Durham Research Online

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Load more

Durham Research Online Deposited in DRO: 11 August 2015 Version of attached le: Published Version Peer-review status of attached le: Peer-reviewed Citation for published item: Crabtree, C. J. and Zappal¡a,D. and Hogg, S. I. (2015) 'Wind energy : UK experiences and oshore operational challenges.', Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part A : journal of power and energy., 229 (7). pp. 727-746. Further information on publisher's website: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0957650915597560 Publisher's copyright statement: This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License (http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/) which permits any use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specied on the SAGE and Open Access page (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage). Additional information: Use policy The full-text may be used and/or reproduced, and given to third parties in any format or medium, without prior permission or charge, for personal research or study, educational, or not-for-prot purposes provided that: • a full bibliographic reference is made to the original source • a link is made to the metadata record in DRO • the full-text is not changed in any way The full-text must not be sold in any format or medium without the formal permission of the copyright holders. Please consult the full DRO policy for further details. Durham University Library, Stockton Road, Durham DH1 3LY, United Kingdom Tel : +44 (0)191 334 3042 | Fax : +44 (0)191 334 2971 https://dro.dur.ac.uk Special Issue on Renewables Proc IMechE Part A: J Power and Energy 0(0) 1–20 Wind energy: UK experiences and ! IMechE 2015 Reprints and permissions: offshore operational challenges sagepub.co.uk/journalsPermissions.nav DOI: 10.1177/0957650915597560 pia.sagepub.com Christopher J Crabtree, Donatella Zappala´ and Simon I Hogg Abstract This paper presents a discussion of the development of wind energy generation in the United Kingdom and the chal- lenges faced by the wind industry including reliability, performance and condition monitoring, particularly in the offshore environment. The worldwide installed capacity of offshore wind has now risen to over 7 GW, with an ever increasing deployment rate of new assets. About 90% of the global currently installed capacity is in Northern Europe, with the United Kingdom having the world’s largest share at 4 GW. Capacity factor data from UK offshore wind farms is pre- sented, providing an insight into the current performance of large Round 2 offshore wind farms compared to the earlier Round 1 farms and to onshore farms. The data reveal that the United Kingdom’s Round 2 offshore farms are achieving an average monthly capacity factor of 38.3% with a peak value of 75.8%. The older Round 1 farms have a lower average capacity factor of 33.6% while large onshore farms with capacities above 100 MW have achieved 25.6%. Offshore wind turbine performance has improved over time, and the industry is applying the learning from early experiences to achieve better performances at the more recently installed farms. Despite these improvements in turbine availability, the cost of energy from wind, particularly offshore, remains too high for it to be a commercially viable form of generation without subsidies. Reducing the cost of energy from wind to economically sustainable levels is the most important challenge facing the industry today. Operation and maintenance costs constitute up to 30 % of the total cost of energy from wind in large farms. The industry must overcome the challenges associated with improving component reliability and the devel- opment and adoption by operators of appropriate condition monitoring systems and maintenance strategies, in order to reduce costs to sustainable levels. Research and development work carried out with these goals in mind is also reviewed in the paper. Keywords Wind, offshore wind, reliability, performance, condition monitoring Date received: 9 December 2014; accepted: 15 June 2015 Introduction by 2030 with the aim of decarbonising the economy The challenges of climate change, energy security and by between 80% and 95% by 2050.2 cost of energy are becoming ever more present for gov- Wind energy has become the strongest and fastest ernments across the world. As a result, governments growing renewable energy technology worldwide are changing their approaches to electricity generation over the last 30 years, thanks largely to recent techno- and countries are seeing significant diversification in logical advances and commercial growth. It now plays their energy generation mixes, moving towards renew- a central role in the immediate and longer-term energy able sources, nuclear and clean conventional plant. strategies of many countries. The exploitation of renewable energy resources is By the end of 2013, the global installed capacity of central to European Union (EU) environmental and wind turbines (WT) stood at 318.1 GW, of which energy policy goals. The EU has committed to a leg- 117.3 GW was installed in the EU.3 Projections by ally binding target of meeting 20% of its total energy the European Wind Energy Association (EWEA) in demand (heating, transport and electricity) from 2011 suggest that 230 GW of wind capacity will be renewable sources by 2020. If this target is to be rea- lised it means that 34% of electricity generated1 will need to come from renewable sources by this date. In School of Engineering and Computing Sciences, Durham University, UK a communication entitled ‘A policy framework for Corresponding author: climate and energy in the period from 2020 to 2030,’ Christopher J Crabtree, School of Engineering and Computing the EU proposes increasing the share of renewable Sciences, Durham University, Durham, DH1 3LE, UK. energy to at least 27% of EU energy consumption Email: [email protected] Downloaded from pia.sagepub.com at UNIV OF DURHAM LIBRARY on August 7, 2015 2 Proc IMechE Part A: J Power and Energy 0(0) installed in the EU by 2020, rising to 400 GW by 2030 in 2001 of the ‘Offshore Wind Capital Grants Scheme’ and 735 GW by 2050.4 In 2007, the European by the UK Department of Trade and Industry led to Commission reported5 a lower target installed capacity investment in five farms of 60–90 MW scale (North of 146 GW by 2030 of which 129 GW would be onshore Hoyle, Scroby Sands, Kentish Flats, Barrow and and 17 GW offshore. The EWEA 2014 European Burbo Bank). All of these have now been fully oper- Statistics report6 shows 128.8 GW of installed capacity ational for at least 7 years. The sites offered the poten- in the EU with approximately 120 GW onshore and tial for the United Kingdom to gain vital experience of 8 GW offshore. These current figures suggest that the offshore technology and operations. Under the Capital EU is on course to pass the European Commission Grants Scheme, a number of reports on the operating expectation for 2030; however, there is a long way to history of the wind farms were made publicly available. go before the EWEA projections are realised. The data, analysed in Feng et al.,8 found that the A significant proportion of this forecast installed farms were achieving an overall average availability capacity is expected to be offshore, with many new of 80.2% with an average capacity factor over 3 large-scale sites already identified for development in years of 29.5%.9 However, the capacity factor Europe due to the favourable wind resources and sub- remained below the estimate for EU offshore wind sea conditions. farms of 35%, based on Danish experience. This was Offshore wind has advantages over onshore both partly due to the low availability of 80.2%. technically and in terms of public perception. Offshore In the United Kingdom, The Crown Estate has average wind speeds are higher and turbulence is now held three rounds of bidding for the award of generally lower than in the onshore environment, wind farm site development rights in UK waters, which results in greater energy capture for a given resulting in the United Kingdom now having 22 oper- wind farm size. Politically and in terms of public per- ational offshore wind farms with capacities ranging ception, offshore wind has the advantage that visual from 60 MW to 630 MW. The UK offshore portfolio impact and noise concerns are largely mitigated by is summarised in Table 1. London Array and Greater distance, although challenges remain with respect to Gabbard are, respectively, the world’s largest and marine life. There is also significant potential for very second largest offshore wind farms by capacity. large-scale offshore sites to be developed. Onshore In addition to the farms listed in Table 1, the farms are generally much more limited in capacity United Kingdom has two test sites, each with two due to space constraints; however, large-scale sites turbines. The two 2 MW Vestas turbines at Blyth, have been developed in the USA where the large Northumberland, were the United Kingdom’s first plains can deliver favourable wind conditions. offshore turbines. These have been operating intermit- The worldwide installed capacity of offshore wind tently since the year 2000. The Beatrice wind farm, in current stands at approximately 7 GW3 and is increasing the Moray Firth, features two 5 MW REpower tur- on a daily basis. Around 90% of this capacity is in north- bines. These were constructed in order to assess the ern Europe. The United Kingdom is the world leader in feasibility of installation and operation in deeper offshore wind with an installed capacity of over 4 GW.
Recommended publications
  • Gravity-Based Foundations in the Offshore Wind Sector

