DOCSLIB.ORG

Environmental Protection Agency

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Environmental Protection Agency Thursday, October 17, 2002 Part III Environmental Protection Agency 40 CFR Part 420 Effluent Limitations Guidelines, Pretreatment Standards, and New Source Performance Standards for the Iron and Steel Manufacturing Point Source Category; Final Rule VerDate 0ct<09>2002 17:27 Oct 16, 2002 Jkt 200001 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 4717 Sfmt 4717 E:\FR\FM\17OCR2.SGM 17OCR2 64216 Federal Register / Vol. 67, No. 201 / Thursday, October 17, 2002 / Rules and Regulations ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION semi-wet air pollution control systems; DATES: This regulation shall become AGENCY and to establish technology-based effective November 18, 2002. effluent limitations guidelines and ADDRESSES: The public record for this 40 CFR Part 420 standards for electric arc furnaces rulemaking has been established under [FRL–7206–7] operating semi-wet pollution control docket number W–00–25 II and will be systems. EPA is eliminating rule RIN 2040–AC90 located in the Water Docket, East Tower references to the following obsolete Basement, room #57, 401 M St. SW., operations: beehive cokemaking in the Effluent Limitations Guidelines, Washington, DC 20460 until August 15, cokemaking subcategory, Pretreatment Standards, and New 2002. After August 27, 2002 the public ferromanganese blast furnaces in the Source Performance Standards for the record will be located at EPA West, ironmaking subcategory, and open Iron and Steel Manufacturing Point 1301 Constitution Avenue, NW., Room hearth furnace operations in the Source Category B135, Washington, DC 20460. The steelmaking subcategory. EPA is not record is available for inspection from 9 AGENCY: Environmental Protection revising effluent limitations guidelines a.m. to 4 p.m., Monday through Friday, Agency (EPA). and standards for the remaining excluding legal holidays. For access to ACTION: Final rule. subcategories within this industrial the docket materials before August 15, category: vacuum degassing, continuous call (202) 260–3027 to schedule an SUMMARY: This final rule represents the casting, hot forming, salt bath descaling, appointment. After August 27, call (202) culmination of the Agency’s effort to acid pickling, cold forming, alkaline 566–2426. You may have to pay a revise Clean Water Act (CWA) effluent cleaning and hot coating. Nor is EPA reasonable fee for copying. limitations guidelines and standards for codifying a new subcategorization wastewater discharges from the iron and scheme and associated definitions to FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For steel manufacturing industry. The final support the new subcategorization for technical information concerning regulation revises technology-based this industrial category. today’s final rule, contact Mr. George effluent limitations guidelines and EPA expects compliance with this Jett at (202) 566–1070, or Ms. Yu-ting standards for certain wastewater regulation to reduce the discharge of Guilaran at (202) 566–1072. For discharges associated with metallurgical conventional pollutants by at least economic information contact Mr. cokemaking, sintering, and ironmaking 351,000 pounds per year and toxic and William Anderson at (202) 566–1008. operations; and codifies new effluent non-conventional pollutants by at least SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: limitations guidelines and standards for 1,018,000 pounds per year. EPA Regulated Entities direct reduced ironmaking, briquetting, estimates the annual cost of the rule will and forging. EPA is also revising the be $12.0 million (pre-tax $2001). EPA Entities potentially regulated by this regulations for the steelmaking estimates that the annual benefits of the action include facilities of the following subcategory, to provide an allowance for rule will range from $1.4 million to $7.3 types that discharge pollutants to waters existing basic oxygen furnaces operating million ($2001). of the U.S.: Category Examples of regulated entities Primary SIC and NAICS codes Industry Discharges from facilities engaged in metallurgical cokemaking, sintering, ironmaking, SIC 3312, 3316; NAICS 3311, steelmaking, direct reduced ironmaking, briquetting, and forging. 