53. Hobart City Council

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

53. Hobart City Council HEALTHY TASMANIA FIVE YEAR STRATEGIC PLAN – COMMUNITY CONSULTATION DRAFT CITY OF HOBART FEEDBACK DOCUMENT Contents Recommended New Actions to be considered as part of the Healthy Tasmania Five Year Strategic Plan: ............................................................... 3 Response to Questions: ................................................ 6 The City of Hobart Strategic Framework ..................... 11 Recommended New Actions to be considered as part of the Healthy Tasmania Five Year Strategic Plan: General Comment The Healthy Tasmania Five Year Strategic Plan would benefit from co-investment with local governments including developing partnership opportunities to provide infrastructure, parks, playgrounds and resources that support healthy activity. Local government is positioned well to be involved in health and well being as it is the tier of government that has strong existing relationships with communities. This strategy would benefit from closer partnerships, and resourcing and funding to increase the provision of health services on the ground. New Actions As defined by the World Health Organisation, a ‘Healthy City’ is one that is continually creating and improving those physical and social environments and expanding those community resources which enable people to mutually support each other in performing all the functions of life and developing to their maximum potential. Healthy Cities are arguably the best-known and largest of the settings approaches. The programme is a long-term international development initiative that aims to place health high on the agendas of decision makers and to promote comprehensive local strategies for health protection and sustainable development. Basic features include community participation and empowerment, intersectoral partnerships, and participant equity. A Healthy City aims to: • Create a health-supportive environment; • Achieve a good quality of life; • Provide basic sanitation and hygiene needs; and • Supply access to health care. Page 3 Evaluations of Healthy Cities programmes have proven them successful in increasing understanding of health and environment linkages and in the creation of intersectoral partnerships to ensure a sustainable, widespread programme. The most successful Healthy Cities programmes maintain momentum from: • The commitment of local community members; • A clear vision; • The ownership of policies; • A wide array of stakeholders; and • A process for institutionalising the programme. The Heart Foundation Healthy by Design Paper, Tasmania, has excellent ideas and ways to ensure that the built environment is increasing community health and wellbeing. These guidelines provide design considerations for walking and cycling routes, streets, local destinations, open spaces, public transport and strategies for fostering community spirit. Healthy by Design website and Join the dots campaigns include information about hydration, energy and injury prevention; breakfast and mental health; stretching and injury prevention, provide interesting and fun ways to share information and educate. In line with these internationally successful models, it is recommended that the Tasmanian Government consider the following actions: • Increase health promotion and preventative health programs; • Include Social Determinant of Health to improve healthy outcomes; • Increase access to information and choices to move, including access to footpaths, playgrounds and cycle ways; • Commit to support local government in developing infrastructure to encourage people to be active as part of commuting to work or study by providing end of trip facilities such as secure parking, lockers and showers; • Allocate ongoing funding for the successful Ride2School program, expand and support the walking school bus program and implement other programs that discourage parents from driving their children to school; • Establish a funding stream for health initiatives to support communities to take the lead on place-based, context-appropriate solutions. • Address intergenerational cultural choices around movement and food choices; Page 4 • Allocate a percentage of the roads budget to Local Government to build separated cycle-ways and improve pedestrian amenity; • Planning scheme changes be based on best practice urban design principles encouraging non vehicular access and movement and green recreational spaces; • Students be discouraged from vehicular use to access educational facilities and be supported to use public transport and self transport with better facilities; and • Increase information on food packaging, and increased education about nutritional value of the food product, and potential outcome of over use. Any program or initiatives within the Healthy Tasmania Five Year Strategic Plan would need to be resourced to achieve the best outcomes. Partnership opportunities with existing services, for delivery of activities in local