    Gravity-Based Foundations in the Offshore Wind Sector

    Journal of Marine Science and Engineering Review Gravity-Based Foundations in the Offshore Wind Sector M. Dolores Esteban *, José-Santos López-Gutiérrez and Vicente Negro Research Group on Marine, Coastal and Port Environment and other Sensitive Areas, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, E28040 Madrid, Spain; [email protected] (J.-S.L.-G.); [email protected] (V.N.) * Correspondence: [email protected] Received: 27 December 2018; Accepted: 24 January 2019; Published: 12 March 2019 Abstract: In recent years, the offshore wind industry has seen an important boost that is expected to continue in the coming years. In order for the offshore wind industry to achieve adequate development, it is essential to solve some existing uncertainties, some of which relate to foundations. These foundations are important for this type of project. As foundations represent approximately 35% of the total cost of an offshore wind project, it is essential that they receive special attention. There are different types of foundations that are used in the offshore wind industry. The most common types are steel monopiles, gravity-based structures (GBS), tripods, and jackets. However, there are some other types, such as suction caissons, tripiles, etc. For high water depths, the alternative to the previously mentioned foundations is the use of floating supports. Some offshore wind installations currently in operation have GBS-type foundations (also known as GBF: Gravity-based foundation). Although this typology has not been widely used until now, there is research that has highlighted its advantages over other types of foundation for both small and large water depth sites. There are no doubts over the importance of GBS.
  • U.S. Offshore Wind Power Economic Impact Assessment

