DOCSLIB.ORG

The Foreign Service Journal, April 1981

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Foreign Service Journal, April 1981 foreign Scmce journal APRIL 1981 75 CENTS Armies in Flight by Nicholas Davies Bruce Laingen Talks with the Journal The Visa by John A. Bovey Special Election Section When you’re going overseas, you have enough to worry about without worrying about your insurance,too. Moving overseas can be a very traumatic time if you Moving overseas is simplified by the AFSA-sponsored don't have the proper insurance. The fact is, the government insurance program for AFSA members. Our insurance will be responsible for only $15,000 worth of your belongings. program will take care of most of your worries. If any of your personal valuables such as cameras, jewelry, With our program, you can purchase as much property furs and fine arts are destroyed, damaged or stolen, you insurance as you feel you need at only 75<t per $100, and it would receive not the replacement cost of the goods, but only covers you for the replacement cost of household furniture a portion of what you'd have to pay to replace them. and personal effects that are destroyed, damaged or stolen, Claims processes are another headache you shouldn't with no depreciation. You can also insure your valuable have to worry about. The government claims process is articles on an agreed amount basis, without any limitation. usually lengthy and requires investigation and AFSA coverage is worldwide, whether on business or documentation. pleasure. Should you have a problem, we provide simple, If you limit yourself to the protection provided under the fast, efficient claims service that begins with a simple phone Claims Act, you will not have worldwide comprehensive call or letter, and ends with payment in either U.S. dollars personal liability insurance, complete theft coverage or or local currency. coverage for your personal valuables on an agreed amount With the AFSA plan, you can also get comprehensive basis. Can you afford to travel overseas without this personal liability insurance, complete theft coverage and additional protection? itemized protection for your valuable articles. You have enough to worry about. Let us take care of your insurance. AFSA Desk, The Hirshorn Company 14 East Highland Avenue Philadelphia, Pa. 19118 (215) CH 2-8200* Send me your free brochure (with built-in application form) that answers my questions about overseas insurance. Name Address City/State/Zip Note: The insurance policies, not this advertisement, will form the contract •|f calling from the Washington between the insured and the insurance company. The policies contain limits, D.C. area (202) 457-0250 exclusions and limitations not listed here. 481 SE>reign emcc journal( American Foreign Service Association APRIL 1981: Volume 58. No. 4 Officers and Members of the Governing Board ISSN 0015-7279 KENNETH W BLEAKLEY. President ANTHEA S. DE ROUVILLE, Vice President FRANK DIMOND. Second Vice President GALEN FOX, Secretary Communication re: Moonlight War at RON WITHERELL, Treasurer JONATHAN L, SPERLING, AID Representative BEX STEPHEN M. CHAPLIN, ICA Representative LEONARDO NEHER 6 MATTHEW P, DALEY, JOSEPH N. MCBRIDE. ROBERT H. STERN, State Representatives SPENCER KING AND CHARLES WHITEHOUSE, Armies in Flight: Portraits from a Retired Representatives Dissident Diary Journal Editorial Board NICHOLAS DAVIES 14 JOEL M. WOLDMAN, Chairman H. KENNETH HILL JAMES F. O'CONNOR JAMES L. ROUSH Diplomacy: The Role of the Wife HARRIET P. CULLEY DONALD MACCORQUODALE PENELOPE LAINGEN 18 WESLEY N. PEDERSEN DAVID WILSON GEORGE S. DRAGNICH Bruce Laingen Talks with the Journal 20 Staff The Visa ROBERT M BEERS, Executive Director SUSAN HOLIK. General Counsel JOHN A. BOVEY 30 SABINE SISK, Members' Interest/Grievance Representative PAT GUILD. Executive Secretary Freyja CECIL B. SANNER, Membership and Circulation STEPHANIE HUGHES 36 AFSA Scholarship Programs DAWN CUTHELL Journal SHIRLEY R. NEWHALL, Editor Letters to the Editor 4 STEVEN M. BERKOWITZ, Editorial Assistant Editorial 13 MclVER ART & PUBLICATIONS, INC., Art Direction Association News 23 Bookshelf 37 Foreign Service People 46 Advertising Representatives JAMES C. SASMOR ASSOCIATES. 521 Fifth Ave.. Suite 1700, New York, N.Y. 10017 (212) 683-3421 ALBERT D. SHONK CO., 681 Market St., San Francisco, Calif. 