Producing and Protesting Invisibility in Silver Spring

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Producing and Protesting Invisibility in Silver Spring Rotenstein, David S. “Producing and Protesting Invisibility in Silver Spring, Maryland.” In Demand the Impossible: Essays in History as Activism, edited by Nathan Wuertenberg and William Horne, 89–111. Washington D.C.: Westphalia Press, 2018. PRODUCING AND PROTESTING INVISIBILITY IN SILVER SPRING, MARYLAND David S. Rotenstein Independent Scholar Introduction Silver Spring, Maryland, developed during the early twentieth century as a sundown suburb: an area covering more than ten square miles where ra- cial restrictive deed covenants prevented African Americans from owning or renting homes.1 Located in Montgomery County about 6 miles north of downtown Washington, D.C., Silver Spring did not begin desegregating its businesses until the late 1950s and housing discrimination remained legal there until 1968, when the county’s open housing law went into ef- fect. Despite dramatic changes in Silver Spring’s demographics and poli- tics, the community’s history and historic preservation efforts remain as segregated as its earlier public culture. New residents with no diachronic attachments to the community and a historically white and wealthy power regime complicate local efforts to make history and historic preservation more inclusive. African Americans, the Jim Crow era, and the civil rights actions that helped break down racial barriers in Silver Spring in the 1960s remain invisible in published histories and in the commemorative land- scape. I live in Silver Spring and I make my living in public history. In recent years, my work has focused on suburban gentrification and how people of color are displaced from communities and erased from the historical record.2 In 2011, my family moved from Silver Spring to an Atlanta, Georgia, suburb where African Americans were being displaced by aggressive real estate practices that were converting the city into a new wealthier and whiter sub- urban enclave. As Decatur was emerging as an Atlanta-area destination for new residents and as a hipster-friendly playground for Atlanta’s burgeoning middle class, its history was being rewritten and imagineered to fit the city’s new image—its brand. In the 1980s, when Decatur officials sponsored city- wide historic resource surveys, those products included African American 89 DEMAND THE IMPOSSIBLE historic places and stories about the black experience in Decatur.3 By the first decade of the twenty-first century, newer historic preservation efforts covering the same spaces and time periods omitted African American his- tory and historic sites.4 It is as if Decatur had always been a wealthy white Atlanta suburb. When we returned to Silver Spring in 2014, I found the same erasures in Silver Spring’s official histories. My work at the intersec- tion of history, historic preservation, race, and gentrification began expos- ing how the processes that led to the displacement of residents of color are tied to the production of histories and historic preservation programs that render them invisible by omission. Since the turn of the twenty-first century, Silver Spring has experienced a substantial amount of reinvestment from the public and private sectors resulting in community rebranding efforts and large-scale redevelopment projects. At the same time that capital began flowing back into the com- munity, a historic preservation advocacy organization formed to preserve old buildings and to “create and promote awareness and appreciation of downtown Silver Spring, Maryland’s heritage.”5 Though the organization has been unsuccessful in its preservation of the community’s bricks and mortar, it has become a highly visible presence in Silver Spring through its quixotic and adversarial historic preservation advocacy efforts, the publica- tion of books and articles about Silver Spring’s history, its walking tours in the central business district, and the design and placement of heritage trail signs throughout the downtown.6 Cumulatively, these efforts have pro- duced a nostalgic and racially biased version of Silver Spring’s history that excludes people of color and mutes their experiences in the community.7 These histories have influenced official county planning documents, state- ments by elected and appointed officials about the community’s history, and the general population’s understanding of Silver Spring’s past. During the summer of 2016, I began asking my neighbors, people in the Saturday farmer’s market, and Montgomery County’s elected and appoint- ed officials if they could tell me where