DOCSLIB.ORG

Variations in the Catch Success of Channel Catfish and Carp in Baited Hoop Nets

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Variations in the Catch Success of Channel Catfish and Carp in Baited Hoop Nets View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by University of Northern Iowa Proceedings of the Iowa Academy of Science Volume 80 Number Article 7 1973 Variations in the Catch Success of Channel Catfish and Carp in Baited Hoop Nets James Mayhew Chariton Research Station, Red Haw State Park Copyright ©1973 Iowa Academy of Science, Inc. Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.uni.edu/pias Recommended Citation Mayhew, James (1973) "Variations in the Catch Success of Channel Catfish and Carp in Baited Hoop Nets," Proceedings of the Iowa Academy of Science, 80(3), 136-139. Available at: https://scholarworks.uni.edu/pias/vol80/iss3/7 This Research is brought to you for free and open access by the Iowa Academy of Science at UNI ScholarWorks. It has been accepted for inclusion in Proceedings of the Iowa Academy of Science by an authorized editor of UNI ScholarWorks. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Mayhew: Variations in the Catch Success of Channel Catfish and Carp in Ba Variations in the Catch Success of Channel Catfish and Carp in Baited Hoop Nets1 JAMES MAYHEW2 MAYHEW, JAMES. (Chariton Research Station, Red Haw State soybean cake the increase was not statistically significant. There Park, Route 1, Chariton, Iowa 50049.) Variations in the Catch were significant differences in the catch success of channel catfish Success of Channel Catfish and Carp in Baited Hoop Nets. Proc. among netting sites and among locations of nets within each site. Iowa Acad. Sci. 80( 3) 136-139, 1973. Most of this variation was attributed to the chumming power of SYNOPSIS: Baits were tested for their ability to attract channel cheese bait. Carp were attracted in significantly higher numbers to catfish and carp into hoop nets. Treatments tested were cheese nets containing soybean bait, while cheese bait had little attraction. alone, soybean cake alone, cheese and soybean cake combined, Variation in the monthly mean catch success of carp was highly and an unbaited control. A 4 x 4 Latin Square design was used for significant. the experiment. The factors which influence catch success were INDEX DESCRIPTORS: Commercial fish bait, catfish, carp, catch assessed by the analysis of variance. Cheese bait was best for in­ success. creasing the catch success of channel catfish; in nets containing Various bait preparations are used to attract channel cat­ fish and carp into hoop nets. Two of the most commonly DAY used commercial baits are unmarketable cheese from clip­ ping during processing and soybean cake, a by-product of M T W T soybean oil extraction which is frequently used in domestic livestock food. Both baits work by slowly permeating into the stream current and chumming fish from downstream. Fish 1 A B c D follow the bait scent to its source and are captured. Observations of net lifts indicated considerable variation in the catch success and selectivity of fish species when nets I- 2 B c D A were baited with these products. Since baits were usually w combined at each set it was difficult to ascertain differences z in bait preferences by fish, but usually when a single bait D A B was used there was greater species selectivity depending pri­ 3 c marily on the product. 4 D A B c METHODS AND ANALYTICAL PROCEDURE where, A represented soybean cake, B represented cheese, C The experimental procedure was designed so the unique represented soybean plus cheese, and D represented unbaited effects of different bait treatment could be separated while control nets. These treatment combinations represent the fac­ accounting for variations in catch due to uncontrolled fac­ torial combination of two factors, soybean and cheese. A tors. Two netting sites were selected near the upper head­ randomized baiting regime was achieved by changing one waters of Red Rock Reservoir in a portion of the Des Moines column in the Latin Square at the start of each replication. River where extensive pre-impoundment netting studies were The daily baiting schedule started Monday A.M. and conducted. These sites were approximately 4-km apart in continued through Thursday P.M. Captured