94105 (415) 392-7144 JOSHUA B. POWERS, LTD., 46 Keyes House, Dolphin Sq.. London SW1 01-834-8023/9. International Representatives. COVER: Adam and Eve by Peter P. Cecere The FOREIGN SERVICE JOURNAL is the journal of professionals in foreign annually. Retired Active Members—Dues are $40 annually for members with affairs, published eleven times a year by the American Foreign Service incomes over $30,000: $25 annually for less than $20,000. Associate Mem¬ Association, a non-profit organization. bers—Dues are $25 annually. All dues payments include $6.50 allocation Material appearing herein represents the opinions of the writers and is not for the Journal and AFSA News, per AFSA Bylaws. intended to indicate the official views of the Department of State, the In¬ For subscription to the JOURNAL, one year (11 issues): $7.50: two years. ternational Communication Agency, the Agency for International Development $12.00, For subscriptions going abroad, except Canada, add $1.00 annually or the United States Government as a whole. for overseas postage. While the Editorial Board of the JOURNAL is responsible for its general Microfilm copies of current as well as of back issues of the FOREIGN content, statements concerning the policy and administration of AFSA as SERVICE JOURNAL are available through the University Microfilm Library employee representative under Executive Order 11636 on the editorial page Services, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48106 under a contract signed October 30. and in the AFSA News, and all communications relating to these, are the 1967. responsibility of the AFSA Governing Board. American Foreign Service Association, 1981. The Foreign Service Journal Membership in the American Foreign Service Association is open to the is published eleven times a year by the American Foreign Service Association, professionals in foreign affairs overseas or in Washington, as well as to per¬ 2101 E Street. N.W., Washington. D C. 20037. Telephone (202) 338-4045. sons having an active interest in, or close association with foreign affairs. Second-class postage paid at Washington, D.C. and at additional post office Membership dues are: Active Members—Dues range from $52 to $104 her article, “looking back over the we provide to help them make in¬ Letters last decade, progress is visible while formed judgments. far from enough.” Those who participate as discus¬ Progress Is Visible DOROTHY DILLON sion leaders not only have the op¬ Director portunity to make constructive use Barbara Good’s article on “Women Washington Center for of their own experience and exper¬ in the Foreign Service: A Quiet Latin American Studies tise but also broaden their knowl¬ Revolution” in the Foreign Service edge of this country and perhaps Journal of January 1981 focused gain additional perspective on our primarily on women in the Foreign Foreign Service Constituency foreign policy. Mr. Roush's offer to Service in positions falling within be a source of further information is the jurisdiction of the Department of merican consulate Oporto re¬ A a welcome one—I hope he is inun¬ State. As a retired Foreign Service ceived news of the hostages’ re¬ dated with inquiries. Information officer, I should like to lease with jubilation, relief and the Anyone who wishes to get in add a footnote to her article by fo¬ strong hope that the administration, touch with the Foreign Policy Asso¬ cusing on discrimination against the department, and AFSA will ciation directly can do so at 205 women in the US Information Agen¬ know how to utilize this tragic event Lexington Avenue, New York. NY cy and its successor, the US Interna¬ finally to convince the American 10016 or (212) 481-8450. Needless tional Communication Agency. people that diplomacy is the first to say, those who would like to help In 1968, two years before Alison line of national security. It is only at us in our efforts with contributions Palmer brought the first formal dis¬ great peril that we persist in perpet¬ can use the same address. We have crimination complaint against the uating our historical error of neglec¬ been engaged in citizen education in Department of State, I had filed a ting diplomacy and permitting situa¬ foreign affairs for 63 years but it still similar complaint against USIA. I tions to develop whose tardy solu¬ takes money to keep the machine did so with the thought that if I won tions end up costing us dearly in going. my case, it might help other women human life and national treasure. in the agency who had been discrim¬ The hostages should prove a precious WILLIAM E. SCHAUFELF., JR. President inated against in work assignments resource to demonstrate to our citi¬ and promotions but who were un¬ zens just what sort of business the Foreign Service really is and the Editor’s Note: To support the Great willing to risk reprisal by raising the Decisions program. FPA prepares each issue publicly. 