Introduction

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Introduction A- INTRODUCTION. The Manuscripts.—The Accounts printed in the present volume are preserved among the rich stores of the records of the Duchy of Lancaster, now in the Public Record Office, where they form part of the " Ministers' Accounts" of the Duchy, and are known as of Class xxvnr, 1st bundle, Nos. 6 and 7. No. 6 is a folio (12 in. long by8| wide) of eight quires of parchment, containing sixty leaves (a few only are blank), written in a regular neat official hand, ruled and bracketed, with titles and some marginal notes written large, according to the mariner of early accounts. The old soft leather cover, into which the quires were stitched, remains; the two writs (pp. 1, 2) authorising the special Treasurer and the audit of his accounts being attached by their ends to the edge of one side, while the outside is inscribed with the title of the book, the inscription being on a piece of parchment stitched on to the leather. The book has seen much use, and the cover is coming to pieces, but the in- terior is in good condition. This contains the receipts and expen- diture of Henry, Earl of Derby, eldest son of John of Gaunt (Duke of Aquitaine and Lancaster), over his journeys and his household abroad from the 6th May, 1390, to April 30, 1391, about nine years before he became king.. No. 7, containing forty-four leaves of rather larger size (15| in. long by 11-J- in. wide), is also in its original parchment cover, having likewise two documents (see pp. 147, 148) attached to one side; the form of the account for the most part resembles that of No. 6, and the cursive handwriting is generally clear, but it contains some evident errors, showing that the clerk employed by the treasurer on the second occasion was Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. IP address: 170.106.33.14, on 01 Oct 2021 at 08:52:34, subject to the Cambridge Core terms of use, available at https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms. https://doi.org/10.1017/S2042170200002485 X INTRODUCTION. more careless, or perhaps had greater difficulties to contend with among his vouchers and originals than the clerk of the first account (they do not appear to have been written by the same, the hands differ). No. 7 contains Henry's receipts and expenditure over his journeys and household'abroad for the year 16 July, 1392, to 16 July, 1393, In both cases a few weeks of life in England are included, but on the whole they are records of nearly two years of foreign travel and sojourn. Both manuscripts are well preserved and in good con- dition as far as the interior is concerned ; they are, there is no doubt, the official accounts presented by Derby's Treasurer, Richard Kyngston, before the auditors of the Council of the Duchy, and passed by them, to be laid up in the private archives of the Duchy along with other accounts of the like nature." [The books were evidently made up after the return of the earl from a number of memoranda and jottings on slips or small rolls of parchment and paper set down by those concerned in the receipt and issue of the money as their bills of account.b These were arranged by the treasurer and copied out under the heads] which are given in the table of contents, [the monies accounted for on each page being invariably summed up at the bottom of the page]. If the scribe were not extremely careful inaccuracies would be sure to arise in small matters, and this is indeed found to be the case, especially with regard to dates and the names of unfamiliar places ; occasionally also with prices and sums of money. The figures, as usual at the period, are written according to Roman numeration, and in trying to rectify them this must be taken into consideration. Both books with their numerous items of constant recurrence are written in close contractions, a fact which has occasioned doubt in some words of obscurity or unknown gender. For the present * For the purpose of illustrating this work, and of resolving doubtful or explain- ing obscure words, I haye had frequent recourse to other accounts of Henry, or of his father, still in the same collection. These are referred to by the abbreviations D. of L., cl., bdle., for Duchy of Lancaster, class, bundle. b See after, p. xc. Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. IP address: 170.106.33.14, on 01 Oct 2021 at 08:52:34, subject to the Cambridge Core terms of use, available at https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms. https://doi.org/10.1017/S2042170200002485 INTRODUCTION. XI volume it was determined to print the text extended, as more generally readable, and for greater certainty the • extensions are indicated in italic type till near the end of Part I., except in a few doubtful cases where the contraction is retained.11 The old spelling has been carefully adhered to, but the promiscuous use of capital initials is reduced to modern us-age, and punctuation introduced. The total sum of each original page has been usually set in the margin to allow the full page more clearly to appear, every small original annotation being carefully inserted as helping to under- stand the document. Two only of this class are not constantly printed, the sign pr. = probatur, occurring at the bottom of each page, after the total (see pp. 9, 113) ; the other, being the invariable repetition of the sum total written very small at the edge of the lower margin, was of course unnecessary ; but both deserve mention as connected with the system of checking the accounts. Both books have been collated throughout on the MS. twice, besides frequent reference again to correct doubtful points. The Teutonic Order and its relati'ms to England.— The Order of Teutonic knights had its origin in a hospital founded by citizens of Bremen and Lubeck at Jerusalem in 1128. On the capture of Jerusalem by the Saracens in 1187 the hospital disappeared, to be revived at Acre in 1190 under a new military monastic brotherhood, following the Augustinian rule, with vows to tend sick pilgrims and fight the pagans. Henry Walpot was the first grand master, 1190. Attaining power and influence in 1230 they undertook a crusade against the heathen Prussians, and in 1237 absorbed the u Brothers of the sword," who possessed Courland, Semgallen, and Livonia, On the fall of Acre in 1291 they removed their chief seat to Venice, and finally, in 1309, established it at Marienburg on the Vistula, being then also a The italic indications were abandoned at this point on account of the needless further expense, the -contractions being of the same character throughout. Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. IP address: 170.106.33.14, on 01 Oct 2021 at 08:52:34, subject to the Cambridge Core terms of use, available at https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms. https://doi.org/10.1017/S2042170200002485 XU INTRODUCTION. masters of Prussia and Pomerelia. Pomerania was to follow later. The grand master of the Order with the treasurer and the grand commander lived at Marienburg, the marshal at Konigsberg, the grand hospitaller at Elbing, and the trappier at Christburg, the four latter being respectively " commanders" or preceptors of the towns. Other towns had also their commanders, as Ragnit, Insterburg, and many others.a Unlike the Templars and the knights of St. John the Teutonic knights had no property in England, but almost from the beginning of their entry into Prussia the English kings granted them an annual subsidy (40 marks or 80 gold nobles) in lieu of land, which was continued nearly two hundred years, not without some breaks. Henry III., after having granted, presently annulled the grant ; but it was restored by Edward I., who twice confirmed it. Under Edward III. the payment, which then seems to have been due at the house of the Order at. Coblentz, having lapsed, during three years, Grand Master Kniporode wrote to thit king reminding him of the subsidy and its arrears, whereupon Edward issued a charter reciting previous grants and assuring the money in future. In it he acknowledges the hospitality which the masters and brethren of the order had shown " nostratibus per dictum hospitale transeuntibus sepius gratanter et benevole," but does not particularize Coblentz.b During the fourteenth century, but especially in the second half, V • For descriptions of the officers of the Order and their functions, with chrono- logical lists of names, see Voigt's " Namen-Codex der Deutschen Ordens beamten," Konigsberg, 1843. b Six documents making and confirming this annual grant are printed from the Charter, Liberate, and Patent Rolls (English Record Office) in " Archives de l'Orient Latin," vol. i., pp. 416-422. They are of the dates Henry III., 1235 ; Edward I., 1279 and 1286 ; Edward III., 1359 ; Richard II., 1389 ; and Henry IV., 1401. The letter from Kniperode is printed from the archives of Konigsberg, by J. Voigfc, " Codex Diplomaticus Prussicus," Konigsberg, 1848, vol. iii., p. 117, who also give.) Edward III.'s charter (under date 1360). M. Perlbach (Alt-preussische " Monatsschrift, xviii., 1880, p. 226) gives notes from the Liberate Rolls of the pay- ment orders made in thirteen years of Henry III., viz., from 1239 to 1261. Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. IP address: 170.106.33.14, on 01 Oct 2021 at 08:52:34, subject to the Cambridge Core terms of use, available at https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms.