fish were enum­ similar stream habitat, and were designated sites 1 and 2. erated by species and released from a common point. Nets Four hoop nets with 61 cm circular frames and 3.8 cm stretch were carefully emptied of remaining bait before they were measure nylon web were set at each site. Nets were located rebaited with the next scheduled treatment. at intervals ranging from 48 to 114 m along the stream with­ Previous hoop netting (Mayhew and Mitzner, 1969) indi­ in each site and numbered consecutively from 1 through 4 cated seasonal variation in the catch of channel catfish. Most from the upstream location. Maximum length of the series of the variation was related to intensified movement associ­ was about 230 m. Nets were kept in the same location ated with spawning during the June-July period and unex­ throughout the experiment. plained accelerated movement in early autumn. Hoop nets Bait treatment was scheduled according to a random 4 x 4 are stationary self-entrapping gear, and periodic irregularity Latin Square commencing with the sequence in movement patterns of fish is usually reflected in catch success. Variations attributable to seasonal activity were mea­ sured by replicating each square at monthly intervals in June, July, August and September. 1 Funds for this study were partially provided by Project 4-11-R, Commercial Food Fish Investigations, National Marine Fisheries The actual catch counts ( X) were transformed to Service, NOAA and Iowa Conservation Commission cooperating. 2 Supervisor of Fish Research, Chariton Research Station, Red Haw State Park, Route 1, Chariton, Iowa 50049. X'= Jx + 1/2 Published by UNI ScholarWorks, 1973 1 Proceedings of the Iowa Academy of Science, Vol. 80 [1973], No. 3, Art. 7 VARIATIONS IN CATCH SUCCESS OF FISH 137 before the analyses were made to achieve more uniform TABLE 1. CATCH SuccEss OF CHANNEL CATFISH IN Hoop variance in the residuals. Examination of the empirical cum­ NETS CONTAINING VARIOUS BAIT COMBINATIONS. ALL ulative distribution of residuals by probability plotting indi­ VALUES ARE FISH PER NET DAY. cated normality was a reasonable assumption. Site Month Treatment 1 2 Means June A 11.0 3.5 7.3 B 32.3 38.3 35.3 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION c 20.3 3.8 12.1 D 22.0 1.8 1.9 Means 21.4 11.9 14.2 Overall catch success of channel catfish in the hoop nets July A 3.5 32.8 18.0 ranged from 0.3 to 143.8 fish per net day ( FND) with a B 21.5 93.8 57.7 mean of 31.8 FND (Table 1). Treatments containing cheese c 32.3 141.8 87.1 had a profound effect up:m catches of channel catfish (Fig­ D 0.3 2.0 1.2 ure 1). In the nets containing cheese alone mean catch sue- Means 14.4 67.6 41.0 August A 11.0 45.0 28.4 B 8.0 126.0 67.0 c 18.0 143.8 80.9 D 4.5 0.5 2.5 65 Means 10.4 78.8 44.7 (58.7) September A 22.5 .5.3 13.9 GO B 57.0 9.3 33.2 (5~·=8~)-----~=--------· c 57.0 52.5 54.8 55 D 2.0 13.0 7.5 ~CHEESE Means 34.6 20.0 27.4 50 Overall 0 Means 20.2 44.6 31.8 z 45 LL z 40 different between monthly replicates ( P < .25). Means for the replicates were 14.9 FND in June, 40.9 FND in July, V> 35 44.7 FND in August and 35.8 FND in September. These V> w values approximate those reported in netting studies by May­ u u 30 hew and Mitzner ( 1969), but monthly distribution of the :'.) catch was quite different. In the previous investigation high­ V> 25 est catch success was reported in June followed by a precipi­ I tous decline in July and an increase during late August to a u 20 I- (16°9) secondary mode by mid-September with a decline later in au­ <{ tumn. Highly significant (P < .01) F-ratios were also ob­ u 15 • tained from the site x month interaction. 10 TABLE 2. ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE IN MEAN CATCH SuccEss ( 3. 3) 5 • OF CHANNEL CATFISH. DATA ARE TRANSFORMED BY Jx + 112. NO SOYBEAN SOYBEAN Source of variation df SS MS LEVEL .OF SOYBEAN Squares (7) 383.3 Sites 1 59.7 59.7" Months 3 68.1 22.7 Figure 1. Treatment means for catch success of channel catfish. Sites x months 3 255.5 85.2"" Locations within squares 24 538.9 22.5" Days within squares 24 259.9 10.8 Treatments ( 3) 367.1 Soybean 1 30.7 30.7 cess was 56.8 FND and in the nets containing both cheese Cheese 1 315.4 315.4"" and soybean catch success was 58.7 FND. The small in­ Soybean x cheese 1 21.0 21.0 crease in catch with the addition of soybean to cheese was Residual 69 767.2 11.l not significant (P > .05). The difference in the catch of cat­ Total (corrected) 127 2316.4 fish between the unbaited control and nets containing soy­ " Significant at .05 level. bean was 13.6, which was significant at the 10% level but not at the 5% level. There was little doubt catfish were seek­ "" Significant at .01 level. ing baited nets.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Food Habits of the Southern Channel Catfish (Ictalurus Lacustris Punctatus)
