DOCSLIB.ORG

Conceptual Writing and Fanfiction” © 2013 by Darren Wershler “Blurring the Lines” © 2013 by Amber Benson

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

ANNE JAMISON Why Fanfiction is Taking Over the World An Imprint of BenBella Books, Inc. Dallas, TX All rights reserved. No part of this book may be used or reproduced in any man- ner whatsoever without written permission except in the case of brief quotations embodied in critical articles or reviews. Copyright © 2013 by Anne Jamison Smart Pop is an imprint of BenBella Books, Inc. 10300 N. Central Expressway, Suite 530 Dallas, TX 75231 www.benbellabooks.com www.smartpopbooks.com Send feedback to [email protected] Printed in the United States of America 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data is available for this title. 978-1-937856-83-0 Copyediting by James Fraleigh Proofreading by Chris Gage and Brittany Dowdle Text design and composition by John Reinhardt Book Design Printed by Bang Printing Distributed by Perseus Distribution www.perseusdistribution.com To place orders through Perseus Distribution: Tel: 800-343-4499 Fax: 800-351-5073 E-mail: [email protected] Significant discounts for bulk sales are available. Please contact Glenn Yeffeth at [email protected] or 214-750-3628. ii iii Introduction © 2013 by Lev Grossman “Mad as a Box of Frogs” © 2013 by Wendy C. Fries “Fables of Irish Fandom” © 2013 by Andy Sawyer “Recollections of a Collating Party” © 2013 by Jacqueline Lichtenberg “Literary Playtime” © 2013 by Ron Hogan “Mulder/Scully versus the G-Woman and the Fowl One” © 2013 by Bethan Jones “Fic U” © 2013 by Jen Zern “An Excerpt from Percy Weasley’s University Thesis” © 2013 by Chris Rankin “How Harry Potter Fanfic Changed the World (Or at Least the Internet)” © 2013 by Heidi Tandy “Twilight’s True Believers” © 2013 by Jolie Fontenot “A Million Words” © 2013 by Lauren Billings “On Writing—and Being—a Mary Sue” © 2013 by Cyndy Aleo “Becoming Bella Swan” © 2013 by Randi Flannagan “The Fandom Gives Back” © 2013 by Christina Hobbs and Lauren Billings “Bittersweet” © 2013 by Tish Beaty “Fifty Shades of Gold” © 2013 by Andrew Shaffer “Just Change the Names” © 2013 by Tiffany Reisz “Preying for More” © 2013 by Rachel Caine “An Archive of Our Own” © 2013 by Francesca Coppa “The Epic Love Story of Supernatural and Fanfic” © 2013 by Jules Wilkinson “Pon Farr, Mpreg, Bonds, and the Rise of the Omegaverse” © 2013 by Kristina Busse “Real Person(a) Fiction” © 2013 by V. Arrow “#BradamForever” © 2013 by Brad Bell “Hobbyhorsing” © 2013 by Peter Berg “From a Land Where ‘Other’ People Live” © 2013 by Rukmini Pande and Samira Nadkarni “Conceptual Writing and Fanfiction” © 2013 by Darren Wershler “Blurring the Lines” © 2013 by Amber Benson Contents Foreword • Lev Grossman Introduction The Theory of Narrative Causality Why Fic? PART ONE Writing from Sources A Prehistory of Fanfiction The Sherlock Holmes Material: A Study in Fanfic The Early Adventures of the Apocryphal Sherlock Holmes Mad as a Box of Frogs • Wendy C. Fries (Atlin Merrick) “Love Is a Much More Vicious Motivator” The Slasher Who Is Not One (An Interview with Katie Forsythe and wordstrings) PART TWO A Selective History of Media Fandom Science Fiction, Star Trek, and the Birth of Media Fandom Fables of Irish Fandom • Andy Sawyer I Am Woman, Read My Fic Recollections of a Collating Party • Jacqueline Lichtenberg Interlude: Growing Up Fic Literary Playtime • Ron Hogan The X-Files, Buffy, and the Rise of the Internet Fic Fandoms The X-Philes v vi fic Mulder/Scully versus the G-Woman and the Fowl One • Bethan Jones The Bronze Age Fic U • Jen Zern (NautiBitz) Megafandoms: Harry Potter and Twilight An Excerpt from Percy Weasley’s University Thesis • Chris Rankin How Harry Potter Fanfic Changed the World (Or at Least the Internet) • Heidi Tandy (Heidi8) The Twilight Fandom Twilight’s True Believers • Jolie Fontenot A Million Words • Lauren Billings (LolaShoes) An Interview with tby789 (Christina Hobbs) On Writing—and Being—a Mary Sue • Cyndy Aleo (algonquinrt/ d0tpark3r) Becoming Bella Swan • Randi Flannagan (BellaFlan) The Fandom Gives Back • Christina Lauren (Christina Hobbs/tby789 and Lauren Billings/Lolashoes) Snowqueens Icedragon (E. L. James) and Sebastien Robichaud (Sylvain Reynard): A 2010 Fandom Exchange Anatomy of a Flame War Bittersweet • Tish Beaty (his_tweet) PART THREE Fic and Publishing An Interview with Eurydice Fifty Shades of Gold • Andrew Shaffer The Briar Patch Just Change the Names • Tiffany Reisz Preying for More • Rachel Caine PART FOUR Fanwriting Today An Archive of Our Own • Francesca Coppa The Epic Love Story of Supernatural and Fanfic • Jules Wilkinson (missyjack) CONTENTS vii Pon Farr, Mpreg, Bonds, and the Rise of the Omegaverse • Kristina Busse Real Person(a) Fiction • V. Arrow (aimmyarrowshigh) #BradamForever • Brad Bell Hobbyhorsing • Peter Berg (Homfrog) From a Land Where “Other” People Live • Rukmini Pande and Samira Nadkarni PART FIVE Fanfiction and Writers Who Don’t Write Fanfiction Conceptual