincolnshire 1 451 BRITISH BIRDS Thus we have a likely minimum of 67 individuals present throughout the winter, but even this may be well below the true figure as observations from Scottish, Welsh and western counties of England are possibly not complete. It will be noted that the great majority of the wintering birds were in Suffolk, Kent and Norfolk, these three counties between them accounting for 37 of the records. Of these 37, over half were in the Brecks and on the Suffolk coast between Orford and Benacre, five being seen together at Walberswick on several occasions. Six more were on the Isle of Sheppey, Kent, while the remainder in these counties favoured similar habitats in Romney Marsh, the east and north Kent marshes, the Broads, the north Norfolk coast and the Wash. SPRING 1967 It is very difficult to distinguish records relating to a return passage in spring as many of the Rough-legged Buzzards which wintered remained until late March or even early April. Figs. 5 and 6 show the counties which recorded these birds in March and April. It appears that they departed first from the central and southern counties, known winterers last being seen in Hampshire on 26th February, in Oxford/Buckingham FIG. 5. March 1967 (also Shetland) FIG. 6. April 1967 (also Shetland) Rough-legged Buzzards Buteo lagopus in Britain during the -winter of 1966/67, the counties involved in the periods shown being marked in black {drawn by P. J. Grant) 452 ROUGH-LEGGED BUZZARDS IN WINTER 1966/67 on 15th March, in Wiltshire on 19th March and in Sussex on 28th March. They had left Huntingdonshire by early April, but were still being recorded regularly in Kent, Suffolk and Norfolk in the second half of that month. Two in Somerset on 4th April and one in Dunbarton on the 22nd may possibly have been on passage or equally may have been previously overlooked winterers which were starting to wander over greater areas. The following records seem likely to have referred to spring passage: Pegsdon, Bedfordshire, I2th-24th March Dunbarton, 22nd April Ruabon, Denbighshire, 17th March Cley, Norfolk, 24th April Spurn, Yorkshire, 2nd-30th April Unst, Shetland, 9th May Wellington, Somerset, 4th April (two) Wareham, Dorset, nth and 13th May Dungeness, Kent, 13th April (two) Haldon, Devon, 28th-2C)th May EUROPEAN BREEDING POPULATIONS 1966 All the data obtained on the comparative size and breeding success of Rough-legged Buzzard populations in 1966 came from northern Fenno-Scandia. Olavi Hilden (in litt.) provided information from five areas of Finland. (1) At Karigasniemi the population was very small and obviously to a great extent non-breeding; during June and July soaring birds were seen only twice, whereas in peak years one expects to see them every day. (2) At Kevo the population was low; two of three young disappeared from the one nest found. (3) At Kilpisjarvi the population was almost nil; in early July only one bird was observed in an area where four or five pairs normally breed. (4) In western Lapland and northern Norway not a single Rough-legged Buzzard was seen during a car journey in mid-June, whereas in normal years numbers are recorded on this route. (5) By way of contrast, at Kittila, further south in Lapland, the population was high and breeding success fairly good. At Karigasniemi, Kevo and Kilpisjarvi it was also noted that there was an almost complete lack of small mammals and this was considered to be the reason for the absence of the predators from these and other areas. A similar picture emerged from Finnmark where Rodney Gayer (in litt.) recorded only one breeding pair in the entire area of Porsan- gerfjord (with another pair in Varangerfjord); apparently no young were reared there. In 1965, by comparison, Rough-legged Buzzards were described as 'abundant' in this part with a pair inhabiting almost every suitable hillock, and in 1967 some twelve pairs were nesting in a 40-mile length of the western shore of Porsangerfjord. Further, the rodent population had reached a peak in this part of Finnmark in 1965 and then collapsed, with the result that there was an almost total lack of small mammal activity. As in Finland, it appeared that predators were more abundant further south in Norway, this being illustrated by the commonness of Long-tailed Skuas Stercorarius longicaudus near Sulitjelma at latitude 6y°N.