3312. This table is not intended to be this action to a particular entity (after Compliance Dates exhaustive, but rather provides a guide consulting relevant subsections), for readers regarding entities likely to be consult one of the persons listed for Existing direct dischargers must regulated by this action. Other types of technical information in the preceding comply with limitations based on the entities not listed in the table could also FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT best practicable control technology be regulated. To determine whether section. currently available (BPT), the best your facility is regulated by this action, conventional pollutant control you should carefully examine the Judicial Review technology (BCT), and the best available technology economically achievable applicability criteria listed in § 420.01 In accordance with 40 CFR 23.2, and the applicability criteria in § 420.10 (BAT) as soon as their National today’s rule is promulgated for the Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (metallurgical cokemaking), § 420.40 purposes of judicial review as of 1 pm (steelmaking), and § 420.130 (other (NDPES) permits include such Eastern Daylight Time on October 31, operations) of today’s rule and limitations. Existing indirect dischargers 2002. Under section 509(b)(1) of the applicability criteria in § 420.20 subject to today’s regulations must Clean Water Act (CWA), judicial review (sintering), § 420.30 (ironmaking), comply with the pretreatment standards of today’s effluent limitations guidelines § 420.50 (vacuum degassing), § 420.60 for existing sources no later than (continuous casting), § 420.70 (hot and standards is available in the United October 17, 2005. New direct and forming), § 420.80 (salt bath descaling), States Circuit Court of Appeals by filing indirect discharging sources must § 420.90 (acid pickling), § 420.100 (cold a petition for review within 120 days comply with applicable guidelines and forming), § 420.110 (alkaline cleaning), from the date of promulgation of these standards on the date the new sources and § 420.120 (hot coating) of Title 40 guidelines and standards. Under Section begin discharging. For purposes of new of the Code of Federal Regulations. The 509(b)(2) of the CWA the requirements source performance standards (NSPS) table lists the types of entities that EPA of this regulation may not be challenged and pretreatment standards for new is now aware could potentially be later in civil or criminal proceedings sources (PSNS), a source is a new source regulated by this action. If you still have brought by EPA to enforce these if it commenced construction after questions regarding the applicability of requirements. November 18, 2002. VerDate 0ct<09>2002 17:27 Oct 16, 2002 Jkt 200001 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\17OCR2.SGM 17OCR2 Federal Register / Vol. 67, No. 201 / Thursday, October 17, 2002 / Rules and Regulations 64217 Supporting Documentation is presenting in the public record VIII. The Final Regulation certain information in aggregated form A. Cokemaking Subcategory The final regulations are supported by 1. Best Practicable Control Technology three major documents: or, alternatively, is masking facility identities or employing other strategies. (BPT) 1. ‘‘Development Document for Final 2. Best Conventional Pollutant Control Effluent Limitations Guidelines and This approach assures that the Technology (BCT) Standards for the Iron and Steel information in the public record 3. Best Available Technology Economically Manufacturing Point Source Category’’ explains the basis for today’s final rule Achievable (BAT) (EPA–821–R–02–004), referred to in the without compromising CBI claims. 4. New Source Performance Standards (NSPS) preamble as the Technical Development Organization of This Document 5. Pretreatment Standards for Existing Document (TDD). This TDD presents the I. Legal Authority Sources (PSES) technical information that formed the II. Legislative Background 6. Pretreatment Standards for New Sources basis for EPA’s decisions concerning the A. Clean Water Act (PSNS) final rule. In it, EPA describes, among 1. Best Practicable Control Technology B. Sintering Subcategory other things, the data collection Currently Available (BPT)–Section 1. Best Practicable Control Technology activities, the wastewater treatment 304(b)(1) of the CWA (BPT)/Best Conventional Pollutant technology options considered, the 2. Best Conventional Pollutant Control Control Technology (BCT) Technology (BCT)—Section 304(b)(4) of 2. Best Available Technology Economically pollutants found in the iron and steel Achievable (BAT) manufacturing wastewaters, and the the CWA 3. Best Available Technology Economically 3. New Source Performance Standards estimation of costs to the industry to Achievable (BAT)—Section 304(b)(2) of (NSPS) comply with the final limitations and the CWA 4. Pretreatment Standards for Existing standards. 