DOCSLIB.ORG

A Cell-Type-Specific Transcriptional Network Required for Estrogen Regulation of Cyclin D1 and Cell Cycle Progression in Breast Cancer

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
A Cell-Type-Specific Transcriptional Network Required for Estrogen Regulation of Cyclin D1 and Cell Cycle Progression in Breast Cancer Downloaded from genesdev.cshlp.org on September 30, 2021 - Published by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press A cell-type-specific transcriptional network required for estrogen regulation of cyclin D1 and cell cycle progression in breast cancer Jérôme Eeckhoute, Jason S. Carroll, Timothy R. Geistlinger, Maria I. Torres-Arzayus, and Myles Brown1 Division of Molecular and Cellular Oncology, Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts 02115, USA Estrogen stimulates the proliferation of the most common type of human breast cancer that expresses estrogen receptor ␣ (ER␣) through the activation of the cyclin D1 (CCND1) oncogene. However, our knowledge of ER␣ transcriptional mechanisms remains limited. Hence, it is still elusive why ER␣ ectopically expressed in ER-negative breast cancer cells (BCC) is functional on ectopic reporter constructs but lacks activity on many endogenous target genes, including CCND1. Here, we show that estradiol (E2) stimulation of CCND1 expression in BCC depends on a novel cell-type-specific enhancer downstream from the CCND1 coding region, which is the primary ER␣ recruitment site in estrogen-responsive cells. The pioneer factor FoxA1 is specifically required for the active chromatin state of this enhancer and as such is crucial for both CCND1 expression and subsequent cell cycle progression. Interestingly, even in BCC, CCND1 levels and proliferation are tightly controlled by E2 through the establishment of a negative feedforward loop involving the induction of NFIC, a putative tumor suppressor capable of directly repressing CCND1 transcription. Taken together, our results reveal an estrogen-regulated combinatorial network including cell-specific cis- and trans-regulators of CCND1 expression where ER␣ collaborates with other transcription factors associated with the ER-positive breast cancer phenotype, including FoxA1 and NFIC. [Keywords: Breast cancer; estrogen receptor; cyclin D1; transcription; enhancer; chromatin] Supplemental material is available at http://www.genesdev.org. Received May 2, 2006; revised version accepted July 26, 2006. Cyclin D1 (CCND1) belongs to the family of D-type cy- mary gland was confirmed by genetically modified clins, which regulate G1–S cell cycle progression (Quelle mouse models where CCND1 overexpression leads to et al. 1993). CCND1 acts through activation of cyclin- the development of mammary carcinoma (Wang et al. dependent kinases (cdks) that phosphorylate and inacti- 1994), while CCND1 ablation results in mice resistant to vate the retinoblastoma protein. However, recent find- cancer induced by several oncogenes (Yu et al. 2001). The ings indicate that CCND1 could also promote cell cycle CCND1-null mice also showed defective postnatal progression through cdk-independent mechanisms, such mammary development revealed by a lack of prolifera- as interaction with and modulation of transcription fac- tion of alveolar epithelial cells in response to the sex tor activities (for reviews, see Ewen and Lamb 2004; Ar- steroid milieu of pregnancy (Fantl et al. 1995; Sicinski et nold and Papanikolaou 2005). CCND1 is a well recog- al. 1995). nized oncogene that is amplified and/or overexpressed in Indeed, CCND1 expression is induced in mammary a substantial proportion of human cancers including epithelial cells by estrogen and progesterone (Sutherland parathyroid adenoma, colon cancer, lymphoma, mela- et al. 1998), which act through transcription factors of noma, prostate cancer, and breast cancer (Ewen and the nuclear receptor superfamily; i.e., the estrogen recep- Lamb 2004). More specifically, CCND1 is one of the tors (ER) ␣ and ␤ and the progesterone receptors (PR) A most commonly overexpressed genes in human breast and B. Over two-thirds of human breast cancers express cancer (up to 50% of breast cancers) (Arnold and Papani- ER␣, which is positively correlated with high CCND1 kolaou 2005). CCND1 oncogenic activity in the mam- expression levels as well as with the expression of a sig- nature set of transcription factors, including FoxA1, GATA3, and XBP-1 (for reviews, see Lacroix and 1Corresponding author. E-MAIL [email protected]; FAX (617) 632-5417. Leclercq 2004; Lacroix et al. 2004; Arnold and Papani- Article is online at http://www.genesdev.org/cgi/doi/10.1101/gad.1446006. kolaou 2005). Amplification of the CCND1 gene is pre- GENES & DEVELOPMENT 20:2513–2526 © 2006 by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press ISSN 0890-9369/06; www.genesdev.org 2513 Downloaded from genesdev.cshlp.org on September 30, 2021 - Published by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press Eeckhoute et al. sent only in a minority of CCND1-overexpressing breast through this enhancer to regulate CCND1 expression in cancers, indicating that pathogenic transcriptional acti- BCC. vation of this gene by factors such as ER␣ could be an important mechanism triggering its overexpression. Results Moreover, it has been shown that artificial induction of Identification of two DNase I-hypersensitive (HS) sites CCND1 mRNA expression in breast cancer cells (BCC) in the vicinity of the CCND1 gene that correspond mimics estrogen effects and is sufficient to drive S-phase to novel transcriptional enhancers entry (Prall et al. 1998) but is also able to reverse the growth-inhibitory effect of antiestrogens (Wilcken et al. Although previous work defining CCND1 gene regula- 1997). Accordingly, another study showed that the major tory regions focused primarily on the proximal 1-kb pro- antiproliferative effect of the antiestrogen tamoxifen moter (cited above and Fukami-Kobayashi and Mitsui could be related to its inhibition of CCND1 expression 1998; Eto 2000), analysis of sequence conservation across (Hodges et al. 2003). CCND1 silencing experiments in BCC further confirmed the correlation between CCND1 expression levels and cellular proliferation, emphasizing CCND1 as a potential therapeutic target for breast can- cer (Arnold and Papanikolaou 2005; Grillo et al. 2006). The mechanisms by which estrogen regulates CCND1 levels in BCC are primarily transcriptional. Transient transfection-based studies have mapped several potential estrogen-responsive sites in the CCND1 proximal pro- moter, including an atypical cyclic AMP response ele- ment (position −57), an AP1 site (position −954), and GC- rich sites (positions −110 and −143) (Altucci et al. 1996; Sabbah et al. 1999; Castro-Rivera et al. 2001; Liu et al. 2002; Park et al. 2005). Stable integration of reporter con- structs in BCC was recently used by Cicatiello et al. (2004) to show that in this context estrogen stimulation required primarily the AP1 site. These authors proposed that ER␣ loading at the CCND1 promoter upon estrogen stimulation was mediated through interaction with AP1, resulting in the assembly of an activator complex re- sponsible for CCND1 transcriptional induction. While these studies suggested the presence of poten- tial cis-regulatory elements involved in CCND1 expres- sion, none explain the cell-type-specific regulation of CCND1 by ER␣ (Planas-Silva et al. 1999). Here, we de- scribe the characterization of a novel estrogen-regulated cell-type-specific enhancer for CCND1 and the combi- natorial transcription factor network that functions Figure 1. Profiling of the DNase I sensitivity of the evolution- arily conserved regions in the vicinity of the CCND1 gene. (A) Schematic representation of the conserved regions at the CCND1 locus from the University of California at Santa Cruz genome browser. The CCND1 gene is shown at the top with blocks representing the exons. The track at the bottom of the gene shows a measure of evolutionary conservation between 17 vertebrate