to find sites associated with African American and civil rights history in downtown Silver Spring. Scott Whip- ple, the supervisor in the county’s historic preservation office since 2007, could not identify any. Gwen Wright, the county’s planning director and Whipple’s predecessor in the historic preservation office, replied that the only one she could think of was a historical marker recounting an episode involving an enslaved person during the Civil War.8 90 PRODUCING AND PROTESTING INVISIBILITY IN SILVER SPRING, MARYLAND Despite the lack of sites identified in my informal survey, in my research on the black experience in Silver Spring, I was able to identify about 20 stops in the central business district. The locations included sites of op- pression (businesses that discriminated whose buildings are preserved and celebrated as part of Silver Spring’s nostalgic past) and sites of resis- tance. I then began conducting Black History Tours in Silver Spring’s cen- tral business district to help raise awareness of the community’s missing African American history. After one of the tours in June 2017, there was an event in one of Silver Spring’s historical parks where residents shared stories of discrimination and participants could submit comments to Montgomery County agencies undertaking renovations in the park. The event invited people to “protest invisibility and help make Acorn Park more inclusive.” This chapter examines twentieth century history in Silver Spring and how history and historic preservation are produced there. Using documentary research and interviews with residents, county officials, and others done between 2014 and 2017, I explore the intersection of race, history, historic preservation, and the commemorative landscape in a community undergo- ing rapid change. The essay ends with the June 2017 event in Silver Spring’s Acorn Urban Park. It was an experiment combining activism and history in an attempt to reframe how history and historic preservation are produced in Silver Spring. Though unresolved as of this writing, the event may be used as a model for similar grassroots efforts to make community history and commemorative landscapes more inclusive and accurate. A Little Silver Spring History Silver Spring is an unincorporated community that shares a boundary with the District of Columbia. The community’s origin legend is that Francis Preston Blair (1791–1876), a Washington journalist, was riding his horse through the area in 1840 when he discovered a mica-flecked spring. Blair subsequently bought 289 acres and named his new plantation Silver Spring. By the time the Civil War broke out, Blair was one of the largest landhold- ers and enslavers in Montgomery County (twelve slaves in 1860).9 Though Blair became a prominent advisor to President Abraham Lincoln and his son, Montgomery Blair, served as Lincoln’s postmaster-general, the fami- ly quickly abandoned the Republican Party during Reconstruction. They rejoined the Democratic Party and became supporters of a movement to relocate formerly enslaved people to Africa.10 91 DEMAND THE IMPOSSIBLE Figure 1: Location Map showing Silver Spring Maryland and Acorn Urban Park. By the end of the nineteenth century, the Blairs had substantial real es- tate holdings in Montgomery County bordering the District of Colum- bia. During the first quarter of the twentieth century, Edward Brooke Lee (1892–1984), Montgomery Blair’s great-nephew, expanded his family’s real estate investments by buying up and consolidating large farm tracts to develop “restricted” and “exclusive” residential subdivisions. In the 1920s, Lee founded the North Washington Realty Company, which developed most of his properties through the 1940s. In 1925, Lee was one of several real estate entrepreneurs who founded the Silver Spring Chamber of Commerce.11 Two years later, in 1927, they em- barked on a branding and marketing campaign that included display adver- tisements in Washington newspapers touting “Maryland North of Wash- ington” as a prime investment opportunity: “the logical place in which to build for posterity.”12 Maps published in these ads illustrated new and proposed residential subdivisions, proposed parks, major roads leading to downtown Washington, and the area’s two country clubs. Despite Lee’s planning and branding efforts, Silver Spring never became anything more than a collection of geographically contiguous nineteenth century hamlets and twentieth century residential subdivisions. In specu- lating on regional toponymy, contemporary writers have ignored the 1920s 92 PRODUCING AND PROTESTING INVISIBILITY IN SILVER SPRING, MARYLAND efforts to create a sprawling Washington suburb and the 1955 Montgom- ery County legislation that fixed the unincorporated area’s boundaries as a county-regulated “suburban district.”13 Twenty-first century bloggers and journalists have written that the sprawling Silver Spring area is the prod- uct of United States Postal Service ZIP Code assignments.14 However, the area is generally coterminous with the extent