Writing and Fanfiction • Darren Wershler An Interview with Douglas Wright An Interview with Jonathan Lethem Blurring the Lines • Amber Benson Acknowledgements About the Author About the Contributors Endnotes Index Darren Wershler is an experimental poet, essayist, and cultural critic. Best known for The Iron Whim: A Fragmented History of Typewrit- ing, he is also Research Chair in Media and Contemporary Literature at Concordia University, where he is currently developing and curating an online archive of publicly licensed Canadian art. Darren has been active on the forefront of what’s come to be known as conceptual writing—a contemporary movement in avant-garde literature that involves copying, manipulating, reformatting, and otherwise appropriating found text. Aside from using material in ways that often occupy a legal gray area, what can fanfic have in common with the avant-garde? Are there ways in which this avant-garde is fannish? This essay considers how these very different writing and interpretive communities have evolved in relation to digital media, the mainstream literary establishment, and their own marginal status. Conceptual Writing as Fanfiction Darren Wershler Conceptual Writing and Fanfiction are the Bearded Spocks of their respective universes. If you’re reading this book, you probably already know more about fan- fiction than I do. What I know about is a thing called conceptual writing. And I think that one useful way to think about conceptual writing is as fanfiction about conceptual art. Another might be to say that, in neighboring universes that overlap slightly, both fanfiction and conceptual writing play the role of bearded Spock. What I want to consider in this brief essay is the value of a kind of forced cultural exchange. In the event of an unexpected ion storm and a transporter accident, or its prose equivalent, is there anything useful that writers of fanfiction and conceptual writing might learn from each 333 334 fic other? It’ll take me a few hundred words to get to the point where we can find out. Conceptual writing is a term that has come to describe the work that my friends and I have produced over the last dozen years. One major exam- ple is Kenneth Goldsmith’s Day, which consists of the entire text from the September 1, 2000 issue of the New York Times—stock quotes, ads, cap- tions, and all—reset in 9-point type, reproduced line by line, and bound as a massive paperback book, with Goldsmith listed as the author.131 In more general terms, conceptual writing is a catchall description for a mixed bag of writing techniques used by people who are interested in the impact of networked digital media on the creative process, the social function of authorship, and the economy of publishing. This sort of writing is fannish in the sense that it draws much of its inspiration from things that were happening in the art world from the mid-1960s to the late 1970s. Conceptual art is a big, complex category, but Alexander Alberro usefully describes it in terms of four major “tra- jectories”: a deemphasizing of the importance of the artist’s technical skill and the cohesiveness of the final product; an increasing emphasis on the importance of text over images; a shift away from the aesthetically pleas- ing toward the conveyance of that odd modern invention we call informa- tion; and a questioning of how art is “supposed” to be framed, and the notion that there is a “correct” context (like a gallery) in which people are supposed to encounter it (pp. xvi, xvii ).132 Conceptual writing fol- lows these trajectories because, with a few exceptions, they had been largely ignored by literary writers. Before there was a clear consensus about what it was or what it was going to be called, what conceptual writing did was to draw attention to the rhetorical aspects of writing that canonical literature usually neglects: weather reports, legal transcripts, social media feeds, stock quotes, Use- net posts, and so on. These texts are the “dark matter” of literature; they make up the bulk of everything that’s written, but we habitually pretend that they don’t matter in any capacity other than the moment. John Guillory describes such texts as belonging to what he calls “information genres.” In order to use them to convey that peculiar mod- ern invention we call “information,” we have to pretend that they have no rhetorical value of their own that might taint it.133 By repackaging great swaths of information in media and formats other than the ones in FANFICTION AND Writers Who Don’t Write FANFICTION 335 which it initially appeared— again, think about Goldsmith reformatting the New York Times as a book—conceptual writing drew attention to the fact that all writing is poetic. It is poetic in that it always says more than we intend, and we assign value to it in keeping with large sets of external factors that sometimes have little to do with the ostensible content.
Recommended publications
  • Gender and Consent in Supernatural Fanfiction's Alpha/Beta/Omega