species based on a phylogenetic hidden Markov model. The conserved regions studied in this work upstream (−3000 to 0 bp; red frame) and downstream (d280–d880 bp; green frame) from the CCND1 gene are highlighted. The location of real-time PCR amplicons generated by PCR primer sets used throughout this work is indicated at the bottom part of the panel. (B–F) DNase I sensitivity assays were performed as indi- cated in Materials and Methods with intact nuclei from the indicated cells. The percent (%) of remaining DNA after partial digestion is indicated for every analyzed sequence throughout the CCND1 locus. Results are means ± SE from two indepen- dent experiments. The HS sites are indicated by the arrows at the bottom of the graphs and by the vertical dotted lines. 2514 GENES & DEVELOPMENT Downloaded from genesdev.cshlp.org on September 30, 2021 - Published by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press CCND1 regulation by estrogen species indicated that additional regions ∼2and3kbup- DNAse I sensitive, but the difference in sensitivity with stream of the transcription start site were extremely well the neighboring sites was not as pronounced as in the conserved (Fig. 1A, red frame). Moreover, a potential human cell lines (Fig. 1F). The HS site at −50 bp is lo- ER␣-binding site was found downstream from the cated near the transcription start site, which contains CCND1 gene by an unbiased approach combining chro- known CRE- and Sp1-binding sites that are conserved matin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) and analysis of between human and mouse genomes (Eto 2000). In con- bound DNA by tiled microarrays covering the nonrepeti- trast, the HS sites at −2000 and d500 bp revealed new tive sequences of the whole genome (J.S. Carroll, C.A. potentially important regulatory regions. Meyer, J. Song,
Load more

Recommended publications
  • A Novel NFIX-STAT6 Gene Fusion in Solitary Fibrous Tumor: a Case Report
    International Journal of Molecular Sciences Article A Novel NFIX-STAT6 Gene Fusion in Solitary Fibrous Tumor: A Case Report David S. Moura 1 , Juan Díaz-Martín 1,2,3 , Silvia Bagué 4 , Ruth Orellana-Fernandez 4, Ana Sebio 5, Jose L. Mondaza-Hernandez 6 , Carmen Salguero-Aranda 1,2,3, Federico Rojo 7, Nadia Hindi 6,8,9, Christopher D. M. Fletcher 10,11 and Javier Martin-Broto 6,8,9,* 1 Institute of Biomedicine of Seville (IBiS, CSIC, HUVR, US), 41013 Seville, Spain; [email protected] (D.S.M.); [email protected] (J.D.-M.); [email protected] (C.S.-A.) 2 Pathology Department, Hospital Virgen del Rocío, 41013 Sevilla, Spain 3 Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red del Cáncer (CIBERONC), 28029 Madrid, Spain 4 Pathology Department–CIBERONC, Sant Pau Hospital, 08041 Barcelona, Spain; [email protected] (S.B.); [email protected] (R.O.-F.) 5 Medical Oncology Department, Sant Pau Hospital, 08041 Barcelona, Spain; [email protected] 6 Fundacion Jimenez Diaz University Hospital Health Research Institute (IIS/FJD), 28015 Madrid, Spain; [email protected] (J.L.M.-H.); [email protected] (N.H.) 7 Pathology Department, Fundacion Jimenez Diaz University Hospital, 28040 Madrid, Spain; [email protected] 8 Medical Oncology Department, Fundacion Jimenez Diaz University Hospital, 28040 Madrid, Spain 9 General de Villalba University Hospital, 28400 Madrid, Spain 10 Department of Pathology, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, MA 02215, USA; cfl[email protected] 11 Citation: Moura, D.S.; Department of Pathology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA Díaz-Martín, J.; Bagué, S.; * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +34-95-540-2246 Orellana-Fernandez, R.; Sebio, A.; Mondaza-Hernandez, J.L.; Abstract: Solitary fibrous tumor is a rare subtype of soft-tissue sarcoma with a wide spectrum of Salguero-Aranda, C.; Rojo, F.; histopathological features and clinical behaviors, ranging from mildly to highly aggressive tumors.
    [Show full text]
  • “The Transcription Factor NFIX As a Novel Modulator of Heart Rate.”