    FOOD IIABITS OF TIlE SOUTHERN CHANNEL CATFIStt (ICTALURUS LACUSTRIS PUNCTATUS) IN TItE DES MOINES R,IVER, 'IOWA t I•r:EVE M. BAILEY 2 Muse•,l, of Zoology, U•ffversity of Michigan,, Ann Arbor M•chigan AND H•u•¾ M. H•umso•, J•. Iowa State Co•servcttion(•ommissio,•, Des Moit•cs, Iowa .•BSTRACT The stmnaeh contents of 912 channel catfish (769 containing food) taken iu a short section of the Des Moines River from September, 1940, to October, 1911, are analyzed. The physical and biotic elmraeteristies of the study area are described; a partial list of the fishes present together xvith comments on their importance and relative abundance is included. The ehanuet eatfish is omnivorous, as is revealed by a review of the pertinent literature and by this study. A wide wtriety of organisms is eaten (some 50 families of insects alone are represented--these are listed). Insects and fish serve as staple foods, plant seeds are taken i• season, and various other items are eaten in limited numbers. The principal groups of foods (insects, fish, plants, and miscellaneous) are anMyzed volumetrically, by œrequeney of occurrence, and numerically. In the area studied, catfish grow at a rate of about 4 inches a year during the first 3 years of life (determined by length-frequency analysis). These natural size groups are utilized to establish the relationship between size and food habits. Young fish feed ahnost exclusively on aquatic insect larvae--chiefly midges, blackflies, mayflies, and enddis flies. In fish frmn 4 to 12 inches lo•g insects continue to make up the bulk of the food, but at progressively greater size larger insects (mayflies and caddis flies) are eaten with increasing frequency and dipterans are of less importonce than in the smaller size group; snmll fish and plant seeds become significant items of diet.
    [Show full text]
  • Invasive Catfish Management Strategy August 2020
    Invasive Catfish Management Strategy August 2020 A team from the Virginia Department of Game and Inland Fisheries uses electrofishing to monitor invasive blue catfish in the James River in 2011. (Photo by Matt Rath/Chesapeake Bay Program) I. Introduction This management strategy portrays the outcomes of an interactive workshop (2020 Invasive Catfish Workshop) held by the Invasive Catfish Workgroup at the Virginia Commonwealth University (VCU) Rice Rivers Center in Charles City, Virginia on January 29-30, 2020. The workshop convened a diverse group of stakeholders to share the current scientific understanding and priority issues associated with invasive catfishes in Chesapeake Bay. The perspectives shared and insights gained from the workshop were used to develop practical, synergistic recommendations that will improve management and mitigate impacts of these species across jurisdictions within the watershed. Blue catfish (Ictalurus furcatus) and flathead catfish (Pylodictis olivaris) are native to the Ohio, Missouri, Mississippi, and Rio Grande river basins, and were introduced into the Virginia tributaries of Chesapeake Bay in the 1960s and 1970s to establish a recreational fishery. These non-native species have since spread, inhabiting nearly all major tributaries of the Bay watershed. Rapid range expansion and population growth, particularly of blue catfish, have led to increasing concerns about impacts on the ecology of the Chesapeake Bay ecosystem. 1 Chesapeake Bay Management Strategy Invasive Catfish Blue and flathead catfishes are long-lived species that can negatively impact native species in Chesapeake Bay through predation and resource competition. Blue catfish are generalist feeders that prey on a wide variety of species that are locally abundant, including those of economic importance and conservation concern, such as blue crabs, alosines, Atlantic menhaden, American eels, and bay anchovy.