Recommended publications
  • Stratford's the Merchant of Venice and Alabama Shakespeare Festival's the Winter's Tale
    Vol. XVI THE • VPSTART • CR.OW Editor James Andreas Clemson University Founding Editor William Bennett The University of Tennessee at Martin Associate Editors Michael Cohen Murray State University Herbert Coursen Bowdoin College Charles Frey The University of Washington Marjorie Garber Harvard University Walter Haden The University of Tennessee at Martin Chris Hassel Vanderbilt University Maurice Hunt Baylor University Richard Levin The University of California, Davis John McDaniel Middle Tennessee State University Peter Pauls The University of Winnipeg Jeanne Roberts American University Production Editors Tharon Howard, Suzie Medders, and Deborah Staed Clemson University Editorial Assistants Martha Andreas, Kelly Barnes, Kati Beck, Dennis Hasty, Victoria Hoeglund, Charlotte Holt, Judy Payne, and Pearl Parker Copyright 1996 Clemson University All Rights Reserved Clemson University Digital Press Digital Facsimile Vol. XVI About anyone so great as Shakespeare, it is probable that we can never be right, it is better that we should from time to time change our way of being wrong. - T. S. Eliot What we have to do is to be forever curiously testing new opinions and courting new impressions. -Walter Pater The problems (of the arts) are always indefinite, the results are always debatable, and the final approval always uncertain. -Paul Valery Essays chosen for publication do not necessarily represent opin­ ions of the editor, associate editors, or schools with which any contributor is associated. The published essays represent a diver­ sity of approaches and opinions which we hope will stimulate interest and further scholarship. Subscription Information Two issues- $14 Institutions and Libraries, same rate as individuals- $14 two issues Submission of Manuscripts Essays submitted for publication should not exceed fifteen to twenty double­ spaced typed pages, including notes.
    [Show full text]
  • Read the Waterton Section Contained in This Book (Pdf)
    The History and Topography of the Isle of Axholme ... Lincolnshire Rev. William Brocklehurst Stonehouse, M.A.,1st January 1839 Overtown Miscellany (overtown.org.uk) WATERTON is mentioned in Doomsday Book, as having a hall and one carucate of land, the property of Fulcheri; and it is also stated that, at the time of making the survey, it was waste. Together with all the wastes in the soke of Croule, it became, [p.446] became soon after the Conquest, the property of the Abbot of Selby; and, between the years 1160 and 1179, when Gilbert was Abbot of that monastery, it was called a vil, and given by him to Reiner, the son of Norman de Normanby, he paying the yearly rent of twelve shillings on the Feast of the Annunciation of the Virgin Mary(1). What equivalent was given for this grant does not appear; nor has any other notice of this Reiner been found. Waterton remained in this family for many generations, and seems to have been, like High Melwood and High Burnham, what Hunter terms, in his History of the Deanery of Doncaster, "a Gentlehomery, having peculiar privileges and jurisdiction." Like these places, however, it is now degraded into a common farm house. The present owner is Sir John Webb. Reiner took the name of Waterton. This family is equal, if not superior, in a long line of ancestry, to most of the commoners of England : for there is strong reason to suppose that they were of Saxon origin. It appears, in the survey made by the Conqueror, in 1086, that one Liyulf held lands in Normanebi, in the North Riding of Yorkshire; that Norman had lands in Newuetone; and amongst the clamores, or claims, noticed in the same survey, it is stated, that Norman de Andreci claimed three oxgangs of land in Normanbi.
    [Show full text]
  • History of the Welles Family in England
    HISTORY OFHE T WELLES F AMILY IN E NGLAND; WITH T HEIR DERIVATION IN THIS COUNTRY FROM GOVERNOR THOMAS WELLES, OF CONNECTICUT. By A LBERT WELLES, PRESIDENT O P THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OP HERALDRY AND GENBALOGICAL REGISTRY OP NEW YORK. (ASSISTED B Y H. H. CLEMENTS, ESQ.) BJHttl)n a account of tljt Wu\\t% JFamtlg fn fHassssacIjusrtta, By H ENRY WINTHROP SARGENT, OP B OSTON. BOSTON: P RESS OF JOHN WILSON AND SON. 1874. II )2 < 7-'/ < INTRODUCTION. ^/^Sn i Chronology, so in Genealogy there are certain landmarks. Thus,n i France, to trace back to Charlemagne is the desideratum ; in England, to the Norman Con quest; and in the New England States, to the Puri tans, or first settlement of the country. The origin of but few nations or individuals can be precisely traced or ascertained. " The lapse of ages is inces santly thickening the veil which is spread over remote objects and events. The light becomes fainter as we proceed, the objects more obscure and uncertain, until Time at length spreads her sable mantle over them, and we behold them no more." Its i stated, among the librarians and officers of historical institutions in the Eastern States, that not two per cent of the inquirers succeed in establishing the connection between their ancestors here and the family abroad. Most of the emigrants 2 I NTROD UCTION. fled f rom religious persecution, and, instead of pro mulgating their derivation or history, rather sup pressed all knowledge of it, so that their descendants had no direct traditions. On this account it be comes almost necessary to give the descendants separately of each of the original emigrants to this country, with a general account of the family abroad, as far as it can be learned from history, without trusting too much to tradition, which however is often the only source of information on these matters.
