'Macedonian' Dynasty

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

'Macedonian' Dynasty Andreas Schminck The beginnings and origins of the 'Macedonian' dynasty "In the thirtieth year of his age, and inthe hour of intoxication and sleep, Michael the Third was murdered in his chamber by the founder of a new dynasty, whom the emperor had raised to an equality of rank and power." 1 Much more detailed than this statement by Edward Gibbon in his Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire is J.B. Bury's description in his History of the Eastern Roman Empire from the Fall of Eirene to the Accession of Basil the First: Basil struck the blow on Sept. 24, 867. Michael had bidden him and Eudocia to dinner in the Palace of St. Mamas. When Michael had drunk deeply, Basil made an excuse to leave the room, and entering the Imperial bed-chamber tampered with the bolts of the door so that it could not be locked. He then returned to the table, and when the Emperor became drunk as usual, he conducted him to his bed and kissing his hand went out. The Keeper of the Private Wardrobe, who was accustomed to sleep in the Emperor's room, was absent on a commission, and Basiliskianos had been commanded to take his place. Michael sank on his bed in the deep sleep of intoxication ... Basil had engaged the help of eight friends, some of whom had taken part in his first crime, the murder of Bardas. Accompanied by these, Basil opened the door of the bed-chamber, and was confronted by the chamberlain, who opposed his entrance. One of the conspirators . wounded Basiliskianos and hurled him on the floor, while [another], John Chaldos (who had been prominent among the slayers of Bardas) hewed at the sleeping Emperor with his sword, and cut off both his hands ... The conspirators [then] consulted whether their victim should be despatched outright. One of them took it upon himself to return to the bed where Michael was moaning out piteous imprecations against Basil, and ripped up his body. Through the darkness of a stormy night the assassins rowed across the Golden Hom ... [and entered] the Great Palace ... Such is the recorded story of the final act which raised Basil the Macedonian to supreme power.2 But this is not only a crime story but also a sex story or at least a love story. Liutprand of Cremona, who stayed at Constantinople in the tenth century when Basil's grandson Constantine VII was in power, wrote the following: The August Emperor Basil, the present emperor's grandfather, was born of a humble family in Macedonia. Under the compelling yoke of poverty (ttl<; ntroxeicx<;)he came down to Constantinople and was for a I. E. Gibbon, Declineand Fall of the RomanEmpire ch. 48, ed. J.B. Bury(London 1912)V 214-5. 2. Bury,ERE 177-9. Byzantine Macedonia.: Identity Image and History. Edited by John Burke & Roger Scott (Byzantina Australiensia 13, Melbourne 2000). 62 Andreas Schminck time servant to an abbot (11youµEvo~).The then Emperor Michael went one morning to pray in the monastery where Basil was serving and, seeing that he was exceptionally comely, called the abbot and asked him to give him the lad. He then took him off to the palace and made him his chamberlain; and in a little time he became so powerful that everyone called him the second emperor. 1 The young peasant's forma egregia which charmed the young emperor is confirmed by the Greek sources, and especially by the Vita Basilii, Basil's Life written by his grandson Constantine VII Porphyrogennetos: The abbot introduced Basil to the little Theophilos ... who endeavoured to be surrounded by excellent, beautiful (EUEt8Ei~)men of good stature, who distinguished themselves in particular by manliness and strength of body, and to be presumptuous and proud of them; you could see that such men were immediately equipped with silken robes and caught the eye with their other equipment. Theophilos placed the young newcomer Basil among these people, and as he seemed to surpass the others greatly in respect of bodily strength and spiritual manliness, he