    [Show full text]
  • Feeding Catfish in Commercial Ponds
    SRAC Publication No. 181 February 2008 VI PR Revision Feeding Catfish in Commercial Ponds Menghe H. Li 1 and Edwin H. Robinson 1 Since feeding is the most impor - to meet the fishes’ total nutritional motes total consumption to avoid tant task in the intensive pond requirements for normal growth waste and higher production cost. production of catfish, the person and development. All catfish feeds Catfish feeds are available as meal responsible for feeding should be are manufactured commercially; (powder), crumbles, and floating an experienced fish culturist who none are prepared on the farm. or slow-sinking pellets. Sinking can tell whether or not the fish are Manufacturers usually produce feeds (prepared in a pellet mill) feeding normally by observing “least-cost” formulations rather are seldom used in catfish produc - them as they come to the surface than “fixed-formula” feeds. In tion. Some producers use sinking to feed. This is generally the only least-cost feed formulation, the medicated feed containing oxyte - time the fish can be seen during formulas vary as ingredient prices tracycline because the antibiotic is grow out. Feeding behavior can be change. However, there are several sensitive to the high heat used in an important clue to the general limitations in the manufacture of the manufacture of floating feeds. health of the fish and the pond catfish feed using least-cost formu - However, there are now floating environment. If the fish are not lations. oxytetracycline-medicated feeds feeding normally, the person who made with “cold-extrusion” tech - is feeding must inform the farm • There is a relatively small num - nology.
    [Show full text]
  • FAO's International Standard Statistical Classification of Fishery Commodities
    FAO's International Standard Statistical Classification of Fishery Commodities FAO ISSCFC ISSCAAP SITC HS FAO STAT Commodity Names 03 X 03 03 1540 Fish, crustaceans, molluscs and preparations 034 X 034 0302 1540 Fish fresh (live or dead), chilled or frozen 034.1 X 034.1 0302 1540 Fish, fresh (live or dead) or chilled (excluding fillets) 034.1.1 13 034.11 0301.99 1501 Fish live, not for human food 034.1.1.1 39 034.11 0301.99 1501 Ornamental fish, fish ova, fingerlings and fish for breeding 034.1.1.1.10 39 034.11 0301.10 1501 Fish for ornamental purposes 034.1.1.1.20 39 034.11 0301.99 1501 Fish ova, fingerlings and fish for breeding 034.1.2 X 034.110301.99 1501 Fish live, for human food 034.1.2.1 X 034.110301.99 1501 Fish live for human food 034.1.2.1.10 22 034.11 0301.92 1501 Eels and elvers live 034.1.2.1.20 23 034.11 0301.91 1501 Trouts and chars live 034.1.2.1.30 11 034.11 0301.93 1501 Carps live 034.1.2.1.90 39 034.11 0301.99 1501 Fish live, nei 034.1.2.2 X 034.110301.99 1501 Fish for culture 034.1.3 10 034.18 0302.69 1501 Freshwater fishes, fresh or chilled 034.1.3.1 11 034.18 0302.69 1501 Carps, barbels and other cyprinids, fresh or chilled 034.1.3.1.10 11 034.18 0302.69 1501 Carps, fresh or chilled 034.1.3.2 12 034.18 0302.69 1501 Tilapias and other cichlids, fresh or chilled 034.1.3.2.20 12 034.18 0302.69 1501 Tilapias, fresh or chilled 034.1.3.9 10 034.18 0302.69 1501 Miscellaneous freshwater fishes, fresh or chilled 034.1.3.9.20 13 034.18 0302.69 1501 Pike, fresh or chilled 034.1.3.9.30 13 034.18 0302.69 1501 Catfish, fresh or
    [Show full text]
  • Should I Eat the Fish I Catch?
