Perceptions of War

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Perceptions of War PERCEPTIONS OF WAR By CHRISTINE OLDFIELD B.A., University of Alberta, 2003 A thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF ARTS In HUMAN SECURITY AND PEACEBUILDING We accept this thesis as conforming to the required standard. ______ Susan Brown Academic Supervisor ______ Alejandro Palacios Academic Lead, MA Human Security and Peacebuilding ______ Dr. Gregory Cran, Director School of Conflict and Peace Management ROYAL ROADS UNIVERSITY November 2008 © Christine Oldfield, 2008 ISBN:978-0-494-50421-5 Perceptions of War 2 Abstract The objective of this research is to examine governmental messaging during times of international conflict, specifically Canada’s mission in Afghanistan, as it relates to public perception. This paper will test the effectiveness of government messaging during a specific time of high-risk international deployment. The first section is a quantitative analysis from the various forms of public feedback. In order to measure the public’s responses to messaging, comparisons of the responses before and after the government’s release of a message have been evaluated. The second section comprises of a qualitative analysis to determine the correlation, if any, between the results from the public feedback and the government messaging. It is hoped that the findings of this research will contribute to an understanding of how messaging can be used to influence the public’s views and confidence, particularly if is related to a high risk and possibly unpopular activity. Perceptions of War 3 TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTER ONE: PROJECT OVERVIEW …………………………………………04 Purpose of Project.................................................................................................04 Overview………………………………………………………………………08 CHAPTER TWO: LITERATURE REVIEW………………………………………...09 CHAPTER THREE: PROCESSES AND METHODOLOGIES……………………13 Research Methods………………………………………………………………13 Design Model……………………………………………………………………14 CHAPTER FOUR: THREE PHASES………………………………………………...15 Phase One: Operation Enduring Freedom……………………………………………15 Global Security and the War on Terror………………………………………..15 Canada’s Initial Response………………………………………………………16 Canada’s Out of Iraq……………………………………………………………22 Phase Two: International Security Assistance Force…………………………………28 Canada’s Lead in ISAF…………………………………………………………29 Canada to Kandahar: Paul Martin’s Decision…………………………………31 The 3D Approach………………………………………………………………..36 Phase Three: Kandahar………………………………………………………………...39 Task Force Afghanistan…………………………………………………………43 Move to a Conservative Government……………………………………………46 Stephen Harper’s Campaign for Support……………………………………….48 Debating Afghanistan…………………………………………………………...50 Mission Clarification……………………………………………………………54 Humanitarian Values……………………………………………………………55 Language Critics………………………..……………………………………….58 Proposed Extension……………………………………………………………...60 Message Clarification…………………………………………………………....62 Perceptions of War 4 CHAPTER FIVE: A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF RESPONSES…………….66 Initial Reactions………………………………………………………………….66 Mid-Term Reaction……………………………………………………………...68 Current Reactions………………………………………………………………..69 Trend analysis of public perceptions……………………………………………70 CHAPTER SIX: CONCLUSIONS ……………………………………………………72 REFERENCES………………………………………………………………………….76 APPENDICES…………………………………………………………………………..81 TIMELINE………………………………………………………………………………90 Perceptions of War 5 CHAPTER ONE Project Overview Purpose of Project The purpose of this study is to contribute to an understanding of whether the messaging used during times of international conflict has the capability to influence the public’s views and confidence, particularly if is related to high risk and possibly unpopular activities. Canada made the decision on October 7, 2001 to contribute to the international forces in the campaign against terrorism. Jean Chretien made the announcement to deploy the Canadian Forces (CF) as an alliance member in support of the United States, laying the foundation for Canada’s principal theatre of operations in the wider US-led "global war on terror." Canada’s commitment would begin rather modestly in the relatively safe area of Kabul, but would be severely tested with the CF transfer to Kandahar. Kandahar is