4. New Source Performance Standards Sources (PSES) 2. ‘‘Economic Analysis of Final (NSPS)—Section 306 of the CWA 5. Pretreatment Standards for New Sources Effluent Limitations Guidelines and 5. Pretreatment Standards for Existing (PSNS) Standards for the Iron and Steel Sources (PSES)—Section 307(b) of the C. Ironmaking Subcategory Manufacturing Point Source Category’’ CWA D. Steelmaking Subcategory E. Vacuum Degassing Subcategory (EPA–821–R–02–006) referred to in this 6. Pretreatment Standards for New Sources (PSNS)—Section 307(c)
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Introduction to the National Pretreatment Program Revised, 2011
    Disclaimer DISCLAIMER The discussion in this document is intended solely as a summary of existing guidance. This document is not a regulation, nor does it substitute for any requirements under the Clean Water Act (CWA) or U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s (EPA’s) regulations. Thus, it does not impose legally binding requirements on EPA, states, municipalities, or the regulated community. The general descriptions provided in this document might not apply to a particular situation based on the circumstances. This document does not confer legal rights or impose legal obligations on any member of the public. Among other things, the document describes existing requirements with respect to industrial dischargers and publicly owned treatment works (POTWs) under the CWA and its implementing regulations at Title 40 of the Code of Federal Regulations, Parts 122, 123, 124, and 403 and chapter I, subchapter N. Although EPA has made every effort to ensure the accuracy of the discussion in this document, a discharger’s obligations are determined, in the case of directly discharging POTWs, by the terms of its National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System permit and EPA’s regulations or, in the case of indirect dischargers, by permits or equivalent control mechanisms issued to POTW industrial users or by regulatory requirements. Nothing in this document changes any statutory or regulatory requirement. If a conflict arises between this document’s content and any permit or regulation, the permit or regulation would be controlling. EPA and local decision makers retain the discretion to adopt approaches on a case- by-case basis that differ from those described in this document where appropriate and authorized by EPA regulations, state law, or local ordinances.
    [Show full text]
  • Guidance Manual for Preventing Interference at POTW's
    Uncted States September 1987 Ewronmental ProtectIon Agency Guidance Manual for Preventing Interference at POTWs UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY WASHINGTON, D.C. 20460 OFFICE OF WATEfl MEMORANDUM SUBJECT: Pretreatment Program Guidance FROM: ;,rne/#?k%!& Director Of)&e of Water Enforcement and Permits (EN-335) TO: Users of the Guidance Manual for Preventing Interference at POTWs This guidance manual was developed by EPA to aid publicly owned treatment works (POTWs) in identifying, tracking, and mitigating interference episodes caused by discharges of nondomestic wastes. Interference is defined in the General Pretreatment Regulations (40 CFR Part 403) in terms of a discharge which, alone or in combination with other discharges, inhibits or disrupts the POTW and causes it to violate its NPDES permit or applicable sludge use or disposal regulations. The legal responsibilities of POTWs and their industrial users for avoiding interference are specified in the General Pretreatment Regulations. The basic regulatory requirements are explained in this manual and technical guidance is provided to help POTW operators detect and determine the sources of interference. This document will be useful to all POTWs that may experience interference problems, not just those that.have been required to establish federally-approved pretreatment programs. Therefore, EPA is distributing it widely. Additional copies of this guidance manual or further information about the national pretreatment program can be obtained by writing to the Permits Division, (EN-3361, US EPA, 401 M St., S.W., Washington, D.C. 20460. EPA is preparing another guidance document thaL deals specifizall:r with t-he development of local limits to prevent interference and pass through.