was appointed protostrator, i.e. first master of the horse, by Theophilos who loved (T]ya.1tfrto)him more and more day after day and worshipped him for his superior qualities.2 Basil's protector Theophilitzes then introduced him to Michael III by telling the emperor that Basil would be able to catch Michael's intractable horse that had run away. Constantine described it as follows: When the emperor ordered that this should be done, Basil executed it willingly and in a shapely manner (Euq>uro~).The emperor wondered about that and began to love (aymt~cm~) his shapeliness (Euq>uia.v) with manliness and his sagacity so that he at once took him away from I. Liutprandof Cremona,Antapodosis ed. J. Bekker(Hannover-Leipzig 1915) 1.8: "Ba~ilius imperatoraugustus, avus huius, Macedoniahumili fuerat prosapiaoriundus, descenditque Constantinopolim tf\i; ntcoxdai;, quod est paupertatis iugo, ut cuidam serviret fiyouµevcp, id est abbati. lgitur imperator Michahel, qui tune temporis erat, cum orationis gratia ad monasterium istud, in quo hie ministrabat, descenderet, vidit hunc forma praeter ceteros egregia, accitumque tov fiyouµevov, abbatem, rogavit, ut se donaret hoc puero; quern suscipiensin palatio,cubicularii donavit officio.Tantae denique post paululumpotestatis est factus,ut alter ab omnibus imperatorsit apellatus." 2 Constantine VII Porphyrogennetos, "Vita Basilii", TheophCont 225.1-12: totltq> (JUVEcrtTJ<JEtov Ba<JtA.ElOVo fiyouµevoi; · EttlYX<XVEyap 7tCO<;to 8£0q>tA.iotov tO\ltO ... di; <J7tOU0TJVfXOV yevvaioui; civopai; 1ml EUElOEt<;1ml EUTJA.llCCl<; 1ml £7t. avop(~ µaA.t<Jta 1ml pcoµn crcoµatoi; Otaq>epovtai; 1C£1Ctf\cr0m7tEpl autov Kat £7tt tOtltOl<; µeya q>pOVEtVKat <JEµVtJVE<J0m· OU<; Eu0ui; ~V opiiv <JTJptlCati; tE Ko<Jµouµevoui; fo0f\crt l((lt tft CXA.A.TIKata<JtoA.ft Om1tpE1tovtai;. toutoti; KataA.qEvta tov VETJA.UVveaviav BacriA.Etov, 1ml Kata itoA.u npo£XEtVo61;avta t&v A.om&v Kata tE crcoµattKTJVaA.lCTJV Kai 'lfUXllCTJVavop(av, itpcotocrtpatopa autO\l 7t£7t0lTJ1CEVO 8EO<j>lA.O<;,Kai fiµepav el; fiµepai; £7t1.7tA.EOV ,;yaniito nap' <XUto\lKai £7t1.to'ii; oiKElOl<; 1tpotEpfiµa<JtV e0auµa~EtO. .
Recommended publications
  • Byzantine Conquests in the East in the 10 Century
    th Byzantine conquests in the East in the 10 century Campaigns of Nikephoros II Phocas and John Tzimiskes as were seen in the Byzantine sources Master thesis Filip Schneider s1006649 15. 6. 2018 Eternal Rome Supervisor: Prof. dr. Maaike van Berkel Master's programme in History Radboud Univerity Front page: Emperor Nikephoros II Phocas entering Constantinople in 963, an illustration from the Madrid Skylitzes. The illuminated manuscript of the work of John Skylitzes was created in the 12th century Sicily. Today it is located in the National Library of Spain in Madrid. Table of contents Introduction 5 Chapter 1 - Byzantine-Arab relations until 963 7 Byzantine-Arab relations in the pre-Islamic era 7 The advance of Islam 8 The Abbasid Caliphate 9 Byzantine Empire under the Macedonian dynasty 10 The development of Byzantine Empire under Macedonian dynasty 11 The land aristocracy 12 The Muslim world in the 9th and 10th century 14 The Hamdamids 15 The Fatimid Caliphate 16 Chapter 2 - Historiography 17 Leo the Deacon 18 Historiography in the Macedonian period 18 Leo the Deacon - biography 19 The History 21 John Skylitzes 24 11th century Byzantium 24 Historiography after Basil II 25 John Skylitzes - biography 26 Synopsis of Histories 27 Chapter 3 - Nikephoros II Phocas 29 Domestikos Nikephoros Phocas and the conquest of Crete 29 Conquest of Aleppo 31 Emperor Nikephoros II Phocas and conquest of Cilicia 33 Conquest of Cyprus 34 Bulgarian question 36 Campaign in Syria 37 Conquest of Antioch 39 Conclusion 40 Chapter 4 - John Tzimiskes 42 Bulgarian problem 42 Campaign in the East 43 A Crusade in the Holy Land? 45 The reasons behind Tzimiskes' eastern campaign 47 Conclusion 49 Conclusion 49 Bibliography 51 Introduction In the 10th century, the Byzantine Empire was ruled by emperors coming from the Macedonian dynasty.