communities, would be important. Potential activities include: • Walk and ride to school / work programs; • Supported peer programs in schools - for children and families; • Nutrition awareness programs; • Healthy shopping programs; • Farm gate to plate - meet the producers programs; • Farm gate to plate - learn to use fresh local produce programs; • Community celebrations with healthy food options; • Access to information across services - including educational services, community hub; • Health promotion and civic activation for health promotion activities; • Supporting local community, sporting and active groups to showcase their activities and grow their membership; • Support local community connections • Change the way information is shared about chronic disease, hereditary disease and lifestyle conditions; • Increased infrastructure for parks and playgrounds; and • Increase option to chose to walk, ride, play. Page 5 Response to Questions: 1. Where do you think the current actions we are taking on prevention and promotion have proven effective in improving the health of Tasmanians? Work undertaken in small communities engaging with non-government agencies and community groups to share information on preventative health and health promotion are addressing many important elements of Quality of Life / Health / Happiness which are consistent with the “Wellness approach to service delivery” that is driving aged care reforms in Australia. The extension material and service information distributed by DHHS Public Health Services / Population Health have been a very useful resource. This has included: (i) Face-to-face support to service providers through the Community Nutrition Unit; (ii) Support to use the Appetite for life manual; (iii) Training and support to use the malnutrition Screening Tool with clients; (iv) Support from around Physical Activity; and (v) The Find Thirty extension material. Support and training from Health Promotion South around health literacy / writing easier-to-read material has been excellent. They have provided resources relating to writing easier-to-read material, which has changed the way programs engage with clients / customers across the organisation. 2. Where do you see that the most effective changes could be made in terms of overall population health benefit? Addressing the health benefits in all policies and focusing on health promotion and information sharing. Health prevention targeting young families with information and resources to ensure generational changes to health and an intergenerational health shift. Working with established networks, including local governments, rather than recreating a new system, to partner and work on the ground with existing community relationships, and building on these. By increasing access to public play space, and ensuring choices around walking, riding or driving, this would improve physical activity. Page 6 3. Are there any alternative governance principles, strategies or enablers that would better support the shift to a more cost-effective model for preventative health in Tasmania? The Healthy Tasmania Committee (HTC) framework and principles identify key areas of focus, and priority areas to focus on. These would be supported by the City of Hobart. (i) Concentrate on the early years; (ii) Create health where people live, learn, work and play; (iii) Target health risk factors; and (iv) Focus on the health of vulnerable groups. Maintaining supports and access in local areas, with State-wide leadership and public access to information and working in health promoting ways are all fundamental to the success in changing the state health picture. 4. What evidence supports these alternatives as helping us achieve better health outcomes? Issues that need to be considered in this area include the cost of living, food security, and access to healthy choices. 5. Do you think the targets will be effective in driving the change Tasmania needs to see in health outcomes? These targets need to be delivered over a generation or two, in partnership with local governments and local communities. 6. What targets would you like to see the Government adopt to reduce health inequities in the target areas outlined above? The City of Hobart is not in a position to comment on targets. 7. What indicators of health status provide the best picture of whether progress is being achieved and could be monitored on HealthStats? The City of Hobart is not in a position to comment on HealthStats. 8. Are there ways we can better integrate the data on HealthStats into our work and use it to support the achievements of improved
Recommended publications
  • Minutes Need to Be Changed at All)
