Updated Ripley Area Profile
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Download Original Attachment
Owner Name Address Postcode Current Rv THE OWNER TREETOP WORKSHOP THE BOTTOM YARD HORSLEY LN/DERBY RD COXBENCH DERBY DE21 5BD 1950 THE OWNER YEW TREE INN YEW TREE HILL HOLLOWAY MATLOCK, DERBYSHIRE DE4 5AR 3000 THE OWNER THE OLD BAKEHOUSE THE COMMON CRICH MATLOCK, DERBYSHIRE DE4 5BH 4600 THE OWNER ROOM 3 SECOND FLOOR VICTORIA HOUSE THE COMMON, CRICH MATLOCK, DERBYSHIRE DE4 5BH 1150 THE OWNER ROOM 2 SECOND FLOOR VICTORIA HOUSE THE COMMON CRICH MATLOCK, DERBYSHIRE DE4 5BH 800 THE OWNER WORKSHOP SUN LANE CRICH MATLOCK, DERBYSHIRE DE4 5BR 2600 THE OWNER JOVIAL DUTCHMAN THE CROSS CRICH MATLOCK, DERBYSHIRE DE4 5DH 3500 THE OWNER SPRINGFIELDS LEA MAIN ROAD LEA MATLOCK, DERBYSHIRE DE4 5GJ 1275 SLEEKMEAD PROPERTY COMPANY LTD PRIMROSE COTTAGE POTTERS HILL WHEATCROFT MATLOCK DERBYSHIRE DE4 5PH 1400 SLEEKMEAD PROPERTY COMPANY LTD PLAISTOW HALL FARM POTTERS HILL WHEATCROFT MATLOCK DERBYSHIRE DE4 5PH 1400 THE OWNER R/O 47 OXFORD STREET RIPLEY DERBYSHIRE DE5 3AG 2950 MACNEEL & PARTNERS LTD 53 OXFORD STREET RIPLEY DERBYSHIRE DE5 3AH 19000 MACNEEL & PARTNERS LTD OVER 53-57 OXFORD STREET (2399) RIPLEY DERBYSHIRE DE5 3AH 5000 THE OWNER 43A OXFORD STREET RIPLEY DERBYSHIRE DE5 3AH 2475 THE OWNER OXFORD CHAMBERS 41 OXFORD STREET RIPLEY DERBYSHIRE DE5 3AH 2800 THE OWNER OVER 4B OXFORD STREET RIPLEY DERBYSHIRE DE5 3AL 710 THE OWNER 3 WELL STREET RIPLEY DERBYSHIRE DE5 3AR 4550 LOCKWOOD PROPERTIES LTD DE JA VU 23 NOTTINGHAM ROAD RIPLEY DERBYSHIRE DE5 3AS 19500 THE OWNER REAR OF 94 NOTTINGHAM ROAD RIPLEY DERBYSHIRE DE5 3AX 1975 THE OWNER UNIT G PROSPECT COURT 192 -
Derwent Valley Line
Prices correct at November 2018 November at correct Prices (Newark) – Nottingham – Derby – Matlock – Derby – Nottingham – (Newark) derbyshire.gov.uk/bline long as one end of your journey is in Derbyshire. in is journey your of end one as long © Matt Jones Matt © . Receive 25% off local train fares as as fares train local off 25% Receive 01629 533190 01629 Derbyshire Call Derbyshire b_line Card Holders Holders Card b_line Derbyshire This publication is available in other formats from from formats other in available is publication This most local bus services (Wayfarer cannot be purchased on the train). the on purchased be cannot (Wayfarer services bus local most eastmidlandstrains.co.uk/derwentvalleyline and other staffed stations, from Tourist Information Centres and on on and Centres Information Tourist from stations, staffed other and 01629 538062 538062 01629 for seniors or child. Tickets can be purchased at Derby, Long Eaton Eaton Long Derby, at purchased be can Tickets child. or seniors for Hall Matlock DE4 3AG. 3AG. DE4 Matlock Hall except on Sundays. Adult tickets £13.00 including one child, £6.50 £6.50 child, one including £13.00 tickets Adult Sundays. on except Council, Economy, Transport and Communities Department, County County Department, Communities and Transport Economy, Council, travel before 0900 Monday to Saturday or on the Transpeak bus bus Transpeak the on or Saturday to Monday 0900 before travel Derwent Valley Line Community Rail Partnership, Derbyshire County County Derbyshire Partnership, Rail Community Line Valley Derwent train services in Derbyshire and the Peak District. Not valid for rail rail for valid Not District. Peak the and Derbyshire in services train day rover tickets are valid on most bus and and bus most on valid are tickets rover day Derbyshire Wayfarer Derbyshire tourism and railway organisations. -
Midlands Regional Alliance Newsletter
