Ecoregions of Utah Scattered Open Forests Are Found at Higher Elevations on Mountain Slopes

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Ecoregions of Utah Scattered Open Forests Are Found at Higher Elevations on Mountain Slopes 1 3 . C e n t r a l B a s i n a n d R a n g e Ecoregion 13 is composed of northerly trending, fault-block ranges and intervening, drier basins. Valleys, slopes, and alluvial fans are either shrub and grass-covered, shrub-covered, or barren. Woodland, mountain brush, and Ecoregions of Utah scattered open forests are found at higher elevations on mountain slopes. The potential natural vegetation is, in order of increasing elevation and ruggedness, saltbush-greasewood, Great Basin sagebrush, juniper-pinyon woodland, and scattered western spruce-fir forest. In addition, tule marshes occur locally, especially along the Great Salt Lake shoreline. The Central Basin and Range (13) is internally-drained by ephemeral streams. In Utah, most of Ecoregion 13 lower than about 5,200 feet elevation was inundated by Pleistocene Lake Bonneville. Extensive playas occur and are nearly flat, clayey, and salty. In general, Ecoregion 13 is drier than the Wasatch and Uinta Mountains (19), Literature Cited: Ecoregions denote areas of general similarity in ecosystems and in the type, quality, and shrublands, irrigated valleys, woodlands, forested mountains, and glaciated peaks. cooler than the Mojave Basin and Range (14), and warmer and drier than Ecoregions 12 and 80. Ecoregion 13 has more shrubland and less grassland than the Snake River Plain (12) but lacks both the creosote bush of Ecoregion 14 quantity of environmental resources; they are designed to serve as a spatial framework Ecological diversity is enormous. There are 7 level III ecoregions and 37 level IV Bailey, R.G., Avers, P.E., King, T., and McNab, W.H., eds., 1994, Ecoregions and subregions of the United States and the extensive, dense forests of Ecoregion 19. Soils grade upslope from mesic Aridisols to frigid Mollisols; Entisols also occur on fans, floodplains, and valley bottoms. Basin soils of Ecoregions 13a, 13b, and 13c are typically for the research, assessment, management, and monitoring of ecosystems and ecosystem ecoregions in Utah and most continue into ecologically similar parts of adjacent states. (map) (supplementary table of map unit descriptions compiled and edited by McNab, W.H. and Bailey, R.G.): more saline and alkaline than those of the sagebrush Steppe Valleys (80i) to the north. The land is primarily used for grazing and a greater percentage is used for livestock grazing than in Ecoregion 14. In addition, some irrigated components. Ecoregions are directly applicable to the immediate needs of state agencies, Washington, D.C., U.S. Department of Agriculture-Forest Service, scale 1:7,500,000. The level III and IV ecoregion map on this poster was compiled at a scale of 1:250,000 cropland is found in valleys near mountain water sources. Military bases also are found in Ecoregion 13 and are of environmental significance because of their large area and their unique land uses and management practices. including the development of biological criteria and water quality standards and the Commission for Environmental Cooperation Working Group, 1997, Ecological regions of North America - toward a and depicts revisions and subdivisions of earlier level III ecoregions that were originally The Salt Deserts ecoregion is nearly level, internally-drained, mostly barren, arid, and nonarable. It intermixed with it. Stock grazing is common and trees have been extensively cleared in an effort to increase establishment of management goals for nonpoint-source pollution. They are also common perspective: Montreal, Quebec, Commission for Environmental Cooperation, 71 p. compiled at a smaller scale (USEPA 2000; Omernik 1987). This poster is part of a 13a contains playas, salt flats, mud flats, and saline lakes. Water levels and salinity fluctuate seasonally and livestock forage. Bitterbrush and western serviceberry are important browse for mule deer. relevant to integrated ecosystem management, an ultimate goal of most federal and state Gallant, A.L., Whittier, T.R., Larsen, D.P., Omernik, J.M., and Hughes, R.M., 1989, Regionalization as a tool for collaborative project primarily between USEPA Region VIII, USEPA National Health yearly. Lakes, including the Great Salt Lake, can be too saline for fish. Soils are mostly clayey and poorly- The disjunct High Elevation Carbonate Mountains ecoregion is higher, wetter, and more rugged than resource management agencies. managing environmental resources: Corvallis, Oregon, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, EPA/600/3- drained. Vegetation, where present, is sparse and composed of salt-tolerant plants such as salicornia and saltgrass. 