Recommended publications
  • Monthly Women Salute to Enterprising the Business Newspaper of Howard & Anne Arundel Counties and the BWI Business District Q&A Joani Gammill … Women … Page 17 Page 7
    The August 2018 Volume 26, Number 8 Enterprising Monthly Women Salute to Enterprising The Business Newspaper of Howard & Anne Arundel Counties and the BWI Business District Q&A Joani Gammill … Women … Page 17 Page 7 New Developer Chosen for What Next? The Fight to End Howard Circuit Courthouse NextGen Noise By Mark R. Smith, EDITOR-IN-CHIEF The jet noise is loud. And it’s been constant. For about three years. And while the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) has engaged the community about the issues caused by its estimated $36 billion NextGen flight control system — though with no results — the FAA recently disengaged from talks with the locals in late June after the state filed an administrative petition, with Howard County government following suit in mid-July. The separation has resulted in the muting of the D.C. Metroplex BWI Community Roundtable, which the FAA dictated be created to foster that very line of communication. The group will still meet, albeit less frequently. While the controversy caused by the noise has been discussed and debated, roundtable members are wondering what The design of the new Howard County Circuit Courthouse addresses deficiencies that hamper safety and security at the to do after Howard County has requested existing, 175-year-old facility. that the FAA promptly restore flight paths at Baltimore-Washington International By George Berkheimer, SENIOR WRITER legislation. ment process that started in July 2017. Thurgood Marshall Airport (BWI Mar- The plan, submitted by Bethesda-based “Ultimately the proposal from Edgemoor- shall) to their pre-NextGen status and Howard County is one step closer to Edgemoor-Star America Judicial Partners Star was chosen as the best value for the evaluate new routes, as required by federal getting a new Circuit Courthouse follow- (ESJP), includes a 237,000-square-foot, county,” said Howard County Executive statutes.
    [Show full text]
  • Ellsworth Urban Park - Public Testimony Will Be Taken
    MONTGOMERY COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PARKS MARYLAND-NATIONAL CAPITAL PARK & PLANNING COMMISSION MCPB Item # 6 April 24, 2014 MEMORANDUM April 16, 2014 TO: Montgomery County Planning Board VIA: Mary Bradford, Director of Parks Michael F. Riley, Deputy Director, Administration John Nissel, Deputy Director, Operations Dr. John E. Hench, Ph.D., Chief, Park Planning and Stewardship Division (PPSD) Mitra Pedoeem, Chief, Park Development Division (PDD) FROM: Dominic Quattrocchi, Planner Coordinator (PPSD) Brooke Farquhar, Master Planner/Supervisor (PPSD) Patricia McManus, Design Section Supervisor, (PDD) Aaron Feldman, Landscape Architect, (PDD) SUBJECT: Proposed Urban Dog Park at Ellsworth Urban Park - Public testimony will be taken Recommended Action: The Department of Parks seeks approval of the Montgomery County Planning Board for Montgomery County’s first Urban Dog Park to be located in an underutilized portion of Ellsworth Urban Park adjacent to Colesville Road. BACKGROUND M-NCPPC Montgomery County Parks currently has 5 existing dog parks available to the public. None are located inside the Beltway. The 2012 Park Recreation and Open Space (PROS) Plan estimates 12 additional dog parks will be needed in Montgomery County by 2022. Policy The Vision 2030 Strategic Plan, approved by the Board in 2011, recommends addressing the growing demand for dog parks, especially in urban areas. The Board-approved 2012 PROS Plan recommends that dog parks be provided in areas of highest population density. Both Vision 2030 and PROS recommend repurposing of underutilized
    [Show full text]
  • Draft US 29 Mobility & Reliability Study Technical Report July 2020