Midlands Regional Alliance Newsletter League Results: LEAGUE NEWS - NOV 16 Doe Lea AFC 5-2 Matlock Town CFA With County Cup action badly affected by bad weather over the past two Ambergate 3-0 Shirebrook Rangers Res weeks, the Derbyshire County FA Junior Cup draws for the North and South Punjab United 3-1 Real Medina section were finally completed and here is the run down of the draw: North Ripley Town Res 2-3 Sherwin Res Grindleford vs Rowsley 86 Res Willington Sports 1-2 Little Eaton Dev Dronfield Woodhouse Sport & Social vs Chesterfield Town Bradwell Sports Res vs Wirksworth Ivanhoe Res OR Tideswell United League Postponements South Allestree vs Bestwood Miners Welfare Little Eaton Development vs Ambergate Tibshelf vs Cromford On Saturday, November 14, MRA chairman Mel Williams picked up his FA Sherwin vs Newhall United Res Long Service Award down at the home of Sandiacre Town in front of a Matlock United vs Ripley Town crowd of around 70 people including friends, family, the Sandiacre first team and committee members of the MRA. LEAGUE GOALS - 22 Press Officer for Content, Craig Gibbons, has written a press article which CUP GOALS - 43 is to be published in the Nottingham Post and Mansfield & Ashfield Chad next week so keep your eyes out for the story. Derbyshire FA County WEEKEND ROUNDUP Cup Results DERBYSHIRE Divisional Cup North action sees tournament following their 3-2 loss to Gresley Junior Cup North Wirksworth Town reclaim the bragging rights after Reserves. Rowsley 86 Res 2 they avenged their 3-2 league defeat with a 4-3 Gresley found themselves 3-0 up by half-time but Dove Holes Res 1 victory over Wirksworth Ivanhoe to move into the second-half goals from Jack Goodband and Tom Wirksworth Town Res 3 next round. -
New Winnings Court
IMMEDIATELY AVAILABLE NEW WINNINGS COURT DENBY . DERBYSHIRE . DE5 8NN HIGH QUALITY OFFICES TO LET / FOR SALE Offices available from 1,350 – 5,430 sq ft (125 – 504 sq m) Prestigious new office development on established Business Park Excellent access to the A38/A61 Approx 9 miles to the North of Derby City centre, 2 miles south of Ripley town centre & 1/2 mile to Denby Pottery Village Secure modern Business Park Generous car parking on site FLEXIBLE TERMS AVAILABLE SPECIFICATION Offices have been built to a high specification, to include the following: Air conditioning WC’s on each floor Raised access floors High speed lifts and DDA compliant access Brick and feature stonework High speed broadband available Generous car parking Buildings may be available on a 360° Carpeted throughout floor by floor basis 360° iMAGES Recessed LED lighting Expansion land available ACCOMMODATION New Winnings Court is a prestigious new office development and comprises6 high quality OFFICE 1 12 Parking Spaces OFFICE 4 12 Parking Spaces office buildings situated to the front of the successful Denby Hall Business Park. Buildings are now available for immediate occupation. Approximate Net Internal areas as follows. OFFICE 2 12 Parking Spaces OFFICE 5 18 Parking Spaces Floor plans are available on request. OFFICE 3 12 Parking Spaces OFFICE 6 9 Parking Spaces GROUND FLOOR FIRST FLOOR TOTAL 1 1,358 sq ft (126.15 m2) 1,358 sq ft (126.15 m2) 2,716 sq ft (252.29 m2) 12 34 2 1,358 sq ft (126.15 m2) 1,358 sq ft (126.15 m2) 2,716 sq ft (252.29 m2) first floor 5 3 1,358 sq ft (126.15 m2) 1,358FIRST sq ftFLOOR (126.15 LET m2) 2,716 sq ft (252.29 m2) LET 4 1,358 sq ft (126.15 m2) 1,358 sq ft (126.15 m2) 2,716 sq ft (252.29 m2) 5 2,173 sq ft (201.84 m2) 2,173 sq ft (201.84 m2) 4,346 sq ft (403.69 m2) 6 6 972 sq ft (90.33 m2) LET 972 sq ft (90.33 m2) 1,944 sq ft (180.65 m2) LET There is a development site of approx. -
Land at Blacksmith's Arms
Land off North Road, Glossop Education Impact Assessment Report v1-4 (Initial Research Feedback) for Gladman Developments 12th June 2013 Report by Oliver Nicholson EPDS Consultants Conifers House Blounts Court Road Peppard Common Henley-on-Thames RG9 5HB 0118 978 0091 www.epds-consultants.co.uk 1. Introduction 1.1.1. EPDS Consultants has been asked to consider the proposed development for its likely impact on schools in the local area. 1.2. Report Purpose & Scope 1.2.1. The purpose of this report is to act as a principle point of reference for future discussions with the relevant local authority to assist in the negotiation of potential education-specific Section 106 agreements pertaining to this site. This initial report includes an analysis of the development with regards to its likely impact on local primary and secondary school places. 1.3. Intended Audience 1.3.1. The intended audience is the client, Gladman Developments, and may be shared with other interested parties, such as the local authority(ies) and schools in the area local to the proposed development. 1.4. Research Sources 1.4.1. The contents of this initial report are based on publicly available information, including relevant data from central government and the local authority. 1.5. Further Research & Analysis 1.5.1. Further research may be conducted after this initial report, if required by the client, to include a deeper analysis of the local position regarding education provision. This activity may include negotiation with the relevant local authority and the possible submission of Freedom of Information requests if required. -
