DOCSLIB.ORG

Great Recession: Recipients and Their Post-Claim Outcomes

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Great Recession: Recipients and Their Post-Claim Outcomes FINAL REPORT Additional Unemployment Compensation Benefits During the Great Recession: Recipients and Their Post-Claim Outcomes MARCH 02, 2016 Heinrich Hock Walter Nicholson Karen Needels Joanne Lee Priyanka Anand Submitted to: U.S. Department of Labor Chief Evaluation Office 200 Constitution Ave NW, Suite S-2312 Washington, DC 20210 Project Officer: Jonathan Simonetta Submitted by: Mathematica Policy Research 1100 1st Street, NE 12th Floor Washington, DC 20002-4221 Telephone: (202) 484-9220 Facsimile: (202) 863-1763 Reference Number: 40232.940 This page has been left blank for double-sided copying. ADDITIONAL UC BENEFITS DURING THE GREAT RECESSION MATHEMATICA POLICY RESEARCH DISCLAIMER This report was prepared for the U.S. Department of Labor (DOL), Office of the Assistant Secretary for Policy, Chief Evaluation Office by Mathematica Policy Research, under contract number DOLU139634580. The views expressed are those of the authors and should not be attributed to DOL, nor does mention of trade names, commercial products, or organizations imply endorsement of same by the U.S. Government. iii This page has been left blank for double-sided copying. ADDITIONAL UC BENEFITS DURING THE GREAT RECESSION MATHEMATICA POLICY RESEARCH ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS We would like to thank the Deputy Chief Evaluation Officer at the U.S. Department of Labor (DOL), Jonathan Simonetta, who provided guidance throughout this study. In addition, Rob Pavosevich, Ron Wilus, and other staff at the Employment and Training Administration’s Office of Unemployment Insurance (OUI), provided important feedback at critical junctures. The design of this study also benefited greatly from comments from a technical working group that included Richard Hobbie, Doug Holmes, Stephen Woodbury, George Wentworth, and Till van Wachter. We also wish to thank the many individuals who helped ensure the availability of high- quality data for this study. At OUI, the Administrator, Gay Gilbert, and the State Conformity and Compliance Team established the basis for this study’s use of confidential administrative unemployment compensation (UC) data. Technical and program staff in 20 states worked with us extensively to fulfill our request for their administrative data, while legal staff help refine data- sharing agreements permitting use of it for this study. We also owe a debt of gratitude to the UC recipients who patiently answered our survey questions about their experiences. A large number of staff at Mathematica also made important contributions to this study. Grace Roemer and Brandon Kyler worked tirelessly to secure administrative data from the states. A team of statisticians led by Frank Potter, with support from Sheng Wang and Yuhong Zheng, helped thoughtfully design and adapt the study’s approach to selecting analysis samples and calculating analytic weights. The survey was skillfully directed by Patricia Nemeth, who led efforts to develop the questionnaire and design the fielding methodology. She also oversaw the implementation of the survey and day-to-day survey operations, along with Linda Mendenko, the deputy survey director, and Ryan McInerney. April Villone was the systems analyst who managed the sample release, and Alice Ng managed the survey information system. Tong Li programmed the complex logic of the multimode survey instrument, with the able assistance of Ann Ponti. Hugo Andrade and Mike Smith supervised the telephone interviewing effort, and they developed and refined strategies for locating hard-to-reach respondents. Hong Zhang created survey operations reports and led the programming/coding of the final survey data. We are also grateful to the many telephone interviewers who were involved in the data collection effort. Liz Potamites, Emma Kopa, Chris Rankin, and Joseph Mastrianni each led critical components of the effort to validate, clean, and analyze the survey and administrative data. Key programmers contributing to this effort included Mike Brannan, Adele Costigan, Margaux Evans, Eric Lundquist, Owen Schochet, Mark Timms, and Raúl Torres. Aravind Moorthy also helped validate administrative data related to benefit collection, and he provided substantive input on key study measures of potential benefit availability. Sheena McConnell provided critical feedback that helped shape our development of the main analysis results, and her helpful comments improved the initial draft of this report. We also received excellent production support from Betty Teller, Jane Retter, and Bill Garrett, who edited the report, as well as Colleen Fitts, who assisted with formatting. v This page has been left blank for double-sided copying. ADDITIONAL UC BENEFITS DURING THE GREAT RECESSION MATHEMATICA POLICY RESEARCH CONTENTS ABSTRACT ................................................................................................................................................ xv EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ......................................................................................................................... xvii I. INTRODUCTION .............................................................................................................................. 1 A. Economic and policy context ..................................................................................................... 2 B. The UC policy response ............................................................................................................ 5 C. Study research questions and data used to answer them ........................................................ 8 D. Prior research on extended UC benefits ................................................................................... 