a country that appears caught up in a complex stability operation that combines elements of counter insurgency and reconstruction in what Sean Maloney has described as a "post-Apocalyptical environment in the wake of ... a twenty-five year 'civil war'." The move to Kandahar transformed Canada’s involvement into a long term commitment to a post-conflict reconstruction combined with counterinsurgency warfare. Not only is the Afghanistan mission Canada’s largest troop deployment since the Korean War, Afghanistan is Canada’s single largest recipient of aid funding, and the initiative has also spanned the terms of three Prime Ministers. Government justification for the mission varied depending on the party in power and events on the ground, however, all three Perceptions of War 6 governments stressed that Canada’s mission would secure national interests and project humanitarian values; however, the first priority for all governments in addressing this crisis has been to protect the safety and security of Canadians. Over the course of the mission, Canada’s involvement gradually moved towards reconstruction efforts, both by providing military assistance towards stabilization and securing the country and by increasing the development funding distributed. Canada was one of 51 countries committed to the 2006 Afghanistan Compact, a comprehensive international program of aid to Afghanistan’s security, governance and development. For the years 2002-2011, Canada has authorized $1.2 billion in international assistance to Afghanistan. That country now receives more Canadian aid than any other, about 3% of all Canadian aid during the period under review. Furthermore, events in Afghanistan, and the expected outcomes, was seen to directly affect Canada’s security, its reputation in the world, and its future ability to engage the international community in achieving objectives of peace, security and shared prosperity. Informed and fair-minded Canadians may have differed on the policy choices before them, but, none doubted that the future of Afghanistan mattered to Canada for either security or humanitarian motives. Various justifications for Canada’s involvement in Afghanistan have been offered to the public. “Afghanistan has been depicted as an exercise in national security, the fulfillment of multilateral obligations, a humanitarian mission, and an attempt to rebuild a failed and fragile country.” After the 2008 external panel review of Canada’s mission in Afghanistan, Deputy Prime Minister John Manley affirmed: “While public support for Canadian troops is strong, Canadians have been uncertain about Canada’s evolving mission in Afghanistan. To put things bluntly, Governments from the start of Canada’s Afghan involvement have Perceptions of War 7 failed to communicate with Canadians with balance and candour about the reasons for Canadian involvement, or about the risks, difficulties and expected results of that involvement. Almost the only Government accounts that Canadians have received have come from the Department of National Defence. Important issues of Canadian diplomacy and aid in Afghanistan have scarcely been acknowledged and seldom asserted in public by ministers or officials responsible.” There was a small, although important, percentage of Canadians who oppose participation in any form of conflict because of a philosophical objection to the use of armed force however, amongst this small percentage are those who would also support participation in traditional peacekeeping. There are those who support traditional or more "robust" peacekeeping, but only if authorized directly by the United Nations. There are those who support non-UN peacekeeping coalitions or regional bodies (including NATO), if the objective is to address a significant humanitarian disaster, such as in Kosovo or Sudan. These are all significant moral, legal and practical factors affecting how Canadians have approached the legitimacy of conflict participation and resolution.1 The task of managing the public’s perception and maintaining public support for government initiatives in Afghanistan has been complicated by the apparent lack of clarity about Canada’s motives, coupled with the variety of motivations and tolerance levels of Canadians for involvement in high risk, military operations undoubtedly complicated. The Canadian military