    Gender and Consent in Supernatural Fanfiction's Alpha/Beta/Omega

    i Just Go Find Yourself a Nice Alpha: Gender and Consent in Supernatural Fanfiction’s Alpha/Beta/Omega Universe by Tessa Barone A THESIS submitted to Oregon State University Honors College in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Honors Baccalaureate of Arts in English (Honors Scholar) Honors Baccalaureate of Arts in History (Honors Scholar) Presented May 28, 2019 Commencement June 2019 ii iii AN ABSTRACT OF THE THESIS OF Tessa Barone for the degree of Honors Baccalaureate of Arts in English and Honors Baccalaureate Arts in History presented on May 28, 2019. Title: Just Go Find Yourself a Nice Alpha: Gender and Consent in Supernatural Fanfiction’s Alpha/Beta/Omega Universe. Abstract approved:_____________________________________________________ Rebecca Olson Shows, books, and media are constantly negotiating power with their fans. Who decides what is canon? To whom does the story belong?? The answer has traditionally been in favor of producers. However, in the age of the internet, fans now hold considerably more power than they ever have before, and some shows, like the CW’s Supernatural, respond by participating in “fanservice.” Many fans of this show strongly support slash and incest pairings, and by allowing such interpretations to be acknowledged in the narrative Supernatural makes increasingly transgressive readings available to the audience. The trope known as “Alpha/Beta/Omega Dynamics” is extremely popular, borderline pornographic, and virtually eradicates women from the narrative—instead depicting a relationship between men that is highly heterosexual in dynamic. This trope deconstructs the gender binary by assigning gender roles based on behavior, rather than biology, and appeals to an animal code of ethics in order to indulge in problematic, sexist, and abusive sexual situations.
  • Book Self-Publishing Best Practices

    Book Self-Publishing Best Practices

    Montana Tech Library Digital Commons @ Montana Tech Graduate Theses & Non-Theses Student Scholarship Fall 2019 Book Self-Publishing Best Practices Erica Jansma Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.mtech.edu/grad_rsch Part of the Communication Commons Book Self-Publishing Best Practices by Erica Jansma A project submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of M.S. Technical Communication Montana Tech 2019 ii Abstract I have taken a manuscript through the book publishing process to produce a camera-ready print book and e-book. This includes copyediting, designing layout templates, laying out the document in InDesign, and producing an index. My research is focused on the best practices and standards for publishing. Lessons learned from my research and experience include layout best practices, particularly linespacing and alignment guidelines, as well as the limitations and capabilities of InDesign, particularly its endnote functionality. Based on the results of this project, I can recommend self-publishers to understand the software and distribution platforms prior to publishing a book to ensure the required specifications are met to avoid complications later in the process. This document provides details on many of the software, distribution, and design options available for self-publishers to consider. Keywords: self-publishing, publishing, books, ebooks, book design, layout iii Dedication I dedicate this project to both of my grandmothers. I grew up watching you work hard, sacrifice, trust, and love with everything you have; it was beautiful; you are beautiful; and I hope I can model your example with a fraction of your grace and fruitfulness. Thank you for loving me so well.
  • Digital Fanfic in Negotiation: Livejournal, Archive of Our Own, and the Affordances of Read-Write Platforms