    [Show full text]
  • NPDES Citizens Guide
    Understanding the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Program and Its Role in Michigan TIP OF THE MITT WATERSHED COUNCIL A Citizen’s Guide to Water Quality Permitting Understanding the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Program and Its Role in Michigan by Ellen J. Kohler The purpose of this document is to promote citizen involvement in water quality permitting. If you would like to reproduce this book or portions of it for reasons consistent with this purpose, please contact the publisher: Tip of the Mitt Watershed Council 426 Bay Street • Petoskey, MI 49770 PH: 231-347-1181 • FX: 231-347-5928 website: www.watershedcouncil.org E-mail address: [email protected] ©2005 Tip of the Mitt Watershed Council Acknowledgements This citizen’s guide is part of a larger, multi-year project funded by the Joyce Foundation and coordinated by the Tip of the Mitt Watershed Council to improve citizen involvement in environmental decision-making in Michigan. We are indebted to the Joyce Foundation’s commitment to environmental protection and their financial support for innovative projects coordinated across the Great Lakes basin. The project in general and the guidebook specifically were conceived by Wil Cwikiel of the Tip of the Mitt Watershed Council. He has put in many hours shaping its purpose and reviewing its content. An invaluable part of this publication was the comments provided by individuals who are experts in various aspects of water quality permitting in Michigan. While their comments improved the text of this document, it is important to note that they do not necessarily endorse every aspect of the document.
    [Show full text]
  • Permit No. ARG640000 Page 1 of Fact Sheet
    Permit No. ARG640000 Page 1 of Fact Sheet FINAL FACT SHEET FOR RENEWAL GENERAL PERMIT FOR WASTEWATER DISCHARGE FROM WATER TREATMENT PLANTS 1. Background The existing permit became effective on December 1, 2011 and expires on November 30, 2016. The State of Arkansas has been authorized by the U. S. Environmental Protection Agency to administer the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Program in Arkansas, including the issuance of general permits to categories of dischargers under the provisions of 40 CFR 122.28, as adopted by reference in Arkansas Pollution Control and Ecology Commission Regulation (Reg.) 6.104. Under this authority, ADEQ may issue a single general permit to a category of point sources located within the same geographic area whose discharges warrant similar pollution control measures. Specifically, in accordance with 40 CFR 122.28, the ADEQ is authorized to issue a general NPDES permit if there are a number of point sources operating in a geographic area that: 1.1. involve the same or substantially similar types of operations; 1.2. discharge the same types of wastes; 1.3. require the same effluent limitations or operating conditions; 1.4. require the same or similar monitoring requirements; and 1.5. in the opinion of the Director, are more appropriately controlled under a general permit than under individual permits. The violation of any condition of a general permit constitutes a violation of the Arkansas Water and Air Pollution Control Act (Ark. Code Ann. § 8-4-101 et seq.) and may subject the discharger to the penalties and revocation of coverage under the general permit.
    [Show full text]
  • EPA's Local Limits Development Guidance
    This page intentionally left blank. Backgr The Office of Wastewater Management of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s (EPA’s) Office of Water prepared this guidance document to assist municipalities that own or operate publicly owned treatment works (POTWs) in developing and implementing local pretreatment programs. Section 402(b) of the Clean Water Act (CWA) provides for EPA to authorize a State to administer its own National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit program. In order to be authorized, a State program must include adequate authority to issue permits that ensure compliance with the CWA including section 307(b) pretreatment standards. The program must ensure that permits issued to POTWs include a program to assure compliance with pretreatment standards by significant sources introducing pollutants subject to such standards to the POTW. [Section 402(b)(8), 33 U.S.C. 1342(b)(8)]. This guidance will assist POTWs in their efforts to meet their requirement to develop pretreatment programs. Di T scussi n his ent s nte . T re o equire CWA EPA egulations. Thus, it does not impose legally binding requirements on EPA, States, municipalities or the regulated community. The general descriptions provided in this document may not apply to a particular situation based upon the circumstances. This guidance does not confer legal rights or impose legal obligations upon any member of the public. Among other things, the document describes existing requirements with respect to industrial dischargers and POTWs under the CWA and its implementing regulations at 40 CFR 122, 123, 124, and 403 and chapter I, subchapter N.