deployment to Afghanistan developed into three phases: from October 2001 to August 2003 as part of Operation Enduring Freedom (OEF), from September 2003 to August 2005 as part of the International Security Assistance Force 1 Collins, Robin, POLLING THE AFGHANISTAN INTERVENTION QUESTION IN AID OF POLICY-MAKING. July 16,2007 Retrieved at http://www.igloo.org/shortpieces/pollingt . Perceptions of War 8 (ISAF) mission in Kabul, and from August 2005 to present in Kandahar province in an integrated approach known as the Provincial Reconstruction Team (PRT) in Kandahar. Each of these quite different stages will be assessed within the broader context of three respective overarching missions: Operation Enduring Freedom (OEF), North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO)/International Security Assistance Force (ISAF) and the Provincial Reconstruction Team (PRT) in Kandahar. The objective of this research is to examine governmental messaging during times of international
Recommended publications
  • Journaux Journals
    HOUSE OF COMMONS OF CANADA CHAMBRE DES COMMUNES DU CANADA 37th PARLIAMENT, 1st SESSION 37e LÉGISLATURE, 1re SESSION Journals Journaux No. 12 No 12 Tuesday, February 13, 2001 Le mardi 13 février 2001 10:00 a.m. 10 heures The Clerk informed the House of the unavoidable absence of the Le Greffier informe la Chambre de l’absence inévitable du Speaker. Président. Whereupon, Mr. Kilger (Stormont — Dundas — Charlotten- Sur ce, M. Kilger (Stormont — Dundas — Charlottenburgh), burgh), Deputy Speaker and Chairman of Committees of the Vice–président et président des Comités pléniers, assume la Whole, took the Chair, pursuant to subsection 43(1) of the présidence, conformément au paragraphe 43(1) de la Loi sur le Parliament of Canada Act. Parlement du Canada. PRAYERS PRIÈRE DAILY ROUTINE OF BUSINESS AFFAIRES COURANTES ORDINAIRES PRESENTING REPORTS FROM COMMITTEES PRÉSENTATION DE RAPPORTS DE COMITÉS Mr. Lee (Parliamentary Secretary to the Leader of the M. Lee (secrétaire parlementaire du leader du gouvernement à la Government in the House of Commons), from the Standing Chambre des communes), du Comité permanent de la procédure et Committee on Procedure and House Affairs, presented the des affaires de la Chambre, présente le 1er rapport de ce Comité, 1st Report of the Committee, which was as follows: dont voici le texte : The Committee recommends, pursuant to Standing Orders 104 Votre Comité recommande, conformément au mandat que lui and 114, that the list of members and associate members for confèrent les articles 104 et 114 du Règlement, que la liste
    [Show full text]
  • Canada, the Us and Cuba
    CANADA, THE US AND CUBA CANADA, THE US AND CUBA HELMS-BURTON AND ITS AFTERMATH Edited by Heather N. Nicol Centre for International Relations, Queen’s University Kingston, Ontario, Canada 1999 Canadian Cataloguing in Publication Data Main entry under title: Canada, the US and Cuba : Helms-Burton and its aftermath (Martello papers, ISSN 1183-3661 ; 21) Includes bibliographical references. ISBN 0-88911-884-1 1. United States. Cuban Liberty and Democratic Solidarity (LIBERTAD) Act of 1996. 2. Canada – Foreign relations – Cuba. 3. Cuba – Foreign relations – Canada. 4. Canada – Foreign relations – United States. 5. United States – Foreign relations – Canada. 6. United States – Foreign relations – Cuba. 7. Cuba – Foreign relations – United States. I. Nicol, Heather N. (Heather Nora), 1953- . II. Queen’s University (Kingston, Ont.). Centre for International Relations. III. Series. FC602.C335 1999 327.71 C99-932101-3 F1034.2.C318 1999 © Copyright 1999 The Martello Papers The Queen’s University Centre for International Relations (QCIR) is pleased to present the twenty-first in its series of security studies, the Martello Papers. Taking their name from the distinctive towers built during the nineteenth century to de- fend Kingston, Ontario, these papers cover a wide range of topics and issues rele- vant to contemporary international strategic relations. This volume presents a collection of insightful essays on the often uneasy but always interesting United States-Cuba-Canada triangle. Seemingly a relic of the Cold War, it is a topic that, as editor Heather Nicol observes, “is always with us,” and indeed is likely to be of greater concern as the post-Cold War era enters its second decade.