    Digital Fanfic in Negotiation: Livejournal, Archive of Our Own, and the Affordances of Read-Write Platforms

    Digital fanfic in negotiation: LiveJournal, Archive of our Own, and the affordances of read-write platforms. Introduction Fanfiction is the unauthorized rewriting or adaptation of popular media narratives, utilizing corporately owned characters, settings and storylines to tell an individual writer’s own story (self-ref, 2017). It is often abbreviated to fanfic or even fic, and exists in a thoroughly grey legal area between copyright infringement and fair use (Tushnet 1997, McCardle 2011). Though there were a few cases of cease-and-desist letters sent to fan writers in the twentieth century, media corporations now understand it is useless to attempt to prosecute fanfic writers – for one thing, there are simply too many of us,1 and for another it would be terrible publicity. Though modern fanfic can be reliably dated to the 1960s (Jenkins 1992), it is now primarily an online practice, and the fastest growing form of writing in the world (self ref). This paper uses participant observation and online ethnography to explore how fanfiction archives utilize digital affordances. Following Murray, I will argue that a robust understanding of digital read-write platforms needs to account for the social and legal context of digital fiction as well as its technological affordances. Whilst the online platform LiveJournal in some ways channels user creativity towards a more self-evidentially ‘digital’ texts than its successor in the Archive of Our Own (A03), the Archive encourages greater reader interactivity at the level of archive and sorting. I will demonstrate that in some ways, the A03 recoups some of the cultural capital and use value of print.
  • Front Matter Template

    Front Matter Template

    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by UT Digital Repository Copyright by Birch Griesse 2019 The Report Committee for Birch Griesse Certifies that this is the approved version of the following Report: Mediating Conflicting Values in a Community Archives Setting APPROVED BY SUPERVISING COMMITTEE: Amelia Acker, Supervisor Patricia K. Galloway Mediating Conflicting Values in a Community Archives Setting by Birch Griesse Report Presented to the Faculty of the Graduate School of The University of Texas at Austin in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Science in Information Studies The University of Texas at Austin May 2019 Acknowledgements I would like to thank Dr. Amelia Acker for her hard work in helping me navigate the process of researching and writing this report, including helping me overcome several obstacles along the way. I would also like to thank my mother, Janet Titus, for her continuous love and support. iv Abstract Mediating Conflicting Values in a Community Archives Setting Birch Griesse, M.S. Info. St. The University of Texas at Austin, 2019 Supervisor: Amelia Acker This report examines conflicts within the user community of the online fanwork repository Archive of Our Own (AO3). The site is a nonprofit venture with the ambitious goal of serving the large heterogeneous community of fandom writ large. Tensions among subsets of the Archive’s user group have flared up at various points in its ten-year history, forcing its volunteer-based staff into the position of arbiter of community values. These conflicting values have influenced, sometimes asymmetrically, the functionality of the Archive and are now embedded in its design.
  • The 2021 Guide to Manuscript Publishers

    The 2021 Guide to Manuscript Publishers

    Publish Authors Emily Harstone Authors Publish The 2021 Guide to Manuscript Publishers 230 Traditional Publishers No Agent Required Emily Harstone This book is copyright 2021 Authors Publish Magazine. Do not distribute. Corrections, complaints, compliments, criticisms? Contact [email protected] More Books from Emily Harstone The Authors Publish Guide to Manuscript Submission Submit, Publish, Repeat: How to Publish Your Creative Writing in Literary Journals The Authors Publish Guide to Memoir Writing and Publishing The Authors Publish Guide to Children’s and Young Adult Publishing Courses & Workshops from Authors Publish Workshop: Manuscript Publishing for Novelists Workshop: Submit, Publish, Repeat The Novel Writing Workshop With Emily Harstone The Flash Fiction Workshop With Ella Peary Free Lectures from The Writers Workshop at Authors Publish The First Twenty Pages: How to Win Over Agents, Editors, and Readers in 20 Pages Taming the Wild Beast: Making Inspiration Work For You Writing from Dreams: Finding the Flashpoint for Compelling Poems and Stories Table of Contents Table of Contents .......................................................................................................... 5 Introduction ................................................................................................................. 13 Nonfiction Publishers.................................................................................................. 19 Arcade Publishing ..................................................................................................
  • Fabjob Guide to Become a Book Publisher