Recommended publications
  • ELECTORAL REVIEW of SWALE Final Recommendations for Ward
    SHEET 2, MAP 2 Proposed ward boundaries in the north of the Isle of Sheppey THE LOCAL GOVERNMENT BOUNDARY COMMISSION FOR ENGLAND ELECTORAL REVIEW OF SWALE Final recommendations for ward boundaries in the borough of Swale August 2012 Sheet 2 of 3 This map is based upon Ordnance Survey material with the permission of Ordnance Survey on behalf of the Controller of Her Majesty's Stationery Office © Crown copyright. Unauthorised reproduction infringes Crown copyright and may lead to prosecution or civil proceedings. The Local Government Boundary Commission for England GD100049926 2012. KEY BOROUGH COUNCIL BOUNDARY PROPOSED WARD BOUNDARY PARISH BOUNDARY PROPOSED PARISH WARD BOUNDARY SHEERNESS WARD PROPOSED WARD NAME EASTCHURCH CP PARISH NAME MINSTER EAST PARISH WARD PROPOSED PARISH WARD NAME Sheerness Hole Vehicle and Passenger Garrison Point Ferry Terminal Fort COINCIDENT BOUNDARIES ARE SHOWN AS THIN COLOURED LINES SUPERIMPOSED OVER WIDER ONES. y a w d e M r e v i Boat G R AR Basin RIS ON RO AD Scale : 1cm = 0.07600 km Grid interval 1km Es pla na de Sheerness Harbour Estate EET HIGH STR Sheppey College T Trading Estate B S RI H DG AC E R E OA B IN ROAD D BAS GREAT BLUE Station TOWN HIG H S Y TR WA EE OAD AY T BR E W L Car Park IEL BR Catamaran C e m e Yacht Club t e y r S E s Steel Works T A e P R in E ALMA ST G L M I h P N E g I R u Y L I Playing Field ro SHEERNESS T o S L D R b M E Y D n A A A T O e A N e R V R O O E A u Sheerness Harbour Estate E N R Q IN O R E D d IU n E A A R a M A nt P D M R T i A T L o Sea Cadets R S P S W D T A MARINE
    [Show full text]
  • Wessex and the Reign of Edmund Ii Ironside
    Chapter 16 Wessex and the Reign of Edmund ii Ironside David McDermott Edmund Ironside, the eldest surviving son of Æthelred ii (‘the Unready’), is an often overlooked political figure. This results primarily from the brevity of his reign, which lasted approximately seven months, from 23 April to 30 November 1016. It could also be said that Edmund’s legacy compares unfavourably with those of his forebears. Unlike other Anglo-Saxon Kings of England whose lon- ger reigns and periods of uninterrupted peace gave them opportunities to leg- islate, renovate the currency or reform the Church, Edmund’s brief rule was dominated by the need to quell initial domestic opposition to his rule, and prevent a determined foreign adversary seizing the throne. Edmund conduct- ed his kingship under demanding circumstances and for his resolute, indefati- gable and mostly successful resistance to Cnut, his career deserves to be dis- cussed and his successes acknowledged. Before discussing the importance of Wessex for Edmund Ironside, it is con- structive, at this stage, to clarify what is meant by ‘Wessex’. It is also fitting to use the definition of the region provided by Barbara Yorke. The core shires of Wessex may be reliably regarded as Devon, Somerset, Dorset, Wiltshire, Berk- shire and Hampshire (including the Isle of Wight).1 Following the victory of the West Saxon King Ecgbert at the battle of Ellendun (Wroughton, Wilts.) in 835, the borders of Wessex expanded, with the counties of Kent, Sussex, Surrey and Essex passing from Mercian to West Saxon control.2 Wessex was not the only region with which Edmund was associated, and nor was he the only king from the royal House of Wessex with connections to other regions.