    [Show full text]
  • 9781107404748 Index.Pdf
    Cambridge University Press 978-1-107-40474-8 - John Skylitzes: A Synopsis of Byzantine History, 811–1057 John Wortley Index More information Index Aaron, brother-in-law of Isaac I Komnenos , A n a t o l i a , Aaron, son of John Vladisthlav , A n a t o l i k o n , , , , , , , , , , , , A b e l b a k e s , , , , , , , , , , , A b o u l c h a r e , , , , , , , A b o u z a c h a r , Andrew the Scyth , A b r a m , , , Andrew the stratelates , , A b r a m i t e s , m o n a s t e r y o f t h e , A n d r o n i k o s D o u k a s , , A b u H a f s , , , , A n e m a s , , , A b y d o s , , , , , , , , , , A n i , , , , , , , , , , , A n n a , s i s t e r o f B a s i l I I , x i , x x x i , , , , , A d r i a n , , , , , , , , , , , A d r i a n o p l e , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , A n t h e m i o s , m o n a s t e r y a t , , , , Anthony Kauleas, patriarch , , A e t i o s , Anthony the Stoudite, patriarch , A f r i c a , , , , , , , , , , A n t i g o n u s , d o m e s t i c o f t h e s c h o l a i , , , , , A n t i g o n o s , s o n o f B a r d a s , , A g r o s , m o n a s t e r y , A n z e s , , A i k a t e r i n a d a u g h t e r o f V l a d i s t h l a v , Aplesphares, ruler of Tivion
    [Show full text]
  • The Byzantine State and the Dynatoi
    The Byzantine State and the Dynatoi A struggle for supremacy 867 - 1071 J.J.P. Vrijaldenhoven S0921084 Van Speijkstraat 76-II 2518 GE ’s Gravenhage Tel.: 0628204223 E-mail: [email protected] Master Thesis Europe 1000 - 1800 Prof. Dr. P. Stephenson and Prof. Dr. P.C.M. Hoppenbrouwers History University of Leiden 30-07-2014 CONTENTS GLOSSARY 2 INTRODUCTION 6 CHAPTER 1 THE FIRST STRUGGLE OF THE DYNATOI AND THE STATE 867 – 959 16 STATE 18 Novel (A) of Leo VI 894 – 912 18 Novels (B and C) of Romanos I Lekapenos 922/928 and 934 19 Novels (D, E and G) of Constantine VII Porphyrogenetos 947 - 959 22 CHURCH 24 ARISTOCRACY 27 CONCLUSION 30 CHAPTER 2 LAND OWNERSHIP IN THE PERIOD OF THE WARRIOR EMPERORS 959 - 1025 32 STATE 34 Novel (F) of Romanos II 959 – 963. 34 Novels (H, J, K, L and M) of Nikephoros II Phokas 963 – 969. 34 Novels (N and O) of Basil II 988 – 996 37 CHURCH 42 ARISTOCRACY 45 CONCLUSION 49 CHAPTER 3 THE CHANGING STATE AND THE DYNATOI 1025 – 1071 51 STATE 53 CHURCH 60 ARISTOCRACY 64 Land register of Thebes 65 CONCLUSION 68 CONCLUSION 70 APPENDIX I BYZANTINE EMPERORS 867 - 1081 76 APPENDIX II MAPS 77 BIBLIOGRAPHY 82 1 Glossary Aerikon A judicial fine later changed into a cash payment. Allelengyon Collective responsibility of a tax unit to pay each other’s taxes. Anagraphis / Anagrapheus Fiscal official, or imperial tax assessor, who held a role similar as the epoptes. Their major function was the revision of the tax cadastre. It is implied that they measured land and on imperial order could confiscate lands.