13e Ecoregion 13a is nonarable and nearly barren. The marshland and open water of Ecoregion and Environmental Effects Research Laboratory (Corvallis, Oregon), Utah Department 89/060, 152 p. nearby ecoregions and is largely underlain by limestone, dolomite, or quartzite. Only a few streams Only sparse stands of salt-tolerant plants occur. 13g support plentiful birdlife. The approach used to compile this map is based on the premise that ecological regions of Environmental Quality, Utah Division of Wildlife Resources, Utah Department of Ecoregion 13a is used for recreation, transportation, defense installations, and industry including salt production. originate in its fault-block mountains and provide water to lower and drier ecoregions. Mollisols support Griffith, G.E., Omernik, J.M., Wilton, T.F., and Pierson, S.M., 1994, Ecoregions and subregions of Iowa - a can be identified through the analysis of the spatial patterns and the composition of Natural Resources, United States Department of Agriculture-Forest Service (USFS), The Shadscale-Dominated Saline Basins ecoregion is arid, internally-drained, and gently sloping to subalpine fir, Engelmann spruce, bristlecone pine, limber pine, Douglas-fir, mountain big sagebrush, and aspen. framework for water quality assessment and management: The Journal of the Iowa Academy of Science, v. 101, 13b biotic and abiotic phenomena that affect or reflect differences in ecosystem quality and United States Department of Agriculture-Natural Resources Conservation Service no. 1, p. 5-13. nearly flat. Light-colored soils with high salt and alkali content occur and are dry for extended periods. Forest stands are most extensive on upper, north facing slopes. Carbonates influence floristic composition, integrity (Wiken 1986; Omernik 1987, 1995). These phenomena include geology, (NRCS), United States Department of the Interior-Bureau of Land Management (BLM), Vegetation is salt- and drought-tolerant. It is dominated by shadscale, winterfat, and greasewood and is distinct extend the elevational limits of trees, decrease vegetation density, and affect the quantity and quality of water. Omernik, J.M., 1987, Ecoregions of the conterminous United States (map supplement): Annals of the Association of from the Wyoming big sagebrush of the less saline Ecoregion 13c and the mostly barren Salt Deserts (13a). physiography, vegetation, climate, soils, land use, wildlife, and hydrology. The relative and United States Department of the Interior-Geological Survey (USGS)-Earth American Geographers, v. 77, no. 1, p. 118-125, scale 1:7,500,000. The Moist Wasatch Front Footslopes ecoregion supports the bulk of Utah’s population and importance of each characteristic varies from one ecological region to another regardless Resources Observation Systems (EROS) Data Center. Ecoregion 13b is primarily rangeland, but large livestock and poultry farms are found locally. Irrigated farming is 13f commercial activity. It is fed by perennial streams and aqueducts that originate in the adjacent Wasatch Omernik, J.M., 1995, Ecoregions - a framework for environmental management, in Davis, W.S. and Simon, T.P., of the hierarchical level. A Roman numeral hierarchical scheme has been adopted for less common than in Ecoregion 80h or the densely populated Moist Wasatch Front Footslopes (13f). Range. Irrigated cropland growing alfalfa, vegetables, and small grains as well as orchards are common outside The project is associated with an interagency effort to develop a common framework of eds., Biological assessment and criteria-tools for water resource planning and decision making: Boca Raton, different levels of ecological regions. Level I is the coarsest level, dividing North Florida, Lewis Publishers, p. 49-62. The Sagebrush Basins and Slopes ecoregion is semiarid. The potential natural vegetation is Great Basin of urban areas. Land use has affected stream quality and irrigation diversions have reduced stream