    [Show full text]
  • Sir Robert WATE Sir John WATERTON Sir Robert
    Clodoreius ? Born: 0320 (app) Flavius AFRANIUS Syagrius Julius AGRICOLA Born: 0345 (app) Born: 0365 (app) Occup: Roman proconsul Occup: Roman praetorian prefect & consul Died: 0430 (app) Ferreolus ? Syagria ? ? Born: 0380 (app) Born: 0380 (app) Born: 0390 (app) Prefect Totantius FERREOLUS Papianilla ? King Sigobert the Lame of the Born: 0405 Born: 0420 (app) FRANKS Occup: Praetorian Prefect of Gaul Occup: Niece of Emperor Avitus Born: 0420 (app) Occup: King of the Franks, murdered by his son Died: 0509 (app) Senator Tonantius FERREOLUS Industria ? King Chlodoric the Parricide of Born: 0440 Born: 0450 (app) the FRANKS Occup: Roman Senator of Narbonne Born: 0450 (app) Died: 0517 Occup: King of the Franks Died: 0509 Senator Ferreolus of Saint Dode of REIMS Lothar ? NARBONNE Born: 0485 (app) Born: 0510 (app) Born: 0470 Occup: Abbess of Saint Pierre de Occup: Senator of Narbonne Reims & Saint Marr: 0503 (app) Senator Ansbertus ? Blithilde ? Born: 0520 (app) Born: 0540 (app) Occup: Gallo-Roman Senator Baudegisel II of ACQUITAINE Oda ? Arnaold of METZ Oda ? Carloman ? Arnaold of METZ Oda ? Saint Arnulf of METZ Saint Doda of METZ Born: 0550 (app) Born: 0560 (app) Born: 0560 (app) Born: 0570 (app) Born: 0550 (app) Born: 0560 (app) Born: 0570 (app) Born: 0582 (app) Born: 0584 Occup: Palace Mayor & Duke of Occup: Bishop of Metz Occup: Bishop of Metz Occup: Bishop of Metz and Saint Occup: Nun at Treves & Saint Sueve Died: 0611 (app) Died: 0611 (app) Died: 0640 Saint Arnulf of METZ Saint Doda of METZ Pepin I of LANDEN Itta of METZ Clodoule of METZ
    [Show full text]
  • Waterton Family
    Waterton family Arms from the crest of the family of Blachford (see front spreadsheet) and the website about the squire Charles Waterton of Walton http://www.jss.org.uk/cw/Charles_Waterton/index.htm Eleanor Waterton m 16/3/1623 Fordingbridge, Hampshire Richard Blachford m 17/7/1636 Newport, Isle of Wight Thomas Cesar b c 1605 Newport, Isle of Wight (1st) b 1601 Ashmore (2nd) b d aft 1648 d 10/11/1635 St Mary Woolnoth, London d aft 1636 I Robert Waterton m 2/11/1602 Northwood, Jayne Molyns b 9/3/1565 Newport, Isle of Wight Isle of Wight b bf 1584 d 21/7/1648 Newport, Isle of Wight d 6/10/1622 Newport, Isle of Wight I Francis Waterton m 22/1/1564 Haven Street, Ryde Christian (Krystyan) Markes m bf 1602 Elizabeth Newman b 1536-40 Walton, Yorkshire * Isle of Wight (1st) b c 1549 Isle of Wight (2nd) b c 1549 d 19/9/1602 Newport, Isle of Wight d c 1570 d 1639 Isle of Wight I Sir Thomas Waterton m 1532 Yorkshire (1st) Joan Tempest m (2nd) Agnes Cheyney b 1500 Tong Hall, Bracewell, Yorkshire b bf 1510 b d 25/7/1558 d d I Sir Robert Waterton m c 1500 Muriel Leeke b 1478 Walton Hall, Yorkshire b Sutton, Derbyshire d 26/2/1541 d I Sir John Waterton m bf 1478 Agnes Fairfax b bf 1460 b Steeton d 3/1/1495 d I Sir Robert Waterton m bf 1460 Elizabeth Savile b bf 1442 b Hullingedge d 1482 d 3/1/1493/94 I Richard Waterton m 1435 Constance Assenhull b 1405 b 1405 Walton, Pontefract, Yorkshire d 1479 d I John De Waterton m bf 1399 Katherine De Burgh b 1375 Methley, Yorkshire b 1377 Burgh, Cambridgeshire d 5/11/1417 d 1411 I Richard De Waterton m Juliana ?