    [Show full text]
  • Canada Can't Hide Behind NATO in Refusal to Sign Treaty on Nuclear Weapons Prohibition
    Canada can’t hide behind NATO in refusal to sign treaty on nuclear weapons prohibition By DOUGLAS ROCHE SEPTEMBER 21, 2020 Justin Trudeau has not yet learned how NATO contravenes the basic idea of nuclear disarmament, for he called the negotiations that led to the adoption of the Prohibition Treaty ‘useless.' Lloyd Axworthy, Jean Chrétien, Bill Graham, John McCallum, John Manley, and John Turner all signed an open letter, released on Sept. 21, that features 53 former high officials of NATO countries expressing support for the Treaty on the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons. It is an astonishing rebuke of NATO’s moribund policies on nuclear weapons, and the most serious challenge to NATO’s nuclear orthodoxy in the organization’s 71-year history. Even two former NATO secretaries-general, Javier Solana and Willy Claes, as well as former UN secretary-general Ban Ki-moon, joined in this protest. The Hill Times photographs by Andrew Meade and Hill Times file photographs EDMONTON—Lloyd Axworthy, Jean-Jacques Blais, Jean Chrétien, Bill Graham, John McCallum, John Manley, and John Turner. These seven names hardly need an introduction to readers of The Hill Times, and certainly not to the Government of Canada. Two of them are former prime ministers, three are former foreign ministers, and two are former defence ministers, who ran and served Liberal governments. All of them signed an open letter, released on Sept. 21, that features 53 former high officials of NATO countries expressing support for the Treaty on the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons. It is an astonishing rebuke of NATO’s moribund policies on nuclear weapons, and the most serious challenge to NATO’s nuclear orthodoxy in the organization’s 71-year history.
    [Show full text]
  • Fall 2017 Volume 30 Issue 3
    Fall 2017 Volume 30 Issue 3 Happy Holidays Heritage Mississauga’s Newsletter Contributors in this issue Inside . President’s Message / 3 The Editor’s Desk / 4 Vimy Park /4 CF-100 Canuck / 5 What Did You Bring? / 6 Don Marjorie Greg Thompson’s Company / 7 Jayme Meghan Barbara Hancock Hancock Carraro Haunted Mississauga / 7 Gaspar Mackintosh O’Neil Programs Plus / 8 the Credits / 9 Staff Contacts The Pines / 10 Jayme Gaspar: x 31 [email protected] Centennial Torch / 11 Meghan Mackintosh: x 23 [email protected] Confederation Caravan / 11 Jenny Walker: x 22 [email protected] Queen of the Township / 12 Kelly Ralston: x 0 [email protected] W. P. Howland / 13 Matthew Wilkinson: x 29 [email protected] Centennial Flag / 14 Kelly Jenny Remembering Dieppe / 14 Ralston Walker Heritage Matters / 16 NEXT DEADLINE January 19, 2018 Watch our Editor: latest video! Jayme Gaspar, Executive Director Content “This is Dundas Street” can be found on our Meghan Mackintosh, Outreach Matthew Linda YouTube channel: Coordinator, Matthew Wilkinson, Wilkinson Yao Historian www.YouTube.com/HeritageMississauga Layout & Typesetting Jayme Gaspar HERITAGE NEWS is a publication of the Mississauga Heritage Foundation Inc. The Foundation Photography (est. 1960) is a not-for-profit organization which identifies, researches, interprets, promotes, and Ancesty.ca, Councillor Carolyn encourages awareness of the diverse heritage resources relating to the city of Mississauga. The Parrish, Hancock Family, Heritage
    [Show full text]
  • Alternative North Americas: What Canada and The
    ALTERNATIVE NORTH AMERICAS What Canada and the United States Can Learn from Each Other David T. Jones ALTERNATIVE NORTH AMERICAS Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars One Woodrow Wilson Plaza 1300 Pennsylvania Avenue NW Washington, D.C. 20004 Copyright © 2014 by David T. Jones All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced, scanned, or distributed in any printed or electronic form without permission. Please do not participate in or encourage piracy of copyrighted materials in violation of author’s rights. Published online. ISBN: 978-1-938027-36-9 DEDICATION Once more for Teresa The be and end of it all A Journey of Ten Thousand Years Begins with a Single Day (Forever Tandem) TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction .................................................................................................................1 Chapter 1 Borders—Open Borders and Closing Threats .......................................... 