    [Show full text]
  • P.56. Proposed Progresses: P.68
    County Index of Visits by the Queen. Hosts’ Index: p.56. Proposed Progresses: p.68. Alleged and Traditional Visits: p.101. Mistaken visits: chronological list: p.103-106. County Index of Visits by the Queen. ‘Proposed progresses’: the section following this Index and Hosts’ Index. Other references are to the main Text. Counties are as they were in Elizabeth’s reign, disregarding later changes. (Knighted): knighted during the Queen’s visit. Proposed visits are in italics. Bedfordshire. Bletsoe: 1566 July 17/20: proposed: Oliver 1st Lord St John. 1578: ‘Proposed progresses’ (letter): Lord St John. Dunstable: 1562: ‘Proposed progresses’. At The Red Lion; owned by Edward Wyngate; inn-keeper Richard Amias: 1568 Aug 9-10; 1572 July 28-29. Eaton Socon, at Bushmead: 1566 July 17/20: proposed: William Gery. Holcot: 1575 June 16/17: dinner: Richard Chernock. Houghton Conquest, at Dame Ellensbury Park (royal): 1570 Aug 21/24: dinner, hunt. Luton: 1575 June 15: dinner: George Rotherham. Northill, via: 1566 July 16. Ridgmont, at Segenhoe: visits to Peter Grey. 1570 Aug 21/24: dinner, hunt. 1575 June 16/17: dinner. Toddington: visits to Henry Cheney. 1564 Sept 4-7 (knighted). 1570 Aug 16-25: now Sir Henry Cheney. (Became Lord Cheney in 1572). 1575 June 15-17: now Lord Cheney. Willington: 1566 July 16-20: John Gostwick. Woburn: owned by Francis Russell, 2nd Earl of Bedford. 1568: ‘Proposed progresses’. 1572 July 29-Aug 1. 1 Berkshire. Aldermaston: 1568 Sept 13-14: William Forster; died 1574. 1572: ‘Proposed progresses’. Visits to Humphrey Forster (son); died 1605. 1592 Aug 19-23 (knighted).
    [Show full text]
  • British Royal Ancestry Book 3, Kings of Wessex, from Cerdic, Who Came to Brittany in 495 to Harold II of England, My 27Th Great Grandfather
    GRANHOLM GENEALOGY BRITISH ROYAL ANCESTRY, BOOK 3 Book 3, Kings of Wessex INTRODUCTION The British ancestry is very much a patchwork of various beginnings. Until King Alfred the Great established England various Kings ruled separate parts. In most cases the initial ruler came from the mainland. That time of the history is shrouded in myths, which turn into legends and subsequent into history. Alfred the Great (849-901) was a very learned man and studied all available past history and especially biblical information. He came up with the concept that he was the 72nd generation descendant of Adam and Eve. Moreover he was a 17th generation descendant of Woden (Odin). Proponents of one theory claim that he was the descendant of Noah’s son Sem (Shem) because he claimed to descend from Sceaf, a marooned man who came to Britain on a boat after a flood. See the Biblical Ancestry and Early Mythology Ancestry books). The book British Mythical Royal Ancestry from King Brutus shows the mythical kings including Shakespeare’s King Lair. The lineages are from a common ancestor, Priam King of Troy. His one daughter Troana leads to us via Sceaf, the descendants from his other daughter Creusa lead to the British linage. No attempt has been made to connect these rulers with the historical ones. Before Alfred the Great formed a unified England several Royal Houses ruled the various parts. Not all of them have any clear lineages to the present times, i.e. our ancestors, but some do. I have collected information which show these. These include British Royal Ancestry Book 1, Legendary Kings from Brutus of Troy to including King Leir.
    [Show full text]
  • Isle of Sheppey Ffiirrsstt Wwoorrlldd Wwaarr Walking Trails
    Isle of Sheppey FFiirrsstt WWoorrlldd WWaarr Walking Trails RReevveeaalliinngg tthhee hhiissttoorryy ooff llooccaall ppeeooppllee,, ppllaacceess aanndd eevveennttss This trail was developed by Barbara Twiselton and Blue Town Heritage Centre www.kentww1.com ©kentww1.com 2017 Available for use under Creative Commons Licence for non-commercial use only Page 1 of 19 Contents Page 2 Trail information, travel, parking and facilities information and walking advice disclaimer. Page 3 Glossary and Burgundy Trail Introductions Page 4–9 Sheerness Burgundy Trail Page 10 Blue Town Blue Trail Introduction Page 11-15 Blue Town Blue Trail Page 16 Places Nearby Page 17 Quiz Page 18-19 Maps All trails are accessible digitally at www.kentww1 on 100 miles tab, where you will find a link to an app. Travel information By car: Starting point of Burgundy: ME12 1RJ Starting point of Blue: ME12 1RW By Train: Sheerness Railway Station is a point on the Burgundy trail and is close to the start of the trail. Parking: Free parking along High Street Blue Town, Tesco’s car park (ME12 1RH) and Beach Street Car Park (ME12) Places of rest / Facilities: Various cafes and pubs are located around Sheerness town centre and close to the start of the Burgundy Trail. Walking Advice – Health and Safety Some of the locations shown on our maps can be dangerous, particularly coastal areas where the incoming tide may cut off routes, and cliff edges may be prone to collapse. Always check local safety information before travelling, and use caution when visiting. Our maps and points of interest are provided for historical information only.
