The Marine Dimension of Human Security: Implications for Bangladesh
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
BIISS JOURNAL, VOL. 29, NO. 1, JANUARY 2008: 1-40 Abul Kalam Azad THE MARINE DIMENSION OF HUMAN SECURITY: IMPLICATIONS FOR BANGLADESH Abstract The paradigmatic shift in the concept of security now puts more stress on human security related to welfare of mankind in several ways. The concept of human security is a theme on which the research in an on-going process. Various political scientists, sociologists, economists, environmentalists, security and defense experts and the like are trying to study it from different angles, all with the purpose of better conceptualizing the concept and as well for finding out the means for making it more operational on ground. Interestingly, the concept is also being studied from a perspective that tries to link it with the other contemporary themes like globalization, human rights regime, environment regime, the phenomenon of collapsed state etc. In this respect, one notices very little efforts being expended to understand the concept from an oceanic perspective, notwithstanding the fact that the issues related to human security in the terrestrial environment find their relevance in the ocean medium too. However, such indifference to the marine dimension of human security cannot remain a long lasting phenomenon as the position of ‘global oceans and seas’ is currently in a state of crisis with impact on food security, health security, environmental security, personal security, community security of the individuals that depend on the ocean for their livelihood and sustenance. The management of oceanic affairs is a complicated task as ocean is a medium different from that of land. However, ocean governance is crafted in a manner that is capable Abul Kalam Azad, Ph.D, is Senior Research Fellow at the Bangladesh Institute of International and Strategic Studies (BIISS). His e-mail address is: [email protected] © Bangladesh Institute of International and Strategic Studies (BIISS), 2008. BIISS JOURNAL, VOL. 29, NO. 1, JANUARY 2008 of meeting many challenges that the oceans face at present. From human security perspective, meeting such challenges means prosperity and wellbeing of mankind. Bangladesh as a maritime nation also faces numerous critical human security problems in its maritime zone. It is, therefore, an imperative for the country to confront such challenges in line with the contemporary ocean governance. Key Words: Human Security, Ocean Governance, Marine Environment, UNCLOS, Globalization Introduction In contemporary security discourse, the concept of human security1 has emerged out of a paradigmatic shift from traditional security to a comprehensive one. While the former relates to an excessive state-centric notion of territorial security from military- defense angle, the latter includes within its fold a wide range of issues related to the well-being and safety of the people. Towards this end, human security, in comprehensive terms, includes protection of human being not only from traditional military threats but also from a variety of economic, social, ethnic, epidemiological and environmental threats.2 It should be mentioned that the concept of human security is a theme on which the research is an on-going process. Various political scientists, sociologists, economists, environmentalists, security and defense experts and the like are trying to study it from different angles, all with the purpose of not only better conceptualizing the term, but as well for making it more operational and achievable on ground. Interestingly, the concept is also being studied from a perspective that tries to link it with the 1 For a comprehensive overview of the concept of human security, see S. Alkire, ‘Conceptual Framework for Human Security’, Background Document, Commission for Human Security, available online http://www.humansecurity-chs.og/doc/frame.pdf, accessed on 30 March 2003. Also see, the Commission for Human Security’s documents and publications, available online http://www.humansecurity- chs.org/doc/index.html, accessed on 16 February 2003. 2 Human Security, Center for Global Partnership, available online http://www.cgp.org/cgplink.programs/security priorities.html, accessed on 04 April 2002. other contemporary themes like globalization, governance, human rights regime, terrorism, collapsed state etc. In this respect, one notices very little efforts being expended to understand the concept from an oceanic perspective, notwithstanding the fact that the issues that are related to human security in the terrestrial environment find their relevance in the ocean medium too. While, bits and pieces of works on sustainable development in the oceans, in particular, in the post-Rio period,3 make allusion to human security in the oceans, a direct comprehensive work on the subject is still lacking. Any indifference to the marine dimension of human security, however, cannot remain a long lasting phenomenon. This is because various human security issues as identified in the land like food security, health security, environmental security, security against