    [Show full text]
  • Article 1 - General Provisions 1 .1 Provisions Not Affected by Headings
    Meeting Date: 03/16/16 (SA2) ORDINANCE NO.: 10423 (N.S.) SAN DIEGO COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT ESTABLISHING PROVISIONS FOR THE USE OF DISTRICT SEWERAGE FACILITIES The Board of Directors of the San Diego County Sanitation District {District) ordains as follows: Section I. The Board of Directors finds and determines that it is necessary to establish provisions for the use of District sewerage facilities. Section II. Adopt this Ordinance establishing the above stated provisions. Section Ill. Purpose and Policy The purpose of this ordinance is to provide for the maximum public benefit from the use of sewerage facilities of the San Diego County Sanitation District, hereafter referred to as "District". This shall be accomplished by regulating sewer use and wastewater discharges, by providing equitable distribution of District's costs and by providing procedures that will allow the District to comply with the requirements placed upon the District by other regulatory agencies. The revenues to be derived from the application of this Ordinance shall be used to defray all costs of providing sewage service by the District, including, but not limited to, administration, operation, monitoring, maintenance, financing, capital construction, replacement and recovery, and provisions for necessary reserves. This Ordinance shall be interpreted in accordance with the definitions set forth in Article II. The provisions of the Ordinance shall apply to the direct or indirect discharge of all wastewater carried by, and to, facilities of the District. To comply with Federal and State of California policies to permit the District to meet applicable standards of treatment plant effluent quality, provisions are made in this Ordinance for the regulation of wastewater discharges.
    [Show full text]
  • The Clean Water Act a Blueprint for Reform
    The Clean Water Act A Blueprint For Reform By William L. Andreen and Shana Campbell Jones uuuu CPRCENTER FOR PROGRESSIVE REFORM Center for Progressive Reform CENTER FOR PROGRESSIVE REFORM WHITE PAPER #802 July 2008 About the Authors William Andreen is the Edgar L. Clarkson Professor of Law at the University of Alabama School of Law and a Member Scholar of the Center for Progressive Reform. During the Spring of 1991, he served as a Visiting Fellow in the Law Faculty at the Australian National University. In 2005, he served as a Visiting Professor at Washington and Lee University School of Law (spring), and as a Fulbright Senior Scholar in Law at the Australian National University (fall). He also has an appointment as an Adjunct Professor of Law at the Australian National University (2006- 2009). Shana Campbell Jones, J.D., is a Policy Analyst at the Center for Progressive Reform, providing research, drafting, and coordination to CPR’s “Achieving the New Progressive Agenda” and “Government Accountability” issue groups. Prior to joining CPR, Ms. Jones worked as an associate attorney in the Norfolk office of McGuire Woods, LLP, previously clerking for the U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Virginia and the Maryland Court of Appeals. Ms. Jones also has experience as a telecommunications consultant and in nonprofit administration. Special Thanks A number of other CPR scholars made significant contributions to this publication, providing essential analysis and the ideas expressed in this white paper. Authors and contributors included Robert Adler, William Buzbee, Holly Doremus, Joseph Feller, Victor Flatt, Alyson Flournoy, Donald Hornstein, Christine Klein, Joel Mintz, Clifford Rechtschaffen, Rena Steinzor, Wendy Wagner, and Sandra Zellmer.