    (v.1 Please let me know if the minutes need to be changed at all) Kevin Turner RDA Tasmania Mobile: 0419395178 Email: [email protected] MINUTES Local Government Economic Development Network Thursday 28th August 2020 Online via Zoom 2pm to 4pm Attendees Thanks to the 28 who attended and welcome to those joined for the first time: Adriaan Stander (Kingborough Council: Strategic Planner), Bill Duhig (Skills Tasmania: Project Manager), Bruce Williams (City of Launceston: Economic Development Officer), Carol Bracken (Cradle Coast Authority: Program Manager - Regional Futures Plan), Carolyn Coates (Hobart City Council: International Relations | Economic Development, Engagement and Strategy | Community Life), Craig Perkins (RDA Tasmania: Chief Executive Officer & Director Regional Development), Erin McGoldrick (Glenorchy City Council: Manager City Strategy and Economic Development), Fiona Ranson (City of Launceston: Urban Design & Heritage Planner), Jackie Harvey (State Growth: Project Manager), Jaime Parsons (City of Launceston: Team Leader Place Making, Liveable Communities), Jane Eldershaw (State Growth: Project Manager Antarctic Tasmania and Regional Coordination), Jen Newman (RDA Tasmania: Regional Development Coordinator), Kevin Turner (RDA Tasmania: Regional Development Coordinator), Linda Seeborn (Skills Tasmania: Manager, Workforce Policy and Programs), Lucy Knot (Hobart City Council: Economic Development Project Officer), Luke Doyle (Hobart City Council: Manager Economic Development, Engagement and Strategy), Marilyn
    [Show full text]
  • St Johns Burial Ground New Town, Hobart Tasmania, Rosemary Davidson
    TASMANIAN FAMILY HISTORY SOCIETY INC. PO Box 191 Launceston Tasmania 7250 State Secretary: [email protected] Journal Editor: [email protected] Home Page: http://www.tasfhs.org Patron: Dr Alison Alexander Fellows: Dr Neil Chick and Mr David Harris Executive: President Anita Swan (03) 6326 5778 Vice President Maurice Appleyard (03) 6248 4229 Vice President Peter Cocker (03) 6435 4103 State Secretary Muriel Bissett (03) 6344 4034 State Treasurer Betty Bissett (03) 6344 4034 Committee: Kerrie Blyth John Gillham Jim Rouse Judy Cocker Libby Gillham Margaret Strempel Sandra Duck Leo Prior Robert Tanner By-laws Officer (vacant) Assistant By-laws Officer Maurice Appleyard (03) 6248 4229 Webmaster Robert Tanner (03) 6231 0794 Journal Editors Anita Swan (03) 6326 5778 Betty Bissett (03) 6344 4034 LWFHA Coordinator Anita Swan (03) 6394 8456 Members’ Interests Compiler Jim Rouse (03) 6239 6529 Membership Registrar Muriel Bissett (03) 6344 4034 Publications Convenor Bev Richardson (03) 6225 3292 Public Officer Colleen Read (03) 6244 4527 State Sales Officer Betty Bissett (03) 6344 4034 Branches of the Society Burnie: PO Box 748 Burnie Tasmania 7320 [email protected] Devonport: PO Box 267 Latrobe Tasmania 7307 [email protected] Hobart: PO Box 326 Rosny Park Tasmania 7018 [email protected] Huon: PO Box 117 Huonville Tasmania 7109 [email protected] Launceston: PO Box 1290 Launceston Tasmania 7250 [email protected] Volume 30 Number 1 June 2009 ISSN 0159 0677 Contents From the editor ............................................................................................................... 2 President’s Message ....................................................................................................... 3 Branch Reports .............................................................................................................. 4 13th AFFHO Congress Auckland January 2009, Dianne Snowden ............................... 7 The Road to Sandy Bay Leads to Hell on Sundays, Sally Rackham ...........................
    [Show full text]
  • The SGS Greater Hobart: Local Government Reform Final
    Greater Hobart: Local Government Reform Final Feasibility Report Clarence City, Glenorchy City, Hobart City & Kingborough Councils January 2017 SGS Final Report_Feasibility Study Greater Hobart 300117 This report has been prepared for Clarence City, Glenorchy City, Hobart City & Kingborough Councils. SGS Economics and Planning has taken all due care in the preparation of this report. However, SGS and its associated consultants are not liable to any person or entity for any damage or loss that has occurred, or may occur, in relation to that person or entity taking or not taking action in respect of any representation, statement, opinion or advice referred to herein. SGS Economics and Planning Pty Ltd ACN 007 437 729 www.sgsep.com.au Offices in Canberra, Hobart, Melbourne and Sydney SGS Final Report_Feasibility Study Greater Hobart 300117 TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY I 1 INTRODUCTION I 2 THE CASE FOR CHANGE 1 2.1 Why reform and how? 1 Objectives of local government reform 1 Greater Hobart as a City Region 1 2.2 Serving communities of interest 5 Communities of interest 5 Common priorities & Council services 8 2.3 The reform options 9 Option 1. Business as Usual – stand-alone councils 10 Option 2. Amalgamation of Clarence, Glenorchy, Hobart and Kingborough 10 Option 3. Strategic Alliance between Clarence, Glenorchy, Hobart and Kingborough 11 Option 4. Amalgamation of Clarence, Glenorchy and Hobart 12 Option 5. Amalgamation of Glenorchy and Hobart 13 3 OPTIONS EVALUATION 15 3.1 Financial feasibility analysis 15 Financial costs and savings of the merger options 15 Financial costs Option 3 – Strategic Alliance.