9 E. Roadmap for the rest of this report .......................................................................................... 15 II. DATA SOURCES AND STUDY STATES ...................................................................................... 17 A. Data collected for the study ..................................................................................................... 17 B. Description of the study states ................................................................................................ 20 C. Description of the survey respondents .................................................................................... 22 III. PATTERNS OF BENEFIT COLLECTION AND POST-CLAIM EMPLOYMENT ........................... 25 A. Benefit collection ..................................................................................................................... 25 B. Post-claim labor market outcomes .......................................................................................... 28 IV. WHO COLLECTED RECESSIONARY BENEFITS AND HOW DID THEY FARE? ...................... 31 A. Characteristics of recipients before collecting UI .................................................................... 31 B. How UC recipients fared after the initial UI claim .................................................................... 34 C. How recipients fared at the time of the survey (four to six years after their initial UI claims) ..................................................................................................................................... 38 V. HOW WERE POTENTIAL BENEFIT DURATIONS RELATED TO OUTCOMES? ....................... 41 A. Measuring potential UC benefit durations ............................................................................... 41 B. Patterns of potential UC benefit durations for survey respondents ......................................... 46 C. Measuring the association between potential duration and outcomes ................................... 47 D. Potential benefit durations and labor market outcomes .......................................................... 49 E. Potential benefit durations and economic well-being at the time of the survey ...................... 54 VI. HOW MUCH MONETARY SUPPORT DID RECIPIENTS DERIVE FROM THE FAC PROGRAM AND THE ARRA INCOME TAX EXEMPTION? ......................................................... 57 A. Monetary support derived from the FAC program ................................................................... 57 B. Monetary support derived from the ARRA income tax exemption .......................................... 58 vii ADDITIONAL UC BENEFITS DURING THE GREAT RECESSION MATHEMATICA POLICY RESEARCH C. Likely effects of the ARRA UC monetary enhancements on the duration of unemployment ......................................................................................................................... 60 VII. CONCLUSIONS ............................................................................................................................. 61 A. Who collected EUC08/EB benefits and how did they fare? .................................................... 61 B. How was the availability of additional recessionary UC benefits related to recipients’ outcomes? ............................................................................................................................... 63 REFERENCES ............................................................................................................................................ 67 APPENDIX A. STATE SAVINGS FROM THE ARRA WAIVER ON UNEMPLOYMENT TRUST FUND LOAN INTEREST ............................................................................................................................ A.1 APPENDIX B. DEVELOPMENT OF MAIN ANALYSIS DATA FILES .......................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • SEA Fact Sheet
    WHAT IS THE SEA PROGRAM? The Self-Employment Assistance (SEA) program offers qualifying dislocated workers the opportunity for early re-employment through self-employment. The program is designed to encourage and enable unemployed workers to create their own jobs by starting their own small businesses. States operating an SEA program can pay an SEA allowance, instead of regular unemployment insurance benefits, to help unemployed workers while they are establishing businesses and becoming self-employed. Participants receive weekly allowances while they are getting their businesses off the ground. ELIGIBILTY REQUIREMENTS To receive these benefits, an individual must first be eligible to receive regular unemployment insurance under State law. Indiviuals who have been permanently separated from their previous employment and are identified as likely to exhaust regular unemployment benefits are eligible to apply for the program along with other program requirements as designated by the state. Individuals who are found eligible for SEA must engage in full-time self-employment activities in accordance with the state’s SEA program - including entrepreneurial training, business counseling, business plan development, etc. APPLICATION PROCESS SEA is a voluntary state program. To date, there are five SEA states. For more information on each state’s SEA program and requirements, visit the state’s UI agency’s website. } Delaware (Note: See agency “Contact” instructions to obtain SEA program information) } Mississippi } New Hampshire } New York } Oregon ADDITIONAL SEA INFORMATION You can obtain additional SEA information through the Self-Employment Assistance Center. The U.S. Department of Labor, in partnership with the Small Business Administration, created the Self-Employment Assistance Center to provide information, resources, and tools to help build state entrepreneurial programs for individuals eligible for Unemployment Insurance compensation.