flow. ecological regions. Reaching that objective requires recognition of the differences in the 13c America into 15 ecological regions. Level II divides the continent into 52 regions sagebrush. It is dominated by Wyoming big sagebrush but perennial bunchgrasses occur and become The nearly level Wetlands ecoregion contains rushes, reed grasses, and areas of open water. It is critical conceptual approaches and mapping methodologies applied to develop the most U.S. Department of Agriculture-Soil Conservation Service, 1981, Land resource regions and major land resource increasingly common northward as available moisture increases. However, cool season grasses are less abundant (Commission for Environmental Cooperation Working Group 1997). At level III, the Ephemeral streams, internal drainage, dry shrub-covered valleys, alluvial fans, and fault block 13g habitat for migratory birds and many state and federal wildlife refuges are found within it. Water levels common ecoregion-type frameworks, including those developed by the
Recommended publications
  • The Wasatch Fault
    The WasatchWasatchThe FaultFault UtahUtah Geological Geological Survey Survey PublicPublic Information Information Series Series 40 40 11 9 9 9 9 6 6 The WasatchWasatchThe FaultFault CONTENTS The ups and downs of the Wasatch fault . .1 What is the Wasatch fault? . .1 Where is the Wasatch fault? Globally ............................................................................................2 Regionally . .2 Locally .............................................................................................4 Surface expressions (how to recognize the fault) . .5 Land use - your fault? . .8 At a glance - geological relationships . .10 Earthquakes ..........................................................................................12 When/how often? . .14 Howbig? .........................................................................................15 Earthquake hazards . .15 Future probability of the "big one" . .16 Where to get additional information . .17 Selected bibliography . .17 Acknowledgments Text by Sandra N. Eldredge. Design and graphics by Vicky Clarke. Special thanks to: Walter Arabasz of the University of Utah Seismograph Stations for per- mission to reproduce photographs on p. 6, 9, II; Utah State University for permission to use the satellite image mosaic on the cover; Rebecca Hylland for her assistance; Gary Christenson, Kimm Harty, William Lund, Edith (Deedee) O'Brien, and Christine Wilkerson for their reviews; and James Parker for drafting. Research supported by the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS), Department
    [Show full text]
  • 2448, Raft River Mountains Fault
    2448, RAFT RIVER MOUNTAINS FAULT Structure number: 2448. Comments: Hecker's (1993) fault number 6-17. Structure name: Raft River Mountains fault. Comments: Synopsis: Poorly understood middle to late Pleistocene(?) fault in the Raft River Mountains. The fault is in both Utah and Idaho. Date of compilation: 10/99. Compiler and affiliation: Bill D. Black (Utah Geological Survey) and Suzanne Hecker (U.S. Geological Survey). State: Utah. County: Box Elder. 1° x 2° sheet: Brigham City. Province: Basin and Range. Reliability of location: Poor. Comments: Mapped by Compton (1972) and Doelling (1980). Mapping from Doelling (1980). Geologic setting: North-trending normal fault near the Utah-Idaho border along the northeast side of the Raft River Mountains. The Raft River Mountains have a core of Precambrian metamorphic rocks and trend east-west, similar to the Uinta Mountains. Northern slopes of the mountains drain into the Snake River and are considered part of the Snake River Plain, rather than the Great Basin. Sense of movement: N. Comments: Dip: No data. Comments: Dip direction: E. Geomorphic expression: Faulted alluvium. Age of faulted deposits: Middle to late Pleistocene(?). Paleoseismology studies: None. Timing of most recent paleoevent: (4) Middle and late Quaternary (<750 ka). Comments: Recurrence interval: No data. Comments: Slip rate: Unknown, probably <0.2 mm/yr. Comments: Length: End to end (km): 2 Cumulative trace (km): 2 Average strike (azimuth): N1°E REFERENCES Compton, R.R., 1972, Geologic map of the Yost quadrangle, Box Elder County, Utah and Cassia County, Idaho: U.S. Geological Survey Miscellaneous Investigations Series Map I-672, scale 1:31,680.