    [Show full text]
  • Agenda of Council Meeting
    COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA MONDAY, 21 DECEMBER 2020 GLENORCHY CITY COUNCIL QUALIFIED PERSON CERTIFICATION The General Manager certifies that, in accordance with section 65 of the Local Government Act 1993, any advice, information and recommendations contained in the reports related to this agenda have been prepared by persons who have the qualifications or experience necessary to give such advice, information and recommendations. ______________________ Tony McMullen General Manager 16 December 2020 Hour: 6.00 p.m. Present (in Chambers): Present (by video link): In attendance (in Chambers): In attendance (by video link): Leave of Absence: Workshops held since Date: Monday, 7 December 2020 last Council Meeting Purpose: To discuss: • Glenorchy District Football Club – Lease negotiations Date: Monday, 14 December 2020 Purpose: To discuss: • Playspace Strategy objectives • Aldermen Q&A session II TABLE OF CONTENTS: 1. APOLOGIES ................................................................................................ 5 2. CONFIRMATION OF MINUTES (OPEN MEETING) ......................................... 5 3. ANNOUNCEMENTS BY THE CHAIR .............................................................. 5 4. PECUNIARY INTEREST NOTIFICATION ......................................................... 5 5. RESPONSE TO PREVIOUS PUBLIC QUESTIONS TAKEN ON NOTICE ................ 5 6. PUBLIC QUESTION TIME (15 MINUTES) ....................................................... 7 7. PETITIONS/DEPUTATIONS .........................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 2016/2017 Annual Report Welcome
    2016/2017 Annual Report welcome The 2016/2017 financial year saw Destination Southern Tasmania (DST) celebrate its fifth year of operation as southern Tasmania’s Regional Tourism Organisation (RTO). Covering a large region, incorporating 11 of Tasmania’s 29 local government areas, DST has worked hard to facilitate industry development activities in the southern region. Establishing key linkages and bringing industry together to build capacity has informed sustainable outcomes, enhancing the state’s visitor economy. This year we have seen record visitation to southern Tasmania, with over one million interstate and overseas visitors. DST has received continued growth in membership and has achieved high levels of industry engagement evidenced by over 850 attendees at DST industry events throughout the year. It is with much pleasure that DST presents its 2017 Annual Report. We trust that it will communicate the passion and energy that our organisation brings to the tourism community in Southern Tasmania. ⊲ Huon Valley Mid- Winter Fest Photography Natalie Mendham Photography Cover ⊲ Top left Cascade Brewery Photography Flow Mountain Bike Woobly Boot Vineyard Photography Samuel Shelley Huon Valley Mid-Winter Fest Photography Natalie Mendham Photography ⊲ Middle left Dark Mofo: Dark Park Photography Adam Gibson Sailing on the River Derwent Photography Samuel Shelley Australian Wooden Boat Festival Photography Samuel Shelley ⊲ Bottom left MACq01 Photography Adam Gibson Shene Estate & Distillery Photography Rob Burnett Mountain biking, Mt Wellington
    [Show full text]
  • Explore It Love It Experience It Achieve It
    STUDY IN AN EXHILARATING AND SUPPORTIVE ACADEMIC, CULTURAL AND SOCIAL ENVIRONMENT Welcome Love it Experience it Achieve it The University of Tasmania welcomes students from Living on-campus in University accommodation provides you Living in University accommodation is more than just a roof Regardless of the type of University accommodation around the world to live and study in an exhilarating and with easy access to many additional facilities and services, at over your head. You will be part of a safe, healthy, supportive you choose, all on-campus options provide a safe and supportive academic, cultural and social environment. no additional cost, including: and resilient residential academic community. You will supportive living environment with diverse residential Gaining knowledge and setting the foundation for an exciting s 0RIVATE FURNISHED BEDROOM COMPLETE WITH have endless opportunities to share, learn and experience support programs to encourage personal, social and career is part of a wider university experience. It is a unique ‘internet ready’ study area different values, cultures and customs. cultural development. experience that includes making lifelong friendships, enjoying s 3ECURE SWIPE CARD ACCESS THROUGHOUT BUILDINGS /NE OF THE MOST MEMORABLE PARTS OF LIVING ON CAMPUS IS There are also countless opportunities to actively the magnificent beauty and the recreational activities that and to all bedrooms meeting students from all over Australia and from many participate in a wide variety of programs that promote Tasmania offers while living in quality accommodation with s 2ECREATIONAL AREAS WITH WIRELESS INTERNET parts of the world, living and studying together and forming and foster leadership skills, independence, community all the facilities you need to study and relax.