12 Chapter 2 Unsettled Boundaries—That Not Yet Settled Border ................................ 24 Chapter 3 Arctic Sovereignty—Arctic Antics ............................................................. 45 Chapter 4 Immigrants and Refugees .........................................................................54 Chapter 5 Crime and (Lack of) Punishment .............................................................. 78 Chapter 6 Human Rights and Wrongs .................................................................... 102 Chapter 7 Language and Discord ..........................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Foundation for the Study of the Processes of Government in Canada Annual Report 2015-2016
    FOUNDATION FOR THE STUDY OF THE PROCESSES OF GOVERNMENT IN CANADA ANNUAL REPORT 2015-2016 FORUM.CA Message from the Governor General the Governor from Message 2 Forum for Young Canadians Message from the Minister of Canadian Heritage the Minister from Message Annual Report 2015-2016 3 Message from the Chair from Message With total confidence, I can state that the 40th year of several reasons for this. Was it the wave of fresh- Forum for Young Canadians was a complete success. ness of a new government? The direct involvement In my message last year I said that, for this 40th anni- of many former participants? The record partici- versary, we would have to celebrate our history while pation of Members of Parliament in our sessions? also building for our future. One year later, the future The huge number of applicants, which exceeded is bright! At its inception, the Foundation adopted a all expectations? These successes are certainly formula: To bring together interested and engaged due to the combination of all of our efforts, for young people from across Canada to participate in an which we are proud and very grateful. This year, informative and constructive study of their national 337 students from across the country made their institutions. Our experience since then has shown that way to Ottawa to network, learn about politics this is a successful format. The obvious value of the and government, and make their voices heard in a Foundation’s programs has drawn enthusiastic finan- positive and safe environment. cial, moral and intellectual support from all sectors: Public Service, politics, academia and business.
    [Show full text]
  • Vimy Speech November 3, 2017 Honourable William C
    1 VIMY SPEECH [Check against delivery] NOVEMBER 3, 2017 HONOURABLE WILLIAM C. GRAHAM, P.C., C.M., Q.C. Acknowledge: Chief Justice; Excellencies; Minister Brison; Members of Parliament; Senators; C.D.S. Vance and Military; Distinguished Guests; Ladies and Gentlemen. Thank you, Gen. Gosselin, for that kind introduction. I am deeply honoured by this award. As I look around the room and see so many of my predecessors: Gen. Ray Henault; Gen. Paul Manson; Gen. Jonathan Vance; Hon. Col. Blake Goldring; Admiral Murray. I am humbled to be in their company. But I am sure they would agree with me when I say that it is even more humbling to be at this event which brings together so many distinguished Canadians. So many military personnel and civilians who devote their professional competence to the cause of defence and security of our country and its capacity to help bring order and stability to troubled places in this world. Having served as both Foreign and Defence Ministers of this great country, it is particularly gratifying for me to be the recipient of an award that is associated with that feat of arms that signaled our country’s transition from 2 a colonial dependency to a nation capable of shaping world events. Vimy is emblematic of that golden thread that unites the sacrifices of our men and women in uniform with the place of honour that Canada occupies on the global stage. As my colleague, John McCallum and I often repeated to one another: “Defence may be derivative of Foreign Policy but Foreign Policy is dependent on defence.” It was, as you pointed out, Sir, my great privilege to serve in the parliament of Canada for some thirteen years.