    [Show full text]
  • THE TRAGEDY of KING RICHARD the SECOND by William Shakespeare
    THE TRAGEDY OF KING RICHARD THE SECOND by William Shakespeare DRAMATIS PERSONAE KING RICHARD THE SECOND JOHN OF GAUNT, Duke of Lancaster - uncle to the King EDMUND LANGLEY, Duke of York - uncle to the King HENRY, surnamed BOLINGBROKE, Duke of Hereford, son of John of Gaunt, afterwards King Henry IV DUKE OF AUMERLE, son of the Duke of York THOMAS MOWBRAY, Duke of Norfolk DUKE OF SURREY EARL OF SALISBURY LORD BERKELEY BUSHY - Servant to King Richard BAGOT - Servant to King Richard GREEN - Servant to King Richard EARL OF NORTHUMBERLAND HENRY PERCY, surnamed Hotspur, his son LORD ROSS LORD WILLOUGHBY LORD FITZWATER BISHOP OF CARLISLE ABBOT OF WESTMINSTER LORD MARSHAL SIR PIERCE OF EXTON SIR STEPHEN SCROOP Captain of a band of Welshmen QUEEN TO KING RICHARD DUCHESS OF GLOUCESTER DUCHESS OF YORK Lady attending on the Queen Lords, Heralds, Officers, Soldiers, Gardeners, Keeper, Messenger, Groom, and other Attendants SCENE: Dispersedly in England and Wales. ACT 1 SCENE I. London. A Room in the palace. [Enter KING RICHARD, attended; JOHN OF GAUNT, with other NOBLES.] KING RICHARD. Old John of Gaunt, time-honoured Lancaster, Hast thou, according to thy oath and band, Brought hither Henry Hereford thy bold son, Here to make good the boisterous late appeal, Which then our leisure would not let us hear, Against the Duke of Norfolk, Thomas Mowbray? GAUNT. I have, my liege. KING RICHARD. Tell me, moreover, hast thou sounded him If he appeal the Duke on ancient malice, Or worthily, as a good subject should, On some known ground of treachery in him? GAUNT.
    [Show full text]
  • Waterton, Lincolnshire
    Waterton, Lincolnshire Waterton, Lincolnshire Waterton, Lincolnshire shown within Lincolnshire OS grid reference SE852179 – London 150 mi (240 km) SSE Unitary authority North Lincolnshire Ceremonial county Lincolnshire Region Yorkshire and the Humber Country England Sovereign state United Kingdom Postcode district DN17 Police Humberside Fire Humberside Ambulance East Midlands EU Parliament Yorkshire and the Humber List of places : UK · England · Lincolnshire Waterton is a Deserted Medieval Village on the River Trent near Garthorpe (where any residual population is included) and Luddington in the Isle of Axholme , Lincolnshire , England. History Near Waterton Hall Waterton is mentioned in the Domesday Book which records that, before the Norman Conquest , the manor was held by Fulcric who had one carucate of land with a hall. [1] At the time of the Domesday survey, it was waste. It became the property of the Abbot of Selby and at some point between 1160 and 1179 when Gilbert de Ver was Abbot, it was given by him to Reiner de Normanby , son of Norman de Normanby, for an annual rent of twelve shillings , the payment of which is enacted annually at Luddington at Candlemas .[2][3] Reiner took the name de Waterton. According to the 19th-century historian of the Isle of Axholme Rev Stonehouse: [4] "this family is equal if not superior in a long line of ancestry to most of the commoners of England". Notable members of the family [5] include John de Waterton ( Master of the Horse ), Robert Waterton (guardian of Richard of York, 3rd Duke of York ), Sir Hugh Waterton , Sir Robert and Sir Thomas Waterton ( High Sheriffs of Yorkshire ), Lady Margaret Waterton ( Lady of the Garter ), and Charles Waterton the naturalist.