Minutes 20170718
ALDERWASLEY PARISH COUNCIL Minutes of the Meeting of the Parish Council held on Tuesday 18 July 2017 in St Margaret’s Hall, Alderwasley Present: Mrs H Wordley in the Chair, Mr K MacArthur, Mr K Matkin, Cllr Taylor and Clerk 12/17 Apologies for Absence Apologies were received and accepted from Mr D Deaville (illness), Mrs R Spendlove (holiday) and Mr H Oulton (holiday) 13/17 Declarations of Members’ Interests Councillor Wordley declared a personal interest in minute number 17/17(e) as the application was on land adjacent to her own land 14/17 Public Speaking Councillor Taylor reported that he had been informed that bases were being installed at Haytop Caravan Park and the enforcement Officer would react when the structures were erected. He said that AVBC are still in pursuit of the court case with the owners of Haytop regarding the recent breach of the injunction. He said that there had been some installations of containers and caravans on land at Palerow Lane and thought the area came inside the Parish boundary. Members asked him to get confirmation that this area was in the Parish 15/17 Minutes of the meeting held on 16 May 2017 RESOLVED to approve the minutes of the meeting held on 16 May 2017 and they were signed by the Chair as a true record. 16/17 Clerk’s report (a) Cemetery inspection – The annual inspection was carried prior to the meeting. RESOLVED to ask Mr Hodson to close trim the ivy on the wall next to the Holly hedge with a hedge trimmer and for Councillor Matkin to weed kill the path and the top end of the wall (b) Cemetery – (i) Review of the rules – RESOLVED to make no amendments (ii) Fees – RESOLVED to make no increases (c) Public speaking policy – Members considered the draft policy. -
Ambergate – Flood Risk Information and Faqs
Ambergate – Flood Risk Information and FAQs 1. Which organisation is responsible for my stretch of river? Environment Agency The Environment Agency carries out maintenance, improvement or construction work on main rivers to manage flood risk. We are also responsible for working in partnership with the Met Office to provide flood forecasts and warnings. The main river map (link below) shows which rivers are designated as ‘main rivers’. In Ambergate, the River Derwent and River Amber are main rivers. Other rivers are called ‘ordinary watercourses’. Lead Local Flood Authorities, District Councils and Internal Drainage Boards carry out flood risk management on ordinary watercourses. To see a map of the Main River network, please visit: https://environment.maps.arcgis.com/apps/webappviewer/index.html?id=17cd53dfc524433 980cc333726a56386 Lead Local Flood Authority (LLFA) LLFAs are county councils and unitary authorities. They are responsible for managing and investigating the risk of flooding from surface water, groundwater and ordinary watercourses (smaller watercourses) and lead on community recovery. For information for your local council, please contact: Derbyshire County Council 01629 533190 www.derbyshire.gov.uk/environment/flooding/responsibilities/flood-risk- responsibilities.aspx Internal Drainage Board Each Internal Drainage Board (IDB) is a public body that manages water levels in an area, known as an internal drainage district, where there is a special need for drainage. IDBs undertake works to reduce flood risk to people and property, and manage water levels for agricultural and environmental needs within their district. However, not all areas are covered by an IDB, and your area does not fall within an internal drainage district. -
Crich NP Final Version June 2018