    [Show full text]
  • Council Minutes – April 8, 2009
    MINUTES SESSION 7 THE COUNCIL OF THE CORPORATION OF THE CITY OF MISSISSAUGA (www.mississauga.ca ) WEDNESDAY, APRIL 8, 2009, 9:00 A. M. COUNCIL CHAMBER 300 CITY CENTRE DRIVE MISSISSAUGA, ONTARIO L5B 3C1 INDEX 1. CALL TO ORDER 1 2. DISCLOSURES OF PECUNIARY INTEREST 1 3. MINUTES OF PREVIOUS COUNCIL MEETINGS 1 4. APPROVAL OF THE AGENDA 2 5. PRESENTATIONS 2 6. DEPUTATIONS 6 7. PUBLIC QUESTION PERIOD 12 8. CORPORATE REPORTS 13 9. COMMITTEE REPORTS 18 10. UNFINISHED BUSINESS 49 11. PETITIONS 51 12. CORRESPONDENCE 51 13. RESOLUTIONS 61 14. BY-LAWS 71 15. OTHER BUSINESS 75 16. INQUIRIES 75 17. NOTICES OF MOTION 76 18. CLOSED SESSION 78 19. CONFIRMATORY BY-LAW 79 20. ADJOURNMENT 79 Council - 1 - April 8 2009 PRESENT: Mayor Hazel McCallion Councillor Carmen Corbasson Ward 1 Councillor Pat Mullin Ward 2 Councillor Maja Prentice Ward 3 Councillor Frank Dale Ward 4 Councillor Eve Adams Ward 5 Councillor Carolyn Parrish Ward 6 Councillor Katie Mahoney Ward 8 Councillor Sue McFadden Ward 10 Councillor George Carlson Ward 11 ABSENT: Councillor Nando Iannicca Ward 7 Councillor Pat Saito Ward 9 STAFF: Janice Baker, City Manager and Chief Administrative Officer Martin Powell, Commissioner of Transportation and Works Brenda Breault, Commissioner of Corporate Services and Treasurer Paul Mitcham, Commissioner of Community Services Ed Sajecki, Commissioner of Planning and Building Mary Ellen Bench, City Solicitor Crystal Greer, City Clerk Shalini Alleluia, Legislative Coordinator Evelyn Eichenbaum, Legislative Coordinator 1. CALL TO ORDER The meeting was called to order at 9:10 a.m. by Mayor Hazel McCallion, with the saying of the Lord’s Prayer.
    [Show full text]
  • The Honourable John Mccallum P.C., M.P. Minister of Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship the House of Commons Ottawa Ontario K1A 0A6
    The Honourable John McCallum P.C., M.P. Minister of Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship The House of Commons Ottawa Ontario K1A 0A6 December 16, 2015 Minister McCallum: We write to extend our congratulations on your appointment as Minister of Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship and, indeed, to offer our commitment to you to be constructive partners in the fulfillment of your important mandate. World Renew is a Sponsorship Agreement Holder (SAH) and has worked with our Church congregations across the country to offer welcoming community to migrants since the 1970s. We are eager to continue this important work of hospitality and justice in the face of the worst Refugee crisis since the Second World War. Therefore, we are pleased that your government has made an energetic and urgent commitment to settle Syrian Refugees. This symbolic and substantive effort is, we hope, only the beginning of a renewed trend in Canadian Refugee policy to welcome and enfold vulnerable migrants from around the world into the mosaic that is Canada. Persistent and energetic commitment to addressing the global refugee crisis (Middle East, Central Asia, East and Central Africa) is both a matter of fundamental justice and a wonderful opportunity for Canada. We note with appreciation the Prime Minister’s mandate letter to you as Minister. In the last Parliament we, along with partners in refugee justice work, regularly expressed concerns about designated country of origin; the interim federal health program; and meaningful consultations with SAHs and related stakeholders. Your mandate letter gives us hope and confidence for productive public dialogue on these matters.
    [Show full text]
  • Replacing the Cf-18 Hornet: Unmanned Combat Aerial Vehicle Or Joint Strike Fighter?