    [Show full text]
  • 1595 KING RICHARD the SECOND William Shakespeare
    1595 KING RICHARD THE SECOND William Shakespeare Shakespeare, William (1564-1616) - English dramatist and poet widely regarded as the greatest and most influential writer in all of world literature. The richness of Shakespeare’s genius transcends time; his keen observation and psychological insight are, to this day, without rival. King Richard II (1595) - A historical tragedy in which King Richard II orders Henry Bolingbroke out of England. Henry later invades England, arrests Richard, and becomes King Henry IV. Table Of Contents ACT I. 3 ACT II. 16 ACT III. 29 ACT IV. 40 ACT V. 47 DRAMATIS PERSONAE KING RICHARD THE SECOND JOHN OF GAUNT, Duke of Lancaster - uncle to the King EDMUND LANGLEY, Duke of York - uncle to the King HENRY, surnamed BOLINGBROKE, Duke of Hereford, son of John of Gaunt, afterwards King Henry IV DUKE OF AUMERLE, son of the Duke of York THOMAS MOWBRAY, Duke of Norfolk DUKE OF SURREY EARL OF SALISBURY EARL BERKELEY BUSHY - favourites of King Richard BAGOT - “ ” “ ” GREEN - “ ” “ ” EARL OF NORTHUMBERLAND HENRY PERCY, surnamed HOTSPUR, his son LORD Ross LORD WILLOUGHBY LORD FITZWATER BISHOP OF CARLISLE ABBOT OF WESTMINSTER LORD MARSHAL SIR STEPHEN SCROOP SIR PIERCE OF EXTON CAPTAIN of a band of Welshmen TWO GARDENERS QUEEN to King Richard DUCHESS OF YORK DUCHESS OF GLOUCESTER, widow of Thomas of Woodstock, Duke of Gloucester LADY attending on the Queen Lords, Heralds, Officers, Soldiers, Keeper, Messenger, Groom, and other Attendants SCENE: England and Wales ACT I. SCENE I. London. The palace - Enter RICHARD, JOHN OF GAUNT, with other NOBLES and attendants KING RICHARD Old John of Gaunt, time-honoured Lancaster, Hast thou, according to thy oath and band, Brought hither Henry Hereford, thy bold son, Here to make good the boist’rous late appeal, Which then our leisure would not let us hear, Against the Duke of Norfolk, Thomas Mowbray? GAUNT I have, my liege.
    [Show full text]
  • The Complete Works of William Shakespeare in Twenty Volumes
    CORNELL UNIVERSITY LIBRARY GIFT OF THE HART MEMORIAL LIBRARY 3 1924 071 108 488 DATE DUE I Cornell University ij Library The original of this book is in the Cornell University Library. There are no known copyright restrictions in the United States on the use of the text. http://www.archive.org/details/cu31924071108488 THE COMPLETE WORKS OF WILLIAM SHAKESPEARE IN TWENTY VOLUMES KING RICHARD II KING JOHN VOLUME XI The (mnotations at the foot of the page are intended to explain difficult phrases or allusions. Single words, which are no longer in common tise, appear only in the glossary, which is printed in last volume. The numbering of the lines follows that of the Cambridge Edition, the text of which is used in this edition. COPVHIQMT 19&7. BY THE UNIVEfidlTV I'HfcWi THE COMPLETE WORKS OF WILLIAM SHAKESPEARE WITH ANNOTATIONS AND A GENERAL INTRODUCTION BY SIDNEY LEE VOLUME XI KING RICHARD II WITH A SPECIAl INTKODUCTION BY GEOHGE SAINTSBURY AND AN ORIGINAL FRONTISPIECE BY PADI, WOODEOFFE NEW YORK HARPER & BROTHERS PUBLlskERS Copyright, 1907 By The Universitt Press Entered at Stationers' Hall, London AllBights Beseryed 51^ CONTENTS Page Introduction to King Richard II by George Saintsbury ix Text of the Play 1 INTRODUCTION JHE literary interest of this play, separated as it can be according to the wise ordinance of this edi- tion from non-literary considera- tions, may be fairly considered from three points of view, — two of them necessary and proper, the third accidental, after a fashion, but almost appertaining to that class of accident which logicians call inseparable.