1 had four very clear- kind of problems our nation faces in year a booklet setting forth the principal cut cases of discrimination against the world today. The department can issues involved in the eight Great Deci¬ me—two in the Civil Service and no longer justify its failure to build a sions topics and gives pros and cons of two in the Foreign Service—and much needed constituency. various potential policy responses. Over¬ hence felt that I could prove my ROBERT F. ILLING seas posts can obtain copies of the FPA allegations. As it turned out. there Oporto booklet through the ICA Library in was no contest. The agency readily Washington. admitted that 1 had indeed been the Great Decisions victim of discrimination and placed The Consular Field this verdict in my personnel file.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Supreme Court of the United States
    No. 04-5928 IN THE Supreme Court of the United States JOSÉ ERNESTO MEDELLÍN, Petitioner, v. DOUG DRETKE, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION, Respondent. ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT BRIEF AMICUS CURIAE OF AMBASSADOR L. BRUCE LAINGEN AND LIEUTENANT COLONEL JOHN J. SWIFT, ET AL., IN SUPPORT OF PETITIONER JOSEPH MARGULIES MACARTHUR JUSTICE CENTER UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO LAW SCHOOL TH 1111 EAST 60 STREET CHICAGO, IL 60637 Telephone: (773) 702-9560 Counsel for Amici i TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Table of Authorities…………………………………….. ii Interest of Amici Curiae………………………………… 1 Summary of Argument…………………………………. 5 Argument……………………………………………….. 6 I. The United States Played A Leading Role In Developing The International Protections Provided By Both The Vienna Convention And The Optional Protocol………………….. 6 II. Failure To Provide Vigorous And Robust Enforcement Of The Vienna Convention Could Have Grave Consequences For U.S. Citizens Abroad………………………............ 16 Conclusion……………………………………………….. 27 ii TABLE OF AUTHORITIES Page(s) CASES: Breard v. Pruett, 134 F.3d 615 (4th Cir. 1998).......................................22 Case Concerning United States Diplomatic and Consular Staff in Tehran, (U.S.A. v. Iran), 1980 I.C.J. 3 (Judgment of May 24).................................................14 Flores v. State, 994 P.2d 782 (Okla. Crim. App. 1999)......................23 Standt v. City of New York, 153 F. Supp. 2d 417 (S.D.N.Y. 2001)................... 21-22 U.S. v. Carillo 70 F. Supp. 2d 854 (N.D. Ill. 1999) ............................22 TREATIES: Vienna Convention on Consular Relations, April 24, 1963, 21 U.S.T. 77, 596 UNTS 261...............................passim Optional Protocol Concerning the Compulsory Settlement of Disputes, April 24, 1963, 21 U.S.T.
    [Show full text]
  • American Diplomacy at Risk
    American Diplomacy at Risk APRIL 2015 American Academy of Diplomacy April 2015 | 1 American Academy of Diplomacy American Diplomacy at Risk APRIL 2015 © Copyright 2015 American Academy of Diplomacy 1200 18th Street NW, Suite 902 Washington DC 20036 202.331.3721 www.academyofdiplomacy.org Contents Participants . 6 Donors . 7 I . Introduction: American Diplomacy at Risk . 9 II . The Politicization of American Diplomacy . 14 A. General Discussion . 14 B. The Cost of Non-Career Political Appointees . .15 C. Recommendations . 17 III . The Nullification of the Foreign Service Act of 1980 . .22 . A. General Discussion . 22 B. Recommendations . 24 IV . Valuing the Professional Career Foreign Service . .30 A. Basic Skills of Diplomacy . 30 B. Diplomatic Readiness Compromised . 31 C. Background . 34 D. Entry-Level Recommendations . 39 E. Mid-Level Recommendations . 42 V . Defining and Improving Opportunities for Professional Civil Service Employees 44 A. Discussion . 44 B. Recommendations . 45 VI . State’s Workforce Development, Organization and Management . .47 A. Discussion . 47 B. Recommendations . 47 Appendix A . 51 Washington Post op-ed by Susan R. Johnson, Ronald E. Neumann and Thomas R. Pickering of April 11, 2013 Appendix B . 53 State Press Guidance of April 12, 2013 Appendix C . 55 List of Special Advisors, Envoys and Representatives Appendix D . 57 Project Paper: Study of Entry-Level Officers, The Foreign Service Professionalism Project for the American Academy of Diplomacy, by Jack Zetkulic, July 9, 2014 American Diplomacy at Risk Participants Project Team Ambassador Thomas D. Boyatt, Susan Johnson, Ambassador Lange Schermerhorn, Ambassador Clyde Taylor Co-Chairs Ambassador Marc Grossman and Ambassador Thomas R. Pickering Chair of Red Team Ambassador Edward Rowell American Academy of Diplomacy Support Team President: Ambassador Ronald E.