07/06/2018 (June 2018) 1 Crich Parish Neighbourhood Plan 2017-2031 Contents 1 Foreword ................................................................................................................................................ 4 2 What is the Crich Parish Neighbourhood Plan? ...................................................................................... 5 3 Why do we want a Neighbourhood Plan? .............................................................................................. 7 4 How does this Neighbourhood Plan work within the planning system? ................................................ 7 5 Consultation and the process of developing the Plan ............................................................................ 8 6 Crich Parish in Context ..........................................................................................................................10 Location ........................................................................................................................................................10 Heritage ........................................................................................................................................................10 Crich Parish Today.........................................................................................................................................18 Community Facilities and Services ................................................................................................................20 Natural Environment -
Peak District National Park Visitor Survey 2005
PEAK DISTRICT NATIONAL PARK VISITOR SURVEY 2005 Performance Review and Research Service www.peakdistrict.gov.uk Peak District National Park Authority Visitor Survey 2005 Member of the Association of National Park Authorities (ANPA) Aldern House Baslow Road Bakewell Derbyshire DE45 1AE Tel: (01629) 816 200 Text: (01629) 816 319 Fax: (01629) 816 310 E-mail: [email protected] Website: www.peakdistrict.gov.uk Your comments and views on this Report are welcomed. Comments and enquiries can be directed to Sonia Davies, Research Officer on 01629 816 242. This report is accessible from our website, located under ‘publications’. We are happy to provide this information in alternative formats on request where reasonable. ii Acknowledgements Grateful thanks to Chatsworth House Estate for allowing us to survey within their grounds; Moors for the Future Project for their contribution towards this survey; and all the casual staff, rangers and office based staff in the Peak District National Park Authority who have helped towards the collection and collation of the information used for this report. iii Contents Page 1. Introduction 1.1 The Peak District National Park 1 1.2 Background to the survey 1 2. Methodology 2.1 Background to methodology 2 2.2 Location 2 2.3 Dates 3 2.4 Logistics 3 3. Results: 3.1 Number of people 4 3.2 Response rate and confidence limits 4 3.3 Age 7 3.4 Gender 8 3.5 Ethnicity 9 3.6 Economic Activity 11 3.7 Mobility 13 3.8 Group Size 14 3.9 Group Type 14 3.10 Groups with children 16 3.11 Groups with disability 17 3.12 -
Directory of Churches
Directory of Churches www.derby.anglican.org Please email any amendments to [email protected] December 2016 Contents Contact Details Diocese of Derby 1 Diocesan Support Office, Church House 2 Area Deans 4 Board of Education 5 Alphabetical List of Churches 6 List of Churches - Archdeaconry, Deanery, Benefice, Parish & Church Order 13 Church Details Chesterfield Archdeaconry Carsington Deanery ................................................................................................................... 22 Hardwick Deanery ..................................................................................................................... 28 North East Derbyshire Deanery .................................................................................................. 32 Peak Deanery ............................................................................................................................. 37 Derby Archdeaconry City Deanery ............................................................................................................................... 45 Duffield & Longford Deanery ...................................................................................................... 51 Mercia Deanery .......................................................................................................................... 56 South East Derbyshire Deanery ................................................................................................. 60 Chesterfield Archdeaconry Carsington Deanery .................................................................................................................. -