    [Show full text]
  • Alfred the West Saxon, King of English
    Cornell University Library The original of tliis book is in tine Cornell University Library. There are no known copyright restrictions in the United States on the use of the text. http://www.archive.org/details/cu31924027953888 /S3 BOUGHT WITH THB«INC FROM th:^ SAGE ENDOWMENT the; gift o^ Benrg HI. %nt 1891 Saintly %ivc8 Edited by R. F. Horton, M.A. Alfred the West Saxon King of the English Frontispiece^. The Traditional Portrait of Alfred the Great. This conception of Alfred's features is probably at least 200 years old. It appears in one of the Bodlean prints with this legend: Alfredus Saxonuvt Rex, Coll. Universitatis Oxon. Fvndalvr. Ciica A. Chr. 877. Hujus Suinmi Regis ^Efigiem a Taiula in Btbl. Bodkiana /ulUuii Reverendo viro Nathan Wciiwri'll, S.T-R. Nathan Wetherell was Master of University :from 1764-1808, but the original to which he refers cannot be traced. Alfred the West Saxon King of the EngHsh DUGALD MACFADYEN, M.A. (J^ametime ExM^itioner in Modem History on ihs Foundation of Merton Colleg4, Ox/orS} WITH PORTRAIT AND OTHER ILLUSTRATIONS 1901 LONDON: J. M. DENT & CO. NEW YORK : E. P. DUTTON & CO. M ; The Author's Apology This book was undertaken at the request of a friend who found himself prevented under doctor's orders from preparing a Life of King Alfred for this series in time for the millenary celebration of his reign. Though undertaken to oblige someone else, it has been finished to please myself, and to gratify my reverence and liking for the hero of the book.
    [Show full text]
  • The Winter Camp of the Viking Great Army, Ad 872–3, Torksey, Lincolnshire
    The Antiquaries Journal, 96, 2016, pp 23–67 © The Society of Antiquaries of London, 2016 doi:10.1017⁄s0003581516000718 THE WINTER CAMP OF THE VIKING GREAT ARMY, AD 872–3, TORKSEY, LINCOLNSHIRE Dawn M Hadley, FSA, and Julian D Richards, FSA, with contributions by Hannah Brown, Elizabeth Craig-Atkins, Diana Mahoney-Swales, Gareth Perry, Samantha Stein and Andrew Woods Dawn M Hadley, Department of Archaeology, University of Sheffield, Northgate House, West Street, Sheffield S14ET, UK. Email: d.m.hadley@sheffield.ac.uk Julian D Richards, Department of Archaeology, University of York, The King’s Manor, York YO17EP, UK. Email: [email protected] This paper presents the results of a multidisciplinary project that has revealed the location, extent and character of the winter camp of the Viking Great Army at Torksey, Lincolnshire, of AD 872–3. The camp lay within a naturally defended area of higher ground, partially surrounded by marshes and bordered by the River Trent on its western side. It is considerably larger than the Viking camp of 873–4 previously excavated at Repton, Derbyshire, and lacks the earthwork defences identified there. Several thousand individuals overwintered in the camp, including warriors, craftworkers and merchants. An exceptionally large and rich metalwork assemblage was deposited during the Great Army’s overwintering, and metal processing and trading was undertaken. There is no evidence for a pre-existing Anglo-Saxon trading site here; the site appears to have been chosen for its strategic location and its access to resources. In the wake of the overwintering, Torksey developed as an important Anglo-Saxon borough with a major wheel-thrown pottery industry and multiple churches and cemeteries.