    [Show full text]
  • 20 YEARS LATER Where Does Diplomacy Stand?
    PUBLISHED BY THE AMERICAN FOREIGN SERVICE ASSOCIATION SEPTEMBER 2021 20 YEARS LATER Where Does Diplomacy Stand? September 2021 Volume 98, No. 7 Focus on 9/11, Twenty Years Later 22 Getting Off the X In a compelling personal account of the 9/11 attacks, one FSO offers tactics for surviving when catastrophe strikes. By Nancy Ostrowski 26 The Global War on Terror and Diplomatic Practice The war on terror fundamentally changed U.S. diplomacy, leaving a trail 39 of collateral damage to America’s readiness for future challenges. Intervention: FS Know-How By Larry Butler Unlearned Lessons, or the Gripes of a Professional 46 31 The State Department’s failure to Whistleblower effectively staff and run interventions Protections: America and 9/11: has a long history. Four critical A Nonpartisan The Real-World Impact of lessons can be drawn from the post-9/11 experience. Necessity Terrorism and Extremism As old as the United States itself, In retrospect, 9/11 did not foreshadow By Ronald E. Neumann whistleblowing has protections the major changes that now drive worth knowing about. U.S. foreign policy and national security strategy. By Alain Norman and 43 Raeka Safai By Anthony H . Cordesman From the FSJ Archive 9/11, War on Terror, Iraq 35 and Afghanistan FS Heritage The Proper Measure of the Place: 48 Reflections on the Diplomats Make Afghan Mission a Difference: Drawing from two tours, a decade The U.S. and Mongolia, apart, a veteran diplomat explores the competing visions for Afghanistan. 1986-1990 In the 1992 FSJ, Ambassador By Keith W.
    [Show full text]
  • Association for Diplomatic Studies and Training Foreign Affairs Oral History Project
    Association for Diplomatic Studies and Training Foreign Affairs Oral History Project ELEANORE RAVEN-HAMILTON Interviewed by: Edward Dillery Initial Interview Date: November 18, 2009. Copyright 2012 ADST TABLE OF CONTENTS Background Born and raised in Ne York City BA from Rosemont College, Rosemont, PA, %une 1956 MA from American University of Beirut, ,ebanon, %une 196. Entered the Foreign Service in 195. A1100 Course Ne York City3 State Department 4isitors5 Center 195. ,eader 6rants 7ashington, DC, State Department3 4oluntary 4isitors Program 195.11959 Operations Marriage Resignation from the Foreign Service 1959 Ne Delhi, India3 7ife of USAID Officer, %ac9ues Raven 195911962 ,iving 9uarters and environment Birth of son Anglo1Indians Daily living Travels US presidential elections 7ashington, D.C. 7ife of USAID officer 196211964 Beirut. ,ebanon3 7ife of United Nations Development Officer 19641196. American University of Beirut, Masters degree studies Children5s education Environment The American University of Beirut State Department Arabic language program ,ebanese ethnic and religious mix 1 Palestinians San Francisco, California3 7ife of 7ells Fargo Officer 196.11969 Head start program Teacher, French1American Bilingual School Paris, France3 19691 19.5 Teacher, American School of Paris Teacher, Marymount school Medical problems Application to rejoin the Foreign Service Divorce Re1joined the Foreign Service 19.5 State Department3 Foreign Service Institute (FSI); Farsi 19.5 ,anguage training Family obligations Teheran, Iran3 Consular Officer
    [Show full text]
  • FLAG and the Diplomacy of the Iran Hostage Families
    Daniel Strieff FLAG and the diplomacy of the Iran hostage families Article (Accepted version) (Refereed) Original citation: Strieff, Daniel (2017) FLAG and the diplomacy of the Iran hostage families. Diplomacy and Statecraft, 28 (4). pp. 702-725. ISSN 0959-2296 DOI: 10.1080/09592296.2017.1386465 © 2017 Taylor & Francis Group, LLC This version available at: http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/86833/ Available in LSE Research Online: February 2018 LSE has developed LSE Research Online so that users may access research output of the School. Copyright © and Moral Rights for the papers on this site are retained by the individual authors and/or other copyright owners. Users may download and/or print one copy of any article(s) in LSE Research Online to facilitate their private study or for non-commercial