    Fabjob Guide to Become a Book Publisher

    Start your own publishing company! FabJob Guide to Become a Book Publisher Jennifer Fishberg Visit www.FabJob.com FabJob Guide to Become a Book Publisher Contents About the Author .............................................................................8 Acknowledgements .........................................................................9 1. Introduction ..........................................................................................10 1.1 The Book Publishing Business ....................................................12 1.1.1 What Is Independent Publishing? ....................................12 1.1.2 Industry Trends and Statistics ..........................................15 1.2 Benefits of Being a Book Publisher ............................................17 1.3 Inside This Guide .........................................................................20 2. Getting Ready .......................................................................................23 2.1 Skills and Knowledge You Will Need .......................................23 2.1.1 Writing Skills .......................................................................24 2.1.2 Computer and Technology Skills .....................................25 2.1.3 Research Skills .....................................................................27 2.1.4 Interpersonal Skills .............................................................29 2.1.5 Business Skills .....................................................................31 2.2 Learning by Doing .......................................................................34
  • K-Pop Idols of K-Pop Fans in Thailand

    K-Pop Idols of K-Pop Fans in Thailand

    ปัจจัยที่ส่งผลให้แฟนเคป๊อปชาวไทยนิยมเขียนแฟนฟิคชันศิลปินไอดอลเคป๊อป แนวชายรักชายหรือหญิงรักหญิง THE MOTIVATING FACTORS OF WRITING SLASH FANFICTION OF K-POP IDOLS OF K-POP FANS IN THAILAND ปัจจัยที่ส่งผลให้แฟนเคป๊อปชาวไทยนิยมเขียนแฟนฟิคชันศิลปินไอดอลเคป๊อปแนวชายรักชาย หรือหญิงรักหญิง THE MOTIVATING FACTORS OF WRITING SLASH FANFICTION OF K-POP IDOLS OF K-POP FANS IN THAILAND นันท์นภัส กิจธรรมเชษฐ์ วิทยานิพนธ์นี้เป็นส่วนหนึ่งของการศึกษาตามหลักสูตร นิเทศศาสตรมหาบัณฑิต สาขาวิชาการสื่อสารการตลาดดิจิทัล มหาวิทยาลัยกรุงเทพ ปีการศึกษา 2561 © 2561 นันท์นภัส กิจธรรมเชษฐ์ สงวนลิขสิทธิ์ ฉ กิตติกรรมประกาศ วิทยานิพนธ์ฉบับนี้เดินทางมาถึงยังจุดหมายปลายทางได้ด้วยความกรุณาอย่างสูงของ ผศ.ดร.ปฐมา สตะเวทิน อาจารย์ที่ปรึกษาวิทยานิพนธ์ที่ให้ความใส่ใจและค าชี้แนะในการท า วิทยานิพนธ์แก่ผู้วิจัยด้วยความตั้งใจดีเสมอมา ผู้วิจัยตระหนักรู้ถึงความทุ่มเทและความตั้งใจดีของ อาจารย์อยู่เสมอและขอกราบขอบพระคุณอาจารย์ด้วยความซาบซึ้งใจเป็นอย่างสูงไว้ ณ ที่นี้ ขอขอบพระคุณอาจารย์ที่ปรึกษาร่วม รศ.ดร.โยธิน แสวงดี รวมถึง ผศ.ดร.ธรรญธร ปัญญ โสภณ และ ผศ.ดร.วรัชญ์ ครุจิต ที่กรุณาเป็นกรรมการสอบวิทยานิพนธ์ ตลอดจนให้ค าแนะน าจน วิทยานิพนธ์ฉบับนี้ส าเร็จลุล่วงได้ในที่สุด ขอขอบพระคุณผู้ให้สัมภาษณ์ทั้ง 11 ท่านที่สละเวลาและมอบข้อมูลอันเป็นประโยชน์และมี ค่ายิ่งแก่วิทยานิพนธ์ฉบับนี้จนท าให้วิทยานิพนธ์ฉบับนี้ส าเร็จลุล่วงตามวัตถุประสงค์ ขอบคุณเพื่อน นักเรียนไทยในเกาหลีทุกคนที่คอยตอบค าถามมากมายเกี่ยวกับวงการเคป๊อป ขอบคุณเจ้าหนูมารีมีลูก แมวเหมียวที่ช่วยอธิบายค าศัพท์ภาษาญี่ปุ่นที่จ าเป็นให้อยู่หลายครั้งหลายครา ขอบคุณเพื่อนๆพี่ๆ น้องๆนักศึกษาภาควิชาการสื่อสารการตลาดดิจิทัล รุ่นที่1 ทุกคนที่คอยให้ก
  • Small Presses in the 21 Century Exploring Independent Publishing