    U.S. Offshore Wind Power Economic Impact Assessment

    U.S. Offshore Wind Power Economic Impact Assessment Issue Date | March 2020 Prepared By American Wind Energy Association Table of Contents Executive Summary ............................................................................................................................................................................. 1 Introduction .......................................................................................................................................................................................... 2 Current Status of U.S. Offshore Wind .......................................................................................................................................................... 2 Lessons from Land-based Wind ...................................................................................................................................................................... 3 Announced Investments in Domestic Infrastructure ............................................................................................................................ 5 Methodology ......................................................................................................................................................................................... 7 Input Assumptions ............................................................................................................................................................................................... 7 Modeling Tool ........................................................................................................................................................................................................
  • The Middelgrunden Offshore Wind Farm

    The Middelgrunden Offshore Wind Farm

    The Middelgrunden Offshore Wind Farm A Popular Initiative 1 Middelgrunden Offshore Wind Farm Number of turbines............. 20 x 2 MW Installed Power.................... 40 MW Hub height......................... 64 metres Rotor diameter................... 76 metres Total height........................ 102 metres Foundation depth................ 4 to 8 metres Foundation weight (dry)........ 1,800 tonnes Wind speed at 50-m height... 7.2 m/s Expected production............ 100 GWh/y Production 2002................. 100 GWh (wind 97% of normal) Park efficiency.................... 93% Construction year................ 2000 Investment......................... 48 mill. EUR Kastrup Airport The Middelgrunden Wind Farm is situated a few kilometres away from the centre of Copenhagen. The offshore turbines are connected by cable to the transformer at the Amager power plant 3.5 km away. Kongedybet Hollænderdybet Middelgrunden Saltholm Flak 2 From Idea to Reality The idea of the Middelgrunden wind project was born in a group of visionary people in Copenhagen already in 1993. However it took seven years and a lot of work before the first cooperatively owned offshore wind farm became a reality. Today the 40 MW wind farm with twenty modern 2 MW wind turbines developed by the Middelgrunden Wind Turbine Cooperative and Copenhagen Energy Wind is producing electricity for more than 40,000 households in Copenhagen. In 1996 the local association Copenhagen Environment and Energy Office took the initiative of forming a working group for placing turbines on the Middelgrunden shoal and a proposal with 27 turbines was presented to the public. At that time the Danish Energy Authority had mapped the Middelgrunden shoal as a potential site for wind development, but it was not given high priority by the civil servants and the power utility.
  • A New Era for Wind Power in the United States

    A New Era for Wind Power in the United States

    Chapter 3 Wind Vision: A New Era for Wind Power in the United States 1 Photo from iStock 7943575 1 This page is intentionally left blank 3 Impacts of the Wind Vision Summary Chapter 3 of the Wind Vision identifies and quantifies an array of impacts associated with continued deployment of wind energy. This 3 | Summary Chapter chapter provides a detailed accounting of the methods applied and results from this work. Costs, benefits, and other impacts are assessed for a future scenario that is consistent with economic modeling outcomes detailed in Chapter 1 of the Wind Vision, as well as exist- ing industry construction and manufacturing capacity, and past research. Impacts reported here are intended to facilitate informed discus- sions of the broad-based value of wind energy as part of the nation’s electricity future. The primary tool used to evaluate impacts is the National Renewable Energy Laboratory’s (NREL’s) Regional Energy Deployment System (ReEDS) model. ReEDS is a capacity expan- sion model that simulates the construction and operation of generation and transmission capacity to meet electricity demand. In addition to the ReEDS model, other methods are applied to analyze and quantify additional impacts. Modeling analysis is focused on the Wind Vision Study Scenario (referred to as the Study Scenario) and the Baseline Scenario. The Study Scenario is defined as wind penetration, as a share of annual end-use electricity demand, of 10% by 2020, 20% by 2030, and 35% by 2050. In contrast, the Baseline Scenario holds the installed capacity of wind constant at levels observed through year-end 2013.
  • Interim Financial Report, Second Quarter 2021