research. You may not engage in further distribution of the material or use it for any profit-making activities or any commercial gain. You may freely distribute the URL (http://eprints.lse.ac.uk) of the LSE Research Online website. This document is the author’s final accepted version of the journal article. There may be differences between this version and the published version. You are advised to consult the publisher’s version if you wish to cite from it. 1 FLAG and the Diplomacy of the Iran Hostage Families Daniel Strieff Abstract. The extraordinary public diplomacy carried out by the families of the American hostages held in Iran from 1979-1981 played a pivotal role in domesticating and humanising the biggest foreign policy crisis of Jimmy Carter’s presidency.
    [Show full text]
  • US Foreign Policy and Its Perspectives on Revolutionary Iran
    A Fleeting, Forgotten, Modus Vivendi: U.S. Foreign Policy and its Perspectives on Revolutionary Iran Before the Hostage Crisis of 1979 By Nathan Eckman Senior Thesis Spring 2018 Columbia University Department of History Seminar Advisor: Matthew Connelly Faculty Advisor: Peter Awn Table of Contents 2 Preface & Acknowledgments 3 Introduction 11 Chapter One: America, The Arbiter January – December, 1978 25 Chapter Two: “The Islamic Movement Will Squander” January – April, 1979 42 Chapter Three: Dawn in Qom, Dusk in Tehran May – November, 1979 54 Conclusion 60 Bibliography Eckman 1 Preface & Acknowledgments Four years ago I was in the Middle East wearing Marine Corps combat utilities. The men I trained beside, the seas and straits my ship traveled through, and the lands my platoon traversed illuminated the complexity and richness of the Middle East as a whole. I became fascinated with the region’s history and the United States’ involvement in it. It was also then that I decided to study the region whenever and wherever I went to school. Even then, due in part to its mysterious image and rogue-classification, I knew Iran must be the topic of my studies. So to begin, I must thank Columbia University and its History Department for providing me the opportunity to make my intellectual aspirations a reality. My years at this institution have challenged me on nearly every front and simultaneously given me the autonomy to find answers for myself. This, of course, is possible only because of the people that are the fabric of this great institution. It is tempting to list every man and woman who helped me along this journey.
    [Show full text]
  • The Fates of American Presidents Who Challenged the Deep State (1963-1980) アメリカの深層国家に抗した大統領の運 命(1963-1980)
    Volume 12 | Issue 43 | Number 4 | Article ID 4206 | Oct 20, 2014 The Asia-Pacific Journal | Japan Focus The Fates of American Presidents Who Challenged the Deep State (1963-1980) アメリカの深層国家に抗した大統領の運 命(1963-1980) Peter Dale Scott In the last decade it has become more and subsurface part of the iceberg I more obvious that we have in America today shall call the Deep State, which what the journalists Dana Priest and William operates according to its own Arkin have called compass heading regardless of who is formally in power.3 two governments: the one its citizens were familiar with, I believe that a significant shift in the operated more or less in the open: relationship between public and deep state the other a parallel top secret power occurred in the 1960s and 1970s, government whose parts had culminating in the Reagan Revolution of 1980. mushroomed in less than a decade In this period five presidents sought to curtail into a gigantic, sprawling universe the powers of the deep state. And as we shall of its own, visible to only a see, the political careers of all five—Kennedy, carefully vetted cadre—and its Johnson, Nixon, Ford and Carter—were cut off entirety . visible only to God.1 in ways that were unusual. One president, Kennedy, was assassinated. Another, Nixon, was forced to resign. And in 2013, particularly after the military return to power in Egypt, more and more To some extent the interplay of these two forms authors referred to this second level asof power and political organization is found in 2 America’s “deep state.” Here for example is all societies.