    Small Presses in the 21 Century Exploring Independent Publishing

    Small Presses in the 21st Century Exploring Independent Publishing Houses and the Communities They Build by Katherine Kosinski A thesis presented for the B.A. degree with Honors in The Department of English University of Michigan Winter 2012 © 2012 Katherine Kosinski Acknowledgments I would like to thank my advisor Petra Kuppers for all the support she has given me in the course of the thesis experience; it was truly invaluable. She succeeded in giving me constructive and helpful advice while keeping me on track emotionally and academically. I would also like to thank Jennifer Wenzel. The editing and guidance she performed over the course of the year were definitely integral to the completion of my thesis. Many other people have aided me during my thesis writing, and as such I would like to thank. John Whittier-Ferguson, Brian Whitener, Paulina Alberto, Paloma Celis Carbajal, Steven Gillis, Dan Wickett, Lucy Hartley, Tung-Hui “Hui-Hui” Hu, the Cartonera publishers in Latin America, the English Honors 2012 Cohort, and the Dossin Family. All helped me in with my research, the organization of my thesis, or simply lent a supportive hand in a time of need. Finally, I would like to thank my mother, Alice Kosinski, for encouraging me throughout the entire journey. © Abstract The publishing industry has been labeled as being in a time of flux in the years following the turn of the 21st century; its future is considered uncertain and as such, rumors of demise and great change abound. This thesis works to calm fears and worries of the digital transition of literature by documenting the work of certain small presses in this time of change.
  • Sameness Attracts, Novelty Disturbs, but Outliers Flourish in Fanfiction

    Sameness Attracts, Novelty Disturbs, but Outliers Flourish in Fanfiction

    SAMENESS ATTRACTS,NOVELTY DISTURBS, BUT OUTLIERS FLOURISH IN FANFICTION ONLINE APREPRINT Elise Jing1, Simon DeDeo2, and Yong-Yeol Ahn3 1Department of Informatics, Indiana University 2Social and Decision Sciences, Dietrich College, Carnegie Mellon University 3Department of Informatics, Indiana University April 17, 2019 ABSTRACT The nature of what people enjoy is not just a central question for the creative industry, it is a driving force of cultural evolution. It is widely believed that successful cultural products balance novelty and conventionality: they provide something familiar but at least somewhat divergent from what has come before, and occupy a satisfying middle ground between “more of the same” and “too strange”. We test this belief using a large dataset of over half a million works of fanfiction from the website Archive of Our Own (AO3), looking at how the recognition a work receives varies with its novelty. We quantify the novelty through a term-based language model, and a topic model, in the context of existing works within the same fandom. Contrary to the balance theory, we find that the lowest-novelty are the most popular and that popularity declines monotonically with novelty. A few exceptions can be found: extremely popular works that are among the highest novelty within the fandom. Taken together, our findings not only challenge the traditional theory of the hedonic value of novelty, they invert it: people prefer the least novel things, are repelled by the middle ground, and have an occasional enthusiasm for extreme outliers. It suggests that cultural evolution must work against inertia — the appetite people have to continually reconsume the familiar, and may resemble a punctuated equilibrium rather than a smooth evolution.
  • What Does Gender Mean in Regendered Characters

    What Does Gender Mean in Regendered Characters

    What Does Gender Mean in Regendered Characters Author Baker, Lucy Published 2017-12-31 Thesis Type Thesis (PhD Doctorate) School School of Hum, Lang & Soc Sc DOI https://doi.org/10.25904/1912/2211 Copyright Statement The author owns the copyright in this thesis, unless stated otherwise. Downloaded from http://hdl.handle.net/10072/380299 Griffith Research Online https://research-repository.griffith.edu.au WHAT DOES GENDER MEAN IN REGENDERED CHARACTERS Ms Lucy Irene Baker, BA (Hons), MAppSci(Lib&InfoMgmt) School of Humanities, Languages, and Social Science Griffith University Submitted in fulfilment of the requirements of the degree of Doctor of Philosophy 31 December 2017 21 Abstract This thesis examines the ways regendering, or ‘genderswapping’, is performed as an adaptational creative choice for fans and creators. Regendered works, such as the TV series Elementary, illustrate the complexity of representation, and the ongoing imbalanced landscape of media. I develop a more cohesive understanding of the fannish counterpublic and its complex approaches to creativity and gender by grounding the research and data collection in fan studies, gender studies, and literary theory. This thesis uses interviews, surveys, and observations of fannish communities, and close readings of regendered texts and media, to develop two theories of regendered effects. One: the position of regendered work within fannish counterpublics is one centred on the conflicts and tensions between lived experiences and the media landscape, performed through the creative forms that characterise their communities. Fannish experiences of gender and sexuality influence their reception of those works, and how they practice regendering as a creative process. Two: these works then reinforce that counterpublic by correcting the gender imbalance of the initial work, and re-othering the expectations of that work.
  • The Internet As Playground and Factory November 12–14, 2009 at the New School, New York City