    [Show full text]
  • The Schools from Bardas to Constantine Porphyrogennetos
    ChapterXI The Schoolsfrom Bardas to ConstantinePorphyrogennetos After those great figures of learning, Photios and Arethas, who, paradoxically, have not enlightened us about their own training or the educational institutions of their day, we must come back to these institutions and try other ways of penetrating their secrets. Doubt­ less it is no accident that our evidence, as we shall see, relates particularly to the time of Constantine VII Porphyrogennetos. However, in the process it sheds light indirectly on the preceding half century and, to make our starting-point clear, it is a help if we go back briefly. Let us recall then that Leo the Mathematician, born probably in the last decade of the eighth century, could receive a "secondary" education, that is, in grammar and poetry, in Constantinople, but did not find any teacher there who was capable of taking him further. A self-taught man and a traveller, he returned to the capital to give private lessons for many years, and then, on the initiative of Theoktistos, to give public instruction paid for by the State, in the period prior to his nomination to the metropolitan see of Thessalonica ( 840) • Finally, at a date not known, but close to 855, 1 Bardas set him at the head of the "Philosophy School" which he was founding at the Magnaura with the four chairs of philosophy, grammar, geometry and astronomy. Some thirty years later the career of Constantine the Philosopher showed significant similarities and differences. Born in 827 in Thessalonica, Constantine was not able to obtain any education there beyond that provided by the elementary teacher, the gzea,,,nati.s­ tss.
    [Show full text]
  • Download Download
    y t.EE#Ei: ¥¥Ä " . ÄETÄÄI Füll.im#4IH ÄEEEEEE iii. iii.ifeng.es;ä ' ¥ ÄÄÄiiiti i. EÄEEEÄI# .ie?e:Ee.ie?ai älter iiiäi:t⇐÷ üÄÄ¥Ä.jo#YIE. ÄÄÄÄFÄ1- , PREISER-KAPELLER, JOHANNES The Ties that Do Not Bind Group formation, polarization and conflict within networks of politi- cal elites in the medieval Roman Empire Journal of Historical Network Research 4 (2020) 298-324 Keywords Byzantium; elite network; New Institutional Economics Abstract This chapter aims at the exploration of concepts and methods of network and complexity theory as well as New Institutional Economics (NIE) for the analysis of the emergence of conflicts within ruling elites in pre-modern polities. From the point of view of NIE, Douglass C. North, John Joseph Wallis and Barry R. Weingast have pointed out the general structural weakness of pre-modern formations of power. This assumption will be tested against a comparative analysis of the structural and qualitative properties of elite networks, also in their temporal and spatial dynamics. The modelling of the rela- tional web among elite members will also open a micro-perspective on the evolution and resilience of networks between actors within smaller groups and clusters in situations of conflict. Furthermore, it allows for a quantification of the size of conflicts within elite networks and the analysis of their temporal dynamics. 299 Preiser-Kapeller 1 Introduction* In the year 970 CE, a “Roman”1 army under the command of Bardas Skleros and his brother Constantine near the city of Arkadiupolis in Thrace faced the “Scythians”2 (actually, the Rus), who had conquered Bulgaria and now launched an invasion of the empire.