    PhD course of Integrated Biomedical Research Cycle XXXI BIO-09 “The transcription factor NFIX as a novel modulator of heart rate.” Sara Landi R11322 Tutor: Prof. Andrea Francesco Barbuti PhD Course Coordinator: Prof. Chiarella Sforza 2017/2018 1 Summary Abstract .................................................................................................. 4 Introduction .......................................................................................... 6 1. The transcription factor NFIX. ........................................................ 6 2. Heart development. ........................................................................ 13 3. The Heart. ...................................................................................... 18 I. The Working Myocardium. ......................................................... 18 II. The Conduction System .............................................................. 18 4. The Cardiac Action Potential. ........................................................ 24 5. HCN Channels. .............................................................................. 27 6. L-type Calcium Channels. .............................................................. 32 Aim ......................................................................................................... 37 Materials and methods ..................................................................... 38 1. Statistical Analysis ......................................................................... 38 2. Mouse model .................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Roles of the NFI/CTF Gene Family in Transcription and Development
    Gene 249 (2000) 31–45 www.elsevier.com/locate/gene Review Roles of the NFI/CTF gene family in transcription and development Richard M. Gronostajski * Department of Cancer Biology, Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic Foundation and Department of Biochemistry, 9500 Euclid Ave., Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH 44195, USA Received 20 December 1999; received in revised form 15 February 2000; accepted 13 March 2000 Received by A.J. van Wijnen Abstract The Nuclear Factor I (NFI) family of site-specific DNA-binding proteins (also known as CTF or CAAT box transcription factor) functions both in viral DNA replication and in the regulation of gene expression. The classes of genes whose expression is modulated by NFI include those that are ubiquitously expressed, as well as those that are hormonally, nutritionally, and developmentally regulated. The NFI family is composed of four members in vertebrates (NFI-A, NFI-B, NFI-C and NFI-X ), and the four NFI genes are expressed in unique, but overlapping, patterns during mouse embryogenesis and in the adult. Transcripts of each NFI gene are diVerentially spliced, yielding as many as nine distinct proteins from a single gene. Products of the four NFI genes diVer in their abilities to either activate or repress transcription, likely through fundamentally diVerent mechanisms. Here, we will review the properties of the NFI genes and proteins and their known functions in gene expression and development. © 2000 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved. Keywords: CAAT box transcription factor; Cancer; CTD; Gene expression; Nuclear Factor I 1. Introduction 2. Discovery of viral and cellular NFI-binding sites The Nuclear Factor I (NFI) family of site-specific After the initial observation that NFI protein isolated DNA-binding proteins plays wide reaching roles in from nuclear extracts of human HeLa cells greatly animal physiology, biochemistry and pathology.
    [Show full text]
  • Integrated Computational Approach to the Analysis of RNA-Seq Data Reveals New Transcriptional Regulators of Psoriasis
    OPEN Experimental & Molecular Medicine (2016) 48, e268; doi:10.1038/emm.2016.97 & 2016 KSBMB. All rights reserved 2092-6413/16 www.nature.com/emm ORIGINAL ARTICLE Integrated computational approach to the analysis of RNA-seq data reveals new transcriptional regulators of psoriasis Alena Zolotarenko1, Evgeny Chekalin1, Alexandre Mesentsev1, Ludmila Kiseleva2, Elena Gribanova2, Rohini Mehta3, Ancha Baranova3,4,5,6, Tatiana V Tatarinova6,7,8, Eleonora S Piruzian1 and Sergey Bruskin1,5 Psoriasis is a common inflammatory skin disease with complex etiology and chronic progression. To provide novel insights into the regulatory molecular mechanisms of the disease, we performed RNA sequencing analysis of 14 pairs of skin samples collected from patients with psoriasis. Subsequent pathway analysis and extraction of the transcriptional regulators governing psoriasis-associated pathways was executed using a combination of the MetaCore Interactome enrichment tool and the cisExpress algorithm, followed by comparison to a set of previously described psoriasis response elements. A comparative approach allowed us to identify 42 core transcriptional regulators of the disease associated with inflammation (NFκB, IRF9, JUN, FOS, SRF), the activity of T cells in psoriatic lesions (STAT6, FOXP3, NFATC2, GATA3, TCF7, RUNX1), the hyper- proliferation and migration of keratinocytes (JUN, FOS, NFIB, TFAP2A, TFAP2C) and lipid metabolism (TFAP2, RARA, VDR). In addition to the core regulators, we identified 38 transcription factors previously not associated with the disease that can clarify the pathogenesis of psoriasis. To illustrate these findings, we analyzed the regulatory role of one of the identified transcription factors (TFs), FOXA1. Using ChIP-seq and RNA-seq data, we concluded that the atypical expression of the FOXA1 TF is an important player in the disease as it inhibits the maturation of naive T cells into the (CD4+FOXA1+CD47+CD69+PD-L1(hi) FOXP3 − ) regulatory T cell subpopulation, therefore contributing to the development of psoriatic skin lesions.