    EPA 823-F-14-002 For More Information October 2014 Introduction What can I do to reduce my health risks from eating fish containing chemical For more information about reducing your Fish are an important part of a healthy diet. pollutants? health risks from eating fish that contain chemi- Office of Science and Technology (4305T) They are a lean, low-calorie source of protein. cal pollutants, contact your local or state health Some sport fish caught in the nation’s lakes, Following these steps can reduce your health or environmental protection department. You rivers, oceans, and estuaries, however, may risks from eating fish containing chemical can find links to state fish advisory programs Should I Eat the contain chemicals that could pose health risks if pollutants. The rest of the brochure explains and your state’s fish advisory program contact these fish are eaten in large amounts. these recommendations in more detail. on the National Fish Advisory Program website Fish I Catch? at: http://water.epa.gov/scitech/swguidance/fish- The purpose of this brochure is not to 1. Look for warning signs or call your shellfish/fishadvisories/index.cfm. discourage you from eating fish. It is intended local or state environmental health as a guide to help you select and prepare fish department. Contact them before you You may also contact: that are low in chemical pollutants. By following fish to see if any advisories are posted in these recommendations, you and your family areas where you want to fish. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency can continue to enjoy the benefits of eating fish.
    [Show full text]
  • A Brief Diet Analysis of Common Carp and Channel Catfish by Brent Campos
    A Brief Diet Analysis of Common Carp and Channel Catfish By Brent Campos Four mainstem nonnative fish, two channel catfish (Ictalurus punctatus) and two common carp (Cyprinus carpio), were captured using hook-and-line during our research expedition down the Grand Canyon in March, 2005. The stomachs of the fish were removed and their contents analyzed. The two species of fish appeared to exhibit divergent methods of feeding, despite having very similar organisms in their stomachs. Catfish displayed a selective, possibly mid-water picking strategy, while carp appeared to be consuming benthic substrates with their prey. Figure 1. The 405 mm common carp with its abdominal cavity cut open. Note the large ovaries, which are yellow and grainy in appearance (photo: Chris Hammersmark). One common carp was caught near sunset in a small eddy near Bass Camp at river mile 108 on March 21. It was male, measured 370 mm standard length (SL) and exhibited spawning colors. Identifiable stomach contents included aquatic Coeloptra (beetles), one oligochete, many pebbles, and detritus, among other benthic inverts. The presence of numerous pebbles indicates this fish was probing substrates for food, as would be expected for this species. The second common carp was caught near the mouth of the backwater at river mile 137, which was at the separation point of the eddy that created the site’s sandbar. The carp was female, 405 mm in length (standard length), and displayed spawning colors. Her ovaries made up approximately 50% of her abdominal cavity by volume. Gut contents were comprised of 95% algae and 5% a mix of detritus and aquatic invertebrates.
    [Show full text]
  • Recycled Fish Sculpture (.PDF)
    Recycled Fish Sculpture Name:__________ Fish: are a paraphyletic group of organisms that consist of all gill-bearing aquatic vertebrate animals that lack limbs with digits. At 32,000 species, fish exhibit greater species diversity than any other group of vertebrates. Sculpture: is three-dimensional artwork created by shaping or combining hard materials—typically stone such as marble—or metal, glass, or wood. Softer ("plastic") materials can also be used, such as clay, textiles, plastics, polymers and softer metals. They may be assembled such as by welding or gluing or by firing, molded or cast. Researched Photo Source: Alaskan Rainbow STEP ONE: CHOOSE one fish from the attached Fish Names list. Trout STEP TWO: RESEARCH on-line and complete the attached K/U Fish Research Sheet. STEP THREE: DRAW 3 conceptual sketches with colour pencil crayons of possible visual images that represent your researched fish. STEP FOUR: Once your fish designs are approved by the teacher, DRAW a representational outline of your fish on the 18 x24 and then add VALUE and COLOUR . CONSIDER: Individual shapes and forms for the various parts you will cut out of recycled pop aluminum cans (such as individual scales, gills, fins etc.) STEP FIVE: CUT OUT using scissors the various individual sections of your chosen fish from recycled pop aluminum cans. OVERLAY them on top of your 18 x 24 Representational Outline 18 x 24 Drawing representational drawing to judge the shape and size of each piece. STEP SIX: Once you have cut out all your shapes and forms, GLUE the various pieces together with a glue gun.