    TECHNOLOGY DND photo The 20th anniversary of the CF-18 Hornet occurred in 2002. In 2017, it will have served Canada for 35 years, and will thus be one of the oldest serving fighter aircraft in the world. REPLACING THE CF-18 HORNET: UNMANNED COMBAT AERIAL VEHICLE OR JOINT STRIKE FIGHTER? by Lieutenant-Colonel Carl Doyon, CD “[We must be] guided by new fiscal, technological In June 2003, Thierry Gongora, a Department of and strategic realities” National Defence analyst, published a paper in which he presented a dozen options that the government could – The Honourable John McCallum, consider in replacing the CF-18.2 Gongora concluded: 2003-2004 Report on Plans and Priorities “We cannot assume that the follow-on system needs to be necessarily another multi-role fighter... We can The Available Choices no longer assume that the only viable alternative to a manned multi-role fighter is another one.”3 Elinor Sloan, n May 2001, Art Eggleton, at the time Canada’s Minister a professor attached to the National Defence Headquarters I of National Defence, announced a $1.2-billion program to Directorate of Strategic Analysis, observes in a report, modernize the avionics of the CF-18 and thus to prolong its “It may make more sense for the Air Force to focus useful life until 2017-2020. This measure effectively delayed on... stealth Unmanned Combat Aerial Vehicles, the difficult decision with respect to replacing the aircraft. which might better be able to carry out many of the According to Jason Kirby, an editor at Canadian Business: missions currently performed by tactical air forces.”4 “DND insiders..
    [Show full text]
  • The Canadian "Garrison Mentality" and Anti-Americanism at The
    STUDIES IN DEFENCE & FOREIGN POLICYNumber 4 / May 2005 The Canadian “Garrison Mentality” and Anti-Americanism at the CBC Lydia Miljan and Barry Cooper Calgary Policy Research Centre, The Fraser Institute Contents Executive summary . A Garrison Mentality . 3 Anti-American Sentiment at “The National” . 8 References . 7 About the Authors & Acknowledgments . 9 A FRASER INSTITUTE OCCASIONAL PAPER Studies in Defence and Foreign Policy are published periodically throughout the year by The Fraser Institute. The Fraser Institute is an independent Canadian economic and social research and educational organization. It has as its objective the redirection of public attention to the role of competitive markets in providing for the well-being of Canadians. Where markets work, the Institute’s interest lies in trying to discover prospects for improvement. Where markets do not work, its interest lies in finding the reasons. Where competitive markets have been replaced by government control, the interest of the Institute lies in documenting objectively the nature of the improvement or deterioration resulting from government intervention. The work of the Institute is assisted by an Editorial Advisory Board of internationally renowned economists. The Institute enjoys registered charitable status in both Canada and the United States and is funded entirely by the tax-deductible contributions of its supporters, sales of its publications, and revenue from events. To order additional copies of Studies in Defence and Foreign Policy, any of our other publications, or a catalogue of the Institute’s publications, please contact the publications coordinator via our toll-free order line: .800.665.3558, ext. 580; via telephone: 604.688.022, ext.
    [Show full text]
  • Table of Contents
    TABLE OF CONTENTS THE CHRETIEN LEGACY Introduction .................................................. i The Chr6tien Legacy R eg W hitaker ........................................... 1 Jean Chr6tien's Quebec Legacy: Coasting Then Stickhandling Hard Robert Y oung .......................................... 31 The Urban Legacy of Jean Chr6tien Caroline Andrew ....................................... 53 Chr6tien and North America: Between Integration and Autonomy Christina Gabriel and Laura Macdonald ..................... 71 Jean Chr6tien's Continental Legacy: From Commitment to Confusion Stephen Clarkson and Erick Lachapelle ..................... 93 A Passive Internationalist: Jean Chr6tien and Canadian Foreign Policy Tom K eating ......................................... 115 Prime Minister Jean Chr6tien's Immigration Legacy: Continuity and Transformation Yasmeen Abu-Laban ................................... 133 Renewing the Relationship With Aboriginal Peoples? M ichael M urphy ....................................... 151 The Chr~tien Legacy and Women: Changing Policy Priorities With Little Cause for Celebration Alexandra Dobrowolsky ................................ 171 Le Petit Vision, Les Grands Decisions: Chr~tien's Paradoxical Record in Social Policy M ichael J. Prince ...................................... 199 The Chr~tien Non-Legacy: The Federal Role in Health Care Ten Years On ... 1993-2003 Gerard W . Boychuk .................................... 221 The Chr~tien Ethics Legacy Ian G reene ..........................................
    [Show full text]