    [Show full text]
  • Environmental Protection Agency
    Monday, August 14, 2000 Part III Environmental Protection Agency 40 CFR Part 442 Effluent Limitations Guidelines, Pretreatment Standards, and New Source Performance Standards for the Transportation Equipment Cleaning Point Source Category; Final Rule VerDate 11<MAY>2000 15:53 Aug 11, 2000 Jkt 190000 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 4717 Sfmt 4717 E:\FR\FM\14AUR3.SGM pfrm11 PsN: 14AUR3 49666 Federal Register / Vol. 65, No. 157 / Monday, August 14, 2000 / Rules and Regulations ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION carried and transportation mode: exteriors, equipment and floor AGENCY Subpart AÐTank Trucks and washings, and TEC contaminated Intermodal Tank Containers stormwater at those facilities subject to 40 CFR Part 442 Transporting Chemical & Petroleum the TEC effluent limitations guidelines [FRLÐ6720±6] Cargos; Subpart BÐRail Tank Cars and standards. Compliance with this Transporting Chemical & Petroleum rule is estimated to reduce the annual RIN 2040±AB98 Cargos; Subpart CÐTank Barges and discharge of priority pollutants by at Ocean/Sea Tankers Transporting least 60,000 pounds per year and result Effluent Limitations Guidelines, Chemical & Petroleum Cargos; Subpart in annual benefits ranging from $1.5 Pretreatment Standards, and New DÐTanks Transporting Food Grade million to $5.5 million. The total Source Performance Standards for the Cargos. annualized compliance cost of the rule Transportation Equipment Cleaning For all four subparts, EPA is is projected to be $16.1 million (pre- Point Source Category establishing effluent limitations tax). AGENCY: guidelines for existing facilities and new Environmental Protection DATES: This regulation shall become sources discharging wastewater directly Agency (EPA). effective September 13, 2000. ACTION: Final rule. to surface waters. EPA is establishing pretreatment standards for existing ADDRESSES: The public record is SUMMARY: This regulation establishes facilities and new sources discharging available for review in the EPA Water technology-based effluent limitations wastewater to POTWs in all subparts Docket, 401 M St.
    [Show full text]
  • General Procedures for Limitations Development
    General Procedures for Limitations Development By Department for Environmental Protection Division of Water Surface Water Permits Branch Revised August 24, 2016 Table of Contents 1. TECHNOLOGY-BASED EFFLUENT LIMITATIONS .................................................................. 4 1.1. Industrial Dischargers ................................................................................................................................ 4 1.2. Methods of Imposing ................................................................................................................................. 5 1.2.1. Effluent Limitation Guidelines .......................................................................................................... 6 1.2.2. Best Professional Judgment ............................................................................................................... 6 1.2.3. Combination of ELGs and BPJ Determinations ................................................................................ 7 1.2.4. Combined Wastestreams .................................................................................................................... 7 1.3. Publicly Owned Treatment Works (POTWs) ............................................................................................ 8 1.3.1. Secondary Treatment Standards ......................................................................................................... 8 1.3.2. Special Considerations ......................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Npdes Permit No. Nm0022250 Fact Sheet