    [Show full text]
  • Family Group Sheet for Cnut the Great
    Family Group Sheet for Cnut the Great Husband: Cnut the Great Birth: Bet. 985 AD–995 AD in Denmark Death: 12 Nov 1035 in England (Shaftesbury, Dorset) Burial: Old Minster, Winchester. Bones now in Winchester Cathedral Father: King Sweyn I Forkbeard Mother: Wife: Emma of Normandy Birth: 985 AD Death: 06 Mar 1052 in Winchester, Hampshire Father: Richard I Duke of Normandy Mother: Gunnor de Crepon Children: 1 Name: Gunhilda of Denmark F Birth: 1020 Death: 18 Jul 1038 Spouse: Henry III 2 Name: Knud III Hardeknud M Birth: 1020 in England Death: 08 Jun 1042 in England Burial: Winchester Cathedral, Winchester, England Notes Cnut the Great Cnut the Great From Wikipedia, (Redirected from Canute the Great) Cnut the Great King of all the English, and of Denmark, of the Norwegians, and part of the Swedes King of Denmark Reign1018-1035 PredecessorHarald II SuccessorHarthacnut King of all England Reign1016-1035 PredecessorEdmund Ironside SuccessorHarold Harefoot King of Norway Reign1028-1035 PredecessorOlaf Haraldsson SuccessorMagnus Olafsson SpouseÆlfgifu of Northampton Emma of Normandy Issue Sweyn Knutsson Harold Harefoot Harthacnut Gunhilda of Denmark FatherSweyn Forkbeard MotherSigrid the Haughty also known as Gunnhilda Bornc. 985 - c. 995 Denmark Died12 November 1035 England (Shaftesbury, Dorset) BurialOld Minster, Winchester. Bones now in Winchester Cathedral Cnut the Great, also known as Canute or Knut (Old Norse: Knútr inn ríki[1] (c. 985 or 995 - 12 November 1035) was a Viking king of England and Denmark, Norway, and parts of Sweden, whose successes as a statesman, politically and militarily, prove him to be one of the greatest figures of medieval Europe and yet at the end of the historically foggy Dark Ages, with an era of chivalry and romance on the horizon in feudal Europe and the events of 1066 in England, these were largely 'lost to history'.
    [Show full text]
  • North Sheppey Erosion Study Volume 1: Coastal
    NORTH SHEPPEY EROSION STUDY VOLUME 1: COASTAL ADAPTATION STUDY Client: Consultant: Swale Borough Council Engineering Services Swale House, Canterbury City Council East Street, Military Road Sittingbourne, Canterbury, ME10 3HT CT1 1YW OCTOBER 2011 Canterbury City Council Engineering Services 0 LIST OF CONTENTS Page VOLUME 1: COASTAL ADAPTATION STUDY Executive Summary 3 1. Background 4 2. Description of site 6 3. Higher level plans 25 4. Historical and Coastal Evolution 31 5. Geology and Morphology 34 6. Aerial photography 36 7. Lidar Airborne laser scanning 37 8. Historic Ordnance Survey Records 39 9. Parameters 40 10. Management of Coastal Erosion Options 50 11. Do Nothing Scenario 62 12. Economic Appraisal 65 13. Environmental Assessment 67 14. Monitoring and Public Warning 69 15. Consultation 71 16. Recommendations and Implementation 72 References 75 List of Photographs Photo 1- The Leas looking west 7 Photo 2- East End of Minster 11 Photo 3- Minster cliffs and sea defences looking west 14 Photo 4- Fly tipping near Royal Oak Point, cliffs highly vegetated. 15 Photo 5- View from Redcot Caravan Park looking across to Lazy Days park 16 Photo 6- Redcot caravan park 16 Photo 7- Looking West from Ashcroft caravan park 17 Photo 8- Barrows Brook 18 Photo 9- Recent mud run at Ashcroft caravan park 19 Photo 10-Warden Point west of Warden Springs 20 Photo 11- Looking east towards Warden Point 20 Photo 12- Rock armour at Warden Bay revetment looking west 23 Photo 13- Rear scarp of recent slide Cliff Drive, Warden Bay 23 Photo 14- Land slide at Warden Point November 1971 43 Photo 15- Cliff warning sign 70 List of Tables 35 Table 1- Geological Details Table 2- Average Future Erosion for England and Wales 41 Table 3- Historic and predicted future erosion rates 42 Table 4- Recorded land slide history 44 Table 5- Relative sea level rise from UKCP09 47 Table 6- Recommended contingency allowances for net sea level rise PPS25 48 Table 7- Property adaptation, financial options 61 Table 8- Summary of impacts resulting from a do nothing scenario.