    [Show full text]
  • BYZANTINE ROYAL ANCESTRY Emperors, 578-1453
    GRANHOLM GENEALOGY BYZANTINE ROYAL ANCESTRY Emperors, 578-1453 1 INTRODUCTION During the first half of the first century Byzantium and specifically Constantinople was the most influentional and riches capital in the world. Great buildings, such as Hagia Sophia were built during these times. Despite the distances, contacts with the Scandinavians took place, in some cases cooperation against common enemies. Vikings traded with them and served in the Emperors’ Court. Sweden’s King Karl XII took refuge there for four years after the defeat in the war against Peter the Great of Russia in Poltava. Our 6th great grandfather, “ Cornelius von Loos” was with him and made drawings of many of the famous buildings in that region. The Byzantine lineages to us are shown starting fr o m different ancestors. There are many royals to whom we have a direct ancestral relationship and others who are distant cousins. These give an interesting picture of the history from those times. Wars took place among others with the Persians, which are also described in the book about our Persian Royal Ancestry. Additional text for many persons is highlighted in the following lists. This story begins with Emperor Tiberius II, (47th great grandfather) born in 520 and ends with the death of Emperor Constantine XI (15th cousin, 17 times removed) in battle in 1453. His death marked the final end of the Roman Empire, which had continued in the East for just under one thousand years after the fall of the Western Roman Empire. No relations to us, the initial Emperor of the Byzantine was Justin I , born a peasant and a swineherd by initial occupation, reigned 518 to 527.
    [Show full text]
  • Warren Treadgold
    WARREN TREADGOLD Department of History Saint Louis University 3800 Lindell Boulevard Saint Louis, MO 63108 office telephone (314) 977-2910 office FAX (314) 977-1603 home telephone (314) 862-2886 email [email protected] EDUCATION Ph.D. in Byzantine Greek, Harvard University, 1977 (dissertation: "The Nature of the Bibliotheca of Photius"; advisers: Ihor Ševčenko and Herbert Bloch) A.B. magna cum laude in Medieval History and Literature, Harvard University, 1970 (senior thesis: "Arianism as a Force in Politics, 429-587," awarded Cumming Prize for best thesis in History and Literature; advisers: Angeliki Laiou and Caroline Bynum) TEACHING AND RESEARCH POSITIONS 1997- : Saint Louis University: National Endowment for the Humanities Professor of Byzantine Studies and Professor of History 1988-97: Florida International University: Professor of History 1991-97, Associate Professor of History 1990-91, Assistant Professor of History 1988-90; Fellow, Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars and Research Fellow, National Endowment for the Humanities 1996-97; Earhart Research Fellow 1992-93; Visiting Fellow, All Souls College, Oxford 1988-89 1983-88: Hillsdale College: Assistant Professor of History; Research Fellow, National Endowment for the Humanities 1987; Visiting Assistant Professor of History and Classics, University of California at Berkeley 1986 1982-83: Free University of Berlin: Alexander von Humboldt Research Fellow 1980-82: Stanford University: Mellon Research Fellow and Visiting Lecturer in History and Classics 1978-80: University of Munich: Alexander von Humboldt Research Fellow 1977-78: University of California at Los Angeles: Visiting Lecturer in Classics BOOKS Studies in Byzantine Cultural History (Florilegium magistrorum historiae archaeologiaeque Antiquitatis et Medii Aevii 19, Editura Academiei Romȃne and Editura Istros, Bucharest and Brăila, 2016), pp.