    NPDES PERMIT NO. NM0022250 FACT SHEET FOR THE DRAFT NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM (NPDES) PERMIT TO DISCHARGE TO WATERS OF THE UNITED STATES APPLICANT Albuquerque Bernalillo County Water Utility Authority (ABCWUA) PO Box 568 Albuquerque, NM 87103 ISSUING OFFICE U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Region 6 1445 Ross Avenue Dallas, Texas 75202-2733 PREPARED BY Tung Nguyen Environmental Engineer NPDES Permits & Technical Branch (6WQ-PP) Water Quality Protection Division VOICE: 214-665-7153 FAX: 214-665-2191 EMAIL: [email protected] DATE PREPARED January 1, 2018 PERMIT ACTION Renewal of a permit previously issued on September 24, 2010, with an effective date of October 1, 2012, and an expiration date of September 30, 2017. RECEIVING WATER – BASIN Rio Grande River – Middle Rio Grande Basin (Segment 20.6.4.105) PERMIT NO. NM0022250 FACT SHEET Page 2 of 16 DOCUMENT ABBREVIATIONS In the document that follows, various abbreviations are used. They are as follows: 4Q3 Lowest four-day average flow rate expected to occur once every three-years BAT Best available technology economically achievable BCT Best conventional pollutant control technology BPT Best practicable control technology currently available BMP Best management plan BOD Biochemical oxygen demand (five-day unless noted otherwise) BPJ Best professional judgment CBOD Carbonaceous biochemical oxygen demand (five-day unless noted otherwise) CD Critical dilution CFR Code of Federal Regulations cfs Cubic feet per second COD Chemical oxygen demand COE United States Corp
    [Show full text]
  • 401 Energy and Environment Cabinet
    401 KAR 5:002. Definitions for 401 KAR Chapter 5. RELATES TO: KRS 224.1-010, 224.1-070, 224.1-400, 224.70-100, 224.70-120, 224.99- 010, 40 C.F.R. 35, 116, 122, 130, 131, 133, 136, 141, 401-471, 15 U.S.C. 2601 - 2629, 33 U.S.C. 1251 - 1387, 42 U.S.C. 6901-6992k, 7401 - 7671q, 9601, 11023 STATUTORY AUTHORITY: KRS 224.10-100(5), 224.10-110, 224.16-050, 224.16-060, 224.70-110, 40 C.F.R. 116, 122, 130, 131, 136, 401-471, 15 U.S.C. 2601 - 2629, 33 U.S.C. 1251 – 1387 NECESSITY, FUNCTION, AND CONFORMITY: KRS 224.10-100(5) authorizes the cabinet to promulgate administrative regulations for the prevention, abatement, and control of all water pollution. This administrative regulation establishes definitions for terms used in 401 KAR Chapter 5. These definitions are not more stringent than the federal counterparts. Section 1. Definitions. (1) "Abandoned well" means a well not currently in use and not in- tended for future use. (2) "Activity" means, in 401 KAR 5:050 through 401 KAR 5:080 and if used in conjunction with "facility", a KPDES point source, or other activity, including land or related appurtenances, that is subject to regulation under the KPDES program. (3) "Administrator" is defined by 40 C.F.R. 122.2. (4) "Agriculture operation" is defined by KRS 224.71-100. (5) "Agricultural wastes handling system" means a structure or equipment that conveys, stores, or treats manure from an animal feeding operation prior to land application.
    [Show full text]
  • GAO-12-845, Water Pollution: EPA Has Improved Its Review of Effluent
    United States Government Accountability Office Report to the Ranking Member, GAO Subcommittee on Water Resources and Environment, Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure, House of Representatives September 2012 WATER POLLUTION EPA Has Improved Its Review of Effluent Guidelines but Could Benefit from More Information on Treatment Technologies GAO-12-845 September 2012 WATER POLLUTION EPA Has Improved Its Review of Effluent Guidelines but Could Benefit from More Information on Treatment Technologies Highlights of GAO-12-845, a report to the Ranking Member, Subcommittee on Water Resources and Environment, Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure, House of Representatives Why GAO Did This Study What GAO Found Under the Clean Water Act, EPA has The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) uses a two-phase process to made significant progress in reducing identify industrial categories potentially needing new or revised effluent wastewater pollution from industrial guidelines to help reduce their pollutant discharges. EPA’s 2002 draft Strategy facilities. EPA currently regulates for National Clean Water Industrial Regulations was the foundation for EPA’s 58 industrial categories, such as process. In the first, or “screening,” phase, EPA uses data from two EPA petroleum refining, fertilizer databases to rank industrial categories according to the total toxicity of their manufacturing, and coal mining, with wastewater. Using this ranking, public comments, and other considerations, EPA technology-based regulations called has identified relatively few industrial categories posing the highest hazard for the effluent guidelines. Such guidelines are next, or “further review,” phase. In this further review phase, EPA evaluates the applied in permits to limit the pollutants categories to identify those that are appropriate for new or revised guidelines that facilities may discharge.
    [Show full text]