    Interim Financial Report, Second Quarter 2021

    Company announcement No. 16/2021 Interim Financial Report Second Quarter 2021 Vestas Wind Systems A/S Hedeager 42,8200 Aarhus N, Denmark Company Reg. No.: 10403782 Wind. It means the world to us.TM Contents Summary ........................................................................................................................................ 3 Financial and operational key figures ......................................................................................... 4 Sustainability key figures ............................................................................................................. 5 Group financial performance ....................................................................................................... 6 Power Solutions ............................................................................................................................ 9 Service ......................................................................................................................................... 12 Sustainability ............................................................................................................................... 13 Strategy and financial and capital structure targets ................................................................ 14 Outlook 2021 ................................................................................................................................ 17 Consolidated financial statements 1 January - 30 June .........................................................
  • Offshore Wind Initiatives at the U.S. Department of Energy U.S

    Offshore Wind Initiatives at the U.S. Department of Energy U.S

    Offshore Wind Initiatives at the U.S. Department of Energy U.S. Offshore Wind Sets Sail Coastal and Great Lakes states account for nearly 80% of U.S. electricity demand, and the winds off the shores of these coastal load centers have a technical resource potential twice as large as the nation’s current electricity use. With the costs of offshore wind energy falling globally and the first U.S. offshore wind farm operational off the coast of Block Island, Rhode Island since 2016, offshore wind has the potential to contribute significantly to a clean, affordable, and secure national energy mix. To support the development of a world-class offshore The Block Island Wind Farm, the first U.S. offshore wind farm, wind industry, the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) represents the launch of an industry that has the potential to has been supporting a broad portfolio of offshore contribute contribute significantly to a clean, affordable, and secure energy mix. Photo by Dennis Schroeder, NREL 40389 wind research, development, and demonstration projects since 2011 and released a new National Offshore Wind Strategy jointly with the U.S. offshore wind R&D consortium. Composed of representatives Department of the Interior (DOI) in 2016. from industry, academia, government, and other stakeholders, the consortium’s goal is to advance offshore wind plant Research, Development, and technologies, develop innovative methods for wind resource and site characterization, and develop advanced technology solutions Demonstration Projects solutions to address U.S.-specific installation, operation, DOE has allocated over $250 million to offshore wind research maintenance, and supply chain needs.
  • Floating Offshore Wind Vision Statement June 2017

    Floating Offshore Wind Vision Statement June 2017

    Floating Offshore Wind Vision Statement June 2017 Floating Offshore Wind Vision Statement June 2017 windeurope.org KEY MESSAGES 1. FLOATING OFFSHORE WIND 4. FLOATING MEANS MORE IS COMING OF AGE OFFSHORE WIND Floating offshore wind is no longer confined to R&D. It has An increase in offshore wind installations is needed in now reached a high ‘technology readiness level.’ It is also order to meet renewable electricity generation targets set using the latest technology available in the rest of the by the European Commission. Improving conditions for offshore wind supply chain. floating offshore wind will enhance the deployment of overall offshore wind capacity and subsequently support the EU in reaching the 2030 targets. 2. COSTS WILL FALL Floating offshore wind has a very positive cost-reduction 5. EUROPEAN LEADERSHIP outlook. Prices will decrease as rapidly as they have in NEEDS EARLY ACTION onshore and bottom-fixed offshore wind, and potentially at an even greater speed. If Europe is to keep its global technological leadership in offshore wind, it needs to move fast to deploy floating offshore wind and exploit its enormous potential. 3. WE ARE A UNITED INDUSTRY Europe has long been the global leader in offshore wind. Floating offshore wind will take advantage of cost reduction techniques developed in bottom-fixed offshore wind thanks to the significant area of overlap between these two marine renewable energy solutions. 4 Floating Offshore Wind Vision Statement - June 2017 WindEurope 1. INTRODUCTION Floating Offshore Wind (FOW) holds the key to an phase (>8) in which the technology is deemed appropriate inexhaustible resource potential in Europe.
  • Offshore Wind: Can the United States Catch up with Europe? January 2016