    [Show full text]
  • Unemployment Benefits and Unemployment in the Great Recession: the Role of Macro Effects
    NBER WORKING PAPER SERIES UNEMPLOYMENT BENEFITS AND UNEMPLOYMENT IN THE GREAT RECESSION: THE ROLE OF MACRO EFFECTS Marcus Hagedorn Fatih Karahan Iourii Manovskii Kurt Mitman Working Paper 19499 http://www.nber.org/papers/w19499 NATIONAL BUREAU OF ECONOMIC RESEARCH 1050 Massachusetts Avenue Cambridge, MA 02138 October 2013 We would like to thank Bob Hall, Sam Schulhofer-Wohl and seminar participants at Census Bureau, Edinburgh, EIEF, USC, Maryland, Penn State, UPenn, Princeton, Pompeu Fabra, Toulouse, UCL, UConn, Wisconsin, CUNY Graduate Center, Greater Stockholm Macro Group, Federal Reserve Banks of Cleveland, New York, and Philadelphia, 2013 conference on Macroeconomics Across Time and Space, 2013 SED, 2013 NBER Summer Institute (EFCE, EFMB, EFRSW groups), 2013 North American Summer Meeting of Econometric Society, 2013 Minnesota Workshop in Macroeconomic Theory, 15th IZA/CEPR European Summer Symposium on Labor Economics, Mannheim conference on \Financial Frictions and Real Economy," 4th Ifo Conference on "Macroeconomics and Survey Data", 2014 ASSA Meetings, 2014 NBER Public Economics Program Meeting and 2014 Cowles Foundation Summer Conference on \Structural Empirical Microeconomic Models" for their comments. We are especially grateful to June Shelp, at The Conference Board, for her help with the HWOL data. The opinions expressed herein are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York or the Federal Reserve System. Support from the National Science Foundation Grants No. SES-0922406 and SES-1357903 is gratefully acknowledged. The opinions expressed herein are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York, the Federal Reserve System, or the National Bureau of Economic Research.
    [Show full text]
  • Emergency Unemployment Compensation (EUC08): Current Status of Benefits
    Emergency Unemployment Compensation (EUC08): Current Status of Benefits Julie M. Whittaker Specialist in Income Security Katelin P. Isaacs Analyst in Income Security March 28, 2012 The House Ways and Means Committee is making available this version of this Congressional Research Service (CRS) report, with the cover date shown, for inclusion in its 2012 Green Book website. CRS works exclusively for the United States Congress, providing policy and legal analysis to Committees and Members of both the House and Senate, regardless of party affiliation. Congressional Research Service R42444 CRS Report for Congress Prepared for Members and Committees of Congress Emergency Unemployment Compensation (EUC08): Current Status of Benefits Summary The temporary Emergency Unemployment Compensation (EUC08) program may provide additional federal unemployment insurance benefits to eligible individuals who have exhausted all available benefits from their state Unemployment Compensation (UC) programs. Congress created the EUC08 program in 2008 and has amended the original, authorizing law (P.L. 110-252) 10 times. The most recent extension of EUC08 in P.L. 112-96, the Middle Class Tax Relief and Job Creation Act of 2012, authorizes EUC08 benefits through the end of calendar year 2012. P.L. 112- 96 also alters the structure and potential availability of EUC08 benefits in states. Under P.L. 112- 96, the potential duration of EUC08 benefits available to eligible individuals depends on state unemployment rates as well as the calendar date. The P.L. 112-96 extension of the EUC08 program does not allow any individual to receive more than 99 weeks of total unemployment insurance (i.e., total weeks of benefits from the three currently authorized programs: regular UC plus EUC08 plus EB).