    [Show full text]
  • Safe Weekly Amounts of Mercury in Fish
    Safe weekly amounts of mercury in fish Florida testing for mercury in a variety of fish is helpful for calculating the amount of seafood a person can eat, and still stay within the EPA Reference Dose for mercury – the amount of mercury a person can consume on a continuing basis without fear of ill effects. Safe amounts of fish are calculated by weekly doses. Amounts are cumulative; each meal must be counted against the weekly reference dose. Mercury amounts vary from fish to fish, and the averages below should serve only as guidelines. How to use the chart When calculating weekly allowances of fish, refer to the box closest to your weight and see the safe amount in ounces (a typical serving of fish is about 6 ounces). For instance, if you weigh 150 pounds you should limit yourself to 4.6 ounces per week of Red Grouper. For Snook you could eat no more than 4.2 ounces per week. To eat more than one kind of fish or more than one fish meal per week, you would want to select species with high allowances, such as mullet (72.4 ounces per week) or sand bream (22.4 ounces). PPM WEIGHT OF INDIVIDUAL COMMON NAME MERCURY 50 LBS 100 LBS 150 LBS 200 LBS 250 LBS Smoked Salmon (unspecified species) 0.039 14.8 oz 29.6 44.4 59.2 73.0 Salmon (unspecified species) 0.04 14.3 28.6 42.9 57.1 70.5 Vermillion Snapper 0.051 11.2 22.4 33.6 44.8 55.3 Crabmeat (lump) 0.066 8.7 17.3 26.0 34.6 42.7 Yellowtail Snapper 0.078 7.3 14.7 22.0 29.4 36.3 Crabmeat (claw) 0.092 6.2 12.4 18.6 24.8 30.7 Lane Snapper 0.182 3.1 6.3 9.4 12.6 15.5 Canned Tuna (light) 0.205 2.8 5.6
    [Show full text]
  • Channel Catfish (Ictalurus Punctatus)
    Indiana Division of Fish and Wildlife’s Animal Information Series Channel Catfish (Ictalurus punctatus) Do they have any other names? Other names for channel catfish are spotted cat, blue cat, fiddler, lady cat, chucklehead cat, and willow cat. Why are they called channel catfish? They are called catfish because their barbels resemble the whiskers of a cat. Ictalurus is Greek for “fish cat” and punctatus is Latin for “spotted,” in reference to the dark spots on the body. What do they look like? Channel catfish are slender catfish with a deeply forked tail. The back and sides are olive-brown or slate-blue with few to many round black spots and the belly is slivery- white. The skin is smooth and scaleless and there are four barbels near the mouth that resemble the whiskers of a cat. They have sharp spines at the front of the dorsal (back) fin and two pectoral fins (belly fins closest to head). Photo Credit: Duane Raver, USFWS Where do they live in Indiana? Channel catfish are common throughout Indiana and can be found in the deep pools and runs of rivers and in lakes. 2012-MLC Page 1 What kind of habitat do they need? In the river, adults are usually found in the larger pools, in deep water, or about submerged logs or other cover during the day. Then, they move into the riffles or shallow water at night to feed. The young are usually in the riffles or shallower waters. How do they reproduce? Channel catfish spawn from the end of May through July.