    [Show full text]
  • Regional Context 8 Regional Context
    7 REGIONAL CONTEXT 8 REGIONAL CONTEXT To understand the function of the Huon Valley municipal area at a regional level, it is important to understand the evolution of land use, particularly in an urban sense. Since European settlement, cities in proximity to the coast have dominated the settlement patterns across Australia. As Australia was colonised post industrial-revolution, rural development spread out from the cities as support for the urban population. As Australian cities have grown, agriculture has been pushed outwards, with increasing suburban areas surrounding urban centres utilising rural land in order to meet the housing needs of the population. This pattern of urbanisation is evident with the evolution of Hobart and surrounding districts. As the fi rst European township within Tasmania, Hobart developed as the major urban centre of Tasmania and later Southern Tasmania. With population growth over the past 100 years and associated development many surrounding rural areas have been urbanised, with the rural resources required to fuel this growth being sourced from more remote localities.It is in this context that the Huon Valley played an important role in supplying timber and agricultural produce to the growing population of Hobart. Today, the State of Tasmania can be divided into three distinct regions: Southern, Northern & North-Western. Each of these regions has their urban centre, although given the size of Tasmanian there is inter-reliance between these regions. Huon Valley & the Southern Tasmanian Region The Huon Valley municipal area along with the Kingborough municipal area wholly comprises the southern region of the Greater Hobart area. The municipal area of Hobart forms not only the geographical but economic centre for Greater Hobart.
    [Show full text]
  • Greater Hobart Strategic Partnership – Submission to Premier’S Economic and Social Recovery Advisory Council (PESRAC) June 2020 Executive Summary
    Greater Hobart Strategic Partnership – Submission to Premier’s Economic and Social Recovery Advisory Council (PESRAC) June 2020 Executive Summary The Greater Hobart Strategic Partnership welcomes the opportunity to submit this proposal to be a key partner in the COVID-19 recovery process. With an established metro scale governance framework established through the Greater Hobart Act 2019, we have a well-coordinated partnership and governance model and implementation plan ready to pivot our partnership to work in collaboration with PESRAC. As the layer of government closest to community, we have implemented local level actions to address the impacts of COVID-19 in the immediate crisis phase. These actions have been consistent with the legislated Emergency Management and Recovery frameworks already in place; and are ongoing. As we look forward, the Greater Hobart Strategic Partnership is the ideal partner to kick-start local economies, create grass roots jobs, and deliver worthwhile stimulus projects in the Greater Hobart region. We can test and deliver pilot projects quickly on the ground, serving as an active agent in stimulating the local economy. The Greater Hobart Councils also have the ability to be an effective agent in social recovery, including access to communities that are currently isolated and disengaged e.g. elderly people, emerging communities and multicultural communities. Each of our councils has, or is in the process of, finalising social and economic recovery plans for our communities. These local level recovery plans will place people, and the social, creative and cultural activities which enhance the social fabric of communities, at the heart of recovery planning.
    [Show full text]
  • CITY of HOBART TRANSPORT STRATEGY DRAFT VISION STATEMENT Hobart Breathes
    CITY OF HOBART TRANSPORT STRATEGY DRAFT VISION STATEMENT Hobart breathes. Connections between nature, history, culture, businesses and each other are the heart of our city. We are brave and caring. We resist mediocrity and sameness. As we grow, we remember what makes this place special. We walk in the fresh air between all the best things in life. ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF COUNTRY The City of Hobart acknowledges the palawa people as the traditional and ongoing Custodians of lutruwita (Tasmania). The City of Hobart pays its respects to the Elders past, present and future, as we work towards the community’s vision for future Hobart. 2 City of Hobart Transport Strategy 2018–30 DRAFT City of Hobart Transport Strategy 2018–30 DRAFT 3 INTRODUCTION FROM THE LORD MAYOR facilities have begun. Indeed, cornerstones Through community engagement with the from that strategy have now been adopted Hobart Vision process, we have a clearer by Infrastructure Tasmania in its 2018 Hobart understanding of what people want, and Transport Vision. what can be done but this will require change and investment to create the city There is much more to do. We are all aware that that is connected into the future. We need greater Hobart is at a turning point. In the past to complete and extend a network of bicycle decade Australia and the rest of the world have facilities, we need to make the city even more discovered our liveable, cultured city situated walkable, and we need real improvements in in a relatively unspoilt natural environment. bus service reach and frequency. We need Visitor numbers are increasing, our population is to develop River Derwent ferry services, growing, and construction projects both in the passenger transport services and housing on city and in neighbouring council areas are at a the existing rail corridor.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report 2015