    The Internet As Playground and Factory November 12–14, 2009 at the New School, New York City

    FIRST IN A SERIES OF BIENNIAL CONFERENCES ABOUT THE POLITICS OF DIGITAL MEDIA THE INTERNET AS PLAYGROUND AND FACTORY NOVEMBER 12–14, 2009 AT THE NEW SCHOOL, NEW YORK CITY www.digitallabor.org The conference is sponsored by Eugene Lang College The New School for Liberal Arts and presented in cooperation with the Center for Transformative Media at Parsons The New School for Design, Yale Information Society Project, 16 Beaver Group, The New School for Social Research, The Change You Want To See, The Vera List Center for Art and Politics, New York University’s Council for Media and Culture, and n+1 Magazine. Acknowledgements General Event Support Lula Brown, Alison Campbell, Alex Cline, Conference Director Patrick Fannon, Keith Higgons, Geoff Trebor Scholz Kim, Ellen-Maria Leijonhufvud, Stephanie Lotshaw, Brie Manakul, Lindsey Medeiros, Executive Conference Production Farah Momin, Heather Potts, Katharine Trebor Scholz, Larry Jackson Relth, Jesse Ricke, Joumana Seikaly, Ndelea Simama, Andre Singleton, Lisa Conference Production Taber, Yamberlie Tavarez, Brandon Tonner- Deepthie Welaratna, Farah Momin, Connolly, Jolita Valakaite, Cynthia Wang, Julia P. Carrillo Deepthi Welaratna, Tatiana Zwerling Production of Video Series Voices from Registration Staff The Internet as Playground and Factory Alison Campbell, Alex Cline, Keith Higgons, Assal Ghawami Geoff Kim, Stephanie Lotshaw, Brie Manakul, Overture Video Lindsey Medeiros, Heather Potts, Jesse Assal Ghawami Ricke, Joumana Seikaly, Andre Singleton, Deepthi Welaratna, Tatiana Zwerling Video
  • Defamiliarization: Flarf, Conceptual Writing, and Using Flawed Software Tools As Creative Partners Richard P. Gabriel*

    Defamiliarization: Flarf, Conceptual Writing, and Using Flawed Software Tools As Creative Partners Richard P. Gabriel*

    Knowledge Management & E-Learning: An International Journal, Vol.4, No.2. 134 Defamiliarization: Flarf, conceptual writing, and using flawed software tools as creative partners Richard P. Gabriel* IBM Research 3636 Altamont Way, Redwood City CA 94062, USA E-mail: [email protected]; [email protected] *Corresponding author Abstract: One form of creativity uses defamiliarization, a mechanism that frees the brain from its rational shackles and permits the abducing brain to run free. Mistakes and flaws in several software tools are shown to be the starting points for increased creativity and better art, and a theory explaining the phenomenon is proposed. Keywords: Writing; Poetry; Creativity; Flarf Biographical notes: Richard P. Gabriel received a PhD in Computer Science from Stanford University in 1981, and an MFA in Poetry from Warren Wilson College in 1998. He has been a researcher at Stanford University, company president and Chief Technical Officer at Lucid, Inc., vice president of Development at ParcPlace-Digitalk, a management consultant for several startups, a Distinguished Engineer at Sun Microsystems, and Consulting Professor of Computer Science at Stanford University. He is an ACM Fellow. He is a researcher at IBM Research, looking into the architecture, design, and implementation of extraordinarily large, self-sustaining systems as well as development techniques for building them. Until recently he was President of the Hillside Group, a nonprofit that nurtures the software patterns community by holding conferences, publishing books,