    [Show full text]
  • How to Apply for Unemployment Benefits Online Tutorial Content
    How to Apply for Unemployment Benefits Online Tutorial Content This tutorial contains the instructions and web page screenshots you need to complete, submit, and confirm your unemployment benefits application online. You can read this tutorial page by page, or you can skip to one of the two main sections by selecting the link: • Applying for Benefits • Next Steps and Requirements Note: You might want to print pages from this tutorial. If you do not have a printer, you can complete and print your application for free at your local Workforce Solutions office. Applying over the Internet is fast, easy, and secure Most people can apply for benefits and manage their unemployment claims online through Unemployment Benefits Services. However, if you worked in Massachusetts, Wisconsin, or Puerto Rico in the past 18 months, you must call the Texas Workforce Commission (TWC) Tele-Center at 800-939-6631 instead. Here’s what you need to get started . When you apply for benefits, you will need your: • Social Security number • Last employer’s business name, address, and phone number • First and last dates (month, day, and year) you worked for your last employer • Number of hours you worked and your pay rate if you worked during the week you apply (including Sunday) • Military employment (service) start/end dates and a copy of your DD Form 214(s)(member copy 4 through 8), if you served in the military during the past 18 months • Alien Registration number (if not a U.S. citizen or national) Return to Contents 3 Applying for Benefits In this section, you will learn how to: • Fill in your application by entering personal information and last employment details • Review and submit your application • Confirm your claim Return to Contents Important Your information will not be saved if you log off before you submit and receive a confirmation number.
    [Show full text]
  • Phillips Curves and Unemployment Dynamics: a Critique and a Holistic Perspective
    IZA DP No. 2265 Phillips Curves and Unemployment Dynamics: A Critique and a Holistic Perspective Marika Karanassou Hector Sala Dennis J. Snower DISCUSSION PAPER SERIES DISCUSSION PAPER August 2006 Forschungsinstitut zur Zukunft der Arbeit Institute for the Study of Labor Phillips Curves and Unemployment Dynamics: A Critique and a Holistic Perspective Marika Karanassou Queen Mary, University of London and IZA Bonn Hector Sala Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona and IZA Bonn Dennis J. Snower Kiel Institute for World Economics, University of Kiel, CEPR and IZA Bonn Discussion Paper No. 2265 August 2006 IZA P.O. Box 7240 53072 Bonn Germany Phone: +49-228-3894-0 Fax: +49-228-3894-180 Email: [email protected] Any opinions expressed here are those of the author(s) and not those of the institute. Research disseminated by IZA may include views on policy, but the institute itself takes no institutional policy positions. The Institute for the Study of Labor (IZA) in Bonn is a local and virtual international research center and a place of communication between science, politics and business. IZA is an independent nonprofit company supported by Deutsche Post World Net. The center is associated with the University of Bonn and offers a stimulating research environment through its research networks, research support, and visitors and doctoral programs. IZA engages in (i) original and internationally competitive research in all fields of labor economics, (ii) development of policy concepts, and (iii) dissemination of research results and concepts to the interested public. IZA Discussion Papers often represent preliminary work and are circulated to encourage discussion. Citation of such a paper should account for its provisional character.