    [Show full text]
  • Regulation of Cytochrome P450 (CYP) Genes by Nuclear Receptors Paavo HONKAKOSKI*1 and Masahiko NEGISHI† *Department of Pharmaceutics, University of Kuopio, P
    Biochem. J. (2000) 347, 321–337 (Printed in Great Britain) 321 REVIEW ARTICLE Regulation of cytochrome P450 (CYP) genes by nuclear receptors Paavo HONKAKOSKI*1 and Masahiko NEGISHI† *Department of Pharmaceutics, University of Kuopio, P. O. Box 1627, FIN-70211 Kuopio, Finland, and †Pharmacogenetics Section, Laboratory of Reproductive and Developmental Toxicology, NIEHS, National Institutes of Health, Research Triangle Park, NC 27709, U.S.A. Members of the nuclear-receptor superfamily mediate crucial homoeostasis. This review summarizes recent findings that in- physiological functions by regulating the synthesis of their target dicate that major classes of CYP genes are selectively regulated genes. Nuclear receptors are usually activated by ligand binding. by certain ligand-activated nuclear receptors, thus creating tightly Cytochrome P450 (CYP) isoforms often catalyse both formation controlled networks. and degradation of these ligands. CYPs also metabolize many exogenous compounds, some of which may act as activators of Key words: endobiotic metabolism, gene expression, gene tran- nuclear receptors and disruptors of endocrine and cellular scription, ligand-activated, xenobiotic metabolism. INTRODUCTION sex-, tissue- and development-specific expression patterns which are controlled by hormones or growth factors [16], suggesting Overview of the cytochrome P450 (CYP) superfamily that these CYPs may have critical roles, not only in elimination CYPs constitute a superfamily of haem-thiolate proteins present of endobiotic signalling molecules, but also in their production in prokaryotes and throughout the eukaryotes. CYPs act as [17]. Data from CYP gene disruptions and natural mutations mono-oxygenases, with functions ranging from the synthesis and support this view (see e.g. [18,19]). degradation of endogenous steroid hormones, vitamins and fatty Other mammalian CYPs have a prominent role in biosynthetic acid derivatives (‘endobiotics’) to the metabolism of foreign pathways.