    [Show full text]
  • Geology of the Northern Part of Wellsville Mountain, Northern Wasatch Range, Utah
    Utah State University DigitalCommons@USU All Graduate Theses and Dissertations Graduate Studies 5-1958 Geology of the Northern Part of Wellsville Mountain, Northern Wasatch Range, Utah Stanley S. Beus Utah State University Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/etd Part of the Geology Commons Recommended Citation Beus, Stanley S., "Geology of the Northern Part of Wellsville Mountain, Northern Wasatch Range, Utah" (1958). All Graduate Theses and Dissertations. 4430. https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/etd/4430 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate Studies at DigitalCommons@USU. It has been accepted for inclusion in All Graduate Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@USU. For more information, please contact [email protected]. GEOWGY OF THE NORTHERN PART OF WELLSVILLE MJUNTAIN, NORTHERN WASATCH RANGE, UTAH - by Stanley S. Beus A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE in Geology UTAH STATE UNIVERSITY Logan, Utah 1958 ACKNO I\ LEDGMENT I am grateful to Dr . J. Stewa rt Ni lli ama, Dr. Clyde T. Hardy , and Professor Dona ld R. Olsen for the as sista nce in field work and for their suggestions concerning the wr iting of this manuscript. Stanley S . Be us II TABLE OF CONTENTS Pa ge Introduction 1 Purpose a nd s cope 1 Location a nd extent of area 1 Physiography 2 Field work 11 5 Previous i nvestigati ons 6 Str a tigr aphy 8 Pr e - Ca mbrian r ocks 8 Cambri an system 9 Bri gham quart zi te 10 La ngs ton forma tion 11 Ute f orma tion 13 Bla cksmith for mation 14 Bloomington f or ma t ion 16 Nounan f orma tion 17 St.
    [Show full text]
  • The Eastern Africa Coastal Forests Ecoregion
    The Eastern Africa Coastal Forests Ecoregion Strategic Framework for Conservation 2005 – 2025 Strategic Framework for Conservation (2005–2025) The Eastern Afrca Coastal Forests Ecoregon Strategc Framework for Conservaton 2005–2025 The Eastern Africa Coastal Forests Ecoregion Publshed August 2006 Editor: Kimunya Mugo Design and layout: Anthony Mwangi Cover design: Kimunya Mugo Front cover main photo: WWF-EARPO / John SALEHE Front cover other photos: WWF-UK / Brent STIRTON / Getty Images Back cover photo: WWF-EARPO / John SALEHE Photos: John Salehe, David Maingi and Neil Burgess or as credited. © Graphics (2006) WWF-EARPO. All rights reserved. The material and geographic designations in this report do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of WWF concerning the legal status of any country, territory or area or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers and boundaries. WWF Eastern Africa Regional Programme Office ACS Plaza, Lenana Road P.O. Box 62440-00200 Nairobi, Kenya Tel: +254 20 3877355, 3872630/1 Fax: +254 20 3877389 E-mail: [email protected] Web: www.panda.org/earpo Strategic Framework for Conservation (2005–2025) Contents Acknowledgements......................................................................................................... iv Foreword........................................................................................................................... v Lst of abbrevatons and acronyms.............................................................................. v A new approach to
    [Show full text]
  • PALEOSEISMIC INVESTIGATION of the NORTHERN WEBER SEGMENT of the WASATCH FAULT ZONE at the RICE CREEK TRENCH SITE, NORTH OGDEN, UTAH by Christopher B
    Paleoseismology of Utah, Volume 18 PALEOSEISMIC INVESTIGATION OF THE NORTHERN WEBER SEGMENT OF THE WASATCH FAULT ZONE AT THE RICE CREEK TRENCH SITE, NORTH OGDEN, UTAH by Christopher B. DuRoss, Stephen F. Personius, Anthony J. Crone, Greg N. McDonald, and David J. Lidke SPECIAL STUDY 130 Utah Geological Survey UTAH GEOLOGICAL SURVEY a division of UTAH DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES 2009 Paleoseismology of Utah, Volume 18 PALEOSEISMIC INVESTIGATION OF THE NORTHERN WEBER SEGMENT OF THE WASATCH FAULT ZONE AT THE RICE CREEK TRENCH SITE, NORTH OGDEN, UTAH by Christopher B. DuRoss1, Stephen F. Personius2, Anthony J. Crone2, Greg N. McDonald1, and David J. Lidke2 1Utah Geological Survey 2U.S. Geological Survey Cover photo: Rice Creek trench site; view is to the east. ISBN 1-55791-819-8 SPECIAL STUDY 130 Utah Geological Survey UTAH GEOLOGICAL SURVEY a division of UTAH DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES 2009 STATE OF UTAH Gary R. Herbert, Governor DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES Michael Styler, Executive Director UTAH GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Richard G. Allis, Director PUBLICATIONS contact Natural Resources Map & Bookstore 1594 W. North Temple Salt Lake City, UT 84116 telephone: 801-537-3320 toll-free: 1-888-UTAH MAP Web site: mapstore.utah.gov email: [email protected] UTAH GEOLOGICAL SURVEY contact 1594 W. North Temple, Suite 3110 Salt Lake City, UT 84116 telephone: 801-537-3300 Web site: geology.utah.gov Although this product represents the work of professional scientists, the Utah Department of Natural Resources, Utah Geological Survey, makes no warranty, expressed or implied, regarding its suitability for a particular use. The Utah Department of Natural Resources, Utah Geological Survey, shall not be liable under any circumstances for any direct, indirect, special, incidental, or consequential damages with respect to claims by users of this product.