    [Show full text]
  • Unemployment Insurance: a Guide to Collecting Benefits in the State of Connecticut
    Unemployment Insurance: A Guide to Collecting Benefits in the State of Connecticut DISPONIBLE EN ESPAÑOL Visite su oficina local del Departamento de Trabajo o visite Su oficina local del Departamento de Trabajo You are responsible for understanding your rights and responsibilities outlined in this booklet. Please be sure to read it in its entirety. ¡IMPORTANTE! Usted es responsable de comprender sus derechos y responsabilidades que se describen en este folleto. ¡Asegúrese de leerlo todo! . Visit our Unemployment Website: www.FileCTUI.com 1 | P a g e Table of Contents General Information to the Unemployment Insurance Claimant ........................................................................................... 4 What Is Unemployment Insurance? ................................................................................................................................... 4 Who is Protected by Unemployment Insurance? ............................................................................................................... 4 Your Legal Right to File a Claim ........................................................................................................................................... 4 How Do I Apply for Unemployment Insurance Benefits? ....................................................................................................... 5 Filing an Initial (New) Claim ............................................................................................................................................ 5 Reopening
    [Show full text]
  • ILO/C/168: Employment Promotion and Protection Against
    21 June 1988 Convention C168 - Employment Promotion and Protection against Unemployment Convention, 1988 (No. 168) NORMLEX Information System on International Labour Standards C168 - Employment Promotion and Protection against Unemployment Convention, 1988 (No. 168) Convention concerning Employment Promotion and Protection against Unemployment (Entry into force: 17 Oct 1991) Adoption: Geneva, 75th ILC session (21 Jun 1988) - Status: Up-to-date instrument (Technical Convention). Convention may be denounced: 17 Oct 2021 - 17 Oct 2022 Display in: French - Spanish - Arabic - German - Russian Preamble The General Conference of the International Labour Organisation, Having been convened at Geneva by the Governing Body of the International Labour Office, and having met in its Seventy-fifth Session on 1 June 1988, and Emphasising the importance of work and productive employment in any society not only because of the resources which they create for the community, but also because of the income which they bring to workers, the social role which they confer and the feeling of self-esteem which workers derive from them, and Recalling the existing international standards in the field of employment and unemployment protection (the Unemployment Provision Convention and Recommendation, 1934, the Unemployment (Young Persons) Recommendation, 1935, the Income Security Recommendation, 1944, the Social Security (Minimum Standards) Convention, 1952, the Employment Policy Convention and Recommendation, 1964, the Human Resources Development Convention and Recommendation,
    [Show full text]
  • Comparative Review of Unemployment and Employment Insurance
    Comparative review of unemployment and employment insurance experiences in Asia and worldwide Comparative review of unemployment and employment insurance experiences in Comparative review of unemployment and employment insurance experiences in Asia and worldwide John Carter Michel Bédard Céline Peyron Bista Promoting and Building Unemployment Insurance and Employment Services in ASEAN Regional Office for Asia and the Pacific Comparative review of unemployment and employment insurance experiences in Asia and worldwide Comparative review of unemployment and employment insurance experiences in Asia and worldwide John Carter Michel Bédard Céline Peyron Bista Promoting and Building Unemployment Insurance and Employment Services in ASEAN Regional Office for Asia and the Pacific Copyright © International Labour Organization 2013 First published 2013 Publications of the International Labour Office enjoy copyright under Protocol 2 of the Universal Copyright Convention. Nevertheless, short excerpts from them may be reproduced without authorization, on condition that the source is indicated. For rights of reproduction or translation, application should be made to ILO Publications (Rights and Permissions), International Labour Office, CH-1211 Geneva 22, Switzerland, or by email: pubdroit@ ilo.org. The International Labour Office welcomes such applications. Libraries, institutions and other users registered with reproduction rights organizations may make copies in accordance with the licences issued to them for this purpose. Visit www.ifrro.org to find the reproduction rights organization in your country. Carter, John; Bédard, Michel; Bista, Céline Peyron Comparative review of unemployment and employment insurance experiences in Asia and worldwide / John Carter, Michel Bédard and Céline Peyron Bista ; Promoting and Building Unemployment Insurance and Employment Services in ASEAN, ILO Regional Office for Asia and the Pacific.