    [Show full text]
  • Identification of Genomic Targets of Krüppel-Like Factor 9 in Mouse Hippocampal
    Identification of Genomic Targets of Krüppel-like Factor 9 in Mouse Hippocampal Neurons: Evidence for a role in modulating peripheral circadian clocks by Joseph R. Knoedler A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy (Neuroscience) in the University of Michigan 2016 Doctoral Committee: Professor Robert J. Denver, Chair Professor Daniel Goldman Professor Diane Robins Professor Audrey Seasholtz Associate Professor Bing Ye ©Joseph R. Knoedler All Rights Reserved 2016 To my parents, who never once questioned my decision to become the other kind of doctor, And to Lucy, who has pushed me to be a better person from day one. ii Acknowledgements I have a huge number of people to thank for having made it to this point, so in no particular order: -I would like to thank my adviser, Dr. Robert J. Denver, for his guidance, encouragement, and patience over the last seven years; his mentorship has been indispensable for my growth as a scientist -I would also like to thank my committee members, Drs. Audrey Seasholtz, Dan Goldman, Diane Robins and Bing Ye, for their constructive feedback and their willingness to meet in a frequently cold, windowless room across campus from where they work -I am hugely indebted to Pia Bagamasbad and Yasuhiro Kyono for teaching me almost everything I know about molecular biology and bioinformatics, and to Arasakumar Subramani for his tireless work during the home stretch to my dissertation -I am grateful for the Neuroscience Program leadership and staff, in particular
    [Show full text]
  • The Convergent Roles of the Nuclear Factor I Transcription Factors in Development and Cancer
    The convergent roles of the nuclear factor I transcription factors in development and cancer Kok-Siong Chen1, Jonathan W.C. Lim1, Linda J. Richards1,2*, Jens Bunt1* 1 Queensland Brain Institute, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia 4072 2 The School of Biomedical Sciences, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia 4072 * Corresponding authors: Jens Bunt: [email protected] and Linda J Richards: [email protected] 1 Highlights • NFI transcription factors play important roles in normal development and are associated with cancer in multiple organ systems. • NFI transcription factors are implicated in tumours that arise from cells that normally express the concordant transcription factor during development. • The role of NFI transcription factors in regulating the balance between cell proliferation and differentiation during development may be disrupted in cancer. • NFI transcription factors are context-dependent in various cancer types and can play either oncogenic or tumour-suppressive roles. 2 Abstract The nuclear factor I (NFI) transcription factors play important roles during normal development and have been associated with developmental abnormalities in humans. All four family members, NFIA, NFIB, NFIC and NFIX, have a homologous DNA binding domain and function by regulating cell proliferation and differentiation via the transcriptional control of their target genes. More recently, NFI genes have also been implicated in cancer based on genomic analyses and studies of animal models in a variety of tumours across multiple organ systems. However, the association between their functions in development and in cancer is not well described. In this review, we summarise the evidence suggesting a converging role for the NFI genes in development and cancer.
    [Show full text]
  • Autocrine IFN Signaling Inducing Profibrotic Fibroblast Responses By
    Downloaded from http://www.jimmunol.org/ by guest on September 23, 2021 Inducing is online at: average * The Journal of Immunology , 11 of which you can access for free at: 2013; 191:2956-2966; Prepublished online 16 from submission to initial decision 4 weeks from acceptance to publication August 2013; doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1300376 http://www.jimmunol.org/content/191/6/2956 A Synthetic TLR3 Ligand Mitigates Profibrotic Fibroblast Responses by Autocrine IFN Signaling Feng Fang, Kohtaro Ooka, Xiaoyong Sun, Ruchi Shah, Swati Bhattacharyya, Jun Wei and John Varga J Immunol cites 49 articles Submit online. Every submission reviewed by practicing scientists ? is published twice each month by Receive free email-alerts when new articles cite this article. Sign up at: http://jimmunol.org/alerts http://jimmunol.org/subscription Submit copyright permission requests at: http://www.aai.org/About/Publications/JI/copyright.html http://www.jimmunol.org/content/suppl/2013/08/20/jimmunol.130037 6.DC1 This article http://www.jimmunol.org/content/191/6/2956.full#ref-list-1 Information about subscribing to The JI No Triage! Fast Publication! Rapid Reviews! 30 days* Why • • • Material References Permissions Email Alerts Subscription Supplementary The Journal of Immunology The American Association of Immunologists, Inc., 1451 Rockville Pike, Suite 650, Rockville, MD 20852 Copyright © 2013 by The American Association of Immunologists, Inc. All rights reserved. Print ISSN: 0022-1767 Online ISSN: 1550-6606. This information is current as of September 23, 2021. The Journal of Immunology A Synthetic TLR3 Ligand Mitigates Profibrotic Fibroblast Responses by Inducing Autocrine IFN Signaling Feng Fang,* Kohtaro Ooka,* Xiaoyong Sun,† Ruchi Shah,* Swati Bhattacharyya,* Jun Wei,* and John Varga* Activation of TLR3 by exogenous microbial ligands or endogenous injury-associated ligands leads to production of type I IFN.