    Draft US 29 Mobility & Reliability Study Technical Report July 2020 Draft This page intentionally left blank. Draft US 29 Mobility & Reliability Study Technical Report Table of Contents Table of Contents ........................................................................................................................................... i List of Tables ................................................................................................................................................. iii List of Figures ................................................................................................................................................ iii Appendices .................................................................................................................................................. iv Introduction.................................................................................................................................................... 1 Existing Conditions ........................................................................................................................................ 2 Study Area and Study Corridor ................................................................................................................. 2 Land Use ................................................................................................................................................... 2 Population, Jobs, and Income ..................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • MNCPPC FY21-26 CIP Strategy Session 2
    MCPB Agenda Item 5 July 25, 2019 MEMORANDUM Date: July 18, 2019 TO: Montgomery County Planning Board VIA: Michael F. Riley, Director of Parks Miti Figueredo, Deputy Director, Administration John Nissel, Deputy Director, Operations Andrew Frank, Chief, Park Development Division FROM: Carl Morgan, CIP Manager, Park Development Division SUBJECT: Strategy Session #2 for Preparing the FY21-26 Parks Capital Improvements Program Staff Recommendation Approve the overall direction and implementation strategies for the Parks FY21-26 Capital Improvements Program (CIP). Staff will use this guidance to formulate CIP budgetary scenarios for the Planning Board to consider in work sessions in September. Approach and Objectives This is the second of two strategy sessions that the Department will have with the Board for the FY21-26 CIP. The first session on April 4 looked very broadly at the CIP and focused on overall strategy with project evaluation criteria as well as outlined the path to submission of the CIP in November. Since the Board last met, the County Council approved a final version of the FY20 Capital Budget and amended the FY19-24 CIP. For more information about the current CIP and these changes, please refer to page ©1. The overall strategy and evaluation criteria for the FY21-26 CIP are also included for your reference on page ©7. This session, while still looking broadly at the CIP, will • Take a closer look at some of the key components of the CIP, including funding sources and project types, with their accompanying challenges and opportunities
    [Show full text]
  • The Goldfinch Newsletter of the Howard County Bird Club a Chapter of the Maryland Ornithological Society
    November/December 2017 Volume 46, Issue 2 The Goldfinch Newsletter of the Howard County Bird Club A Chapter of the Maryland Ornithological Society CLUB MEETINGS - BY JANE GEUDER Thursday, November 9, 2017 “Owls in Myth and Culture-a Global Perspec- tive,” by David H. Johnson, Director, Global Owl Project. What people Inside this Issue: believe about owls makes a difference in how they protect and conserve them. GLOW is a non-profit consortium of some 450 researchers, museum Club Meetings ....................... 1 curators, students, and volunteers working in 65 countries. This presenta- Summer Bird Records ........... 1 tion will describe the methods, cultural insights, and results of their find- Field Trips ............................ 2 ings. New Member Welcome .......... 5 Club eMail Hacked ................ 5 Thursday, December 14, 2017 “Monarch Butterflies: their Amazing Life Night Flight Calls .................. 6 History and Current Conservation Status,” by Pam Spencer of the Balti- Fall Count Summary ............. 7 more County Master Gardeners. Pam is an emergency room nurse who finds Board Meetings ..................... 8 time to work with butterflies in their several life stages and promote their Eastern Kingbird Photo ...... 10 conservation through educational programs. Meetings are at the Robinson Nature Center, 6692 Cedar Lane, Columbia MD 21044. Hospi- tality at 7:00 p.m. Meeting with program begins at 7:30 p.m. Nature Center doors unlocked at 6:45 p.m. There is no admission charge. For further information call John Harris at 240- Baltimore Oriole at Wilde Lake UMMER IRD ECORDS UNE ULY with three hungry nestlings! S B R : J 1 – J 31, 2017 BY JOANNE SOLEM arely does the short summer season produce the number of highlights that it R did this year.