    [Show full text]
  • Trenches in England Gazetteer Issue-01 Formatted.Xlsx
    Site Name Parish/District County NGR Description Condition References Mapping & AP Comments WWII Comments Designation Associated Files Source Aps EC Curwen air photo of practice trenches in Barbican House, Levelled by plough and some areas of scrub but Lewes. Assocacited with visible on AP and should survive. Appears to Thundersbarrow Hill Shoreham by Sea East Sussex TQ 2250 0850 Shoreham Camp overlie earlier Celtic field system on Google Earth Chasseaud 2014: Fig 2 NMP Plot + Kitchener's Camps at Seaford: A Trenches associated with First World War Landscape on Aerial Seaford Camp Seaford Head East Sussex TV 4992 9830 Kitchener Army camp. Extant, though overgrown on Google Earth Skinner 2011, pg 28 Photographs by Skinner EH Report 27/2011 Practice trenches on the side of the neck and on top of the neck Appear to be extant. Likely to be associated with Alfriston Alfriston East Sussex TQ 50918 03129 of the valley. Canadian Infantry Chasseaud 2014, pg 173 & Fig 9 Appear to be extant although some areas Chailey Common Chailey East Sussex TQ 374 208 Maze of practice trenches. overgrown. Chasseaud 2014, pg 175 & Fig 9 Practice trenches shown on aerial Exceat Exceat East Sussex TV 533 982 photographs. Not visible. Chasseaud 2014, pg 176 & Fig 9 Practice trenches shown on aerial Polegate Polegate East Sussex TQ 608 047 photographs. Not visible. Chasseaud 2014, pg 180 & Fig 9 Practice trenches including a Appear to be extant although difficult to discern Poundgate, extensive trench system on between archaeological features and trackways Ashdown Forset Poundgate East Sussex TQ 48804 29028 Poundgate Spur.
    [Show full text]
  • The Stratigraphical Framework for the Palaeogene Successions of the London Basin, UK
    The stratigraphical framework for the Palaeogene successions of the London Basin, UK Open Report OR/12/004 BRITISH GEOLOGICAL SURVEY OPEN REPORT OR/12/004 The National Grid and other Ordnance Survey data are used The stratigraphical framework for with the permission of the Controller of Her Majesty’s Stationery Office. the Palaeogene successions of the Licence No: 100017897/2012. London Basin, UK Key words Stratigraphy; Palaeogene; southern England; London Basin; Montrose Group; Lambeth Group; Thames Group; D T Aldiss Bracklesham Group. Front cover Borehole core from Borehole 404T, Jubilee Line Extension, showing pedogenically altered clays of the Lower Mottled Clay of the Reading Formation and glauconitic sands of the Upnor Formation. The white bands are calcrete, which form hard bands in this part of the Lambeth Group (Section 3.2.2.2 of this report) BGS image P581688 Bibliographical reference ALDISS, D T. 2012. The stratigraphical framework for the Palaeogene successions of the London Basin, UK. British Geological Survey Open Report, OR/12/004. 94pp. Copyright in materials derived from the British Geological Survey’s work is owned by the Natural Environment Research Council (NERC) and/or the authority that commissioned the work. You may not copy or adapt this publication without first obtaining permission. Contact the BGS Intellectual Property Rights Section, British Geological Survey, Keyworth, e-mail [email protected]. You may quote extracts of a reasonable length without prior permission, provided a full acknowledgement is given of the source of the extract. Maps and diagrams in this book use topography based on Ordnance Survey mapping. © NERC 2012.
    [Show full text]
  • The Isle of Sheppey Brochure.Pdf
    Sheerness Dockyard Sheerness Elmley Bird Reserve Bird Elmley i Towns & Villages of Sheppey of Villages & Towns Your Guide to the to Guide Your www.rspb.org.uk/reserves call 01795 665969/01634 222480 or log on to the website: the to on log or 222480 665969/01634 01795 call members. Parking and toilets are available. For more information more For available. are toilets and Parking members. RSPB members are free but there is a small charge for non for charge small a is there but free are members RSPB distance from the bus and train stations train and bus the from distance worth a visit. a worth paddling pool are situated by the beach and within easy walking easy within and beach the by situated are pool paddling birds of prey and aquatic plants, plus much more and certainly and more much plus plants, aquatic and prey of birds companies. The leisure centre and swimming pool, sand pit and pit sand pool, swimming and centre leisure The companies. inhabited by many breeding wetland birds, marsh frogs, insects, frogs, marsh birds, wetland breeding many by inhabited The High Street has may local shops as well as several national several as well as shops local may has Street High The Marshes! The RSPB Reserve has windswept salt marshes that are that marshes salt windswept has Reserve RSPB The Marshes! wilderness left in the south east, come and have a look at Elmley at look a have and come east, south the in left wilderness blow to the town. the to blow Harvest and Flower festival.
    [Show full text]