    [Show full text]
  • An English Account of an Arrest of a Man in Norfolk in 1405 for Spreading News of Revolt]
    1 C. 49 ‐ Parliament and Council Proceedings. 48/6 [An English account of an arrest of a man in Norfolk in 1405 for spreading news of revolt]. ‘John Payne, esq., and William Plumstead, esq., on the Monday next after Candlemass Day of the 6th year of Henry the king that now is [Monday 21 Sep. 1405], at Walsingham, met with John Kinglsey, and they asked him from whence he came, and he said that he had come out of the north country; and they asked him what things were there. He answered them, and said that there was great debate between the earl of Norfthumberland and the earl of Westmorland, and that they had fought and that the earl of Northumberland had taken the earl of Westmorland, and held him prisoner. On the morowe, the foresaid esquires asked him what tidings out of Wales, and of Owain Glyn Dwr. The said John Kingsley answered them, saying that Glyn Dwr was strong and stronger ... because he saw wages to men that would come to him ... ... The foresaid esquires arrested the foresaid John Kingsley and delivered him to John Skader and Richard Draper, constable of Little Walsingham, for to lead and bring him to the castle of Norwich, there for to tell what the lord King has ordained for his [punishment?]’ [It would be tempting to suggest that John Kingsley had been a tenant or servant of the earl Marshal or Lord Bardolf, and had fled south to their Norfolk estates after the failure of their rising in the north in August 1405.
    [Show full text]
  • Death of Richabd the Second
    HISTORICAL REMARICS . ON THE DEATH OF RICHABD THE SECOND. ITis generally Itnown, that much obscurity hangs over the commorl stories relative to the death of Richard the Second, and that Henry the Fourth was greatly annoyed by reports of the captive king ha- ving escaped to Scotland ;reposts which he, of course, invariably treated as false, and which a11 our modern historians, both of England aid of Scotlancl, have bee11 disposecl to consider fabulous ; some contenting. themselves wit11 a brief notice, that an impostor ap- peared under tlie name of Richard the Second, ancl others passing over the circumstance altogether. In investigating this obscure part of our history, it was lately my fortune to discover some very inte- resting evidence, which irlduceil me to believe that there was much more truth in these reports than I was at first disposed to admit. This led to an exami- nation of the whole proofs relative to Richard's dis- appearance, and alleged death in Englaud, and the 326 HISTORICAL KEhIAIlIiS res~~ltwas, a strong conviction that the king actually did make his escape from Pontefract castle ; that he succeeded in conveying himself to Scotland, where he was discovered, detained, and supported, by Ro- bert the Third and the Duke of Albany ; and that he actually died in that country, long after his repu- ted murder in England. I am well aware that this is @ start&qpproposition, too broadly in the face of long-established opinion to be admitted upon any evidence inferior almost to demonstration. It is quite possible, also, that there may exist in the manuscript treasures of the public libraries of England, or of France, absolute proof that Richard was murdered, or that he died in prison ; and one great object of these observations will be attained, if they have the effect of directing the attention of the learned to the farther investigation of a subject still very obscure.
    [Show full text]
  • The Lincolnshire Gentry and the Wars of the Roses
    The Lincolnshire Gentry and the Wars of the Roses Jonathan S. Mackman D.Phil. Thesis University of York Department of History August 1999 Abstract This thesis is an examination of the impact of the Wars of the Roses upon the people, government and landed structure of a hitherto under-studied shire. It is intended as a bridge between the numerous post-McFarlanite county studies of recent years and the specific issue of the Wars, a conflict generally approached from a central perspective. It begins by examining Lincolnshire's landed society during the later Lancastrian period, stressing the county's political isolation, the sheer size and collective wealth of its population, but also the lack of any dominant political force. It examines the nature of local government, particularly the changing social profile of local officers, and also the issue of local violence. In particular, it highlights the effects of faction and manipulation of justice in an otherwise relatively law-abiding county, and the influence of the shires upon the descent into warfare. The thesis then addresses Lincolnshire's experience of the Wars themselves, particularly stressing the limited participation of the resident population. The Lincolnshire Rebellion of 1470 is described in detail, this shadowy episode being carefully reconstructed in order to gain a fuller understanding of its importance. This is then tied in with a discussion of how the Wars had only a limited effect on Lincolnshire's social and landed structures, yet radically altered its relationship with the Crown. It highlights the tension between the established order and the Yorkist administrative elite, and the way this became embodied in a local power-struggle which, it is argued, led to the Rebellion and ultimately contributed to Edward IV's own deposition.
    [Show full text]