    [Show full text]
  • How Armenians Made Byzantium
    Armstrong Undergraduate Journal of History Volume 6 Issue 2 Article 2 11-2016 Inside and Outside the Purple: How Armenians Made Byzantium Michael Goodyear University of Chicago Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.georgiasouthern.edu/aujh Part of the History Commons Recommended Citation Goodyear, Michael (2016) "Inside and Outside the Purple: How Armenians Made Byzantium," Armstrong Undergraduate Journal of History: Vol. 6 : Iss. 2 , Article 2. DOI: 10.20429/aujh.2016.060202 Available at: https://digitalcommons.georgiasouthern.edu/aujh/vol6/iss2/2 This article is brought to you for free and open access by the Journals at Digital Commons@Georgia Southern. It has been accepted for inclusion in Armstrong Undergraduate Journal of History by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons@Georgia Southern. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Goodyear: Inside and Outside the Purple: How Armenians Made Byzantium Inside and Outside the Purple: How Armenians Made Byzantium Michael Goodyear University of Chicago (Chicago, Illinois) In the past few decades, there has been an increasing academic and popular focus on ethnic minorities, even turning minority studies into a viable academic field. In this new trend, however, minority studies are primarily focused on the present and recent past. This ignores the importance of historical minorities, especially ones that impacted states to such a degree as the Armenians impacted the Byzantine Empire. In addition to their own national history and culture, ethnic Armenians were also a highly important minority inside the Byzantine Empire.1 During the middle centuries of Byzantium, from 610 to 1071, the Armenian populace served as an important source of manpower, and individuals of Armenian descent rose to the highest dignities in the Byzantine Empire as generals, politicians, patriarchs, intellectuals, and even emperors.
    [Show full text]
  • Michael Featherstone CV 2020
    Michael Featherstone - Curriculum Vitae Present positions - Chargé de recherche, CNRS / EHESS (CESOR, UMR 8216), Paris - Privatdozent, University of Fribourg (CH) - Associate Member, History / Departmental Staff, Classics, Oxford Field of research Byzantine Studies Degrees - A.B.(Classics) / Ph.D. (Byzantine Greek), Harvard University - Dr habil. (venia legendi) (Byzantine Studies), University of Fribourg (CH) Current research projects -Edition of Book 'VI' of the chronicle Theophanes Continuatus (10th c.) for the Series Berolinensis of the Corpus Fontium Historiae Byzantinae, in collaboration with Juan Signes Codoñer (Madrid). -Decipherment and edition of the palimpsest fragments of Vatopedi (Athos) and Istanbul of the De Cerimoniis (10th c.), in collaboration with Jana Gruskova (Bratislava) and O. Kresten (Vienna) under the project ’Vienna Palimpsests’ of the Austrian Science Fund (FWF) : https://www.oeaw.ac.at/en/byzantine-research/language-text-and-script/book-culture- palaeography-and-palimpsests/greek-palimpsests/project-fwf-p-24523/ -Edition of the Chronographia Brevis of the patriarch Nicephorus of Constantinople (9th c.), for the Series Berolinensis of the Corpus Fontium Historiae Byzantinae, in collaboration with Juan Signes (Madrid). Publications Books -The Life of Paisij Velyckovskyj [Harvard Library of Early Ukrainian Literature 4], Cambridge [Mass.] 1989 - with A.-E. N. Tachiaos. -Nicephorus Patriarcha. Refutatio et Eversio Definitionis Synodalis anni 815 [Corpus Christianorum, Series Graeca 33], Leuven/Turnhout 1997. -Theodore Metochites's Poems 'To Himself' [Byzantina Vindobonensia 23], Vienna 2000. -Chronographiae quae Theophanis Continuati nomine fertur Libri I-IV recensuerunt anglice verterunt indicibus instruxerunt J. M. Featherstone et J. Signes- Codoner nuper repertis schedis Caroli de Boor adiuvantibus, [Corpus Fontium Historiae Byzantinae XLII/1], Berlin 2015.