    [Show full text]
  • Interview with L. Bruce Laingen
    Library of Congress Interview with L. Bruce Laingen The Association for Diplomatic Studies and Training Foreign Affairs Oral History Project AMBASSADOR L. BRUCE LAINGEN Interviewed by: Charles Stuart Kennedy Initial interview date: January 9, 1993 Copyright 1998 ADST Q: Today is January 9, 1992. This is an interview with Ambassador Bruce Laingen on behalf of the Association for Diplomatic Studies and I am Charles Stuart Kennedy. Bruce, I wonder if you could give me a little about your background — where you came from, your education, etc. LAINGEN: I was a farm boy from Minnesota growing up on a farm in southern Minnesota. I am often asked why I joined the Foreign Service and I give the answer that we couldn't all be farmers. I had some brothers and I began to look beyond that. I went to school at St. Olaf College in Minnesota. It was a liberal arts school in that part of the country. I served in the Navy in World War II and then took a Masters degree in International Relations at the University of Minnesota in 1949. Q: What did you do in the Navy? Where did you serve? LAINGEN: I was a V-12 Apprentice Seaman at the University of Dubuque, Iowa, in 1943. Q: V-12 meaning a reserve program for 12 weeks which turned you into an officer, or something like that? Interview with L. Bruce Laingen http://www.loc.gov/item/mfdipbib000651 Library of Congress LAINGEN: Not quite. It was a program that picked up people at mid-term in their college career and sent them off to another college for six months.
    [Show full text]
  • The Association for Diplomatic Studies and Training Foreign Affairs Oral History Project
    The Association for Diplomatic Studies and Training Foreign Affairs Oral History Project AMBASSADOR L. BRUCE LAINGEN Interviewed by: Charles Stuart Kennedy Initial interview date: January 9, 1993 Copyright 1998 A ST TABLE OF CONTENTS Background Born and raised in Minnesota St Olaf College, University of Minnesota U S Navy, World War II (oined Foreign Service 1950 West -ermany 1951.1953 0reis Officer Ham1urg, vice consul Teheran, Iran 1953.1955 Meshed, economic officer 2ehedi overthro3s Mossadegh Am1assador 4oy Henderson Political situation U S influence The Shah NEA 1955.1960 -reek desk officer Cyprus pro1lems 0arachi, Pakistan 1960.1967 Political officer Political situation Divided Pakistan India vs Pakistan 8ice President (ohnson visit President Ayu1 Soviets NEA 1967.1968 1 Director, Pakistan and Afghanistan Affairs National War College 0a1ul, Afghanistan 1968.1971 Deputy Chief of Mission Am1assador and Mrs Ro1ert Neumann Peace Corps Political Corps Political situation American —hippies“ NEA 1971.1977 Director of Pakistan and Afghanistan Affairs Pakistan split, Bangladesh formed Pakistan vs India Simla Agreement Bhutto Deputy Assistant Secretary 1977.1975 EUR 1975.1977 Deputy Assistant Secretary for Southern Europe Spain>s (uan Carlos Cyprus pro1lem 8alletta, Malta 1977.1979 Am1assador U S interests Mintoff 4i1ya and Qadhafi SCCE conference Teheran, Iran 1979.1980 Chargé d>Affaires Em1assy —protected“ by thugs Political turmoil Em1assy attacked and su1seAuently seiBed again Aftermath of revolution Functioning as an em1assy Iran Provisional
    [Show full text]
  • Interview with Henry Precht
    Library of Congress Interview with Henry Precht The Association for Diplomatic Studies and Training Foreign Affairs Oral History Project HENRY PRECHT Interviewed by: Charles Stuart Kennedy Initial interview date: March 8, 2000 Copyright 2001 ADST Q: Today is March 8, 2000. This is an interview with Henry Precht being done by the Association for Diplomatic Studies and Training and I am Charles Stuart Kennedy. Henry, could you tell me when and where you were born and a little about your parents? PRECHT: I was born June 15, 1932 in Savannah, Georgia. My father was a clerk in a local fertilizer factory and my mother was a former school teacher and secretary in a bank. Nobody in my family, except my mother for two years, had any college education. I went to Armstrong Junior College in Savannah and then to Emory University where I had a major in history. Q: Let's go back. What was the background of your mother? Was sha native Georgian? PRECHT: My mother's mother was a native Georgian. Her roots in this country go back, we think, to before Oglethorpe came to Savannah in 1733. Her family was Middleton from South Carolina. My grandfather was a Welshman who had come over with his parents to farm in Kansas and when that went bust and he got tired of school, he ran away and became an itinerant printer, eventually came to Savannah and worked in the print room of Interview with Henry Precht http://www.loc.gov/item/mfdipbib000947 Library of Congress the Savannah Morning News where my grandmother's father was the foreman.