    [Show full text]
  • Comparative Gene Expression Analysis to Identify Common Factors in Multiple Cancers
    COMPARATIVE GENE EXPRESSION ANALYSIS TO IDENTIFY COMMON FACTORS IN MULTIPLE CANCERS DISSERTATION Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University By Leszek A. Rybaczyk, B.A. ***** The Ohio State University 2008 Dissertation Committee: Professor Kun Huang, Adviser Professor Jeffery Kuret Approved by Professor Randy Nelson Professor Daniel Janies ------------------------------------------- Adviser Integrated Biomedical Science Graduate Program ABSTRACT Most current cancer research is focused on tissue-specific genetic mutations. Familial inheritance (e.g., APC in colon cancer), genetic mutation (e.g., p53), and overexpression of growth receptors (e.g., Her2-neu in breast cancer) can potentially lead to aberrant replication of a cell. Studies of these changes provide tremendous information about tissue-specific effects but are less informative about common changes that occur in multiple tissues. The similarity in the behavior of cancers from different organ systems and species suggests that a pervasive mechanism drives carcinogenesis, regardless of the specific tissue or species. In order to detect this mechanism, I applied three tiers of analysis at different levels: hypothesis testing on individual pathways to identify significant expression changes within each dataset, intersection of results between different datasets to find common themes across experiments, and Pearson correlations between individual genes to identify correlated genes within each dataset. By comparing a variety of cancers from different tissues and species, I was able to separate tissue and species specific effects from cancer specific effects. I found that downregulation of Monoamine Oxidase A is an indicator of this pervasive mechanism and can potentially be used to detect pathways and functions related to the initiation, promotion, and progression of cancer.
    [Show full text]
  • Autocrine IFN Signaling Inducing Profibrotic Fibroblast Responses by a Synthetic TLR3 Ligand Mitigates
    Downloaded from http://www.jimmunol.org/ by guest on September 28, 2021 Inducing is online at: average * The Journal of Immunology published online 16 August 2013 from submission to initial decision 4 weeks from acceptance to publication http://www.jimmunol.org/content/early/2013/08/16/jimmun ol.1300376 A Synthetic TLR3 Ligand Mitigates Profibrotic Fibroblast Responses by Autocrine IFN Signaling Feng Fang, Kohtaro Ooka, Xiaoyong Sun, Ruchi Shah, Swati Bhattacharyya, Jun Wei and John Varga J Immunol Submit online. Every submission reviewed by practicing scientists ? is published twice each month by http://jimmunol.org/subscription Submit copyright permission requests at: http://www.aai.org/About/Publications/JI/copyright.html Receive free email-alerts when new articles cite this article. Sign up at: http://jimmunol.org/alerts http://www.jimmunol.org/content/suppl/2013/08/20/jimmunol.130037 6.DC1 Information about subscribing to The JI No Triage! Fast Publication! Rapid Reviews! 30 days* Why • • • Material Permissions Email Alerts Subscription Supplementary The Journal of Immunology The American Association of Immunologists, Inc., 1451 Rockville Pike, Suite 650, Rockville, MD 20852 Copyright © 2013 by The American Association of Immunologists, Inc. All rights reserved. Print ISSN: 0022-1767 Online ISSN: 1550-6606. This information is current as of September 28, 2021. Published August 16, 2013, doi:10.4049/jimmunol.1300376 The Journal of Immunology A Synthetic TLR3 Ligand Mitigates Profibrotic Fibroblast Responses by Inducing Autocrine IFN Signaling Feng Fang,* Kohtaro Ooka,* Xiaoyong Sun,† Ruchi Shah,* Swati Bhattacharyya,* Jun Wei,* and John Varga* Activation of TLR3 by exogenous microbial ligands or endogenous injury-associated ligands leads to production of type I IFN.