    [Show full text]
  • (Faqs) ABOUT the DAVIS-BACON & RELATED ACTS (DBRA
    UENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS (FAQs) ABOUT THE DAVIS-BACON & RELATED ACTS (DBRA UT COMPLETING SDDOT’s STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE AND CERTIFIED PAYROLL FOR 1. Question: Our payroll system is set up on a bi-weekly pay cycle, is that ok? Answer: No. If you are performing work on a covered project (Federal-aid contract in excess of $2,000 OR a Non-Federal-funded SDDOT highway construction or repair contract in the amount of $100,000 or more), the employees will be paid unconditionally and not less often than once a week. There are no exceptions to the requirement for the weekly payment of wages in the Davis-Bacon regulations, codified in 29 CFR Part 3 and Part 5. 29 CFR Part 3 29 CFR Part 5 2. Question: Are we required to submit a Payroll to the SDDOT every week, whether our company performed any Answer: No. Payrolls are required to be submitted for the weeks that work is performed on the site of covered 3. Question: Our company worked on three different SDDOT projects during one week, are separate Certified Payroll Reports required for each project? Answer: In most cases, yes separate weekly Certified Payroll Reports must be submitted to SDDOT for each project work is performed. An exception is when multiple projects are within one SDDOT contract, then separate weekly payroll submissions would not be required for each project within one contract. 4. Question: Are subcontractors required to send their Payrolls to the prime contractors? Answer: It is not mandatory for a subcontractor to submit their payrolls to the prime contractor.
    [Show full text]
  • Workforce Development and Unemployment Insurance Provisions
    ALABAMA ALASKA ARIZONA ARKANSAS CALIFORNIA COLORADO CONNECTICUT DELAWARE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA FLORIDA GEORGIA GUAM HAWAII IDAHO ILLINOIS INDIANA IOWA KANSAS KENTUCKY LOUISIANA Implementation of the MAINE MARYLAND MASSACHUSETTS MICHIGAN MINNE- SOTA MISSISSIPPI MISSOURI MONTANA NEBRASKA NE- American Recovery and Reinvestment Act: VADA NEW HAMPSHIRE NEW JERSEY NEW MEXICO NEW YORK NORTH CAROLINA NORTH DAKOTA OHIO OKLA- HOMA OREGON PENNSYLVANIA PUERTO RICO RHODE ISLAND SOUTH CAROLINA SOUTH DAKOTA TENNESSEE TEXAS UTAH VERMONT VIRGINIA WASHINGTON WEST Workforce Development and VIRGINIA WISCONSIN WYOMING ALABAMA ALASKA ARIZONA ARKANSAS CALIFORNIA COLORADO CON- Unemployment Insurance ProvisionsNECTICUT DELAWARE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA FLORIDA GEORGIA GUAM HAWAII IDAHO ILLINOIS INDIANA IOWA KANSAS KENTUCKY LOUISIANA MAINE MARYLAND MASSACHUSETTS MICHIGAN MINNESOTA MISSISSIPPI MISSOURI MONTANA NEBRASKA NEVADA NEW HAMP- SHIRE NEW JERSEY NEW MEXICO NEW YORK NORTH FINAL REPORT CAROLINA NORTH DAKOTA OHIO OKLAHOMA OREGON PENNSYLVANIA PUERTO RICO RHODE ISLAND SOUTH CAR- OLINA SOUTH DAKOTA TENNESSEE TEXAS UTAH VER- October 2012 MONT VIRGINIA WASHINGTON WEST VIRGINIA WISCON- SIN WYOMING ALABAMA ALASKA ARIZONA ARKANSAS CALIFORNIA COLORADO CONNECTICUT DELAWARE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA FLORIDA GEORGIA GUAM HAWAII IDAHO ILLINOIS INDIANA IOWA KANSAS KEN- TUCKY LOUISIANA MAINE MARYLAND MASSACHUSETTS MICHIGAN MINNESOTA MISSISSIPPI MISSOURI MONTANA NEBRASKA NEVADA NEW HAMPSHIRE NEW JERSEY NEW MEXICO NEW YORK NORTH CAROLINA NORTH DAKOTA OHIO OKLAHOMA OREGON PENNSYLVANIA
    [Show full text]
  • Glossary of Unemployment Insurance Terms