    [Show full text]
  • Utah's Mighty Five from Salt Lake City
    Utah’s Mighty Five from Salt Lake City Utah’s Mighty Five from Salt Lake City (8 days) Explore five breathtaking national parks: Arches, Canyonlands, Capitol Reef, Bryce Canyon & Zion, also known as Utah's Mighty 5. You’ll get a chance to explore them all on this 8-day guided tour in southern Utah. Join a small group of no more than 14 guests and a private guide on this adventure. Hiking, scenic viewpoints, local eateries, hidden gems, and other fantastic experiences await! Dates October 03 - October 10, 2021 October 10 - October 17, 2021 October 17 - October 24, 2021 October 24 - October 31, 2021 October 31 - November 07, 2021 November 07 - November 14, 2021 November 14 - November 21, 2021 November 21 - November 28, 2021 November 28 - December 05, 2021 December 05 - December 12, 2021 December 12 - December 19, 2021 December 19 - December 26, 2021 December 26 - January 02, 2022 Highlights Small Group Tour 5 National Parks Salt Lake City Hiking Photography Beautiful Scenery Professional Tour Guide Comfortable Transportation 7 Nights Hotel Accommodations 7 Breakfasts, 6 Lunches, 2 Dinners Park Entrance Fees Taxes & Fees Itinerary Day 1: Arrival in Salt Lake City, Utah 1 / 3 Utah’s Mighty Five from Salt Lake City Arrive at the Salt Lake Airport and transfer to the hotel on own by hotel shuttle. The rest of the day is free to explore on your own. Day 2: Canyonlands National Park Depart Salt Lake City, UT at 7:00 am and travel to Canyonlands National Park. Hike to Mesa Arch for an up-close view of one of the most photographed arches in the Southwestern US.
    [Show full text]
  • Grasslands 4/16/03 3:46 PM
    Ecoregion: Grasslands 4/16/03 3:46 PM Grasslands INTRODUCTION About 25% of Earth’s land surface is covered by temperate grassland. These large expanses of flat or hilly country cover much of North America, as well as large areas of Europe, Asia, and South America. Most grasslands are found in the interiors of continents, where there is too little rainfall for a forest but too much rain for a desert. Art Explosion Art Explosion Rolling hills covered with grasses and very few trees A few scattered trees are found on savannas, are typical of North American grassland prairies. tropical grasslands of Africa. Temperate grasslands have subtle differences and different names throughout the world. Prairies and plains of North America are grasslands with tall grasses, while the steppes of Russia are grasslands with short grasses. Veldts are found in South Africa, the puszta in Hungary, and the pampas in Argentina and Uruguay. Savannas are tropical grasslands that support scattered trees and shrubs. They often form a transitional biome file:///Ecoregion/grass/content.html Page 1 of 6 Ecoregion: Grasslands 4/16/03 3:46 PM between deserts and rain forests. Some temperate grasslands are also called savannas. The word savanna comes from the Spanish word zavanna, meaning “treeless plain.” Savannas cover almost half of Africa (mostly central Africa) and large areas of Australia and South America. ABIOTIC DATA The grassland climate is rather dry, averaging about 20 to 100 centimeters (8–40 inches) of precipitation a year. Summers are very hot and may reach 45°C (113°F). Winter temperatures often fall below freezing, which is 0°C (32°F).