violence, crimes, political disorder and instability etc. also find their presence in the oceanic domain. In this connection, a fresh reappraisal of the importance of oceans is to be made not only in view of its ability to support and sustain the earth life system by providing many vital resources like food, energy, commerce, medicines and recreation, but also in terms of its linkage with the world climate system, the increasing interdependence among the nations and the world security at large.4 The reappraisal, at the same time, behooves one to take into due consideration several critical factors that are likely to affect the resource base and the carrying capacity of the oceans like the growth in the intensity of ocean activities, the competing and conflicting claims of several users over 3 It may be mentioned that the programme area of Chapter 17 of the Agenda 21 of the Rio Summit for the first time talks about integrated marine and coastal planning within a sustainable framework of development with emphasis on various human factors. See for details, Tullio Treves, ‘The Protection of the Oceans in Agenda 21 and International Environmental Law’, in Luigi Campiolio, Laura Pineschi, Domenico Siniscalo, Tullio Treves (ed), The Environment After Rio : International Law and Economics, Trotman/Martinus Nijhoff, London, 1994, pp. 161-171. 4 It may be noted that in the US, one out of every six jobs is marine related, and one third of the country’s GDP is produced in the coastal zone through fishing, transportation, recreation and other industries. The country’s national security and foreign trade are also dependent on oceans. National Ocean Conference, Naval Post Graduate School, Monterrey, California, June 11-12, 2001. BIISS JOURNAL, VOL. 29, NO. 1, JANUARY 2008 the same ocean resources, the deterioration in ocean health as a consequence of pollution from different sources, the release or deliberate dumping of extremely hazardous wastes, the increasing pressure on the coastal areas due to increase in population, the possibility of extracting marine resources due to development in science and technology, and finally, the occurrence of various types of crimes in the oceans with adverse impacts on ocean order and stability. In the light of the above, the relevant questions that may be raised are: Where lies the rationale for applying the human security concept in the ocean medium? What would be the most appropriate human security issues to be applied in the oceans? Does the concept, in the ocean domain, face the same dilemma as in the terrestrial domain with respect to its comprehensiveness? How does the ocean governance meet the challenges arising out of the various human security issues of marine nature? What implications does oceanic perspective of human security have for Bangladesh? An attempt to address these questions will be taken up in the four successive sections in the paper with a conclusion at the end. Section I: Human Security from an Oceanic Perspective: Finding Out its Rationale Human security in the oceans has as much relevance as in the terrestrial domain. In this connection, an attempt to transpose the land based human security issues in the oceans would not, probably, be without its rationale as it would reveal a similarity not only in the issues concerned, but as well in the challenges and problems in addressing them. Despite this, human security as an adjunct to the traditional state-centric military and territorial security within specific terrestrial socio-economic, political and cultural conditions has met with very little efforts by the security community in transposing it in the oceans and seas. The reasons for this are not far to seek. Firstly, the primary activities of humankind, i.e., political, geo-strategic, economic, social, cultural etc. are essentially land based where the ocean related issues weigh less, notwithstanding the fact that the oceans that cover three-fourth of the planet contribute significantly to the world’s economy, determine its climate, and plays an important role in international security. While such indifference to the oceans may be explained by mankind’s basic preoccupation at land, the fact to explain it more concretely is the general tendency of the national states to keep their oceanic affairs at the periphery of their concerns. As Elisabeth Mann Borgese remarks, “ (...) in the majority of countries ocean affairs does not represent a central concern but a matter subsidiary to other activities having higher priority. Thus, its political stature is generally low, which translates into the location of the activity at a low level within the governmental hierarchy as well as into certain patterns of resource allocation (limited personnel and low levels of funding)”.5 Secondly, the concept of security is basically linked with some of the attributes associated with nation-state i.e., sovereignty and territoriality.6 As a result, each of the nation-states tends to look at its security issues and interests within a well defined geographical space so as to identify, if possible quantify, the magnitude of threats to its security and the means needed to deter it.