    Offshore Wind: Can the United States Catch up with Europe? January 2016

    Offshore Wind: Can the United States Catch up with Europe? January 2016 Wind energy power generation is on the rise around the world, due to its low fixed prices and lack of greenhouse gas emissions. A cumulative total of 369,553 megawatts (MW) of wind energy capacity was installed globally by the end of 2014.1 Of that total, only two percent came from offshore wind farms, which are able to capture stronger and more reliable ocean winds to generate electricity.2 Most offshore wind capacity is in Europe, where there are 3,072 grid-connected offshore wind turbines at 82 farms spanning 11 countries, for a total of 10,393.6 MW of wind energy capacity as of June 30, 2015.3 China, the leader in offshore wind in Asia, had 718.9 MW of installed capacity; Japan, 52 MW; and South Korea, 5 MW as of October 2015.4, 5, 6 In comparison, the United States is just beginning to invest in offshore wind energy, and is rapidly approaching the operational launch of its first commercial offshore wind farm. There is incredible potential for offshore wind development in the United States – the National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL) has estimated the United States has over 4,000 gigawatts (GW) of offshore wind potential, enough to power the country four times over.7 Installed Capacity European Union Offshore Wind Installed Capacity Offshore Wind (as of first quarter 2015) (as of first quarter 2015) Netherlands, 361 MW, 3% Sweden, 212 MW, 2% 10,393.60 Other, 60 MW, 1% Belgium, 712 MW, 7% United Kingdom, Germany, 5,017.00 2,760 MW, MW, 48% 27% 0.02 776 UNITED STATES E U R O P E A N CHINA, JAPAN, Denmark, 1,271 MW, 12% UNION SOUTH KOREA Figure 1: Megawatts of offshore wind in the world8 Figure 2: E.U.
  • U.S. Offshore Wind Manufacturing and Supply Chain Development

    U.S. Offshore Wind Manufacturing and Supply Chain Development

    U.S. Offshore Wind Manufacturing and Supply Chain Development Prepared for: U.S. Department of Energy Navigant Consulting, Inc. 77 Bedford Street Suite 400 Burlington, MA 01803-5154 781.270.8314 www.navigant.com February 22, 2013 U.S. Offshore Wind Manufacturing and Supply Chain Development Document Number DE-EE0005364 Prepared for: U.S. Department of Energy Michael Hahn Cash Fitzpatrick Gary Norton Prepared by: Navigant Consulting, Inc. Bruce Hamilton, Principal Investigator Lindsay Battenberg Mark Bielecki Charlie Bloch Terese Decker Lisa Frantzis Aris Karcanias Birger Madsen Jay Paidipati Andy Wickless Feng Zhao Navigant Consortium member organizations Key Contributors American Wind Energy Association Jeff Anthony and Chris Long Great Lakes Wind Collaborative John Hummer and Victoria Pebbles Green Giraffe Energy Bankers Marie DeGraaf, Jérôme Guillet, and Niels Jongste National Renewable Energy Laboratory David Keyser and Eric Lantz Ocean & Coastal Consultants (a COWI company) Brent D. Cooper, P.E., Joe Marrone, P.E., and Stanley M. White, P.E., D.PE, D.CE Tetra Tech EC, Inc. Michael D. Ernst, Esq. Notice and Disclaimer This report was prepared by Navigant Consulting, Inc. for the use of the U.S. Department of Energy – who supported this effort under Award Number DE-EE0005364. The work presented in this report represents our best efforts and judgments based on the information available at the time this report was prepared. Navigant Consulting, Inc. is not responsible for the reader’s use of, or reliance upon, the report, nor any decisions based on the report. NAVIGANT CONSULTING, INC. MAKES NO REPRESENTATIONS OR WARRANTIES, EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED. Readers of the report are advised that they assume all liabilities incurred by them, or third parties, as a result of their reliance on the report, or the data, information, findings and opinions contained in the report.
  • Offshore Wind Energy Resource Assessment Across the Territory of Oman: a Spatial-Temporal Data Analysis