    [Show full text]
  • The Girls Portion
    The Girls Portion A short history of a 1688 Maryland land patent containing 1,776 acres, a “portion” of which in 1776 would be the first such patent describing land located in Montgomery County; And in particular, the title history to one small lot in Silver Spring, Maryland James J. Demma © April, 2016 [email protected] PREFACE More than thirty years ago I first had the idea to write a treatise on land boundaries in the State of Maryland, at a time when I was both practicing land surveying and attending the University of Maryland School of Law. Working with surveyors was a great opportunity to learn the practices and procedures of land surveying, from using instruments to applying certain mathematical rules to fix the bounds of a tract of land. Being trained as a land surveyor was a good study on how to interpret the language of deeds and easements, and other instruments of title, including land patents, and how one applies the rule of priorities and the common custom of surveyors in order to re-establish a boundary line. However, while practicing land surveying, I was not aware of either the actual cases or statutory laws on the subjects of surveying and boundary law. Although law school provided me with a very solid base for an understanding of real property and estate law, little time was spent on the actual law pertaining to the descriptive elements of a conveyance. After I began my practice of law, I started to teach a course each year sponsored by the Maryland Society of Surveyors, for people who had surveying related jobs, including many who aspired to obtain their professional license.
    [Show full text]
  • OFFERING MEMORANDUM Silver Spring Park 8113-7 Fenton Street Silver Spring, MD
    OFFERING MEMORANDUM Silver Spring Park 8113-7 Fenton Street Silver Spring, MD Ken Freeman Vice President [email protected] 301-828-1236 7250 Woodmont Ave, Suite 350 | Bethesda, Maryland 20814 | Phone: 301 828 1200 | www.broadstreetllc.net CONFIDENTIALITY & CONDITIONS This Offering Memorandum (“Memorandum”) is furnished to prospective purchasers solely to facilitate the purchaser’s consideration of 8113-7 Fenton Street, Silver Spring, MD (“Property”). The Memorandum contains proprietary information and was prepared by Broad Street Realty LLC using information compiled from sources we consider to be reliable. By receipt of this Memorandum you agree that: (a) the Memorandum and its contents are of a confidential nature and that you will hold and treat it in strictest confidence in full compliance with the separate confidentiality agreement you have executed; (b) you will not reproduce, transmit, disseminate the information contained in the Memorandum through any means, or disclose this Memorandum or any of its contents to any other entity without the prior written authorization of Broad Street Realty LLC nor will you use this Memorandum or any of its contents in any fashion or manner detrimental to the interests of Broad Street Realty LLC or the seller; and (c) upon request you will return the Memorandum without retaining any copy or extract of any portion thereof. This Memorandum does not purport to be all-inclusive or to contain all the information which prospective purchasers may desire and is a summary upon which prospective purchasers are not entitled to rely. Certain documents and materials are described herein in summary form. The summaries are not complete descriptions of the documents and materials.
    [Show full text]
  • Mapping Outdoor Recreation and Publicly Accessible Lands in Southern Wisconsin
    This Land is Your Land: Mapping Outdoor Recreation and Publicly Accessible Lands in Southern Wisconsin By: Megan Howell, Katie Kowalsky, Calla Little, Clare Trainor Abstract This project attempts to create an interactive web map of nature based recreational activities and publicly accessible lands in Southeastern and South­Central Wisconsin. Due to the lack of accessible information, we felt there was a need to build an interface that synthesized data from multiple sources, with the goal of informing the public about the types of publicly accessible lands and the variety of recreational opportunities in the study area. This map leverages open source mapping software such as jQuery, Leaflet, Bootstrap and Mapbox tiles in its creation. While we created a successful web map, our struggles with collecting and formatting geographic data reflect the poor quality currently available to the public. The process of this project shows the potential for future mapping endeavours of other public services in the state of Wisconsin. Introduction In Wisconsin, we are fortunate enough to have a plethora of publicly accessible lands, including many outdoor recreation areas. However, this information is not easily found in one place, and is instead spread out across multiple websites with varying degrees of availability and accuracy. For the public it is often difficult to locate these accessible lands as well as determine which outdoor recreational activities are allowable on these properties. Due to this issue, the general population is not well informed about what types of public lands exist in our state, where they are, and what recreational activities are available on these lands.
    [Show full text]