    [Show full text]
  • If I Catch It, Can I Eat
    This pamphlet will give you information that will help your If I Catch It, family avoid chemicals in fish and eat fish safely. Fish from Connecticut’s waters are a healthy, low-cost source of protein. Can I Eat It? Unfortunately, some fish take up chemicals such as mercury and polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs). These chemicals can build up in your body and increase health risks. The developing fetus and young children are most sensitive. Women who eat A Guide to Eating Fish Safely fish containing these chemicals before or during pregnancy or nursing may have 2020 Connecticut Fish Consumption Advisory children who are slow to develop and learn. Long term exposure to PCBs may increase cancer risk. What Does The Fish Consumption Advisory Say? The advisory tells you how often you can safely eat fish from Connecticut’s waters and from a store or restaurant. In many cases, separate advice is given for the High Risk and Low Risk Groups. • You are in the High Risk Group if you are a pregnant woman, a woman who could become pregnant, a nursing mother, or a child under six. • If you do not fit into the High Risk Group, you are in the Low Risk Group. Advice is given for three different types of fish consumption: 1. Statewide FRESHWATER Fish Advisory: Most freshwater fish in Connecticut contain enough mercury to cause some limit to consumption. The statewide freshwater advice is that: • High Risk Group: eat no more than 1 meal per month • Low Risk Group: eat no more than 1 meal per week 2.
    [Show full text]
  • NJDEP Fish Consumption Brochure
    2009 Updated - June 2009 Jon S. Corzine Mark N. Mauriello Heather Howard Governor Commissioner Commissioner State of New Jersey Department of Department of Health Environmental Protection and Senior Services Contents Introduction...................................................................................................................................1 Health Effects from Consumption of Contaminated Fish and Crabs......................................................................................................................1 General Consumption Guidelines..........................................................................................2 Preparation and Cooking Methods for Fish and Crabs under Advisory.......................................................................................................................2 contents Federal Advice on Fish Consumption....................................................................................3 2009 Fish Consumption Advisory Tables...............................................................................5 Statewide Water Body Locations Map.................................................................................17 Map of Northeast New Jersey Advisory aters.....................................................................19 The New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection and the New Jersey Department of Health and Senior Services can provide more information on the advisories and the health effects of chemical contaminants in the fish. To stay
    [Show full text]
  • Florida Recreational Saltwater Fishing Regulations
    Issued: July 2015 Florida Recreational New regulations are highlighted in red Regulations apply to state waters of the Gulf and Atlantic Saltwater Fishing Regulations (please visit: MyFWC.com/Fishing/Saltwater/Recreational for the most current regulations) All art: © Diane Rome Peebles, except snowy grouper (Duane Raver) Reef Fish Snappers General Snappers Regulations: • Within state waters of the Atlantic and Gulf, the snapper aggregate bag limit is 10 fish ● ● ● ● per harvester unless the species Snapper, Cubera Snapper, Red Snapper, Vermilion Snapper, Lane rule specifies that it is not Minimum Size Limits: Minimum Size Limits: Minimum Size Limits: Minimum Size Limits: included in the aggregate. This • Atlantic and Gulf - 12" (see remarks) • Atlantic - 20" • Atlantic - 12" • Atlantic and Gulf - 8" means that a harvester can • Gulf - 16" • Gulf - 10" retain a total of 10 snappers Daily Recreational Bag Limit: Daily Recreational Bag Limit: in any combination of species. • Atlantic and Gulf - 10 per harvester Season: Daily Recreational Bag Limit: • Atlantic - 10 per harvester • Atlantic - Open year-round • Atlantic - 5 per harvester • Gulf - 100 pounds (see remarks) Exceptions are noted below. Remarks • Gulf - May 23–July 12; Sept. 5, 6, 7; • Gulf - 10 per harvester • If no season information is • May possess no more than 2 over Remarks and every Saturday and Sunday in included, the species is open 30" per harvester or vessel per day, Remarks • Gulf not included within the snapper Sept. and Oct.; and Nov. 1 year-round. whichever is less. 30" or larger not • Not included within the snapper aggregate bag limit. included within the snapper aggregate Daily Recreational Bag Limit: aggregate bag limit.
    [Show full text]