    [Show full text]
  • Mountain Goat Unit Management Plan | Wasatch and Central Mountains
    MOUNTAIN GOAT UNIT MANAGEMENT PLAN Wasatch and Central Mountains Lone Peak / Box Elder Peak / Timpanogos / Provo Peak / Nebo August 2019 BOUNDARY DESCRIPTIONS Lone Peak – Salt Lake County: Boundary begins at the junction of I-15 and I-80 in Salt Lake City; east on I-80 to the Salt Lake-Summit county line; south along this county line to the Salt Lake-Wasatch county line; southwest along this county line to the Salt Lake-Utah county line; southwest along this county line to I-15; north on I-15 to I-80 in Salt Lake City. Box Elder Peak – Utah County: Boundary begins at I-15 and the Salt Lake-Utah county line; east along this county line to the Utah-Wasatch county line; south along this county line to “Pole Line Pass” on the Snake Creek-North Fork American Fork Canyon road; west on this road to SR-92; west on SR-92 to I-15; north on I-15 to the Salt Lake-Utah county line. Timpanogos – Utah County: Boundary begins at the junction of SR-92 and SR-146; southeast on SR-92 to US-189; southwest on US-189 to SR-52; west on SR-52 to US-89; north on US-89 to SR-146; north on SR-146 to SR-92. Provo Peak – Utah County: Boundary begins at the junction of I-15 and US-6 at Spanish Fork; north on I-15 to SR-52; east on SR-52 to US-189; northeast on US-189 to the South Fork Drainage of Provo Canyon; east along this drainage bottom to the Berryport trail; south along this trail to the Left Fork of Hobble Creek road; south on this road to the Right Fork of Hobble Creek road; east on this road to Cedar Canyon; south along this canyon bottom to Wanrhodes Canyon; south along this canyon bottom to Diamond Fork Creek; southwest along this creek to US-6; northeast on US-6 to I-15.
    [Show full text]
  • Fact Sheet- Central California Coast Ecoregion
    California State Wildlife Action Plan (SWAP) 2015 Central California Coast Region Annual and Perennial Grassland Habitat About Our Region and the Grassland Habitat Annual grassland habitats are open grasslands composed primarily of annual plant species such as introduced annual grasses and forbs. Annual grasslands also occur as understory plants in Valley Oak Woodland and other habitats. Perennial grassland habitats occur as coastal prairie and interspersed within annual grasslands. Vernal pools also are an important habitat component of many grassland systems. The structure of grasslands depends upon prevailing weather patterns and grazing. A number of wildlife species spend their entire life within grasslands while others use grasslands for foraging and breeding. What are the sensitive species found in the grassland habitat? The following 32 grassland dependent species from this region are found to be sensitive: Amphibian [3] CALIFORNIA TIGER SALAMANDER WESTERN SPADEFOOT RED-LEGGED FROG Reptile [1] BLUNT-NOSED LEOPARD LIZARD Bird [15] BURROWING OWL NORTHERN HARRIER CALIFORNIA CONDOR OREGON VESPER SPARROW GIANT KANGAROO RAT PURPLE MARTIN GRASSHOPPER SPARROW SAND-HILL CRANE GOLDEN EAGLE SHORT-EARED OWL LOGGERHEAD SHRIKE SWAINSON’S HAWK LONG-BILLED CURLEW TRICOLORED BLACKBIRD MOUNTAIN PLOVER Mammal [13] BIG FREE-TAILED BAT PALLID SAN DIEGO POCKET MOUSE CALIFORNIA LEAF-NOSED BAT POCKETED FREE-TAILED BATRINGTAIL HOARY BAT SOUTHERN GRASSHOPPER MOUSE JACUMBA POCKET MOUSE SAN JOAQUIN KIT FOX LONG-EARED MYOTIS TOWNSEND BIG- EARED BAT MAINLAND
    [Show full text]
  • Characterization of Ecoregions of Idaho
    1 0 . C o l u m b i a P l a t e a u 1 3 . C e n t r a l B a s i n a n d R a n g e Ecoregion 10 is an arid grassland and sagebrush steppe that is surrounded by moister, predominantly forested, mountainous ecoregions. It is Ecoregion 13 is internally-drained and composed of north-trending, fault-block ranges and intervening, drier basins. It is vast and includes parts underlain by thick basalt. In the east, where precipitation is greater, deep loess soils have been extensively cultivated for wheat. of Nevada, Utah, California, and Idaho. In Idaho, sagebrush grassland, saltbush–greasewood, mountain brush, and woodland occur; forests are absent unlike in the cooler, wetter, more rugged Ecoregion 19. Grazing is widespread. Cropland is less common than in Ecoregions 12 and 80. Ecoregions of Idaho The unforested hills and plateaus of the Dissected Loess Uplands ecoregion are cut by the canyons of Ecoregion 10l and are disjunct. 10f Pure grasslands dominate lower elevations. Mountain brush grows on higher, moister sites. Grazing and farming have eliminated The arid Shadscale-Dominated Saline Basins ecoregion is nearly flat, internally-drained, and has light-colored alkaline soils that are Ecoregions denote areas of general similarity in ecosystems and in the type, quality, and America into 15 ecological regions. Level II divides the continent into 52 regions Literature Cited: much of the original plant cover. Nevertheless, Ecoregion 10f is not as suited to farming as Ecoregions 10h and 10j because it has thinner soils.