    [Show full text]
  • 444 Days: Memoirs of an Iran Hostage
    Moments in U.S. Diplomatic History 444 Days: Memoirs of an Iran Hostage More Moments in U.S. Diplomatic History Categories 12 A Moment in U.S. Diplomatic History More than thirty years later, the Iran Hostage crisis still ranks as one (486) of the most traumatic diplomatic events in U.S. history. Dissatisfied Africa (87) with the corrupt and ineffective regime of Reza Shah Pahlavi, many China (36) Iranian citizens began protesting the Iranian government in 1977. In Cold War (126) 1979 after nearly two years of protests and strikes, the Shah was Consular (74) exiled from Iran and was succeeded by the radical Ayatollah East Asia and Pacific (77) Ruhollah Khomeini as Supreme Leader of the newly established Espionage (29) Islamic republic. The Shah sought asylum and medical care from his Europe (140) erstwhile allies, particularly the United States, which agreed to help. Foreign Service (129) Enraged members of the Iranian Revolution insisted on his return so Hostage (39) that they could prosecute and punish him for his actions. The Human Rights (107) 444-day-long crisis began on November 4th when some 3,000 militant Iranian students stormed the Humorous (121) United States embassy in Tehran, taking nearly sixty diplomats hostage. Middle East (104) Military (204) Revolutionaries demanded that the U.S. return the Shah to Iran. Public Diplomacy (59) After much internal debate, President Jimmy Carter decided not Russia/Soviet Union (89) to do so, given the Shah’s medical condition and his many years as South Central Asia (38) a stalwart American ally. Spouses and children (36) Terrorism (79) Shows such as ABC’s “Nightline” with Ted Koppel had daily The Stump (13) updates on the crisis and counted the days of “America Held Vietnam Conflict (1) Hostage.” Ultimately, the long grind of negotiations and bad Western Hemisphere (77) publicity took its toll on the American psyche and the Carter Women and Minority FSOs (66) presidency; he lost to Ronald Reagan and his campaign for “Morning in America” in the 1980 elections.
    [Show full text]
  • National Commission on the Public Service
    URGENT BUSINESS FOR AMERICA REVITALIZING THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT FOR THE 21ST CENTURY REPORT OF THE NATIONAL COMMISSION ON THE PUBLIC SERVICE JANUARY 2003 PREFACE Fifty years have passed since the last comprehensive reorganization of the federal government. The changes proposed by The Hoover Commission served the nation well as it adapted to the mid-20th century world. It was a world transformed by World War II and the new responsibilities of the United States government at home and abroad. It was also a world in which television was still a curiosity, transportation without jets was slow and expensive, typewriters were still manual, and Xerox machines, personal computers, microchips, and the Internet were unknown and beyond imagination. Medicare and Medicaid did not exist. There were no nuclear power plants and no national high- way system. The government organization table contained no EPA, OSHA, NIH, or dozens of other now familiar institutions. The relationship of the federal government to the citizens it serves became vastly broader and deeper with each passing decade. Social programs are by far the largest component of a federal budget that now amounts to over one-fifth of the gross national product. National security and foreign policy issues, the environment, protection of human rights, health care, the economy, and questions of financial regulation dominate most of the national agenda. Something less tangible, but alarming, has also happened over the last 50 years. Trust in govern- ment — strong after World War II, with the United States assuming international leadership and meeting domestic challenges — has eroded. Government’s responsiveness, its efficiency, and too often its honesty are broadly challenged as we enter a new century.
    [Show full text]