    Offshore Wind Energy Resource Assessment Across the Territory of Oman: a Spatial-Temporal Data Analysis

    sustainability Article Offshore Wind Energy Resource Assessment across the Territory of Oman: A Spatial-Temporal Data Analysis Amer Al-Hinai 1,2,* , Yassine Charabi 3 and Seyed H. Aghay Kaboli 1,3 1 Sustainable Energy Research Center, Sultan Qaboos University, 123 Muscat, Oman; [email protected] 2 Department of Electrical & Computer Engineering, College of Engineering, Sultan Qaboos University, 123 Muscat, Oman 3 Center for Environmental Studies and Research, Sultan Qaboos University, 123 Muscat, Oman; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] Abstract: Despite the long shoreline of Oman, the wind energy industry is still confined to onshore due to the lack of knowledge about offshore wind potential. A spatial-temporal wind data analysis is performed in this research to find the locations in Oman’s territorial seas with the highest potential for offshore wind energy. Thus, wind data are statistically analyzed for assessing wind characteristics. Statistical analysis of wind data include the wind power density, and Weibull scale and shape factors. In addition, there is an estimation of the possible energy production and capacity factor by three commercial offshore wind turbines suitable for 80 up to a 110 m hub height. The findings show that offshore wind turbines can produce at least 1.34 times more energy than land-based and nearshore wind turbines. Additionally, offshore wind turbines generate more power in the Omani peak electricity demand during the summer. Thus, offshore wind turbines have great advantages over land-based wind turbines in Oman. Overall, this work provides guidance on the deployment Citation: Al-Hinai, A.; Charabi, Y.; and production of offshore wind energy in Oman.
  • Assessment of the Effects of Noise and Vibration from Offshore Wind Farms on Marine Wildlife

    Assessment of the Effects of Noise and Vibration from Offshore Wind Farms on Marine Wildlife

    ASSESSMENT OF THE EFFECTS OF NOISE AND VIBRATION FROM OFFSHORE WIND FARMS ON MARINE WILDLIFE ETSU W/13/00566/REP DTI/Pub URN 01/1341 Contractor University of Liverpool, Centre for Marine and Coastal Studies Environmental Research and Consultancy Prepared by G Vella, I Rushforth, E Mason, A Hough, R England, P Styles, T Holt, P Thorne The work described in this report was carried out under contract as part of the DTI Sustainable Energy Programmes. The views and judgements expressed in this report are those of the contractor and do not necessarily reflect those of the DTI. First published 2001 i © Crown copyright 2001 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Main objectives of the report Energy Technology Support Unit (ETSU), on behalf of the Department of Trade and Industry (DTI) commissioned the Centre for Marine and Coastal Studies (CMACS) in October 2000, to assess the effect of noise and vibration from offshore wind farms on marine wildlife. The key aims being to review relevant studies, reports and other available information, identify any gaps and uncertainties in the current data and make recommendations, with outline methodologies, to address these gaps. Introduction The UK has 40% of Europe ’s total potential wind resource, with mean annual offshore wind speeds, at a reference of 50m above sea level, of between 7m/s and 9m/s. Research undertaken by the British Wind Energy Association suggests that a ‘very good ’ site for development would have a mean annual wind speed of 8.5m/s. The total practicable long-term energy yield for the UK, taking limiting factors into account, would be approximately 100 TWh/year (DTI, 1999).
  • Offshore Wind Turbine Installation Analyses

    Offshore Wind Turbine Installation Analyses

    = Offshore Wind Turbine Transportation & Installation Analyses Planning Optimal Marine Operations for Offshore Wind Projects EMRE URAZ Master Thesis Visby, Sweden 2011 Offshore Wind Turbine Transportation & Installation Analyses Planning Optimal Marine Operations for Offshore Wind Projects Master Thesis by Emre URAZ Master Thesis written at Gotland University, June 2011, Department of Wind Energy Supervisor: Richard Koehler HGO, Department of Wind Energy Examiner: Dr. Bahri Uzunoğlu HGO, Department of Wind Energy Abstract Transportation and installation of offshore wind turbines (Tower, Nacelle and Rotor) is a complete process conducted over several phases, usually in sequence. There are several factors that can turn this process into a challenge. These factors can either be due to offshore site conditions or the technical limitations of the installation vessels. Each project has its own characteristic parameters and requires a unique optimum solution. This paper identifies the dynamics of the installation process and analyzes the effects of each phase on the progression of events. The challenges in wind turbine installations due to offshore environment were investigated, the effects of each were explained and their significances were stressed. Special installation vessels were examined and their technical specifications were analyzed in terms of working conditions, dimensions, service performances, and crane capacities as well as projecting future design trends. Several offshore wind farm projects were analyzed; their installation methods were specified, and compared to each other to determine advantages and disadvantages of different pre-assembly concepts. The durations of the sub-phases of the process were defined in terms of different variables such as site conditions and individual vessel performance. These definitions were used for making time estimations, and conducting further analyses regarding the effects of different site specific parameters on the overall project duration.