    Glossary of Unemployment Insurance Terms: Able Misconduct Able and Available Misrepresentation Additional Claim Monetary Determination Adjudication Monetary Eligibility Alien Status Monetary Ineligibility Alternate Base Period Non-Monetary Determination Appeal Notice of Claim Filing Appeals Hearing On-Call Approved Training Overpayment Available Paid Vacation Back Pay Part-Time Base Period Pension Benefit Year Personal Time Off Benefit Year Beginning Date Prevailing Wage Benefit Year Ending Date QuickClaim Between Academic School Terms Quit to Seek/Quit to Accept Other Employment Board of Review REA Program Break in Filing Receipt of Benefits Claimant Refusal of Suitable Work Combined Wage Claim Reopened Claim Continued Claim Reporting Requirements Covered Employment Requalification Crimes in Connection with Employment RES Program Deductible Earnings Severance Pay Discharge Sport / Athletic Wages Disqualification Suitable Work Double Dip Temporary Layoff Effective Date Tips Eligibility Requirements Temporary Partial Disability Employer Temporary Total Disability Extended Base Period Unemployed Extended Benefits Unemployment Compensation for Ex-Service Failure to Apply / Refusal Members Former Inmate Unemployment Compensation for Federal Fraud Employees Full-Time Vacation Pay Gross Misconduct Vacation Recess Illness & Disability Voluntary Quit Interstate Claim Wage Protest Intrastate Claim Wages in Lieu of Notice Labor Disputes Work Search Labor Market Worker Profiling Maximum Benefit Amount Able A claimant must be physically and mentally able to work at the time an unemployment claim is filed. Able and Available Available and physically able to seek and accept work as outlined under the Extended Benefits Program. (Extended Benefits only) Additional Claim Restarting a claim for benefits within the benefit year when the person has worked and earned more than their weekly benefit amount for one or more weeks, or stopped filing due to employment.
    [Show full text]
  • What Drives Wage Effects of Unemployment Benefits?
    What Drives Wage Effects of Unemployment Benefits? Evidence from Natural Experiments and Reservation Wage Data Patrick Arni (University of Bristol and IZA) ∗ January 2017 Abstract How should we interpret wage effects of extensions of unemployment insurance (UI) benefits? This paper contributes to the current debate (see AER) about this highly policy relevant issue. Is it mostly through unemployment duration – i.e., human capital depreciation etc. – that UI affects wages, or are reservation wage effects – i.e., higher demands towards a future job match – of key importance as well? The two channels lead to fundamentally different policy conclusions on how (non-)beneficial UI extensions are. This paper is based on a unique combination of register data, which allows for the first time to consider all the three necessary outcomes – reservation earnings, realized earnings and unemployment durations – for the same population and within the same natural experiments. Based on Swiss data, we explore different discontinuities with respect to potential benefit durations (PBD): at the age threshold of 25 as well as a work requirement (contribution duration) threshold for prime aged individuals. The results show significant and relevant reservation wage effects which turn out to be increasing in the age of job seekers. Findings suggest that, per 20 days of extended PBD, reservation earnings increase by about 1%. Effects on realized earnings and non-employment duration provide a picture consistent with these findings. Interestingly, they reveal relevant age differences in the relative importance of the two mentioned channels of wage effects. The decomposition of the latter is further quantified and will also be structurally analyzed.
    [Show full text]