    annual report 2015 a YNOT annual report report annual YNOT 2015 the peak body for the youth sector in Tasmania vision A Tasmania where young people are actively engaged in community life and have contents access to the resources needed to develop their potential. Chair’s report 2 Board members 5 Sponsors and supporters 6 mission YNOT members 7 To work with young people, CEO report 8 the Tasmanian youth sector, Volunteers 9 the community and all levels of government to increase the Statewide Youth Collaborative (SYC) Group 10 participation and contribution Youth Action Priorities (YAP) 11 of young people in the state. Northern Youth Coordinating Committee (NYCC) 12 North West Action for Youth (NWAY) 13 1 Collaborations: policy, advocacy and communications 14 report annual YNOT YNOT 21st AGM and Sector Forum 17 Youth Ethics Framework for Tasmania 18 TYF Policy and Project Officer report 19 All about TYF 20 TYF Members and Volunteers 21 2015 National Youth Week 22 Youth Homelessness Matters Day 23 TYF Employment Forum 24 TYF Mental Health Matters Forum 25 Other Opportunities with TYF 26 Tasmanian Youth Conference (TYC) overview 27 TYC young person report 29 TYC working group 32 chair’s report I first became involved with YNOT through the Youth Ethics Framework for Tasmania working group and I’m pleased to say that the work that began four years ago is still going strong. It’s rare to see an initiative like this Tasmanian Youth stay alive and active, and even rarer Conference to see its results flourish and grow. Ideas come and go and it may What strikes me most about this seem that our efforts are nothing unique event is the seamless more than just activity for the mixing of young people and sector sake of being busy.
    [Show full text]
  • Meeting Notes Huonville, Thursday 22 Nd April 2021, 1Pm to 4Pm
    Meeting Notes Huonville, Thursday 22 nd April 2021, 1pm to 4pm Attendees Adriaan Stander [email protected] Belinda Loxley [email protected] Ben Marquis [email protected] Bruce Williams [email protected] Erin McGoldrick [email protected] Helen Thomas [email protected] Ingrid Andersen [email protected] Jen Newman [email protected] Karly Herighty [email protected] Kevin Turner [email protected] Lucy Knott [email protected] Meagan Bennett [email protected] Michelle Gledhill [email protected] Michelle Allen [email protected] Paul Hanlon [email protected] Robert Hall [email protected] Sheena Hannan [email protected] Tanya Doubleday [email protected] Tim Hankey [email protected] Trina Mangels [email protected] Apologies Carl Gallagher [email protected] Damien Blackwell [email protected] Ian Hart [email protected] Jaime Parsons [email protected] Luke Doyle [email protected] Marissa McArthur [email protected] Mike Brindley [email protected] 1. Michelle Gledhill, Manager Economic Development, Huon Valley Council Summary: Michelle’s presentation worked through the different activities that the team of 3 undertake that give them the knowledge, relationships, and influence to make strength-based decisions to support economic development. They have created opportunities for investment attraction, population growth and industry development that all fit with the communities’ vision for the Huon Valley.
    [Show full text]
  • Council Meeting Agenda Monday, 25 November 2019
    COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA MONDAY, 25 NOVEMBER 2019 GLENORCHY CITY COUNCIL Hour: 6.00 p.m. Present: In attendance: Leave of Absence: Date: Monday, 4 November 2019 Workshops held since last Council Meeting Purpose: To discuss: • Investigation into Land Sales • Leases and Licencing Policy Date: Monday, 11 November 2019 Purpose: To discuss: • Community Yarns Debrief • Cyber Security Date: Monday, 18 November 2019 Purpose: To discuss: • Safer Footpath Program • Budget Process Update TABLE OF CONTENTS: 1. APOLOGIES ................................................................................................ 4 2. CONFIRMATION OF MINUTES (OPEN MEETING) ......................................... 4 3. ANNOUNCEMENTS BY THE CHAIR .............................................................. 4 4. PECUNIARY INTEREST NOTIFICATION ......................................................... 4 5. RESPONSE TO PREVIOUS PUBLIC QUESTIONS TAKEN ON NOTICE ................ 4 6. PUBLIC QUESTION TIME (15 MINUTES) ...................................................... 12 7. PETITIONS/DEPUTATIONS ......................................................................... 19 COMMUNITY ....................................................................... 20 8. ANNOUNCEMENTS BY THE MAYOR ........................................................... 21 9. APPOINTMENT OF COMMUNITY REPRESENTATIVES TO THE SAFER COMMUNITIES ADVISORY COMMITTEE .......................................... 25 ENVIRONMENT .................................................................... 28 10.
    [Show full text]