    [Show full text]
  • Molecular Mechanisms of Nuclear Hormone Receptor Transcriptional Synergy and Autoinduction
    MOLECULAR MECHANISMS OF NUCLEAR HORMONE RECEPTOR TRANSCRIPTIONAL SYNERGY AND AUTOINDUCTION by Pia D. Bagamasbad A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy (Molecular, Cellular and Developmental Biology) in the University of Michigan 2012 Doctoral Committee: Professor Robert J. Denver, Chair Professor Kenneth M. Cadigan Professor Cunming Duan Professor Audrey F. Seasholtz ©Pia D. Bagamasbad All rights Reserved 2012 To my father whose last wish was for me to pursue and finish my doctoral degree To my mother for her endless, unconditional love and support, and for teaching me the value of a good education and hardwork ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would like to thank my thesis advisor Dr. Robert J. Denver for his guidance, support and patience, not only in science but also through the personal obstacles that I have encountered through graduate school. He has been an excellent mentor and has greatly influenced my scientific growth and outlook. I thank my committee members, Dr. Kenneth Cadigan, Dr. Cunming Duan and Dr. Audrey Seasholtz for their insight and guidance. Their expertise in the different disciplines of biology was of significant importance in shaping my dissertation research. I thank the MCDB administrative staff, particularly Mary Carr and Kelly Campbell, for consistently helping me out with administrative paper works and concerns. I am grateful for the funding support provided by the Rackham Predoctoral Fellowship and the Edwin H. Edwards Scholarship given by the Department of Molecular, Cellular and Developmental Biology. I am lucky to have worked with people like Chris, Yoshi, Melissa, Joe and Rose who are always willing to help in experiments and have provided an intellectually stimulating and friendly lab environment.
    [Show full text]
  • The Role of the Ubiquitously Expressed Transcription Factor Sp1 in Tissue-Specific Transcriptional Regulation and in Disease
    YALE JOURNAL OF BIOLOGY AND MEDICINE 89 (2016), pp.513-525. RevIeW The Role of the Ubiquitously Expressed Transcription Factor Sp1 in Tissue-specific Transcriptional Regulation and in Disease Leigh O’Connor *, Jane Gilmour, Constanze Bonifer * Institute of Cancer and Genomic Sciences, Institute of Biomedical Research, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, UK Sp1 belongs to the 26 member strong Sp/KLF family of transcription factors. It is a paradigm for a ubiqui - tously expressed transcription factor and is involved in regulating the expression of genes associated with a wide range of cellular processes in mammalian cells. Sp1 can interact with a range of proteins, including other transcription factors, members of the transcription initiation complex and epigenetic regulators, en - abling tight regulation of its target genes. In this review, we discuss the mechanisms involved in Sp1-medi - ated transcriptional regulation, as well as how a ubiquitous transcription factor can be involved in establishing a tissue-specific pattern of gene expression and mechanisms by which its activity may be regu - lated. We also consider the role of Sp1 in human diseases, such as cancer. INTRODUCTION gene for transcription or, in the case of repressors, block - Gene expression needs to be tightly regulated as the ing it. specific pattern of gene activation or repression is deci - Transcription factors interact in a combinatorial sive for establishing fates. The gene expression program fashion to uniquely regulate genes and, in response to dif - of a cell is controlled by the activities and the interac - ferent stimuli, regulate tissue-specific and developmen - tions of the epigenetic regulatory machinery and se - tal stage-specific gene expression.
    [Show full text]