    [Show full text]
  • Anna Comnena the Alexiad
    Anna Comnena The Alexiad translated by Elizabeth A. S. Dawes In parentheses Publications Byzantine Series Cambridge, Ontario 2000 PREFACE I. Time in its irresistible and ceaseless flow carries along on its flood all created things, and drowns them in the depths of obscurity, no matter if they be quite unworthy of mention, or most noteworthy and important, and thus, as the tragedian says, Òhe brings from the darkness all things to the birth, and all things born envelops in the night.Ó But the tale of history forms a very strong bulwark against the stream of time, and to some extent checks its irresistible flow, and, of all things done in it, as many as history has taken over, it secures and binds together, and does not allow them to slip away into the abyss of oblivion. Now, I recognized this fact. I, Anna, the daughter of two royal personages, Alexius and Irene, born and bred in the purple. I was not ignorant of letters, for I carried my study of Greek to the highest pitch, and was also not unpractised in rhetoric; I perused the works of Aristotle and the dialogues of Plato carefully, and enriched my mind by the ÒquaternionÓ of learning. (I must let this out and it is not bragging to state what nature and my zeal for learning have given me, and the gifts which God apportioned to me at birth and time has contributed). However, to resumeÑI intend in this writing of mine to recount the deeds done by my father for they should certainly not be lost in silence, or swept away, as it were, on the current of time into the sea of forgetfulness, and I shall recount not only his achievements as Emperor, but also the services he rendered to various Emperors before he himself received the sceptre.
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction to Thethree Chronicles:Theophanes
    Introduction to the Three Chronicles: Theophanes Continuatus, Symeon the Logothete, and Pseudo-Symeon Theophanes Continuatus Book 6 Our first chronicle text is the anonymous history known asTheophanes Contin- uatus, a continuation in six books of the Chronicle of Theophanes the Confessor (d. ca. 818), the primary source for Byzantine, Arab and Latin speaking worlds in the 7th and 8th centuries, which breaks off in the year 813. The second part of Book 6 covers the sole reign of Constantine VII Porphyrogennetos (944–959) and extends into the reign of Romanos II up to the capture of Crete in March 961 by the future emperor Nikephoros II Phokas before the manuscript breaks off abruptly.1 In contrast to the first part of Book 6, which is anti-Macedonian in tone, the second part is a virtual eulogy of Constantine VII and perhaps a veiled critique of Romanos II.2 Constantine VII’s first appointee on his accession was Bardas Phokas as domestikos of the scholai, and the military careers of Bardas and his sons, Nikephoros and Leo Phokas, receive considerable attention. Included, for example, is a highly laudatory passage on Nikephoros’s restoration of the cour- age of the army upon becoming domestikos and his direct and highly effective personal participation in battle, specifically against Sayf al-Dawla, the Ham- danid ruler of Aleppo, referred to as Chambdan. Also prominent are passages on the effectiveness of the two brothers in fighting on behalf of the Christians, on Romanos II entrusting all military matters to the brothers, on Leo’s success at Andrassos in Cappadocia against Sayf al-Dawla in 960, and on Nikephoros’s intelligence and leadership in the expedition to Crete and assault on Chan- dax.
    [Show full text]
  • Mission and Conversion in the Lives of Constantine-Cyril and Methodius
    MISSION AND CONVERSION IN THE LIVES OF CONSTANTINE-CYRIL AND METHODIUS By MELANIE QUINTOS A THESIS PRESENTED TO THE GRADUATE SCHOOL OF THE UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF ARTS UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA 2010 1 © 2010 Melanie Quintos 2 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I gratefully thank the chair, Dr. Florin Curta, and the members, Drs. Andrea Sterk and Bonnie Effros, of my supervisory committee for their support, advice, encouragement, and mentoring, and the staff at UF libraries for rapid delivery of research materials. I thank my family for their belief in me, which enabled me to bring my study to a happy end, for now. 3 TABLE OF CONTENTS page ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ............................................................................................... 3 ABSTRACT ..................................................................................................................... 6 CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION ...................................................................................................... 9 2 ARGUMENT ........................................................................................................... 11 3 APPROACH ............................................................................................................ 13 4 CONSTANTINE-CYRIL AND THE LIFE ................................................................. 15 5 METHODIUS AND THE LIFE ................................................................................. 17 6 THE KHAZAR MISSION IN THE LIVES OF
    [Show full text]