    [Show full text]
  • References a - B
    References A - B References BIBLIOGRAPHY Addley, Craig, Bethany Neilson, Leon Basdekas, and Thomas Hardy. 2005. Virgin River Temperature Model Validation (Draft). Institute for Natural Systems Engineering, Utah Water Research Laboratory, Utah State University, Logan, UT: Utah State University. Alder, Douglas D., and Karl F. Brooks. 1996. A History of Washington County: From Isolation to Destination. Salt Lake City, Utah: Utah State Historical Society. Aliison, James R. 2000. “Craft Specialization and Exchange in Small-Scale Societies: A Virgin Anasazi Case Study.” Unpublished PhD diss., Arizona State University. Allison, James R. 1990. “Anasazi Subsistence in the St. George Basin, Southwestern Utah.” Unpublished Master’s Thesis, Brigham Young University. Altschul, J. H., and H. C. Fairley. 1989. Man, Models, and Management: An Overview of the Arizona Strip and the Management of its Cultural Resources. St. George, UT: U.S. Forest Service and Bureau of Land Management. Arizona-Sonoran Desert Museum. 2015. “Western Banded Gecko.” Accessed February. http.//www.desertmuseum. org/books/nhsd_banded-gecko.php. Audubon. 2015. “Ferruginous Hawk.” Accessed February. http://www.audubon.org/field-guide/bird/ ferruginous-hawk. Audubon. 2015. “Burrowing Owl.” Accessed February. http://www.audubon.org/field-guide/bird/burrowing-owl. Audubon and Cornell Lab of Ornithology. 2013. “Range and Point Map.” Accessed November. http://www.ebird.org/ content/ebird/html. Brennan, Thomas C. 2014. “Online Field Guide to The Reptiles and Amphibians of Arizona.” Accesed October 23. http://www.retilesofaz.org/html. Bernales, Heather H., Justin Dolling, and Kevin Bunnel. 2009. Utah Cougar Annual Report 2009. Salt Lake City: Utah Division of Wildlife Resources. Bernales, Heather H., Justin Dolling, and Kevin Bunnel.
    [Show full text]
  • Notice Concerning Copyright Restrictions
    NOTICE CONCERNING COPYRIGHT RESTRICTIONS This document may contain copyrighted materials. These materials have been made available for use in research, teaching, and private study, but may not be used for any commercial purpose. Users may not otherwise copy, reproduce, retransmit, distribute, publish, commercially exploit or otherwise transfer any material. The copyright law of the United States (Title 17, United States Code) governs the making of photocopies or other reproductions of copyrighted material. Under certain conditions specified in the law, libraries and archives are authorized to furnish a photocopy or other reproduction. One of these specific conditions is that the photocopy or reproduction is not to be "used for any purpose other than private study, scholarship, or research." If a user makes a request for, or later uses, a photocopy or reproduction for purposes in excess of "fair use," that user may be liable for copyright infringement. This institution reserves the right to refuse to accept a copying order if, in its judgment, fulfillment of the order would involve violation of copyright law. Geothermal Resources Council, TRANSACTIONS Vol. 4, September 1980 SUBSURFACE GEOLOGY OF THE RAFT RIVER GEOTHERMAL AREA, IDAHO H. R. Covington U.S. Geological Survey Box 25046, Denver Federal Center Denver, CO 80225 ABSTRACT . northward onto the Snake River Plain and is flanked on the east by the Sublette and Black Pine The Raft River Valley occupies an upper Mountains, on the west by the Jim Sage and Cenozoic structural basin filled with nearly Cotterel Mountains and on the south by the Raft 1,600 m of fluvial silt, sand, and gravel.
    [Show full text]