Matlock Bath. Walter M
MATLOCK, MAT·LOCK BATH,AND BORDERS. Reduced from the Ordnance Survey. ~~ • ,---.. ! TIN Rn,11 \ • • • ............ ............. ...... ,,, •, . .. ...a:-.. , Btac/cbrook " . ..... ... Koor ~r:P ............ ~ / ..t:.4.:lt *-'=4 . e...:. .,.... , .._.JA. • "' ... ...... * ........... -.. it ........ ' ~... a./• .. ...........u ~----.. / . .. ... ... ..._ ... ~· . • .,,,p_--... o'·~:. ...... u, .., ........ ..-: <-. ,~ 4. ..... .. ........ ,. ia••=-•·=;-., ..~"=::: >.• •/.-.;; ·- ................ ,, :t. .t. 4 ''',). ~lliddle .lloor . ·. .,, . ~ e'a . .. ......... a. 0 fl) e 0 • r 0 r :II ............ *., ,---. ....~.,.'!' :. .......... ~ ........... dnope Q.arriu ............. • 905 Far leg • ..--·-- · __... ...____";MATLOC :I ............ ....... ,,. .. ..... ., .•. \ \ \ - ..... ,1,,.,, -~\ . i i I .·u, •." ·; ... ".·-.,-· .• if :~:'.~.. _B-::o w ·0·••;=;1•:. • -- 4 ~ .......,._ ~~ ~ ~,o.:<Q. :.: ~- .. '°~. .:""'{lie.,_ -~ "'o \\_'.icke,- • o :Tor 0 ~ • G, '-~- 4A. ., A. :-·•••• ,: • ,. ~-~u ,o;~.,; -.....::.-,,.,... ..!~.a.O•~. , 4 ~ A~-...~~:,: 0 '°".•, -A. 9,,-•..,s."' ❖... ~o .Q. ,.,_== 4"" • •" ····... _o • • - ,':r.o. :.=· 4.. :: 4 4(;~t~:·;if -~"'' 9 • -• ·: :.:- Q. =~ \!~.~-<>: t 9.'~ ·: Q, ~j;;• .; ~-'il!9t;~• .....-~ q .. 4.,: ...,. Reproduced from -the Ordnance Survey Map with the .sanction of'-tJ,e C,ontro!Jer of H.Ms. St:Jtionery Office. StanfortI:s Geog !-Eatall:..loruiPv 0t:==========='=====:::l:====;l::::::==========l:::====:::i===~ 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 ci'AJNS MATLOCK MANOR AND p ARI SH Historical ~ 'Descriptive WITH -
Proposed Development of Green Fields East of Bowmer Lane, Fritchley Set out in the Email of Sophie Williams, Savills Sent to the Parish Council on 20Th May 2020
CRICH PARISH COUNCIL Glebe Field Centre Glebe Field Close Crich Derbyshire DE4 5EU Tel: 01773 853928 E-mail: [email protected] Savills Enfield Chambers 18 Low Pavement Nottingham NG1 7DG 27th May 2020 For the attention of Mr Rob Moore MRICS MRTPI - Associate Director, Planning Dear Mr Moore Land to the east of Bowmer Lane, Fritchley The Parish Council strongly objects to the proposed development of green fields east of Bowmer Lane, Fritchley set out in the email of Sophie Williams, Savills sent to the Parish Council on 20th May 2020. It is noted that following objection from Crich Parish Council and many other parties, Amber Valley Borough Council refused planning permission on the same site on 18 August 2017 in respect of a proposal for residential development (Planning Application reference AVA/2017/0023) for the following reasons: 1. The proposal fails to be sustainable by virtue of the environmental harm caused by the proposal to designated heritage assets and the countryside landscape. This is contrary to Paragraph 7 of the National Planning Policy Framework, which states that there are three dimensions to sustainable development: economic, social and environmental, which must be read together as they are mutually dependent in the interests of ensuring a sustainable form of development is provided, and contrary to Saved policy LS1 of the Local Plan, which states, amongst others, that development should protect and enhance the quality of the built and natural environment. 2. Approval of the proposal would result in a detrimental impact to the setting of the Grade II Listed Old Farm House and Fritchley Conservation Area due to the development of a greenfield site directly abutting the boundary and setting of these designated heritage assets, resulting in an inappropriate urban intrusion which erodes the Conservation Area and Listed Building's surrounding rural setting.